25.03.2013 Views

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

Noam Chomsky - Turning the Tide U.S. intervention in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Fifth Freedom<br />

Classics <strong>in</strong> Politics: <strong>Turn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tide</strong> <strong>Noam</strong> <strong>Chomsky</strong><br />

100<br />

American <strong>in</strong>tegrity which has come out of Wash<strong>in</strong>gton.” For Roosevelt,<br />

Connell-Smith comments, “<strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant position of <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> western hemisphere was exactly like that of ‘<strong>the</strong> English speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

race’ <strong>in</strong> South Africa. Both were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of civilization.” 38<br />

Colombia not be<strong>in</strong>g a civilized nation, <strong>the</strong> chicanery <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Panama Canal robbery was entirely legitimate. The Colombians who<br />

objected to Roosevelt’s maneuvers were, after all, noth<strong>in</strong>g but “damned<br />

dagoes,” as he expla<strong>in</strong>ed, who had to be taught proper behavior. In <strong>the</strong><br />

words of one American historian, Roosevelt “made it clear how he would<br />

deal with refractory Lat<strong>in</strong> Americans; he would ‘show those Dagos that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y will have to behave decently’.” 39<br />

Woodrow Wilson took matters a step fur<strong>the</strong>r: “. . . as a Progressive<br />

he thought a good system was one that was orderly and slightly<br />

reformed—by which he came to mean replac<strong>in</strong>g European concessions<br />

with North American,” and so produced what LaFeber calls “<strong>the</strong> Wilson<br />

corollary.” 40 Wilson issued a “Declaration” extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Monroe<br />

Doctr<strong>in</strong>e to “European f<strong>in</strong>anciers and contractors” of whose acts he<br />

disapproved, that is, to European f<strong>in</strong>ancial as well as political and<br />

military <strong><strong>in</strong>tervention</strong>. The Lat<strong>in</strong> American order would rest on<br />

cooperation with “those who act <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest of peace and honor, who<br />

protect private rights,” mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> effect <strong>the</strong> rights of US bus<strong>in</strong>ess. A<br />

case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t was control over oil, just becom<strong>in</strong>g an important resource.<br />

Brita<strong>in</strong> was <strong>the</strong> major threat. Wilson’s State Department warned Costa<br />

Rica that “Department considers it most important that only approved<br />

Americans should possess oil concessions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighborhood of<br />

Panama Canal. Amory concession [British, supported by Costa Rica]<br />

does not appear to meet <strong>the</strong>se requirements.” Guatemala was warned<br />

that “It is most important that only American oil <strong>in</strong>terests receive<br />

concessions,” and US pressure ensured that this result was achieved <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Western Hemisphere, despite some mean<strong>in</strong>gless gestures designed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!