25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

409<br />

56. President Lyndon B. Johnson, speeches on Nov. 1, Nov. 2, 1966; Public<br />

Papers of <strong>the</strong> Presidents of <strong>the</strong> United States, 1966, Book II<br />

(Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, 1967), 563, 568; Congressional Record, March 15,<br />

1948, House, 2883.<br />

57. Dean Acheson, Present at <strong>the</strong> Creation (Norton, 1969), 219; see TNCW,<br />

195f., for more extensive discussion.<br />

58. Seymour Hersh, The Price of Power (Summit, 1983), 270, quot<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Roger Morris; Morton Halper<strong>in</strong> et al., The Lawless State (Pengu<strong>in</strong>,<br />

1976), 17, cit<strong>in</strong>g Hersh, NYT, Sept. 11, 1974.<br />

59. LaFeber, Inevitable Revolutions, 157.<br />

60. Walter Laqueur, WSJ, April 9, 1981; Economist, Sept. 19, 1981. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> terrorist war aga<strong>in</strong>st Cuba conducted from US bases under US<br />

government auspices, see Herman, Real Terror Network, TNCW, and<br />

sources cited. Sterl<strong>in</strong>g’s much-admired fables may be based <strong>in</strong> part on a<br />

document fabricated by <strong>the</strong> CIA to test <strong>the</strong> veracity of a defector, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

circulated through <strong>the</strong> sleazy network of peddlars of planted “<strong>in</strong>telligence<br />

leaks.” See Alexander Cockburn, Nation, Aug. 17, 1985.<br />

61. For Reasons of State, 31-37, cit<strong>in</strong>g documents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pentagon Papers.<br />

62. M<strong>in</strong>utes summariz<strong>in</strong>g PPS 51, April 1949, cited by Michael Schaller,<br />

“Secur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Great Crescent: Occupied Japan and <strong>the</strong> Orig<strong>in</strong>s of<br />

Conta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia,” J. of American History, Sept. 1982; <strong>the</strong><br />

study also suggested that “some diversification of <strong>the</strong>ir economies”<br />

should be permitted. For fuller development of this topic, see Schaller;<br />

essays by John Dower and Richard Du Boff <strong>in</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong> and Howard<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>n, eds., Critical Essays, vol. 5 of <strong>the</strong> Pentagon Papers (Beacon,<br />

1972); For Reasons of State, chapter 1, V.<br />

63. Perk<strong>in</strong>s, I, 131, 167, 176f. The last phrase is Perk<strong>in</strong>s’s summary of “a<br />

widespread, nay, almost general, viewpo<strong>in</strong>t” among European statesmen.<br />

64. See For Reasons of State, 37; PEHR, II; TNCW; Joel Charny and John<br />

Spragens, Obstacles to Recovery <strong>in</strong> Vietnam and Kampuchea: U.S.<br />

Embargo of Humanitarian Aid (Oxfam America, 1984).<br />

65. At War with Asia, 286.<br />

66. On this matter, see PEHR, II, 2.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!