Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
1. General introduction dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum occur in chronic pain (Apkarian et al 2011; DaSilva et al 2008; Geha et al 2008; Gustin et al 2011; Schweinhardt & Bushnell 2010; Tracey 2007; 2008; Tracey & Bushnell 2009; Tracey et al 2002). Precise phenotypic characterisation and imaging may be used to set objective criteria with which to measure disease and evaluate its treatment. QST phenotypic characterisation aiming to select patients for enrolment into clinical trials might decrease variance and increase the power to detect meaningful drug effects. Objectives of this thesis are to investigate: 1. Implications of QST for clinical neuropathic pain practice: a. Are there differences in the diagnostic outcome of sensory signs in patients with neuropathic pain assessed by QST and bedside tests? (chapter 2) b. Does a greater level of certainty whether a pain condition is neuropathic reflect an increase in numbers of sensory abnormalities or/and specific patterns of sensory signs? (chapter 3) 2. Implications of QST for clinical neuropathic pain research: a. Is QST valid to be used as a tool to identify somatosensory homogenous groups of patients with neuropathic pain? (chapter 4) 3. Implications of QST in non-neuropathic pain diseases: a. Is QST sensitive to identify pain-contributing somatosensory changes in patients with patellar tendinopathies? (chapter 5) To address these objectives, a large QST database including healthy volunteers and patients with neuropathic pain was established. QST data from neuropathic pain patients were compared to those obtained from healthy controls with the aim to gain insight into the presence of abnormal somatosensory function in neuropathic pain patients.
- Page 2: Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
- Page 5 and 6: Promotores: Prof. dr. M.M.R.F. Stru
- Page 7 and 8: Paranimfen Marten Harbers Aribert B
- Page 9 and 10: Contents 3.3.4. Sensory changes at
- Page 11: 0 Contents Chapter 5 Do patients wi
- Page 14: Chapter 1 General introduction
- Page 17 and 18: 1. General introduction stimuli. C-
- Page 19 and 20: 1. General introduction Patients re
- Page 21 and 22: 1. General introduction 0 drugs (NS
- Page 23: 1. General introduction Table 1-2:
- Page 27 and 28: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 29 and 30: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 31 and 32: 0 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neu
- Page 33 and 34: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 35 and 36: 43 F 75 80 Herniated nucleus pulpos
- Page 37 and 38: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 39 and 40: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 41 and 42: 0 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neu
- Page 43 and 44: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 45 and 46: 2. Bilateral abnormalities in neuro
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 3 Somatosensory profiles bu
- Page 50 and 51: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 52 and 53: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 54 and 55: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 56 and 57: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 58 and 59: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 60 and 61: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 62 and 63: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 64 and 65: 3. Somatosensory function and neuro
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 4 A single QST parameter as
- Page 68 and 69: 4. QST and neuropathic pain mechani
- Page 70 and 71: 4. QST and neuropathic pain mechani
- Page 72 and 73: 4. QST and neuropathic pain mechani
1. General introduction<br />
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum occur in chronic pain (Apkarian<br />
et al 2011; DaSilva et al 2008; Geha et al 2008; Gustin et al 2011; Schweinhardt &<br />
Bushnell 2010; Tracey 2007; 2008; Tracey & Bushnell 2009; Tracey et al 2002). Precise<br />
phenotypic characterisation and imaging may be used to set objective criteria with<br />
which to measure disease and evaluate its treatment. <strong>QST</strong> phenotypic characterisation<br />
aiming to select patients for enrolment into clinical trials might decrease variance and<br />
increase the power to detect meaningful drug effects.<br />
Objectives of this thesis are to investigate:<br />
1. Implications of <strong>QST</strong> for clinical neuropathic pain practice:<br />
a. Are there differences in the diagnostic outcome of sensory signs in<br />
patients with neuropathic pain assessed by <strong>QST</strong> and bedside tests? (chapter 2)<br />
b. <strong>Does</strong> a greater level of certainty whether a pain condition is neuropathic<br />
reflect an increase in numbers of sensory abnormalities or/and specific<br />
patterns of sensory signs? (chapter 3)<br />
2. Implications of <strong>QST</strong> for clinical neuropathic pain research:<br />
a. Is <strong>QST</strong> valid to be used as a tool to identify somatosensory homogenous<br />
groups of patients with neuropathic pain? (chapter 4)<br />
3. Implications of <strong>QST</strong> in non-neuropathic pain diseases:<br />
a. Is <strong>QST</strong> sensitive to identify pain-contributing somatosensory changes in<br />
patients with patellar tendinopathies? (chapter 5)<br />
To address these objectives, a large <strong>QST</strong> database including healthy volunteers and<br />
patients with neuropathic pain was established. <strong>QST</strong> data from neuropathic pain patients<br />
were compared to those obtained from healthy controls with the aim to gain insight into<br />
the presence of abnormal somatosensory function in neuropathic pain patients.