25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

231<br />

economic blackmail <strong>in</strong> flagrant violation of <strong>the</strong> 1907 treaty”—and when<br />

sugar prices collapsed after World War I, <strong>the</strong> Military Government<br />

floated loans to f<strong>in</strong>ance its operations, which <strong>the</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>icans were<br />

compelled to assume under <strong>the</strong> 1924 evacuation treaty. In <strong>the</strong> end,<br />

about half of <strong>the</strong> meager public works program was ultimately paid, with<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest, by <strong>the</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>icans <strong>the</strong>mselves. Far more significant was <strong>the</strong> US<br />

takeover of <strong>the</strong> economy. The land laws promulgated by <strong>the</strong> Military<br />

Government were designed “to permit U.S. sugar concerns to get legal<br />

title to huge tracts of land. It was enforced with great zeal: Dom<strong>in</strong>ican<br />

peasants were driven off <strong>the</strong>ir lands and Dom<strong>in</strong>ican villages burned for<br />

<strong>the</strong> benefit of foreign—mostly American—sugar companies.” When US<br />

troops f<strong>in</strong>ally withdrew <strong>in</strong> 1924, sugar companies owned nearly a<br />

quarter of <strong>the</strong> agricultural area of <strong>the</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic, about 2% of<br />

it owned by Dom<strong>in</strong>icans, most of <strong>the</strong> rest by US companies. Americans<br />

controlled property worth about $33.7 million, <strong>the</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>icans less than<br />

$1.4 million. By 1925, exports <strong>in</strong> sugar and sugar derivatives reached<br />

63% of total exports, profit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> foreign <strong>in</strong>vestor but not <strong>the</strong> local<br />

economy. The tariff structure was designed to favor US goods,<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g protection for Dom<strong>in</strong>ican production so that “many local<br />

crafts and <strong>in</strong>dustries were ru<strong>in</strong>ed.” “The only Dom<strong>in</strong>ican product favored<br />

by <strong>the</strong> American-made tariff of 1919 was sugar—an American-owned<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry.” 164<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> counter<strong>in</strong>surgency war, Calder cont<strong>in</strong>ues, <strong>the</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

whose “behavior was often brutish by traditional Dom<strong>in</strong>ican standards,”<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e-gunned peasants, raped, tortured, destroyed houses,<br />

imprisoned many people and sent many more to concentration camps<br />

(provid<strong>in</strong>g a captive labor supply for <strong>the</strong> sugar plantations), bombed and<br />

strafed “apparently as much to <strong>in</strong>timidate <strong>the</strong> populace with a show of<br />

power as to harm <strong>the</strong> guerrillas,” and generally abused <strong>the</strong> “spigs” and<br />

“niggers,” as <strong>the</strong>y were regularly called, undertak<strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong> Military

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!