Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

25.03.2013 Views

5. QST in patients with tendinopathy 2.4. Statistical analyses The data of the thirteen measurements of QST in the injured athletes were compared to the healthy controls. Since some of the QST outcomes are ordinal data and most data were non-normally divided we used non-parametric tests (Mann Whitney U). The descriptive data of the social demographic parameters are presented. Because of nonnormally divided data the SCL-90 and POMS dimensions were analyzed using nonparametric (Mann Whitney U) test to compare injured versus control athletes. 3. Results 3.1. Participants The socio-demographic data are presented in Table 5-1; twelve PT patients and 20 control athletes were included in the study. All athletes were still training and or playing matches. The outcome on the VISA-P differed significantly between patients (VISA-P 62, SD 17.97) and controls (VISA-P 99, SD 1.68). The median duration of symptoms for the PT group was 30 months (range 6 - 120). The outcome of QST assessment is presented in Table 5-2. Table 5-1: Socio demographic data of patients with a patella tendinopathy to healthy controls 3.2. QST In two of the thirteen QST parameters i.e. mechanical pain threshold and vibration disappearance threshold injured athletes were significantly more sensitive for the applied stimuli than for the control group (Table 5-2). None of the athletes showed signs of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA). The room temperature during QST testing was 23.7°C (SD 0.8).

5. QST in patients with tendinopathy Table 5-2: Results on the Mann Whitney test; comparing QST data of patients with a patella tendinopathy to healthy controls - * intensity of perception of series of 1Hz vs. single, ** numeric rating scale 0-100

5. <strong>QST</strong> in patients with tendinopathy<br />

2.4. Statistical analyses<br />

The data of the thirteen measurements of <strong>QST</strong> in the injured athletes were compared<br />

to the healthy controls. Since some of the <strong>QST</strong> outcomes are ordinal data and most<br />

data were non-normally divided we used non-parametric tests (Mann Whitney U). The<br />

descriptive data of the social demographic parameters are presented. Because of nonnormally<br />

divided data the SCL-90 and POMS dimensions were analyzed using nonparametric<br />

(Mann Whitney U) test to compare injured versus control athletes.<br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. Participants<br />

The socio-demographic data are presented in Table 5-1; twelve PT patients and 20<br />

control athletes were included in the study. All athletes were still training and or playing<br />

matches. The outcome on the VISA-P differed significantly between patients (VISA-P<br />

62, SD 17.97) and controls (VISA-P 99, SD 1.68). The median duration of symptoms<br />

for the PT group was 30 months (range 6 - 120). The outcome of <strong>QST</strong> assessment is<br />

presented in Table 5-2.<br />

Table 5-1: Socio demographic data of patients with a patella tendinopathy to healthy controls<br />

3.2. <strong>QST</strong><br />

In two of the thirteen <strong>QST</strong> parameters i.e. mechanical pain threshold and vibration<br />

disappearance threshold injured athletes were significantly more sensitive for the<br />

applied stimuli than for the control group (Table 5-2). None of the athletes showed signs<br />

of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA). The room temperature during <strong>QST</strong> testing<br />

was 23.7°C (SD 0.8).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!