25.03.2013 Views

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. <strong>QST</strong> in patients with tendinopathy<br />

0<br />

The outcome of the present study showed a large variability in different threshold values<br />

as measured with <strong>QST</strong>. Although <strong>QST</strong> is the golden standard to measure somatosensory<br />

aberrations its success depends on the participant’s perceptions and concentration<br />

which may induce heterogeneity. Furthermore, earlier studies found hypesthesia on the<br />

affected side in some athletes this may be a subgroup and explain the large variability<br />

within the groups (Jensen et al 2008; van Wilgen & Keizer 2011).<br />

Further studies are needed to confirm whether the assessment for mechanical pain<br />

thresholds (myelinated Aδ-fibres) using standardized pinprick devices is adding to the<br />

clinical diagnosis of PT. A limitation of this study was that the diagnosis PT was based<br />

only on clinical examination by a sport medicine physician or sport physical therapist;<br />

no additional imaging techniques were used to investigate structural changes of the<br />

tendon which increases the likelihood of the diagnosis. On the other hand clinicians<br />

excluded patients with other knee pathology such as patella femoral pain syndrome,<br />

intra-articular pathology and ligament injuries. Furthermore, in the analyses of <strong>QST</strong><br />

data mostly z-score transformations of data are used to identify sensory abnormalities<br />

with respect to controls (Rolke et al 2006a). Since z-score transformation and their<br />

interpretation is highly dependent on reference values we could not include such<br />

transformation due to the low numbers of participants, therefore in future studies larger<br />

groups should be included. Despite the fact that manual pressure pain thresholds for the<br />

clinical diagnose of PT has been used, the <strong>QST</strong> results for PPT showed no significant<br />

differences between the groups. The reason may be that we included patients with a<br />

long history of PT with pain evoked by sports activities. Furthermore all patients were<br />

measured on the same spot at the patella tendon and not on the most painful spot which<br />

is used in the clinical practice. In another study we measured athletes with PT and used<br />

an algometer (MicroFET2 Biometrics BV). This algometer was shaped like a fingertip<br />

an applied on the most painful spot of the patella tendon. In this study lower PPT’s<br />

and significant differences between patients and controls were found (Kregel et al.,<br />

submitted). Looking back at this study, a similar approach would have probably yielded<br />

more pronounced differences between the patient group and the control group in our<br />

study. Another limitation was that we recruited healthy controls through advertisements<br />

on websites, this procedure might have led to selection bias. Furthermore, we did not<br />

take into account if athletes participated in sports activities the day before the study,<br />

this may have interfered with the results of the study.<br />

4.1. Conclusion<br />

This is the first study investigating somatosensory aberrations in chronic patellar<br />

tendinopathy using a standardized <strong>QST</strong> protocol. Results of this explorative study should<br />

be interpreted as such as sensitisation might play an important role in the contribution<br />

of pain during and after sports activity in PT patients.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!