25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Challenge Ahead<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

386<br />

described as ‘‘self-defense.”<br />

The limited successes of <strong>the</strong> peace movement are now often heralded<br />

as a triumph of American democracy. That is hardly accurate, for two<br />

basic reasons. First, consider what was not achieved. There was barely<br />

a peep of protest when <strong>the</strong> US provided <strong>the</strong> essential means for <strong>the</strong><br />

French war of conquest, f<strong>in</strong>ally com<strong>in</strong>g close to us<strong>in</strong>g nuclear weapons,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n underm<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> political accords and launched a campaign of<br />

violent terrorism while block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> political settlement sought on all<br />

sides. By <strong>the</strong> time protest reached a noticeable level, perhaps a million<br />

Vietnamese had already been killed <strong>in</strong> almost two decades of USorganized<br />

terror and violence. That protest, fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, was largely<br />

directed aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> attack on North Vietnam, which carried risks of<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational war, hence a threat to us. The true nature of <strong>the</strong> US war<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st South Vietnam was never widely understood, a crucial fact with<br />

implications that persist, play<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir part <strong>in</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cruel<br />

postwar policies aimed at maximiz<strong>in</strong>g suffer<strong>in</strong>g and repression <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

countries we devastated. Protest reached a truly significant level when<br />

<strong>the</strong> US had expanded its aggression to all of Indoch<strong>in</strong>a, with ½ million<br />

troops fight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> South Vietnam. While <strong>the</strong> popular movement that<br />

escaped <strong>the</strong> bounds of <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>al system was effective, this alleged<br />

“triumph of democracy” never<strong>the</strong>less left three countries utterly <strong>in</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s<br />

with many millions dead, hardly an occasion for great selfcongratulation.<br />

Secondly, <strong>the</strong> successes of <strong>the</strong> peace movement were largely<br />

achieved outside of <strong>the</strong> system of formal political democracy, by direct<br />

action, which raised <strong>the</strong> cost of aggression. Without <strong>the</strong>se actions,<br />

lobby<strong>in</strong>g of Congress, letter writ<strong>in</strong>g, political campaign<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> like<br />

would have proceeded endlessly with as much effect as <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>in</strong><br />

1964, when <strong>the</strong> American people voted overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

escalation of <strong>the</strong> war <strong>in</strong> Vietnam, vot<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> candidate who at that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!