Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Does assessing ... - TI Pharma
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. General introduction<br />
stimuli. C-fibres are unmyelinated and the smallest and the slowest conducting type of<br />
primary afferents. They have the highest thresholds for activation and therefore detect<br />
selectively nociceptive or ‘painful’ stimuli. Collectively, both Aδ- and C-fibres can be<br />
termed as nociceptors or ‘pain fibres’, responding to noxious stimuli which may be<br />
mechanical, thermal, or chemical (D’Mello & Dickenson 2008). However, this might<br />
be a simplistic presumption since other authors now consider some Aβ-afferents also as<br />
nociceptors (Djouhri & Lawson 2004). These fibres are affected in clinical pains which<br />
may arise from different sources, for instance damage to tissue due to inflammation or<br />
damage to nerves in case of so-called neuropathic pain (Baron 2000; 2006; Basbaum<br />
et al 2009; Melzack et al 2001). Both may cause subsequent profound changes in the<br />
spinal cord and the brain.<br />
It is believed that all persistent forms of pain induce plasticity including altered<br />
mechanisms in peripheral and central signalling, suggesting that the mechanisms<br />
involved in pain are likely to be multiple and located at a number of sites (Dickenson<br />
1995; Dickenson et al 2002; Schaible 2007; Treede et al 1992). In 1970, David Hubel and<br />
Torsten Wiesel published intriguing results of plastic changes in the brain in their work<br />
with kittens (Hubel & Wiesel 1970). In their experiments, they shut one eye by sewing<br />
the eyelids together and electrophysiologically recorded cortical brain maps. They saw<br />
that the portion of the kitten’s brain associated with the shut eye was not inactive, as<br />
expected. Instead, it processed visual information from the open eye. This property<br />
of the nervous system to adapt morphologically and functionally to external stimuli is<br />
known as neuroplasticity.<br />
Altered mechanisms in the peripheral and central signalling in chronic pain can lead to<br />
hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli. Two types of hypersensitivity can be distinguished.<br />
First, allodynia is defined as pain in response to a non-nociceptive stimulus. In cases<br />
of mechanical allodynia, even gentle mechanical stimuli such as a slight touch can<br />
evoke severe pain. Second, hyperalgesia is defined as increased pain sensitivity to a<br />
nociceptive stimulus. Here, patients experience a painful stimulus such as a prick with<br />
greater intensity. Both, peripheral and central sensitisations are known to be involved in<br />
the generation of hypersensitivity. Peripheral sensitisation is a reduction in threshold and<br />
an increase in responsiveness of the peripheral ends of nociceptors. Whereas, central<br />
sensitisation is an increase in the excitability of neurons within the central nervous<br />
system, so that normal inputs produce abnormal responses. The increased excitability<br />
is typically triggered by a burst of activity in nociceptors, which alter the strength<br />
of synaptic connections between the nociceptor and the neurons of the spinal cord<br />
(so-called activity-dependent synaptic plasticity) (Hunt & Mantyh 2001; Woolf 2010;<br />
Woolf & Mannion 1999). As a result, an input that would normally evoke an innocuous<br />
sensation may now produce pain (Scholz & Woolf 2002; Woolf & Salter 2000). Altered<br />
peripheral and central signalling could be regarded as the structural correlate leading to