25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Race to Destruction<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

271<br />

concern is “radical nationalism,” which, it is feared, might threaten US<br />

control over <strong>the</strong>se resources. “Radical nationalism” is ano<strong>the</strong>r of those<br />

curious terms of US political <strong>the</strong>ology—like “Communism,” “stability,”<br />

“conta<strong>in</strong>ment,” “democracy,” “aggression,” etc.—with technical<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs only dimly related to <strong>the</strong>ir normal sense: <strong>in</strong> this case, <strong>the</strong><br />

reference is to nationalist movements that do not obey orders, whatever<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir political complexion may be, as opposed to “moderate<br />

nationalism,” properly obedient. US relations with Israel, unique <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational affairs, have always been closely related to <strong>the</strong>se concerns.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> structure of military <strong>in</strong>stallations designed to deter <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>digenous threat also faces <strong>the</strong> USSR, to ensure that <strong>the</strong>re will be no<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference from that direction <strong>in</strong> a core region of <strong>the</strong> US global<br />

system. 6 A 1983 US Air Force Publication describes <strong>the</strong> nuclear<br />

weapons mission <strong>in</strong> Turkey as “<strong>in</strong> an aggressive growth stage,” with<br />

nuclear-armed aircraft on “alert” status, ready to strike Soviet targets. 7<br />

The same planners who have placed <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g US nuclear arsenal <strong>in</strong><br />

Turkey on alert warn us that Nicaragua, even Grenada, is a threat to our<br />

very existence, compell<strong>in</strong>g us to take aggressive action of a sort that<br />

might lead to nuclear war. And <strong>the</strong>ir assessment is widely shared, yet<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r reflection of <strong>the</strong> paranoid fever of what passes for <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

life.<br />

The US now has more than 13,000 nuclear weapons capable of<br />

strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> USSR, over 11,000 of <strong>the</strong>m classified as “strategic”; <strong>the</strong><br />

USSR can explode about 8500 nuclear weapons on <strong>the</strong> United States.<br />

The US arsenal rose from about 4000 to 9200 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1970s while<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet arsenal <strong>in</strong>creased from about 2000 to 6500. France and<br />

England have about 1000 additional nuclear weapons targeted aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, and <strong>the</strong>ir arsenals are rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. NATO has<br />

always outspent <strong>the</strong> Warsaw Pact on armaments by a considerable<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>, even by <strong>the</strong> US government figures, which have a built-<strong>in</strong> bias

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!