The Rainbow Swastika (PDF book) - Scattered Seed Ministries

The Rainbow Swastika - The Transformation of Society
Page 7 of 10
6a. Name-Calling and Negation: Accordingly, the NA talent for hijacking and redefining terms was employed. All three targeted religions
were labeled "fundamentalist" religions. The original meaning of the word, "back to the source teachings", became lost in the heavily
promoted new definition of "obsolete, inflexible and intolerant". [Just how "fundamentalism" came to be a religious stigma which provokes
a negative Pavlovian social response - and how it is invariably applied only to the faiths which do not fit in the Plan - would make a
fascinating study. Ever hear reports on "fundamentalist Wiccans" or "Buddhist fundamentalism"? Why not?] "Monotheistic" no longer
meant simply "one god", but "exclusivist, narrow," and above all "separatist". [Note here also the double standard in NA that excuses many
pagan religions which encourage and even demand separation from nonbelievers] Regarding Jewish religious practices in particular, nothing
is spared from attack, even it means outright fabrication. [This will have to be documented in a separate article, but circumcision and ritual
slaughter are only two examples which will ring a bell.] And all too often, other Jews willingly supply the ammunition.
A more sophisticated version of this technique was outlined by Robert Muller in 1981, while he was serving at the UN as the "idea man" for
the Secretary General (he served a total of three SGs, until his "active retirement" in 1984). In an interview with a New Age magazine,
Muller shared a strategy he called "Entity Promotion": "If I wanted to make a fortune, I would leave the UN and start a new profession
called 'entity promotion'. It would go far beyond public relations and advertising. I would say to my customers, 'You want to promote an
entity? A race, a religion, an institution,... anything, you name it. I will tell you how to do it.' Over the years, I have gathered two files on
entity promotion. The first deals with every possible technique to prove that your entity is superior. You need a flag, a hymn, an education, a
creed, a protocol, a language, famous persons, preferably even heroes and martyrs, etc." [This was ostensibly meant as a tongue-in-cheek
mockery of nationalism and religious fundamentalism. However, when one notes that the UN has established every single one of these
"entity promotion" props, while under the leadership of Muller, it is hard to chuckle.]
Muller goes on to describe a very interesting side of entity promotion: "My second file deals with ways to diminish other entities. Lie about
them, denigrate them, do not cease to repeat that they are bad, accuse them of anything and everything. The human species is still at the
stage where this is the predominant game on the planet.... We need entities." ("An Interview with Robert Muller: Toward a Global Politics
[sic]", _The Center Magazine_, Nov-Dec. 1981, emphasis mine.) [Here also, after viewing the disinformation campaign waged by globalminded
people against the Jewish religion and especially the Jewish State, Muller's "sarcasm" begins to sound more like a veiled directive
from the world-class successor of Alice Bailey. It is a directive that is clearly being followed to the letter. And, not only does humanity
"need entities", the Hierarchy needs an Entity War. And Bailey has identified the G-d of the Jews as the "evil entity" to be "diminished".]
6b. "Relocation" or "Purging": As the Luciferic initiation approaches, those who refuse to relinquish monotheism and/or Jewish identity
will be sent to "another dimension" or "level of vibration", somewhere outside of this physical incarnation, where they will be happier and
better off, according to Alice Bailey, Nicholas Roerich and David Spangler. The latter put it delicately, saying that "those attuned to the old
world" would be "transported through the [cosmic] law of attraction" to "another planet, plane of existence or level of earth's consciousness
where they can be contained.... The main point is that they will lose, for the time being, their access to the etheric planes of power and the
ability to control or influence the developments upon earth." (_Revelation, Birth of a New Age_, p.163-4) [An application of the call to "seal
the door where evil dwells" as it is worded in the Great Invocation. The "evil" is the one G-d, the "door" is those who believe in Him, and the
"sealing" is their physical removal.]
This relocation activity, known in the "old age" as mass murder or massacre, goes by other easy-to-digest euphemisms as well, and is
presented as part of the planetary "global purge" or "cleansing action". Benjamin Creme's term for it is "a necessary sword of cleavage".
(_The Reappearance of the Christ_, appendix, "How the Plan is Working Out") As he puts it, there is no choice: "It is indeed a matter of
share [not only economic resources and governmental power, but religious belief and identity] or [humanity will] die." Barbara Marx
Hubbard, with her characteristic directness, explains in her _The Book of Co-Creation_ that "the elders" view those who reject the "quantum
transformation" as a growing cancer which must be removed "before the whole body is destroyed." [For more details see the "Plan" section.]
All rebellion against this purge will simply be recognized as part of the "destructive one-fourth" of humanity which Hubbard says must be
removed to save the human race, giving the public impression that the Group Mind stands vindicated by opposition rather than challenged.
6c. Dividing and/or Conquering: At this present stage, those opposing the Plan are being neutralized in two less drastic ways. One is to win
them over by infiltration [see Missionizing section]. The other is to turn the various remaining orthodox monotheists one against another.
The single most notorious tool used by NA propagandists in history was "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion". Composed by
unknown sources whose identity is still debated among scholars, there is nevertheless ample evidence that NA agents were involved, if not in
its writing, certainly in its distribution. The individual who is acknowledged in a rare early edition of "Protocols" to have "found" the
document was none other than Yuliana Glinka, a devoted Theosophist and Helena Blavatsky's personal companion. According to the text,
Glinka "felt it her Christian [sic!] duty" to release it in Russia (where it was called "The Secret of the Jews"). The book was translated into
English by Victor Marsden, a British racial supremacist who fled England to join Hitler, and then circulated in the U.S. by occultist Henry
Ford. Ford was not only awarded the Nazi Supreme Order of the German Eagle in 1938, but he was also applauded for his "faith" by the
Theosophical Society. (_The Theosophist_, December 1938, p.239). Blavatsky herself wrote at least one antisemitic tract with content
remarkably similar to "Protocols", published by the Theosophical Society in 1888. (see _The Occult Establishment_ by James Webb) [And
Alice Bailey's repeated referral to the Jews as a "world problem" continues to heap fuel on the fire.]
The effect of "Protocols" on the history of Jewish-Christian and Jewish-Moslem relations hardly needs comment. To this day, most Jews are
convinced that "Protocols" is a disgusting piece of Christian slander, while far too many Christians and nearly all Moslems believe the book
to be an expose of Jewish ambition. From the NA point of view it was and continues to be a stroke of genius which keeps their main targets
at one another's throats, unaware of the need to unite against the NA Plan to eliminate monotheism. [The success is made more enjoyable, no
doubt, by the irony that they didn't have to invent a story: the Aquarian conspiracy to rule the world was simply put in the mouths of the
Jews, whose own mission to be "a light to the nations" was easily edited to include the element of forced conquest. The added bonus is that
whenever evidence of a world conspiracy turns up, their main target for liquidation can catch hell for it!]
The divide-and-conquer strategy also works well within the community, unfortunately. Orthodox-bashing is where the "change agents" have
ample help from the non-orthodox Jewish sector, who for reasons of their own, see no reason to defend their more observant brethren - and
even enjoy throwing a few punches themselves. The phenomenon is documented in an article aptly called "Season on the Orthodox", in
which author Avi Shafran reviews a number of serious charges made by secular Jews against religious Jews in the area of behavior and
ethics, all of which were investigated and proven baseless. (See the source, along with other examples in the "Views on Jews" section.)
Shafran's most important point in this context relates to a typically NA allegation that is most likely to upset the secular Jewish community:
the charge of orthodox separativeness. The rumor that orthodox Judaism classifies non-orthodox Jews as non-Jews - like the rumor that it
http://philologos.org/__eb-trs/naG.htm
2/26/2012