25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Fifth Freedom<br />

4. Plann<strong>in</strong>g For Global Hegemony<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

104<br />

s World War II came to an end, US ideas concern<strong>in</strong>g Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America were clarified by Secretary of War Henry Stimson (May<br />

1945), <strong>in</strong> a discussion of how we must elim<strong>in</strong>ate and dismantle<br />

all regional systems dom<strong>in</strong>ated by any o<strong>the</strong>r power, particularly <strong>the</strong><br />

British, while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and extend<strong>in</strong>g our own. With regard to Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America, he expla<strong>in</strong>ed privately: “I th<strong>in</strong>k that it’s not ask<strong>in</strong>g too much to<br />

have our little region over here [namely, Lat<strong>in</strong> America] which never has<br />

bo<strong>the</strong>red anybody.” 47<br />

A<br />

It should be noted that US officials had a ready explanation for <strong>the</strong><br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between control by <strong>the</strong> US and by o<strong>the</strong>r powers. As Abe<br />

Fortas expla<strong>in</strong>ed with regard to US trusteeship plans <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific,<br />

which Churchill regarded as a cover for annexation: “When we take over<br />

<strong>the</strong> Marianas and fortify <strong>the</strong>m we are do<strong>in</strong>g so not only on <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

our own right to do so but as part of our obligation to <strong>the</strong> security of <strong>the</strong><br />

world . . . These reservations were be<strong>in</strong>g made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest of world<br />

security ra<strong>the</strong>r than of our own security . . . what was good for us was<br />

good for <strong>the</strong> world.” 48 On such assumptions, naturally regarded highly<br />

by US officials and ideologists, quite a range of actions become<br />

legitimate.<br />

In keep<strong>in</strong>g with Stimson’s conception, <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t Chiefs of Staff,<br />

through 1945 and early 1946, <strong>in</strong>sisted that non-American forces must<br />

be kept out of <strong>the</strong> Western Hemisphere, which “is a dist<strong>in</strong>ct military<br />

entity, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrity of which is a fundamental postulate of our security <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> event of ano<strong>the</strong>r world war.” 49 In January 1947, Secretary of War<br />

Patterson added that <strong>the</strong> resources of Lat<strong>in</strong> America were essential to<br />

<strong>the</strong> US because “it is imperative that our war potential be enhanced . . .<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g any national emergency.” Patterson gave an expansive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!