25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Fifth Freedom<br />

reconquer <strong>the</strong>ir former colony, hav<strong>in</strong>g rejected repeated overtures from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Viet M<strong>in</strong>h, <strong>the</strong> anti-French resistance whom <strong>the</strong> State Department<br />

recognized <strong>in</strong> secret to be <strong>the</strong> representatives of Vietnamese nationalism;<br />

a favorable response might have permitted <strong>the</strong> Communist-led national<br />

movement to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>dependence, thus underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> official<br />

rationale for <strong>the</strong> US-French attack. US <strong>in</strong>telligence was <strong>the</strong>n assigned<br />

<strong>the</strong> task of demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> required truth: that Vietnamese<br />

nationalists were simply agents of <strong>the</strong> “Commie-dom<strong>in</strong>ated bloc of slave<br />

states,” <strong>in</strong> Dean Acheson’s elegant phrase.<br />

Intelligence sought desperately to f<strong>in</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>ks between Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h<br />

and his masters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kreml<strong>in</strong> or “Peip<strong>in</strong>g”; ei<strong>the</strong>r would do. It failed.<br />

State Department <strong>in</strong>telligence found evidence of “Kreml<strong>in</strong>-directed<br />

conspiracy . . . <strong>in</strong> virtually all countries except Vietnam,” which<br />

appeared to be “an anomaly,” and found “surpris<strong>in</strong>gly little direct<br />

cooperation between local Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Communists and <strong>the</strong> Viet M<strong>in</strong>h.” The<br />

problem, <strong>the</strong>n, was to show how <strong>the</strong>se facts demonstrated <strong>the</strong> required<br />

conclusion: that Ho was an agent of <strong>the</strong> Commie conspiracy.<br />

The problem was readily solved. Perhaps “a special dispensation for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Vietnam government has been arranged <strong>in</strong> Moscow,” presumably<br />

because Ho was such a loyal slave of his masters that <strong>the</strong>y did not even<br />

have to provide direct guidance. Later, a National Intelligence Estimate<br />

noted that “We are unable to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r Peip<strong>in</strong>g or Moscow has<br />

ultimate responsibility for Viet M<strong>in</strong>h policy”; it is axiomatic that it must<br />

be one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. One of <strong>the</strong> most astonish<strong>in</strong>g revelations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Pentagon Papers is that <strong>in</strong> a record of over two decades, <strong>the</strong> analysts<br />

were able to discover only one staff paper “which treats communist<br />

reactions primarily <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> separate national <strong>in</strong>terests of Hanoi,<br />

Moscow, and Peip<strong>in</strong>g, ra<strong>the</strong>r than primarily <strong>in</strong> terms of an overall<br />

communist strategy for which Hanoi is act<strong>in</strong>g as an agent.” Even US<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligence, which is paid to get <strong>the</strong> facts straight, not to rave about <strong>the</strong><br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!