25.03.2013 Views

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Subjects exposed to HBOT are about 40 times more likely to experience healing of their<br />

lesions compared to those receiving comparison therapies (Figure 8).<br />

The sample sizes in the studies which included wound healing as an outcome are too<br />

small to safely infer effectiveness. Therefore, an incremental cost per wound healed can<br />

not reasonably be estimated.<br />

Non-diabetic wounds<br />

Hammarlund and Sundberg 51 exposed two groups of 8 subjects with leg ulcers of more<br />

than one-year’s duration, to different concentrations of oxygen (intervention group 100<br />

percent oxygen while the comparison group received air) in a multiplace chamber. The<br />

frequency of exposure was five times a week for a total of 30 sessions.<br />

The study looked at the mean changes in wound area over the course of therapy (Table<br />

20). At 4 and 6 weeks, there were statistically significant decreases in the wound areas of<br />

the HBOT group compared to the comparison group. The intervention group had a<br />

35.7% decrease in wound area from baseline, compared to 2.7% decrease in wound area<br />

for the comparison group, at 6 weeks.<br />

This suggests that HBOT treatment of chronic leg ulcers might result in an expected one<br />

third reduction in wound area for a treatment cost of $6,941 per patient. The clinical<br />

significance of this outcome or its significance to patient welfare in the longer term is not<br />

sufficiently clear to assess whether this is an acceptable figure.<br />

Necrotising soft tissue infections<br />

The effectiveness assessment (Table 21) reports on two studies from the published<br />

literature that looked at necrotising soft tissue infections in general. Both studies showed<br />

that HBOT was associated with survival, but only Riseman et al 53 reached statistical<br />

significance. 76.5% of patients in the intervention group survived compared to 33.3% in<br />

the comparison group, a difference of 43.1% (95% CI: 9.7%, 76.6%, p=0.0202).<br />

An incremental HBOT treatment cost per death avoided can be estimated, based on the<br />

results from Riseman et al 53 The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis is shown in Table<br />

80. The incremental HBOT treatment cost per death avoided is estimated to be $16,105,<br />

in patients with necrotising soft tissue infections. The analysis above is based on an<br />

average of 30 HBOT sessions per patient (for all indications) (Table 24). Riseman et al 53<br />

reported a total of 10 treatments per patient. Using an estimate of 10 sessions per patient<br />

results in a total monoplace chamber cost (operating and capital costs based on full<br />

capacity) per treatment of $231.37 and a total cost per patient of $2,314, which then<br />

lowers the incremental cost per death avoided. However the duration of survival in each<br />

group is unknown. An estimated cost per survivor is less meaningful than a cost per<br />

survival time. While a cost per death avoided of $16,105 might appear to be a very<br />

acceptable cost, it may be that the survival curves of the treated patients and the<br />

comparator group converge quickly and the life years gained may be very small. In<br />

addition a significant positive result was only reported in one study.<br />

86 <strong>Hyperbaric</strong> oxygen therapy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!