Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. General introduction<br />
Table 1-2: Simplified overview of nerve fibres sub-modalities tested by <strong>QST</strong><br />
<strong>QST</strong><br />
parameter<br />
C-fibre<br />
Aδ-fibre<br />
Aβ-fibre<br />
CPT HPT WDT WUR CPT TSL PHS MPT MPS MDT DMA VDT PPT<br />
X X X X<br />
X<br />
X X X X X<br />
X<br />
X X X<br />
Potential overlapping modalities for each nerve fibre type are not shown. <strong>QST</strong> parameters are:<br />
Cold Pain Threshold (CPT), Heat Pain Threshold (HPT), Warm Detection Threshold (WDT), Wind<br />
Up Ratio (WUR), Cold Detection Threshold (CDT), Thermal <strong>Sensory</strong> Limen (TSL), Paradoxical<br />
Heat Sensation (PHS), Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT), Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS),<br />
Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT), Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA), Vibration<br />
Disappearance Threshold (VDT) and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT). All nerve fibre functionality<br />
tests are applied to the skin with exception of PPT (deep tissue C-fibre/Aδ-fibre test).<br />
1.2.1. <strong>QST</strong> and homogenous groups of somatosensory abnormalities<br />
<strong>QST</strong> might offer a tool to identify homogenous groups of somatosensory abnormalities<br />
in patients with neuropathic pain for the evaluation of novel pain compounds. The<br />
approach currently used in clinical trials is the assessment of general pain relief values<br />
for specific aetiologies, which might partially explain the failure to obtain complete<br />
pain relief in neuropathic pain conditions (Baron 2006). This is in line with the Food<br />
and Drug Administration (FDA) that requests the inclusion of patient populations for<br />
clinical trial based on disease endpoints for the registration of pain medication. More<br />
pragmatic in the current environment is to use a disease endpoint recognised by the<br />
FDA but to reduce heterogeneity in the patient group in order to reduce variability in<br />
the trial and increase the power. A classification based on sensory abnormalities rather<br />
than based merely on aetiology could contribute to minimising pathophysiological<br />
heterogeneity within study groups (Attal et al 2008). Such an approach would recognise<br />
not only pain as an outcome measure but also addresses troublesome features such<br />
as hyperalgesia and allodynia frequently reported by patients with neuropathic pain.<br />
There is a need for a different method of evaluating pain medications to increase<br />
positive treatment responses e.g. increase assay sensitivity. <strong>QST</strong>-based identification<br />
of homogenous patient populations could help to clarify the relationships between<br />
the aetiology and somatosensory abnormalities in neuropathic pain patients. This is a<br />
particularly interesting approach when such groups of somatosensory-wise homogenous<br />
pain patients are investigated further with e.g. neuroimaging techniques to reveal<br />
potential group-specific changes in the brain.<br />
Human brain imaging studies show that structural changes and brain function changes<br />
in different neural regions including the thalamus, nucleus accumbens, basal ganglia,