The Rainbow Swastika (PDF book) - Scattered Seed Ministries

The Rainbow Swastika - Human History According to the New Age
"good of society"? The sacred assumption of "woman's right to choose" was suspended years ago in China, where a nationwide forcedabortion
program is funded by the UN "Fund for Population Assistance" [sic]. What about the newer movement for assisted suicide,
respecting an individual's "right to die with dignity"? The World Health Organization reported that at least 50 million "missing" Chinese
women are possible euthanasia victims in a country that chooses to place higher value on its males. (WHO Regional Committee for the
Western Pacific, in a UN report released Sept. 26, 1997) How could this take place with the knowledge and approval - and assistance - of
that global champion of Human Rights, the United Nations?
Page 5 of 8
The answer is alarmingly simple. In the New Age Plan to which the UN is dedicated,"quality of life" is a collective value, not to be
interpreted by the selfish desires of an individual or group. Certain forward-looking global figures have been telling us for decades that the
individual's "quality of life" is secondary to that of the community: "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are basic rights. But they are
the rights of the individual and were listed [in the Declaration of Independence] at such a time when the literatures of freedom and dignity
were concerned with the aggrandizement of the individual. They have only a minor bearing on the survival of a culture." (B.F. Skinner,
prominent Harvard psychologist and writer). "The ill-conceived 'love of neighbor' has to disappear, especially in relation to inferior or
asocial creatures... in order to secure the maintenance of a hereditarily sound and racially pure people.... The life of an individual has
meaning only in the light of that ultimate aim." (Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director of Public Health) "We have seen more than once that the
public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength
of the State for these lesser sacrifices." (U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in Buck v. Bell) "Society as the trustee of life is
responsible to [collective] life for every botched [individual] life that comes into existence... [therefore society should] make it impossible for
them ever to see the light of day." (Friedreich Nietzsche) [in all of the above, emphasis is mine to show parallels]
3d. Balance with the Earth is a NA principle which reminds mankind that in the midst of all his advances, he must not forget that he is also
part of a Bigger Design in the cosmos. We might assume that this is meant to offset the eugenic mentality of omnipotence and impart a
humbler perspective of man's position - and so it is at the grassroots level. However, it is a two-tiered philosophy which further serves the
eugenics policy with regard to the upper ranks of NA leadership.
Part of man's enlightenment is to realize his responsibilities to care for the Earth. [Please note that New Agers are not speaking here about
ecology, although they use genuine ecology to attract caring, responsible people. We are now examining a religion in which man serves the
Earth, capital "E", as a goddess/mother.] While man is certainly obligated to take better care of the planet's resources, in the NA value
system the Earth does not exist to serve and sustain man; nor is man, for all his uniqueness in nature, to be regarded as superior to nature in
any way. Both concepts, derived from Judaism, are arrogant and wrong. "To give preference to the life of a being simply because it is a
member of our species would put us in the same position as racists." ("bioethicist" Peter Singer, _Animal Liberation_. Significantly,
Professor Singer is now Chairman of Princeton University's "Center for Human Values".) In the same spirit, U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Oliver Wendell Holmes (champion of compulsory sterilization laws as noted in theeugenics section) commented, "I see no reason for
attributing to man a significance different in kind from that which belongs to a baboon or a grain of sand."
But it is not enough that man is no longer to be considered the crowning achievement in creation, or even that "Mother Earth's needs" must
come before those of global humanity. By some peculiar reverse logic, man in his newly-found godhood begins his divine "at-one-ment"
with Nature by admitting that he is an alien, an intruder, a blight on Nature: "Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as
important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true.... We have
become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth.... Until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only
hope for the right virus to come along." (U.S. National Park Service biologist David Graber, reviewing Bill McKibben's _The End of Nature_
in _The Los Angeles Times_, Oct. 22, 1989) "The real enemy [which humanity must unite to fight] is humanity itself." (_The First Global
Revolution_, Club of Rome, p.115) "[Mankind is] the cancer of the planet." (U.S. Department of State Bulletin, Jan. 31, 1966, p.176)
Accordingly, the U.S. government is currently setting aside huge tracts of American land which will be off-limits to human beings, including
locations where forcible population transfer will be necessary. Clearly the much-publicized NA creed of "returning to Nature" can mean
something not anticipated by many who have jumped on the "Earth First" bandwagon.
To deal with this "cancer" which is humanity, not only is the quality of human life to be strictly controlled, but the quantity as well. Drastic
reduction of the human "plague" is a NA mandate of the highest order, and therefore (human) over-population is sold by the Western media
and government as the greatest menace facing the Earth today, beginning with the landmark book, _The Population Bomb_, by Paul Ehrlich:
"We must cut out the cancer of population growth. Coercion? Perhaps, but coercion in a good cause." (p.11) The Georgia Guidestones, a
tourist site dubbed "America's Stonehenge", is a monument to New Age priorities, and over-population gets attention from first to last -
literally. Engraved on huge granite slabs in 12 different languages (including Hebrew) are a NA equivalent to the Ten Commandments, said
to be dictated by anonymous "guides". Guideline Number One specifies that earth's population must be reduced to 1/2 billion in order to
"balance with Nature", implying that at least 80% of humanity must be eliminated. Guideline Number Ten reads: "Be not a cancer on the
earth - leave room for nature, leave room for nature." While the Guidestones were erected by an anonymous group which cannot claim to
represent NA leadership worldwide, prominent figures concur that catastrophic population reductions are necessary for humanity's
advancement: "The total world population should be not more than 2 billion, rather than the current 5.6 billion [in 1994]." (Cornell
University professor David Pimentel, speaking at the American Association for the Advancement of Science) The UN was even more
specific: "A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1
billion. At the more frugal European standard, 2 to 3 billion would be possible." ("UNEP Global Assessment Report", Phase One Draft,
sec.9) [According to the UN Population Census table, its 1 billion limit would take us back to the global population of the year 1804, and 2
billion to 1927.] At the "State of the World Forum", sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation and attended by many world leaders (San
Francisco, 1995), Dr. Sam Keen, a respected NA philosopher, proposed the more stringent Georgia Guidestones level of 1/2 billion: "Cut the
population [of roughly 5.8 billion that year] by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage." (William
Jasper, "Global Gorby", _The New American_, Oct. 30, 1995) Al Gore, U.S. Vice President at the time, went so far as to blame overpopulation
in Third World countries for global warming. (_Washington Times_, "Third World Birth Control Tops Gore's List of 'Global
Warming' Cures", Oct. 1997) [How an abundance of dark-skinned babies can affect global temperatures more than an abundance of
American cars, power plants, shopping malls and air conditioners is a mystery I'm still pondering. The fact that the man wasn't laughed out of
office provides yet more food for thought.]
[Note: Reputable scientists have been offering proof that the earth is not overpopulated at all, but that the available land, food and
populations are not being managed efficiently. Consider Colin Clark, former Director of the Oxford University Agricultural Economic
Institute, who determined that with today's technology enough food can be produced to feed 35.1 billion people with "an American-type diet"
using only 50% of the earth's land mass. Or Roger Revelle, former Director of the Harvard Center of Population Studies, who came up with a
http://philologos.org/__eb-trs/naB.htm
2/26/2012