25.03.2013 Views

Armor Magazine Counterinsurgency Selected Works - US Army

Armor Magazine Counterinsurgency Selected Works - US Army

Armor Magazine Counterinsurgency Selected Works - US Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“The ordinary civilian caught in the middle between government and insurgent forces should<br />

be the main objective of insurgent or counterinsurgent operations. Civilians are the center of<br />

gravity and the aspect of this particular struggle that can tip the favor from one side to another,<br />

thus enabling insurgents to recruit local citizens to join the insurgency, and encouraging the<br />

local populace to support the insurgency by providing a base of operations or hospitality to the<br />

insurgent, as well as financial and other means of support.”<br />

sional to understand the intricate details that drive a countryman<br />

to turn away from his government for ideological purposes.<br />

Social reasons could involve anything from religion to race,<br />

which create deep divisions among all parties involved in the<br />

conflict and become sectarian in nature. If it were an internal<br />

conflict involving a government force against a sectarian group,<br />

then we would possibly find insurgents and government forces<br />

crossing lines to support the sectarian group with whom they<br />

have a religious or ethnic alliance. This was very common during<br />

the Balkan wars in the 1990s, after the former communist<br />

state of Yugoslavia divided into six independent states.<br />

Political friction also tends to spark an insurgency. These political<br />

causes range anywhere from a particular group wanting<br />

to live under the rule of a monarch, or in the case of Fidel Castro<br />

and Cuba in 1959, a socialist movement that ended up ejecting<br />

the corrupt Batista government from power. In the case of<br />

Castro, this is very similar to the earlier discussion of the Islamic<br />

political organization of Hezbollah. The Castro movement<br />

sought to discredit the Batista government through propaganda<br />

or information operations, which was used to target the center<br />

of gravity or local populace. The main objective of this campaign<br />

was to inform the center of gravity that the Batista government<br />

was not providing basic needs to the local populace. Sustenance,<br />

medical needs, education, and basic social services would be<br />

given in return for support of the revolutionaries. This propaganda<br />

led to materiel, manpower, and sanctuary support to the revolutionaries.<br />

9<br />

Economic reasons tend to coincide with political reasons. Poor<br />

economic conditions can cause people to give up on their government,<br />

or as a member of the bourgeoisie, can significantly<br />

impair a state’s economy. In an industrial society, the bourgeoisie<br />

(middle class) would cripple a state’s economy through refusing<br />

to work or consume the goods that an industrial nation produces.<br />

The Russian Revolution is an example of a bourgeoisie<br />

insurgency — the government and economy fell to the wrath of<br />

communism because the bourgeoisie was not represented and<br />

not treated fairly in the industrial complex. 10 The economy causes<br />

a nation to appear viable or broken. If other nations cease to have<br />

faith in the market of a certain country, this<br />

might spur a revolution. The disgruntled worker<br />

has every opportunity to become an ideologue,<br />

social or political insurgent.<br />

Dr. Echevarria believes that the military professional<br />

should understand the more intricate<br />

political and social situation in a country.<br />

This allows the military professional to<br />

understand a potential enemy and grasp all<br />

aspects of warfare, not just high-intensity<br />

conflict. The problem is this type of warfare<br />

does not appeal to the military professional<br />

because it is not just instructional; it requires<br />

an intellectual mind to figure out what<br />

is causing the internal strife — the tougher<br />

issue is developing an exit strategy from such<br />

a conflict.<br />

During high-intensity conflicts, the combatants<br />

can always sign peace accords and return<br />

to their countries. They can also cede<br />

control of the terrain they have occupied, if<br />

it no longer appeals to their strategic interests.<br />

The insurgency does not allow for such<br />

a retreat or peace accord; the fight is personal<br />

because it usually involves countryman against countryman.<br />

These feuds normally reignite century after century, and potentially<br />

can only be prevented through the use of peacekeepers.<br />

Serious intellectual thought, coupled with instructional methods,<br />

are the only way to fight these small-scale wars. Most western<br />

countries and militaries have taken part in trying to extinguish<br />

the flames of insurgent conflict, but why have they failed<br />

more times than not?<br />

The United States, Russia, Great Britain, and France have, at<br />

one time or another, been faced with an insurgency. The problem<br />

is that armies do not plan for this phase of combat operations,<br />

and tend not to be focused on a civilian enemy that rejects<br />

their occupation of a country they have no right to occupy. The<br />

key term is “occupy” because it highlights the fact that occupying<br />

forces are not welcome and are forced to occupy a country<br />

through the means of invasion, whether sanctioned, or not, by<br />

the world community.<br />

The western world has typically had difficulty containing or<br />

eliminating insurgencies. Jeffrey Record in Beating Goliath,<br />

Why Insurgencies Win, presents 12 characteristics the United<br />

States and other western countries exhibit. These characteristics,<br />

which equate to 12 “tragic flaws,” continuously cause western<br />

countries to struggle when dealing with insurgencies. These<br />

countries tend to be: apolitical; astrategic; ahistorical; problemsolving,<br />

optimistic; culturally ignorant; technologically dependent;<br />

firepower focused; large scale; profoundly regular; impatient;<br />

logistically excellent; and sensitive to casualties. 11<br />

To facilitate a successful counterinsurgency, one must understand<br />

the usefulness of Record’s 12 characteristics, for starters:<br />

apoliticalness describes how a country ventures into war without<br />

considering the political outcome of the country occupied;<br />

and astrategic is the bridge between the war and post-war rebuilding<br />

operations, which requires developing a plan of how<br />

to get from combat operations to stability operations. Record<br />

agrees with Dr. Echevarria’s assertion that military professionals<br />

need to study all aspects of military history (ahistorical) during<br />

peacetime. He also believes that western countries do a poor<br />

42 — September-October 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!