25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Race to Destruction<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

326<br />

“coord<strong>in</strong>ator of last resort” when “managers are unable to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a<br />

high level of aggregate demand.” The wartime experience led General<br />

Electric president Charles E. Wilson to propose a “permanent war<br />

economy” <strong>in</strong> 1944. Ano<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>ess historian, Joseph Monsen, notes<br />

that enlightened corporate managers, far from fear<strong>in</strong>g government<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>tervention</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, view “<strong>the</strong> New Economics as a technique<br />

for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g corporate viability.” 82<br />

For a variety of reasons, <strong>the</strong> device that best serves <strong>the</strong> needs of<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g power and privilege is what is sometimes called “military<br />

Keynesianism”: <strong>the</strong> creation of a state-guaranteed market for high<br />

technology rapidly-obsolesc<strong>in</strong>g waste production, mean<strong>in</strong>g armaments.<br />

Their Keynesian advisers assured Truman and Kennedy that military<br />

production was unproblematic. Leon Keyserl<strong>in</strong>g endorsed <strong>the</strong> warlike—<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact, ra<strong>the</strong>r hysterical—conclusions of NSC 68, and Paul Samuelson<br />

<strong>in</strong>formed President Kennedy that military spend<strong>in</strong>g, “if deemed desirable<br />

for its own sake can only help ra<strong>the</strong>r than h<strong>in</strong>der <strong>the</strong> health of our<br />

economy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period immediately ahead.” 83 Although Reagan<br />

professes a “conservative” ideology, <strong>in</strong> fact he and his advisers are<br />

committed partisans of Keynesian methods to stimulate production<br />

through <strong>the</strong> military system and to <strong>in</strong>crease demand by cutt<strong>in</strong>g taxes.<br />

The recovery from <strong>the</strong> deep recession <strong>in</strong>duced by <strong>the</strong> Reagan<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration was “a classical Keynesian recovery,” <strong>in</strong>vestment banker<br />

Felix Rohatyn observes, “stimulated by tax cuts and huge amounts of<br />

government spend<strong>in</strong>g—especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> military area . . .” 84<br />

There are surely more efficient and less dangerous techniques of<br />

economic management than military spend<strong>in</strong>g. Why, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> regular<br />

recourse to this device? The basic reason is that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

alternatives do not serve to enhance exist<strong>in</strong>g privilege and power as does<br />

<strong>the</strong> creation of a state-guaranteed market for high technology<br />

production—that is, <strong>the</strong> military system—which is why <strong>the</strong> latter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!