25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

263<br />

helped to establish and have s<strong>in</strong>ce ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, that grew <strong>in</strong>evitably out<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence and paramilitary apparatus we constructed <strong>in</strong> our<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest and <strong>the</strong> social conditions breed<strong>in</strong>g dissidence and revolt that are<br />

<strong>in</strong> significant measure our legacy.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>junction to persist “regardless of how many are murdered” goes<br />

a long step beyond <strong>the</strong> racist press of <strong>the</strong> turn of <strong>the</strong> century. In fact, it<br />

is not easy to f<strong>in</strong>d a historical counterpart; perhaps <strong>the</strong> Nazi archives<br />

might yield examples. As <strong>the</strong> right-w<strong>in</strong>g moved to overturn <strong>the</strong> reformist<br />

coup <strong>in</strong> El Salvador with US back<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> late 1979, Colonel Vides<br />

Casanova, <strong>the</strong>n commander of <strong>the</strong> National Guard and now M<strong>in</strong>ister of<br />

Defense under <strong>the</strong> Duarte government, rem<strong>in</strong>ded civilians <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> junta<br />

that “<strong>in</strong> 1932 <strong>the</strong> country had survived <strong>the</strong> kill<strong>in</strong>g of 30,000 peasants.<br />

‘Today, <strong>the</strong> armed forces are prepared to kill 200,000-300,000, if<br />

that’s what it takes to stop a Communist takeover’.” 209 But will<strong>in</strong>gness to<br />

kill two or three hundred thousand still falls short of <strong>the</strong> advice of <strong>the</strong><br />

New Republic editors that we must proceed “regardless of how many<br />

are murdered.” A closer counterpart is a statement attributed to <strong>the</strong><br />

Khmer Rouge by François Ponchaud and widely publicized <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1970s as proof that its leadership matches or surpasses Hitler and<br />

Stal<strong>in</strong>: <strong>the</strong> statement that one or two million people would be enough to<br />

build <strong>the</strong> new Kampuchea, so that <strong>the</strong> rest could be elim<strong>in</strong>ated. This<br />

proved to be a fabrication, 210 but at least it does come closer to <strong>the</strong><br />

advice to proceed “regardless of how many are murdered,” though it still<br />

falls short.<br />

The sentiments <strong>the</strong>mselves are remarkable enough; still more<br />

<strong>in</strong>structive, perhaps, is that <strong>the</strong>y pass without comment, as apparently<br />

entirely normal. 211<br />

As <strong>the</strong> record clearly shows, what we are do<strong>in</strong>g today <strong>in</strong> Central<br />

America, and <strong>the</strong> reaction to it, breaks little new ground, apart from<br />

scale. There should be no surprise over <strong>the</strong> undisguised pleasure so

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!