25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

415<br />

revolution had expressed a hope that <strong>the</strong>ir democratic revolution would<br />

extend “without frontiers.” In fact, <strong>the</strong>re is a similar phrase <strong>in</strong> a speech<br />

by Sand<strong>in</strong>ista leader Tomás Borge, who said <strong>in</strong> July 1981 that “this<br />

revolution transcends national boundaries,” mak<strong>in</strong>g it quite clear that he<br />

meant ideological transcendence. He proceeds to say: “this does not<br />

mean we export our revolution. It is enough—and we couldn’t do<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise—for us to export our example . . . we know that it is <strong>the</strong><br />

people <strong>the</strong>mselves of <strong>the</strong>se countries who must make <strong>the</strong>ir revolutions.”<br />

No one familiar with <strong>the</strong> US government dis<strong>in</strong>formation system could<br />

doubt what would follow; and sure enough, <strong>in</strong> September 1985 <strong>the</strong> State<br />

Department published a document attempt<strong>in</strong>g to prove Nicaraguan<br />

aggressiveness, entitled “Revolution beyond our Borders,” referr<strong>in</strong>g to this<br />

very speech, with a mistranslation of Borge’s statement excised from <strong>the</strong><br />

immediate context to make it appear that <strong>the</strong> Sand<strong>in</strong>istas <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

boast of <strong>the</strong>ir aggressiveness. The fraud is exposed by <strong>the</strong> Council on<br />

Hemispheric Affairs, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Report on <strong>the</strong> Hemisphere, Oct. 16,<br />

1985. The tradition of fabrication is a hoary one. See TNCW, 71, and<br />

references of note 56, below, for earlier examples.<br />

4. NYT, March 20, 1984, June 5. 1985; LAT, Nov. 14, 13, 1984.<br />

5. Langley, Banana Wars, 153f., 137, 123f.; Stuart Chreigton Miller,<br />

“Benevolent Assimilation” (Yale, 1982), 230-2.<br />

6. Ba<strong>in</strong>, Sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Darkness, 78, 66, 86f.; Miller, Benevolent Assimilation,<br />

164, 65f., 95, 116, 235, 269.<br />

7. Daniel B. Schirmer, Republic or Empire (Schenkman, 1972), 231, 236-<br />

9.<br />

8. T. D. Allman, Unmanifest Dest<strong>in</strong>y (Dial, 1984), 277, 259, 265;<br />

Scientific American quoted by Ronald Takaki, Iron Cages (Knopf,<br />

1979), 162.<br />

9. For specific references, see For Reasons of State, 114f., 127f.; TNCW,<br />

198f.<br />

10. John Goshko and Charles Babcock, WP, April 14, 1984. In apparent<br />

contradiction to Rub<strong>in</strong>’s accurate statement, Moore (“Tripp<strong>in</strong>g through<br />

Wonderland”) claims that “<strong>the</strong> U.S. has repeatedly raised <strong>the</strong> Cuban-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!