25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

178<br />

Duarte’s 1985 apologetics for <strong>the</strong> massacres conducted by <strong>the</strong><br />

government over which he presides conform to his regular practice. After<br />

<strong>the</strong> slaughter at Rio Sumpul, Duarte stated that about 300 were killed,<br />

all of <strong>the</strong>m “Communist guerrillas”—<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, presumably, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants<br />

sliced to pieces with machetes. When <strong>the</strong> army killed 20 civilians <strong>in</strong><br />

January 1983, some after torture, Duarte claimed <strong>the</strong>y had been killed<br />

<strong>in</strong> a “battle”; that <strong>the</strong>y had been murdered <strong>in</strong> scattered locations was<br />

confirmed by <strong>the</strong> press and a diplomat who <strong>in</strong>vestigated. In <strong>the</strong> case of<br />

<strong>the</strong> massacres at Los Llanitos and <strong>the</strong> Guals<strong>in</strong>ga river (see chapter 1,<br />

3.2), Duarte denied <strong>the</strong> facts or blamed <strong>the</strong> guerrillas. He promised an<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation of <strong>the</strong> Los Llanitos massacre, but nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> survivors who<br />

had been <strong>in</strong>terviewed by Church <strong>in</strong>vestigators, nor <strong>the</strong> journalists who<br />

looked <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> massacre, nor Americas Watch were ever approached.<br />

Duarte did not release <strong>the</strong> report of <strong>the</strong> alleged <strong>in</strong>vestigation, but<br />

claimed that it produced no evidence of military abuses. He conducted<br />

no <strong>in</strong>vestigation of <strong>the</strong> Guals<strong>in</strong>ga River massacre, but denounced <strong>the</strong><br />

“terrorists” for “us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> masses as shields and . . . to provoke,<br />

expos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se people to be killed”; “This is horrible. This is <strong>in</strong>human.<br />

But this is not my problem. It’s <strong>the</strong> problem of <strong>the</strong> subversives’ terrorist<br />

actions and <strong>the</strong>y have to be responsible,” not <strong>the</strong> perpetrators of <strong>the</strong><br />

massacre aga<strong>in</strong>st defenseless civilians. The surviv<strong>in</strong>g victims see it<br />

differently: “Duarte’s men went after our children, and now he’ll go on<br />

television to say he didn’t do it,” a survivor of <strong>the</strong> Los Llanitos massacre<br />

commented bitterly. 71<br />

No less startl<strong>in</strong>g was Duarte’s denial that <strong>the</strong>re were any bodies at El<br />

Playón and his claim that stories about this charnel house were<br />

“fabricated.” This was after <strong>the</strong> press had discovered what even Elliott<br />

Abrams conceded was a “hellish place,” an “<strong>in</strong>famous body dump”—<br />

though Abrams accompanied <strong>the</strong> admission with transparent falsehoods<br />

about army <strong>in</strong>nocence. What reporters found <strong>in</strong> El Playón was “a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!