25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Race to Destruction<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

274<br />

widened, perhaps nuclear conflict, and similar concerns may have<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited each of <strong>the</strong> superpowers on o<strong>the</strong>r occasions as well. Suppose<br />

that reduction of <strong>the</strong> deterrent capacity would tend to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong><br />

aggressiveness of one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> superpowers, not an unlikely<br />

consequence. Then it would <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> likelihood of superpower<br />

conflict, and with it, <strong>the</strong> likelihood of nuclear war. It is not obvious that<br />

<strong>the</strong> prospects for peace and survival are enhanced significantly, or<br />

perhaps at all, by efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals if such moves are<br />

not an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of a more general program to constra<strong>in</strong> state<br />

violence. 11<br />

It should be mentioned that much of <strong>the</strong> study of nuclear deterrence<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> West is of limited relevance, because it is restricted to <strong>the</strong><br />

problem of deterr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> USSR, omitt<strong>in</strong>g as unth<strong>in</strong>kable <strong>the</strong><br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g question that arises with regard to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r superpower.<br />

We would doubtless f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> mirror image <strong>in</strong> Soviet books and journals.<br />

The disarmament movement—particularly those elements <strong>in</strong> it that<br />

can ga<strong>in</strong> media attention—has concentrated on demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

awesome consequences of nuclear war and on various plans to halt or<br />

reverse <strong>the</strong> arms race. One might feel that <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong>se endeavors is<br />

an <strong>in</strong>sult to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence, but perhaps those who judge o<strong>the</strong>rwise are<br />

correct. If so, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> task of reiterat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> obvious is an important<br />

one. The second l<strong>in</strong>e of action is also highly important, though not, <strong>in</strong><br />

my op<strong>in</strong>ion, for <strong>the</strong> reasons generally adduced; I will return to that. But<br />

<strong>the</strong> most significant issues may well lie elsewhere.<br />

If we are concerned to avert nuclear war, our primary concern should<br />

be to lessen tensions and conflicts at <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts where superpower<br />

confrontation is likely to develop, <strong>the</strong> Third World pos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

threat. There has rarely been a serious likelihood of war break<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

over European issues, though propagandistic exploitation of <strong>the</strong><br />

superpower conflict to achieve o<strong>the</strong>r ends has led to concentration on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!