25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

408<br />

45. Krehm, Democracies and Tyrannies, 121.<br />

46. LaFeber, Inevitable Revolutions, 78f. On <strong>the</strong> same phenomenon with<br />

regard to petroleum policy, see TNCW, and with regard to US policy <strong>in</strong><br />

Asia, At War with Asia, chapter 1. More generally, see Kolko, Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

Currents; Stephen Krasner, Defend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> National Interest (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton,<br />

1978).<br />

47. Kolko, Politics of War, 471.<br />

48. William Roger Louis, Imperialism at Bay (Oxford, 1978), 481.<br />

49. This and what follows is drawn from an illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g study by Melvyn<br />

Leffler, “The American Conception of National Security and <strong>the</strong><br />

Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Cold War, 1945-48,” AHR Forum, American Historical<br />

Review, April 1984.<br />

50. Kolko, Politics of War.<br />

51. Samuel Hunt<strong>in</strong>gton, <strong>in</strong> M. J. Crozier, S. P. Hunt<strong>in</strong>gton and J. Watanuki,<br />

The Crisis of Democracy (NYU, 1975), report of <strong>the</strong> Trilateral<br />

Commission. On this commission, see Holly Sklar, ed. Trilateralism<br />

(South End, 1980) and TNCW.<br />

52. Shoup and M<strong>in</strong>ter, Imperial Bra<strong>in</strong> Trust; see TNCW for a brief review.<br />

See Robert Schulz<strong>in</strong>ger, The Wise Men of Foreign Affairs (Columbia,<br />

1984), a much more superficial conventional history that omits <strong>the</strong><br />

crucial material Shoup and M<strong>in</strong>ter discuss while cit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “official<br />

rebuttal” by William Bundy, which condemned <strong>the</strong>m for “selectivity”<br />

(Foreign Affairs, October, 1977). Both Bundy and Shulz<strong>in</strong>ger dismiss <strong>the</strong><br />

Shoup and M<strong>in</strong>ter study without analysis as a paranoid vision<br />

comparable to that of <strong>the</strong> Far Right. Their important study was o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

ignored. Standard histories also ignore Kennan’s positions cited here, as<br />

do his memoirs. On <strong>the</strong> wartime and early postwar period, see especially<br />

Kolko, Politics of War, Gabriel and Joyce Kolko, The Limits of Power<br />

(Harper & Row, 1972), two sem<strong>in</strong>al contributions to a large literature.<br />

53. See For Reasons of State, chapter 1, V, for references and discussion.<br />

54. James Chace, “How ‘Moral’ Can We Get,” NYT magaz<strong>in</strong>e, May 22,<br />

1977.<br />

55. See TNCW, chapter 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!