- Page 1 and 2:
The exercise of judicial discretion
- Page 3 and 4:
The Research Unit, Department for C
- Page 6 and 7:
Contents Executive summary i Chapte
- Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary The research ques
- Page 10 and 11:
the shift to housing officers appea
- Page 12:
Conclusions A wide and diverse rang
- Page 15 and 16:
on the role of judges under the exi
- Page 17 and 18:
Northern 1 court hears over 1500 ho
- Page 19 and 20:
significance to a particular respon
- Page 21 and 22:
The application may be adjourned; t
- Page 23 and 24:
such forms are completed in less th
- Page 25 and 26:
In November 2001, the Legal Service
- Page 27 and 28:
Levels of arrears Although the reas
- Page 29 and 30:
Table 2: Rent levels from ODPM stat
- Page 31 and 32:
Table 5: Changes in outcomes of ini
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 6: Impact of participation on
- Page 35 and 36:
The focus group participants consid
- Page 37 and 38:
consideration in this chapter, the
- Page 39 and 40:
Neither of the judges seemed to con
- Page 41 and 42:
chambers, where the possession list
- Page 43 and 44:
Most of the district judges felt th
- Page 45 and 46:
The views of the claimants’ group
- Page 47 and 48:
Qualitative and quantitative data f
- Page 49 and 50:
anything to say, and wants to stay
- Page 51 and 52:
Table 7: Sources of training and up
- Page 53 and 54:
sought with what they know the judg
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 5: Judges and landlords Int
- Page 57 and 58:
Chart 7: Orders granted by requests
- Page 59 and 60:
some unevenness in the impact of re
- Page 61 and 62:
Thus it can be seen that the type o
- Page 63 and 64:
District judges differed on how muc
- Page 65 and 66:
There were three other, more genera
- Page 67 and 68:
Conclusions In this chapter, we hav
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 6: Judges and tenants Intro
- Page 71 and 72: approach he was more confident in t
- Page 73 and 74: “I think in terms of exercising d
- Page 75 and 76: Family make up The broad powers of
- Page 77 and 78: are trying to deal with the particu
- Page 79 and 80: “I wouldn’t dream of making an
- Page 81 and 82: interpreter. Similarly, many of the
- Page 83 and 84: Judges are human too - personal rea
- Page 85 and 86: understand the proceedings, a great
- Page 87 and 88: What must be emphasised is that whi
- Page 89 and 90: also the most common explanation gi
- Page 91 and 92: anomalous case of West Country cour
- Page 93 and 94: District judges’ knowledge. Some
- Page 95 and 96: Two of the judges interviewed felt
- Page 97 and 98: DJ: I’d be inclining towards the
- Page 99 and 100: how he dealt with the housing benef
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8: Particular decisions: gr
- Page 103 and 104: Table 10: Outcomes in Ground 8 case
- Page 105 and 106: Others were, however, prepared to g
- Page 107 and 108: It is perhaps not surprising that,
- Page 109 and 110: the basis of the original possessio
- Page 111 and 112: Chart 13: Impact of family make up
- Page 113 and 114: The advice to the tenant was often
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 9: Conclusions Where the la
- Page 117 and 118: shows that the vast majority of tho
- Page 119 and 120: important determining factors is th
- Page 121: Thus it is likely that that even th
- Page 125 and 126: Lawrence J (1995) “Sentencing pro
- Page 127 and 128: give a typology of the characterist
- Page 129 and 130: In analysing cases percentages have
- Page 131 and 132: Appendix 2 - Research instruments 1
- Page 133 and 134: What factors would you ascribe thos
- Page 135 and 136: 20. Typically, how would you descri
- Page 137 and 138: with a duty desk representative who
- Page 139: DCA Research Series No. 6/05 The ex