25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

220<br />

elections. 147 In report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Salvadoran election, <strong>the</strong> Times relied<br />

overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly on US and Salvadoran officials. The rebels were<br />

occasionally cited, but primarily with regard to <strong>the</strong>ir disruption plans.<br />

They were also permitted to describe <strong>the</strong> election as a “farce,” but never<br />

to expand on <strong>the</strong> reasons. In dramatic contrast, <strong>the</strong> opposition <strong>in</strong><br />

Nicaragua was cited extensively and given ample opportunity to expla<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir objections to <strong>the</strong> planned elections. US officials and <strong>the</strong><br />

Nicaraguan opposition provided over 80% of <strong>the</strong> direct citations, and<br />

constituted 60% of <strong>the</strong> sources cited (mean<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re was some<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct reference to <strong>the</strong> Sand<strong>in</strong>istas). In contrast, US and Salvadoran<br />

officials provided virtually all of <strong>the</strong> direct citations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong><br />

Salvadoran elections (with <strong>the</strong> exception noted above, which re<strong>in</strong>forced<br />

<strong>the</strong> government case) and 80% of total sources (peasants constituted<br />

0.8%).<br />

Choice of topics reflected <strong>the</strong> same New York Times agenda. The<br />

number of articles referr<strong>in</strong>g to freedom of <strong>the</strong> press, organizational<br />

freedom and limits on opposition candidates was zero <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong><br />

Salvadoran elections, whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> Nicaraguan elections,<br />

75% of <strong>the</strong> articles discussed freedom of <strong>the</strong> press, 50% discussed<br />

organizational freedom, and 62.5% discussed limits on candidates. The<br />

power of <strong>the</strong> armed forces to coerce was discussed <strong>in</strong> 37.5% of <strong>the</strong><br />

articles on <strong>the</strong> Nicaraguan election, <strong>in</strong> 3.6% of <strong>the</strong> articles on <strong>the</strong><br />

Salvadoran election. To fully appreciate this illustration of media servility<br />

to state power, one must bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that abuses of freedom of press,<br />

organizational freedom and candidate opportunities were vastly more<br />

severe <strong>in</strong> El Salvador, and that <strong>the</strong> direct role of <strong>the</strong> armed forces <strong>in</strong><br />

coercion was also far greater. There were also falsehoods <strong>in</strong> press<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g, but <strong>the</strong>ir impact is m<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong> comparison to <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se more <strong>in</strong>direct methods of thought control, characteristic of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!