The Rainbow Swastika (PDF book) - Scattered Seed Ministries

The Rainbow Swastika - Education for the New Age
future." (quoted in several sources; see Kathy Collins who quotes it with approval, "Children are Not Chattel," _Free Inquiry_, pub. by the
Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism, Fall 1987. Collins' premise: "Children are not 'owned' by their parents." p.11) Decades
earlier, in 1946, psychiatrist Brock Chisholm (then head of the UN's World Health Organization) confessed, "We have swallowed all manner
of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents.... Whatever the cost, we must [reject] the mistaken old ways of our elders.... If it cannot be
done gently, it may have to be done roughly or even violently." (quoted favorably by Hillary Clinton, _It Takes a Village_, p.15) American
courts are backing this sentiment with legislation, as in the May 18, 1990 decision by the California Superior Court that a teacher's right to
free speech in the classroom supersedes the personal convictions of parents. As Texas Federal District Judge Melinda Harmon succinctly put
it: "Parents give up their rights when they drop the children off at public school." (quoted in _Schooling for a Global Age_, James Becker ed.,
p.xiii)
4f. The OBE War on the (Traditional) Family: Alice Bailey blamed the traditional family unit for promoting "separativeness, selfishness
and individual, isolated exclusiveness". (_Education_ IV, p.130) Her ideal of family life was that it serve theHierarchy, viewing both the
sexual relationship and childrearing with the sole motive of furthering human evolution (p.132). Following instructions to "deal with the
whole problem of parenthood" (p.133) through education, parental training programs are offered under OBE to bring the entire family into
NA education, under the label of "enlightened social engineering". This is not to produce family harmony so much as to eradicate conflicts
with home-taught values - conflicts in which "the educational institution frequently comes under scrutiny and must pull back." (Professor
John Goodlad, member of the Governing Board of UNESCO's Institute for Education. See "Guide to Getting Out Your Message," _National
Education Goals Panel Community Action Toolkit: A Do-It-Yourself Kit for Education Renewal_, p.6. Goodlad repeats this comment in
Foreword, _Schooling for a Global Age_, p.xiii.) Professor Goodlad, who also served with Bill Clinton in the 1980s on the UNESCO
Commission on Global Education, warned colleagues that "most youth still hold the same values as their parents", a situation which may
cause society to "decay". ("Report of Task Force C: Strategies for Change," _Schooling for the Future_, no.9, 1971) As for older family
members, Number Five of the Eight National Goals enshrined in "Goals 2000" not only specifies that OBE performance be used to determine
job placement after graduation, but suggests that the adult workforce be required to undergo OBE training to continue to be employable.
4g. OBE Foot in the Door at Home: By the mid-1990s, at least one state (Ohio) made the "parental educational or training program"
compulsory in certain cases, with refusal to attend constituting "parental education neglect" - not only a "misdemeanor" but theoretically
grounds for removing the children from the home. (See "Ohio Revised Code", 1996, Sec. 2919.222) Elsewhere, the PAT program (Parents
As Teachers) was gradually introduced until it became federal law under Goals 2000 (1994): In this framework, parents have the "right" to
teach their own children, provided that they fulfil the same "duties" expected of teachers. In such a framework, social service workers can be
authorized to inspect homes and rate parental performance (not only in the context of home-schooling, but in general childraising and values
education) - with the option of removing "poorly taught" children. Likewise, parents who refuse to accept social services in the PAT
framework can be classified as having homes with children "at risk". (see "Revised Risk Factors Form", Parents As Teachers National
Center, Inc.) The "Parental Rights and Responsibilities Act" of 1996, thought by many to provide balance to this issue, merely reinforced the
PAT concept, conditioning those "rights" on the "responsibilities" redefined by the New Education. The National Assessment of Educational
Process (NAEP) test given to students every four years (grades 4, 8, 12) includes both academic material and a survey about the child's home
life and family habits, another way of pinpointing "problem" families.
For the moment, privately run schools are still able to filter out a good bit of this indoctrination. The majority of these are under the auspices
of Christian or Jewish religious institutions. But even parents of these children may not rest easy, especially the Jews. NA "change agents"
have penetrated Jewish life in other ways, as we will see in the next section.
This concludes Segment H. [next segment, please...]
Links to the rest of the series: THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION FOR READERS PRO AND CON
A. HOW BIG A CONSPIRACY?
B. HUMAN HISTORY PER NEW AGE
C. THE GODS OF NEW AGE
D. 'THE PLAN' OF THE NEW AGE
E. VIEWS ON JEWS AND JUDAISM
F. NAZISM AND NEW AGE
G. THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIETY
H. EDUCATION IN THE NEW AGE
I. MISSIONIZING AMONG JEWS
J. WHAT TO DO: A JEWISH RESPONSE
http://philologos.org/__eb-trs/naH.htm
Philologos | Bible Prophecy Research | The BPR Reference Guide | Jewish Calendar | About Us
Page 6 of 7
2/26/2012