25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Fifth Freedom<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

105<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> Monroe Doctr<strong>in</strong>e, consistent with <strong>the</strong> Wilson<br />

corollary: <strong>the</strong> Doctr<strong>in</strong>e meant “that we not only refuse to tolerate foreign<br />

colonization, control, or <strong>the</strong> extension of a foreign political system to our<br />

hemisphere, but we take alarm from <strong>the</strong> appearance on <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ent of<br />

foreign ideologies, commercial exploitation, cartel arrangements, or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

symptoms of <strong>in</strong>creased non-hemispheric <strong>in</strong>fluence.” The US must have<br />

“a stable, secure, and friendly flank to <strong>the</strong> South, not confused by enemy<br />

penetration, political, economic or military.” The prime concern was not<br />

<strong>the</strong> USSR but ra<strong>the</strong>r Europe, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of arms by <strong>the</strong> British to<br />

Chile and Ecuador, by Sweden to Argent<strong>in</strong>a, and by France to Argent<strong>in</strong>a<br />

and Brazil.<br />

From January 1945, military and civilian officials of <strong>the</strong> War and<br />

Navy departments argued for an extensive system of US bases,<br />

curtailment of all foreign military aid and military sales, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

American military officers and supply of arms to Lat<strong>in</strong> America by <strong>the</strong><br />

US under a comprehensive military assistance program. While lay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>se plans for “our little region over here which never has bo<strong>the</strong>red<br />

anybody,” <strong>the</strong> US was <strong>in</strong> no mood to allow o<strong>the</strong>rs similar rights<br />

elsewhere, certa<strong>in</strong>ly not <strong>the</strong> USSR. Secretary of State Byrnes <strong>in</strong> fact<br />

objected to <strong>the</strong>se plans for Lat<strong>in</strong> America because it might prejudice US<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives elsewhere that he regarded as more important, <strong>in</strong> particular,<br />

<strong>in</strong> Greece and Turkey, which “are our outposts”—on <strong>the</strong> borders of <strong>the</strong><br />

USSR, which had far more serious security concerns than <strong>the</strong> US. The<br />

“outposts” were also <strong>in</strong>tended to buttress US ambitions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crucial<br />

Middle East region with its <strong>in</strong>comparable energy reserves, <strong>the</strong>n pass<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>to American hands.<br />

Comment<strong>in</strong>g on an array of material of this sort lay<strong>in</strong>g out US plans,<br />

much of it classified and recently released, Leffler notes that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

moves were made while US officials were “pay<strong>in</strong>g lip service to <strong>the</strong><br />

United Nations and worry<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> impact of regional agreements <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!