25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Race to Destruction<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

338<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration changed <strong>the</strong> emphasis of <strong>the</strong> military assistance program<br />

from “hemispheric defense” to “<strong>in</strong>ternal security”—mean<strong>in</strong>g war aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own populations. Given <strong>the</strong> realities of US dom<strong>in</strong>ance, this meant,<br />

<strong>in</strong> effect, that “<strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> American military role was changed from<br />

‘hemispheric defense’ to ‘<strong>in</strong>ternal security’,” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> words of Charles<br />

Maechl<strong>in</strong>g, who led counter<strong>in</strong>surgency and <strong>in</strong>ternal defense plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from 1961 to 1966. 97 In <strong>the</strong> light of its consequences, this was one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> most significant decisions of recent history, one little noted here.<br />

This decision, Maechl<strong>in</strong>g notes, represented a change from toleration “of<br />

<strong>the</strong> rapacity and cruelty of <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> American military” to “direct<br />

complicity” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir crimes, to US support of “<strong>the</strong> methods of He<strong>in</strong>rich<br />

Himmler’s exterm<strong>in</strong>ation squads.” The consequences, as we have seen,<br />

were horrendous, as much of Lat<strong>in</strong> America was turned <strong>in</strong>to a torture<br />

chamber under a rash of National Security States as a result, <strong>in</strong><br />

significant measure, of US policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The same phenomenon is<br />

notable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> current phase of military expansion.<br />

Elsewhere too, <strong>the</strong> consequences of <strong>the</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>tervention</strong>ism that goes<br />

hand-<strong>in</strong>-hand with militarization of <strong>the</strong> domestic economy have been<br />

grim. Ruth Sivard counts up 125 or more military conflicts s<strong>in</strong>ce World<br />

War II, 95% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Third World, <strong>in</strong> most cases <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g foreign forces,<br />

with “western powers account<strong>in</strong>g for 79 percent of <strong>the</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>tervention</strong>s,<br />

communist for 6 percent.” Even if not taken too literally, such figures<br />

should give us pause. The toll is <strong>in</strong>calculable. In Indoch<strong>in</strong>a alone, a<br />

standard Western estimate is that about 500,000 were killed by <strong>the</strong><br />

French <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir US-backed war, and one recent estimate is that deaths<br />

from 1965 may have been 3 million or more. Add to this perhaps<br />

170,000 killed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous ten years of US terror and some 1/2<br />

million to 1 million killed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> US wars <strong>in</strong> Laos and Cambodia,<br />

and we have perhaps 4 million or more killed, a respectable<br />

achievement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> days before we fell victim to <strong>the</strong> “sickly <strong>in</strong>hibitions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!