25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Challenge Ahead<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

356<br />

which have been replayed over and over s<strong>in</strong>ce President Andrew<br />

Jackson “became <strong>the</strong> first U.S. President to send troops to break a<br />

strike, while all levels of government largely decl<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>terfere with<br />

employers ‘rights’ to dismiss, spy upon, or blacklist any worker <strong>the</strong>y<br />

chose . . . American history is replete with examples of bus<strong>in</strong>ess groups<br />

and <strong>in</strong>dividual firms reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vast arrays of military and paramilitary<br />

forces for long periods of time.” 17 The significant po<strong>in</strong>t, Ferguson<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues, is that<br />

In <strong>in</strong>dustrial societies perhaps <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle most important and<br />

obvious dimension to exam<strong>in</strong>e [<strong>in</strong> respect to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests served<br />

by public policy] is state policy toward <strong>the</strong> “secondary”<br />

organizations of <strong>the</strong> citizenry. By far <strong>the</strong> most important of such<br />

organizations, of course, are labor unions. Though most<br />

discussions of American “democracy” elide <strong>the</strong> often ugly facts,<br />

<strong>the</strong> truth is that if employers are allowed untrammelled rights to<br />

destroy organizations created by <strong>the</strong>ir laborers <strong>the</strong>n claims about<br />

‘‘citizen sovereignty’’ are merely cynical rationalizations for elite<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestor dom<strong>in</strong>ance whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Poland <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s,<br />

Massachusetts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1850s, Pennsylvania before <strong>the</strong> New Deal,<br />

or much of <strong>the</strong> South and West today.<br />

One expression of <strong>the</strong> current phase of <strong>the</strong> attack on democracy is a<br />

form of Newspeak devised for <strong>the</strong> 1980 and 1984 elections: <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

<strong>the</strong> term “special <strong>in</strong>terests” with reference to work<strong>in</strong>g people, women,<br />

<strong>the</strong> aged, <strong>the</strong> handicapped, ethnic groups, etc.; <strong>in</strong> short, <strong>the</strong> population<br />

at large. Only one group does not achieve <strong>the</strong> rank of “special <strong>in</strong>terests”:<br />

<strong>the</strong> corporate elite. The Democrats are <strong>the</strong> party of <strong>the</strong> “special<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests,” <strong>the</strong> Reaganites charged, while <strong>the</strong> Republicans had no such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!