25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Challenge Ahead<br />

1. The “Conservative” Counterattack<br />

1.1 Confront<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Threat of Democracy at Home<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

346<br />

O<br />

f <strong>the</strong> various reasons advanced for <strong>the</strong> unwill<strong>in</strong>gness of <strong>the</strong> “true<br />

democrats” to take part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> political system <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua, one<br />

has a r<strong>in</strong>g of credibility: <strong>the</strong>ir allegation that <strong>the</strong> Sand<strong>in</strong>istas<br />

exerted too much control over domestic <strong>in</strong>stitutions for <strong>the</strong>m to have a<br />

fair chance. There is merit <strong>in</strong> this argument, despite <strong>the</strong> access to <strong>the</strong><br />

public granted <strong>the</strong>m by electoral law and <strong>the</strong> advantages result<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir private power and external support. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>re is merit<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument that pr<strong>in</strong>cipled critics of public or private state capitalist<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions are effectively excluded from <strong>the</strong> political system when<br />

control over <strong>the</strong> economy and communications is concentrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

hands of a small elite of owners and managers with essentially shared<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States. Under <strong>the</strong>se conditions, <strong>the</strong> bounds of<br />

political action are narrow, even when <strong>the</strong>re is no resort to state violence<br />

to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y are not transgressed.<br />

It has long been understood that democratic forms are of limited<br />

significance (and are <strong>the</strong>refore quite safe) when isolated <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

confront systems of concentrated power alone. Mean<strong>in</strong>gful democracy<br />

presupposes <strong>the</strong> ability of ord<strong>in</strong>ary people to pool <strong>the</strong>ir limited resources,<br />

to form and develop ideas and programs, put <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> political<br />

agenda, and act to support <strong>the</strong>m. In <strong>the</strong> absence of organizational<br />

structures and resources that make this possible, democracy amounts to<br />

<strong>the</strong> option of choos<strong>in</strong>g among candidates who represent <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of<br />

one or ano<strong>the</strong>r group that has an <strong>in</strong>dependent power base, generally <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> private economy. The conclusion is all <strong>the</strong> more valid when central<br />

areas of decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g are excluded <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple from <strong>the</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!