25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patterns of Intervention<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

148<br />

The Adm<strong>in</strong>istration has also made it pla<strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> use of US military<br />

force will be considered if o<strong>the</strong>r measures fail. Secretary of State Shultz<br />

stated that if Congress did not provide assistance to <strong>the</strong> contras, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong> US would eventually have to make “an agoniz<strong>in</strong>g choice about <strong>the</strong><br />

use of American combat troops,” and Langhorne Motley, <strong>the</strong>n Assistant<br />

Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, <strong>in</strong>formed a House<br />

committee <strong>in</strong> closed session that failure to provide aid for <strong>the</strong> contras<br />

would place <strong>the</strong> US “<strong>in</strong> an accommodationist or military response<br />

dilemma at some later date when <strong>the</strong> threat to US <strong>in</strong>terests becomes<br />

more obvious and when <strong>the</strong> only effective response would be on a larger<br />

scale or <strong>in</strong> less favorable circumstances.” He referred specifically to<br />

direct US military <strong>in</strong>volvement. 21 S<strong>in</strong>ce we evidently cannot adopt <strong>the</strong><br />

“accommodationist” horn of <strong>the</strong> dilemma, as even <strong>the</strong> Democratic<br />

opposition generally agrees, we must prepare to use military force unless<br />

our mercenary armies can overthrow <strong>the</strong> government—or at least make<br />

<strong>the</strong> country bleed sufficiently so that it no longer poses a threat to <strong>the</strong><br />

Fifth Freedom, always <strong>the</strong> tacit pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.<br />

These warn<strong>in</strong>gs about an eventual <strong>in</strong>vasion are simply ano<strong>the</strong>r stage<br />

<strong>in</strong> what a classified Pentagon document <strong>in</strong> 1983 called a “‘perception<br />

management’ program . . . designed to keep <strong>the</strong> Nicaraguans concerned<br />

that <strong>the</strong> United States might attack.” The regular large-scale US military<br />

maneuvers on <strong>the</strong> border are part of <strong>the</strong> same program, accord<strong>in</strong>g to this<br />

document, though <strong>the</strong>y also serve to establish US bases by subterfuge to<br />

ensure <strong>the</strong> militarization of Honduras under a facade of “democracy.”<br />

Sonic booms over Managua have <strong>the</strong> same goal, <strong>the</strong> Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

noted. The purpose is expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a State Department official: “Every<br />

time <strong>the</strong>re’s an <strong>in</strong>vasion scare, <strong>the</strong>y make some concessions.” 22<br />

From <strong>the</strong> start, <strong>the</strong> Somozist leaders of <strong>the</strong> US proxy army have made<br />

it clear that “<strong>the</strong> goal of <strong>the</strong>ir organization has been to topple <strong>the</strong><br />

government of Nicaragua. They scoff at past statements by <strong>the</strong> Reagan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!