25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

413<br />

respond<strong>in</strong>g to an op-ed of Sept. 13 by Ilana DeBare; Walter Ruby,<br />

Jerusalem Post, Aug. 21, 1984, Genesis 2, Sept. 1984; Americas<br />

Watch, Human Rights <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua; Ignacio Klich, Le Monde<br />

diplomatique (Dec. 1983); Stan Ste<strong>in</strong>reich, Jewish Student Press<br />

Service, Genesis 2 (Sept./Oct. 1983). For Rabbi Rosenthal’s reiteration<br />

of <strong>the</strong> ADL charges, see Jewish Post, Sept. 5, 1984; Le Monde<br />

diplomatique, June 1984.<br />

86. Human Rights <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua.<br />

87. COHA press release, Aug. 1985; Stephen Vaughn, Hold<strong>in</strong>g Fast <strong>the</strong><br />

Inner L<strong>in</strong>es (U. of North Carol<strong>in</strong>a, 1980), 194. For discussion and <strong>the</strong><br />

broader context, see TNCW, chap. 1.<br />

88. E.g., Moore, “Tripp<strong>in</strong>g through Wonderland,” who attributes to me <strong>the</strong><br />

claim that “progressive” forces such as Cuba, Nicaragua, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Salvador guerrillas, have an “exemplary human rights record”—what I<br />

wrote is that <strong>the</strong>ir “abuses of human rights and democratic pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,<br />

often real,” are not <strong>the</strong> cause of US opposition to Cuba and Nicaragua,<br />

as is obvious from US support for far more violent regimes; <strong>the</strong> Salvador<br />

guerrillas are not mentioned; <strong>the</strong> word “progressive,” which he repeatedly<br />

gives <strong>in</strong> quotes, is his <strong>in</strong>vention. Moore also speaks of my “commitment<br />

to <strong>the</strong> radical regime,” non-existent of course, but Moore would have no<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r way of <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g heretical views with regard to <strong>the</strong> Holy State.<br />

89. Jonathan Steele, London Review of Books, April 4, 1985.<br />

90. On <strong>the</strong> technique of constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g debate with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bounds of <strong>the</strong> state<br />

propaganda system, see TNCW and earlier work cited; also, my “Notes<br />

on Orwell’s Problem” <strong>in</strong> Knowledge of Language (Praeger, 1985).<br />

91. Randolph Ryan, BG, Aug. 27, 1985.<br />

92. For much fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion, see <strong>the</strong> references of note 90.<br />

93. 1983 Report of <strong>the</strong> House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,<br />

cited by Joanne Omang and Edward Cody, WP, March 11, 1985; Wayne<br />

Smith, LAT, Aug. 25, 1985.<br />

94. Joel Br<strong>in</strong>kley, NYT, June 5, 1985.<br />

95. Connell-Smith, 23f., 343.<br />

96. LASA report, cited above; Colman McCarthy, WP (MG Weekly, March

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!