25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

187<br />

guerrillas and <strong>the</strong>ir allied political organizations,” <strong>the</strong> latter be<strong>in</strong>g “much<br />

more important than <strong>the</strong> former” at <strong>the</strong> time. 86 The popular<br />

organizations—“<strong>the</strong> only social force capable of resolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> crisis” <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> words of <strong>the</strong> assass<strong>in</strong>ated Archbishop—were effectively elim<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

by means that merit comparison to Pol Pot but are regarded here as<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r a great success or an unfortunate error. But <strong>the</strong> usual<br />

consequence ensued: people jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> guerrillas, who became a<br />

significant force, sure proof that <strong>the</strong> Russians are com<strong>in</strong>g. The Reagan<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration attempted to demonstrate this necessary truth <strong>in</strong> its<br />

February 1981 White Paper. This was ridiculed abroad, <strong>in</strong>itially<br />

accepted at home. But a strong popular opposition caused <strong>the</strong><br />

government to back down from its moves towards expanded US<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>tervention</strong>, fear<strong>in</strong>g that it would prejudice o<strong>the</strong>r programs such as <strong>the</strong><br />

planned military build-up, and segments of <strong>the</strong> media <strong>the</strong>n undertook an<br />

analysis of <strong>the</strong> White Paper, quickly show<strong>in</strong>g that it was based on severe<br />

misrepresentation and that <strong>the</strong> actual documents revealed virtually<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g, perhaps a trickle of arms beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> September 1980—that<br />

is, well after Carter’s Matanza II was underway. The documents revealed<br />

<strong>the</strong> unwill<strong>in</strong>gness of <strong>the</strong> USSR and particularly Nicaragua to permit arms<br />

shipments, and chronic shortage of arms on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> guerrillas. 87<br />

The State Department conceded that <strong>the</strong> US has not <strong>in</strong>tercepted “a<br />

sizable number of weapons” s<strong>in</strong>ce February 1981; <strong>in</strong> fact, <strong>the</strong><br />

government has provided no credible evidence of significant weapons<br />

shipments or of Nicaraguan government <strong>in</strong>volvement, despite extensive<br />

surveillance. Intelligence analysts dismiss government claims as<br />

“ludicrous,” and <strong>the</strong> Pentagon refuses to release documents to support<br />

official claims. 88 In July 1984, a State Department “Background Paper”<br />

was circulated to try to help <strong>the</strong> government case, though without<br />

enthusiasm, because, as <strong>the</strong> press reported, it was virtually lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!