25.03.2013 Views

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. General introduction<br />

Table 1-2: Simplified overview of nerve fibres sub-modalities tested by <strong>QST</strong><br />

<strong>QST</strong><br />

parameter<br />

C-fibre<br />

Aδ-fibre<br />

Aβ-fibre<br />

CPT HPT WDT WUR CPT TSL PHS MPT MPS MDT DMA VDT PPT<br />

X X X X<br />

X<br />

X X X X X<br />

X<br />

X X X<br />

Potential overlapping modalities for each nerve fibre type are not shown. <strong>QST</strong> parameters are:<br />

Cold Pain Threshold (CPT), Heat Pain Threshold (HPT), Warm Detection Threshold (WDT), Wind<br />

Up Ratio (WUR), Cold Detection Threshold (CDT), Thermal <strong>Sensory</strong> Limen (TSL), Paradoxical<br />

Heat Sensation (PHS), Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT), Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS),<br />

Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT), Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA), Vibration<br />

Disappearance Threshold (VDT) and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT). All nerve fibre functionality<br />

tests are applied to the skin with exception of PPT (deep tissue C-fibre/Aδ-fibre test).<br />

1.2.1. <strong>QST</strong> and homogenous groups of somatosensory abnormalities<br />

<strong>QST</strong> might offer a tool to identify homogenous groups of somatosensory abnormalities<br />

in patients with neuropathic pain for the evaluation of novel pain compounds. The<br />

approach currently used in clinical trials is the assessment of general pain relief values<br />

for specific aetiologies, which might partially explain the failure to obtain complete<br />

pain relief in neuropathic pain conditions (Baron 2006). This is in line with the Food<br />

and Drug Administration (FDA) that requests the inclusion of patient populations for<br />

clinical trial based on disease endpoints for the registration of pain medication. More<br />

pragmatic in the current environment is to use a disease endpoint recognised by the<br />

FDA but to reduce heterogeneity in the patient group in order to reduce variability in<br />

the trial and increase the power. A classification based on sensory abnormalities rather<br />

than based merely on aetiology could contribute to minimising pathophysiological<br />

heterogeneity within study groups (Attal et al 2008). Such an approach would recognise<br />

not only pain as an outcome measure but also addresses troublesome features such<br />

as hyperalgesia and allodynia frequently reported by patients with neuropathic pain.<br />

There is a need for a different method of evaluating pain medications to increase<br />

positive treatment responses e.g. increase assay sensitivity. <strong>QST</strong>-based identification<br />

of homogenous patient populations could help to clarify the relationships between<br />

the aetiology and somatosensory abnormalities in neuropathic pain patients. This is a<br />

particularly interesting approach when such groups of somatosensory-wise homogenous<br />

pain patients are investigated further with e.g. neuroimaging techniques to reveal<br />

potential group-specific changes in the brain.<br />

Human brain imaging studies show that structural changes and brain function changes<br />

in different neural regions including the thalamus, nucleus accumbens, basal ganglia,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!