lltotor
lltotor
lltotor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Fleport on Activities Under the<br />
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle<br />
Safety Act of 1966 and the<br />
Motor Vehicle Information and Cost<br />
Savings Act of 1972<br />
January 1 ,1977<br />
- December 31 , 1977<br />
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF<br />
TRANSPORTATION<br />
National Highway Traffic<br />
Safety Administration<br />
<strong>lltotor</strong><br />
Vehicle<br />
Safietv<br />
1gT7 -<br />
)<br />
.-I
PREFACE<br />
This is the I lth annual report on the administration of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety<br />
Act of 1966, and is in fulfillment of the reporting requirements in Section 102 of the Act. The annual<br />
report on bumpers, required by Section I12, Title I, of the Motor Vehicle lnformation and Cost Savings<br />
Act of 1972 also is included in this volume. In addition, the statutory obligations contained in<br />
the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1976 with respect to odometer rampering,<br />
and how they are being met, are touched upon in this report.<br />
Part A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 added to the Motor Vehicle Information<br />
and Cost Savings Act a new Title V, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to set, adjust, and<br />
enforce average motor vehicle fuel economy standards. Two annual reports of activities under this<br />
Act have been submitted to the Congress. This text contains a brief outline of the high points of the<br />
most recent of these reports.<br />
In the 7 years following establishment of a national traffic safety program in 1966, the fatality rate<br />
(the number of deaths per 100 million miles driven) declined steadily from 5.48 to 4.11. Then came<br />
the fuel crisis and the permanent imposition of the national 55-mph maximum speed limit in January<br />
1974. The safety eff'ects were dramatic. In 1974, traffic deaths fell by nearly 9,000, from 54,052 to<br />
45,195; and the fatality rate declined from 4.1 I to 3.52. The fbllowing two years brought little change<br />
in the number of deaths on the highway, but there were some further reductions in the fatality rate,<br />
despite a fairly substantial growth in the number of miles driven. The 55-mph speed limit proved its<br />
value as a fuel economy measure and as a lifesaving measure.<br />
Average speeds soon began inching up, however, and some States reduced or eliminated penalties for<br />
infractions of the law. This, coupled with the growth in traffic volume, raised the number of traffic<br />
fatalities 4.7 percent, to 47,671 in 1977. These are not only statistics, but lives; 3,150 more dead<br />
individuals in 1971 than in 1975,<br />
Increased driving speeds are a major contributor to these fatalities, but the growing automobile<br />
population, the greater number of miles driven, the growing disparity in weight among the vehicles<br />
making up the total inventory, and other factors all play a part. There are more bicycies, mororcycles,<br />
and mopeds on the road. The rising tolls add up to an enormous clrain on the national economy;<br />
the annual direct economic cost is currently estimated to be lnore than $43 billion.<br />
It is possible to estimate what might have happened without the positive effects of the motor vehicle<br />
and highway safety standards and the institution of the 55-mph speed limit. If rhe farality rate had<br />
remained constant since I976, the direct economic cost would probably now exceed $76 biltion each<br />
year, and traffic deaths would approximate 77,000 annually. Many research projects have advanced<br />
the state-of-the-art of traffic safety. Safety devices have been incorporated in vehicles and remedial<br />
measures have been applied to the traffic system. In the period since 1967, the total number of lives<br />
saved by the declining latality rate amounts to some 150,000. Motor vehicle safety standards and improved<br />
highway design have contributed greatly to this reduction. About half of the fatality reduction<br />
since 1974 is attributed to lower speeds, resulting from imposition of the 55-mph speed limit.<br />
This is a saving of 20,000 lives in a 4-year period.<br />
1<br />
-:c]<br />
'::i
In spite of those factors that have curbed the highway death toll, traffic fatalities have stubbornly<br />
remained the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. It is a national calamity that the penalties<br />
fall disproportionately on the very young and on those in their most productive years' Traffic<br />
accidents are the number one killer among the 5 to 9-year-olds, and number two among those 9 to 14<br />
years of age. In the 15 to 34-year-old age bracket, highway deaths are the primary killer, accounting<br />
for 38 percent of all deaths among those 15 to 19 years of age, and diminishing to l9 percent of the 30<br />
to 34-year-old category. Other causes, such as heart disease and cancer, push traffic fatalities back to<br />
4th, 6th, and 7th place among those in their late 30's, {6's, and 50's, and to tiny percentages among<br />
the elderly.<br />
The untold human suffering which the traffic death figures represenr, plus the financial burden to<br />
society, make the national traffic safety program worthy of high priority with Federal, State, and<br />
community governments, all branches of the automotive industry, private and public organizations,<br />
and most important of all, with the public.<br />
Specific reporting requirements in the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act are covered in<br />
the Chapters and Appendices listed below:<br />
l. A statistical compilation of the accidents and injuries occurring in the Appendix A<br />
preceding calendar year.<br />
2. A list of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards prescribed or in effect<br />
during the year.<br />
Chapter 2<br />
3. The degree of observance of applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety<br />
Standards.<br />
Chapters 6 and 8<br />
Appendix F<br />
4. A summary of all current research grants and contracts, together with a Chapter I I<br />
description of the problems to be considered by the grantees and contIactors.<br />
Appendix E<br />
5. An analysis and evaluation, including relevant policy recommendations, Chapters l, 4, 5,<br />
of research activities completed and technological progress achieved<br />
during the year.<br />
7 and ll<br />
6. A statement of enforcement actions during the year, including judicial<br />
decisions, settlements, and pending litigation.<br />
Chapters 6 and 8<br />
Appendix F<br />
7. The extent to which technical information was disseminated to the scientific<br />
community and consumer-oriented information was made available<br />
to the motoring public.<br />
Chapters l, 8,<br />
and I I<br />
APpendix D<br />
The statutory reporting requirements with respect to bumpers and odometer tampering are contained<br />
in Chapter 9.<br />
IY<br />
'
CONTENTS<br />
Chapter I Inlroduction<br />
The Record<br />
Motor Vehicle Safety Rulernaking Plan<br />
Priority Programs<br />
Recent Additions to NHTSA Responsibilities . .<br />
Chapter 2<br />
Chapter 3<br />
The Standards Summnry 1977.<br />
Data Acquisition, Analysis, and Reporting<br />
Differential Velocity Crash Recorder<br />
Chapter 4 Crnsh Survivability<br />
Occupant Protection<br />
Vehicle Structures<br />
Pedestrian Protection<br />
Biornechanics<br />
Integrated Vehicle Systems Program<br />
Chrpter 5 Crash Avoldnnce.<br />
Vehicle Handling<br />
Tires and Wheels<br />
Brakes<br />
The Driver and the Vehicle<br />
Chapter 6 Standards Enforcement snd Defects Investigatiorr<br />
Standards Enforcenrent Background. . . . .<br />
The Record<br />
Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />
Surveillance of Imported Nonconforming Motor Vehicles<br />
Defects Investigation Background<br />
How the Job is Done<br />
NHTSA and rhe Recall Campaigns<br />
Safety Defect Recalls-I977 .....<br />
Safety Campaign Audits<br />
Parts Return Program<br />
Recreational Vehicle Surveys<br />
Engi neering Test Facility<br />
Chapter 7 Automotive Fuel Economy<br />
Summary of Functions and Interagency Relations . . . .<br />
Standards Issued and Proposed . . . .<br />
I<br />
I<br />
4<br />
4<br />
6<br />
l3<br />
r4<br />
l5<br />
l5<br />
l6<br />
t'7<br />
r8<br />
l8<br />
25<br />
)\<br />
26<br />
2'7<br />
28<br />
3l<br />
3l<br />
3l<br />
32<br />
33<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
36<br />
37<br />
3'1<br />
38<br />
39<br />
39<br />
39<br />
.H<br />
r,
Regulations and Compliance . .<br />
Fuel Economy Research<br />
Chapter E Litigation and Administrative Enforcement . ' '<br />
Litigation Highlights, I 977<br />
AdministrativeEnforcement . ' '<br />
Chapter I $pecial Programs<br />
International CooPeration . . . .<br />
No-Damage Bumper System<br />
Electric and Hybrid Vehicles Summary<br />
Odometcr Tampering<br />
Chapter l0 The Consumer's Advocate. . . . .<br />
Informing the Press and the Public<br />
ServingtheConsumer . . . .<br />
Chapter 11 Research and How It Is Used.<br />
Analysis, Evaluation, and Dissemination of Research<br />
Current Research Grants and Contracts and the Problems They Address ' ' ' ' . .<br />
Chapter 12 National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory Council '<br />
Reports<br />
Recommendations .<br />
Chapter 13 Administration ...<br />
Organizational Changes<br />
Management Improvements . . .<br />
CivilRights ..;...<br />
GLOSSARY<br />
APPENDICES<br />
A.<br />
B.<br />
E.<br />
F.<br />
vi<br />
Statistical Compilation<br />
The National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory Council<br />
I977 Membership .<br />
Funding Tables<br />
Publications of the National Highway Traffic Safety<br />
Administration . ..<br />
Current Research Grants and Contracts and the Problems<br />
TheyAddress ....<br />
Litigation: Calendar 1977 ..<br />
4A<br />
40<br />
43<br />
43<br />
41<br />
45<br />
45<br />
47<br />
47<br />
47<br />
49<br />
49<br />
49<br />
5l<br />
5l<br />
51<br />
57<br />
57<br />
58<br />
59<br />
59<br />
60<br />
60<br />
A-l<br />
B-l<br />
c-l<br />
D-l<br />
E-1<br />
F-t
TABLES<br />
l. Traffic Fatalities, 196l-1977 viii<br />
2. Analysis of 1976 Traffic Accident Fatalities 3<br />
3. Lives Saved Due to Fatality Rate Reduction . . .<br />
4. National Highway Traf'tic Safety Administration Historical<br />
3<br />
andlegislativeBackground... 6<br />
5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standardsand Regulations ... l0<br />
6. Comparison of Integrated Vehicle System Goals . 19<br />
l. AlternativesAffectingFuelEconomy..... 23<br />
8. Summary of Investigations 1969-19'7'1 . . . . 32<br />
9. Number of Civil Penaltics and Dollar Amounts (1968-1976) 32<br />
10. Summary of Safety Recall Campaigns . 37<br />
I l 1977 Fuel Economy Slandards and Regulations . . 4l<br />
12. 1977 Research Accomplishments and Application<br />
to Motor Vehicle Standards 52<br />
13. Data Acquisition and Statistical Analysis 56<br />
FIGURES<br />
1.55'sthelimit. ,........,i I ,<br />
Z. Air Bag Demonstration . . . 5<br />
3. National Accident Sampling System 14 ::<br />
4. Automatic Safety Belt System 16 i<br />
5. Child and Infant Restraint Systems 16 l<br />
6. Experinental Child Restraint Seat . .<br />
7. Side Impact Testing to Determine a Variety of Deformations . .<br />
l7<br />
l7<br />
I<br />
i<br />
L Adult Male Dummy<br />
9. Experirnental Headlamp Covers to Increase Fuel Economy . . . . .<br />
10. New Minicar RSV Design . . . .<br />
l8<br />
20<br />
20<br />
,<br />
i<br />
j<br />
I l. RSV Phase II Configuration . . 21<br />
12. Section View of VW RSV with Turbocharged Diesel Engine . . . . ZZ<br />
13. VW Turbocharged Diesel Engine Experimental Vehicle 22<br />
14. Portable Wind Generator . .<br />
15. Car-Trailer Combination lllustrating Favorablc Load Equalization<br />
25<br />
26<br />
:<br />
16. Motorcycle Equippcd with Experimental Safety Devices 26<br />
l'7. Ultrasonic Tire Testing System 27<br />
18. Tire Casing Bead Tester 27<br />
19. Testing Saf ety Problems Due to Intermixed Braking Systems 28<br />
20. Testirrg Program to Determine Crash Survivability 32<br />
21. Mopeds*A New Traffic Safety Problem 33<br />
22. NHTSA Deputy Administrator Works His Shift on the Hotline 34<br />
23. Failed Flexible Fan . , . 36<br />
24. Parts Return Program 31<br />
25. Engineering Test Facility 38<br />
26. British Leyland Marina RSV. . 46<br />
27 . Safe Driving in Winter 50<br />
28. Tips on Car Care and Safety for Deaf Drivers-Spanish Version . . . . 50<br />
29. National Highway Traff'ic Safety Administration Organizational Chart 59<br />
$
Table 1"<br />
Traflic Fatalities, 1961-1977<br />
The fatalities and rates for 1976 and 1977 in this Table represent the latest sfaflsflcs available.<br />
1961<br />
Average annual change<br />
Total change<br />
1S66<br />
1966<br />
Average annual change<br />
Total change<br />
1973<br />
1974<br />
Change from 1973<br />
1975<br />
Change from 1974<br />
1976<br />
Change from 1975<br />
1977 (as of 5/1/78)<br />
Change from 1976<br />
Fatalities*<br />
36,285<br />
+7.0%<br />
+ a0.3%<br />
50,894<br />
50,8S4<br />
+ .9o/o<br />
+6.2oh<br />
54,052<br />
45,196<br />
-16.4%<br />
44,525<br />
* 1.5%<br />
45,523<br />
+2.2o/o<br />
47,671<br />
+ 4.7Vo<br />
Fatality<br />
Rate-<br />
*<br />
4.92<br />
+2.2o/o<br />
+ 11.4Vo<br />
5.48<br />
5.48<br />
*4.O%<br />
-25.0%<br />
4.11<br />
3.52<br />
* 14.4ot'o<br />
3.35<br />
- 4.8o/o<br />
3.23<br />
-3.6%<br />
3.25<br />
+0.6%<br />
Drivers<br />
(mil)<br />
88.7<br />
+2.6V0<br />
+ 13.9%<br />
101.0<br />
101.0<br />
+ 2.7o/o<br />
+203%<br />
121.5<br />
125.4<br />
+32%<br />
129.8<br />
+3.5%<br />
134.0<br />
*3.2o/o<br />
137.9<br />
+2.90/o<br />
Vehicles<br />
(mil)<br />
76.6<br />
+ 4.6Yo<br />
+24.9%<br />
95.7<br />
95.7<br />
+ 4.5o/o<br />
+ 35.8%<br />
130.0<br />
134.9<br />
+ 3.8%<br />
137.S<br />
+2.2oh<br />
143"5<br />
+ 4.1o/o<br />
148.9<br />
+ 3.8D/o<br />
Vehicle<br />
Miles (bil)<br />
737.5<br />
+ 4.7Yo<br />
+25.8Yo<br />
927.9<br />
927.9<br />
+5.1%<br />
+ 41.9'h<br />
1,316.7<br />
1,283.3<br />
-2.5Vo<br />
1,330.8<br />
+3.7o/o<br />
1,409.2<br />
+ 5.9%<br />
1,466.0<br />
+ 4.OVo<br />
SOUFCE-Fatalitlesl 1961-1974, National Center for Health Statistics, HEW, and State accident summaries (adjusted to 30day deaths).<br />
1975-1977, Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS), NHTSA .<br />
Drivers, Vehicles, Vehicle Miles-Federal Highway Administration<br />
*Traltic<br />
fatalities are deaths resulting from motor vehlcte accidents occurring on lrafficways. Statisflcs represent dealhs occurrlng withtn<br />
30 days after the date of the accident.<br />
"Traffic<br />
fatallties per 100 million vehicle miles.<br />
NOTE: Deaths occurring withln 30 days of an accident reprssent approximately 980/o of all trafflc death8,<br />
Vehicles in thls table repre$ent all those regist€red at various points in time durlng the calendar y€er and do not represent those in<br />
usa at any one time.
I cnnprEn I<br />
!<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Record<br />
Traffic accidents are the sixth leading cause of<br />
death in the United States. ln 1977, they claimed<br />
47 ,67 | lives. This national tragedy is compounded<br />
by the fact that most of those killed were the young<br />
and those in their most productive years. Traffic<br />
acciclents are the number one cause of death for<br />
children between the ages of 5 and 9, accounting<br />
for 26 percent of all deaths occurring in that age<br />
bracket. They are the number two cause of death<br />
for children in the 10 to 14 bracket, accounting for<br />
23 percent of all deaths. Between l5 and 34, they<br />
are once again number one, claiming an alarming<br />
38 percent of all those who die in the l5 to l9 age<br />
group and gradually decreasing to 14 percent in<br />
the 30 to 34 year old group. Other causes of death,<br />
such as heart disease and cancer, push traffic<br />
fatalitics to 4th, 6th, and 7th place as a cause of<br />
death for those in their late 30's, {1's, and 50's,<br />
and to tiny percentages among the elderly.<br />
In addition to the thousands who are killed each<br />
year on the highways, hundreds of thousands<br />
more are injured, many seriously, and many permanently"<br />
For example, car crashes are the number<br />
one cause of epilepsy and paraplegia in the<br />
United States.<br />
The direct economic cost to society, currently<br />
estimated at $43 billion annually, is enormous.<br />
This level of financial loss is I l/z times greatet than<br />
the yearly expenditure for building, maintaining,<br />
and operating the entire 3.9 million-mile network<br />
of roads in the United States.<br />
While human suffering cannot be measured, this<br />
factor, coupled with the monetary loss, was the<br />
basis and the impetus of the national traffic safety<br />
program launched by Congress with enactment of<br />
traffic sal'ety legislation in 1966. Since that time,<br />
some historic trends have been altered. as both<br />
motor vehicles and highways have been made safer<br />
through the application of safety technology to the<br />
range of problems that cause accidents and intensify<br />
their severity and effects.<br />
Traditionally, an increase in the number of registered<br />
vehicles has resulted in a corresponding<br />
growth in vehicle miles of travel, and in the number<br />
of traffic deaths. This relationship led to the<br />
adoption of vehicle miles of travel as a basis for<br />
assessing accident trends. From 1945 to 1961,<br />
there was a steady 6 percent annual growth in the<br />
level of vehicle travel, but a smaller increase in the<br />
number of fatalities. The result was a decrease in<br />
the fatality rate (the number of deaths per 100 mil-<br />
Iion miles of travel) for the entire period. Conversely,<br />
during the s-year period 196l through<br />
1966, the number of fatalities increased by 40 percent,<br />
while vehicle miles of travel increased only<br />
26 percent. This resulted in an l l percent jump in<br />
the fatality rate (see ll'able l).<br />
From 1966 through 1973, following the establishment<br />
of a national traffic safety program and<br />
prior to the fuel crisis, traffic fatalities increased<br />
only 6 percent (from 50,894 in 1966 to 54,052 in<br />
1973), a remarkably low increase in view of the 40<br />
percent increase in vehicle miles of travel. This<br />
meant a 25 percent reduction in the fatality rate<br />
(from 5.48 to 4.ll).<br />
Following the fuel crisis in 1973, and imposition<br />
of the 55-mph national maximum speed limit in<br />
January 1974 (Figure l), the number of fatalities<br />
for 1974 dropped to 45,196, compared with 54'052<br />
in 1973 (Table l). This represented a saving of<br />
9,000 lives, and was a major trend reversal in light<br />
of a reduction in highway travel of less than 3 percent.<br />
The lower level of deaths continued during<br />
1975 and 1976 (see Tables I and 2). When consideration<br />
is given to the fact that the availability of<br />
fuel permitted travel to increase during these years<br />
I<br />
'1
t#<br />
utMl<br />
Speed lJmit $rugc.esg,<br />
at the rate of approximately 5 percent a year, it is<br />
apparent that the national 55-mph speed limit has<br />
proved its value as a fuel economy measure and as<br />
a life saving measure.<br />
Average speeds soon began inching up, and some<br />
of the States reduced or eliminated penalties for<br />
infractions of the law. Rising speeds, coupled with<br />
the growth in traffic volume, raised the number of<br />
traffic deaths to 47,671 in 1977. These are not just<br />
statistic$, but lives; 3,150 more individuals dead in<br />
1977 than in 1975.<br />
, r ,rrll: tt4<br />
, ,,,r ttmlF<br />
, futi&:<br />
' irilr, riLt4frl<br />
, r,ri 1nry<br />
. , i,rj4 lS<br />
, t, ,, irr,lki<br />
, I r, lrrlrfl<br />
{lrd $ idH4ttd4f ,it l4Mltydp<br />
ri ufidd<br />
' 'l 'rt a i, rwqlgp rryt<br />
3tr, fi #rd4 lfflfi]{t<br />
' r*l ,rt*,n, fo r,{ ftdlcrd Frtrfted<br />
\ \t le ,l'ff| lt sr ld ${dt,l<br />
Figure 1. 55's the Limit<br />
There is a way by which the value of the traffic<br />
safety effort can be roughly measured. If the fatality<br />
rate had remained constant since 1967, the<br />
direct economic cost would probably now exceed<br />
876 billion each year, and traffic deaths would approximate<br />
77,000 annually. Table 3 demonstrates<br />
what might have happened without the positive<br />
effects of the motor vehicle and highway safety<br />
standards and institution of the 55-mph speed<br />
limit.<br />
z<br />
Many research projects have advanced the stateof-the-art<br />
of traffic safety. Safety devices have<br />
been evolved and incorporated in vehicles in the<br />
manufacturing proces$. Remedial measures have<br />
been applied to the traffic system by means of<br />
numerous Federal, State, and community programs.<br />
Among the more important motor vehicle safety<br />
programs are (1) defect investigations and recalls,<br />
(2) research safety vehicles to advance automotive<br />
safety technology, (3) issuance of the final passive<br />
restraint rule for passenger vehicles, (4) research<br />
and plans to upgrade safety standards for light<br />
trucks and vans, (5) the upgrading of school bus<br />
safety standards, and (6) research to determine<br />
ways of eliminating vehicle hazards, such as truck<br />
underride, battery explosions, and electrical system<br />
failure.<br />
Despite solid gains made over the years, there are<br />
persistent problems that prevent more rapid progress.<br />
To date, Federal rulemaking has not brought
light trucks and vans up to the safety level of<br />
passenger cars, although these vehicles are increasingly<br />
used for both passenger travel and utility<br />
Table 2. Analysis of 1976 Traflic Accident<br />
Fatalities*<br />
1976 Deaths<br />
Motor Vehicle Occupant Fatalities 33,790<br />
Passenger Car 26,645<br />
Truck<br />
6,130<br />
Bus<br />
Oth€r<br />
73<br />
s42<br />
Other Traffic Fatalltles<br />
Pedestrians<br />
Motorcyclists<br />
Pedalcyclists<br />
Other<br />
Total: 1976 Traffic Accident<br />
Fatalities<br />
7,427<br />
3,312<br />
914<br />
80<br />
Source: Fatal Accident Reporting System (FAFS)<br />
NHTSA Traff ic Fatalities (30.day def inition)<br />
11,733<br />
45,523<br />
NOTE: 30day deaths represent approximalely 98% of all traflic<br />
deaths.<br />
'1976 is th6 lat€st year for whlch flnal statistica are avallable,<br />
Year<br />
1967<br />
1968<br />
1969<br />
1970<br />
1971<br />
1972<br />
1973<br />
1974<br />
1975<br />
1976<br />
1977<br />
1967<br />
Rate<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
5.25<br />
purposes. The continuing controversy over antilock<br />
brake requirements for large vehicles is limiting<br />
the ultimate safety gains expected from<br />
FMVSS No. l2l.<br />
Seat belt usage, or non-usage, continues to be a<br />
matter of serious concern, as this device protects<br />
the belted+ccupant in a variety of crash situations.<br />
One survey in 16 U.S. cities found that only 18.5<br />
percent of drivers use their belts. At a 70 percent<br />
usage rate, it is estimated that approximately<br />
11,500 lives would be saved annually.<br />
The basic concerns of the National Highway Traffic<br />
Safety Administration (NHTSA) are motor<br />
vehicle and highway safety. To this has been added<br />
the function of issuing and enforcing vehicle fuel<br />
economy standards and the research upon which<br />
to base such standards in the future. These standards<br />
must be established without doing violence to<br />
safety, environmental, and economic considerations.<br />
Emphasis is placed on solutions to problems likely<br />
to produce the most effective results at the lowest<br />
possible cost. The establishment of a rational plan<br />
leading to selection of priorities is essential to this<br />
approach.<br />
Table 3. Llves Saved Due to Fetellty Rets Reductlon<br />
(Irafflc Fatalities-30 Day Deflnition)<br />
Fatalities<br />
(Based on Actual<br />
1967 Rate) Rate<br />
50,724<br />
53,535<br />
55,973<br />
58,487<br />
62,142<br />
66,419<br />
69,'128<br />
67,376<br />
69,865<br />
73,979<br />
76,940<br />
5.25<br />
5.17<br />
5.02<br />
4.72<br />
4.M<br />
4.32<br />
4.11<br />
3.52<br />
3.35<br />
3.23<br />
3.25<br />
Lives Saved<br />
Due to Lives $aved<br />
Actual SSMPH Due to $afety<br />
Deaths Speed Limit Programs<br />
50,724<br />
52,725<br />
53,543<br />
52,627<br />
52,542<br />
54,589<br />
54,052<br />
45,196<br />
44,525<br />
45,50S<br />
47,671<br />
5,070<br />
5,100<br />
4,500<br />
1,600<br />
B;<br />
2,430<br />
5,860<br />
9,600<br />
11,830<br />
15,080<br />
1 7,1 10<br />
20,240<br />
23,970<br />
27,700<br />
Total<br />
Lives<br />
Saved<br />
810<br />
2,430<br />
5,860<br />
9,600<br />
11,830<br />
15,080<br />
22,180<br />
25,340<br />
28,470<br />
29,300<br />
16,270 134,630 150,900<br />
NOTE: 1977 f igures are eslirnated. Statisticel studies incllcale that, while the fatality level remains substantlally lower than the 1973 lev€|,<br />
a growing portion of the saving ls attributable to th6 combinod effect ot all safety standards and programs which meke up thg<br />
national traflic aatetv 6ffort.<br />
q<br />
I<br />
r<br />
I<br />
r l<br />
i
Motor Yehicle Snfety Rulemaking Plan<br />
During 1977, NHTSA drafted a Motor Vehicle<br />
Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking Plan to be<br />
published early in 1978, after review by the Secretary<br />
of Transportation.<br />
With the Secretary's 1977 decision on passive restraints<br />
(discussed in Chapter 4), the most serious<br />
hazard confronting the motoring public (the dangers<br />
associated with frontal crashes only) will be<br />
reduced significantly. When all passenger cars<br />
have been equipped with passive restraints, a<br />
reduction in motor vehicle fatalities approaching<br />
9,0(X) lives per year is anticipated.<br />
The challenge now facing NHTSA is to identify<br />
other areas where the promulgation of safety<br />
standards would significantly enhance the safety<br />
of the public. The existence of a serious problem,<br />
in and of itself, is not a sufficient basis for scheduling<br />
rulemaking. There also must be a reasonable<br />
chance of developing a solution to that problem.<br />
Where problems are recognized and solutions are<br />
not readily apparent, research is required.<br />
In the near-term, there are a number of aspects on<br />
which the agency has been working for several<br />
years, and where feasible solutions are readily<br />
available. Generally, motor vehicle rulemaking<br />
priorities will be in the areas of Occupant Crash<br />
Protection, Light Trucks and Vans, Pedestrian<br />
Safety, and Braking Sysfens.<br />
Having promulgated the passive restraint rule, to<br />
mitigate dangers of frontal crashes, NHTSA will<br />
now emphasize the improvement, of carstocounter<br />
the next most serious cause of injury, side crashes.<br />
Last year, side crashes accounted for more than<br />
I,100 fatalities.<br />
NHTSA proposes to extend passenger car standards<br />
to light trucks and vans. In 1976, almost<br />
5,000 occupants of light trucks and vans suffered<br />
fatal injuries.<br />
In the pedestrian safety area, attention will focus<br />
on accelerated research programs. Rulemaking in<br />
the next 3 or 4 years is expected to have only a<br />
minor impact on fatality levels. Solutions other<br />
than rulemaking, such as highway design and citizen<br />
education, will have a payoff. However, the<br />
unconscionably high level of pedestrian fatalities<br />
(7,400 during 1976) makes full exploration of all<br />
means of increasing pedestrian protection through<br />
vehicle modifications a matter of urgency.<br />
4<br />
NHTSA expects to substantially improve braking<br />
performance of all classes of vehicles. lmprovement<br />
in vehicle braking will lead to commensurate<br />
reduction in both the number and severity of<br />
crashes.<br />
In the process of drawing up the plan, NHTSA<br />
reviewed all pending actions, particularly those<br />
with low priority. As a result, some lg open rulemaking<br />
actions are to be terminated.<br />
Motor vehicle fuel economy rulemaking will continue<br />
along the same lines as in 1977 (see Chapter<br />
7). NHTSA will establish average fuel economy<br />
standards for vans and light trucks under 10,000<br />
pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). Additionally,<br />
emphasis will be on research and development,<br />
coupled with standards reappraisal as additional<br />
data become available.<br />
Priority Progrnms<br />
NHTSA priority programs in 19'77 included (l)<br />
fuel economy, (2) data acquisition, analysis, and<br />
reporting, (3) occupant safety, and (4) defects investigations<br />
and standards enforcement.<br />
Four other 1977 priority programs (reappraisal of<br />
highway safety standards, enforcement of the<br />
55-mph speed limit, alcohol and highway safety,<br />
and pedestrian safety) are discussed in a companion<br />
report "Highway Safety, a Report by the<br />
President on the Administration of the Highway<br />
Safety Act of 1966, as amended."<br />
Fuel Economy<br />
When it passed the Energy Policy and Conservation<br />
Act of 1975, the Congress recognized the<br />
crucial economic and strategic importance to this<br />
country of reducing national dependence on imported<br />
petroleum and conserving our finite fossil<br />
fuel resources. This Act amended the Motor Vehicle<br />
and Cost Savings Act of 1972 to include Title<br />
V, which charges the Secretary of Transportation<br />
with the issuance of standards to improve the fuel<br />
economy of motor vehicles. Authority to administer<br />
the fuel economy program was delegated to the<br />
Administrator of NHTSA.* There have been two<br />
rAIl actions are subject to review by the Sccrctary, the Dcpartnrent<br />
of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency and,<br />
on a case by case basis, the Department of Commerce, the<br />
Council on Wage and Price Stability, the Council on Environmental<br />
Quality, and the Economic Policy Board,
annual reports to the Congress, for 1976 and<br />
1977*, which describe the work done to date; the<br />
standards issued and proposed; the regulations<br />
governing procedures, definitions, and reports;<br />
the comprehensive research program undertaken;<br />
and the effects of the standards on fuel savings<br />
and consumer costs. (See Chapter 7 for the standards<br />
and regulations issued, and the plans and<br />
research undertaken by the NHTSA fuel economy<br />
program).<br />
A NHTSA study, "The Effect of the Fuel Shortage<br />
on Travel and Highway Safety", summarizes<br />
tests on fuel consumption. It estimates that, if the<br />
55-mph speed limit were strictly observed, total<br />
motor fuel consumption could be reduced by as<br />
much as 4 percent (about ?00,000 barrels of gasoline<br />
a day), a savings sufficient to justify the speed<br />
limit solely as an energy conservation measure.<br />
A Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)<br />
study estimated that reduced speeds saved between<br />
.8 and 2.9 percent of total 1975 highway fuel consumption.<br />
Other estimates suggest a reduction of<br />
about I.4 percent in gasoline consumption.<br />
While energy conservation motivated the law,<br />
another benefit became of major importance-a<br />
reduction in traffic fatalities of 9,000 a year, of<br />
which at least half may be attributed to the 55-mph<br />
speed limit. Even though average speeds have increased<br />
sliehtly in 1976 and 1977, the lifesaving<br />
benefit continues.<br />
I)ata Acquisition, Analysls, and Reporting<br />
Progress in traffic safety is dependent upon the<br />
breadth and validity of the data upon which it is<br />
based. A strong analytical foundation is required<br />
to reveal trends, uncover problems, establish<br />
priorities, allocate resources, appraise current and<br />
prospective standards, and formulate better safety<br />
standards.<br />
The National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />
(NCSA) was established in 1976, incorporating<br />
NHTSA's existing $tatistical unit. Through a graduated<br />
national program of field studies and pilot<br />
tests, NCSA is expanding its ability to collect<br />
timely and reliable accident data on drivers, pedestrians,<br />
vehicles, collision types, injuries, environmental<br />
factors, and exposure. When the statistical<br />
center's programs are fully operational, NHTSA<br />
*Available from<br />
NHTSA.<br />
Ceneral Services Division/Distribution,<br />
will be treating the statistics of highway safety<br />
problems as a whole rather than in fragmented<br />
parts. (See Chapter 3 for details of the statistical<br />
reporting and analysis system).<br />
Occuprnt Safety-Passive Restmints<br />
There are presently two basic approaches to saving<br />
more lives and avoiding serious injuries through<br />
occupant restraint systems. The first is legalistic.<br />
More than 20 nations and twoprovinces of Canada<br />
have enacted mandatory seat belt use laws to increase<br />
usage, and thereby the effectiveness, of<br />
existing seat-belt systems. The other way is to install<br />
automatic passive restraint systems in passenger<br />
cars in place of, or in conjunction with, active<br />
belt systems. These systems are passive in the sense<br />
that no action by the occupant is required to benefit<br />
from the restraint protection. The two forms of<br />
passive restraints that have been commercially<br />
produced are inflatable occupant restraints (commonly<br />
known as air bags) (Figure 2) and passive<br />
belts.<br />
The Secretary of Transportation announced in<br />
June 1977 that FMVSS No. 208 for occupant<br />
Figure 2. Air Bag Demonstration<br />
I ll
crash protection in new passenger cars was being<br />
amended to require the provision of front-seat<br />
"passive"<br />
restraint protection in passenger cars<br />
on a graduated basis, beginning with the largest<br />
cars in September 1981, and including all passenger<br />
cars manufactured on or after September l,<br />
1983. (For additional information on Standard<br />
No. 208, see Chapter 4).<br />
Defects Investigations and Standsrds Enforcement<br />
In addition to enforcing compliance with the established<br />
motor vehicle safety standards, NHTSA<br />
investigates possible safety defects of vehicles and<br />
equipment not covered by safety standards, and<br />
requires the manufacturers to recall such vehicles<br />
or equipment and remedy the safety defects. There<br />
were more vehicles recalled in the United States<br />
for correction of safety defects in1977 than in any<br />
other year in history-26 safety defect recall campaigns<br />
involving 12.9M vehicles. Theroleof standards<br />
enforcement is to test vehicles and equipment<br />
to make certain they comply with the standards<br />
Table 4. National Highway Ttafflc Safety Administration Historicaf and Legistative Background<br />
Year<br />
1924 to<br />
1966<br />
1924<br />
1937<br />
1946<br />
1954<br />
1956<br />
1958<br />
and, if they do not, requiie the manufact*rers to<br />
issue recalls and remedy any defects. During the<br />
past year, 303 compliance investigations were<br />
initiated and 28t investigations were closed. Additional<br />
duties include enforcement of fuel economy<br />
standards and consumer protection regulations.t<br />
(For further information, see Chapter 6.)<br />
Recent Addltlons to ffHfSn Responslblllties<br />
In August 1977, the President approved the Department<br />
of Energy Organization Act (p.L. gj-gt),<br />
which amended Section 502 of the Motor Vehicle<br />
Information and Cost Saving Act. This amendment<br />
requires the Secretary of Transportation to<br />
consult and coordinate with the Secretary of<br />
Energy on the establishment, reduction, or amendment<br />
of the average fuel economy standards for<br />
motor vehicles.<br />
Table 4 provides the historical and legislative<br />
background<br />
for NHTSA and its predecessors.<br />
Traffic<br />
Fatalities* i , i: i Publiclaw<br />
18,400<br />
50,894<br />
Federal Government organizations concerned with highway safety:<br />
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare<br />
Department of Commerce<br />
Post Off ice Department<br />
Department of Defense<br />
General Services Administration<br />
Interstate Commerce Commission<br />
i. r' r. , i ,<br />
Interdepartmental Hlghway safety Board<br />
President's Committee for Highway Safety<br />
18,400<br />
37,819<br />
31,874<br />
33,990<br />
37,965<br />
35,331<br />
National Conference on Street and Highway Safety (convened by<br />
Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover).<br />
:, ::i r,i<br />
Second National Conference on Street and Highway Safety.<br />
Report: Guides to Traffic Satety.<br />
Third National Conference produced an Action Program tor Highway<br />
Safety.<br />
The President's Committee for Traffic Safety established and<br />
adopted the Action Program.<br />
First Congressional interest; Subcommittee Health and Safety of<br />
the House Committee on lnterstate Commerce.<br />
Secretary of Commerce authorized to assist in carrying out the pres. ,<br />
ident's Action Program and to cooperate with the States in furthering<br />
highway safety.<br />
Interstate compacts for Traffic safety (Beamer Resolution).<br />
p.L. g5.6g4
Table { Natlonal Hlghway Tralflc Srfety Admlnlstrrtlon Hlstodcal and Leglslatlve Backgrcund<br />
(Contlnuefl<br />
Trafflc<br />
YEar FatalitiEs' Public Law<br />
1959 #,223<br />
1960 36,399<br />
1961 36.285<br />
1962<br />
1965<br />
1966<br />
1972<br />
1973<br />
1974<br />
1975<br />
38,980<br />
47,089<br />
50,894<br />
1967 ffi,724<br />
1968 62,725<br />
1970<br />
52.627<br />
54,589<br />
54,05?<br />
45,196<br />
44,525<br />
Report by the secretary of commsrce to congress on magnltude of<br />
traffic safety problems, and the role the_Fedaral Governmsnt $hould<br />
play in attacking them.<br />
Flequirements for Passenger-Carrying Motor VehiclEs Purchased for<br />
Use by the Federal Government to M€et Certain Saf€ty Standards.<br />
Prohibition of UsE in Commerce of any Motor Vehicle Which Discharges<br />
Substances in Amounts Found by the Surgeon General to<br />
be Injurious to Human Health.<br />
Registratlon of AutomobilE License Revocations (Natlonal Driver<br />
Register).<br />
Amendmants<br />
Amendmants<br />
Flequirements for Passsnger-Carrylng Motor vehiclss for Use by the<br />
Federal Government to Ms€t Certain Safety $tandards.<br />
Hydraulic Brake Fluld Specifications.<br />
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle $afety Act of 1966. Established P.L.89-563<br />
the National Traffic Safety Agency in the Department of Commerce.<br />
Highway Safety Act of 1966. Established the National Highway P.L.89.564<br />
$afety Agency in the Depertment of Commerce.<br />
Department of Transportation Act of 1966.<br />
P.1.8+670<br />
Executive Order 11357 combined the two agencies in the Department<br />
of Transportation as the National Hlghway Safety Bureau.<br />
National Trafflc and Motor Vehlcle Safety Act of 1966, amendments. P.L. 91.265<br />
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970.<br />
P.L.91,605<br />
Report of the Presldsnt's Task Force on Highway Safety: Mobility<br />
Without Mayhem.<br />
Motor Vehicle Informatlon and Cost Savings Act.<br />
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle $afety Act Amendments of 1972.<br />
Federal-Aid Hlghway Act of 1973.<br />
Motor Vehicle and Schoolbus Safgty Amendments of 1974'<br />
Federal-Aid Highway Amendments of 1974.<br />
Energy Pollcy and Conssrvation Act e$tablished the Automotlve Fuel<br />
Economy Program by adding a new Title V to the Motor Vehicle Infor'<br />
mation and Cost Savings Act.<br />
P.L. 85-515<br />
P.L.86493<br />
P"L.86460<br />
P.1.87-359<br />
P.L.89-563<br />
P.1.88-515<br />
P.L. 87-637<br />
$tandards tor Automoblle SEat Belts Sold or $hipped In Interstatg P.1.88-201<br />
Commerce.<br />
Amendment to the Federal-Aicj Highway Act providing for Voluntary P.1.89-139<br />
$tate Highway Safety Standards (Baldwin Amendment).<br />
Repoft of the Secretary's Advisory Commlttee on Traflic Safety<br />
(Department of Health, Education, and Welfare).<br />
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, amendments F.L.9G285<br />
t6rminated tgmporary exemption authority by statute three years<br />
after enactment,<br />
P.L. 92-513<br />
P.L. 92-548<br />
P.L. 93-87<br />
P.L. S3-492<br />
P.1.93.&t3<br />
P.L. S4.163<br />
{<br />
!l r<br />
"rj<br />
i
Table 4. Natlonal Highway Tralflc Safety Adminlstratlon Hlstorlcal and Leglslatlve Background<br />
(Gontinued)<br />
Trafflc<br />
Year Fatalities* Public Law<br />
1976 45,523 Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1976.<br />
National Traffic and Motor Vehiclesafety<br />
Act<br />
Authorization.<br />
Motor Vehicle Information and CostSavings<br />
Act<br />
1976.<br />
P.1.94_280<br />
Amendment<br />
and P.L.94-346<br />
Amendments<br />
of P.L.94-364<br />
SOURCE*Fatalities: 1924-.1974, Natlonal Center for Heelth Statlstlcs, HEW, and Stat€ annual summaries (adjusted to 30-dey<br />
deaths,.<br />
1S75-1976, Fatal Accident Heporting System (FAHS), NHTSA,<br />
*Traffic fatalitles are deaths resultlng trom motor vehicle eccidents occurring on trafficways. Statistics r6pr6s€nt d6eths occurring within<br />
30 days after the date of the accldent, whlch conslitutB approximately 98% of all traffic deaths.
THE STANDARDS SUMMARY 1977<br />
A chronological table at the end of this summary<br />
lists Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />
(FMVSS) and Regulations issued since January<br />
1967, with initial effective dates.<br />
The following regulation wus issued and became<br />
effective during this reporting period:<br />
Part 556-Exemption for Inconsequential Defect<br />
or Noncompliance<br />
This regulation sets forth procedures for exempting<br />
manufacturers of motor vehicles and replacement<br />
equipment from notice and remedy requirements<br />
when a defect or noncompliance is found to<br />
be inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle<br />
safety. (Effective March 9, 1977).<br />
The following significant amendments were issued<br />
and became effective during this reporting period:<br />
Standard No. 109*New Pneumatic Tires<br />
The amendment permits manufacture of a new<br />
series of tires having load ratings and inflation<br />
pressures expressed only in metric units, in order<br />
to conform with a world-wide standardization<br />
process. The amendment also allows substitution<br />
of newly designed tires with maximum inf'lation<br />
pressure of 60 psi for conventional spare tires.<br />
This substitution reduces the overall weight and<br />
increases the storage space of passenger cars. (Effective<br />
March 7, 1977).<br />
Standard No. 120-7r7e Selection and Rims for<br />
Motor Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars<br />
This standard requires that the wheels of all vehicles,<br />
except passenger cars, be equipped with tires<br />
and rims that are adequate to support the fullyloaded<br />
vehicles under normal operating condition$.<br />
As of February 7, 1977, the amendment<br />
affects tire and rim selection, rim marking, and<br />
tire label information. This amendment also sets<br />
forth the Department of Transportation (DOT)<br />
decision that it no longer regulates mobile structure<br />
trailers (mobile homes). Conforming amendments<br />
to Standard No. 108, Lamps, Reflective<br />
Devices, and Associated Equipment and to Part<br />
571, Definitions, also were made by this issuance.<br />
Standard No. l2l-,4ir Brake Ststems<br />
Effective June 13, 1977, suspension of the bus<br />
service brake stopping distance requirements contained<br />
in Standard No. l2l was extended to January<br />
l, l9?8, and an additional extension to April<br />
l, 1978, was granted for school buses.<br />
Another amendment added certain vehicles to the<br />
"oversize"<br />
vehicle category and excluded specialized<br />
vehicles from applicability of the standard's<br />
requirements. (Effective August 16, 1977).<br />
Standard No. 205-Glazing Materials<br />
The glazing materials standard was amended to<br />
permit the use of rigid plastic glazing materials in<br />
all bus doors and windows, except the windshields<br />
and those windows located immediately to the left<br />
or right of the driver. (Effective December 22,<br />
re77).<br />
Standard No. 222-^Scltool Bus Passenger Seating<br />
und Crash Protection (Interim Amendment)<br />
Maximum allowable seat spacing for school buses<br />
was increased from 20 to 21 inches, effective<br />
December 22, 1977. This spacing will make more<br />
room for large high school students while still permitting<br />
a safe level of seat performance. The<br />
amendment is interim, and the public, by means<br />
of a separate NPRM, has been provided opportunity<br />
to comment upon the advisability of extending<br />
the maximum seat spacing by one inch.<br />
Part 567-Cer t ifica t ion Re gu la t ion<br />
This change was for the purpose of allowing gross<br />
axle weight ratings to be combined on the certification<br />
label. (Effective June 13, 19'77),<br />
g
Palt 57l-Anthropomorphic Test Dummy<br />
This part describes the anthropomorphic test dummies<br />
that are to be used for testing motor vehicle<br />
compliance with FMVSS. Several elements of the<br />
dummy calibration test procedures were specified,<br />
and minor changes were effected for the dummy<br />
design specifications.<br />
The following amendments were acted upon during<br />
1977, hut did not become effective during the<br />
reporting period:<br />
Part 581-,Bumper Standard<br />
The new bumper standard limits damage to nonsafety-related<br />
components and vehicle surfaces in<br />
low-speed crashes, and incorporates the safetyrelated<br />
damage criteria of FMVSS No. 215, .Exferior<br />
Protection. One amendment sets the effective<br />
date for September l, 1978, and requires no damage<br />
to exterior surfaces or permanent deviations<br />
from original contours, except where such damage<br />
occurs to the bumper face bar and components<br />
that directly attach the bumper fhce bar to the<br />
chassis frame. For vehicles manufactured on or<br />
after September 1, 1979, the exterior surfaces,<br />
except for the bumper face bar, shall have no separations<br />
and no permanent deviations from their<br />
original contour.<br />
Standard No. 208-Occupdnt Crflsh Protection<br />
The existing motor vehicle safety standard for<br />
occupant crash protection was amended, to require<br />
the provision of front seat ''passive" restraintprotection<br />
in passenger cars with wheelbases greater<br />
than 114 inches manufactured on and after September<br />
l, 1981, in passenger cars with wheelbases<br />
greater than 100 inches on or after September l,<br />
1982, and in all passenger car$ manufactured on<br />
or after September l, 1983.<br />
Standard No. Z|Z-Windshield Mounting<br />
The effective date of a 1976 amendment to the<br />
standard was extended from September l,1977 to<br />
September l, 1978, for trucks and multipurpose<br />
vehicles of 10,000 pounds or less, and for vans.<br />
"Walk-in<br />
van-type" vehicles were excluded from<br />
the standard's applicability.<br />
Table 5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Salety Standards and Regulations<br />
Date lssued lnltlal Effectlve Dateg<br />
January 31, 1967 Standard No. 101 Control Location, ldentification, and<br />
lllumination<br />
Standard No. 102<br />
Standard No. 103<br />
Standard No. 104<br />
Standard No. 105<br />
Standard No. 106<br />
Standard No. 107<br />
Standard No. 108<br />
Standard No. 111<br />
$tandard No.201<br />
$tandard No.203<br />
Standard No.204<br />
$tandard No.205<br />
Standard No. 206<br />
Transmlssion Shift Lever Sequence,<br />
Starter Interlock, Transmission<br />
Braking Effect<br />
Windshield Defrostlng and Defogging<br />
Windshield Wiping and Washing<br />
Systems<br />
Hyclraulic Brake Systems<br />
Brake Hoses<br />
Reflecting Surfaces (Chrome Trim)<br />
Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated<br />
Equipment<br />
Rearview Mirrors<br />
Qccupant Protection in Interior lmpact<br />
lmpact Protection for the Driver from the<br />
Steering Control System<br />
$teering Control Rearward Displacement<br />
Glazing Materials<br />
Door Locks and Door Retention<br />
Qomponents<br />
PC-1/1i68; MPV, TL,<br />
B-1/1/72; TR,<br />
B^il1173<br />
PC, MPV, TH, B_1/1/68<br />
PC, MFV-1/1/68<br />
TR, 8-1/1/69<br />
PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />
B-1/1/69<br />
PG-1/1/68; MPV, TB,<br />
B*gt1t74<br />
PC, MPV-1/1/68;TR, B,<br />
TL, MC, E-911174<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B_1/1/68<br />
PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR, B,<br />
TL, MC, E*1/1/69<br />
PC, MPV-1/1/68; TR, B,<br />
MC, E-zt1t76<br />
PC-1/1/68<br />
PC-1/1/68<br />
PC-1/1/68<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B,<br />
MQ-1/1/68<br />
PC-1/1/68<br />
MPv*1/1/70<br />
rH-111172
Table 5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and Regulations (Continued)<br />
Date l8sued lnitial Effective Dates<br />
Standard No.207 Seating Systems<br />
PC-1/1/68, MPV, TR,<br />
rqi r i'<br />
Standard No.2081 Occuoant Crash Protection<br />
B-111172<br />
*PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />
B-7t1t71<br />
Standard No.209 $eat Belt Assemblies<br />
PC, MPV, TR, 8-3/1/67<br />
.i ,, Standard No. 210 Seat Belt Assemhly Anchorages<br />
PC-1/1/68; MPV, TH,<br />
B-7t1t71<br />
Standard No. 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs, and Hub Caps FC, MPV-1/1/68<br />
Standard No.301 Fuel System Integrity<br />
FC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />
B-911175<br />
November 8, 1967 Standard No. 109 New Pneumatic Tires<br />
PC-1/1/68<br />
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims<br />
PC-4/1/68<br />
January 2, 1968 Part 12 Customs Hegulation<br />
PC, MPV, TFt, B, TL, MC<br />
January 3, 1968 Part 568 Vehicles Manufactured In Two or More 1rrlff'U8<br />
Stages<br />
February 1?, 196E Standard No.202 Head Restraints<br />
April 24, 1968 Standard No. 112 Headlamo Concealment Devices<br />
$tandard No. 113 Hood Latch Sy$tems<br />
Standard No. 114 Theft Frolection<br />
July 3, 1968 Standard No. 115 Vehicle ldentification Numbers<br />
August 13, 1968 Standard No. 212 Windshield Mounting<br />
December 24, 1968 Standard No. 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids<br />
January 17, 1969 Part No. 5'67 Certlficatlon Hegulation<br />
Part No.569 Regrooved Tires<br />
PC-1i 1/69<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, MC<br />
1/1/69<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B*1/1/69<br />
PA-1t1t70<br />
PC-1/1/69<br />
PC*1l1l7Q; MPV, TB,<br />
B-9t1t77<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />
MC-1/4/69<br />
PC, MFV, TR, B, TL, MC<br />
8/31/69<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MO,<br />
E-Z2Bi69<br />
March 23, 1970 Standard No. 213 Child Seating Systems<br />
PC, MPV, E-11117'l<br />
TR, B-4/1/71<br />
Juty 17, 1970 Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window SyBtemB<br />
PC, MPV-1/1/71<br />
October 22,1970 Standard No.214 Side Door Strength<br />
PC-1t1t73<br />
PC, MPV, TR, 8-9/1/72<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />
E-8116t71<br />
TR, B, TL-1/1/73<br />
PA-gt1t72<br />
PQ, E-111172<br />
PC-8/15/73<br />
MC-9/1/73<br />
E-1t1t74<br />
PC, MPV, TR, 8-9/1/73<br />
MQ-gt1174<br />
TR, E-1/1/73<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />
July 26, '1973<br />
Part No.575 Consumer Information (Tire Reserve<br />
Load, Acceleration & Passing Ability,<br />
PC, MC-9/30/69<br />
Vehicle Stopping Distance)<br />
November 5, 1970 Part No. 574 Tire ldentification and Record Keeping E-511171<br />
December 31, 1970 $tandard No.302 Flammability of Interior Materials<br />
February 10, 1371 Part 573 Defect Reports<br />
February 19, 1971 Standard No. 121 Alr Brake Sy$tems<br />
April 9, 1971<br />
April 14, 1971<br />
Standard No. 215<br />
Standard No. 117<br />
Exterior Protection (Bumpers)<br />
Retreaded Pneumatic<br />
:<br />
Tires<br />
December 3, 1971 Standard No.216 Roof Crush Resistance<br />
March 1, 1972 Standard No. 122 Motorcycle Brake Systems<br />
Standard No. 125 Warning Devices<br />
March 31, 1972 Standard No. 124 Accelerator Control System$<br />
April 4, 1972 $tandard No. 123 Motorcycle Controls and Di$plays<br />
May 3, 1972 Standard No. 217 Bus Window Retention and Release B-911173<br />
August 3,1972 Standard No. 126 Truck-Camper Loading<br />
January 17,1573 Part No. 577 Defect Notitications<br />
E-st2H73<br />
January 22, 1973 Part No. 555 Temporary Exemptions from Federal<br />
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />
1129173<br />
January 31, 1973 Part No. 580 Odometer Disclosure Requirements rc, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />
Part No. 572 Anthropomorphic Test Dummy<br />
MC*3/1/73<br />
E-W1t73<br />
August 9, 1973 Standard No.218 Motorcycle Helmets<br />
l,n0-3fi174<br />
11<br />
.,
Table 5. Chronology oi Federal Motor Vehlcle Salety Standards and Regulatlons (Contlnued)<br />
Date lssued Initial Effective Dates<br />
November 5, 1973<br />
April 22,1974<br />
August 13, 1S74<br />
January 31, 1975<br />
May 20, 1975<br />
June 9, 1975<br />
September 4, 1975<br />
January 19, 1S76<br />
January 22, 1976<br />
February 27,1976<br />
January 31, 1977<br />
Standard No. '119<br />
Part 553<br />
Part 576<br />
Part 582<br />
Part No,575<br />
Standard No. 219<br />
Part No.552<br />
Standard No. 120<br />
Standard No.220<br />
Standard No. 221<br />
Standard No. 222<br />
Part 581<br />
Part 556<br />
LEGEND: PC-PassengerCars<br />
MPV-Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles<br />
. tF(-trucKs<br />
B-Buses<br />
SB*School Buses<br />
TL-Trailers<br />
MC-Molorcycles<br />
E-Equipment<br />
*Formerly entitled "Seat Belt Installation"<br />
New Pneumatic Tires<br />
Procedures<br />
Records Fletention (lnterim Rule)<br />
Insurance Cost Information Regulatlon<br />
Consumer Inf ormation-Uniform Ti re<br />
Quality Grading<br />
Windshield Zone Intrusion<br />
Petitions for Rulemaking, Dofect and<br />
Noncompliance Orders<br />
Tire Selection and Rims for Vehlcles<br />
Other Than Passenger Cars<br />
School Bus Rollover Protectlon<br />
School Bus Body Joint Strength<br />
School Bus Seating and Crash<br />
Protection<br />
Bumper Standard<br />
Exemption for Inconsequential Defecl or<br />
Noncompliance<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />
E-St1t74<br />
4t25t74<br />
PC, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />
E-U1il77<br />
211t75<br />
PC, E-9/1/74<br />
PC, MPV, TR, 8_9/1/76<br />
1Qt13t75<br />
MPV, TR, B, TL, MC, E<br />
Bt1l76<br />
B-10t28t76<br />
B-10/26/76<br />
B-10/26/76<br />
PC-9/1/78<br />
PC, MPV, TH, B, TL, MC<br />
3/9t77<br />
tlmportant<br />
amendments to Standard No. 208 Include the requirements for shoulder harnesses (1/1/72), reminder buzzer and light (2/25/75),<br />
and passive restraints (by vehicle wheelbase; 9/1/81-9/1/83).
CHAPTER 3<br />
DATA AGQUISITION, ANALYSIS, AND<br />
REPORTING<br />
Evaluation of existing and proposed standards,<br />
identification of problems, formulation of better<br />
safety systems, and development of improved<br />
standards and countermeasures require a strong<br />
statistical and analytical foundation. A comprehensive,<br />
reliable, statistical base is necessary for<br />
the establishment of priorities, the allocation of<br />
resources and, indeed, for all flrogress in highway<br />
safety.<br />
The National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />
has a growing ability to collect valid, timely, and<br />
reliable accident data through a graduated national<br />
program of data collection. The scope of the program<br />
includes drivers, pedestrians, vehicles, collision<br />
types, injuries, environmental factors, and<br />
exposure data.*<br />
A dual approach is used:<br />
l. A national program using State and local<br />
records.<br />
2. On-site investigation of a representative sample<br />
of accidents.<br />
NCSA collects, standardizes, and interprets information<br />
now kept at the State and local levels.<br />
Police accident reports, driver licensing records,<br />
motor vehicle registrations, highway inventories,<br />
medical, and other records are included. Trained<br />
professional teams investigate accidents in the<br />
field, examining such topics as pre-crash factors,<br />
injury mechanisms and crash configurations. This<br />
dual approach covers the full spectrum from<br />
driver and vehicle exposure rates to the causes of<br />
accident injuries.<br />
rlnformation about the amount and types of driving.<br />
The statistics provide national data to track trends<br />
and detect problems such as fatalities by type, injuries<br />
by severity, and involvements by specific<br />
vehicle type. They also constitute an objective<br />
basis to set and evaluate highway and motor vehicle<br />
standards such as thos€ on fuel tank integrity,<br />
side crash protection, and vehicle exterior modification.<br />
NCSA is responsible for accident studies<br />
from the experimental design through data collection,<br />
storage, analysis, and dissemination.<br />
As NCSA's programs become operational, highway<br />
safety problems may be treated as a whole<br />
rather than as fragmented parts. NCSA and its investigation<br />
teams will support the highway safety<br />
research work of industry, private groups, and<br />
Government at all levels, and will coordinate with<br />
other statistical centers and agencies, national and<br />
international.<br />
NCSA operates and manages the following national<br />
data collection systems:<br />
t The National Accident Sampltng System<br />
t/N,4SS/-a network of 35 to 60 teams collecting<br />
nationally representative accident data, performing<br />
special studies, and running exposure surveys.<br />
The first ten teams have completed training and<br />
have started preliminary data collection at the<br />
initial NASS sites (see Figure 3). Following evaluation<br />
of this pilot test, full scale operation of the<br />
NASS Continuous Sampling System will begin at<br />
these sites in 1979. The entire network is expected<br />
to be operational by 1981.<br />
t The Futal Accident Reporting System<br />
(FARS)- now in its fourth year of operation,<br />
provides statistical data on all fatal accidents in<br />
the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto<br />
r3
1|<br />
I<br />
SKAGIT/$AN JUAN/<br />
ISLAND CO.<br />
Rico. Improvements have been made in the standardization<br />
and quality control of information<br />
received from police accident reports, medical<br />
reports, driver licensing files, and highway and<br />
motor vehicle registration files. A remote data<br />
entry proiect to speed accident case submissions to<br />
Washington, I).C. has been tested and is in operation.<br />
Until NASS becomes fully operational, the following<br />
interim systems will supply data necded to support<br />
NHTSA rulemaking:<br />
o The National Crash Severity Study (NCSS/ is<br />
an eflfort to link vehicle damage with injury severity.<br />
More than 10,000 towaway accidents are being<br />
investigated by seven teams throughout the country<br />
over a 3-year period. Special emphasis will be<br />
placed on certain accident types, to permit evaluation<br />
of the standards on fire and fuel leakage and<br />
on side door guard beams, and to examine the<br />
possible extension of passenger car safety standards<br />
to light trucks, vans, and multipurpose<br />
passenger vehicles.<br />
t The Pedestrian Injury Causation Study<br />
(Prcil was initiated to examine injury causes during<br />
vehicle/pedestrian collisions. Five accident<br />
t4<br />
!Ir4I!M<br />
CENTRAL CITY: 1O LARG EST SMSAs<br />
CENTRAL CITY oF rr.60 LARGEST SMSA9<br />
ill SUBUFSAN dF 17 LARGEST SMSA9: LOW GA$ $ALES<br />
SUBURtsAN OF 17 LAHGEST SMSAs: NIGH GA$ SALES<br />
SUBLIRBAN OF 18 60 LAFGE$T $M$As PLU$ PSUr WITHIN<br />
61. I 1 9 LA R6 EST SMSAS NdT CONT AI NI NG C ENT RAL C I TY<br />
pSU WITHIN 61 119 LAffGEST SMSATCONTAINING CENTRAL clTY<br />
vtl ALL OTHEH AREASj PSUs CONTAINING TOWNS OV6H I97I8;<br />
LOW GAS SALES<br />
Vlll ALL OTHEn AAEA$; P$Ur CONTATNING TOVINS OVER l97l8j<br />
HIGH GAS SALES<br />
lX ALL OTHER AREAS; PSUtWITH NO TOWN OVER 1S7lE;<br />
LOW GAS SALES<br />
x ALLOTHERAHEA$;FSUTWIIHNOTOWNOVEAI9TISi<br />
HIGH GAS SALES<br />
ABKNSAS<br />
t --t-r-!ffiJ*'"<br />
-\ \.<br />
onrrns OALLAS co. CO. exir. EXCL. / (BIRMINGHAM<br />
IBIRMINGHAM suBURl<br />
oALLAs ctTY L_ {vl<br />
Figure 3. NationalAccldent Sampllng System<br />
tvil t)<br />
I<br />
DF LAWARE CO.<br />
PEN NSY LVANIA<br />
{PHILADELPHIA $UBUFB}<br />
FT, LAUOEFOALE/<br />
HOLLYWOOD CITY<br />
FLORIOA<br />
{ilI<br />
teams will investigate more than 2,0(X) selected<br />
accidents during a 3-year period. The study will<br />
identify such injury-producing agents as "unforgiving"<br />
protrusions and may have major implications<br />
on vehicle profile design.<br />
t The Injury Severity Reporting System rISRS/,<br />
an extension of the Consumer Product Safety<br />
Commission's National Electronic lnjury Surveillance<br />
System, will provide data on traffic accident<br />
injuries from persons admitted to emergency<br />
rooms in 130 hospitals. The system will identify<br />
primary injuries, overall injury severity, and some<br />
related basic accident descriptors.<br />
Differential Yelocity Crash Recorder<br />
A mechanical, cigarette-packet-sized crash recorder<br />
is being developed and evaluated for its<br />
ability to sense automatically and record the differential<br />
velocity of a vehicle undergoing a crash.<br />
The recorder would be dormant, but ready to<br />
record, under normal vehicle operating conditions.<br />
When perfected, the crash recorder will permit the<br />
accumulation of accident data (differential crash<br />
velocities) at about $4*$6 per vehicle on a high<br />
volume basis.
CHAPTER 4<br />
CRASH<br />
SURVIVABILITY<br />
Occupant Protection<br />
Volkswagen Rabbit, and may be installed on other<br />
vehicles.<br />
On June 30, 1977, the Secretary of Transportation,<br />
Brock Adams. announced that all full-sized<br />
passenger cars manufactuted for sale or use in the<br />
United States must be equipped with fronr-seat<br />
passive restraint systems to protect occupants<br />
from injury in crashes, beginning with the lg8z<br />
model year (MY). In MY 1983, all intermediate<br />
and compact cars must be so equipped, and by<br />
MY 1984, all passenger cars will be required to<br />
have front-seat passive protection systems.<br />
The design and type of system to be used is the<br />
manufacturer's option, but he must certify that<br />
the vehicle meets the performance requiremcnts of<br />
FMVSS No. ?08, Occupant Crash Protection.<br />
The second system is the air-cushion or air bag.<br />
The air-cushion system consists of a crash sensor<br />
near the front side of the vehicle, a passenger air<br />
bag and inflator in the right side of the dashboard,<br />
a driver air bag and intlator in the hub of the steering<br />
wheel, knee restraints, and a diagnostic system<br />
to monitor readiness. If the car is involved in a<br />
frontal crash equivalent to or rnore than a l0- to<br />
l2-mph crash into a solid barrier, the impact<br />
causes the sensor to activate the inflator. The<br />
occupants' torsos and heads move forward into<br />
the soft bags, while the lower bodies are restrained<br />
by air bags or knee restraints. The air bag and<br />
knee restraints absorb the occupants' energy by<br />
The generally negative response of the American distributing forces more evenly over their bodies.<br />
motoring public to the protection from automobile<br />
crash injuries that lap and shoulder belrs can<br />
furnish motivated the mandate from Secretary<br />
Adams. Last year, more than 26,600 passenger car<br />
occupants were killed in crashes. Of these, more<br />
than 23,100 were drivers or front-seat pas$engers.<br />
One-hundred percent use of the lap and shoulder<br />
The cost of air-cushion systems ranges from $90 to<br />
$235, depending upon the assumptions made.<br />
DOT estimate$ that full front-seat air-cushion<br />
systems will cost $l l2 once they are in full production.<br />
Passive-belt systerns are estimated to cost<br />
between $25 and $50.<br />
belts (required in cars since 1968) would have pre- DOT estimates that 9,000 lives will be saved and<br />
vented more than 50 percent of these fatalities. 65,000 moderate-to-serious injuries will be pre-<br />
Safety belts must be fastened each time the occupant<br />
gets into the car to be effective. For a variety<br />
of reasons, only about 20 percent of the motoring<br />
vented each year, once all cars are equipped with<br />
passive restraints. The small additional cost of<br />
passive restraints is well worth it, considering that<br />
public bothers to buckle up. Passive re$traints, on the current estimated cost to society of each traffic<br />
the other hand, require no buckling or fastening to fataliry is over $280,000.<br />
be effective. They are there, and operational,<br />
when a crash occurs.<br />
During 1977, extensive testing of child restraint<br />
$ystems was conducted by NHTSA's new Engi-<br />
Currently, there are two basic types of passive neering Test Facility (ETF) at East Liberty, Ohio.<br />
restraint systems. One is a safety-belt sysfem that Under an agreement with the Transportation<br />
is designed to move into place when the front-seat Research Center (TRC), the ETF urilizes the dy-<br />
occupants enter the vehicle and close the doors.<br />
(Figure 4). There is no action required by the occupants.<br />
Passive belts are currently available on the<br />
namic crash simulation facility for quick reaction<br />
tests to support rulemaking activities. NHTSA is<br />
considering a new child restraint safety standard,<br />
15<br />
i
*W<br />
to be published during 1978. Some 20 types of<br />
child restraints were tested during the past year t'or<br />
conformity with the proposed criteria. (Figures 5<br />
and 6).<br />
Vehicle Structures<br />
Programs are underway to improve side impact<br />
crashworthiness of comp.act and subcompact<br />
vehicles through minor modifications to ther side<br />
structures. Weight increases for given levels of improvement<br />
in structural integrity will be determined.<br />
Data generated from both crush and crash<br />
testing (Figure 7) determine correlations between a<br />
variety of side impact $tatic and dynamic deformations.<br />
lt has been found that reduction in side<br />
intrusion can be achieved with modifications involving<br />
only modest weight addition to the front<br />
door structure. This has been achieved by:<br />
r Increasing the strength of the door beams.<br />
r Placing the door beams at elevations where<br />
they engage the vehicle bumper striking them during<br />
impact.<br />
16<br />
Figure 4. Automatlc Safety Belt System<br />
r Modifying the door structure so that the<br />
door, the pillars, and the sill behave more as a unit<br />
during impact.<br />
Investigations also are underway to evaluate the<br />
effects that modification of side structure interior<br />
Figure 5. Child and Infant Restraint Systems
W<br />
Figure 6. Experimental Child Restrainl $eat<br />
padding will have on reducing vehicle occupant<br />
injuries during side impact.<br />
A moving barrier impactor and test procedures to<br />
analyze and assess vehicle side structures also are<br />
being developed, to facilitate the analysis of vehicle<br />
side structures in compliance testing, and to<br />
furnish a more reliable test device.<br />
Other side impact tests are being run, to validate<br />
an advanced computer simulation program called<br />
'*Wrecker,"<br />
which is designed to predict vehicle<br />
structural deformations. The result.s can be applied<br />
to improving vehicle crashworthiness.<br />
Another computer program ("Safety Systerns Optimization<br />
Model"), now being refined, will make<br />
possible analysis of occupant response in a variety<br />
of collisions between vehicles of differing designs.<br />
Pedestrinn Protection<br />
The feasibility of designing exrerior surfaces of<br />
motor vehicles that are less injurious to pedestrians<br />
was fostered by a computer study and a<br />
limited number of dummy tests. A test device that<br />
measures the characteristics of specific vehicle surfaces<br />
with various body forms has been designed.<br />
Tests are underway to demonstrate that there is a<br />
potential for specifying the responses of these<br />
body forms, so as to mitigate pedestrian injuries<br />
without sacrificing safety and functional requirements.<br />
A description of additional work on pedestrian<br />
protection may be found in the section on lntegrated<br />
Vehicle Systems.<br />
.#Fitfrte{#rflri{'i{'r' :<br />
Figure 7. $ide lmpact Testing to Determine<br />
a Variety of Deformations<br />
17
Biomechanics<br />
The development of a safety syslem requires an<br />
instrument that can record and assess the occupant<br />
crash protection provided by that system. Such an<br />
instrument is the anthropomorphic test dummy<br />
(Figure 8). In order to be effective, the dummy<br />
must possess two basic characteristics.<br />
First, it must respond in a reasonably human-like<br />
way when it is subjected to forces typical of a crash<br />
environment. Secondly, these responses must be<br />
related to the level of injury which would have<br />
Figure 8. Adult Male DummY<br />
occurred to a human had he responded similarly.<br />
Laboratory testing and computer modeling are<br />
used to define these characteristics. The research<br />
will culminate in a test dummy that possesses a<br />
high level of human fidelity and can, through its<br />
responses, predict injury to actual humans more<br />
accurately than is otherwise possible.<br />
An anthropomorphic child dummy, with which to<br />
test compliance with child restraint systems, has<br />
been selected and modified. Future plans include<br />
judicious exercise of mathematical models designed<br />
to simulate the child; this is expected to<br />
yield data for the design and construction of valid<br />
child dummies.<br />
During the last year, research has continued to<br />
define the relationship between force application<br />
and the response of the thorax and the head/neck<br />
complex, especially in side and rear crashes, As<br />
mentioned above, results of this research will be<br />
used to develop test dummy specifications for a<br />
more human-like dummy. Additionally, the research<br />
is leading to a greater understanding of the<br />
relationship between force application, human<br />
response, and injury. This expansion of the data<br />
base on injury criteria will permit design of dummies<br />
whose motions and impacts can be better correlated<br />
with human injury. The responses will be<br />
sufficiently repeatable for use in compliance test<br />
procedures.<br />
Integrated Vehicle Systems Program<br />
The Integrated Vehicle Systems program, formerly<br />
the Research Safety Vehicle (RSV) program,<br />
is developing experimental vehicles that will<br />
permit survival of occupants in a variety of severe<br />
crashes, and will simultaneously meet other national<br />
goals in pedestrian safety, fuel economy,<br />
emissions, damageability, and cost of ownership<br />
(Table 6).<br />
Initial RSV studies made in 1974 by five Phase I<br />
contractors developed specifications for experimental<br />
four and five-passenger vehicles to meet<br />
the goals of the 1980's. From results of this research,<br />
two contractors (Calspan Corporation of<br />
Bulfalo, New York, and Minicars, Inc., of Coleta,<br />
California) were selected to continue the design<br />
and development of their proposed vehicle concepts<br />
under Phase II contracts (197511976).<br />
During the past year, under DOT contracts for<br />
Phase III of the RSV program, Calspan and Mini-
Table 6. Comparison of Integrated Vehicle System Goals<br />
Typlcal 1977<br />
Production Small Car<br />
VW<br />
Research Vehicle<br />
Calspan/Chrysler<br />
Research Vehicle<br />
Vehlcle Weight 3500 2000 3000 2570<br />
Vehicle compartment<br />
No. of pass.<br />
Volume<br />
Performance<br />
0 to 60 mph accel.<br />
60 to 0 mph braking dlstance<br />
Occupant crash protection<br />
Frontal barrier<br />
Car-to-car side<br />
Bumper protection (no damage')<br />
Fronl<br />
Bear<br />
Gombined cycle fuel economy<br />
Gasoline engine<br />
Research diesel<br />
5 Passenger<br />
68-87 cu. ft.<br />
10-20 sec.<br />
165-190 ft.<br />
Level I<br />
Up to 30 mph'<br />
Up to 20 mph-<br />
5 mph..<br />
5 mph.*<br />
11-42 mpg<br />
5 Passen-gtr<br />
80 cu, ft,<br />
13.5 sec.<br />
167 ft.<br />
Level ll<br />
,10 mph<br />
30 mph<br />
5 mph'*<br />
5 mph"<br />
34 mpg<br />
60 mpg<br />
5 Passenger<br />
83 cu. ft.<br />
16-18 sec.<br />
153 ft.<br />
Level lll<br />
45-50 mph<br />
40-45 mph<br />
I mph<br />
5 mph<br />
30 mpg<br />
42 mpg<br />
Mlnlcars<br />
Research Vehicle<br />
4 Passenger<br />
98 cu. ft.<br />
16 sec.<br />
131<br />
ft.<br />
Level lll<br />
50 + mph<br />
45 + mph<br />
10 mph<br />
5 mph<br />
34 mpg<br />
55 mpg<br />
Emissions Level I Level ll Level ll Level ll<br />
'Assum€s<br />
rggtralnt systems ar6 worn<br />
**Damage<br />
to non-safety-related it€ms allow€d<br />
cars have continued work to complete their<br />
designs and fabricate test vehicles.<br />
(l) Vehicle Occupant Protection<br />
(2) Aggressivity Limitation<br />
Phase IV activity, including crash testing of the<br />
research vehicles, will begin in 1978, forevaluation<br />
of safety, emissions, fuel economy, and damageability.<br />
In addition to creating a data base for<br />
future safety, damageability, and fuel economy<br />
standards, the program is expected to demonstrate<br />
the levels of performance that can be expected and<br />
to encourage industry to adopt the technological<br />
advances and innovations. The RSV program is a<br />
continuation of the Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />
(3) Pedestrian Protection<br />
(4) Aerodynamic Drag Reduction<br />
(5) weieht<br />
(6) Headlamp Installation<br />
(7) Engine Cooling Airflow<br />
(8) Low-Speed Collision Damage Reduction<br />
(9) Appearance<br />
(10) Cost<br />
(l l) Material Applications<br />
(12) Producibility<br />
(ESV) program under which ESV's were developed<br />
and evaluated in the United States, and under<br />
which the International ESV Program (see Special<br />
Programs, International Cooperation) was initiated<br />
and supported.<br />
The Calspan RSV project will result in the design<br />
of an integrated automobile. Evaluations of vehicles<br />
built to this design will provide data on the<br />
effectiveness of the many trade-off decisions<br />
necessary to reach the final design. For example,<br />
the major design considerations for the front end<br />
of an RSV are:<br />
These considerations involve safety (1, 2, and 3),<br />
fuel economy (4 and 5), and vehicle performance<br />
(6 and 7) as well as consumer concerns for cost<br />
and appearance (8, 9, and l0). While some of<br />
these considerations are clearly compatible and<br />
can be satisfied with a common approach, others<br />
are conflicting and some trade-offs must be made.<br />
Retractable headlamps, for example, provide a<br />
smooth aerodynamic shape when retracted, but<br />
add cost and weight and pose a potential pedestrian<br />
hazard when raised for night operations.<br />
Plastic headlamp covers that smooth aerodynamic<br />
19
flow (see Figure 9) have been eliminated from<br />
U.S. cars because of FMVSS No. 108 restrictions<br />
on the potential impairment of light effectiveness'<br />
For the Calspan RSV, these covers increase fuel<br />
economy by 1.5 mpg on the Environmental Protection<br />
Agency (EPA) highway cycle (0.8 mpg<br />
combined highway and city). Headlamp performance<br />
will be evaluated to determine the severity of<br />
any light degradation.<br />
Pedestrian injury reduction is obtained on the<br />
Calspan RSV by the use of "soft" foam-filled<br />
front bumpers into which slots are cut to permit<br />
airflow for radiator cooling. Closing off some of<br />
these slots would potentially improve pedestrian<br />
protection and reduce drag, but might also cause<br />
the engine to overheat.<br />
The design solution for the Calspan RSV frontend<br />
is an outstanding example of engineering<br />
improvements attainable through attention to<br />
trade*offs. Pedestrian protection concepts have<br />
been incorporated while aerodynamic drag and<br />
weight have been reduced. At the same time, lowspeed<br />
collision damage protection has been<br />
increased to I mph from the current 5 mph. Appearance<br />
is pleasing and cost, as determined by<br />
materials and production concerns, is kept low.<br />
The Minicars RSV project is accomplishing objectives<br />
similar to the Calspan RSV, but with a substantially<br />
different vehicle configuration (see<br />
Figure l0).<br />
The Minicars RSv engine./driveline is located in<br />
the rear, thereby providing opportunity to design<br />
20<br />
Figure 9. Experimental Headlamp Covers<br />
to lncrease Fuel EconomY<br />
Figure 10. New Minicar RSV Design<br />
the front-end energy management characteristic$<br />
to use the approximately 45 inches of available<br />
structural crush, to make 50-mph occupant protection<br />
feasible (Figure 11). The Minicars frontend<br />
also is designed to reduce pedestrian injuries<br />
up to approximately 25 mph, eliminate danger in<br />
rigid barrier crashes up to approximately l0 mph,<br />
restrict damage to a l6-inch, readily replaceable,<br />
bolt-on module in up to 20-mph barrier crashes,<br />
and impart nonaggressive, low-level crash load*<br />
ings to any other vehicle struck by the RSV.<br />
The Minicars Phase III also will refine the RSV<br />
design, after which construction of vehicles fbr<br />
Government evaluation in Phase IV is planned.<br />
The unique foam-filled, lightweight structure of<br />
the Minicars RSV is being utilized in the design<br />
and construction of a six-passenger car weighing<br />
less than 3,000 pounds. This car is being designed<br />
to give occupant crash survivability to at Ieast<br />
40-mph frontal barrier requirements. Fuel<br />
economy of at least 27.5 mpg in the combined<br />
EPA cycle, while satisfying statutory emission requirements,<br />
will be possible with the use of an<br />
advanced engine being developed by Volvo. The<br />
engine will be front wheel drive, with transverse<br />
engine configuration. The additional vehicle crush<br />
that is obtained will provide more protection for<br />
the restrained occupant. The vehicle styling, exterior<br />
dimension$, and passenger compartment size<br />
are those of the General Motors 1977 Chevrolet<br />
Impala. Side and transverse vehicle structures will
yn {@*iffNpryr,'H$v<br />
pHl$E I c0ilFlcunATt0tl<br />
STNATFIGO GHARSEO SO CU. N- Hffi<br />
WITH S.SPEEII<br />
ff<br />
iJl<br />
rufl tTmtff cEtr{'<br />
be improved, to insrease occupant protection<br />
from side impact. Preliminary guidance to rulemakers<br />
on achievable safety goals in light, sixpassenger<br />
integrated vehicles will result from these<br />
programs.<br />
Work is under way on the application of turbocharging<br />
to achieve higher performance from the<br />
1.6 liter (98 cubic inch) Honda engine without<br />
F.PA fuel economy degradation in the four-passenger<br />
RSV. An automatic five-speed transmission<br />
system, which eliminates need for a fluid torque<br />
converter with its associated fuel economy degradation,<br />
is under development for RSV application.<br />
This transmission with microprocessor control<br />
should improve fuel economy over that of the<br />
basic five-speed stick shift, by ensuring most<br />
efficient engine operation commensurate with<br />
driver-controlled acceleration and steadv srare<br />
speed demands.<br />
Volkswagen of Germany participates in the Integrated<br />
Vehicle Program by developing, under<br />
contract, a data base for lightweight automotive<br />
-ELA8T LIITIATED EITZIIE<br />
;#<br />
13 CU. FT. TUEAAEE YOLIJffi"'<br />
s0 wfl PAsswt oilYER tx0<br />
Pt8ffrEE8 HE8Tf,AnT8<br />
BACI( & PilflT<br />
A&E m8t StStH<br />
$fl.3 SrArE [AoAi<br />
ALPIIITffNffi D$PIAY t0 Ffi I0-DAHASI<br />
FNHfT HffiR<br />
FILTEO MOR S FoAt [{TEnnF PAooiltG<br />
Nll| FLAT BAIilAT<br />
F'I IIO.OATAGE f,EAR flTFEI<br />
I WI{EEI AiTt-toCX 0t8G EnAXES<br />
. WHEEL HOEFTIIIETT SUSPEH$Mil F0IFF|U.E0 tffiEr srEt ililfttttE<br />
Figure 11. RSV Phase ll Configuration<br />
diesel power plants suitable for use in the RSV's.<br />
Data on fuel economy, regulated and unregulated<br />
exhaust emissions, odor, noise, driveability, acceleration<br />
and other attributes of these engine and<br />
vehicle systems were provided. The engines were<br />
evaluated for compatibility with vehicles of advanced<br />
crashworthiness characteristics. A turbocharged<br />
diesel engine was installed in two vehicles,<br />
which were tested for performance, fuel economy,<br />
and emission by NHTSA and EPA. One model<br />
(Figures 12 and 13) was the Integrated Research<br />
VW (IRVW), originally developed by Volkswagen<br />
under the ESV Program as a gasoline-enginepowered<br />
safety vehicle. This vehicle achieved a<br />
frontal crashworthiness of 40 mph and a combined<br />
cycle fuel economy of about 60 mpg.<br />
Since NHTSA has regulatory responsibility in the<br />
area of fuel economy in addition to safety, it was<br />
necessary that consideration be given to the relationship<br />
between national goals in safety and<br />
energy conservation, as well as other economic<br />
and consumer interests, including environmental<br />
21
Figure 12. Section View ot VW RSV with Turbocharged Diesel Englne<br />
protection. Meeting these expanded goals required<br />
further effort in systems analysis. Integrated Vehicle<br />
Systems studies were used in support of the<br />
Federal Task Force on Motor Vehicle Goals<br />
Beyond 1980, whose findings were published in<br />
r976.<br />
Some of the trade-offs associated with regulation<br />
of the automobile can be illustrated by considering<br />
alternatives affecting fuel economy. The matrix<br />
shown in Table 7 illustrates the alternatives be'<br />
tween consumer choices, technology choices, and<br />
variations in safety and emissions (regulated).<br />
Other factors, such as cost, damageability, and<br />
marketing, also must be considered.<br />
For regulatory planning, it is necessary to assess<br />
the national cost, fuel consumption, lives and injuries<br />
saved, and other factors associated with<br />
advanced technology alternatives. The lntegrated<br />
Vehicle Systems hardware program can buttress<br />
the analytical trade-off studies. Each of the<br />
vehicles illustrated represents a data point which<br />
T2<br />
verifies or updates the predictions made in the<br />
motor vehicle goals study.<br />
The trade-offs made in connection with the program<br />
will yield an understanding of the interactions<br />
of safety, fuel economy, vehicle performance,<br />
and cost, and form an essential part of the<br />
data base for NHTSA standards.<br />
. r<br />
Figure 13. VWTurbocharged Diesel Engine<br />
Experimental Vehicle
Table 7. Alternatives Affecting Fuel Economy<br />
Consumer Choices Tech nology Alternatives Safety/Emissions Criterir<br />
INTERIOR<br />
VOLUME<br />
ACCEL. PERF<br />
O TO 60 MPH<br />
STRUCTURE ENGINE THANSMISSION SAFETY EMISSIONS<br />
3 CHOTCES 2 CHOTCES 3 CHOTCES4 CHOICES 2 CHOICES 3 CHOTCES3 CHOTCES<br />
CURRENT<br />
4<br />
PASStrNGtrF CUHRENT LEVEL I LEVEL I<br />
6<br />
PASSENGEF<br />
15 SEC TOP'75 CURRENT<br />
WEIGHT<br />
coNSCtOltS<br />
20 SEC DIESEL UPGRADED<br />
LEVEL II LEVEL II<br />
6<br />
PASSENGEF INNOVATIVE LEVEL III LEVEL III<br />
ADVANCED<br />
ENGINE: CUHRENT-AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY PEFFORMANCE FOR 1975 FLEET<br />
TOP'7s_BEST FUEL ECONOMY PERFORMANCE<br />
FOR 197S FLEET<br />
TRANSMISSION: CURRENT-3€PEED AUTOMATIC<br />
UPGRADE_TORQUE CONVERTER, 4-SPEED LOCK.UP<br />
$THUCTURE: GURRENT-AVERAGE'75<br />
WEIGHT CONSCIOUS-FIRST STEP IN SIGNIFICANT WEIGHI REDUCfION WITHOUT SACHIFICING INTERIOR<br />
SPACE<br />
INNOVATIVE_SECOND STEP IN WEIGHT NEDUCTION UTILIZING 10% TO 15% PLASTIC/ALUMINUM SUBSTITU-<br />
TION<br />
SAFETY: LEVEL Ii 30 MPH FRONTr'.-<br />
LEVEL ll: 40 MPH FBONTAL;20 MPH S|DE<br />
LEVEL lll: 50 MPH FRONTA-<br />
EMISSIONS:<br />
LEVEL l: 1.5-HG/15.0-CO/3.1-NO" (gnr/mi)<br />
LEVEL ll: .41 HC/3.4-CO/2.0 NO* (gm/ml)<br />
LEVEL lll: .41 HC/3.4CO/0.4-NO, (gm/mi)
CHAPTER 5<br />
CRASH AVOIDANCE<br />
Vehicle Handling<br />
Vehicle handling research investigates the complex<br />
relationship between driver and machine. Driver<br />
research includes consideration of the driver's<br />
physical limitations, experience, and tasks encountered.<br />
Vehicle research evaluates the response of<br />
the machine to the demands of the driver and to<br />
environmental conditions such as rough roads or<br />
winds.<br />
To study vehicle response to cross winds and bow<br />
winds created by passing vehicles, a sophisticated<br />
wind machine has been designed and is being fabricated.<br />
This machine is composed of eight modular<br />
wind generators which, by physical placement,<br />
are capable of simulating many kinds of wind<br />
disturbances. The wind generators (Figure 14) are<br />
portable for varying field set-ups and are highway<br />
transportable. Design validation will be accomplished<br />
by using wind tunnels as calibration standards<br />
and by conducting full-scale vehicle tests. The<br />
Flgure 14. Portable Wind Generator<br />
effects of aerodynamic disturbances on vehicle<br />
design and vehicle handling will be determined.<br />
Another portable facility under construction will<br />
measure dynamic properties, such as moments of<br />
inertia of vehicles weighing up to 10,000 pounds.<br />
These data are essential for accurate mathematical<br />
simulations, and will support other research<br />
activities.<br />
A passenger car-trailer study (Figure l5), completed<br />
in 1977, worked out methods which enable<br />
trailer owners to optimiee load-equalization hitch<br />
settings. A previous phase had found that manufacturers'<br />
recommended settings were not the<br />
best, and could result in instability at relatively<br />
low speeds. In general, poor load-equalization can<br />
cause inferior braking performance, overloaded<br />
tires, and poorly aimed headlights.<br />
Research on large articulated vehicles continues.<br />
Frame torsional stiffness (which is insignificant in<br />
the case of passenger cars) is important in large<br />
vehicles because high centers of gravity and heavy<br />
loads impose extreme stresses that affect tire loadings<br />
and stability. Computer simulation, as well as<br />
full-scale vehicle testing, is used to measure these<br />
effects and to develop modifications for improved<br />
yaw and rollover stability. Physical parameters<br />
affected include frame stiffness, location and free<br />
play of fifth-wheel axle loading, and front and<br />
rear roll stiffness. Two tractor-trailer combination<br />
vehicles will be modified, fully instrurnented, and<br />
tested, to verify design and simulation results.<br />
While passenger cars and large vehicles receive<br />
most attention, the handling and stability of<br />
motorcycles cannot be overlooked (Figure 16).<br />
Test procedures suitable for handling and stability<br />
rulemaking are near completion, and progress has<br />
25
Flgure 15. Car.Traller Combination lllustratingFavorable<br />
Load Equallzation<br />
been made in the development of a low-eost antilock<br />
brake system for motorcycles. A wheel-speed<br />
sensor has been fabricated and has undergone<br />
extensive analysis.<br />
Tires and Wheels<br />
Three manufacturers of tire retreading equipment<br />
have undertaken the design and fabrication of an<br />
automatic, non-destructive, test system fbr tire<br />
casings which should be on the market in 1978.<br />
The design is based on the transmission of ultrasonics<br />
throueh the tire casing, a system developed<br />
by NHTSA. The equipment will give the industry<br />
a low-cost method for selecting only sound casings<br />
for retread, to the benefit of the public in quality<br />
and safety.<br />
Final validation of the reflection ultrasonic system<br />
for evaluating new tires continues (Figure l7). ln<br />
addition to its versatility in compliance testing,<br />
research and development, and quality control,<br />
the system has the capability of locating overbuff<br />
in retread tires. Refinement of the current design<br />
will result in a cost-beneficial system for compliance<br />
testing new and retread tires.<br />
A tire casing bead tester designed by NHTSA is<br />
being tested. The system can be retrofitted to existing<br />
visual tire inspecting units in the retread industry<br />
(Figure l8), to detect faulty beads in casings<br />
being processed for retread. It will identify kinks,<br />
26<br />
',' ,..r)i,il<br />
r,<br />
' -*i* ,", ,,,,<br />
broken wire, and beads not normally found by<br />
existing inspection techniques. The design will be<br />
made available to all interested parties in the retread<br />
industry.<br />
An accelerated tire treadwear test technique also is<br />
being assessed. This method would permit tire<br />
treadwear grading to be accomplished in less than<br />
50 miles, without the use of a special course or<br />
control tire. Results of lull treadwear testing in<br />
Nevada, Connecticut, and Texas will be correlated<br />
with the respective accelerated treadwear test<br />
results.<br />
Figure 16. Motorcycle Equipped<br />
with<br />
Experimental Salety Devlces
'ffi,<br />
I<br />
t I<br />
Flgure17.<br />
Ultrasonic Tlrc Testing System<br />
Figure 18. Tire Casing Bead Tester<br />
The final Uniform Tire Quality Gracling (UTeC)<br />
regulation, challenged by eight domestic tire manufacturers,<br />
was upheld by the United States Court<br />
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On March ?1.<br />
{<br />
1977, the Supreme court denied the petition of the<br />
manufacturers to review the lower court's decision.<br />
FMVSS No. 109 was amended to permit manufacture<br />
of a new series of tires having load ratings and<br />
inflation pressures expressed in metric units and a<br />
newly designed tire having a maximum inflation<br />
pressure of 60 psi. The change to metric units is in<br />
consonance with a world-wide standardization<br />
process. The 60 psi tires are substitutes for con_<br />
ventional spare tires, designed to reduce overall<br />
weight and increase storage space in passenger car<br />
trunks.<br />
Brakes<br />
The NHTSA Safety Research Laboratory (SRL)<br />
initiated a test program to evaluate operational<br />
problems with heavy-duty combination vehicles<br />
when pre-FMVSS No. 12l, and FMVSS No. lll<br />
braking systems are interrnixed (Figure l9). The<br />
SRL test program includes three basic kinds of<br />
combination vehicles: tractor with trailer, tracror<br />
with double rrailer, and truck with full trailer. Over<br />
3,000 test runs in accident avoidance maneuvers<br />
under various conditions of loading and road surfaces<br />
have been completed. Preliminary findings<br />
indicate that compatibility problems do not exist<br />
in accident avoidance maneuvers and that the use<br />
of a FMVSS No. 121 braking system on any axle<br />
in the combination actually improves performance.<br />
Further testing in 1978 will evaluate compatibility<br />
problems that mighr exist in mountain<br />
descent operations.<br />
Research continue$ to establish the braking performance<br />
capability of hydraulically braked passenger<br />
cars on low and split-coefficient surfaces,<br />
for both straight and curved path braking. preliminary<br />
data analysis indicates that there is no<br />
significant difference in stopping performance<br />
between straight-line and curved-path braking, for<br />
vehicles which comply with FMVSS No. 105-75. A<br />
vehicle's braking performance on high-coefficient<br />
(dry) surfaces is not necessarily related to its stopping<br />
ability on low-coefficient (wet) surfaces. For<br />
this reason, additional testing on low-coefficient<br />
surfaces, for possible inclusion in FMVSS No.<br />
105-75, is planned. Tests of an advanced concept,<br />
antiJock equipped vehicle showed that braking in<br />
a turn on split-coefficient surfaces may be used to<br />
establish better performance requirements for<br />
braking systems.<br />
n
f*#<br />
'"'i -'-,<br />
I<br />
,l.<br />
"'?.f..., ".s" 1,,;/|'ffi<br />
,r,fr*""; . " t' ;'] ''r,:,<br />
Figure 19. Testlng Safety Problems Due to Intermixed Braking Systems<br />
During 1977, two engineering models of a selfcontained<br />
radar system were designed and fabricated.<br />
One model was installed in a passenger car<br />
equipped with an hydraulic-boo$t brake system,<br />
and the other in a car with a vacuum-boosted<br />
brake system. Limited test result$ were encourag'<br />
ing with respect to stopping distances, and in the<br />
fact that the radar systems of on-coming vehicles<br />
did not cancel out one another.<br />
The Driver nnd the Yehicle<br />
The interaction between the driver and his vehicle<br />
consists of three major areas, all of which play important<br />
roles in traffic safety.<br />
l. Lishtins- Vehicle lighting and signaling<br />
systems are important for adequate seeing<br />
distance at nighttime and for inter-vehicle<br />
communication during all types of driving<br />
conditions. During 1977, NHTSA received<br />
15 petitions to amend FMVSS No. 108 to upgrade<br />
headlamp candlepower, revise motorcycle<br />
headlight requirements, and make<br />
other changes to lighting and signaling systems.<br />
ln addition. NHTSA continued a<br />
W<br />
research and testing program to support<br />
future revisions to Standard No. 108. Major<br />
topics of investigations were (l) hiehmounted<br />
rear stop and turn signals, (2) various<br />
deceleration signals, (3) vehicle foe lieht<br />
systems, (4) signal liehtine needs for emergency<br />
vehicles, school buses, and service<br />
vehicles, (5) methods to aid in motorcycle<br />
visibility, and (6) a single beam headlamp<br />
system. Of particular interest were the results<br />
of a field evaluation which found that cars<br />
equipped with a supplemental center, highmounted<br />
brake lieht had over 50 percent<br />
fewer rear-end accidents than cars with conventional<br />
rear-end lights.<br />
NHTSA has initiated research on electrical<br />
system integrity and electromagnetic interference.<br />
As part of this effort, NHTSA is<br />
working with the Consumer Froducts Safety<br />
Commission on the problem of exploding<br />
car batteries and the need for a safetv standard.<br />
2. Visibility- Driver visibility standards include<br />
FMVSS No. 103 on defrosting and<br />
defogging, No. 104 on windshield wiping
and washing, No. 107 on sunlight glare reduction,<br />
and No. I I I on rearview mirror<br />
systems. NHTSA is developing a regulation<br />
on "Fields of Direct View" and investigating<br />
the problem of vehicle splash and spray.<br />
Research and testing programs underway include<br />
(l) peripheral vision and driving performance,<br />
(2) glare in rearview mirrors from<br />
various types of headlamps, (3) a method to<br />
determine the effects of vehicle obstructions<br />
and mirror placement upon driver performance,<br />
(4) truck plane and convex mirror systems,<br />
involving field tests to evaluate driver<br />
performance, (5) a defogging test for evaluating<br />
the merits of school bus defogging<br />
systems, (6) road load vs. engine idle speed<br />
methods for testing passenger car defrosting<br />
systems, (7) light truck windshield defrosting<br />
systems, (8) a new road film solution for<br />
testing windshield washing system$, (9) a test<br />
to evaluate windshield clearing effectiveness,<br />
and (10) a headlamp washer test mixture and<br />
procedure. ln addition, NHTSA staff supports<br />
a FHWA program concerned with<br />
large truck splash, spray, and aerodynamic<br />
effects.<br />
3.<br />
Controls and Displays-Controls and displays<br />
are the means of communication between<br />
the driver and his vehicle for monitoring<br />
vehicle condition and operation. Any<br />
degradation or failure of the equipment<br />
poses a risk to safe operation. Recognition<br />
became easier through standardization of<br />
certain controls and displays in an amendment<br />
to FMVSS No. l0l.<br />
Work on a new $tandard that would regulate<br />
the speedometer and odometer was completed.<br />
Speedometer readings would be limited<br />
to 85 mph, and anti-tampering features<br />
of the odometer would be improved.
CHAPTER<br />
6<br />
STAN DARDS ENFORCEMENT AND<br />
DEFECTS INVESTIGATION<br />
Standards Enforcement Background<br />
The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety<br />
Act of 1966 ("the Act") places the responsibility<br />
for certification of motor vehicles or motor vehicle<br />
equipment on the manufacturcr or distributor.<br />
Any standard or regulation having the force of<br />
law must be backed up by enforcement in order to<br />
ensure compliance. NHTSA is authorized to conduct<br />
a testing program and inspections to enforce<br />
the motor vehicle standards.<br />
The purpose of standards enforcement is to establish<br />
a level of surveillance that will encourage<br />
manufacturers to exercise diligence in their quality<br />
control and manufacturing processes, thereby ensuring<br />
compliance. Each year all applicable standards<br />
are evaluated and priorities established for<br />
compliance testing. Among the things considered<br />
are the possible consequences of a failure, previous<br />
test experience, accident data, similarity of<br />
vehicles, consumer complaints, market penetration,<br />
and new vehicle design.<br />
Investigations are opened as a result of compliance<br />
test failure, visual inspection, consumer<br />
complaints, analysis of manufacturing data, congressional<br />
inquiries, and exarnination of manufacturers'<br />
voluntary recall campaigns relating to the<br />
standards.<br />
The Record<br />
During the past l0 years of compliance testing,<br />
2,511 investigations have been opened as a result<br />
of test failures and suspected noncompliance.<br />
Eighty-two percent of these investigations have<br />
been cornpleted, 423 investigation.s are still in<br />
process. During the past year, 303 investigations<br />
were initiated and 281 investigations were closed.<br />
Each month NHTSA issues a computerized<br />
'*Monthly<br />
Compliance Report." This practice has<br />
been in effect for over 7 years. The report provides<br />
consunrers as well as manufacturers with an account<br />
of NHTSA enforcement activities. A summary<br />
includes reports accepted, investigations initiated,<br />
investigations in progress, investigations<br />
closed, investigations released to the public, and<br />
also identifies the number of enforcement actions<br />
underway.<br />
Testing for compliance is done by independent<br />
testing laboratories under contract to NHTSA.<br />
Test results do not rcllect NHTSA's position on<br />
compliance. Favorable results should not be interpreted<br />
as necessarily establishing that the vehicle<br />
or item of equipment, a$ a class, is in conformity<br />
with the relevant FMVSS. Similarly, unfavorable<br />
test results should not be interpreted as having<br />
established nonconformances with FMVSS.<br />
Responsive tests, by definition, are those which<br />
are not part of the regular scheduled test program.<br />
During the past year these were included in the<br />
Report. They consist of accumulation of special<br />
tests responsive to consumer complaints, retests of<br />
items that have failed in the scheduled program,<br />
and tests of vehicle or equipment items which may<br />
be introduced late in a model year. Responsive<br />
testing related to FMVSS No. 109, Pneumatic<br />
Tnties, has been the largest testing category during<br />
the past two years.<br />
ln 1977,7,458 pieces of equipment were tested,<br />
and 172 vehicles were subjected to 225 tests.<br />
The testing program recognizes the continuing<br />
change in design characteristics of vehicles, as<br />
3t
Investigations<br />
Opened<br />
Closed<br />
Accumulated Total of<br />
Inve$tigations<br />
Opened<br />
Closed<br />
Table 8. Summary of Investlgatlons 1969-1977<br />
(Calendar Year)<br />
69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77<br />
149<br />
89<br />
149<br />
8S<br />
224<br />
69<br />
373<br />
158<br />
M2<br />
365<br />
815<br />
523<br />
337<br />
269<br />
1192<br />
792<br />
271<br />
229<br />
1463<br />
1061<br />
310<br />
331<br />
1773<br />
1352<br />
142<br />
310<br />
1S15<br />
1662<br />
Table 9. Number ol Civil Peneltles and Dollar Amounts<br />
(1968-1976)<br />
293<br />
209<br />
2208<br />
1871<br />
303<br />
281<br />
2511<br />
2152<br />
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77<br />
Civil Penalties 0 3 7 15 26 47 45 21 20 14<br />
Dollars Ohousands) 0 90 124 194 176 193 230 138 94 17<br />
manufacturers strive to meet national priorities in<br />
the conservation of energy. Recognition is given to<br />
the fact that completely changed models currently<br />
being brought to market represent the manufacturers'<br />
efforts to reduce both size and weight. Test<br />
schedules are adjusted to include higher percentages<br />
of the totally new offerings to ascertain that<br />
they meet the requirements of the FMVSS (Figure<br />
20). During 1977 there was an increase in the number<br />
of test program vehicles that incorporated new<br />
structural design modifications such as shorter<br />
wheelbase, less overhang front and rear, lighter<br />
weight, more glass; interior design changes, and<br />
downgrading of power plants. It is expected that<br />
such changes will continue future model<br />
years.<br />
Upon test completion, vehicles are repaired and<br />
sold, traded in on new vehicles. donated to vocational<br />
trade schools, or transferred to other programs<br />
within the department. Vehicles subjected<br />
to the barrier crash or other destructive tests are<br />
sold for salvage. Funds from vehicle sales supplement<br />
test program expenditures.<br />
Uniform Tire Qunlity Grading<br />
Operations at the Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />
Test Center in San Angelo, Texas increased, both<br />
32<br />
in treadwear and in traction tests, Course monitoring<br />
tires (CMT's) of all three construction types<br />
(radial, bias, and bias belted) were released to the<br />
tire industry; this brought about greatly increased<br />
industry use of the test center.<br />
The CMT's were sold to ten tire manufacturers<br />
and four testing firms. During 1977, tests conducted<br />
on the San Angelo course by seven domestic<br />
tire firms, two foreign tire firms, and one testing<br />
company, involved some 224 test cars. ln addition,<br />
six companies have conducted traction tests<br />
on the concrete and asphalt skid surface, for a<br />
total of l2l test davs.<br />
Figure 20. Testing Program to Determine<br />
Crash Survivability
Course monitoring tests continued on the treadwear<br />
course. Monitoring tests on the traction<br />
surfaces used the NHTSA skid test system to ensure<br />
that the traction coefficient skid numbers remained<br />
within the prescribed limits for industry<br />
testing.<br />
The UTQG data management system at San<br />
Angelo now transmits treadwear and traction data<br />
to Wa$hington for comprehensive analysis.<br />
Surveillance of Imported Nonconforming<br />
Motor Vehicles<br />
The number of nonconforming foreign motor<br />
vehicles imported into the United States increased<br />
approximately l0 percent in 1977, as compared to<br />
1976, and resulted in a similar gain in preliminary<br />
investigations.<br />
During the year, there was increased refinement<br />
and utilization of the computerized system set up<br />
for initial processing, and continued monitoring,<br />
of cases established by preliminary investigation.<br />
This permitted a speedup in the disposition of<br />
cases through earlier recommendations to the<br />
Customs officials.<br />
Surveillance of commercial importers of nonconforming<br />
motor vehicles for resale continues. Technical<br />
personnel assigned to the NHTSA regional<br />
offices perform approximately 97 percent of the<br />
on-site inspections to verify that noncontbrming<br />
vehicles have been modified as stated in the importer's<br />
compliance statements. Over 50 percent<br />
of the vehicles tested have failed to meet one or<br />
more FMVSS.<br />
As a result of failure to conform, NHTSA recommended<br />
assessment of liquidated damages in over<br />
200 cases in 1977 , under the terms of the Customs<br />
entry declaration.<br />
There has been a sharp growth in the importation<br />
of small motor-driven two-wheeled vehicles, commonly<br />
called "mopeds" (Figure 2l). Over 80 foreign<br />
manufacturers are manufacturing these vehicles,<br />
and a large number are shipping them to the<br />
United States. Without exception, early production<br />
moped vehicles inspected from each new<br />
manufacturer have failed to conform to all of the<br />
applicable standards. Additionally, consumer information<br />
for these vehicles was either nonexistent<br />
or incorrect, and certification was<br />
improper.<br />
Defects Investigrtion Background<br />
The major objective of defects investigation is to<br />
influence vehicle and vehicle equipment manufacturers<br />
to build products increasingly free of safetyrelated<br />
defects, through enforcernent of Sections<br />
15l-160 of the Act.<br />
Nevertheless, motor vehicles and motor vehicle<br />
equipment are produced with safety-related<br />
defects. In those cases where the manufacturer reports<br />
such defects voluntarily, the recall procedures<br />
and corrective actions must be monitored.<br />
In cases where defects are reported by the public,<br />
Figure 21. Mopeds-A New Traffic<br />
Safety Problem<br />
33
NHTSA investigations are required to determine<br />
whether such defects are saf'ety-related.<br />
Congress recognized when passing the Act that it<br />
would be impractical to issue standards for all<br />
vehicle components that could cause accident$,<br />
deaths, or injuries if they failed. Therefore, safety<br />
defect investigations were authorized, and the<br />
manufacturer's responsibility to notiiy owners in<br />
the event a defect was determined to exist was<br />
clearly outlined. The Act also increases manuf'acturers'<br />
awareness of their responsibilities, and<br />
focuses public attention on safety-related defects.<br />
How the Job is Done<br />
To detect trends, information is analyzed from a<br />
variety of sources including vehicle owner letters,<br />
accident reports, consumer groups, manufacturer<br />
service bulletins, and research reports. If a trend<br />
develops, investigations are initiated to determine<br />
whether defects do or do not exist, through testing,<br />
field investigations, and surveys.<br />
Independent investigations are undertaken by<br />
NHTSA to identify safety defects unknown to, or<br />
overlooked by, vehicle and vehicle equipment<br />
manufacturers. Enforcement action is recommended<br />
when the manufacturer fails to take<br />
appropriate action on a safety defect problem. Investigations<br />
must develop the documented evidence<br />
for the expert testimony required in the<br />
event of enforcement litigation.<br />
Manufacturer service bulletins are analyzed and<br />
discussed with manufacturers to be sure that<br />
defects are not overlooked or classified as nonsaf'ety<br />
defects. The proposed cprrective action is<br />
analyzed to make sure it is adequate. Follow-up<br />
action is taken to ensure that the manufacturer's<br />
corrective action is implemented by the dealers.<br />
To enhance its capabilities in identifying and<br />
evaluating safety-related defects, NHTSA has:<br />
r Made permanent a nation-wide Auto Safety<br />
Hotline.<br />
r Disseminated the Hotline story to members<br />
of the Congress, the media, auto clubs, and others<br />
who are in contact with the motoring public.<br />
. Expanded its surveillance program covering<br />
manufacturers' warranty data, service bulletins,<br />
and recall campaigns.<br />
. Expanded the number of engineering evaluations<br />
from 32 in 1976 to 96 in 1977.<br />
34<br />
r Increased the number and scope of in-house<br />
tests.<br />
To ensure public awareness and encourage participation<br />
in the investigative process, public<br />
announcements are made coincident with the<br />
opening of each investigation. The manufacturer,<br />
the media, and consumer interest groups are inf<br />
ormed of the investigation, and are asked to add<br />
to the factual data bearing on the subject. A Consumer<br />
Protection tsulletin or Public Advisory is<br />
issued when an immediate risk to traffic safety<br />
becoures apparent.<br />
NHTSA utilizes contractor and automobile club<br />
resources in obtaining investigatory facts and statistics;<br />
this expands the data base and speeds up<br />
determinations of the existence of safety-related<br />
defects.<br />
NHTSA now receives about 36,000 reports a year<br />
from consumers. They are NHTSA's principal<br />
source of information. Each report is reviewed<br />
and made part of an automated consumer file.<br />
The data information system also is programmed<br />
with information concerning manufacturers' service<br />
bulletins, recall campaigns, previous investigations,<br />
and problems.<br />
The Hotline, in addition to opening a direct line of<br />
communication between the consumer and NHTSA,<br />
provides a means ol acquiring timely information<br />
relating to ongoing investigations and other safetyrelated<br />
vehicle problems. In its first year of operation.<br />
the Hotline received over 15.000 calls from<br />
the public (Figure 22). There werc requests for<br />
Figure 22. NHTSA Deputy Admlnlstrator<br />
Works Hie Shilt on the Hotline
information concerning DOT, NHTSA, vehicle<br />
standards, and the rulemaking process. Of greatest<br />
importance to the investigatory activity, nearly<br />
7,000 calls were received from consumers reporting<br />
vehicle safety problems.<br />
The number of Hotline calls averages 200 to 300<br />
per day. When a major recall is announced or<br />
when news of a new investigation is released, 500<br />
to 6O0 consumer calls will be received in a day.<br />
Information obtained from the Hotline calls that<br />
pertains to safety-related defects is entered into<br />
the data information file.<br />
NHTSA and the Recall Campaigns<br />
"Recall<br />
campaign" is the term given to action<br />
generally taken under the notification and remedy<br />
section of the Act concerning safety-related<br />
defects and noncompliance. Recall campaigns initiated<br />
by manufacturers, either voluntarily or by<br />
direction of NHTSA or the courts, are preceded<br />
by some form of investigation. An investigation<br />
may be undertaken by the manufacturer, or by<br />
NHTSA or, in some cases, by both.<br />
When a manufacturer determines that a defect<br />
that relates to motor vehicle safety or noncornpliance<br />
exists in a group of vehicles or items of equipment,<br />
the manufacturer is required to notify the<br />
vehicle owner, dealers, distributors, and NHTSA.<br />
Also, the manufacturer is required to remedy the<br />
problem at no charge to the vehicle owner.<br />
NHTSA is responsible for monitoring the manufacturer's<br />
corrective action for adequacy, and for<br />
compliance with statutory requirements.<br />
Reports that suggest the existence of significant<br />
safety defects in groups ofvehicles are investigated<br />
whether or not the component is the subject of a<br />
Federal Standard. Investigations encompass the<br />
production process from design, material, and<br />
manufacturing to quality control.<br />
If NHTSA's initial determination is that there is a<br />
safety defect or noncompliance, a letter is written<br />
to the manufacturer, informing him and stating<br />
the basis for the conclusions, and a notice is<br />
published in the Federal Register. The letter and<br />
notice give the time and place when a public meeting<br />
will be held so that the manufacturer and other<br />
interested parties may present their views. Statements<br />
made at this public proceeding are recorded.<br />
The information is then presented to the Administrator<br />
for final determination. lf there is an<br />
affirmative finding, a final letter is written to the<br />
manufacturer requiring that he notify all known<br />
owners, dealers, and distributors. Should the<br />
manufacturer refuse, the Administrator can go to<br />
the courts to compel him to take this action.<br />
The 1974 amendments to the Act give a vehicle<br />
owner the right to petition NHTSA for a public<br />
hearing, if a manufacturer has not corrected a<br />
safety problem without charge and within a reasonable<br />
time. Vehicle owner$ may also petition if<br />
they believe their Vehicles contain defects. The<br />
manufacturer must include information regarding<br />
complaint procedures and petitions in his recall<br />
letters to owners.<br />
Three of five petitions regarding recall campaign<br />
performance received by NHTSA during 1977<br />
have been resolved without resorting to hearing<br />
procedures. All campaign performance petitions<br />
have received responses within the 60-day period<br />
established by regulation.<br />
Thirteen petitions were received during 1977 from<br />
owners who believed their cars contained defects<br />
which also existed in a large number of similar<br />
vehicles. Of this group, one resulted in a defect<br />
notification campaign and another formed the<br />
basis for a formal defects investigation. To date,<br />
all responses have been made within the 120-day<br />
period established by statute.<br />
Publications concerning recall campaigns are<br />
available to the general public in several forms. A<br />
summary of each campaign is made public soon<br />
after it is received in NHTSA.<br />
A quarterly booklet summarizing the campaigns<br />
received each calendar quarter is printed and distributed<br />
by the Covernment Printing Office<br />
(CPO).'" Details for each campaign are available<br />
for reference in the Technical Reference Branch,<br />
NHTSA.<br />
In order to respond more quickly to the consum€r,<br />
and to provide more rapid turnaround for petitions<br />
and suggested investigations, NHTSA is acquiring<br />
a laboratory to perform metallurgical<br />
analyses of failed materials. This facility will aid<br />
in determining, upon receipt, whether or not a<br />
component or system contributes to safety-related<br />
defects. Equipment is also being acquired to permit<br />
chemical analyses of failed parts.<br />
{See Appendix D, No, 46.
As the year began, there were 49 cases being actively<br />
investigated. During the course of the year,<br />
25 new cases were opened and investigative action<br />
was completed on 54, leaving 20 cases under active<br />
investigation. Of these, l2 have been open for less<br />
than six months.<br />
Two important 197? cases were:<br />
r Engine Comparlment Fire: The recall of<br />
Porsches resulted from the discovery by a Safety<br />
Defects Investigator that dilute acid washed from<br />
the vehicle battery caused deterioration of the<br />
fabric wrapped around nearby fuel hoses. This<br />
resulted in loosening of the hoses, leakage of fuel<br />
and, finally, engine compartment fires. Following<br />
a NHTSA demonstration, the vehicle manufacturer<br />
announced a safety defect recall.<br />
t Flexibte Fan Breakage.' The Parts Return<br />
Program disclosed several broken flex fansn<br />
together with reports of cut hoses, fan shrouds,<br />
and radiators, but with no report$ of accidents or<br />
injuries. However, in January, word was received<br />
that a mechanic had received a cut arm from a<br />
broken blade. When inquiry to the vehicle manufacturer<br />
disclosed additional injuries, a formal investigation<br />
was opened and an NHTSA Consumer<br />
Advisory warned of the dangers involved in servicing<br />
engines equipped with flexible fans (Figure 23).<br />
The scope of the investigation was broadened to<br />
include other domestic manufacturers. A concerted<br />
effort resulted in the announcement of two<br />
defect notifications from Ford and one from<br />
American Motors Corporation.<br />
Safety Defect Recrlls-1977<br />
In 1977, there were 246 safety defect recall campaigns<br />
by vehicle manufacturers, involving a<br />
record 12.9 million (M) vehicles. Of these, 9.0M<br />
vehicles were recalled in campaigns influenced by<br />
NHTSA. Since inception of the Act (September<br />
1966 through December 1977) some 65.5M vehicles<br />
have been recalled in 2,396 campaigns; 10.4M<br />
vehicles and 451 campaigns involved foreign vehicles.<br />
Of these campaigns, 363, involving 34.4M<br />
vehicles, were influenced by NHTSA.<br />
Safety Cnmpaign Audits<br />
Part of the intent of the Act is to ensure that<br />
manufacturers produce vehicles and equipment as<br />
36<br />
free of defects as is technologically possible. When<br />
safety problems do occur, it is necessary to make<br />
sure that the manufacturers notify both NHTSA<br />
and the vehicle owner. However, the success of<br />
any recall campaign lies in the adequacy of corrective<br />
measures, and the extent to which the vehicle<br />
population is covered.<br />
Points considered by NHTSA in evaluating adequacy<br />
of a campaign<br />
are:<br />
r Does the corrective action eliminate the safety<br />
problem?<br />
r Is the timing as to the availability of replacement<br />
parts reasonable?<br />
r Does the letter to the owner realistically<br />
describe the saf'ety problem and the corrective<br />
action?<br />
r ls the recall campaign broad enough to encompass<br />
all potentially defective vehicles?<br />
r Are any other manufacturers using the same<br />
component with the same safety problem?<br />
NHTSA receives a copy of the letter which the<br />
manufacturer sends to the owners, Contents of the<br />
letter are prescribed by regulation.<br />
NHTSA has a follow-up program to ensufe that as<br />
many vehicles as possible are corrected. Each<br />
manufacturer is required to submit a quarterly<br />
report on campaign progress. When the completion<br />
rate is less than normal. the manufacturer<br />
may be requested to take additional action.
Teble 10. $ummary of Salety Recall Campaigns<br />
Defect Campaigns<br />
Vehicles Hecalled<br />
ffhousands)<br />
Year Dome$tic Foreign Domestic Foreign<br />
1969<br />
1970<br />
1971<br />
1972<br />
1973<br />
1974<br />
1975<br />
1976<br />
1977<br />
138<br />
100<br />
182<br />
277<br />
208<br />
208<br />
190<br />
169<br />
195<br />
42<br />
54<br />
53<br />
43<br />
43<br />
39<br />
27<br />
40<br />
51<br />
7,502<br />
738<br />
8,790<br />
7,814<br />
6,667<br />
2,338<br />
1,931<br />
2,944<br />
10,690<br />
The NHTSA audit progam is designed to ensure<br />
that vehicles having possible safety problems are<br />
identified and repaired, and to test the adequacy<br />
of the repairs. This is done on a sampling basis<br />
through contact with vehicle owners to establish<br />
whether:<br />
r A notification was received.<br />
r The owner responded.<br />
r The vehicle was repaired.<br />
As an extension of the audit, certain vehicles are<br />
examined to establish thatr<br />
r The repairs were made as claimed.<br />
r The repairs were adequate and effective'<br />
Parts Return Program<br />
The Parts Return Frogram involves voluntary<br />
submittal of information by independent repair<br />
shops, along with any failed automotive components<br />
encountered during daily business. The purpose<br />
of the program is to help NHTSA identify<br />
potential safety defects in motor vehicles and<br />
motor vehicle equipment (Figure 24).<br />
During the 1977 calendar year, 249 participating<br />
shops provided 1,4O8 components and items of information,<br />
a 49 percent increase from the previous<br />
year.<br />
The components and information received during<br />
this sixth year of program operation provided support<br />
to 17 formal investigations and to numerous<br />
engineering analyses. Two of the investigations<br />
resulted in the recall of certain failure-prone flexible<br />
blade engine cooling fans made by Ford<br />
416<br />
502<br />
630<br />
4,263<br />
334<br />
531<br />
280<br />
451<br />
2,227<br />
Safety Recall Campaigns<br />
Directly Influenced<br />
by NHTSA (Accumulative<br />
Percentage Since 1966)<br />
4.4<br />
5.3<br />
9.7<br />
14.9<br />
14.3<br />
14.9<br />
14.3<br />
14.4<br />
15.1<br />
Motor Company, and some Firestone steel belted<br />
tires which failed to comply with FMVSS No. 109.<br />
The program is being expanded to include new car<br />
dealers, automotive parts supplier$, and passenger<br />
vehicle fleet operators. This will broaden the base<br />
of parts and information to include late model<br />
vehicles.<br />
:' Recrefltional Yehicle Surveys<br />
Two NHTSA surveys of recreational vehicles, four<br />
years apart, were carried out to obtain data on
loading and suspensions. As a result of the overloaded<br />
conditions revealed in the original survey,<br />
two regulations and one FMVSS have been issued,<br />
These require manufacturers to provide users with<br />
information on loading, gross weight, and center<br />
of gravity.<br />
The second roadside survey showed a 26 percent<br />
decline in travel trailers found overloaded, and a<br />
35 percent decline in overloaded motor homes.<br />
Engineering Test Facility<br />
1977 was the startup year for the Engineering Test<br />
Facility located at the Transportation Research<br />
Center of Ohio. Testing began in September 1976.<br />
Leased building space of 32,500 square feet (Figure<br />
25) was occupied in December 1976. By May<br />
1977, four testing projects had been completed<br />
Flgure 25. Engin€ering Test Facility<br />
and the workload increased rapidly. By the end of<br />
the year, 24 projects had been received and 16 had<br />
been completed.<br />
The operation at ETF has confirmed the benefits<br />
of quick-reaction testing by an in-house facility.<br />
Testing in 1977 made use of the major driving surfaces<br />
available at the TRC-the 7.5 mile, highspeed<br />
oval track, the SO-acre vehicle dynamics<br />
area, and the 2,500-foot skid pad. ETF test projects<br />
also utilized the TRC high-acceleration crash<br />
simulator.<br />
Most of the testing performed by ETF during 1977<br />
was in support of NHTSA safety defect investigations.<br />
The purpose of one test project completed<br />
during 1977, however, was to validate a proposed<br />
new test procedure for Standard No. 213, Child<br />
Restraint Sy.rlerns. As future schedules permit,<br />
ETF will carry oul some compliance testing.
CHAPTER 7<br />
AUTOMOTIVE FUEL ECONOMY<br />
Sumnrary of Funclions and<br />
Interagency Relations<br />
The Secretary of Transportation is charged with<br />
the administration of Title V: Improving Automotive<br />
Efficiency of the Motor Vehicle lnformation<br />
and Cost Savings Act, as amended by the Energy<br />
Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. This responsibility<br />
has been delegated to NHTSA. The<br />
obligations include:<br />
r Promulgation of average passenger automobile<br />
fuel economy standards along the guidelines<br />
established by the Congress in the Act.<br />
r Establishment of average fuel economy<br />
standards for vans and light trucks under 10,000<br />
pounds GVWR.<br />
. Issuance of regulations governing proctdures,<br />
definitions, and rcports to sufrport the<br />
standards.<br />
r Enforcement of the standards.<br />
Proposed and final rules for automotive fuel<br />
economy, directed by the Secretary of Transportation,<br />
are coordinated with the Department of<br />
Energy. In addition such rulemaking is coordinated<br />
with other agencies of the governrnent when<br />
necessary.<br />
Standards Issued and Proposed<br />
The Congress legislated average passenger car fuel<br />
economy standards for MY 1978, 1979, and 1980,<br />
at 18, 19, and 20 miles per gallon (mpg), respectively,<br />
and directed that the Secretary issue standards<br />
for MY l98t through 1984, leading to a goal<br />
of 27 .5 mpg by MY 1985. The Secretary is directed<br />
to consider technological feasibility, economic<br />
practicality, and the effects of motor vehicle<br />
safety standards.<br />
The standards which haye been established and the<br />
anticipated results are:*<br />
. For passenger automobiles the averages are<br />
set at 22,24,26, and 27 mpg for MY 1981, 1982,<br />
1983, and 1984. These fleet averages are deemed<br />
to be within the capability of the manufacturing<br />
industry to meet with ease. lt is anticipated that<br />
the standards will result in savings of 590,000 barrels<br />
of fuel per day by 1985 and I.2 million barrels<br />
per day in 1995 over the 1980 average of 20 mpg.<br />
This amounts to the amazing cumulative saving of<br />
4.3 billion barrels by 1995, equal to half ol' the<br />
estimated oil reserves in Alaska.<br />
r The economic effects on the consumer will<br />
also be beneficial. While price increases due to<br />
fuel economy measures may rise at the rate of<br />
about $49 per year for the 4-year period l98l<br />
through 1984, for a total price increase of about<br />
$200, savings will exceed $640 over the life of an<br />
automobile, based on a price of 650 per gallon for<br />
gasoline. The net saving to the consumer, including<br />
increases in purchase price and maintenance<br />
costs, will be about $490.<br />
r Fuel economy standards for nonpassenger<br />
vehicles (vans and light trucks) are 17.2 mpg for<br />
MY 1979 two-wheel drive vehicles, and 15.8 mpg<br />
for MY 1979 four-wheel drive general utility vehicles<br />
weighing less than 6,000 pounds. These standards,<br />
also, were set with a view to the technological<br />
state-of-the-art, and the economic consequences.<br />
Fuel savings will amount to 6,684 barrels per day<br />
under the 1979 rules. or a total of 24.4 million barrels<br />
during the lifetime of the fleet.<br />
rFor a more complete treatment of the rulemaking process, the<br />
research and rationale bchind it, and the anticipated results,<br />
see Automotive Fuel Etonomy Pragram, Sercntl Annual<br />
Reltort trt the Congrcss, .lanuary l97tl, available from Ceneral<br />
Services Division/Distrihution. NHTSA,<br />
39
It is estimated that the fuel economy standard<br />
for MY 1979 vans and light trucks could impose<br />
an additional cost to the consumer of as much as<br />
$22 per vehicle. This would be more than offset by<br />
a lifetime operating cost saving of approximately<br />
$68 per year, or about $415 (discounted for inflation)<br />
during the life of the vehicle.<br />
r In addition, the final rule establishing average<br />
fuel economy standards for vans and light trucks<br />
for MY 1980 and l98l is to be issued in March<br />
1978.*<br />
Regulntlons and Compllance<br />
Regulations have been published which cover definitions,<br />
procedures, and reports required of the<br />
manufacturers to support the standards, and petitions<br />
for granting exemptions from the standards.<br />
As required by law, a Cas Mileage Guide was<br />
prepared and distributed to dealers by the Federal<br />
Energy Adrninistration (FEA), based on measurements<br />
made by the EPA. It is the responsibility of<br />
NHTSA to enforce regulations regarding display<br />
of the Guide by new automobile dealers. A nationwide<br />
survey of more than 200 dealers found that<br />
some 60 percent were not prominently displaying<br />
the Cuide. Letters have been sent to 26,fi)0 dealers<br />
informing them of their obligation. If the mailing<br />
fails to have the desired results, further enforcement<br />
measures are planned.<br />
Fuel F.conomy Reseflrch<br />
ln 1977, NHTSA continued the fuel economy research<br />
program, to provide the data and analysis<br />
to fulfill its responsibilities. This research program<br />
was separated into five categories;<br />
. Assessment of Automotive Technology-The<br />
evaluation of production and future hardware<br />
*MY 1980 standard was set at 16 mpg for two-wheel drive and<br />
14 mpg for four-whccl drive vehicles. MY l98l standard was<br />
set at l8 mpg for two-wheel drive and 15.5 mpg for fourwheel<br />
drive vehicles.<br />
40<br />
available to manufacturers to achieve fuel economy<br />
improvements on passenger automobiles,<br />
and on vans and light trucks of less than 10,000<br />
pounds GVWR (individually and in fleets). lmprovements<br />
include weight and performance<br />
reductions, engine and drive train improvements,<br />
alternative engines and transmissions, improved<br />
lubricants, reduced aerodynamic drag, and rolling<br />
resistance.<br />
. Effects of Other Federal Standurds on Fuel<br />
Economy-The interactions between the requirements<br />
for fuel economy, emission, noise, safety<br />
and damageability standards, as well as the effects<br />
of other Federal standards (occupational safety,<br />
health, and environmental) on manufacturing<br />
plants and production capabilities.<br />
t Industrial Analysis-The evaluation of production<br />
problems and costs of technological improvements<br />
(individually and in combinations),<br />
the assessment of manufacturers' capabilities and<br />
leadtimes in implementing fuel economy improvements,<br />
capital requirements and the feasibility of<br />
obtaining capital, the evaluation of each manufacturer's<br />
ability to meet the standard$, and assessment<br />
of the impact upon the labor force.<br />
t Economic Analyses^The effects of fuel<br />
economy standards (and/or other conservation<br />
actions) on automobile prices and demand, on<br />
employment, and on cost of ownership and operation<br />
of automobiles. This category also deals with<br />
domestic competition, consumer choices, imports,<br />
air quality, highway safety, and aggregate economic<br />
effects on the automobile industry, the national<br />
economy, and petroleum and other national<br />
resources. Underscoring these considerations are<br />
the availability and price of fuel.<br />
t Market Analyses-The interactions between<br />
automobile products offered and the acceptance<br />
they receive in the marketplace, in view of fuel<br />
economy standards, government policies, and fuel<br />
prices.<br />
The major accomplishments of this program during<br />
1977 are shown in Table I I.
Table 11. 1977 Fuel Economy Stendads and Rogulatlons<br />
Date lssued Type<br />
Average Fuel Economy Standards for Nonpassenger Automoblles 318177 New Standard<br />
Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards 6127177 New $tandard<br />
Vehicle Classification 7128177 Definitional<br />
Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles 712U77 Definitional<br />
Reduction of Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy<br />
Standards (1) Procedural -<br />
ExemptionfromAverageFue|EconomyStandards7l2w77Procedu<br />
Automotive Fuel Economy Heports (2) Procedural<br />
(1) Published 11114177<br />
(2) Published 12l1WT<br />
Title<br />
A<br />
- 4<br />
*r<br />
"i
CHAPTER 8<br />
LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE<br />
ENFORCEMENT<br />
Litigation Highlights, lg77<br />
B. F. Goodrich v. DOT. On March 21, 1977, the<br />
Supreme Court denied the request of eight tire<br />
manufacturers to review the September 2, 1976<br />
decision of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals<br />
upholding the principal provisions of the Uniform<br />
Tire Quality Grading Standards.<br />
General Motors Corporation v. Brinegar; United<br />
S/a/es v. General Motors Corporalion (Circuit<br />
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia). In<br />
october 1977, the circuit court upheld the validity<br />
of an NHTSA order that General Motors<br />
notify owners of a defect in the fuel inlet plugs installed<br />
in some 274,0001965-1966 Chevrolets and<br />
Buicks. Plug failure could result in fire.<br />
Admtnlstrfl tive Enforeement<br />
The following administrative enforcement actions<br />
were settled by accepting payments in lieu of seeking<br />
civil penalties through Court actions:<br />
r For nonconformance with vehicle lighting<br />
requirements (Standard No. 108):<br />
Easy Trail, Inc. $1,fi)0<br />
Cobra Custom Trailers I,mO<br />
Eastside Machine, Inc. 1,000<br />
Panrher Westwinds Ltd. 1,500<br />
r For nonconformance with the passenger car<br />
retreaded tire requirements (Standard No. ll7):<br />
MFA Oil Inc. $ 750<br />
Rising Bros. 250<br />
Phillips and Anderson 750<br />
r For nonconformance with motorcycle controls<br />
and displays requirements (Standard No,<br />
123):<br />
Cimatti Ltd. $1,500<br />
r For nonconformance with child $eating systems<br />
requirements (Standard No. 213)r<br />
tsabyhood Industries $ 500<br />
Pride-Trimble Corp. 500<br />
Questor Juvenile Proclucts 5,0fi1<br />
r For nonconformance with bus window retention<br />
and emergency exit requirements (Standard<br />
No. 217):<br />
Eagle lnternational lnc.<br />
Blue Bird Body Company<br />
Carpenter Body Works<br />
$1,500<br />
500<br />
l,(x)0<br />
At the end of 1977. six settlement letters had been<br />
sent to vehicle and equipment manufacturers to<br />
inform them that, unless an acceptable offer in<br />
compromise is received, civil penalties will be pursued.<br />
Two additional settlement letters, informing<br />
vehicle manufacturers that NHTSA would be willing<br />
to close its files without penalty providing<br />
acceptable notification and remedy campaigns are<br />
conducted, also were outstanding.
CHAPTER 9<br />
SPECIAL PROGRAMS<br />
International Cooperation<br />
Recognizing the universal growth in the industrialized<br />
countries of traffic injuries and fatalities, and<br />
related problems such as drunk drivers, fuel consumption,<br />
and emissions, NHTSA has been involved<br />
in a number of international activities and<br />
organizations. Although the U.S. has by tar the<br />
Iargest road network, driver,/automobile population,<br />
and background experience, international<br />
cooperation and information exchange in automobile<br />
and traffic safety continues to be mutually<br />
beneficial and productive for all participants.<br />
provides for the development of motor vehicle<br />
construction standards, including safety requirements.<br />
To date, a total of 36 regulations have been<br />
developed and attached to the 1958 Geneva Agreement.<br />
These represent one of two main sources of<br />
safety standards for the construction of motor<br />
vehicles in the world. The second source is the set<br />
of FMVSS developed by NHTSA. Many countries,<br />
including Japan, Canada, and Australia,<br />
have used NHTSA and the WP29 standards in the<br />
development of their own regulations. The EEC<br />
(Common Market) is also developing a set of<br />
directives derived from the WP29 standards.<br />
NHTSA's international efforts in 1977 included As yet, adequate harmonization between NHTSA<br />
visits and cooperation with numerous representa- standards and corresponding WP29 standards has<br />
tives of foreign Governments as well as their auto- not been achieved; a few are similar but many are<br />
mobile/traffic safety-related agencies and manu- substantially different. NHTSA is working with<br />
facturers. The primary international organizations WP29 to improve the situation, and is represented<br />
with which NHTSA has been active are; NATO's on six of the eight groups of rapporteurs that<br />
Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society develop technical drafts for WP29. With U.S.<br />
(CCMS), the Road Safety Committee of the Euro- support, WP29 has reorganized the groups of rappean<br />
Conference of Ministers of Transport porteurs to more closely parallel NHTSA's organi-<br />
(ECMT), Committee lnternational de I'Inspection zation for the development of FMVSS. A special<br />
Technique Automobile (CITA), Organization for WP29 ad hoc Group for Harmonization of<br />
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), NHTSA and WP29 Standards has been estab-<br />
European Economic Community (EEC), Interlished. The expected international laboratory test<br />
national Standards Organization (ISO), United procedures from this group will be issued as an<br />
Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE),<br />
European Experimental Vehicle Committee<br />
ECE document.<br />
(EEVC), and Japan's Ministry of International International Standards Organization<br />
Trade and Industry (MITI).<br />
International Automobile Safety Slandsrds<br />
Harmonization<br />
Many ISO test procedures are incorporated into<br />
WP29 regulations, just as many Society of Automotive<br />
Engineer (SAE) test procedures are incorporated<br />
into NHTSA regulations. NHTSA partici-<br />
The U.S. (NHTSA) participates as a voting mempates in the ISO through Technical Committee 22<br />
ber at meetings of the Group of Experts on the on the construction of automobiles, and in the<br />
Construction of Vehicles (Working Party 29), human impact testing and evaluations of Tech-<br />
Inland Transport Committee of the ECE. WP29 nical Committee 108 on mechanical vibration and<br />
operates under the 1958 Geneva Agreement, which shock. This is another means of harmonizing test<br />
4E<br />
, r<br />
I
procedures which may be incorporated into future<br />
international safety standards.<br />
The International Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />
Program<br />
The lnternational ESV Program, initiated by the<br />
CCMS Road Safety Pilot Study, is led by the<br />
United States through the NHTSA Research<br />
Safety Vehicle Program.* Research data is exchanged<br />
among governmenl and industry representatives<br />
under Memoranda of Understanding<br />
between the U.S. Government and the governments<br />
of France, Great Britain, the Federal Republic of<br />
Germany, Japan, Sweden, and Italy. In 1977,<br />
research publications included the Report on the<br />
Sixth International Conference on Experimental<br />
Vehicles,+* which contains proceedings of the<br />
October 1976 Washington, D.C., conference and<br />
test reports on U.S. crash tests of the Renault<br />
Basic Research Vehicle and the British Leyland<br />
Marina Research Safety Vehicle (Figure 26).<br />
Communications with Japan continue through the<br />
Ministry of lnternational Trade and Industry. The<br />
European Experimental Vehicles Committee coordinates<br />
car safety technical activities of European<br />
participants in the international program.<br />
In November 1977, the NHTSA Administrator<br />
attended an EEVC meeting in London for the<br />
purpo$e of planning future ESV conferences, experimental<br />
vehicle activities, and research data<br />
exchanges. The next ESV conference is tentatively<br />
scheduled for Paris in 1979.<br />
Blomechanics and Anthropomorphic Test<br />
Dummies<br />
International Head-Neck lnjury Workshops held<br />
in Washington, D.C. and Ann Arbor, Michigan<br />
during 1977 were sponsored by NHTSA. Participants<br />
included medical and engineering research<br />
representatives from the U.S., England, France,<br />
Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland. In process,<br />
as the result of these workshops, are standardized<br />
procedures for head-neck autopsy, injury identification<br />
with appropriate computer-oriented<br />
coding, and arrangements for storage of, and<br />
+See Crash Survivability, IntegratedVehicle<br />
Systems Programs.<br />
'rSee Appendix D, No, 11,<br />
46<br />
;l<br />
. t,t:l<br />
Figure 26, British Leyland Marina RSV<br />
common access<br />
to, brain injury data from cooperating<br />
research hospitals in this country and<br />
abroad.<br />
NHTSA participated in the EEVC Biomechanics<br />
Working Croupn the International Research com*<br />
mittee on Biokinetics (IRCOBI), and the ISO<br />
meeting held in Berlin and Vienna during September<br />
1977 . Arrangements were made to assist European<br />
biomedical researchers in coordinating<br />
instrumentation protocol, using uniform coordinate<br />
systems, standardizing methods of injury<br />
identification and reporting, and adopting comr<br />
mon injury coding procedures for injury data<br />
banks.<br />
NHTSA personnel engaged in the organization<br />
and work of the Fifth International Workshop of<br />
Human Subjects for Biomechanical Research,<br />
held in November 1977 in New Orleans. Representatives<br />
from seven countries participated. For<br />
the past five years these workshops have been<br />
directed at developing uniform procedures for the<br />
use of humans and animals as test subjects, to generate<br />
information on human tolerance to crash<br />
injury.<br />
Support of the l)epartments of Stnte and<br />
Cornmerce Bila teral Government Consultations<br />
with Japan<br />
NHTSA provides technical support to the U.S.<br />
delegation participating in bilateral consultations<br />
with the Government of Japan on automobile<br />
safety standards and certification procedures.<br />
'fhe<br />
consultations held in Tokyo during September<br />
1977 improved the mutual understanding of the<br />
entry procedures for vehicles of U.S. manufacture<br />
into the Japanese market.
Handicapped Drivers<br />
In November 1977, NHTSA sent a representative<br />
to the Department of Commerce-sponsored<br />
"Rehabilitation<br />
USA" seminar in Tokyo, Japan,<br />
to present a paper describing NHTSA research<br />
and development programs related to handicapped<br />
drivers and rulemaking actions planned for<br />
drivers' adaptive controls.<br />
U.S.-Canadian Test Facility Coordination<br />
Coordination with Canadian counterparts in the<br />
Ministry of Transport on design of facilities for<br />
testing motor vehicles and equipment continued<br />
during 1977. Plans, specifications, and equipment<br />
lists for the NHTSA Compliance Test Facility<br />
have been released for use by the Canadian Ministry<br />
ol Transport and its contractors for their<br />
Motor Vehicle Test Center. Representatives of the<br />
Canadian architect-engineer firm visited the Engineering<br />
Test Facility in East Liberty, Ohio, for<br />
discussion of NHTSA's current and projected instrumentation<br />
capability.<br />
No-Damage Bumper System<br />
Proposals to delay tougher requirements in the<br />
federal standard on passenger car bumpers have<br />
been withdrawn in line with comments presented<br />
at a public hearing in July, which showed that a<br />
delay in the effective date was not justified.<br />
The primary goal of the bumper standard, which<br />
was mandated by Congress in the Motor Vehicle<br />
Information and Cost Saving.s Act, is to reduce<br />
the cost of low-speed collisions.+ It incorporates<br />
the requirement$ currently contained in Standard<br />
No. 215 which, since MY 1974, has required passenger<br />
car bumpers to withstand crashes of 5 miles<br />
per hour, both front and rear, without damage to<br />
safety systems such as lighting, fuel, exhaust,<br />
braking, steering, cooling, and latching.<br />
The new standard not only prohibits damage to<br />
safety systems, but also to all vehicle surfaces<br />
except for the bumper, in 5-mph front and rearend<br />
crashes, beginning with cars manufactured in<br />
the 1979 model year. The second-phase requirements<br />
of the standard, scheduled to take effect in<br />
MY 1980, limit damage to the bumper face bar to<br />
*For information on bumper work, other than "no-damage",<br />
sec scctions on Pedestrian Protection and lnteerated Vehicle<br />
Svstems,<br />
%-inch dents, and lirnit overall flattening of the<br />
bumper<br />
face bar to %-inch.<br />
Information submitted by the automobile manufacturers<br />
indicates that consumers will have to pay<br />
about $6 to $ l0 more, on the average, for a vehicle<br />
equippcd with Phase II bumpers than for a vehicle<br />
with Phase I bumpers. This cost increase is expected<br />
to be far outweighed by the benefits of the<br />
more damage-resistant bumper systems.<br />
Electric and Hybrid Vehicles SummsrT<br />
The Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development,<br />
and Demonstration Act of 1976 (Public<br />
Law 94-413) reflected a determination lry Congress<br />
that the introduction of electric and hybrid vehicles<br />
would be practical, would substantially reduce<br />
domestic use of petroleum and, would in turn,<br />
decrease dependence on foreign sources of oil. In<br />
response to the legislative requirements, NHTSA<br />
activities included the following in 1977:<br />
r Completed a study+ of current and future<br />
applicability of safety standards and regulations<br />
to these vehicles, which concluded that most existing<br />
standards will be applicable, with certain modifications.<br />
. Analyzed available test data on electric and<br />
hybrid vehicles (crash and performance tests) visa-vis<br />
data on internal combustion engine vehicles.<br />
Additional crash tests were planned, as well as<br />
demonstration fleets, to obtain data necessary for<br />
future requirements.<br />
. Held a public hearing to obtain the views of<br />
all interested parties.<br />
r Made recommendations to develop standards<br />
to deal with unique hazards of these vehicles and<br />
provide a level oI safety consistent with that anticipated<br />
for other vehicles.<br />
r Reported to the Congress and the Energy<br />
Research and Development Administration on the<br />
results of the study.<br />
Odometer Tampering<br />
The odometer tampering program is going through<br />
a trial pcriod to assess the ultimate levels of enlbrcement<br />
that will be needed. The initial NHTSA<br />
*Availablc from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA, 400 7th<br />
Street, S.w,, Washington, D.C. 20590.<br />
47
effort has concentrated on helping consumers make odometer tampering more difficult.<br />
pursue their rights of action and in assisting law<br />
enforcement agencies through advice and refer- The Department of Justice has participated in or<br />
' I<br />
rals. The Washington Office has processed over coordinated Federal investigation of approxi-<br />
2fi) odometer complaints. Some have been referred<br />
to other enforcement agencies, and others<br />
mately 50 automobile dealerships and wholesalers.<br />
ln Minnesota, five defendants pled guilty and l<br />
have been followed up through inquiries to State have received short prison sentences. In New Jer- I<br />
recorcls or warning letters to individuals suspected sey, fines and civil restitution have been imposed i<br />
ofsellingvehicleswithalteredodometers.TheonatleaStsevendefendants.lnKentu<br />
regions also have handlecl numerous complaints. defendants pled guilty, paid substantial fines, and I<br />
A vehicle standard has been proposed that would served time in prison.<br />
48
CHAPTER<br />
1O<br />
THE CONSUMER'S<br />
ADVOCATE<br />
Informing the Press and the Public<br />
There were many requests for interviews with<br />
NHTSA officials from the daily, weekly, trade,<br />
and international press as well as from radio and<br />
television news reporters and analysts. These interviews<br />
and countless inquiries by telephone and in<br />
person resulted in special articles, and radio and<br />
television news spots throughout the country.<br />
Two-minute, ll-minute, and lS-minute films on<br />
air bags were widely distributed and used. Spot<br />
announcements also were prepared and distrib-<br />
uted on such subjects as alcohol and driving,<br />
motorcycle and bicycle safety, and the 55-mph<br />
national speed limit.<br />
Serving the Consumer<br />
NHTSA services include assisting the consumer in<br />
the resolution of vehicle and vehicle equipment<br />
safety problems, keeping the consumer informed<br />
of automotive safety problems, and furnishing in-<br />
formational materials on all aspects of motor<br />
vehicle safety.<br />
The public's growing interest in the safety and<br />
econorny of automotive transportatiOn was evi- The Auto Safety Hotline was made a permanent<br />
denced by the demand for information, reports of facility and its services publicized. By year's end<br />
defects, and response to demonstration projects this national, toll-free service was handling 300 to<br />
and publicity campaigns. NHTSA issued some 123 500 inquiries daily. The sready flow of safety-<br />
news releases, dealing with various aspects of related data received by NHTSA through Hotline<br />
NHTSA operations, including standards, regula- inquiries is of great value in the defects investigations,<br />
compliance activities, motor vehicle accition function, and in the recall of vehicles and<br />
dent costs of $43 billion annually, use of State equipment for correction of dangerous problems.<br />
highway safety funds to promote the use of Citi- On the other hand, the public receives NHTSA<br />
zens' Band (CB) radios for highway emergencies, expertise in resolving vehicle problems, or prompt<br />
incentive grants to States for reducing their high- referral to the proper jurisdiction to handle inquirway<br />
fatalities and fatality rates, and technical ies outside the purview of this agency.<br />
assistance to the States to improve their 55-mph<br />
enforcement programs. A monthly<br />
These news releases received<br />
wide coverage in U.S. newspapers, magazines,<br />
and trade publications.<br />
"Consumer Report Package" was instituted,<br />
to assist consumer groups and agencies<br />
throughout the counrry in handling vehicle problems<br />
that plague the consumer, and to answer the<br />
need for motor vehicle safety information. The<br />
packages, mailed to some 230 consumer agencies<br />
(Federal, State, local, and private), contain news<br />
releases on new vehicle defect investigation recalls<br />
and on tire and equipment recalls.<br />
A new service to the consumer is the publication<br />
of "Consumer Advisories", in the form of press<br />
releases, to get the information on safety problems<br />
to the motoring public as quickly as possible. ln<br />
addition to information on investigations and<br />
recalls, the releases solicit reports from consumers<br />
on problems such as those being investigated and,<br />
whenever possible, furnish advice on precautions<br />
to be observed pending correction. Forty-three<br />
such advisories were issued during 1977.<br />
In addition to the Hotline, 600-700 complaints<br />
and inquiries from the public are handled monthly.<br />
All are responded to, and the complaints made<br />
known to the manufacturers.<br />
49
50<br />
Flgure 27- Sate Driving ln Winter<br />
A new Fact Sheet on Brake Fluids* was published<br />
during the reporting period as well as a booklet on<br />
Safe Driving in Winter+, and Spanish language<br />
versions of Tips on Car Care and Safety for DeuJ<br />
Drivers* (Figures 2? and 28).<br />
, HL CUIDADO Y LA<br />
1;1iii,,, 'i''"' $EGURIDAD DEL<br />
., AUTOMOVIL<br />
Figure 28. Tips on Car Care and Safety for Deal<br />
Drivers-SPanish Version<br />
+Available on request from General Services Dvision,<br />
NHTSA. 4fi) 7th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590.
CHAPTER 11<br />
RESEARCH AND HOW IT IS USED<br />
The purpose of the research program is to develop<br />
a data base that will support the motor vehicle and<br />
highway safety programs of the National Highway<br />
Traffic Safety Administration in its campaign to<br />
save lives and reduce injuries on our Nation's<br />
streets and highways. Research is planned and carried<br />
out to discover trends, to pinpoint problems,<br />
and to provide solutions. A major effort is currently<br />
underway to help the automotive industry<br />
design and produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.<br />
while still maintaining vehicle safery and integrity.<br />
Tables 12 and 13 list examples of NHTSA and<br />
FHWA research projects and describe how they<br />
have been, or may be, applied.<br />
Analysis, Evnluation, and Dissemination<br />
of Research<br />
The utilization of research and development to<br />
solve highway safety problems may be illustrated<br />
by outlining an ideal sequence of steps. Occasionally,<br />
unusual events in the traffic and highway<br />
safety situation require a reordering or combining<br />
of the phases. Ideally, the activities should flow as<br />
follows:<br />
t Problem Awareness-Research data cari trigger<br />
an alert to a new or growing problem and<br />
determine whether a real problem exists.<br />
t FocusinE on the Solution-Once the problem<br />
is understood, research focuses on discovering<br />
promising solutions-making sure of the alternatives<br />
for breaking the causal chain of events leading<br />
to the accident, reducing the impacr of the<br />
crash, or eliminating the situation in which the<br />
accident takes place.<br />
r Testinq the Solution-After finding that a<br />
particular safety I'eature or solution is feasible and<br />
appears practical, development and testing is<br />
needed to prove the effectiveness of the countermeasure<br />
and how it should be instituted. The<br />
result is a complete package that can be provided<br />
to States and communities for use, or form the<br />
basis for a new or amended safety standard.<br />
t Determination of Effictiveness of Existing<br />
Programs-Programs are utilized in real situations<br />
and the data from these programs are made available<br />
to practitioners and researchers. Specific<br />
applications in a number of aspects of highway<br />
safety are described in the accompanying tables.<br />
Table 13 is devoted to NHTSA data acquisition<br />
and statistical functions.<br />
Current Research Grants and Contracts<br />
and the Problems They Address<br />
Appendix E contains a list of research contract$<br />
which were active during calendar year 1977.<br />
NHTSA policy favors competitive procurement<br />
rather than the use of grants. The bulk of the<br />
research is performed by private industry and<br />
universities instead of by government employees.<br />
Research is carried out primarily to develop data<br />
to support near-term and future standards.<br />
NHTSA and FHWA continue to allocate a significant<br />
portion of their research to priority programs.<br />
NHTSA priorities now include increased<br />
emphasis on motorcycle, moped, and pedestrian<br />
safety; emphasis on fundamental approaches to<br />
reducing alcohol and drug-related accidents;<br />
research to develop the technical support for fuel<br />
economy standards; research to support passive<br />
restraint standards; the integrated vehicle systems<br />
program to design, develop, construct, and test<br />
research vehicles embodying advanced tcchnological<br />
features; and the initial portion of the<br />
NASS by the National Center for Statistics and<br />
Analysis.<br />
51<br />
.J,
Table 72. 1977 Research Accompllshments and Application to Motor Vehicle Standards<br />
Accomplishments<br />
Developed the technical support for the 1979 non'<br />
passenger automobile fuel economy standards<br />
rulemaking.<br />
Developed the technical support for the 1981-1984<br />
passenger automobile fuel economy standards<br />
rulemaking.<br />
Developed technical support for the proposed<br />
1980-1981 nonpassenger automobile fuel economy<br />
standards rulemaking.<br />
Currently developing technical support for pro'<br />
posed 1984-1986 passenger automobile fuel econ'<br />
omy standards rulemaking'<br />
Accomplishments<br />
Conducted full-scale crash tests with Ch€vsttes<br />
and Vegas, to demonstrate that driver air bag systems<br />
using off-the-shelf technology will meet the<br />
requirements of FMVS$ No. 208, Passive Festaints,<br />
in small cars.<br />
Completed accident data analysis for Vega and<br />
Capri production steering columns.<br />
Initiated a program to obtain data on the motion of<br />
occupants in lateral collisions.<br />
Conducted a program to integrate advanced technology<br />
active and passive restraint systems into<br />
production compact cars (Volvos).<br />
Conducted a series of tests to evaluate ths benefits<br />
of a web locking device in improving the performance<br />
of stock three'point seat-belt systems (1975<br />
Torlno).<br />
Initiated a program to develop improved passive<br />
belts for occupants of small cars.<br />
Conducted Phase I development program for pas'<br />
sive air bag protectlon for front-seat passengers of<br />
small cars.<br />
Accompllehments<br />
Sponsored and conducted two workshops on<br />
"Head and Neck lnjury." Initial efforts have produced<br />
a standardized head-neck autopsy protocol<br />
and an initial proposed coding suitable for computer<br />
storage and retrleval.<br />
52<br />
FUEL ECONOMY<br />
OCCUPANT PACKAGING<br />
Application<br />
Standards were issued by NHTSA in March 1977.<br />
Standards were issued by NHTSA in July 1977.<br />
Proposed standards were issued December 15'<br />
1977.<br />
Proposed stqndards to be issued by NHTSA in mid-<br />
FY 1978.<br />
Application<br />
$upports passive restraints standard (FMVSS No.<br />
208) issued in June 1977.<br />
Supports upgrade of steering column standards<br />
(FMVSS No. 203 and No. 204).<br />
Supports upgrade of occupant protection stand'<br />
ards for lateral collisions.<br />
Supports the pa$sive restraint standard (FMVSS<br />
No. 208) for smaller cars and lays the groundwork<br />
for the FMVSS 400 Series- of standards for passive<br />
protection at higher speeds.<br />
Supports the FMVSS 400 Series of standards for<br />
passive protection at higher speeds'<br />
Supports FMVSS No. 208 issued in June 1977, and<br />
lays the groundwork for the FMVS$ 400 $eries of<br />
standards for passive protection at higher speeds.<br />
Supports FMVSS No. 208 issued in June 1977, and<br />
lays the groundwork for the FMVSS 400 Series of<br />
standards for passive protection at higher speeds'<br />
BIOMECHANICS<br />
Appflcatlon<br />
This process will ultimately provide a data base of<br />
actual head and neck injuries upon which to<br />
develop improved head injury criteria for upgrading<br />
occupant protection standards. flo be included in a<br />
new series)
Table '12. 1977 Research Accomplishments end Application to Motor Vehicle Standards<br />
(Gontinued)<br />
BIOMECHANICS-Continued<br />
Accomplishments Application<br />
Initiated study of femur-pelvic complex injuries in<br />
the automobile crash environment.<br />
Demonstrated feasibility of accurately predicting<br />
head and brain injury f rom head motion parameters.<br />
Designed and built a mechanfcal impacting systBffi<br />
which has been used to replicate the impact of a<br />
pedestrian leg on the front of a vehicle.<br />
Will provide a basis for the improvement of occu.<br />
pant protection standards (a new series) especially<br />
in the lateral impact mode.<br />
Appropriate Extsnsion of this approach will provide<br />
the basis for a more valid head protection perform.<br />
ance standard for application to a new series.<br />
Provides the basis for leg protection in a pedestrian<br />
impact injury mitigation standard.<br />
STRUCTURES<br />
Accomplishments Appllcation<br />
Initlated experimental and analytical research for<br />
the development of structural concepts to improve<br />
side impact protection of subcompact and compact<br />
vehicles.<br />
Investigated the structural and englne mass aggressive<br />
effects in car-to-car collisions.<br />
Initiated research for the development of testmethods<br />
and devices for measuring aggressiv+<br />
ness of production vehicles.<br />
Initiated testing of existing "basellne" electrlc<br />
vehicles.<br />
VEHICLE HANDLING<br />
Will provlde technlcal basis and support for upgrading<br />
the side impact protection standard<br />
(FMVSS No.214).<br />
Will assist in the development of efflclent iest<br />
methods and devices for measuring aggressiveness<br />
of future production vehicles (FMVSS 400<br />
Series).<br />
Will provide technical basis and compliance proce.<br />
dures for future vehicle compatibility/aggressiveness<br />
standards (FMVSS 400 $eries).<br />
Provided data for the report to Congress,<br />
"Appllca.<br />
bility of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />
and Regulations to Electric and Hybrid Vehicles."<br />
Accomplishments Application<br />
Tested response parameters for a sample of motorcycles<br />
and correlated the results with proven<br />
experiences, Effectiveness of anti-lock brakes in<br />
accident avoidance was also examined.<br />
Initiated deVelopment of a hierarchy of vehicte<br />
simulation models for evaluating open and closed<br />
loop dynamic responses of vehicles.<br />
Began fabricatlon of a modular wind-generating<br />
machine designed to simulate a variety of aero.<br />
dynamic disturbances.<br />
Began fabrication of a portable device which will<br />
provide data on the dynamic handling propefiies of<br />
vehicles.<br />
Inltiated study on the effects of truck and trailer<br />
frame torsional bending relative to their handling<br />
and stability.<br />
Test procedures developed will be suitable for<br />
assessing controllability of motorcycles. Performance<br />
criteria will support future rulemaking.<br />
Models will serve as effective tools in developing<br />
efficient test methods in the area of vehicle handling.<br />
Will verlfy vehicle response to known aerodynamic<br />
disturbances and set performance standards for<br />
eventual rulemaking.<br />
aid those NHTSA contractors Involved in<br />
utilizing computer simulation techniques for handling<br />
studies.<br />
Quantif ication of this unknown element wlll lead to<br />
better understanding of this class of vehicle and<br />
provide the basis for rulemaking.<br />
53
Table 12. lgTT Research Accompllshments and Application to Motor Vehlcle $tandards<br />
(Contlnued)<br />
Accomplishments<br />
Initiated investigation on the feasibllity of applying<br />
the principles of fluidics to anti-lock brakes for<br />
motorcycles.<br />
Completed the design, fabrlcation and checkout of<br />
a lightweight, highly reliable, accurate instrumenta'<br />
tion package suitable for crash-avoidance testing<br />
of small vehicles.<br />
Accomplishments<br />
Continued work on accelerated tire treadwear<br />
validation in an effort to rate treadwear in less than<br />
50 miles, regardless of test course, and without a<br />
control tire.<br />
The non-destructive test (NDT/road correlation<br />
program is approximately 35 percent complete.<br />
Road tests have generated tire failures (stopped<br />
prior to tire rupture) and reinspection by reflection<br />
ultrasonic NDT will be accomplished in the second<br />
quarter of FY-78. Full program validation is scheduled<br />
for completion in the fourth quarter of FY-78.<br />
Revised and expanded Monograph 122,<br />
"Mechanics<br />
of Pneumatic Tires," to ref lect the advances in the<br />
state-of-the-art, applicable to theory, test and<br />
manufacture of tires, since its 1971 edition.<br />
Developed and applied for a patent on a NDT tire<br />
casing bead integrity system. NHTSA patent application<br />
will permit system design and use to all<br />
interested users.<br />
Accomolishments<br />
VEHICLE HANDLING-Conllnued<br />
Conducted preliminary research to establish passenger<br />
car hydraulic brake performance levels lor<br />
straight and curved path braking on surfaces hav'<br />
ing low and split coefficients of friction.<br />
Initiated research into the development of a long'<br />
life hydraulic brake system and test methods cap+<br />
ble of establishing durability levels.<br />
Initiated research to develop a single braking per'<br />
formance standard for trucks, buses, and multipurpose<br />
passenger vehicles having either hydraulic<br />
or air brakes.<br />
Conducted testing to evaluate compatibility prob'<br />
lems experienced in operating mixtures of pre- and<br />
post-FMVSS No. 121 braking systems in combina'<br />
tion heavy duty vehicles.<br />
54<br />
Application<br />
Demonstrates the technical and economical benefits<br />
of this approach and provides a data base for<br />
potential rulemaki ng actions.<br />
Will be used by NHTSA contractors, particularly for<br />
testing vehicles with small load capacities; i.e.,<br />
where regular instrumentation would cause overload.<br />
BRAKES<br />
Application<br />
lf successful, new system and test technique could<br />
be used for compliance testing and certification.<br />
NDT wlll be useful for precompllance testlng In<br />
identifying defective tires, as well as for determin.<br />
ing faults generated during compliance testing.<br />
Utilized by all who are interested in improving tire<br />
performance and safety.<br />
Cost effective NDT system for use in FMVSS"I17<br />
compliance testing. System will detect casing bead<br />
failures prior to retreading and assure quality and<br />
safer retreads.<br />
Application<br />
Expand and improve FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic<br />
Erake Sysfems.<br />
Expand FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic Brake Sysferns.<br />
Supports FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic Brake<br />
Sysfems and FMVSS No. 121, Air Bra4e Sysferns.<br />
$upport FMVSS No. 121, Air Brake Sysfefl?s'<br />
:
Tabfe 12' 1977 Research Accompllshments and Appllcatlon to Motor Vehlcle Standeds<br />
(Contlnued)<br />
BRAKES-Contlnued<br />
Accomplishments Application<br />
Completed f ntegration of electronic emergency Docket 72-1, Automatic Braitng Systems, ANPHM.<br />
braking function with two types of production brak.<br />
lng systems (hydraulic power boost and vacuum :<br />
power boost), and conducted preliminary controlled<br />
tEsts.<br />
THE DRIVER AND THE VEHICLE<br />
Accomplishments Application<br />
ldentified and studied driver problems in operating Supports upgrading of FMVSS No. 101.<br />
fingertip reach controls.<br />
ldentified the significance of mismatches between Will have an impact on setting priorities for future<br />
driver capabilities and vehicle design characteris- resgarch and rulemaking.<br />
tics in accident causation.<br />
Completed a field study of several innovatlve rear After verlflcation, thls type of rear lighilng system<br />
fighting and signalling systems and lound that a may be considered in a future revision of FMVSS<br />
single, center, high-mounted brake signal reduced No. 108.<br />
rear-end accidents by 54% compared to a control<br />
group with the conventional rear system.<br />
Developed a method for analytically evaluating Wll be consldered in future revlslons of FMVSS<br />
vehicle lighting in fog and determined lamp design No. 108, to Incorporate a fog lamp standard.<br />
parameters for improved fog lamps.<br />
Analyzed the signalling requirements for emer- May be consldered in future revisions of FMVSS<br />
gency, school bus, and service vehicles and devel- No. 108, to incorporate emergency signal lights in<br />
oped recommendations for a nationwide unllorm this standard.<br />
communication system for those vehicles.<br />
Initiated a study to evaluate the feasibility of a May be used in future revisions of FMVSS No. 10g.<br />
single beam headlighting system.<br />
Developed equipment and procedures for objective Will provide a basis for establishing refined<br />
measurement of visibility quality, and collected performance standards for windshield wipers,<br />
preliminary data relating such measures to driver washers, defrosters, and defogger$, and a means<br />
visual performance. for compliance te$ting against such standards.<br />
Completed a study of ability of passenger car Provide important data relative to the integrated<br />
drivers to detect, identify, and judge targets p6r- direct and indirect visibility requirements of vehicle<br />
ceived only through peripheral vislon. drivers and the establishment of an integrated<br />
standard lor vehicle vislbility systems.<br />
FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS<br />
Accompllshments Appticalon<br />
fnitiated research to identifyanti-theft performance Upgrade FMVSS No. 114, Thelt prevention-pascriteria<br />
and develop a cost beneficlal security sys- senger Cars.<br />
tem for passenger cars that is effective in reducrng<br />
th6ft.<br />
'This<br />
will be a new s6rl6s not previously having a numerical d€Blgnailon,<br />
55<br />
:
Table 13. Data Acqulsition and Statlstlcal Analysis<br />
Flesearch AccomPl ishments<br />
Publlshed two studies evaluating the effects of the<br />
S$mph speed limit.<br />
Initiated a truck fleet accident evaluation of the alr<br />
brake standard.<br />
Contlnued the motorcycllst neck injury study'<br />
Completed a study on causss of motor vehicle traf'<br />
fic accidents.<br />
Initiated an lntegrated and contlnulng natlonwlde<br />
sample of motor vehicle accident phenomena'<br />
Published a statistical study of heavy truck accldent<br />
severity.<br />
Continued crash severity study, focuslng on mea'<br />
sur€ment of accident severity indices with accom'<br />
panying injury.<br />
Initiated a pedestrian injury causation study.<br />
Continued and expanded the exposure data program.<br />
Initiated accident analysis ol narrow bridge colll'<br />
sions.<br />
Contlnued comparatlve study of accidents involv'<br />
ing breakaway and non-breakaw?Y poles.<br />
Provided analytlcal support to defect investlgation<br />
cases.<br />
Provided analytical support to rulemaking activi'<br />
ties.<br />
Continued field evaluation of air bag/passlve r+<br />
$traint system.<br />
Continued school bus crash investlgations.<br />
56<br />
Application<br />
To provide increased support to the maintenance of<br />
the 55-mph speed limit.<br />
To provide information on the relative accident rate<br />
of trucks with "improved"<br />
air brakes vs. those not<br />
so equipped.<br />
To determine relationship between head/neck injury<br />
and motorcycle helmet usage.<br />
Provided statistics on causes as related to driver<br />
error, driver conditions, avoidance maneuvgrs,<br />
vehicle conditions, and highway and environmental<br />
factors.<br />
To collect nationally representative data on motor<br />
vehicle accidents for detailed statistics and for<br />
design and evaluation of standards and countermeasure$.<br />
Will help to understand the safety problems of<br />
heavy trucks and the effects of increased size and<br />
weight on highway safetY.<br />
To provide better information for the design of<br />
effective crashworthiness motor vehicle safety<br />
standards.<br />
To identify injury causes, to determine pedestrian<br />
InJury severity, and to recommend modification of<br />
the vehicle exterior to eliminate vehicle protrusions.<br />
To supplement accident data, especially in the<br />
analysis of factors contributing to traffic accidents'<br />
To measure the accident problem at narrow bridges<br />
and to determine the injury severity and vehicle<br />
crashworthiness following collisions with bridges<br />
and approaches.<br />
To identify the extBnt of these accidents and to<br />
examine the relative vehlcle damage and personal<br />
injury attributed to collisions with both types of<br />
poles.<br />
Data supportecl valldity of defect assessm€nts<br />
against vehicle manufacturers and aided in preparation<br />
of court cases.<br />
Analyses and stati$tical interpretations of research<br />
studies aided in assessing the potential value of<br />
proposed highway safetY rules.<br />
To determine protection given occupants in various<br />
crash types and to provide data leading to system<br />
improvem€nts.<br />
To assess vehicle damage and its relation to occu'<br />
pant injury. May result in school bus design modif<br />
ications.
CHAPTER 12<br />
NATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY<br />
ADVISORY COUNCIL<br />
The National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory<br />
Council was created by the Congress in 1966 to<br />
consult with the Secretary of Transportation on<br />
and acceptance. During the Congress the Council<br />
presented its Excalibur Award to Dr. John D.<br />
States of Rochester, New York, for his outstand-<br />
motor vehicle safety standards. The 3O-member ing work in automotive safety. In addition, Speno<br />
Council included representatives of State and local<br />
governments, researchers, motor vehicle manufac-<br />
Awards, given annually for the best technical<br />
papers presented at the Congress, were awarded to<br />
turers, motor vehicle equipment manufacturers,<br />
and motor vehicle dealers. The Council has provided<br />
a public voice in the administration of the<br />
Joseph W. Little, Professor of Law, University of<br />
Florida, and Dr. R. Eugene Goodson of the Institute<br />
of Interdisciplinary Engineering Studies, Pur-<br />
motor vehicle safety program, and has been an due University.<br />
indicator of public and industry reaction to proposed<br />
safety standards.<br />
During 1977 the Council met in full session three<br />
Eleven of the Council's members participated in<br />
the newly-created Truck and Bus Safety Subcom,<br />
mittee, meeting jointly with their ten counterparts<br />
times, while its subcommittees met six times. The<br />
Council sponsored a Head and Neck Injury Work-<br />
of the National Highway Safety Advisory Committee's<br />
subcornrnittee. There were ll joint subshop<br />
in April, bringing together leading national<br />
and international experts in this field, and providing<br />
a forum for discussion and debate on such<br />
committee rneetings, at which issues of FMVSS<br />
No. l2l, Air Brake Systerus, were explored. As a<br />
result of public hearings and debates and staff<br />
topics as methods ol' identificarion of head and presentations, the subcommittees prepared three<br />
neck injury mechanisms and injury tolerance reports to the Secretary of Transportation.<br />
levels, the relationship of those mechanisms to the<br />
pathology of injury, and factors necessary for<br />
valid surrogate assessment of safety system performance.<br />
The overall goal of the workshop was<br />
The Council was terminated on October l, 1977,<br />
in accordance with Section 107 ol'the Motor Vehicle<br />
and Schoolbus Safety Amendments of 1974.<br />
to provide DOT with information for assessing the<br />
quality and direction of departmental programs<br />
Major accomplishments for 1977 are listed below.<br />
A list of members at termination is given in Ap-<br />
for the development of standards for head and<br />
neck protection.<br />
pendix B.<br />
In July the Council sponsored its Fifth International<br />
Congress on Automotive Safety. The theme<br />
of the Congress was "Motor Vehicle Goals Beyond<br />
1980," and the major objectives were to<br />
explore the interaction of automotive safety with<br />
fuel economy, emissions, road performance, problems<br />
of manufacturers, repair and parts replace*<br />
ment, resistance to damage, first cost, operating<br />
expenses, other economic factors, and user needs<br />
Reports<br />
t Safety Defect Recalt Campaigns*-A review<br />
of NHTSA's safety defect recall program, including<br />
a number of recommendations for broadening<br />
the scope of safety defect recall procedures and<br />
information sources.<br />
*See Appendix D, Number:t6.<br />
57
t NHTSA Research Activities*-A review of<br />
research<br />
activities within NHTSA.<br />
*See Appendix D, Nurnber 32.<br />
**Available from NHTSA,uExecutive Secretariat,<br />
r Increase campaigns to encourage use ofsafety<br />
belts.<br />
t Head and Neck Injury Seminar-Areport on<br />
a two-day seminar which prescnted current research<br />
on this subjcct, included recommendations<br />
on the use of this research, and stressed the urgent<br />
need for future research, particularly in the area<br />
of trauma,**<br />
r Revise and update NHTSA performanceoriented<br />
motor vehicle safety standards.<br />
r Prepare a film on helmet effectiveness for the<br />
benefit of States contemplating repeal of helmetuse<br />
laws.<br />
e Factor of Two-A report on the difficulties<br />
of relating car-barrier crash tests with car-car<br />
crash tests.*+<br />
. Evaluate motor vehicle safety standards and<br />
attendant activities, to determine the need for continuation<br />
or modification.<br />
r Create a representative public body, to assure<br />
Recommendntions<br />
continued review of DOT's motor vehicle safetv<br />
program.<br />
. Fromulgate a passive restraint standard,<br />
while promoting mandatory seat,belt usage as a<br />
first-step measure until passive systemsi are available.<br />
r Review and update .,Study on lg80 Goals for<br />
Commercial Vehicles" and "Report on Motor<br />
Vehicle Goals Beyond 1980."<br />
r Collect data on moped accidents.<br />
5g<br />
r Continue the International Congress on<br />
Automotive Safetv.
CHAPTER 13<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
Organizational Changes<br />
A new organization for the National Highway<br />
Traffic Safety Administration was approved on<br />
December 16, 1977, effective January l, 1978<br />
(Figure 29).<br />
Several changes were made. Major among these<br />
are the change in structure and functional alignment<br />
designed to merge all rulemaking activities<br />
(i.e., motor vehicle safety standards, average fuel<br />
economy standards, and consumer information<br />
regulations and modifications) under an Associate<br />
Administrator for Rulemaking, and the consolidation<br />
ol all enforcement activities under an Associate<br />
Administrator for Enforcement. 'Ihese<br />
changes abolish the Office of the Associate Administrator<br />
fbr Motor Vehicle Programs and the<br />
Office of Automotive Fuel Economy.<br />
ASOTIATI AOMITISTft ATON<br />
FON TFAfFIC 5AF ETY<br />
PSOGBAMS<br />
tTitl<br />
Concurrent with changes in the administration of<br />
motor vehicle safety and consumer information<br />
and protection, the planning, research, and test<br />
programs were also restructured:<br />
r The Office of Vehicle Systems Research was<br />
abolished and the Offices of Passenger Vehicle<br />
Research and l{eavy Duty Vehicle Research were<br />
placed under Research and Development.<br />
r A Vehicle Research and Test Center was<br />
established under Research and Development, to<br />
consolidate all activities of the Engineering Test<br />
Facility in East Liberty, Ohio, the Safety Research<br />
Laboratory at Riverdale, Maryland, and the Uniform<br />
Tire Quality Grading Facility at San Angelo,<br />
Texas.<br />
r The title of the Associate Administrator for<br />
Planning and Evaluation was changed to Associate<br />
Administrator for Plans and Programs, the<br />
oFFtcE 0i<br />
FUEUC ArfArAS At0<br />
c0lsuf li FAnTrcrf AT|oI<br />
Flgure 29. Netionol Hlghway Trafflc Safety Administretlon<br />
r0A{
Office of Program Planning was abolished, and<br />
the Office of Program Analysis was renamed the<br />
Office of Program and Rulemaking Analysis.<br />
r The Office of Public Affairs and Consumer<br />
Services was retitled the Office of Public Affairs<br />
and Consumer Participation, to emphasize the<br />
increased public involvement in NHTSA's programs.<br />
Management Improvements<br />
To provide management with an information system<br />
consistent with program goals and objectives,<br />
NHTSA developed procedures for recording and<br />
reporting grant obligations and expenditures<br />
(under Section 402 of the Highway Safety Act of<br />
1966) by subject matter and remedial measures.<br />
Three 40*hour technical courses in Automotive<br />
Fuel Economy were conducted by the University<br />
of Maryland, to assist about 50 NHTSA employees<br />
to adjust to program changes resulting from<br />
NHTSA's increased mission in automotive fuel<br />
economy.<br />
60<br />
Civil Rights<br />
The achievements of NHTSA's Civil Rights and<br />
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program<br />
for 1977 are summarized as follows:<br />
r A Cooperative Education Program was initiated.<br />
Participants were 42 percent minority and<br />
57 percent female.<br />
r Women employees participated, through the<br />
NHTSA Federal Women's Program, in training<br />
designed to enhance an appreciation of their<br />
potential and to develop career-planning skills.<br />
r Minority representation in professional positions<br />
was increased from 9.8 percent to 10.4 percent<br />
of total jobs in this category.<br />
r Pre-grant reviews for civil rights implications<br />
were made for the first time-and prior to funding-of<br />
all State highway safety plans.<br />
r The goal of contracts awarded to minority<br />
business enterprises was exceeded for the sixth<br />
consecutive year.
GLOSSARY<br />
CB<br />
CCMS<br />
CITA<br />
CMT<br />
DOT<br />
ECE<br />
ECMT<br />
EEC<br />
EEO<br />
EEVC<br />
EPA<br />
ESV<br />
ETF<br />
FARS<br />
FEA<br />
FHWA<br />
FMVSS<br />
6PO<br />
GVWR<br />
tRvw<br />
rsA<br />
ISRS<br />
M<br />
MITI<br />
MPC<br />
MY<br />
NASS<br />
NCSA<br />
NCSS<br />
NHTSA<br />
NTIS<br />
OECD<br />
PICS<br />
RSV<br />
SAE<br />
SRL<br />
TRC<br />
UTQG<br />
- Citizens' Band<br />
* Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society<br />
- Committee International de I'Inspcction Technique Automobile<br />
- Course Monitoring Tire<br />
- Department of Transportation<br />
- Economic Commission for Europe<br />
- European Conference oI Ministers of Transport<br />
- European Economic Community<br />
- Equal Employment Opportunity<br />
- European Experimental Vehicle Committee<br />
- Environmental Protection Agency<br />
- Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />
- Engineering Test Facility<br />
- Fatal Accident Reporting System<br />
- Federal Energy Administration<br />
- Federal Highway Adtnitristration<br />
* Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard<br />
- Government Printing Office<br />
- Gross Vehicle Wcight Rating<br />
- Integratcd Research Volkswagen<br />
- Internalional Standards Orgatrization<br />
- Injury Severity Reporting System<br />
- Million<br />
- Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Japan)<br />
- Miles Per Gallon<br />
- Model Year<br />
- National Accident Sampling System<br />
- National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />
- National Crash Severity Study<br />
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration<br />
- National Technical Information Service<br />
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development<br />
- Pedestrian lnjury Causation Study<br />
- Research Safety Vehicle<br />
- Society of Automotive Engineers<br />
- Safety Research Laboratory<br />
- Transportation Research Center<br />
- Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />
61
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure Page<br />
A-1<br />
A-Z<br />
A-3<br />
A-4<br />
A-5<br />
A-6<br />
A.7<br />
A-8<br />
Trends in Vehicle Mileage and Mileage Death Rate, 1957-1977<br />
Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by State, 1977 and Percent Change from 1976<br />
Motor Vehicle Traffic Death Rate, 1977, and Percent Change from 1976<br />
Trends in Motor Vehicle Registrations, Licensed Drivers and Vehicle Miles of Travgl,<br />
A-5<br />
A"6<br />
A-7<br />
A-8<br />
A-S<br />
A-10<br />
1957-1577<br />
A-14 Pedestrian and Motor Vehlcle Occupant Fatalltles, 1957-1977<br />
A-14 Motorcycle and Bicycle Fatalities, 1957-1977<br />
A-15 Weekend-Weekday Contrast in Fatality Rates, 1977<br />
A-16 Monthly Death Rates,lor 1972,1973, and 1977<br />
A-17 Trend in Motor Vehicle Death Rates, 1957-1977<br />
A-18 Trend in Ratios of Registered Vehicles to Drivers and Population, 1957*1977<br />
.<br />
A-11<br />
A-12<br />
A-13<br />
A-14<br />
A-15<br />
A-16<br />
A-17<br />
A-18<br />
A-19<br />
A-20<br />
A'21<br />
A-22<br />
A-20 Total Motor Vehicle Travel, 1957-1977<br />
A-21 Motor Vehicle Travel on All Highway Systems, 1971-1976<br />
A"22 Motor Vehicle Travel on the Interstate Highway System, 1971-1976<br />
A.22 Motor Vehicle Travel on Non-lnterstate Highway Systems, 1971-1976<br />
A-23 Average Free-Moving Travel Speed on the Rural Interstate System, 1960-1977<br />
A-25 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />
4-26 Percent Increase in Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977<br />
A-28 Distribution of Male Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />
A-28 Percent Increase in Male Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977<br />
A-30 Distribution of Female Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />
A-31 Percent Increase in Female Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1ffi7-1977<br />
A-35 Comparison of Traffic Deaths and lndustrial Production Index, U.S., 1957-1977<br />
A'3 ,'.
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table<br />
A-1<br />
A-2<br />
A-3<br />
A-4<br />
A-5<br />
A-6<br />
A-7<br />
A-8<br />
A-S<br />
A-10<br />
A-11<br />
A-12<br />
A-13<br />
A-14<br />
A15<br />
A16<br />
A-17<br />
A-4<br />
Page<br />
A-9 Basic Statistics About Motor Vehicle Traffic Deaths in the United States<br />
1957, 1967-1977<br />
A-10 Basic Data Pertaining to Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, United States, 1957-1977<br />
A-11 Growth in Population and Motor Vehicle Registration<br />
A"12 Number and Distribution of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Type, 1957-1977<br />
A-13 Number and Population Death Flate of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Type in<br />
the Accident, 1957 -1977<br />
A-19 Types of Motor Vehicles Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1975-1976<br />
A-19 Comparison of Number of Miles Traveled Annually by Type of Vehicle, 1975-1976<br />
A-24 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977, Total<br />
A-27 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977, Male<br />
A-29 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1971, Female<br />
A-32 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />
A-33 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Male Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />
A-34 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Female Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />
A-36 $afety Belt Percent Usage, 1974-1977 Passenger Cars<br />
A-37 Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Age and Sex, United States, 1976<br />
A-38 Leading Causes of Death by Age and Sex, United States, 1975<br />
A-46 Fatality Rates for the United States and Setected Foreign Countries, 1g7S
Motor Vehicle Travsl<br />
(Billions of vehicle miles)<br />
Mileage Death Flate<br />
(Fatalities<br />
per 1 00,000.000<br />
vehicle miles)<br />
_ 1600 8.0 -<br />
_ 1400<br />
- 1200 6.0 -<br />
- 800<br />
1 Mileage Death Rate<br />
T A<br />
\- l^{<br />
\<br />
Motor Vehicle Travel<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
NHTSA<br />
GoalI<br />
- 600 3.O -<br />
- 400 2,0 -<br />
- 200 1.0 -<br />
1 955 1 965 1 970 1 975 r 980<br />
NOTE: lmprovEmentsinvehicles,roadr,andsafetyofoperationhavereducedthedeathratepBrmile<br />
of travel by ffiore than 43 percent since 1957, The decline in the mileage death rate means that<br />
it is r'low pcssible to travel almost 18,000 milBs aI the sdme risk that wa$ attsined in driving<br />
10.000 miles in 1957.<br />
Figure A-1. Trends in Vehlcle Mileage and Mlleage Death Rate, 1957-1977<br />
5.0 *<br />
A-5
A.6<br />
q r q<br />
' u t r<br />
t O r f l , ^<br />
Elst<br />
= i q<br />
< F : <<br />
E > E E<br />
Srt<br />
,^ 6+<br />
il<br />
d<br />
(tt<br />
o<br />
J<br />
I**o s<br />
lE=e;<br />
E;"de E<br />
*t$<br />
rtF<br />
c\l +<br />
r N<br />
(o(\<br />
(o+<br />
Nrs<br />
cit N<br />
gr+<br />
(al<br />
t: s+<br />
tr<br />
s<br />
q<br />
:)<br />
's b<br />
o<br />
E 8<br />
h F<br />
s E<br />
E $<br />
c d :<br />
d F q<br />
E o o<br />
uIg<br />
=<br />
Eer<br />
d F<br />
q<br />
(o<br />
1+<br />
P E<br />
s g<br />
r F<br />
F.q o<br />
or "r<br />
Glt<br />
F<br />
o-r F<br />
I F<br />
E :<br />
= q<br />
O<br />
F5 d'<br />
E ' E . ; H<br />
9 l o : H o<br />
E BFE ot<br />
h r i t E<br />
P E E B E<br />
= s:T r--<br />
fl #e: H<br />
# E-tl<br />
; tEE ot<br />
E . E 3 e E<br />
E fr;,i 6<br />
i HHE i^<br />
S i 6 Y o<br />
,F *.Ei .E<br />
- r d F<br />
E H : E E<br />
E;HE E<br />
-o si+ E O<br />
S EilE =<br />
F ? € E E<br />
tr H.{i* F<br />
E;+* +<br />
r rr*<br />
j '=<br />
I - o E E<br />
.il F'(o E<br />
.E l-. I r<br />
E H+; g<br />
,f 5Ef €<br />
=s c,<br />
. . {<br />
r t E<br />
e . a lr
E<br />
T o q<br />
q i ' o<br />
**Hd<br />
# F j . q<br />
= - 6<br />
< r - l 4<br />
E > Z E<br />
c9 r,i I<br />
q<br />
E<br />
F;"qq T<br />
en*-o?cu e<br />
d z N * t i ;<br />
- F ; ; 1 ; L i<br />
crUeEE ci<br />
r<br />
{<br />
ritr<br />
j T +<br />
N<br />
+<br />
z,<br />
z<br />
w<br />
F C olq{<br />
E dt+<br />
(\<br />
q<br />
+<br />
ro<br />
N<br />
(r,<br />
,1<br />
l<br />
. Q<br />
s<br />
{<br />
!c<br />
a<br />
{<br />
{<br />
o<br />
E E<br />
E b<br />
t r +<br />
E A<br />
o q<br />
o h<br />
A o q<br />
E o i ' i<br />
- o o o<br />
O o ( s<br />
uut<br />
O *it<br />
. ( o<br />
l\<br />
P E<br />
i e<br />
i o *<br />
l o<br />
! E t<br />
, i B E<br />
E g T E<br />
EE E (J<br />
gi fl +<br />
6.9 = tr<br />
.1 tr E. O<br />
P€ +f; H<br />
E{ci =,;<br />
o'<br />
RFE lq E<br />
# i : * = E 6<br />
i =.e F; ls<br />
i J I<br />
i = Q<br />
F ><br />
= L<br />
| \<br />
a t t<br />
!{ "';o a -<br />
t i gF V 3 L ; = J<br />
EtP Ht<br />
d<br />
F<br />
,iF-o- =3 -E<br />
i*T EI E<br />
6 E i l 4 S o<br />
;fi; EE E<br />
EB,,S EE i<br />
:!; Hr o<br />
frEfl N.5 E<br />
F'6 iJ l" E-' E<br />
E E : S E S<br />
l j l o - a F<br />
f # 3 : f b<br />
u H E<br />
r E O<br />
J z a a<br />
g 4 P<br />
. =<br />
ED<br />
, l r<br />
i<br />
.i<br />
l
Percent Increase<br />
-240<br />
- 200<br />
- 120<br />
--80<br />
-40<br />
1 955<br />
Vehicle Miles<br />
of Travel<br />
SOUFICE; Federaf High way Ad mi n istrat io n, H ig h wey Sfat ltfus.<br />
Motor Vehicle<br />
Begistrations<br />
1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />
NOTE: Between 1 957 and the fuel 5hortage ar rhe end of 1 973 there wes a rapid growth<br />
in the use of motor vehicles. Vehicle miles traveled increased faster then the<br />
number of vehicles, and both increased faster than the number of drivers. Thus,<br />
travel per vehicle, travel per driver, and vehicles per driver increased throughout<br />
the period,<br />
Figure A'4. Trends In Motor Vehicle Regi$trations, Licensed Drivers and<br />
Vehfcfe Miles of Travet. lglt-lgt7
Q<br />
o<br />
(E<br />
u,<br />
tt o<br />
= tr<br />
5<br />
o<br />
.E<br />
.E ah<br />
(E<br />
(l)<br />
o<br />
.9<br />
IE<br />
l= ctt<br />
-tr ri.<br />
.q) iE)<br />
>gt<br />
9n;<br />
orD<br />
r Ctt<br />
=<br />
o<br />
Il<br />
{ .D<br />
.g<br />
.g<br />
(g<br />
tn<br />
.g<br />
.h<br />
(g<br />
dl<br />
i<br />
4 g<br />
E (E<br />
U<br />
Ctt<br />
(o<br />
t*<br />
('r<br />
lo<br />
ttt<br />
t<br />
6'<br />
(n<br />
ot<br />
gr<br />
(',<br />
a,<br />
6,<br />
s<br />
co<br />
cD<br />
(o<br />
ot<br />
t*<br />
ro<br />
ar,<br />
E<br />
o<br />
g<br />
@ O J d ) O<br />
F G ' @ C O F<br />
G- +- $- -. O,<br />
r N<br />
q<br />
o 6 t r o ( o o<br />
c { o ( ? J l f +<br />
rrr t- +, .1 f,t<br />
lJ, e!<br />
q<br />
6 6 r @<br />
e { ( Y t s O o )<br />
u r ( t c f r N<br />
t ' - ' - d -<br />
( o ( f J o r s q<br />
c r ) c o s 6<br />
N C'l ('{<br />
r n J - N -<br />
t<br />
N F C ' 6 T O<br />
s o q )<br />
o-<br />
r f N<br />
ro<br />
6 r l l ( I ) N t<br />
E O ( o N C D C D<br />
r.fr.<br />
l t N<br />
ut<br />
c ! + r , ) N +<br />
{ o G ( o S<br />
r.o o<br />
N N<br />
r<br />
c{<br />
(o.<br />
N<br />
lf}<br />
(f,<br />
6<br />
m<br />
6<br />
u)<br />
N<br />
r<br />
c'j<br />
o{<br />
r<br />
o 6<br />
N<br />
fo<br />
l f N C D 6<br />
o<br />
' - a q a<br />
Gr lf + t)<br />
( o 8 0 0<br />
-' -' N -<br />
o o s f<br />
e{ C,l d) tO<br />
( o o t 6 f l<br />
( o c o r ( f J<br />
6r O, O)- O-<br />
r ( o N ( t )<br />
t r o ,<br />
t o ( o r , r<br />
o<br />
N<br />
o<br />
O c '<br />
o<br />
E n = 5 -<br />
= - -<br />
E E F c 5<br />
i " . J<br />
Fg o iD g<br />
: o<br />
.o><br />
:<br />
Z<br />
x ><br />
;i<br />
.-<br />
^ - n<br />
o -<br />
v 1E E ; H<br />
T E: !- E F<br />
O u = a O , =<br />
O Eg (E (E J<br />
l J t N r r<br />
( \ o o r r )<br />
ri e.i Gi +<br />
i 5 N ( 4<br />
( 4 F ( O<br />
N T N O )<br />
r j - - r j<br />
1., N c,l<br />
r o c o o J<br />
( f r e { @ f i<br />
r ; c J o +<br />
s N f o<br />
(\r o co (f,<br />
l r ' 6 0 0<br />
n t c " j - d<br />
s e { f l t<br />
r o r<br />
6 r +<br />
r - r t s<br />
+ N t<br />
N T N O<br />
( f , 6 N<br />
+ + d d<br />
t c { t<br />
{ r c o f t<br />
+ t o t<br />
+ ,ri rt rrt<br />
+ N S<br />
C { N E O<br />
r C.J CD<br />
+ F , r t r<br />
t N +<br />
c { | J t o r s<br />
q o q q q<br />
6 0 r ( o o ,<br />
q N s<br />
r o t + N<br />
+ o<br />
r t ; c i o<br />
| l ' N 6<br />
tl, a tD<br />
c ! c ? q :<br />
6 r t o '<br />
6 N g<br />
r f r c O<br />
r ( o b m<br />
r o + @<br />
s N r f<br />
3 -<br />
6 =<br />
E + :<br />
. . . = o ! l<br />
; € p 9<br />
.F<br />
E F ! d o<br />
= t 0 p<br />
' T F E E H<br />
- . = 4 E c<br />
6 6 Y<br />
f , € a a . ! l<br />
i i e ( E ( t J<br />
E o o o<br />
g P P P<br />
: P E P<br />
;<br />
b b b E<br />
. L L L 6 -<br />
6 o )<br />
o ( o<br />
- o<br />
r<br />
F<br />
(o<br />
( o l r }<br />
- o<br />
s<br />
H<br />
(o<br />
o<br />
N<br />
o,<br />
ro<br />
o<br />
c ! ( o<br />
q ' 4 o<br />
ro<br />
6<br />
o<br />
6<br />
O<br />
( D N<br />
o ' 6<br />
d o<br />
o ) s<br />
6 0 1<br />
@ s<br />
c i o<br />
o o<br />
o d<br />
6 = =<br />
f, E h h<br />
. c E ; j<br />
T E E b<br />
tr<br />
X 4 X d<br />
E s: f;+<br />
i g'O 9-,d<br />
. a - o<br />
F Il ;-A<br />
s,Y a a<br />
. o<br />
I<br />
I '<br />
d ; o<br />
E ;E g<br />
E; 2= E-'<br />
o 4 m :<br />
tsE :T E<br />
*<br />
93<br />
:<br />
ip.!<br />
B E J<br />
{* rt e<br />
r t i ; > E<br />
b > P= -.<br />
O € F E ;<br />
q o = o x<br />
E o : i 6 o<br />
'-;5 h: g<br />
8 E E 3 E i<br />
E5.,i frE r<br />
H : F E ' 9<br />
r::.: * i 0<br />
Eili:<br />
i l i F E<br />
+Ed 6<br />
E.E 6<br />
e b T<br />
Er g<br />
- \ c i;<br />
E(;g e<br />
q*<br />
'"-o t<br />
g<br />
; ? r ^<br />
Eii i Er i<br />
G * -<br />
i x m > a o T<br />
I{E I --.: H<br />
E3F.: ;T E<br />
gEF i 6* s<br />
; i * ; E * o I<br />
;B E<br />
md.E<br />
r' Ef :<br />
,, E- i<br />
5r-s 5 iE il<br />
i - F > : - C<br />
Eut; 3s H<br />
il€fr i sa F<br />
6(5t i ;o i<br />
:=@ i .SB S<br />
ii# p E+ E<br />
rf E F u E: E<br />
; - F o ' a l 3<br />
-<br />
esat H t*g<br />
e i J r ( ) + P F<br />
f *ou* EF: € ;E;<br />
F = 9o 9<br />
i G e q "<br />
- g E<br />
,, E C ;; ' =Y r<br />
E99 s, S E: B<br />
- E E P = * 9 c<br />
E z z : 6 t " E<br />
,{f f H i i! E<br />
:PP:: EE i<br />
F+o i ! o,: F<br />
; d r ' = r<br />
SP35co = fi<br />
!<br />
8<br />
9<br />
E<br />
-<br />
. .<br />
6<br />
U<br />
? L<br />
,:'i c( sJ<br />
F<br />
t<br />
r<br />
'<br />
H<br />
^ h<br />
Z<br />
A-9<br />
:!<br />
r<br />
:!
A.t0<br />
Year<br />
1557<br />
1 958<br />
1 959<br />
I 960<br />
1961<br />
1 962<br />
r 963<br />
1964<br />
I 965<br />
1 966<br />
1 967<br />
1968<br />
1 969<br />
1 970<br />
197 1<br />
1972<br />
1 973<br />
1974<br />
1975<br />
1 976<br />
1977E<br />
Table A-2. Basic Data Pertaining to Motor vehicle Traffic Accldents.<br />
United States, 1957-1977<br />
Resid€nt<br />
Population<br />
(thousandsl<br />
171<br />
,187<br />
't74,149<br />
177,135<br />
179,979<br />
182,552<br />
185,771<br />
188,483<br />
1g 1,141<br />
193.526<br />
195,576<br />
157,467<br />
199,399<br />
201,385<br />
203,810<br />
206,212<br />
208,230<br />
209.844<br />
21 1,390<br />
213,124<br />
214,649<br />
216.332<br />
Licensed<br />
Drivers<br />
(thousands)<br />
79.631<br />
81,537<br />
84.498<br />
87,253<br />
BB,7 44<br />
90,588<br />
93,573<br />
95,468<br />
98,502<br />
100,998<br />
103,172<br />
105,410<br />
r 08,306<br />
1 1 1,543<br />
114,426<br />
118,414<br />
121,546<br />
125,427<br />
129,791<br />
134,036<br />
r 37,901<br />
Registered<br />
Motor<br />
Vehiqles<br />
(thousandsl<br />
67,5S5<br />
68.818<br />
71 ,919<br />
74,432<br />
76,557<br />
79,811<br />
83,484<br />
87,299<br />
91,740<br />
95,703<br />
98,859<br />
102,587<br />
107,412<br />
111,242<br />
116,330<br />
122,557<br />
130,025<br />
134,900<br />
137,926<br />
143,538<br />
148.880<br />
Vehicle<br />
Miles<br />
Traveled<br />
(billionsl<br />
647<br />
665<br />
700<br />
719<br />
738<br />
767<br />
805<br />
847<br />
888<br />
928<br />
966<br />
1,020<br />
1,066<br />
1 ,'t 14<br />
1,1 84<br />
1,265<br />
1,317<br />
1.283<br />
1,331<br />
r,409<br />
r,466<br />
Traffic<br />
Deaths<br />
36,S32<br />
35,331<br />
36,223<br />
36,399<br />
36,285<br />
38.980<br />
41,723<br />
45,645<br />
47,089<br />
50,8S4<br />
50,724<br />
52,725<br />
s3,543<br />
52,627<br />
52,542<br />
54,589<br />
54.052<br />
45,1 96<br />
44,525<br />
45,523<br />
47,671<br />
sources: vehicle Travel, Registered vehicfes and Licensed Drivers from Federal Highway<br />
Adrninisrratiofl<br />
. Highway Statistics Division<br />
Mileage<br />
Death Rate<br />
(Deaths per<br />
Hundred-Million<br />
Vehicle Milesl<br />
5.71<br />
5.32<br />
8.17<br />
5.06<br />
4.S2<br />
5.08<br />
5,18<br />
5.39<br />
5.30<br />
5.48<br />
5.25<br />
8.17<br />
5.02<br />
4.72<br />
4.44<br />
4.32<br />
4.11<br />
3.52<br />
3.35<br />
3,23<br />
3.25<br />
Population trom U.S. Bureau of the Census<br />
Traff ic Deaths: 1557'1914, f rom National Center for Health Statistics, HEW and State<br />
Accident Summaries (Adjusted to 30 Day Traffic Deaths).<br />
1975'1977 , from Fatar Accident Reporting system (30 Dav Traffic Deathsl.<br />
E - Estinreted.
tr<br />
o<br />
E<br />
u,<br />
ED<br />
o<br />
IE<br />
o<br />
(,<br />
E o,<br />
o<br />
E<br />
E<br />
TI<br />
tr<br />
cl<br />
tr<br />
o<br />
(g<br />
=<br />
a.<br />
o<br />
o-<br />
.S<br />
t<br />
E e<br />
(5<br />
a:,<br />
{ o<br />
lt cl<br />
E $+<br />
FIH<br />
13<br />
ctt<br />
fi He<br />
s!$<br />
E=sH<br />
ipflE<br />
gEEE<br />
{<br />
ro<br />
ctt<br />
€(lI<br />
ctr<br />
t \ I F | \ f l<br />
F tit
h<br />
gt<br />
I<br />
IlI<br />
g,<br />
ot<br />
CL<br />
}\<br />
>\<br />
-ct<br />
o<br />
.g<br />
.E(E<br />
(q<br />
l!<br />
.g<br />
E<br />
F<br />
g<br />
.g<br />
g)<br />
o<br />
o<br />
E<br />
o<br />
tr<br />
.9 =<br />
4l<br />
.9<br />
6<br />
TT<br />
tr<br />
(g<br />
o<br />
.cl<br />
E<br />
z<br />
T<br />
{<br />
e-ct<br />
G<br />
A-12<br />
+<br />
o<br />
t<br />
o<br />
*<br />
E<br />
o<br />
T'<br />
rlJ<br />
o-<br />
.? C'<br />
tJ<br />
o<br />
o<br />
E<br />
|J<br />
F<br />
o<br />
iE<br />
(E<br />
o<br />
(E<br />
o<br />
tr<br />
{,<br />
o<br />
dr<br />
A<br />
o<br />
E<br />
z<br />
tr<br />
o(,<br />
o<br />
4<br />
o<br />
4<br />
E<br />
z<br />
E o(,<br />
o<br />
4<br />
@<br />
-a E<br />
z<br />
c<br />
s<br />
(t,<br />
4<br />
o<br />
ll<br />
z,<br />
c<br />
(J<br />
d)<br />
o-<br />
s FJ<br />
z<br />
N Ot - F F fi LO (f, (O e! (o O F (\ O m (\t (O - O (f<br />
oe t e? q e-i r-- u? q q q'r'l a? q q q \ q u'l \ q q<br />
((' (O (c| (c} r\ r- CO CO cO F* r\ cO co r\ (l' tf, Lc) (r? O? \f Co<br />
l\ l-. F t-. l*- F t\ r\ t-. F* r\ r\ F r\ I\ F- r\ r\ l\ |\ F<br />
N - C? E) |rt O tYt lf,t O) El tl tO CO F (\ o) N (O i\ O Q<br />
F Ct - o * -<br />
-F - - 6.!<br />
EEESSe<br />
b ; s ' . * F<br />
) o : > : i<br />
E+i=r*€H<br />
' I r X l o 1 9<br />
-EgE:8f,<br />
EE."g<br />
Ei;<br />
fiE#E;€E<br />
,il- i<br />
an<br />
ll,<br />
F<br />
o z
Ir<br />
4l<br />
o<br />
.E<br />
.E<br />
|6<br />
(E<br />
lr<br />
.g<br />
(E<br />
te<br />
.g<br />
E<br />
st\<br />
bP<br />
H'r<br />
=t\<br />
= ttt<br />
- ctt<br />
bF<br />
o=rEo<br />
Ep<br />
€E<br />
E{<br />
oE<br />
E -<br />
.E.E<br />
(EO<br />
:- EL<br />
=!r<br />
5:F<br />
a-<br />
T'<br />
E<br />
r!<br />
s EI<br />
z tri<br />
t<br />
e3l<br />
(E<br />
F<br />
o<br />
o<br />
* tr<br />
,g<br />
q,<br />
TI s<br />
a<br />
.!<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
E<br />
.!<br />
o<br />
o<br />
i5<br />
-c<br />
g<br />
o<br />
(E<br />
o<br />
F<br />
+<br />
F<br />
(E<br />
€ Ea<br />
t<br />
d<br />
tq<br />
fE<br />
o<br />
lt tr<br />
z<br />
G<br />
E<br />
0<br />
E<br />
z<br />
*<br />
't tu<br />
G<br />
E<br />
s<br />
E<br />
z<br />
e<br />
e<br />
E,<br />
o<br />
s E<br />
z<br />
= 6<br />
:i .c)<br />
f *o.<br />
-;^*o<br />
( E =<br />
E s<br />
rSF Or(frdltf)(r)-COtf(oF-l$0COClft<br />
ul'4 q? u? c? o? a? q e : o? t q o, c? q q r: q t .:<br />
(o rr ro Lo [r) (O t* € cD O cr) c) O 6) o) OJ O, |.l, $, lil (o<br />
F F F c . ' l - N c ! - - F F F<br />
c\J r cvl or r$ c' crJ r, dl, \t { rlt r, r-- e{ o) cal (tr} F.. o o<br />
f-- (f, S O - O r ts u:, O + 6 r$ Ct rn (o C\t
A-14<br />
Deaths(thousands)<br />
-50<br />
_40<br />
-20<br />
-10<br />
I 955<br />
i l<br />
SOUBCES: Deaths:<br />
Deaths<br />
- 4000<br />
- 3500<br />
- 3000<br />
- 2s00<br />
- 2000<br />
-1500<br />
- 1000<br />
- 500<br />
- - - d<br />
at'<br />
I Pedestrians<br />
l t l r l<br />
1 960 1 S65 1 970 1975 1980<br />
1957-1974, E$timated by NHT$A from data supplied by Nationsl Center for<br />
Health Statistics, HEW and State Accident Summaries (adiusted<br />
to 30 dav deaths).<br />
1975-1977, NHTSA Fatal Accident Reporting System.<br />
Figure A"5. Pedestrian and Motor Vehicle Occupant Fatalities. 1957-1977<br />
r 955<br />
i r f i r - J d<br />
l t<br />
- - l<br />
1 970 1 975<br />
Flgure A.6. Motorcycle and Bicycle Fatallties, 1957-1977
Number of Fatalities<br />
per Hour<br />
-16<br />
# 12<br />
-8<br />
-4<br />
-0<br />
t t t l r r<br />
t t t r<br />
r l t l l l l l l<br />
EEEEE E EE EE E EEE EEFEE EqE EE<br />
(O F cO o) Q F 61 - ot (Q
A-16<br />
Mileage Death Rate<br />
- 5.0<br />
- 4.8<br />
-4<br />
- 4.2<br />
- 3.8<br />
- 3.6<br />
- 3.4<br />
- 3.2<br />
- 3.0<br />
- 2.8<br />
- 2.6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec<br />
SOURCE: Miledge data supplied by Federal Highway Administration,<br />
NOTE: Thegraphforl9T3,whencomparedtol9-l2,illustratesthegeneral trendof annual<br />
rerluction since the Highway Sefetv Act of 1966. The sharp drop that occurred at<br />
the end of 1973 6nd continued through 1977 also reflects the chanqe in automobile<br />
use resulting from the energy crisis.<br />
Figure A.8. Monthly Death Rates,lor 1972,1973, and 1977
-20<br />
,//<br />
Deaths per 100,000 Registered Vehicles<br />
t---<br />
, t l<br />
Deaths per 100,000<br />
Licensed Drivers<br />
-.1'+.1'<br />
Deaths per 100,000 Fesident Population<br />
I<br />
.l<br />
\.1-.:-.<br />
1955 1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />
SOUHCES: D6eths: 1957-1974, National Center for Hgdlth StEtistica and State Accident Summaries<br />
(adjusted to 30 day traffic deaths) ; 1915-1977, National Highway Traf{ic Saf ety Administration,<br />
The Fatal Accident Fleporting System.<br />
Vehicle travel, registered vehicles. and licensed drivers: Federal Highway Administrgtion<br />
Highway Statistics Divlsion.<br />
Pooulation: Burssu 61 the Censui.<br />
NOTE: From 1966 to 1973, deaths per registered vehicle and licensed driver have con$istently<br />
decreased while deaths per population have remained fairly constant. The reductions<br />
from 1974to 1977 mey be attributed largely to the speed limit.<br />
Figure A.9. Trend in Molor Vehlcle Death Rate$, lgSZ-1977<br />
A-17<br />
i<br />
I<br />
,l
A-18<br />
Ratio<br />
- 1.2<br />
F 1.0<br />
- 0.6<br />
- 0.4<br />
- 0.2<br />
Registered Vehicles<br />
Driver Licenses<br />
Registered Vehicles<br />
Population<br />
SOURCES: Registered VehiclesEnd Licensed Drivers: FHWA, Highway Statistics Division.<br />
Pooulation: Bureau of the Census,<br />
'<br />
NOTE: This chart illustrates the relative increasB in motot vehicles compared to drivers and the<br />
relative population, In 1 957 there were two vehicles for every 5 persons in the United<br />
StatesandmorethanEdriversforevery4vehicles, Inl9TTtherewere2vehiclesfor<br />
every 3 persons and more vehicles than drivers.<br />
Figure A-10. Trend ln Rallos ol Registerod Vehicles to Drivers<br />
and Population, 1957-1977
Table A-6. Types ol Motor Vehicles Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1g75-tgz6<br />
Type of Vshicla<br />
Passenger<br />
Car<br />
Motorcycle<br />
Commercial Bus<br />
School Bus<br />
Single-Unit Truck<br />
Pickup and Van<br />
Other S.U. Truck<br />
Multi-Unit Truck<br />
Other<br />
Percent of All<br />
Vehidor Regirtered<br />
Percent of All Vehicles<br />
in Fatal Accidsnti<br />
1975 1976 1 S75 1 976<br />
77.4<br />
3.6<br />
0.1<br />
0.2<br />
17.9<br />
0.8<br />
76.9<br />
SOURCE: Accident dats: NHTSA Fat8l Accident Reporting Syrtem<br />
Rdgi$trstion dStE; BEsd on preliminary 6stim6t6s frofl the Federal Highway Administrstion<br />
NOTE: Motorcycles and heavy trucks Ere over'represented in fatal accidents. The weight of truckr maket<br />
them e$pecially lethal in highwEy Eccidents while motorcyctists Ere extremely vulnerablo to iniury.<br />
3.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
':u<br />
0.8<br />
69.0<br />
5.9<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
1s.6<br />
fi 3.7)<br />
(1.e)<br />
5.2<br />
3.7<br />
67.4<br />
6.0<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
r6.8<br />
( r 4.8)<br />
(2.0)<br />
Tabfe 47. Compdeon of Number of Mll€B Tr:awled Annually by Type ol Vehicle, 1975-f 976<br />
Typr of Vrhicls<br />
Passenger Cars<br />
Motorcycles<br />
Commercial Buses<br />
School Buses<br />
Single-Unit Trucks<br />
Multi-Unit Trucks<br />
All Motor Vehicles<br />
'Millions of whicl6 firil6s.<br />
6.1<br />
3.2<br />
Total Travel* Average Annual Travel Per Vehicle<br />
ts75 1976 % Change 1975 1976 % Change<br />
1,028,121<br />
22,351<br />
?.648<br />
2,500<br />
218,894<br />
55,560<br />
1,330.074<br />
r,074,000<br />
22,452<br />
?.899<br />
2,862<br />
247,895<br />
59,055<br />
I,40S, r 63<br />
SOURCE; Federal Highway Adminidtration lPreliminarv Ectimates).<br />
+4,46<br />
+0.45<br />
+9.48<br />
+14.48<br />
+13.25<br />
+6.29<br />
+S,95<br />
9,634<br />
4,500<br />
28,230<br />
6,788<br />
8.882<br />
49,1?5<br />
9.644<br />
9,733<br />
4,500<br />
29,948<br />
7,502<br />
9,355<br />
48,366<br />
9,81 7<br />
+1,02<br />
+6.09<br />
+ 10.52<br />
NOTE: Except for motorcycles and multi-unit trucks, the average travel per vehicle has increased. The growth in the<br />
number of vehicles has resulted in sn almost six percent increase in total mile$ traveled.<br />
+5,33<br />
- 1.55<br />
+1<br />
.79<br />
A-19
A-20<br />
Vehilcle Miles (hillionsl<br />
- 1600<br />
- 1400<br />
-1200<br />
- t0o0<br />
- 80o<br />
- 600<br />
- 400<br />
- 200<br />
Rural - -'<br />
SOUFICF: Federal Highway Administration,<br />
NOTE: tn recent years, travel in urban areas has been increasing slightly faster than travel in rur€l<br />
areas" This is due primarily to increased local and municipal road mileage caused by suburban<br />
development.<br />
There has been a steady increase in vehicle miles traveled except in 1974.<br />
Ffgure A.11. Total Motor Vehicle Travel, 1gi7-1gll
VehicleMiles (billions)<br />
-1600<br />
- 1400<br />
- 1?00<br />
- 10oo<br />
- 600<br />
- 400<br />
Fural l-l<br />
Urban<br />
[-l<br />
1 97 1 1972<br />
$OURCE: Federal Highway Administration,<br />
Totat Eil<br />
1 973 1 974 1 975 1 976<br />
Figure A.12. Motor Vehicle Travel on All Highway $ystems, 1g7i-i9Z6
A-22<br />
Vehicle Miles (billions)<br />
- 250'-* Rural fl Urban<br />
filn Total W<br />
- 200<br />
- 150<br />
- 100<br />
-_50<br />
1971 1972 I 973 1574 1 975 1 976<br />
SOURCE: Federal Highway Administration.<br />
NOTE: Interstate Highway System is synonymou$ with the Federal Highway Administration<br />
categories Interstete (,Arterial) and Interstate (finat).<br />
Figure A-13. Motor Vehicle Travel on. the Inler$tate Highway System, 1971-1976<br />
Vehicle Miles (billions)<br />
-1zoo Rural l-l Urban ffiil,'ll Total<br />
SOURCE: Federal Highway Administretion'<br />
Figure A-14. Motor Vehicle Travel on Non-lnterstate Highway Systems, 1971-1976
Speed (mph)<br />
-58<br />
_56<br />
1960 1965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />
$OURCE; Computed from data supplied by the Federal Highwey Admlnlstration.<br />
NOTE: Over the 1 O years from 1963-73, the average speed of vehicles on the rural IntBrstate<br />
System increa$ed more than I percent. A corresponding increase in crash speeds<br />
occurred. This has been a significant factor in the rise in highway deaths, because<br />
high crash speeds increase the chance that a fatality will occur. ln 1974 the average<br />
speed dropped 1 1 percent balow that of 1 973. During this same period, traffic<br />
fatalities dropped 1 6 percent. Since 1 975. the average speed has increased slightly<br />
but it is still well below the 1973 average speed.<br />
Flgure A-15. Average Free.Movlng Travel Speed on the Rural Interstate System, 1960-1977<br />
A-23<br />
I )<br />
;<br />
' l
E o<br />
FJ<br />
ctr<br />
I<br />
CD<br />
ctt<br />
ci<br />
=<br />
e<br />
(5<br />
o<br />
rto<br />
>'P<br />
.ct -^<br />
o<br />
o<br />
tt ooE0t<br />
.g<br />
d<br />
-t<br />
g .El<br />
(E<br />
F<br />
A-24<br />
uol<br />
>tD<br />
o<br />
E b<br />
g (l,<br />
o<br />
€<br />
gl<br />
rr.,<br />
b<br />
ro<br />
t<br />
lo<br />
c<br />
rjt<br />
qr<br />
Ef<br />
ro<br />
rt<br />
+<br />
t<br />
+<br />
6r<br />
(et<br />
b<br />
o<br />
rl<br />
fq<br />
Q<br />
aYt<br />
ot<br />
t.f,<br />
+<br />
o<br />
CE<br />
u A C<br />
= N<br />
l<br />
+ff<br />
P rolR ,f,:€ flH ;H RH gs<br />
Rq tf, Ec E'r? B- S6? Fio N:l N:, m-: q<br />
;'i ;'P ['o f,'o o'o ;'co ;'co o'cc o'r cl'r 9' -<br />
fis Hs FH frS ES Hd H* s* EH P* 3S<br />
EE:.E:.; E;; =-H 3-;3-;:.;:.;:-; r-o<br />
HE HS Hd EF otEE |:ER *EE flH<br />
=? si B= H: 5.: u.* Hi_= ii.= SS u.= E* ii.: ES o.d'o,<br />
o(}) d'o) d's c|'ot -',, oi= Fi= o= +H nts<br />
HE H{ E+ ;$ F$ E$ Hi! Hi; F$ HH Hf<br />
:'9 -. = i'= fi'= i.''<br />
= i'= ;'l . l ."'l r : e':<br />
*Be PEe Hle Hre Pf =+* PEe 8S SH 3H frH<br />
H+ Ht H": Hc] F,i.: H.: :.: id-H d,H iH [";<br />
;3 ;': o'I
Total Licensed Drivers - 137,901,000<br />
9 9 6 , r t A q o r E o r v g ) o )<br />
C { C \ r f \ r c ' l f / ) S S r o r l t t p ( b 6<br />
h 9 r 5 l + r 5 - r o r r , d $ , d d r * ;<br />
d $ l ( \ l c ' r C ' ) + = l r l t f l ( D o g<br />
€ o<br />
Age Group<br />
Figure A-16. Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />
A.25
A-26<br />
-80<br />
-60<br />
-40<br />
-20<br />
Percent<br />
o r f c D t o r r q l<br />
(\/ (\t o{ (Y, cc tl<br />
- L d , i r d , i a<br />
t $ r ( \ r ( Y ) f i l t<br />
f<br />
o ) E t o r t 6 ,<br />
q r I ) t . f ) ( o ( o<br />
u 5 d u 5 o r r )<br />
!l ro ro (o (o<br />
Age Group<br />
o)<br />
( o j j<br />
r O<br />
6J t-<br />
NOTE: Change in the age distribution of licensed drivers is an important element of the highway<br />
safety problem. In recent years, the lergest increases have occurred in those ege groups<br />
where accident rates have been higher than average,<br />
During the period there wa$ I v6ry large increase (1O2 percent) in the number of licenses<br />
issued to women over 59" This is believed to reflect the tremendous increase in driving by<br />
women that took place between World War I and World War ll. In the decade from 1967<br />
to 1977,the young licensed drivers (under 30) and the old (over 59) increased much more<br />
rapidly than those in the middle group (30 to 59), The increase was 50 percent in the<br />
under-3O group and 58 percent in the over-S9 group, but only 19 percont in the 30-59<br />
group. There was an increase of 49 percent in the number of license$ issuod to female<br />
drivers, but only 23 percent in the number of licenses issued to male drivers, As a result,<br />
in the eleven Vaer period, the estimated ratio of male to female drivers declined {rom<br />
3:2 to 7:6.<br />
Figure A.17. Percent Increase In Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977
.E (E<br />
E<br />
rJ<br />
h<br />
g,<br />
I<br />
(E'<br />
ct)<br />
d,<br />
=<br />
e<br />
ct<br />
o<br />
,9^<br />
r{O<br />
-o<br />
-6:o^<br />
gE<br />
o<br />
t<br />
o<br />
.Et<br />
o,<br />
o<br />
E<br />
.g<br />
J<br />
oi<br />
t gIl(E<br />
E<br />
Se<br />
o<br />
gt<br />
I E<br />
T<br />
(o<br />
(''<br />
r+<br />
ro<br />
ro<br />
ri<br />
ur<br />
o<br />
ut<br />
ol<br />
T<br />
6<br />
qt<br />
ch<br />
FJ<br />
ln<br />
rf<br />
o<br />
fil<br />
CE<br />
ul<br />
ER<br />
4ffr<br />
aH<br />
o.<br />
l<br />
9, r.<br />
6fi<br />
rrt ><br />
(J<br />
{<br />
HS EH H$ HS HE H* 3H sx R4 Rs 8S<br />
.yi ' Fi,r' ci,', nr; 3'; H-; B; ;-; T'; :-:; se<br />
.d<br />
E+ E* HS Efi Hfi H# E$ EE H€ Hfi E{<br />
N- $<br />
c\j'+ Fa'$ 6i +<br />
N'f N't fl)-
- 15<br />
*10<br />
-60<br />
.-40<br />
+20<br />
- _20<br />
O<br />
rr<br />
S O<br />
(\l<br />
) r<br />
e.t<br />
f<br />
ff)<br />
h<br />
i<br />
o (\l .<br />
(\<br />
b d<br />
or)<br />
o ) f<br />
o ? T<br />
t < r q<br />
f f J q<br />
Male Licensed Drivers - 74,195,000<br />
6,
g<br />
IE<br />
E<br />
o<br />
l|.<br />
FJ<br />
gt<br />
I<br />
CD<br />
ctt<br />
d<br />
=<br />
g<br />
(5<br />
o Eta<br />
- 15<br />
-10<br />
o s 6 j q c ' r<br />
f t + c r T q<br />
! o r . ( ' o l . c t<br />
g N 6 r c D c r )<br />
U '<br />
f<br />
Female Licensed Drivers * 63,706,000<br />
.S oJ rt oJ<br />
9 T + P<br />
o r r J o r . c ,<br />
t q f r . c ' l f )<br />
Age Group<br />
+ o )<br />
(o (s<br />
( ) t r ,<br />
(o (o<br />
Figure A'20. Distribution of Female Llcensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977
R S S S B S + S E 3 E 3 E<br />
h o l f r o 1 6 o t o c t u . r o r f r * . b<br />
f i e . r e . r f r < ' + + r b r r i 6 d g F<br />
c o<br />
f<br />
Age GrouP<br />
Figure A-21. Percent Incr€asa In Female Licensed Drlvers by Age Group, 1S67-1972
Table A-11. Percent Distributlon, By Age, of Drlvers Involved in Fatal Accldents, 19?<br />
Type of Accident<br />
Licensed Drivers<br />
All Fatal Accidents<br />
Single Vehicle:<br />
Overturn in Road<br />
Other Non"collision<br />
Collision w/f ixed Obiect<br />
Multi-Veh icle:<br />
Rear ertd<br />
Head on<br />
Angle<br />
Sideswipe<br />
Pedestrian<br />
Pedalcyclist<br />
Under<br />
20<br />
8,9<br />
18.10<br />
23.81<br />
20.22<br />
?3,48<br />
12.S8<br />
16.43<br />
16.13<br />
16.57<br />
16.67<br />
19.77<br />
Age of Driver<br />
20-?4 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />
13.6<br />
21.43<br />
25.51<br />
22.O4<br />
?5.92<br />
18.r9<br />
20.04<br />
19.24<br />
20.33<br />
20.77<br />
19.77<br />
24.0<br />
23.8S<br />
?4.44<br />
24.t1<br />
22.47<br />
25.48<br />
24.92<br />
22.a8<br />
25.37<br />
26.21<br />
24.52<br />
16.6<br />
1?.80<br />
10.57<br />
13.48<br />
10.15<br />
16,15<br />
13.92<br />
12 94<br />
13.18<br />
13.91<br />
13.74<br />
SOUFCE: Estimated f rom the N HTSA Fatal ,4 ccident Reporting System (FARS)'<br />
14.9<br />
10.01<br />
8.36<br />
9.r1<br />
7.72<br />
12.84<br />
10.73<br />
10 68<br />
11 .17<br />
10.36<br />
10.01<br />
12.3<br />
7.15<br />
4.31<br />
6.19<br />
5.60<br />
8,52<br />
7.87<br />
8.24<br />
7.36<br />
6.88<br />
7.83<br />
NOTE: Drivers under 25 are over.involved in all types of accidents, compared to the total number of<br />
licensed drivers in thar age group. The over-involvement is greatest for single-vehicle accidents,<br />
especially collision with fixed object, overturrted in road and other nontollision. Both male<br />
and female drivers in this age group show the same pattern of over'representdtion Drivers in<br />
age group 35-64 are generally in fewer accidents than would be cxpected on the basis of their<br />
numbers. Drivers over 64 show a mixed pattern. with an over-representation of females and<br />
under-represenlalion of males.<br />
Over<br />
64<br />
9.9<br />
6.37<br />
2.73<br />
2.13<br />
4.36<br />
5.55<br />
5.95<br />
10.49<br />
5.66<br />
4.92<br />
4.24
Type of Accident<br />
Licensed Drivers<br />
All Fatal Accidents<br />
Single Vehicle:<br />
Overturn in Road<br />
Other Non-collision<br />
Coll ision w / lixed Object<br />
Multi-Vehicle;<br />
Rear End<br />
Head On<br />
Angle<br />
Sideswipe<br />
Pedestrian<br />
Pedalcyclist<br />
Table A-12. Percent Distrlbution, By Age, of Male Drlvers<br />
Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />
Under<br />
?o<br />
9.1<br />
18.08<br />
22.90<br />
20.31<br />
23,65<br />
12.67<br />
16.26<br />
16.36<br />
16.16<br />
16.42<br />
r 9.87<br />
Age of Driver<br />
20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />
13,4<br />
21.99<br />
26.30<br />
?2.SS<br />
26.62<br />
18.67<br />
20.65<br />
19.83<br />
1 9.76<br />
20.57<br />
21.32<br />
23.4<br />
24.35<br />
24.60<br />
23.66<br />
22.79<br />
25.71<br />
25.66<br />
22.63<br />
26.97<br />
26.51<br />
24.O7<br />
16.0<br />
12.61<br />
10.60<br />
13.62<br />
9.88<br />
16.13<br />
13.69<br />
12.62<br />
13.30<br />
13.92<br />
13.25<br />
SOURCE; Estimated from the NHTSA Fata! Accident Reporting Wstem (FARfl.<br />
14.8<br />
LC?<br />
8.30<br />
s.38<br />
7.49<br />
12_99<br />
10.50<br />
10.66<br />
11 .44<br />
'10.47<br />
s.85<br />
12.5<br />
6.78<br />
4.33<br />
6.47<br />
5.31<br />
8.20<br />
7.16<br />
7.69<br />
8.71<br />
7.14<br />
7.59<br />
Over<br />
64<br />
I 1.0<br />
6.06<br />
2.6S<br />
2.S0<br />
3.96<br />
5.31<br />
6.97<br />
10.00<br />
8.22<br />
4.82<br />
3.88<br />
A.33
A-34<br />
Table A-13. Percent Distrlbutlon, By Age, of Female Drivers<br />
Involved in Fatal Accidents. 1977<br />
Type of Accident<br />
Licensed Drivers<br />
All Fatal Accidents<br />
Single Vehicle:<br />
Overturn in Road<br />
Other Non-collision<br />
Coll ision w/f ixed Object<br />
Multi-Veh icle;<br />
Rear end<br />
Head on<br />
Angle<br />
Sideswipe<br />
Pedestrian<br />
Peda lcyclist<br />
Undsr<br />
20<br />
8.7<br />
18.20<br />
28.62<br />
19.79<br />
22.50<br />
14,80<br />
17.18<br />
15.29<br />
18.56<br />
17.80<br />
19.38<br />
Age of Driver<br />
20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />
13.8<br />
18.96<br />
21.46<br />
18.75<br />
?1.76<br />
15.30<br />
17.55<br />
17.04<br />
23.05<br />
21.81<br />
13.75<br />
24.8<br />
21.89<br />
23.64<br />
31.25<br />
20.s9<br />
?4.1 I<br />
21.90<br />
20,05<br />
17.66<br />
25.1 6<br />
26.25<br />
16.9<br />
13.65<br />
14.42<br />
r 3.54<br />
11.76<br />
16.28<br />
14.86<br />
14.16<br />
12.57<br />
13.89<br />
15.63<br />
SOURCE: Estimated from the NHTSA Fatal Accident Reporting Systam (FAFfl,<br />
15.1<br />
1Q,44<br />
8.55<br />
8.33<br />
9.12<br />
12.0r<br />
11 .67<br />
10.71<br />
9.88<br />
9.97<br />
r 0.63<br />
12.1<br />
8.S2<br />
4.20<br />
5.21<br />
7.28<br />
10,36<br />
10.83<br />
10.33<br />
10.48<br />
5.87<br />
8.75<br />
Over<br />
64<br />
8.7<br />
7.81<br />
2.95<br />
2,08<br />
6.76<br />
6.91<br />
5.88<br />
12.32<br />
7.78<br />
5.41<br />
5.63
lndustrial Production Index<br />
1967 = 100<br />
- 10o<br />
-90<br />
-80<br />
-50<br />
Traffic Deaths<br />
(thousands)<br />
t l r l l l<br />
1955 1960 r 965 I 970 1 975 1 980<br />
SOURCES; Federal Fleserve Board<br />
Dearhs: 195(}1974, National Center for Health Statistica.<br />
1975 and 1 976, Fatal Accident Reporting System.<br />
NOTE; From 1957 to 1966 the annual changes in highway fatalities have correspondsd closely<br />
with change$ in the Fed€ral Reserv€ Board lndustrial Production Index. Clearly both<br />
trends have many common ceusative factors. Beginning in 1967, however, the rate of<br />
increase in highway deaths has fallen behind that of the Industrial Index, although simi-<br />
' larities in the two trends are still apparent.<br />
Figure A-22. Comparison ol Tralllc Deathe and lndustrlel Productlon Index,<br />
u.s.. 19s7-1977<br />
62-<br />
57-<br />
52-<br />
42-<br />
32-<br />
A-35
A.36<br />
Table A-14. Safety Belt Percent Usage<br />
'197<br />
4-1977 Passenger Cars<br />
Usage by Model Year and Car Size<br />
Size 1S76.1977<br />
Subcompact<br />
Compact<br />
Intermediate<br />
Standard<br />
Luxury<br />
32.8<br />
22.0<br />
17.2<br />
18.1<br />
15.6<br />
Usage by Sex and Age Group<br />
24.9<br />
17.9<br />
14.7<br />
15.0<br />
13.7<br />
Restraint Ueed Male Female 16.24 25'49 Over 50<br />
Lap and Shoulder Belt<br />
Lap Belt Only<br />
Combined Total<br />
11.7<br />
5.6<br />
17.3<br />
11.9<br />
8.7<br />
20.6<br />
't1.7<br />
SOURCE: NHTSA estirflates based on a $urvey in 16 cities during 1977. Data was used only when<br />
vehicle model vear was confirmed by State$'Departments of Motor Vehicles (Contrect<br />
DOT-HS-6-0 1 340) .<br />
NOTE: Safety belt usage ratB has declined steadily from 76% in 1974 model interlock equipped<br />
cars during 1974 to 25o/o in 1977. The usage rate in 1977 model cars is 17a/o, The 1977<br />
survey shows a higher usage rate in smaller cars and among younger drivers.<br />
7.1<br />
18.8<br />
12.7<br />
6.6<br />
19.3<br />
8.3<br />
7.1<br />
15.4
Table A-15. Motor V€hicle Traflic Fatalltiss by Age and Sex<br />
United States, 1976<br />
Age Male Female Total<br />
o- 4<br />
5- I<br />
10- 14<br />
15- 19<br />
2A-24<br />
25-29<br />
30,34<br />
35- 39<br />
40-44<br />
45-49<br />
50- 54<br />
55 59<br />
60-64<br />
65-69<br />
70-74<br />
75 7g<br />
80- 84<br />
85-89<br />
90-94<br />
Over 94<br />
Unknown<br />
Total<br />
712<br />
891<br />
1,056<br />
6,262<br />
6,234<br />
3,782<br />
2,305<br />
1,629<br />
1,449<br />
1,400<br />
1,510<br />
1,?60<br />
1,130<br />
s32<br />
847<br />
t07<br />
515<br />
221<br />
5S<br />
11<br />
126<br />
33,038<br />
539<br />
555<br />
565<br />
2,1 99<br />
1,556<br />
989<br />
651<br />
510<br />
532<br />
529<br />
678<br />
536<br />
576<br />
568<br />
573<br />
469<br />
344<br />
114<br />
31<br />
5<br />
64<br />
1?,481<br />
SOURCE: Fatal Accident Feporting Svstem, NHTSA (30 dav deaths)'<br />
1,251<br />
1,447<br />
1,621<br />
8,461<br />
7,790<br />
4,771<br />
2,956<br />
2,139<br />
1,981<br />
1,929<br />
2,088<br />
1,796<br />
1,706<br />
1,498<br />
1,424<br />
1,1 76<br />
859<br />
335<br />
90<br />
16<br />
r93<br />
45,523<br />
A-37
A.38<br />
rft<br />
o)<br />
ui<br />
o<br />
(g<br />
o<br />
E<br />
o<br />
=<br />
c<br />
=<br />
x<br />
o<br />
a<br />
It<br />
c(E<br />
o Et<br />
{<br />
h<br />
3t<br />
E<br />
au<br />
q)<br />
H<br />
o<br />
o<br />
tn<br />
=<br />
G'<br />
o<br />
tr,<br />
.E<br />
tt<br />
6o<br />
J<br />
trt<br />
t<br />
g Il(E<br />
g G<br />
Eql<br />
g tg<br />
E<br />
E<br />
o<br />
E<br />
lE<br />
o<br />
o<br />
(J<br />
Ee<br />
E<br />
E<br />
s<br />
o<br />
J<br />
tr<br />
.u<br />
EE<br />
ER<br />
-c<br />
G<br />
o<br />
J tG<br />
0c<br />
Ee<br />
E<br />
o<br />
6<br />
o<br />
lg<br />
tr<br />
E<br />
q\qf\'.\14q?<br />
r\ o) o.) (\ (\t F F.l<br />
\lo(\l@cD(D(o<br />
-tr,t.c'dJF\l'll '-<br />
F- C! r'. (f, m .\l cO<br />
(o(OO)@C.'l$lQ<br />
- ( O O F C { F ( \<br />
c v l - F<br />
olq<br />
ct r\<br />
t-t:q<br />
cO€rf(\l<br />
(ort mcrre{F<br />
r'\(o com-t\<br />
C! \f C! Cr C"l (g<br />
r+ C!C!-<br />
t:qt:qf.l-ul<br />
N@(oco(?r(9c\r<br />
( \ l - F<br />
Oqf-COO(oC!<br />
(g
E o5<br />
.E troC)<br />
u)<br />
r',<br />
th<br />
o (E<br />
o<br />
E o<br />
.= E<br />
=<br />
l.i<br />
o<br />
U'<br />
!, tr<br />
F<br />
0)<br />
Er<br />
{ h<br />
-ct<br />
-c<br />
IE<br />
o<br />
o<br />
th o 3<br />
IE<br />
o E,<br />
.E<br />
T'<br />
.E<br />
qt<br />
d<br />
t gII(g<br />
d,<br />
(E<br />
E<br />
o<br />
q'<br />
lE<br />
IE<br />
o<br />
Ee<br />
E<br />
IE<br />
o<br />
J<br />
tr<br />
(E<br />
E<br />
bR<br />
TE<br />
o<br />
J tr<br />
E,<br />
ER<br />
E<br />
€qJ<br />
o<br />
J<br />
o<br />
o)<br />
o<br />
o<br />
sl<br />
=(E<br />
(J<br />
F<br />
EE<br />
$,E<br />
q?-tqo?qqu?<br />
FN=ft.(lfi)fl)-rr1<br />
oln(o$o)r\cr/ot<br />
|f '(Or-=tg)CD=fCO<br />
rf,to(-r-<br />
o?oqrq-<br />
SoC'r|Itot<br />
q<br />
fl)<br />
(ll ctr c,) t$ (\l<br />
(DOFOF q)<br />
qt (o u.) crt |l,<br />
otqfl?-0q c-l<br />
(\OFOm
A40<br />
E (l)<br />
f<br />
E<br />
E<br />
o<br />
()<br />
l.ft<br />
g,<br />
tri<br />
o<br />
(E<br />
o EIo<br />
.=tr<br />
=<br />
x<br />
o<br />
u,<br />
E tr<br />
E<br />
o<br />
ED<br />
{ >r<br />
Il<br />
t<br />
ag<br />
o<br />
6<br />
o<br />
u,<br />
o<br />
ID<br />
f<br />
ag<br />
o<br />
ED<br />
.E<br />
EI<br />
(E<br />
o<br />
d<br />
t<br />
.g<br />
.ct<br />
TE<br />
F<br />
g E<br />
F<br />
al,<br />
II<br />
g €<br />
E<br />
o<br />
€<br />
q)<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
|E<br />
(J<br />
Ee<br />
it)<br />
o<br />
J<br />
tr (E<br />
E<br />
ES<br />
F<br />
G<br />
(lJ<br />
q<br />
J E.E<br />
cc<br />
be<br />
E<br />
o<br />
I<br />
(g<br />
E<br />
+$<br />
otcDqroo)qt<br />
qC'oroo')t<br />
('o(gCOr\@cc<br />
tfmO)(oF\o<br />
6)rfrr.()(oeco<br />
olu?0qolqu?<br />
cttc)(('(oorr\<br />
c{<br />
GtOrOtI\r.O<br />
@ F ( O F ( O -<br />
tg + =l- tl- (O lr,<br />
J<br />
-o?c!0qu?f!F!ol<br />
tr-tOl$qff\(r)tO<br />
C{-<br />
ortEtOtcfOmFF<br />
tO m =f e oij Cr,t tf) _<br />
ct,o'Jdt$oc(oElro<br />
(\I<br />
Flf)+Ctfil(O NF(Ot$Fl!t -Nlrl$0oC'r(g\t<br />
0q6?\te.loq<br />
(\|FTO(\T(Off)<br />
N F F F<br />
(r)$(?r\|.crtf<br />
OmN-C')d)<br />
co. of (o- .: cA (o<br />
(rt c! c\,1 c,,l -<br />
olol 6lea?tq<br />
!om$ctFco<br />
F - t s<br />
('r-|Jl)FOF<br />
\ftoOr\orQ<br />
(r,l c"t - OJ |f, N<br />
(\ F e!,1<br />
fl?o?o?q0qeqo?<br />
FF\F-6)CO(g(rl<br />
(ocOu)(Oe{Ef(Qt<br />
otorlcoorr\o)o,<br />
\\m.\'.cr,N.o) +<br />
F f { - F F F<br />
- (\ (r) + ljl (O Fr.o(1 cDtt(o +F(\|aYtro(c|r\m<br />
q'qq-c?orJl+c\r@rf<br />
6tQ-
tt of<br />
.E Eo<br />
()<br />
lJ)<br />
ctt<br />
st<br />
o<br />
(E<br />
a<br />
T'<br />
o<br />
.=<br />
tr<br />
f<br />
'i<br />
(l'<br />
a<br />
E<br />
e(E<br />
o Er<br />
t\<br />
.a E(g<br />
o<br />
o<br />
ah<br />
o<br />
.1,<br />
=<br />
o<br />
Et<br />
.E<br />
T'<br />
.E<br />
o<br />
d<br />
{ o<br />
.cI<br />
(q<br />
(lI<br />
.E<br />
E o<br />
lt<br />
g a<br />
E<br />
o o<br />
bA<br />
s (!t<br />
ilt<br />
6<br />
.ts<br />
g(!<br />
0c<br />
toqul-Qo?=t:<br />
rt(\rs(oro({t(o<br />
P cr,<br />
l\C\Jc'OFCPCO<br />
cOrfFCDe{$l(O<br />
orst(ocoF!oe<br />
-+<br />
(\rFctr\tFlolI '<br />
FCDrO(oc"(')N<br />
-(Y]<br />
lftFOoror(or\<br />
t\llfrF-FCOr\Et<br />
CO =f crj + (O r\ llt<br />
foco-J<br />
cQrQqen?\<br />
- 6, F'f C'\1 (\ -<br />
(\ e.)<br />
o+$)r..cocotr<br />
Cf, C.,l In O r\ m CO<br />
dr(\rc4(oFf\rlll<br />
r-.eiG/J<br />
(\|F(0.+ttrFfo (\,lF+(''(Ol(,F c\l-(9Et(otr)gt<br />
ER u?a?rqq|4D<br />
mroco(o|.olltco<br />
Crl -<br />
s IEOJ<br />
o<br />
J<br />
cc<br />
EF<br />
q)<br />
g<br />
J<br />
.E<br />
o<br />
8t<br />
a ()<br />
IE<br />
CE<br />
f;'S<br />
F l*- c! CD S CD r''<br />
oor.crcoroff(e<br />
|J)- ro, co_ r$, rD. q €<br />
( J f c . ) - F F F<br />
qqu?0qq-0q<br />
roQ(crfl)|n
T'<br />
(lt<br />
3<br />
.E tro<br />
O<br />
rO<br />
€tt<br />
.ti<br />
o<br />
$<br />
v,<br />
E o<br />
.= tr<br />
f<br />
x<br />
o<br />
q<br />
E Etg<br />
o<br />
El<br />
{<br />
>r<br />
.cl<br />
-tr<br />
(g<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
0t<br />
of<br />
E<br />
o Et<br />
.E<br />
E (q<br />
(lt<br />
d<br />
+ g€(E<br />
o<br />
.E<br />
eo<br />
lt<br />
$<br />
E<br />
G<br />
o<br />
4<br />
E<br />
o<br />
o<br />
(l,<br />
=<br />
I<br />
s<br />
6<br />
o<br />
cl<br />
J<br />
tr<br />
t!<br />
CE<br />
Ee<br />
-tr<br />
.E<br />
$<br />
o<br />
ld<br />
(lt<br />
E<br />
s<br />
.E<br />
o<br />
'jl<br />
tr<br />
E<br />
sE<br />
ultc!\qqq<br />
(Ol-Ffl)r(\-<br />
(\ (f,<br />
OrgtCOr-O+$<br />
Otrlr\Oel()<br />
OOC{(OCO_(O<br />
NF*O/)-<br />
orN qqo?qqqc<br />
(\tDFN(v)-co<br />
fl)<br />
rto<br />
qf|Ji<br />
ffiro<br />
ol ol<br />
r\OffU)Fh(O<br />
(OF<br />
O (9 OJ r\ N cP C\l C'.t (9<br />
ctt, N. \ to. oq cO CO F Lll<br />
6 J o E l F F<br />
F S I<br />
NF(v)ql'r\tOgt (o({ (\rcDt()rt@o) (o({<br />
gr@mO19'qfgr (v)tl,<br />
- ! f t t d f U e e<br />
+(\r<br />
F F<br />
6rr{OOTOTSF<br />
(\OC!OC'{(Y)F<br />
OFOtf.,l--tf)<br />
S(rt<br />
OrF<br />
Ot{l<br />
+OCD(5fiI<br />
(v) e{<br />
--<br />
*N(n!l|J)F(Ct<br />
qqtola?oq\<br />
(0o,tOfl)(''l--<br />
(r) N<br />
mto@(odtN-<br />
(\|o<br />
F F<br />
tqrqtqu?tT<br />
$l ljt l$ CC - C{ fil<br />
t C*l<br />
qq<br />
r,l)o:rFFr\or\<br />
eDro(oNqt(oo<br />
cq-\af.t-qqtq-<br />
(vrs<br />
lo
E o=<br />
.Etr<br />
o<br />
g rr)<br />
g)<br />
st<br />
o<br />
.E<br />
6<br />
E.= E<br />
=<br />
ri<br />
o<br />
U'<br />
It tr<br />
(E<br />
o<br />
ctl<br />
>*<br />
.cI<br />
.E<br />
E<br />
o<br />
6<br />
o<br />
o<br />
a<br />
=rg<br />
o<br />
El<br />
.E<br />
T'<br />
(E<br />
0)<br />
at<br />
.i<br />
g<br />
E F<br />
-g (E<br />
tr<br />
o<br />
s lE<br />
IE<br />
o<br />
€ lgs<br />
g<br />
o<br />
t0<br />
o<br />
#<br />
E<br />
o<br />
J<br />
E<br />
ES<br />
E<br />
.q<br />
0,<br />
g<br />
J<br />
E (E<br />
IE<br />
Ee<br />
t<br />
E<br />
o<br />
T EIE<br />
TE<br />
sg<br />
n-ol-qe!qu?q<br />
c|) c{<br />
l\COoltfl)-e-- N<br />
qt<br />
oo@@toe!mlf)<br />
fll (fJ (O CD rr LO<br />
(o{'<br />
(lf r\<br />
c\r_o)-\qoJrya(o<br />
r+ (D<br />
toln<br />
O)-l'-c\J<br />
c{ c{<br />
FF<br />
c\qu?q-<br />
F(\(\t(Y)(\lF<br />
rl c\J -<br />
(?)Or\(Oe!l\<br />
r-lncfr(r)Lo$l<br />
(O(\I(fJ+g)F<br />
o c.J cll ct .- F<br />
T C',I F<br />
ctr |\ t0<br />
-(r)F<br />
+tft<br />
m(slfl<br />
-<br />
F(1 (l'tO)(OF- Ir'N FFtcq+to0, (oc\lrt<br />
oqoqqQ'.(?olo?l<br />
(\J Ef r\ - f.,l - - C',1<br />
$c\J<br />
Tf 00<br />
tDOr6r(\l(oO(\- Otql<br />
(Orrf'O=f 6tpFr FCP<br />
t\oD(7t-c\rltoF coo<br />
lf) c! 6t c\ Cq (\l C'{ (\l F F<br />
LO Ce<br />
nolqtq\<br />
C,l C\| Ctt - f.l (\rl<br />
se{<br />
F F<br />
ul c'{ q<br />
otLftr\(oF|f, FcoN<br />
of\(.lLcrNo<br />
grcolf!<br />
q. o. rfr- N- N_ (o_ o. q o<br />
@-NC{(-Jc,) (\l(v)<br />
IOCCF<br />
-C',1 (Qm\iF(olO Otl e c.,r (vl F ro cl cD (o rf<br />
ocqc'!f?qoq0qq<br />
O(omCrrc{FFF<br />
lfe!<br />
qe<br />
g'r5'rrO-C.'lQ(O LOCp<br />
COF*(\tt+(\rf m6, Orq<br />
oJ-c\r,a\ryF-(o-c'),<br />
(F{@.<br />
ti.qr\+$cv)cqet<br />
({)r<br />
Cotr,-<br />
e!0q\cf!q ryqq<br />
NNON(\I(\<br />
c\J r.c, 6, Fl (fJ c{<br />
CO N (\ O, r\ Cs)<br />
to.cc-olq--\<br />
@ - or<br />
or) fD Or<br />
ol.\nt<br />
co(v)+|J)lfr$<br />
Ol U) Cn<br />
(Y)(9e<br />
F(\lc')!i.u)(oF@ gt frl F C',1 (Y) + lro (o f\ @ tl<br />
^r 6 . P<br />
z<br />
Eg - ur<br />
E6 B E g<br />
F -<br />
@ O . \<br />
(Jql P = X<br />
;fr .V g E<br />
F q J , =<br />
E,e (J uJ<br />
- H O , ^ - L + J<br />
3 E<br />
^lc z<br />
ilP t uJ<br />
z.d 39 0<br />
,q* H G (J<br />
Yts ii: (J<br />
eE fiE<br />
E.g<br />
ul<br />
- 6 0 - l * J<br />
Et - 5 5 o (J<br />
Uo-q.! ;r i<br />
Elt:;t q ; H<br />
Ii ilE: -i x H ur I#ilE=;H-eF<br />
O t s q 1 9 . ' = * 1 5 - )<br />
gFi.F+Fe3?Eg<br />
HstE F:E'sF >F<br />
SEEEEES.FE-g<br />
ctt<br />
?<br />
E<br />
EFiEFEEEf<br />
rt<br />
€<br />
A43<br />
j<br />
'..
T'<br />
oJ<br />
.E<br />
0<br />
o lr'<br />
o)<br />
{i<br />
o<br />
(g<br />
a<br />
It o<br />
!- c=<br />
x<br />
o<br />
tt c(g<br />
o)<br />
Ef<br />
{<br />
ll<br />
16<br />
o<br />
cr<br />
o<br />
o .D<br />
.E<br />
()<br />
E''<br />
E<br />
E (E<br />
o<br />
(o<br />
.t<br />
g<br />
tt (q<br />
0'<br />
IE<br />
E<br />
o<br />
lt<br />
€<br />
E<br />
o<br />
E<br />
E<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
=<br />
E<br />
(J<br />
l t J ) + F t F m<br />
Ee lrFlridc"j<br />
l < r e e<br />
tg<br />
o<br />
6<br />
l.<br />
c<br />
6l<br />
E<br />
oJoDtoFr\to<br />
cooJmororo<br />
(o, tO. (v), oc. (o. O.<br />
c\o@c!of)-<br />
LO Crl -<br />
O,u)+<br />
fl)-€<br />
o) F (\,1<br />
e\t tf, l.f)<br />
C\l<br />
FC\lfitlO!le (oN(r)<br />
EF -hqc,?eqq<br />
(Y} Or F (fl - c-,1<br />
E<br />
IE<br />
q,<br />
g<br />
Jd crU<br />
E<br />
be<br />
E<br />
|q<br />
o<br />
lg<br />
tr<br />
(9<br />
E<br />
$E<br />
F F<br />
rO-1$<br />
- t"l<br />
-COCtl+-Ot FOrF<br />
Fd(frmff)r\ FOI\<br />
O,trl-co_e..l.-eo, o,.\F<br />
(olfr+sc{e/) Fc{<br />
LOc\lF<br />
rfOONg)IOF(\'|<br />
(o @ or) co (\t (\<br />
I T F F<br />
C{C')Cr)(y)r\F(O{'<br />
t0, :<br />
tr<br />
tr<br />
o<br />
l{t<br />
ot<br />
ui<br />
o (E<br />
o tt<br />
,EE<br />
=<br />
ri<br />
o<br />
q<br />
It<br />
cF<br />
g'<br />
tr)<br />
{ >r<br />
tt<br />
ct<br />
g'<br />
o<br />
o<br />
a o,<br />
of<br />
ag<br />
(J<br />
E,<br />
.E<br />
E Gl<br />
o<br />
d<br />
4 0)<br />
It TE<br />
F<br />
o G<br />
tr<br />
{)<br />
II<br />
g at<br />
E<br />
E<br />
t<br />
€<br />
o<br />
6<br />
o<br />
o<br />
f<br />
|a<br />
C)<br />
Be<br />
o<br />
J<br />
E<br />
IE<br />
E.<br />
Ee<br />
E<br />
.E<br />
(|,<br />
o<br />
J<br />
tr<br />
(E<br />
E<br />
Ee<br />
arl<br />
OJ<br />
6<br />
J<br />
6<br />
E<br />
sE<br />
ln<br />
e0qqolcq-q<br />
ocD(otnrtN<br />
u)F<br />
6re
A46<br />
Table A-17. Fatality Rates lor the United States and Selected Foeign Countries,<br />
1975<br />
Gountry<br />
Belgium<br />
Canada<br />
Finland (1974)<br />
Germany<br />
Netherlands<br />
Norway<br />
Spain<br />
$weden<br />
United States<br />
Fatalities per<br />
100,000 Population<br />
23.9<br />
26.6<br />
18.4<br />
24.1<br />
17.0<br />
13.4<br />
16.4<br />
14.3<br />
20.s<br />
SOURCE: European Conference of Mini$ers of Transport.<br />
Fatalities per<br />
100.000 Passenger Cars<br />
89<br />
72<br />
s0<br />
83<br />
69<br />
58<br />
t28<br />
43<br />
43<br />
Fatalities per<br />
100 Million Vehicle-<br />
Kilometers<br />
(Passenger Cars)<br />
8.5<br />
3.5<br />
7.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.5<br />
4.6<br />
14.0<br />
3.0<br />
3.0
Appendix B<br />
The National<br />
Motor Vehicle Safety<br />
Advisory Gouncil<br />
1977 Membership
NATIONAL MOTOH VEHICLE SAFETY ADVISOHY COUNCIL<br />
1977 MEMBERSHIP<br />
Mr. William T. Birge<br />
Vice Presid en t -Engineerin E<br />
Automotive Control Systems Group<br />
The Bendix Corporation<br />
401 Bendix Drive<br />
South Bend, lndiana 46602<br />
Dr. B. J. Campbell<br />
Director, Highway Safety Research Center<br />
University of North Carolina<br />
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514<br />
Mrs. Julie Candler<br />
Automobile Editor<br />
WOMAN'S DAY Magazine<br />
430 North Woodward<br />
Birmingham, Michigan 4801 I<br />
tMr. Gilbert E. Carmichael<br />
President, The Carriage House<br />
P.O. Box 5673<br />
Meridian, Mississippi 3930I<br />
Mr. H. David Crowther<br />
Director, Public Relations<br />
Lockheed-California Company<br />
P.O. Box 55I<br />
Burbank, California 91520<br />
+Dr. Harold Allen Fenner, Jr.<br />
Department of Orthopedic Surgery<br />
Norte Vista Medical Center, Ltd.<br />
2410 North Fowler Streer<br />
Hobbs, New Mexico 88240<br />
*Mr. Donald L. Gibson<br />
Deputy Chief<br />
California Highway Patrol .<br />
P.O. Box 898<br />
Sacramento. California 95991<br />
+Mr. Joel K. Gustafson<br />
Custafson, Caldwell, Stephens & Ferris P.A.<br />
l4l5 E. Sunrise Boulevard<br />
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304<br />
Dr. Henry A. Hill<br />
President, Riverside Research Laboratory, Inc.<br />
300 Neck Road<br />
Haverhill, Massachusetts 01830<br />
Dr. Don L. Ivey<br />
Director, Highway Safety Research Center-Texas<br />
Transportation Inst.<br />
Texas A&M<br />
College Station, Texas 77843<br />
Mr. Warren E. Jackson<br />
Vice President & Director of Engineering<br />
The Travelers Insurance Companies<br />
I Tower Square<br />
Hartford. Connecticut 061 15<br />
Mr. Robert D. Knoll<br />
Chief. Auto Test Center<br />
Consumers Union<br />
367 Boston Post Road<br />
Orange, Connecticut 06477<br />
'Mr. Louis C. Lundstrom<br />
Executive Director<br />
Environmental Activities Staff<br />
Ceneral Motors Corporation<br />
Detroit, Michigan 48202<br />
Mr. Robert L. McCaffrey<br />
Assistant to the President<br />
Truck Division<br />
International Harvester<br />
401 North Michigan Avenue<br />
Chicago, lllinois 6061 I
Mr. Henry J. Nave<br />
Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer<br />
Mack Trucks, Inc.<br />
P.O. Box M<br />
Allentown, PennsYlvania 18105<br />
Mr. George Nield<br />
Technical Consultant, Automobile Importers of<br />
America<br />
900 lTth Street, N.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20006<br />
Mr. John W. Noettl<br />
Director, MembershiP Services<br />
Automobile Club of Missouri<br />
201 Progress ParkwaY<br />
Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043<br />
Mr. Arthur R. Railton<br />
Former Vice President, Corporate Relations<br />
Volkswagen of America, Inc.<br />
South Summer Street<br />
Edgartown, Massachusetts 02539<br />
Mr. Archie G. Richardson, Jr.<br />
President. Automobile Owners Action Council<br />
l4ll K Strcet, N.W.*Suite 8m0<br />
Washington, D.C. 20005<br />
Mr. Cene Robetts<br />
Commissioner, Fire and Police Department<br />
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402<br />
Dr. Kenneth J. Saczalski<br />
Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering<br />
Northern Arieona University<br />
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001<br />
+Mr. Gordon M. Scherer<br />
Attorney at Law<br />
Cors, Hair & Hartsock<br />
l7l7 Carew Tower<br />
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202<br />
LECEND;<br />
E-4<br />
rChrysler/Mercedes<br />
DealershiP<br />
rMembers of the Truck and Bus Safety Subcommittee.<br />
rDr. Basil Y. Scott<br />
Deputy Commissioner for Administration<br />
New York Department of Motor Vehicles<br />
Empire State Plaza<br />
Albany, New York 12228<br />
*Mr. Herbert D. Smith<br />
Former Vice President<br />
Uniroyal, Inc.<br />
l4O Bingham Avenue<br />
Rumson. New Jersey 07760<br />
Mr, J, W. Stevens<br />
Member, Broward County Board of Commissionerg<br />
201 S.E. 6th Street<br />
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301<br />
*Mr. BerkleY C. Sweet<br />
President, Truck Body and Equipment Association<br />
5530 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20015<br />
'Mr. Martin D. Walker<br />
Executive Vice President<br />
Automotive OPerations<br />
Rockwell International Corporation<br />
2135 West Maple Road<br />
Troy, Michigan 48084<br />
Dr. Julian A. Waller<br />
Chairman, Department of Epidemiology &<br />
Environmental Health<br />
University of Vermont<br />
Burlington, Vermont 054O1<br />
Mr. Don A. Wilson<br />
Distribution SYstems Manager<br />
The Southland CorPoration<br />
Box 719<br />
Dallas, Texas 75221<br />
rDr. Ruth E. Winkler<br />
Optometrist<br />
lE72 East 15th Street<br />
Tulsa. Oklahoma 74104
Traffic and Motor VehiclE<br />
Safety Programs<br />
Authorization<br />
I<br />
Appropri ation<br />
Automotive Fuel<br />
EcorromV and Coniumef<br />
Inf ormation?<br />
Authorirdtion<br />
Appropriation<br />
Highway Safety Besearch End<br />
Development Programl<br />
Authorization<br />
J<br />
Appropriation<br />
Compliance Test FEcility<br />
Autlrorizationl<br />
Atrpfopriation<br />
Toral Traffic and H iqhway<br />
Safety Appropriation<br />
Authori?ation<br />
Appropriat ion?<br />
State and Community<br />
Safety Aopropriation<br />
Au th or ization<br />
( | ncentives)<br />
Qbl igati ons:<br />
NHTSA<br />
(l ncenrives)<br />
FHWA<br />
Table C-l. Summary ol Authorization and Appropriatlon<br />
Fiscal Years 1967-1978 (Millions of Dollars)<br />
FY 67 FY 68 FY 60 FY 70 FY 7I FY 72 FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76 FY f7 FY 78<br />
r3.9<br />
5.0<br />
10.0<br />
4.3<br />
3.0'<br />
.7<br />
23.9<br />
9.3<br />
67.0<br />
2.0<br />
18.5<br />
12.5<br />
20.0<br />
7 a<br />
l.J-<br />
1.2<br />
38,5<br />
r 9.8<br />
'r 00.0<br />
?5.0<br />
24.1<br />
15.9<br />
25.0<br />
10,6<br />
l.ts<br />
0<br />
49.5<br />
26.5<br />
I O0.0<br />
65.0<br />
23.0<br />
20.2<br />
30.0<br />
10.0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
53.0<br />
30.2<br />
o"<br />
?0.0<br />
40,0<br />
?5.9<br />
37.5<br />
17 .Q<br />
0<br />
0<br />
77.5<br />
42.9<br />
75.0<br />
rAuthorizsd under the NErionrl Traffic ond Motor Vehicle Saletv Act.<br />
?Authorired uilder the Mator Vehicle Inlormation and Cosr Soving$ Act with vnrpecifisd fundin€ lifi;tetion,<br />
lAuthorized undsr thc llighwnv Sefery Act.<br />
4 Lump sum authoritation tq remain avsilabl€ until expended.<br />
5 Femarnrn6 unapprop,io(€d bEtsnce.<br />
6 Funde appropriated f or conilruclion of complisnce teit itritiry withdrtn.<br />
TTheTrFtticand HighwEy Safsty Aporopriotion opprapriates funds lor proorsfri ol both rubrtentive Actr, Fnd th6 Moror VBhicle Conrumer Informarion Program.<br />
sTolsl autho,itdlion of $'|75 million resind6d undor rhe HiqhwEy Setety Act of t9?O-<br />
YFor flsca yeats 1967-1971 otrlrgilionr were incurred in total lor l6 Saf!ty Sl0ndordr. Currenfv, NHfSA has rssponEibility for 14,1/? StFnderds, FHWA for 3.1/? Stsnd€rdr.<br />
'olncludcs auihorizdtiod of $3O.0 millian tor FHWA.<br />
lllncludes nurhoritdtion of 3?5.0 millron tor FHWA ond $37,5 miiliqn lq. incen(ivs drdn(r for NHTSA,<br />
ll Includes authoriztstion ol $30.0 miJlioa fof FHWA and 948 mrilion for incenr;ve qronG tor NHTSA.<br />
lllncludst autho/ire(iorr of $35,0 million for FFIWA rnd $56,6 millian lor inc€ntive granrs for NHTSA,<br />
l4lncludet suthori?otion ot $25.0 million lor FHWA snd $15.0 million lor Incenrrvr qr.nri for NHTSA,<br />
I 5 Includes pey rEis sstimatss ol 91.5 million for FY 1978.<br />
o6<br />
40.0<br />
3Q.7<br />
70.0<br />
38.6<br />
9.6<br />
s.6<br />
1 19.6<br />
78.9<br />
78.0"<br />
67. t<br />
12.9<br />
JO,U<br />
a?n<br />
?3.0<br />
115.0<br />
44.2<br />
0<br />
0<br />
151.9<br />
77.2<br />
l30,o'o<br />
82. I<br />
'| 2.9<br />
30.3<br />
30.3<br />
37.0<br />
15.0<br />
42.5<br />
JO.O<br />
0<br />
g.06<br />
't09.8<br />
75.1<br />
l6?.Et<br />
t<br />
(37, s)<br />
66,8<br />
{.3)<br />
1a t<br />
b5.0<br />
55 1<br />
48.0<br />
7.7<br />
85.0<br />
28. I<br />
0<br />
0<br />
r 58.0<br />
70.9<br />
zo3.ott<br />
(48.0)<br />
85.3<br />
{ 13.4)<br />
14.7<br />
60.0<br />
38.3<br />
7.5<br />
.7<br />
ts5.0<br />
29.0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
68.0<br />
241,5"<br />
(56.51<br />
1 00.9<br />
( r 3.2)<br />
19. I<br />
60.0<br />
41,8<br />
1 1,7<br />
7.4<br />
40,0<br />
?7.1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
76.3<br />
l6?.ot<br />
o<br />
(15.0)<br />
r ?9.0<br />
(15.0)<br />
21.0<br />
00.0<br />
42.A<br />
4.7<br />
10.2<br />
60.0<br />
?6.9<br />
0<br />
0<br />
79.9<br />
t t<br />
1i7.ot'<br />
( r 5.0)<br />
172.Q<br />
(r 5.0)<br />
?8.0<br />
Total 2.O 65.0 70.o 75.0 80.0 95.0 80.0 r 00.0 120.0 r 50.0 200.0<br />
Il'l
c.4<br />
th<br />
.9<br />
.#oo<br />
o-<br />
E<br />
o<br />
E<br />
IE<br />
E<br />
0)<br />
r o<br />
.E<br />
E<br />
t! EO<br />
ra Cll<br />
EhCD<br />
F(O<br />
fi ctt<br />
6E<br />
:(E<br />
!g0,<br />
E><br />
BE<br />
-o.9<br />
]I I!<br />
(t<br />
@<br />
F<br />
I<br />
z o<br />
F<br />
o<br />
.g<br />
I<br />
ci<br />
o g<br />
.Ct<br />
(E<br />
F<br />
6<br />
r<br />
I<br />
@<br />
r<br />
F<br />
E<br />
F<br />
€<br />
E<br />
pu3 rE6A<br />
lsNISV<br />
palPlrdorddV<br />
la6PnE<br />
s,lu6plt6ld<br />
Puf rEEA<br />
lPnlJv<br />
p3ls!/dorddV<br />
re6Png<br />
S,lUdFr$Ard<br />
puf rssl<br />
leucv<br />
p€rE!rdorddV<br />
lE6pn8<br />
s,luop!rard<br />
puf rEeA<br />
lEnlev<br />
pglPr/do/ddV<br />
labpng<br />
s,lu6Pl$trd<br />
PUE JEAA<br />
lenlJv<br />
powrrdoiddV<br />
rs8Png<br />
l,luaplseJd<br />
pu3 rEoA<br />
lEnlsv<br />
pflB!idorddV<br />
rEopnE<br />
*,8,rusP!8ild--_<br />
pu3 rBsA<br />
lEnlJV<br />
pdlElldorddV<br />
lsGpng<br />
6,lu6Pr$6rd<br />
-pur<br />
ru"l<br />
lenlcv<br />
p6rB!rdorddV<br />
la6Png<br />
3,luap!3ard<br />
pul rEel<br />
lPnlcv<br />
paleydorddV<br />
re6Png<br />
s,luspFerd<br />
-p,il<br />
,e"i<br />
|ENOV<br />
peleudorddV<br />
l66Png<br />
E,lu9prEaJd<br />
Puf ,Be<br />
lPnlcv<br />
pEtErrdorddv<br />
refiPng<br />
E,luepFeJd<br />
4 o (a 6 r s s<br />
a € fl<br />
@<br />
a<br />
I @<br />
E<br />
o<br />
o<br />
N<br />
o @<br />
o o<br />
I<br />
o<br />
6<br />
o<br />
@<br />
a<br />
E E<br />
O Y<br />
e B<br />
3'd<br />
6<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
fl<br />
@<br />
r<br />
r<br />
@<br />
4<br />
N<br />
N<br />
@<br />
o<br />
o<br />
@<br />
o r<br />
I<br />
m<br />
E<br />
@<br />
N<br />
N<br />
$<br />
o<br />
N<br />
fl<br />
o<br />
ii<br />
6 o<br />
6<br />
;-<br />
fl @<br />
6<br />
o<br />
o<br />
a<br />
@ 6<br />
I<br />
@<br />
o o<br />
r<br />
3 @<br />
o m o D N<br />
o N<br />
@€<br />
o<br />
o N<br />
N<br />
N<br />
d @<br />
e<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
@<br />
@<br />
@ @ r<br />
@<br />
s<br />
@<br />
@<br />
F<br />
6<br />
@<br />
@<br />
r E<br />
@<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Q<br />
@ N s@<br />
@<br />
@ r<br />
N 6<br />
fl<br />
";<br />
m<br />
-;<br />
;o a g d<br />
I<br />
E<br />
I<br />
€<br />
E<br />
o<br />
e<br />
E<br />
E<br />
F<br />
E<br />
p<br />
s<br />
{<br />
.t<br />
a<br />
{ g<br />
E q<br />
E H<br />
6<br />
o<br />
! E<br />
E<br />
:<br />
@<br />
F<br />
E<br />
E o<br />
.9<br />
E<br />
o<br />
F<br />
;N<br />
F,<br />
@<br />
@<br />
G<br />
F<br />
o<br />
3<br />
.=<br />
c<br />
.9<br />
.!<br />
c<br />
E<br />
;<br />
.9<br />
l<br />
o<br />
E<br />
o<br />
E . C<br />
6 t<br />
_ 4<br />
E 3<br />
9 g
Appendix<br />
D<br />
Publications of the<br />
National Highway<br />
Traffic Safety<br />
Administration
NOTE<br />
This list comprises National Highway'l"raffic Safety Administration<br />
publications publishecl chrring 1977. Titles<br />
are arranged alphabetically and availability or sales in_<br />
formation is provided. Full addresses of sources from<br />
which these publications can be obtai red are given below.<br />
Additional information on the publications of<br />
NHTSA may be obtained from thc Ter:hnical Reference<br />
Branch, Room 5108, 4O0 7th Street, S. W., Washington,<br />
D.C. 20590. Telephone (ZOZ) 426-2768.<br />
Sources:<br />
National Highway Traffic Safety Adn inistration<br />
(NHTSA)<br />
4O0 7th Strcet, S.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20590<br />
l. An Activist's Guide for Curbing the Drunk<br />
Driver. Aprll 1977. Limited copies available fiom Gen_<br />
eral Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-902 ll0.<br />
2. Analysis of Angular Misaligr,ment Errors in<br />
Mounting Linear Acceleromelers to ,lnatomical Sub-<br />
"/?c/s. NHTSA Technical Rcporr by ArrLold K. Johnson.<br />
ocrober t977. NTIS. pB-273-561. $5.;:5.<br />
3. Automobile Passiye Restraint Systems, What<br />
They Mean to You. October 1977. Limited copies avail,<br />
able from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />
HS-802 538.<br />
4. Automotive Fuel Economy pntgmm. First An_<br />
nual Report to the Congress. January 1g77. Limited<br />
copies available from General Ser.vices Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT.HS.8OZ I6O.<br />
5. ElJect of Rate of Chan1e of filip on the peak<br />
Braking Coefficient of Passenger Cu Tires. NHTSA<br />
Technical Rcport. August 1977. NTIS. pB-270 934.<br />
$5.25.<br />
6. Emergency Medical Semices Statules, LI.S. State<br />
md Terrilorial Survey. November 197?. Limited copies<br />
available from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA.<br />
DOT-HS-802 688.<br />
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />
Department of Commerce<br />
5285 Port Royal Road<br />
Springfield, Virginia 22t 5l<br />
Superintendent<br />
of Documents<br />
U.S. Covernment Printing Office<br />
Washington, D.C. 20402<br />
Prices are subject to change.<br />
For earlier publications, see previous annual report$ flnd<br />
Publications of the National Highway TraJfic SaJeIy<br />
Administration. Iune 1977.<br />
7. Emergency Medical Techniciun Basic Training<br />
Course. For sale by Superintendent of Docurnents:<br />
Title Order No. price<br />
Course Gnlde (Second Edition),<br />
1977.<br />
student studt Guide, 1977.<br />
Inslructor's Lesson plans<br />
(Second Edition), 1977.<br />
050{0340275-3 $t.ln<br />
050-003-00278-0 3.50<br />
050{0340277-l 4.50<br />
8. Emergency Medical Technician paramedic<br />
National Training Course. l9?7. For sale by Supcrintendent<br />
of Documents:<br />
Title<br />
Order No. Price<br />
EMT-Psramedic Course 050-003-00279-8 $2.50<br />
Guide<br />
l5 Modules<br />
sold in sets<br />
(total ser pricc<br />
$4r.90)<br />
Instructor materials:<br />
Module l. The Emergency<br />
Medical Techniciun<br />
050-003-00280_1 1.60<br />
Modufe 2. Hunan Systems<br />
ond palient<br />
Assessmenl 050{03-m28l-0 3.Zs<br />
D-3
Module 3, Shock and Fluid<br />
Therapy<br />
Module 4. General Pharma-<br />
050-003{0282-8 3.00<br />
coloEy<br />
Module 5. RespiratorY<br />
050-003-00283-6 2'75<br />
Svstem 050-003402844 3.25<br />
Module 6. Cardiovascular<br />
System 05040340285-2 3.50<br />
Module 7. Central NerYous<br />
System<br />
050403-00286-1 2'75<br />
Module 8. Soft Tissue<br />
Injuries 050403{02874 3.00<br />
Module 9. Musculoskeletal<br />
System 050-m3-00288-7 2.75<br />
Module 10. Medical Emergencies<br />
050-00340289-5 3.00<br />
Module ll. Obstetric/GYn<br />
Emergencies<br />
Module 12. Pediatrics and<br />
050-m3-00290-9 2.15<br />
Neonatal Trans'<br />
port<br />
Module 13. Emergency Carel<br />
Emotionally<br />
050-003-m291-7 2.50<br />
Disturbed<br />
Module 14. Extrication/Ra-<br />
050403-00292-5 2-50<br />
cue Technique 050'0034m93-3 l'30<br />
Module 15. TelemetrY and<br />
Communicatiow 050-003-00294-l l'50<br />
g. Estimating the Sqfety qffects of the 55 MPH<br />
National Speed Limit. NHTSA Technical Note by Ezio<br />
Cerrelti. June 19?7. Limited copies available from Ceneral<br />
Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 475.<br />
10. An Evaluation of the Highway Safety Program.<br />
A Report to the Congress from the Secretary of<br />
Transportation. July 1977. Limited copies available<br />
from General Services Division, NHTSA. HS-802 4El'<br />
ll. Experimental SaIety Vehicles Intemational<br />
Technical Conference, Report on the Sixth, Washington,<br />
D.C., October 12-15, 1976. 1977' Limited copies<br />
available from General Services Division, NHTSA'<br />
DOT-HS-802 501.<br />
12. Fact Sheets. In format of National Highway<br />
Traffic Safety Administration News Releases. Limited<br />
copies available from Office of Public Affairs and Consumer<br />
Participation, NHTSA:<br />
Brake Fluids. September 1977'<br />
Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 198I-1984<br />
Passenger Cars. June 26, 19'17,<br />
Volkswagen Inte1rated Reseurch Vehicle Accepted for<br />
Testing by Department of Trunsportation's National<br />
Highway Traffic SaJ'ety Administration. June 28'<br />
1977.<br />
13. Fatal Accident Reporting System 1976 Annuul<br />
Report. November 1977. Limited copies available from<br />
General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 60?'<br />
D-4<br />
14. Fstal Accident Reporting System Report for<br />
the First HalI of 1976. March 1977. Limited copies available<br />
from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />
HS-802 384.<br />
75. Fatal Accident Reporting System. Report for<br />
the First Nine Months of 1976. June 1977. Limited<br />
copies available from General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 430.<br />
16. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and<br />
Regulations, with Amendments and Interprelations<br />
Issued through May 1976. March 1977. Looseleaf. For<br />
sale by Superintendent of Documents, by subscription.<br />
No. 050-003-9ffi80-0. $35.00, domestic; $43.75, foreign.<br />
17. 55 MPH Fuct Book. September 1977. Limited<br />
copies available from General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 590.<br />
18. Fuel Econony Imprcvement Through Diacnostic<br />
Inspecfron. NHTSA Technical Report by Ted<br />
Bayler and Leslie Eder. March 1977. NTIS. PB-265 064.<br />
$4.00.<br />
19. FY I97l Implementation of the National Accident<br />
Sampling System. NHTSA Technical Report by<br />
Russell A. Smith, James C. Fell, and Charles J' Kahane'<br />
February 1977. NTIS. PB-265 212. $4.50'<br />
20. Glossary of Terms for Use in Publicutions of<br />
Traffit Safety Pro+raml 1977*. Limited copies available<br />
from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />
HS,802 537.<br />
21 . Hazardous lulaterials-Emergency Action<br />
Galde. January 1977. Superintendent of Documents'<br />
No. 050-003-0025'7 -7 . 52.N.<br />
22. Highway Safety PIan Course' For Use with:<br />
Highway Safety Program Manual, VoL 102- April 1977'<br />
For sale by Superintendent of Documents:<br />
Title<br />
Administrative and Insttzctional<br />
Guide<br />
Participant Materials<br />
Instructor Materials<br />
Order No. Price<br />
050-003-00272-l $1.,t0<br />
050{03-00264{ 250<br />
050-003-00265-8 3.75<br />
23. Highway Safety Programs Standards Implementation<br />
S/afus as oJ'January L977. March 1977. Limited<br />
copies available from General Serviies Division'<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 294.<br />
U. [nternational Matorcycle Safety Conference,<br />
December l6-t7, 1975. Proceedings. March 1977. Limited<br />
copies available from General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 245.<br />
25. MAST Is Saving Lives, an EMS Success Story<br />
in Northeastern New York, Vermont and Northwestern<br />
New Hampshire. 1977+. Limited copies available from<br />
General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 391.<br />
rl9?7 is the year of receipt ofan otherwise undated publication'
26. lufotor Vehiele Diagnostic lrt;trytion Demonstration<br />
Progran Summary Report. NHTSA Tech_<br />
nical Report by Joseph J. Innes and Leslie E. Eder.<br />
October 1977. NTIS. PB-274 j3B. $6.00.<br />
2'7 . Mul tid istiplinary A rcident I n vestiga t ion Sum_<br />
maries. NTIS. (Individual case reporti inclucJed in the<br />
$ummaries are available for inspection in the Technical<br />
Reference Branch of NHTSA, Roorr jlOg, 400 7th<br />
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20S9(D.<br />
VoL No. Date NTIS Araer No. price<br />
7 7 Jan. 1977 pB-264 080 $r3.2s<br />
7 I Jan. t97i pB-Z6i 160 s.zs<br />
7 9 Jan. 1977 pB-264 0Bl s.zs<br />
28. Nationql Highway SqIety Ad,,isory Committee<br />
an Alcohol Safety Adjudicution. Finat Repttrt. Septem_<br />
ber 1977 . Limited copies available fron General Services<br />
Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 il0.<br />
29. The National Maximum Sped Limit, a Sum_<br />
mary of Three Regional Workshops (tonducted bt the<br />
Internstional Assaciation of Chiefs t,f police for the<br />
Department of Transportation. April 1977. Superin_<br />
tendent of Documents. No. 050{03_0)25g_5. $3.25.<br />
32. NHTSA Research Activities, a Report to the<br />
Secrelary of Transportation by the National Motor<br />
Yehicle Safety Advisory Council. Iuly 1977. Limitcd<br />
copies available liom General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS.8Oz 5I6.<br />
33. Ptysr'cs snd Automobile Salbty Betts. lg7i.<br />
Superintendent of Documents. No. )50403402j4-2.<br />
$1.90.<br />
34. Problem ldentification Course. April 1927.<br />
Superintendent<br />
of Documenrs:<br />
Title<br />
Administrative and Instruc-<br />
Qrder No, Pricv<br />
tional Guide<br />
Instrutl0r Materials<br />
Partic ipants Materials<br />
050-mt-02666-6 $1.70<br />
050-{nt-00371-2 4.s0<br />
050-00t-002704 2.75<br />
This course is designed to be used witt,:<br />
15. Problem ldentification Manual for TrafJic<br />
Sqfety Programs<br />
36. A Profile ol Fatal Accidents Involving Alcohot.<br />
NHTSA Technical Report by James C. Fell. September<br />
1977. NTIS. PB-274 298. $4.50.<br />
37. Publications of the National Highway Trqffic<br />
Safety Administration. June 1977. Limired copies available<br />
from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />
HS-802 _512.<br />
38. Report on Administrative Atljudication of<br />
Trqffic l4fractions, Highway Sajety Act of ISTJ (Section<br />
222). Iuly 1977. Limited copies available from Ceneral<br />
Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 612.<br />
39. Restraint Syslems Evaluation project Codebook,<br />
by Jeanie S. Mungenast and Charles J. Kahane.<br />
NHTSA Technical Note N43-32-2. March 1977. Limited<br />
copies available from General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 285.<br />
4O, Revrew of Head Rotational Measurements dur_<br />
ing Biomechanical Impact Tests. NHTSA Technical<br />
Report by Arnold K. Johnson and Anthony S. Hu.<br />
August 1977. NTIS. pB-Zjt 886. $4.50.<br />
41. Revrlew of Information on the Sqfety ffiects of<br />
the 55 MPH Speed Limit in the United Stdfes. NHTSA<br />
Technical Note by Donald F. Mela.<br />
30.<br />
May 1977.<br />
National<br />
Limited<br />
Training Cource, Enrcrgency Medicsl copies available from Ceneral<br />
Technicipn,<br />
Services<br />
Paramedic.<br />
Division,<br />
Cource Gude. June 1977. NHTSA. DOT.HS-802 383.<br />
Superintendent of [psurnsnts. No. 050_003_m27g_g.<br />
$2.50.<br />
42. The Role of Medical Advisory Boards in Driver<br />
Licensing. March 197?. Superintendent of f)ocuments.<br />
31. NII?1S/4 Reorganization Info,mation Decem- No. 05040340252-6. $1,20.<br />
ber 1977. Limited copies available from Ceneral Services<br />
Division. NHTSA.<br />
43. Rural Courts and Highway Safety. 1977. Lim_<br />
ited copies available from Ceneral Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 479.<br />
Volume I<br />
Volume II<br />
Orcjer No. Price<br />
050-mI-m262-3 $2.7s<br />
050-m l-m263-l 2.75<br />
4. Sgety Belt Instructional Series:<br />
4a. Information That Can Save your Life_The<br />
Safety Beil Instructional Series, Z publications, an<br />
Audio-Vkual Presentation, and a Game About Safety<br />
Belt Use and Effectiyeness. June 1977. Limited copies of<br />
descriptive brochure available from Ceneral Services<br />
Division, NHTSA.<br />
44b. The Automohile Safety BetI Facr Bpok. Feb_<br />
ruary 1977. Superintendenr of Documents. No. 050-003_<br />
002504. $0.80.<br />
4c.. EncoumEing Employees to Ilse Safety Belts, a<br />
Program Jor Industry and Governmenl. February jgj7.<br />
Superintcndent of Documents. No. 050403402474.<br />
$0.75.<br />
M. Getttng the Safety Belt Message Across, a<br />
Guidefor Driver Educslion Instructors. February 1977.<br />
Superintendent of Docurnents. No. 050-003-00245-3.<br />
$0.35.<br />
44+. How Many of These Fair1, Tales Have you<br />
Told? February 1977. Superintendent of Documenrs.<br />
No. 050-003-00251-8. 90.50. $4.50 per t00 copies.<br />
D-5
l4f . Safety Belt Activity Book, a Guidefor Teachers<br />
of Grades K-6. Fcbruary 1917. Superintendent of<br />
Documents. No. 050-003-00243-7. $ | .70.<br />
44g. The Sa.fety Belt Game. February 1977. Superintenderrt<br />
of Documents. No. 050-003-00246-1. $1.30.<br />
44h. The Sqfely Belt Message, Ihe Student's Lesson.<br />
February 1977. Superintendent of Documents. No.<br />
050-003-m2,9-5. $0.45.<br />
4/;i. Safety Belts-Fact or Fiction. A New Slidel<br />
Tape Program. 1977. National Audio Visual Center,<br />
Ceneral Services Administration, Order Section, Washingron,<br />
D.c. 20409. Titie No. 008919. $15.00. Make<br />
check payable to National Archives Trust Fund.<br />
4j. Teaching the Safety Belt MessaEe, a Guide for<br />
Teachers of Driver Education Instructors. February<br />
1977. Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-m3-<br />
00248,8. $0.35.<br />
45. Safety Consequences of Raising the National<br />
Speed Limit from 55 MPH to 60 MPH. NHTSA Technical<br />
Report by Ezio C. Cerrelli. May 1977, NTIS.<br />
PB-267 839. $5.25.<br />
a6. Sqfety Related Recall Campaigns for Motor<br />
Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment, Including Tires-<br />
Superintendent of Documents:<br />
Period Order No. Price<br />
I Jan. 19?7-31 March 197? 050-003-00274-7 $1.60<br />
I Apr. 1977-30 June 1977 050-003-00296-8 1.30<br />
47. School Bus Vehicle Sa.fett Report July 1977.<br />
Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-003-m275-5.<br />
$2.90.<br />
48. Seat Belt Performance in 30 M.P-H. Barrier<br />
Impacts. NHTSA Technical Report by John B. Morris.<br />
April 1977. NTIS. PB-269 962. $5.25.<br />
49. The Severily of Large Truck Accidents.<br />
NHTSA Technical No/e by James Medlund. April<br />
1977. t.imited copies available from General Services<br />
Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 332.<br />
50. Stste Vehicle Programs Spedal Reporf. June<br />
1977. Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-001-<br />
001284. $1.00.<br />
51. Slatus of the Highway Sqfety Program Standards<br />
as of January 1977. Novcmber 1977. Limited copies<br />
available I'rom Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA.<br />
DOT-HS-802 595.<br />
52. Subject Bibliography Series. NTIS:<br />
No.<br />
SB-II<br />
SB-I2<br />
SB.I3<br />
D.6<br />
Title NTIS Order No. Price<br />
Fuel Economy.<br />
1977.<br />
Brakes. 1977.<br />
Motortycles,<br />
19'7'1.<br />
PB-265 387 S 7.25<br />
PB-265 386 6.50<br />
SB-14 Tires. 1977.<br />
SB-15 Youth and Driv-<br />
PB-213 270 $19.m<br />
ing. 1977. Limited copies available<br />
from General Services Divi*<br />
sion, NHTSA. DOT-HS-<br />
80? 306. Will be available<br />
from NTIS at later date.<br />
5B-16 Periodic Motor<br />
Vehicle Inspection.<br />
1917.<br />
SB-17 Motor Vehicle<br />
Titling and Reg-<br />
PB-268 160/A5 9.00<br />
istration. 1977. PB-211235/AS 6.m<br />
SB-18 Bumpers. 1977.<br />
SB-19 Recreational<br />
PB-271 236/A5 7.25<br />
Vehicles. 1977. PB-271 237/AS 6.50<br />
SB-20 Pedestrians. 1977 - PB-272 920/OWT<br />
SB-21 Tethnical<br />
12.50<br />
Reports. 1911 .<br />
SB-22 Accident Risk<br />
Forecasling.<br />
PB-2'12'141 9.00<br />
1977. PB-272 936/6WT 6.00<br />
53. Supplement to the 1976 Report on Administrative<br />
Adjudication oJ' Trqffic Infractions. Highway<br />
Sqfett Att of 1973 (Section 222). March 1977. Limited<br />
copies available liom General Services Division,<br />
NHTSA. DOT.HS-802 254.<br />
54. Tips tn Car Care and Safety for Deaf Drivers.<br />
Spanish edition, February 1977. Limited copies available<br />
from General Services Division, NHTSA.<br />
55. Traffic Laws Commenlary. Superintendent of<br />
Documents:<br />
nlk<br />
Hardship licensing. May<br />
Order NcI Price<br />
1977. 050-003-00277-4 $2.30<br />
Rules of the Road Rated.<br />
october 1977. 050-003-00299-21.40<br />
56- Tra,ffic Safety Programs Multi-Year Plan, FY<br />
1979-1983. 1977+. Limited copies available from Office<br />
of Traffic Safety Programs, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 l8l.<br />
57. Traffic Sqfet! '76, a Digest of Activities o.f lhe<br />
Nalional Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Septcmber<br />
1977. Limitecl copics available tiom General<br />
Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 505.<br />
58. Traffic Safety '76. A Report by the President<br />
on the Administration of the Highway Safery Ail of<br />
1966, as Amended. l9'l'1 . Superintcndent of<br />
Documents. No, 050-003-00269-1. $3.75.<br />
59. Traffic Salety '76. A Report by the President<br />
on the Administration of the National Trqffic and<br />
Motor Vehicle Safet! AcI of 1966, as Amended, and the<br />
Motor Vehicle Information & Cost Savings Act oJ'1972,<br />
PB-265 396 L00 * I 97? is thc ycar of receipt of an otherwisc undated publication.
Appendix E<br />
Current Research Grants<br />
and Contracts and the<br />
Problems They Address
RESEARCH AND DEVELOFMENT PROGRAM CODES<br />
3 Research and Development 361 Supporting Research<br />
33 Traffic Safety Rescarch 363 30ffi Pound Sedan<br />
331 Alcohol and Drug Programs 364 4000 Pound Sedan<br />
3313 Research on Relationship and Effect 365 Special Purposc Vehicles<br />
3314 Research on Countertneasures 366 Testing and Evaluation<br />
336 Driver-Pedestrian Factors Research 371 Vehicle Structures<br />
3361 Pedestrian Safety 37ll Flammability-Materials<br />
3362 Safety Belt Usage 3712 Postcrash Factors<br />
3363 Driver Education 3713 Crashworthiness-Energy Management<br />
3364 Driver Licensing Systems<br />
3365 Vehicle Factors 3714 Design f)evelopment<br />
3366 Safe Driving Conformance 3'll5 Production Feasihility-Application Study<br />
34 Accident Investigation and Data Analysis 3716 School Bus Safety<br />
341 Accident Investigation 372 Occupant Packaging<br />
342 Mathematical Analysis 3721 Restraints, Ceneral-Advanced Protection<br />
343 Information and Data Systems Systems Research<br />
351 Vehicle Operating Systems 3722 Air Bags-Protection Systems Development<br />
35ll Brakes and Evaluation<br />
3512 Vehicle Handling 3'123 Other Passive Restraints-Protection<br />
3513 Tires Systems-Validation Systems<br />
3514 Support Systems 3724 Belts and Integrated Restraints-Restraints-<br />
3515 Advanced Systems Special Projects<br />
352 Driver-Vehicle Interaction 371 Biomechanics<br />
3521 Driver Visibility 3731 Anthropomelrics and Human Simulation<br />
35??. Vehicle Lighting<br />
3732 Human Tolerance and Injury Mechanisms<br />
3523 Vehicle Instrumentation, Controls, and 3733 Kinematic Modeling and Validation<br />
Controllability 3'135 Protection Systems Performance Studies<br />
353 Fuel Economy , 391I Transportation and Handling of (iovernment<br />
354 Vehicles-in-Use Property<br />
36 Experimental Safety Vehicles 3921 Data Processing<br />
EA
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
CURRENT RESEARCH GRANTS AND CONTHACTS<br />
AND THE PROBLEM$ THEY ADDRESS<br />
Appendix E contains a list of reeearch contracts which<br />
were active during calendar year 1977. The National<br />
Highway Traffic Safety Administration's policy favors<br />
competitive procurement rather than the use of grants.<br />
The bulk of the research is performed by private industry<br />
and universities instead of government employees.<br />
Research is carried out primarily to develop data to support<br />
near-term and future standards.<br />
NI{TSA snd FHWA continue to allocate a significant<br />
portion of their research to priority programs. These<br />
E4<br />
priorities now include increased emphasis on motorcycle,<br />
moped, and pedestrian safety; emphasis on fundamental<br />
approaches to reducing alcohol and drug-related<br />
accidents; establishment of a research program to<br />
develop the technical support for fuel economy standards;<br />
an integrated effort to provide research results to<br />
support passive restraint standards; the integrated<br />
vehicle systems program to design, develop, construct,<br />
and test integrated vehicles embodying advanced technological<br />
features; and establishment of the initial portion<br />
of the National Accident Sampling System (NASS)<br />
by the National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
Program<br />
Code Tltlc<br />
3313AU System Analysis of a General<br />
Deterrent Countermeasure<br />
Program<br />
33138K Effects of Alcohol on the Driver's<br />
Visual I nformation Processing<br />
33138L ADP Support for Effects of Alcohol<br />
and Visual Information Processing<br />
33138N Pharmacoklnetlc Effects of Drugs on<br />
Driving Performance<br />
Table E-1. Major ResearchProfects<br />
Pedormed for HHTSA<br />
Under Contracts ActiveDuring<br />
Calendar Year 1977<br />
Contractor<br />
Contrsct Numbsr<br />
3313CA A Comparison of Alcohol Involvement Essex Corporation<br />
in Exposed and Injured Drivers DOT-HS4{09S4<br />
3313C8 Alcohol in Pedestrians and Pedestrian Dunlap and Associate$, Inc.<br />
Casualties<br />
DoT-HS-4.00S46<br />
3313C0 On-The-Road Detectlon of DWI'g<br />
3313DA Drug Use in Drlver Fatalities and<br />
Slmilarly Exposed Drivers<br />
3313DC State of Knowledge and Informatlon<br />
Needs in Alcohol/Drugs and Highway<br />
Safety<br />
3313EC Test for Detectlon of Mariluana in<br />
Body Fluids<br />
3313EF Development and Valldatlon of Narv<br />
Marlluana Technology Data<br />
3313EH Drug Research Methodology<br />
3313E1 Analysls for Drugs In $allva and<br />
Breath<br />
3313F8 The Effects of Alcohol on the Driver's<br />
Deci$ion-Making<br />
Behavior<br />
3313FC Special Problems and C/M$ Targets<br />
for Fleduction of Alcohol-Belaled<br />
Casualties<br />
3313FF Effects of Alcohol and Marijuana on<br />
Driver Control Behavior<br />
3313FH Psychophysical Tests for D\tVl Anest<br />
3313F1 Techniques for Predicting High-Risk<br />
Drivers for Alcohol Countermeasure$<br />
3313FJ Charge of DWI Drivers-Alcohol/Crash<br />
Involved, Arrested, and On-th+Road<br />
Anacapa $ciences, Inc. 08/16/76<br />
DOT-HS+01456 04lml78<br />
Southern California<br />
Research Institute<br />
DOT-HS-il1233<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management11112176<br />
Sy$tems<br />
1'il1il7e<br />
PO-7-313?<br />
N.l.D.A.<br />
rloT-Hs-7.016511A<br />
Anacapa Sciences, lnc,<br />
DOT-HS-741538<br />
Midwest Research lnstltute<br />
DOT-l-tS-440941<br />
University of Michlgan<br />
DOT-HS-5.01217<br />
University of Missourl<br />
DOT-HS-440968<br />
University of Mlssourl,<br />
Kansas City<br />
DOT-HS-741s27<br />
HSRI<br />
DOT-H$7{1530<br />
Flesearch Triangle Instltute<br />
DOT-HS-7-01737<br />
Systems Technology, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-440999<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
ooT-Hs-4-00945<br />
Funds Used<br />
(fhousands of Dollart)<br />
Siarl Pre.<br />
Ffnlsh FY T6 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />
06/30/75<br />
06115t77<br />
@t14trl<br />
07t1Atffi<br />
w17174<br />
o2128ln<br />
0fl30/74<br />
05/1s78<br />
og0u7f<br />
m/oe79<br />
ffi125t74<br />
ffi125t77<br />
03130t77<br />
12131177<br />
ffit28t74<br />
06125t77<br />
10/19/76<br />
fitlwn<br />
10t28t78<br />
12/31t77<br />
ffil28lT7<br />
w28179<br />
ffi12w74<br />
111w77<br />
w17174<br />
01/15ln<br />
Systems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75<br />
DOT-HS-5.01257 09/30/78<br />
Soulhern Californla Feeearch 06/30/75<br />
f nstitute o5lw77<br />
DOT-HS-+0124e<br />
Universlty of North Carolina 06/30/75<br />
DOT-HS-S01250 1113p/77<br />
StanfordResearchlnstltute 06/09/75<br />
DOT-HS-Fo1 176 01131177<br />
154<br />
174<br />
326<br />
u4<br />
1m<br />
100<br />
23<br />
42<br />
73<br />
196 30<br />
208 25<br />
88<br />
119<br />
1m<br />
166<br />
33<br />
s7 34<br />
E4 Nl<br />
27<br />
30<br />
81<br />
B2<br />
151<br />
17<br />
23<br />
151
Program<br />
Code Thle<br />
3314AG SoberingAgentEflectiveness<br />
Measurement and Development<br />
3314AM Critical Task Interlock Units for Poland<br />
And USSR<br />
33148M Disposable Breath Tester and Breath<br />
Collection Device<br />
Table E-1. (Continued)<br />
Conlractor<br />
Contract Number<br />
33148N Breath Measurementlnstrumentation Transportation Systems Center 10/01/76<br />
PPA.HS-702 09t30t77<br />
3314D8 ldentlflcation of DWI BehavioJ PatternsP$ychometrics,<br />
Inc. 06i30i75<br />
and Methods for Change<br />
DOT.HS-5-01270 06/30/78<br />
3361AE Flural PedestrianAccident$<br />
3361AJ Alcohol Involvement in Pedestrians<br />
and Pedestrian Casualties<br />
33618A $pecific Problems and Countermeasures<br />
for Bicycle SafetY<br />
336188 Urban Crossing Problemg<br />
3361CM ldentification and Feaslbillty Test of<br />
Specialized Rural Pedestrian Training<br />
3361CN Dev€lopment of Modol Regulations for<br />
Rural Pedestrian Safety<br />
3361CO ldent, and Development of Countermeasures<br />
for Bicyclist/Motor Vehicle<br />
Problems<br />
3361DC Experimental Field Test of Proposed<br />
Anti-Dart-Out Trainlng Programs<br />
3361DD Experlmental Fietd Test of Proposed<br />
Pedeslrian Safety Messages<br />
33610H Development and Test of Selected<br />
Model Pedestrlan Safety Regulatlons<br />
3361EC Experimental Field Test of lce Cream<br />
Vendor Model Ordinance<br />
33,61FA EnforcementFrequency,Sanctlons<br />
and Compliance Level for Pedestrian<br />
Safety<br />
3361F8 Evaluation of Exlstlng Pedestrlan and<br />
Bicyclist Regulations<br />
Southern California Research 06/30/75 145<br />
lnstitute<br />
DOT-HS 5 01245<br />
12130177<br />
Systems Technology, Inc.<br />
DOT-H5-6-01467<br />
University of Oklahoma<br />
Health Services Center<br />
DOnHS-7-01795<br />
Funde Used<br />
(fhousands<br />
of Dollare)<br />
Start Pre.<br />
Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />
w20176<br />
10131177<br />
09130177<br />
09/30/79<br />
Biotechnology, Inc. 06/30/73<br />
DOT-HS-355-3-718 QA15n8<br />
Dunlap and Associates, Inc. 06130174 326<br />
DOT-H$-4-00946 0s/15/78<br />
Anacapa Sciences, lnc. 06128174<br />
DOT.HS-4-00982 05tW77<br />
ApplledScienceAssociates, 06120175<br />
lnc. 1113Q177<br />
DOT-HS-$01163<br />
3361CL Road Worker and Dismounted Motorist Dunlap and Associates, Inc. Wl26l77<br />
Pedestrian Safety Regulations DOT-HS-7.01712 05t26t79<br />
ApptiedScienceAssociates, Ogl30l77<br />
Inc. 05/30/79<br />
DOT-H$7.0174S<br />
Dunlap and Associates, Inc.<br />
DOT-H5-7-01753<br />
Dunlap and Associates, Inc.<br />
DOT-H5-7-01726<br />
ffit28t77<br />
12t2W78<br />
Qgr28177<br />
09/28/79<br />
AppliedScienceAssociates, 06124174<br />
lnc. 11139177<br />
DOT-HS-4-00955<br />
Dunlap and Associates, Inc. ffi128174<br />
DOT-HS-4-00952 05/31/79<br />
Dunlap and Associates, Inc. 08113176<br />
DOT-HS-6-01444 04t13r77<br />
Dunlap and Associates. Inc. 0f/07175<br />
DoT-HS-5-01 144 12131t77<br />
Dunlap and Associates, lnc. 06/05/75<br />
DOT-HS-$01168 01/31/78<br />
Dunlap and Associates, lnc. 06/30/78<br />
DOT-HS-6-01411 ffit30t77<br />
80<br />
553<br />
168<br />
323<br />
345 230 119<br />
129<br />
95<br />
73<br />
27<br />
65<br />
42<br />
56 94 31<br />
78<br />
55<br />
192<br />
613<br />
118<br />
175<br />
108<br />
52<br />
25
Program<br />
Code Tlrls<br />
3361FG Provision of Pedestrian and Bicyclist<br />
Base Llne Data<br />
3362AQ Development of Speciflcations for<br />
Passive Belt Systems<br />
336284 $afety Belt Usage $urvey of the Traffic<br />
Population<br />
33628D Safety Belt Usage Attitudes<br />
33628L Evaluatlon of Safety Belt Educailonal<br />
Program for EmPloYees<br />
3sEZBN Lease Toyota for Belt Evaluatlon<br />
336280 Safety Belt Educational Material<br />
33628P Safety B,slt Educatlonal Materlal<br />
336285 Safety B€lt Usage ln the Trafflc<br />
Population<br />
33628T validatlon of Safety Belt Usage Data<br />
33628U Safety Belt Education Program Distribution<br />
Listing<br />
33628V Betrieval of DMV Data<br />
33628W<br />
Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />
Contractor<br />
Gontrac{ Numbor<br />
AppliedScienceAssociates, 08/0276<br />
lnc.<br />
03/31/79<br />
DOT-Hs-Fo14s3<br />
Man Factors, Inc.<br />
DOT-Hs,7-01617<br />
Kirschner A$sociates<br />
DoT-H$S41340<br />
336288 Safety Belt Educatlon Program: Dlstrl- National Business Lists<br />
bution Listing<br />
Po-7-3212<br />
33634H<br />
3363C1<br />
3363CM<br />
3363F8<br />
3363Fc<br />
Effectiveness of MVMA Safety Belt<br />
Mass Media Campaign<br />
Computer Services<br />
Teknekron, Inc.<br />
DOT-H$-7{1644<br />
Oplnion Research Corp.<br />
ooT-HS.7-o1707<br />
Toyota Motor Sals$ USA, Inc.<br />
PO-7-3e28<br />
G$A, National AudieVisual<br />
Genter<br />
Po7-324414<br />
NHTSA. General Seryices<br />
Dlvision<br />
Reqn. 4842062<br />
Opinion Research CorP.<br />
DoT-HS.7-01736<br />
Qpinion Research Corp.<br />
PG7-3396<br />
National Business Lists<br />
Various<br />
$tate Depts. of Motor Vehlcles<br />
Various lnvoices<br />
Opinion Research Corp.<br />
PO-7.365?<br />
NHTSA, Office of Managementofl03/77<br />
Systerns<br />
09/30/77<br />
ADP-77-075<br />
Safe Performance Curriculum Perform- University of Southern 0fl30/75<br />
ance Measures<br />
California<br />
DoT-HS-ffi1263<br />
02128177<br />
Youth Alcohol Safety Education Crlterla<br />
Development<br />
Survey Analysls ol Short-Term<br />
Approaches to Rehabilitation of Convicted<br />
DWI's<br />
Feasibility of Developing Trainlng Prr<br />
gram to lmprove Deficient Driver<br />
Factors<br />
3363GA Accident Avoidance $kill Training<br />
National Publlc Service<br />
Research Institute<br />
DOT-HS-7{1794<br />
Mc Ber and Company<br />
DOT-H$s-o1253<br />
IRPS<br />
DOT-HS-7-01811<br />
Essex Corporation<br />
DOT HS-7{1547<br />
Funds Us€d<br />
(Ihoueands of Dollars)<br />
Start Pre-<br />
Flnlsh FY 76 FY 78 FY z FY 7E<br />
07t15177<br />
Q7115178<br />
Q5125t76<br />
09r2fl78<br />
12116t76<br />
12116t76<br />
ffi|ffit77<br />
07/0978<br />
w3't177<br />
11131178<br />
01lo3t77<br />
oz0F/n<br />
03/0e77<br />
03/0977<br />
07t07tn<br />
07tQ7t7?<br />
09,30t7?<br />
0430/80<br />
w06177<br />
04106177<br />
05t17ln<br />
05117m<br />
06t24t77<br />
06124177<br />
0B/ofl77<br />
0&09/77<br />
09/30/77<br />
03/31/79<br />
ffit27t75 71<br />
1A31177<br />
09/30fi7<br />
03/30/78<br />
1A15l7E<br />
12t15t77<br />
60<br />
87<br />
145<br />
17<br />
€9<br />
34<br />
118<br />
36<br />
TI<br />
56<br />
Program<br />
Code Tlil0<br />
3363G8<br />
3364AO<br />
33644P<br />
3364AU<br />
3364AX<br />
33648A<br />
3364CA<br />
33S4CB<br />
&364CC<br />
3364CD<br />
3364CE<br />
33B4DB<br />
33658H<br />
3S658l<br />
336581<br />
33658N<br />
3366AC<br />
3366AF<br />
3366A1<br />
Vehicle Zones: lmplicatlons for Driver<br />
Education<br />
Mark ll B Vlsion Tester Procurement<br />
Vision Tester Validation Study<br />
Peripheral Vlslon Training for Motor<br />
Vehicle Drivers<br />
Analysis of State Boad Test<br />
Examinations<br />
Drlver Visual Limitatlons Diagnosis<br />
and Treatment<br />
Integrated Safe Driving Information<br />
System Development<br />
Older Driver Licensing and lmprov+<br />
ment System<br />
Heavy Vehicle Driver Licensing<br />
Feasibility of Developing a Medlcal<br />
Candition Data CQllection Sy$tem<br />
Feasibility of Designating Medical<br />
Examiners for Interstate Commercial<br />
Drivers<br />
Development of Driver lmprovement<br />
System for Traffic Violators and Acc.<br />
ReDeaters<br />
Development of an In-Traffic Test for<br />
Motorcycles<br />
Motorcycle Operator $klll Test<br />
Develooment<br />
Field Test of Motorcycle Safety<br />
Education Course for Nonriders<br />
Advanced Motorcycle Flider Course<br />
Development Plan<br />
Gltizen Participatlon to lmprove Hlghway<br />
Salety<br />
Decriminalization Admini$trative<br />
Adjudication<br />
Traffic Law $anctions<br />
Table E-1. (Continued)<br />
Gontractol<br />
Contract Number<br />
Vector Enterprises, Inc. QSl27l77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01791 0gt2ry78<br />
Honeywell, lnc. ffil29l70<br />
DOT-HS.6-01342 02/11178<br />
National Con, Service, Inc. 0'1111177<br />
Safety Management<br />
DOT-HS-7-01537<br />
01111175<br />
Human Factors Research, Inc. ffi117175<br />
DOT-HS-5-01204 cft]28177<br />
HSBC, University of North Ogl15l77<br />
Carollna<br />
DOT-H5-7-01698<br />
02115178<br />
Indiana University<br />
DOT-HS-5-01275<br />
National Pub. $er. Res. Inst.<br />
DOT-HS"6-01397<br />
Dunlap and Assoclates, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-7{1502<br />
University of North Carolina<br />
DOT-HS-7-01807<br />
Dunlap and Associates, lnc.<br />
DOT.H5-7-01796<br />
Health Safety Associate$, lnc.<br />
DOT.H5-7-01762<br />
Funds Usad<br />
(Thousands<br />
of Dollars)<br />
Start Pre.<br />
Flnieh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
06/30/75<br />
o4t3a77<br />
06/10/76<br />
12r'10n7<br />
10/19/76<br />
12115t77<br />
04t01t78<br />
Q4t01t7g<br />
09/30/77<br />
12130178<br />
09t23177<br />
03/31/78<br />
National Pub. Serv. Hes. Inst. Wl30ln<br />
DOT.HS-7-01766 0S30/79<br />
National Pub. $erv. Res. Inst. 10114176<br />
DOT-HS-7-01526 12tQ8t77<br />
Essex Corporation 0910U77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01702 09/08/78<br />
Applied$cienceAssociation 07115177<br />
DOT-HS-7-01635 07115177<br />
National Pub. Serv. Bes. Inst. 09127177<br />
DOT.HS-7-01735 09t27t78<br />
University of Mlchigan 06130175<br />
DOT-HS-5-01184 0?t28179<br />
PRC Systems Scionces Co. 09/30/75<br />
DOT-HS-6-01285 12131t77<br />
Publlc Management Services, 07128177<br />
f nc. Q7l28l7g<br />
DOT-HS-7-01508<br />
3366AJ Legal Constraints Relevant to Counter- University of Michigan 1't110176<br />
100<br />
mea$ure Development<br />
DOT-HS-7-01536<br />
03t01179<br />
74<br />
92<br />
62<br />
450<br />
40<br />
13<br />
97<br />
sg<br />
118<br />
51<br />
223<br />
49<br />
24<br />
156<br />
98<br />
99<br />
52<br />
165<br />
99<br />
82<br />
104<br />
90<br />
17<br />
n2
Program<br />
Code<br />
3366AK<br />
3366AM<br />
3366AO<br />
3372AA<br />
341 1AH<br />
341 1 BE<br />
34118N<br />
3411CD<br />
3411CF<br />
3411CH<br />
341 1CJ<br />
3411CL<br />
3411CM<br />
3411F8<br />
3411FC<br />
341 1 FD<br />
341 1 FE<br />
341 1 FF<br />
3411FG<br />
3411FH<br />
341 1 Fl<br />
Tltlo<br />
Public Acceptability of Highway Safety<br />
Countermeagures<br />
ldent, of General Deterrence Countermeasures<br />
for Unsafe Driving Actlons<br />
Standards Development and Qualification<br />
Testing for Speed-Measuring<br />
Devices<br />
National Energy Efflcient Driving<br />
System<br />
Buy Scientlf lc Literature<br />
Prototype National Accident Investigatlon<br />
Study<br />
Management Infonnatlon Syatem for<br />
Version ll of the Crash Program<br />
lmprovement of Narrow Oblect Accident<br />
Recon$tructi0n<br />
Research lnput for Computer Simulation<br />
of Automobile Collisions<br />
SMAC Collision $ubrouting<br />
Automatic lteration of $MAC Program<br />
Revlslon of $MAC Integratlon<br />
Algorithm<br />
$imulation Package to Perform Calculation<br />
of Collision Forces in SMAC<br />
NASS Data Collection Teams<br />
NASS Data Collectlon Teams<br />
NASS Data Collection Teams<br />
NASS Data Collectlon Tsam8<br />
NAS$ Data C,ollection Teams<br />
NAS$ Data Collectlon Teams<br />
NAS$ Data Collection Teams<br />
NAS$ Data Collection Teams<br />
Table Fl. (Contlnued)<br />
Contractol<br />
Conirac{ Numbsr<br />
Mathematica Policy Flesearch, QW27176<br />
lnc.<br />
99t27t77<br />
DoT-HS+01466<br />
Univer$ity of Michlgan<br />
DOT-HS-7-01797<br />
National Bureau of Standards<br />
DOT HS-7-01697<br />
National Pub. Sorv. Res, Inst.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01775<br />
Funds Used<br />
(fhousands<br />
of Dollars)<br />
Start Pr+<br />
Finieh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
w27t77<br />
w27t78<br />
08t24t77<br />
08t24tffi<br />
0$/30/77<br />
09/30/78<br />
American Ass'n. for Automotlveogt27t77<br />
Medicine<br />
09t27t77<br />
PO-7-3766<br />
University of Michigan<br />
DOT-H5.+00890<br />
McDonnell Douglas<br />
Automation<br />
PS7-3262<br />
Texas Transportatlon lnstitute<br />
DOT-HS-7-01656<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-7-01511<br />
IPA-YAU WU<br />
PA-4&2-5.01<br />
West Virginia UnlversitY<br />
DOT-HS-&01820<br />
CHI Associates<br />
DOT-HS-7'01545<br />
Control Data Corporatlon<br />
Po-7-3319<br />
IITRI<br />
DOT-HS-7-01738<br />
KAPPA<br />
DoT.H5-741739<br />
Franklin<br />
oor-Hs-7{1740<br />
SWRI<br />
DOT.HS-7{1741<br />
ofl1974<br />
0s/30/78<br />
01121t77<br />
03t21t77<br />
ffit?g,tn<br />
w29tn<br />
12116t7A<br />
02/0fl78<br />
07t2gt70<br />
07129t77<br />
1A15n7<br />
12t15178<br />
12113t78<br />
vst1lln<br />
0a17Fl<br />
08IlTITI<br />
09t30t77<br />
09/30/80<br />
09/30/z<br />
0s/30/80<br />
w30t77<br />
09/30/80<br />
oet3a77<br />
@t3otffi<br />
Univ. of Alabama at Montevalloo9l3Qt77<br />
DOT.H5-7-01742<br />
09/30/80<br />
Manag€m€nt Englneerlng aslwn<br />
DOT.HS-7-01743<br />
09/30/80<br />
State of Michlgan<br />
DOT-HS-7-01744<br />
KLD<br />
DOT.HS-7-0174S<br />
w30177<br />
09/30/80<br />
@l3Qt77<br />
0g/30/80<br />
53<br />
100<br />
30 30<br />
51<br />
2<br />
603 ss<br />
2<br />
14<br />
198<br />
35<br />
22<br />
18<br />
275<br />
129<br />
173<br />
134<br />
218<br />
130<br />
161<br />
137<br />
81
Program<br />
Code TIIIE<br />
3411FJ NASS Data Cotlection Teams<br />
34llFK NA$$ Data C,ollectlon Teams<br />
3411GA Accldent Causatlon Methodology Dev.<br />
for the National Accident Sampling<br />
3411G8 Establish Zone Center for the National<br />
Accident Sampling $y$tem<br />
3411GC Zone Center for National Accident<br />
Sampling System<br />
3411GE Zone Center for Natlonal Accident<br />
Sampling $y$tem<br />
3411GJ National Accldent Sampling System<br />
Sample Design Phases 2 and 3<br />
3411GL On-The-Job Training for NASS<br />
3411GM Accident Inve$tigationTraining<br />
Textbooks<br />
Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />
Coniractor<br />
Contract Numbet<br />
Texas Transportation Institute<br />
DOT-HS-7-01746<br />
Unlversity of Southern<br />
Californla<br />
DOT-HS-7-01747<br />
Indiana University Foundatlon o'Jtfim<br />
DOT-HS-7-01690<br />
w28t78<br />
Indiana University Foundation w22177<br />
DOT-HS-7-o1652<br />
ffit22t79<br />
Indiana University Foundation 08125t77<br />
DOT-H5-7-01653<br />
08t25t79<br />
Calspan Field Servlces, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS"7-01654<br />
3411GF Introduction to NAss Field Techniques Allen Corp. of America<br />
DOT-H5-7-01577<br />
3411GN<br />
3411GO<br />
3411GP<br />
3414AC<br />
3414FA<br />
3414F8<br />
3414FC<br />
3414FD<br />
3414FE<br />
3414FF<br />
3414FG<br />
3414FH<br />
E-10<br />
Buy Marklng Tape<br />
Driver Tralning Course<br />
Buy Cameras<br />
Tri-level Study of the Gauses of Traffic<br />
Accidents<br />
National Crash Severlty Study<br />
Natlonal Cresh Severity Study<br />
National Crash Severity $tudy<br />
Natlonal Crash Severlty $tudy<br />
Natlonal Crash Severity Study<br />
National Crash Sevefity Study<br />
Natlonal Cra8h Severity Study Quallty<br />
Control<br />
Computer<br />
System Design and<br />
Qsyslqpment<br />
westat, Inc,<br />
DOT'HS-7-01706<br />
Various<br />
Various<br />
The Traffic ln$titute. Northwestern<br />
University<br />
PO-7-3737<br />
York Tape and Label Corp.<br />
PO-7-3736<br />
Allen Corooration<br />
PO-7-3734<br />
Brenner<br />
PO-7-3758<br />
Ultrasystems, Inc.<br />
DOT.HS-FO1SEB<br />
University of Miami<br />
DOT-HS-S01389<br />
Calspan Corporatlon<br />
DOT-H5-6-01390<br />
Southwest Research Institute<br />
DOT-H5"6-01391<br />
Indiana University Foundation 07116176<br />
DOT.HS-F01392<br />
07t16t78<br />
H$Rl, University of Michigan<br />
Dor-H5-6-01393<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS+01442<br />
Gontrol Data Corporation<br />
DOT-H5,7-01531<br />
Funds Ussd<br />
(fhousands<br />
of Dollars)<br />
Start Pre.<br />
Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
ogt3Qt77<br />
09/30/80<br />
w30t77<br />
09/30/80<br />
og25l77<br />
owzil78<br />
oa18n7<br />
0819/79<br />
w30t77<br />
05/30/79<br />
11t04t77<br />
't1t04t77<br />
09114t77<br />
ogt14t77<br />
11104177<br />
11t04t77<br />
11103177<br />
11t0g77<br />
111O8t77<br />
11t0fl77<br />
Indiana University Foundation w15t72<br />
DOT-HS-034-3-s35 04130t77<br />
Q7t1il7ts<br />
07118178<br />
07/16/76<br />
07t16t78<br />
07t16t76<br />
07116178<br />
Q7t16t76<br />
07116t78<br />
07116176<br />
07t1H78<br />
05120176<br />
08t2u78<br />
10/19/76<br />
wo1t77<br />
400 164<br />
202<br />
160<br />
,346<br />
201<br />
173<br />
201<br />
120<br />
114<br />
209<br />
145<br />
74<br />
129<br />
113<br />
100<br />
189<br />
Program<br />
Gode Tltle<br />
3414F1 National Crash Severity Study<br />
3414FJ Narrow Bridge Collislon Sltes<br />
3414GA Accident Invest. Methodology to<br />
,A$sess Fole of Vehicle Handling in<br />
Highway SafetY<br />
3414G8 Accident Causalion and Accldent<br />
Avoidance<br />
3416A4 Motorcycle Accident Factors and<br />
ldentif lcation Countermeasures<br />
Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />
Conlractol<br />
Conlract Number<br />
341684 InvestigationofMotorVehicle/Bicycle University of Southern<br />
Collision Parameters<br />
California<br />
DOT-HS-541231<br />
3416CA Pedestrian Inlury Causstlon<br />
Parameters<br />
3416C8 PedestrianlnJuryCausation<br />
Parameterg<br />
3416CD Pedestrian Injury Causatlon<br />
Parameters<br />
3416CE Pedestrian Injury Causation<br />
Parameters<br />
3416DB<br />
3416DC<br />
Fleet Accident Evaluation of<br />
FMVSS 121<br />
121 Onsite Fleet Inspectlone<br />
3416EA Accident Analysis Breakaway and<br />
Nonbreakaway Poles and Standards<br />
on Highways<br />
3416FA Study of Driver Behavioral Errors in<br />
Alcohol, Marijuana and other Drug<br />
Involved Collisions<br />
3416GA Motor Vehicle Accident Investigation<br />
Research Study-D.C. Area<br />
3417AN Air Cushion Restraint System (ACRS)<br />
Accidents (N.E. Region)<br />
3il17AP Investigation of Air Cushlon Flestralnt<br />
System Accidents-Southwest Reg ion<br />
3417AO Investigation of Air Cushion Restraint<br />
System Accidents<br />
3421AM lmpact of Recent Changes in the<br />
Highway $afety Environment<br />
University of Kentucky<br />
DOT-HS-F01394<br />
FHWA<br />
DOT-H5-7-016081A<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-7-01575<br />
University of Michigan 09127177<br />
DOT-HS-7-01669 09t27t79<br />
University of Southern 11123175 100<br />
California<br />
DOT-HS-S01160<br />
121Q1179<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-H5-7-01579<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-H5-7-01s78<br />
Southwest Research Instltute<br />
DOT.HS-7-01580<br />
Traffic Safety Research C.orp.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01581<br />
University of Michigan<br />
DOT-HS-Fo1286<br />
Transportation Research and<br />
Marketing<br />
PO-7.3387<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-So1179<br />
Ultrasystems, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-6-01346<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT.HS-S01304<br />
Southwest Research lnstltuts<br />
DOT-H5-6-01309<br />
University of Miami<br />
DQT-HS-6-01315<br />
University of North Carolina<br />
DOT-HS-4-00897<br />
Funds Uted<br />
(fhousands ol DollarE]<br />
Start Pre'<br />
Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY n FY 78<br />
07/16/76<br />
07/16/78<br />
08130177<br />
06/30/78<br />
03/16/77<br />
06t16t78<br />
3416A8 lmpact of Motorcycle Usage In Kansas Univ. of Kansas Medlcal Center 01114177<br />
DOT-HS-7-01563<br />
12t31ln<br />
06/30/75<br />
06/30/78<br />
o4l1w77<br />
04/18/80<br />
04118t77<br />
04/18/BO<br />
04t1w77<br />
04/18/80<br />
Q4t18177<br />
04/1fl80<br />
ffil?6t75<br />
06/3,0/78<br />
o4tQAt77<br />
QAt04ln<br />
Southwest Research Institute 06/30/75<br />
DOT-HS-S01266 01131t78<br />
ffit23175<br />
06/23/78<br />
05120176<br />
05t20178<br />
't2123/75<br />
09/30/78<br />
01/0976<br />
09/30/78<br />
01129t76<br />
ww78<br />
ffi125174<br />
09/30/78<br />
140<br />
187<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
114<br />
635<br />
494<br />
18<br />
32<br />
92<br />
223<br />
210<br />
150 200 148<br />
151<br />
254<br />
275<br />
247<br />
96<br />
65<br />
86<br />
192<br />
491<br />
58<br />
100<br />
39<br />
87<br />
E-l1
Program<br />
Code Thle<br />
34218A Design of National Exposure Data<br />
System<br />
3/.22AO Fact Book<br />
34224P Injury Scaling R€search<br />
3422AQ National Exposure Data System<br />
(National Personal Trans. Sys. Data)<br />
3422AS Statistical Analysis of Crash<br />
Gonditions<br />
3422AT Adj. of Natlonal Center for Health<br />
Stat. Data<br />
g22AV Computer Support for Adjustment of<br />
NCHS Data<br />
3422AW Fact Book Data Management<br />
3422AX Computer Services tor HSRI Accident<br />
Data Files<br />
3423AH Data Sources to Support the NHTSA<br />
Defects I nvestigation System<br />
3423AV Data Retrieval and Artalvsis<br />
3423AW Truck Aecldent Study<br />
Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />
Gontractor<br />
Contract Number<br />
3423CH Est. the Effects of Crash-Fhase Center for the Environment<br />
FMVSS on Driver Fatality Risk in Z.Car and Man<br />
Collision<br />
PO-7-3261<br />
3425AC Procurement of Mortality Tapes<br />
34254E Purchase of Gencat Tape<br />
3425AG Buy Tabulatlons of Hlghway Safety<br />
Accident Data<br />
3431AH Reporting System<br />
3431C| Data Prep. of NHTSA Mutttdlsc. Acci.<br />
dent Investigation Reports<br />
3431CQ Computer Service$ for HSRI Accidenl<br />
Data Files<br />
University<br />
of Michigan<br />
DOT-H5-7-01685<br />
Various Contractors<br />
Various Contracts<br />
Universlty<br />
of North Carolina<br />
DOT-HS-7-01539<br />
FHWA<br />
DOT-HS-&01474tA<br />
3/'22AR Highway Safety Effects of the Energy University of Michigan<br />
Crisis on U.S. Toll Roads<br />
DOT-HS.4 00980<br />
University of Wisconsin 01106177<br />
DOT HS-7-01559 01/06/78<br />
Opportunity Systems (SBA) Wl30l76<br />
DOT-HS-6-01501 12t31t77<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management 10101176<br />
Sy$tems 09130177<br />
ADP-77-O71<br />
Automated Sclence Group, lnc. wHn<br />
DOT-HS-7-016M<br />
09/19/78<br />
Universlty of Michigan<br />
PO-8-0103<br />
Universlty of Michigan<br />
DOT-HS-7-01804<br />
System$ and Applied Sclences 04t01t77<br />
Corporation<br />
07t15t77<br />
DOT-HS-6-01507<br />
Unlversity of $outhern<br />
Calllornla<br />
DOT-HS-7-01565<br />
HEW, U.S. Div. of Vital<br />
$tatistics<br />
PO-8-0104<br />
Richard Landis, Universlty<br />
of<br />
North Carolina<br />
PO-7-3295<br />
HSRC, University of<br />
North Carolina<br />
DOT-HS-7-01757<br />
Control Data C,orporatlon<br />
DOT-HS-5-01183<br />
Unlversity of Michigan<br />
DOT"HS-5-01134<br />
Univsrsily of Michigan Office<br />
of Besearch Admin.<br />
PO.7-03001<br />
Funds Ueod<br />
(Thousands<br />
ol Dollars)<br />
Stail Pre.<br />
Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />
08t09t77<br />
08/09/78<br />
06/28/76<br />
06/?8/77<br />
11tfit7B<br />
o?t2w7B<br />
09/30/76<br />
0g/30/78<br />
00/00/00<br />
02101t77<br />
1Qt01t77<br />
10tQ1t77<br />
09130177<br />
03/30/78<br />
o?/08fi7<br />
01i07i78<br />
01t2Qt77<br />
10t20t77<br />
111O4t77<br />
11104177<br />
aao1t77<br />
ozt01t77<br />
07t19t77<br />
07119t78<br />
06/30/75<br />
01t01t77<br />
04t17t75<br />
06/30/78<br />
11101t76<br />
11t01t77<br />
88<br />
136<br />
47<br />
367 295<br />
Program<br />
Code<br />
Tlilc<br />
34328S ADP Time Sharing<br />
34il2DF Source Document Data Convsrslon<br />
for Fatal Accident Reportlng System<br />
3432DS FAHSMalntenancs<br />
34il2DT Fatal Accldent Reporting System<br />
State Contracts<br />
3432DW Fatal Accldent Heportlng System<br />
Maintenance<br />
3432DY NCSA-Remote Data Entry Trainlng<br />
Sesslon<br />
3432HF Multidlsciplinary Acc. Inv. Data File<br />
3432JE StatB Access to National Deta Bases<br />
34il2JF LexlcographerProgramTape<br />
34tl2JK Health Int€rvl€$, $urvey Data<br />
3432L8 Lease Fenewal whh eomputer Fro<br />
duct. Unlimited for Terminale<br />
3511AH lmproved Passenger Car Braklng<br />
Performance<br />
3511DE Collision Avoidance Radar Braklng<br />
System<br />
3511DF Long Life grake System<br />
3511DJ Collislon Avoldance Radar Braklng<br />
$ystem<br />
3511EF Tecfrnical FieldSupPon-Brak€<br />
System Testing<br />
3511E| Purchase of Beechwood Mobile Home<br />
3511EJ BuY Car for Test<br />
3511EK Buy Gar for Test<br />
Table E-i. (Contlnued)<br />
, Conlraclol<br />
Contract Numbor<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/70<br />
Systems<br />
ogt3oI77<br />
ADP-77051<br />
Institute of Modern Proce<br />
dures. SBA<br />
DOT-HS-il10€0<br />
GTE Inlormation Systerng<br />
Various Orders<br />
Each State, D.C. and Puerto<br />
Bico<br />
Various Contract8<br />
$igma Data Serylcg<br />
Po-7-3776<br />
Various Invoices<br />
University of Mlchlgan<br />
DoT.HS-eo1303<br />
Control Data Corporatlon-<br />
OMS<br />
ADP-77-066<br />
Duallabs, Arllngton, Va.<br />
PO.7-3342<br />
National Center for Statistics<br />
and Analysis<br />
PO-7-3594<br />
NHTSA, Offlce of Management<br />
Sy$lems<br />
Po+0215<br />
University of Michigan<br />
DOT-HS-S013SB<br />
Bendix Besearch Lab.<br />
DOT-HS-S014s0<br />
Scienc€ Applicatlon<br />
DOT-HS741776<br />
Bendix Research Lab.<br />
DoT-HS-+01450<br />
Aberdeen Proving Grounds<br />
DoT-HS-S01033<br />
Koons Pontiac-Olds-GMG<br />
Truck, Inc.<br />
Po-7-4677<br />
Dave<br />
ryle$ Lincoln-Mercury<br />
Pc-74727<br />
Sport Chevrolet<br />
Pc-7-4726<br />
Fundr Used<br />
(Thourands ol Drollaru)<br />
Stlrt PIF<br />
Flnlah FY 76 FY 7e Ff n Ff 7t<br />
o1/oa75<br />
o2l21l7E<br />
w23tTl<br />
05123177<br />
03t11177<br />
03t11177<br />
wwft<br />
wffit77<br />
11t16ln<br />
't1n6ln<br />
0111?/76<br />
uha77<br />
10/01/76<br />
09/30/z<br />
ffi|11m<br />
o3t11ln<br />
07113177<br />
07r13ln<br />
12t15lTl<br />
12115t77<br />
06n7n6<br />
12/31n7<br />
0g/15/7e<br />
10115t77<br />
EtNl77<br />
ory30/78<br />
0ry1fl70<br />
lw15tzi<br />
0901/74<br />
00/30/78<br />
07114177<br />
07t14tn<br />
w27t77<br />
wr27l77<br />
w19t7f<br />
wfiln<br />
ss<br />
50<br />
1S2<br />
36<br />
1S4<br />
386<br />
386<br />
85<br />
1,098<br />
83<br />
28<br />
1,292<br />
91<br />
'<br />
Program<br />
Code Tlil6<br />
Tabfe E 1. (Continuefl<br />
Funds Used<br />
(fhousands of Dollare)<br />
Contractor Stan Pr€.<br />
Contract Number Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 Fl TB<br />
3511EL Development of Dual Ma$ter Cylinder U.S. Army Meradcom,<br />
Stroke for Brake Fluids Ft. Belvoir<br />
DOT-H5-7-01760<br />
QgnA77<br />
ffit?A7g<br />
15<br />
3511EM Safety Research Lab. Brakes*$mall Various Ogl3}l77 N<br />
Purchases Various P.O.'s 0,9i30177<br />
351?AD Tire Break-in Procedures for Handling Texas A&M Research 06/30/75 125 31<br />
Tests Foundation<br />
DOT-HS-5-01189<br />
02128177<br />
3512AF Development of Vehicle Rollover Calspan Corporation 06/30/76 146<br />
Maneuver DOT-HS-6-01382 07131177<br />
3512AH Steering Controllability Characterlstlcs University of Michigan 06/30/76 SS I<br />
DOT"HS-6-01409 09t?1t77<br />
3512A1 Power Steering Failure Study Systems Technology, lnc. 06130,78 47<br />
DOT-HS-F01428 OEI3A77<br />
3512AK Mathematlcal Models for $imulation University of Michigan 0gl30l77 136<br />
of Vehicle Handling DOT-HS-7-01715 0113'1178<br />
351285 Handling Test Procedures for Passen- Systems Technology, lnc. 12115t76 50<br />
ger Cars Pulling Trallers DOT-HS-7-01548 cFi30l77<br />
35128V Solid State Data Acquisition and Pro- Systems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75 261 12<br />
cessing System DOT-HS-S01212 0212W77<br />
35128W Evaluation and Correlation of Driver/ $ystems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75 99 41<br />
Vehicle Data DOT-HS-5-01200 03131177<br />
35128X Influence of Aerodynamic Dlsturbance Systems Technology, Inc. 07120176 160 36<br />
on Vehicle Handling DOT-H$-6-0'1403 12131177<br />
35128Y Truck and Trailer Yaw Divergence and HSRI, University of Michigan 05119177 259<br />
Flollover DOT-HS"7-01602 11119178<br />
3512B,2 Transfer Test Vehicles Texas Transoortation lnstltute 01110177 I<br />
BL-L-0302144 01t10t77<br />
3512CF Support by the Hybrid Vehlcle Han' NHTSA, Office of Management Q3116177 116<br />
dling Program $ystems Ogl30l77<br />
ADP-77-065<br />
3512CK Mobile Parametrlc Measuremeni Dynamic Sclence, Inc. O?t1gt?B 12S 52<br />
Device DOT-HS-6-01413 1A3OI77<br />
3512CN ADP Support NHTSA, Office of Management 10/05/76 10<br />
Systems 09/30177<br />
ADP-77-053<br />
351?EA Accident Avoldance Capabllltles of Systems Tochnology, Inc. Ogl0glTI 90<br />
Mopeds DOT-HS-7-01719 111CFi78<br />
3512E8 Advanced Motorcycle Handling and South Coast Technology 0912W77 121<br />
Dynamics DOT-HS-7-01722 W2W78<br />
3512EC Development of Low Cost Antl-Lock Harry Diamond Lab.-Dept. of 1A02176 ,13<br />
Brake System for Small Motorcycles the Army<br />
DOT-HS.7.01524tA<br />
1210A77<br />
3512ED Motorcycle Handling Systems Technology, Inc. 07t22176 148 38<br />
DOT-HS-F01381 0a15t7g<br />
3512FA Hlghway Aerodynamlc Interference$ Virginia Polytechnic Inslltuie 04108,77 25<br />
DOT-HS-7-01590 0408t78<br />
E-14
Program<br />
Code<br />
Thlc<br />
3513CL TreadwearValidation<br />
3513m NDT Foad Correlation<br />
3513KA Truck Tlre Braklng and Cornering<br />
Traction StudY<br />
3513KE Safety Research Lab.<br />
Tires-$mall Purchases<br />
Table E 1. (Gontinued)<br />
,<br />
Contractol<br />
Contrac{ Humbor<br />
3512GA Aerodynamlc Disturbance Test Proc+ Systems Technology, Inc'<br />
dure DeveloPment<br />
DOT'HS'7-01716<br />
w30/77<br />
03/30/79<br />
3li12GB Car-TrailerHandllngStandards<br />
Development<br />
Systems TechnologY, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01720<br />
w?7t77<br />
111?7t78<br />
35138G Non-DestructiveTireTestlng Transportation System$ Centel 10/01/76<br />
PPA-HS-703<br />
ww77<br />
Nevada Auto Test C€nter<br />
DOT.HSff1347<br />
Hodges Transportation, Ino,<br />
DOT-HS-7-01589<br />
HSRI, University of Michigan<br />
DoT-HS-7-01609<br />
3513KC Modify Traction Information Processing Control Data Qorporation<br />
system (IlPs) PO'7'9630<br />
3513KD Tlre Treadwear TeBt Multlcycle Te$tlng Transportatlon Testlng' Inc.<br />
of Texas<br />
DOT-HS-7-01710<br />
Various<br />
Variou$<br />
3514A8 Vehicle Anti-Theft Security System A.D' Little' lnc.<br />
Design<br />
DOT-HS-7'01723<br />
3515AF Automotive Radar Research Dept' of Commerce<br />
DOT-HS-S01375<br />
3515AG Erectrrcar system rntesrrty<br />
t[TI[ l;:??'ft<br />
3515AH Electrical System Integrity Coleman Cadillac Co.<br />
Buy Cadillac Seville<br />
DOT'HS &01845<br />
3521AB Drlver Visibility Requirements Quallty Human Factors Research, Inc.<br />
of Visibility<br />
DOT'HS+01426<br />
35218F Evaluation of Glare from Followlng Rowland and Company<br />
Vehicle Headlights<br />
DOT'HS-7'01540<br />
3521CC Development of a visibility Research unlversity of calilornia, L-A.<br />
DOT-HS-+01451<br />
35210F Utlllty of Perlpheral Vlslon to Motor Ohio State Universlty<br />
Vehicle Drivers<br />
DOT-HS,S01203<br />
3521DG Critical Incldent Study of Vehicle Crash Dunlap and Assoclates<br />
Avoidance $ystems<br />
DoT-HS-5-01216<br />
3521DJ R€arview Mirror Systems for Pass. Cars, Vector Enterpri$es<br />
Lt. Trucks, and Multipurpose Pass. Veh. DOT-HS-7-01721<br />
3521DL Data Analyse$ of Drlver/Vehicle lnter- Vector Enterprises<br />
action Problems<br />
Po,7-3431<br />
Funds Usad<br />
(fhoueands of f}ollaru)<br />
Start Pre.<br />
Flnish FY 76 FY 76 F'{ Tl Ff 7E<br />
w14tn<br />
01/1fl78<br />
03tzsi.77<br />
03|/29/78<br />
3513CP Flnancial Support for the Second lnter- Transportation Research Board 12t17176<br />
nationalskidPreventionConference PO'7-3216<br />
12J17t78<br />
3513JC $now Tlre Test Program Nevada Auto Test Center<br />
DOT-HS-S01318<br />
1 1 /30/76<br />
0?i2w77<br />
3522AL Field Test Evaluation of Rear Lighting Essex Corporation<br />
and Slgnaling Systems<br />
DOT-HS'+01228<br />
Mlnl77<br />
02t22t78<br />
08t01177<br />
oStutn<br />
QgtO2l77<br />
03t03t78<br />
ffil3CIm<br />
w30t77<br />
wlw77<br />
0g/30/78<br />
07lozt7B<br />
07to1l77<br />
wr3a7l<br />
0s/3078<br />
121aot77<br />
1?12A77<br />
ofl30/76<br />
utw77<br />
11t23116<br />
wt2a77<br />
ost28177<br />
07131t77<br />
o6t23175<br />
07131t77<br />
06/19/75<br />
ozlA&t77<br />
w28177<br />
092979<br />
Mt26t77<br />
07t26t77<br />
06/30/75<br />
w31177<br />
64<br />
100<br />
353<br />
23<br />
75<br />
95<br />
45<br />
132 40<br />
201<br />
1S<br />
250<br />
58<br />
111<br />
10<br />
100<br />
10<br />
83<br />
56<br />
116<br />
155<br />
33<br />
15<br />
't78<br />
Program<br />
Code<br />
Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />
Funds Usod<br />
(Ihousands ol Dollars)<br />
Contractor Start Pre-<br />
Crontract Numbsr Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
3522AN Dev. and Field Testing of Techniques H$Rl, University of Michigan Q212A177 76 108<br />
for Increasing Conspicuity of Motorcycles<br />
and Motorcycle Drivers<br />
DOT-HS-6-01459 QW16l77<br />
3522AO Evaluation of the Feasibillty of a University of Michigan 1A2?176 61<br />
Single Beam Headlight DOT-HS-7-01554 01122178<br />
3522AP Low Beam Shaping for lmproved Wlde Human Factor$ Research<br />
Angle Roadway lllumination Corporation<br />
DOT-H5-7-01724<br />
09114177<br />
11114178<br />
79<br />
35228H Validation of the Rear Lighting and Allen Corp. of America Wl3Ol77 40 60<br />
Signaling System Fleld Test DOT-HS-7-01756 05/30/79<br />
3522CC Field Test Evaluation of Rear Lighting University of lllinols 09/16/76 179 /m<br />
Deceleration Signals DOT-HS-6-01447 05/16/78<br />
3522EA Signal Lighting Requirements for Emer- Unlversity of Michigan 09/1476 50<br />
gency Schoolbus and Service Vehicles DOT-H$-6-01468 09114177<br />
3522E8 Analytical Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Franklln Institute @120176 49 5<br />
Fog Countermeasures DOT-HS-F0149S 12116177<br />
35?3AP Human Factors Requiremente for Wayne State Universlty 07114177 S1 10<br />
Flngertlp Reach Controls DOT-HS"5-01 192 0fl31177<br />
3523AQ Driver-Vehicle Effectiveness Model Honeywell, Inc. 03/1fl76 128<br />
Phases ll and lll DOT-HS-6-01319 ffi1fr178<br />
3523AS Development of Recommendatlons to Man Factors, Inc. 0nZA76 83 2<br />
lmprove Control Operability DOT-HS-S01445 1112?J77<br />
35?3AT Development of a Standardized Vehi- Planning and Human $y$tems, 11/30/76 80<br />
cle ldentification Number Inc.<br />
DOT-H5-7-01541<br />
Qgl30l77<br />
3523AX VIN Experiment Servlco$ California Dept. of Motor 0Fr1fr177 1<br />
Vehicles<br />
PO-7-3574<br />
08130177<br />
3523AY Buy Replacement Bulbs General Electrlc Company 02128t77
Program<br />
Code Tltlo<br />
Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />
Conlractor<br />
Contraa Numbar<br />
3523FO Modification to DPMAS Data Process- NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/76<br />
Ing<br />
System$<br />
ADF-77-070<br />
09t30t77<br />
3523FQ Computer Terminal for DPMA$<br />
3532AA ADF Support for Automotlve Fuel<br />
Economy Research<br />
3532A8 Rental and Installatlon Computer<br />
Device Model 1132<br />
3532AG Support for Analytical Tools for AFE<br />
Activities<br />
3532AD Support for Analytlcal Tools for AFE<br />
Activities<br />
35328A AFER Program Support-T$G<br />
3532DA Fleview Procedure lor Determlnlng<br />
Average Fuel Economy<br />
3534AA Corporate Strategles of Automotive<br />
Manufacturers<br />
3534A8 Corporate Strategies of Automotlve<br />
Manufacturers<br />
3535AA lmpact of Auto Fuel Economy Stand. Charles Biver Assoc.<br />
ards on Competition in the AutomotlveDOT.HS-7-01786<br />
lndustry<br />
3535A8 lmpact of Auto Fuel Economy Stand- A. T. Kearney<br />
ards on Competition in the AutomotiveDOT-HS-7-01787<br />
lndustry<br />
353588 Consumer Behavlor Towards Fuel Effi.<br />
cient Vehicles<br />
35358C Consumer Behavior Towards Fuel Efficlent<br />
Vehicles<br />
353580 Consumer Behavior Towards Fuel Etflcient<br />
Vehicles<br />
3535CA lmpacts ot Fuel Efflclent Vehlcles<br />
3541AA Truck, Bus, and Motorcycle Safety<br />
Status Methodology<br />
Texas Institute<br />
PO-7.3550<br />
NHTSA, Off ice of Management10/01/76<br />
Systems<br />
09130t77<br />
ADP-77-072<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/76<br />
Systems<br />
ogt3il77<br />
PO-7-3462<br />
H.H. Aerospace Deslgn<br />
Company<br />
DOT-HS-7-01691<br />
Transportation Systems Center 10101t76<br />
PPA.HS.727<br />
w30t77<br />
3532CA Augmentation of Res. and Anal. Capa- Corporate Tech. Planning<br />
bllities for TimelY Support ol AFE DOT-H5-7-01789<br />
Activities<br />
3532C8 Augmentation of Res. and Anal. Capa- South Coast<br />
bilities for Timely Support of AFE<br />
Activities<br />
DOT-HS-7-01790<br />
Envlronmgntal lrnpact Csnter<br />
DOT-HS-7-01771<br />
Harbridge House, lnc.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01783<br />
Futures Group<br />
DOT-HS-7-01784<br />
35358A Consumer Behavior Toward$ Fuel Effi- Charles River A$$oc.<br />
cient Vehicles<br />
DoT-Hs-7-01779<br />
Cambridge Systematics<br />
DOT-HS-7-01780<br />
Market Fact8<br />
DOT-HS-7-01781<br />
National Analysts<br />
DOT-HS.7-01782<br />
Gharles River Assoc.<br />
ooT.Hs-7-01778<br />
Indians University Foundation 06/30/76<br />
DOT-HS-Fo1357<br />
o$t30177<br />
Funds Used<br />
(thousands ol Dollars)<br />
Start Pre.<br />
Flnith FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7A<br />
ffit24177<br />
Q6t24177<br />
@106t77<br />
09/06/78<br />
Automated Sciences GrouP, Inc. @to7tTl<br />
DoT-HS.7-01708<br />
09107t78<br />
09t3w77<br />
0s/30/78<br />
09/30/77<br />
0s/30/78<br />
wwrT<br />
03/31/79<br />
09130177<br />
03/31/79<br />
QSt30t77<br />
03t30t79<br />
09130t77<br />
03/31/79<br />
wwzl<br />
03/31/79<br />
09t30t77<br />
03131179<br />
09t30t77<br />
03/31/79<br />
09t30177<br />
03131175<br />
w30177<br />
03/31/79<br />
09130t77<br />
03131175<br />
139<br />
20<br />
110<br />
#<br />
48<br />
4,600<br />
N7<br />
249<br />
1afi<br />
50<br />
50<br />
190<br />
212<br />
159<br />
210<br />
93<br />
142<br />
184<br />
E-17
Program<br />
Code TItle<br />
S5ltlAC ADP Support<br />
3541AD ADP Support<br />
3541EA Salety Status Data Collectlon Methodology<br />
3541EC On-Road Vehicle Failure Study-Data<br />
Analysis<br />
3541ED State PMVI Program Evaluation<br />
3541FA Vehicles-ln-Use Sub-Llmlt Maneuvers<br />
3541FF MVI Evaluation and Data Analy$i$<br />
3541FG Multl-Vehlcle Program, Vehicles-ln-Use<br />
$ub-Limit Maneuver, Spring Spacers<br />
3541FH Computer Support Effort by Hybrid<br />
Vehicle Handling Program<br />
3542DC Optimized Brake Inspection<br />
3542DD Correlation of Braking System Defect$<br />
and Performance Insoection<br />
3542DF Tire Inspection Machine Completion<br />
and Validation<br />
3542DH Modification to CSC Technical Support<br />
Contract<br />
3551AA Advanced Flecorder Design Development<br />
3551AC IBM 545 Output Keypunch Rental<br />
3$51AD Advanc€d Recorder Design Developmenl<br />
3611AE Engineering Support to tho R$V<br />
3631AG FlBsearch Safety Vehicle Phase ll<br />
3631AH Research Safety Vehicle Phase ll<br />
3E31AJ Flesearch Safety Vehicle Phase lll<br />
3631AK Flos€arch Safety Vehicle Phase lll,<br />
Minicars<br />
E.l8<br />
Table E.l. (Continue0<br />
Contractor<br />
Contract Number<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management o3lo8l77<br />
Systems<br />
03108177<br />
ADP-76-001<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management10/0fl76<br />
Sy$tems<br />
wl3u77<br />
ADP-77-052<br />
AVCO Systems Dlvlslon<br />
DOT-HS-s-01159<br />
U.S. SBA Opportunlty Sysiemg 03/01/75<br />
DOT"HS-5-01063<br />
09t15t77<br />
Chilton Company<br />
DOT-H5-7-01544<br />
Systems Technology, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-5-01191<br />
Automated Sciences GrouP,<br />
Inc, (SBA)<br />
DOT-HS-S01338<br />
Systems Technology, Inc.<br />
DOT-H5-7-01799<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management 10/01/78<br />
Systems<br />
09/30/78<br />
ADP-7-8105<br />
Ultrasystems, Inc,<br />
DOT-H$-Fo1383<br />
University of Tennesseo<br />
DOT-HS-7-01621<br />
$outhwest Research ln$t.<br />
DOT-H5-7-01693<br />
Computer Sciences Corp,<br />
DOT-H5-5-01036<br />
Teledyne Geo. Tech.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01641<br />
$ystemg<br />
PO-7-3195<br />
i<br />
Dynamic $cience, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01640<br />
Transportation Systems Center<br />
PPA HS"717<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-5-01214<br />
Minicars, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-5-01215<br />
Cal$pan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-7-01551<br />
Minicars, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-7-01552<br />
Funde Ueed<br />
(Thousands<br />
ol Dollars)<br />
Start Pre-<br />
Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
1212't176<br />
05t31t77<br />
o3l07l77<br />
03107178<br />
01l1w77<br />
0428177<br />
01131177<br />
03131177<br />
09t3il77<br />
03/31/79<br />
06t29t76<br />
1ATr77<br />
06t07177<br />
ffito7t7B<br />
09/28/77<br />
11t28177<br />
11105174<br />
08104177<br />
ffit29177<br />
ffit29l7B<br />
NHTSA, Office of Management 12109176<br />
01101177<br />
ffit?f,fil<br />
ffit?s,/78<br />
10t01176<br />
w30/77<br />
07116t75<br />
w15177<br />
07t16175<br />
01t31177<br />
ffitoN77<br />
10t26t78<br />
ffit08177<br />
01t2H79<br />
152<br />
12<br />
189<br />
981<br />
78<br />
70<br />
72<br />
176<br />
1,75Q 3,138<br />
1,845 3,359<br />
12<br />
36<br />
37<br />
15<br />
202<br />
Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />
(rrr""::l#<br />
lif"rr","r<br />
Program Contractor Stert Pte<br />
Code Tttle Conlrac{ Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />
3631AN1 GFE-Two 77 Chevrolet 4-door lmpalas Holiday Olds Company<br />
for Crash Testlng RSV Phase ll Minl- PO'7'4521<br />
cars Mod.4 Requirement<br />
01127177<br />
01127177<br />
6<br />
3ffi1ANe GFE-Two 77 Chevrolet 4-door lmpalas Holiday Olds Company<br />
for Crash Testing RSV Phase ll Mini- PO'74522<br />
cars Mod.4 Requirement<br />
12107176<br />
01127177<br />
6<br />
36II1AP GFE-4 Chevrolet lmpala Care Varlous<br />
Various<br />
06/30/77<br />
06130177<br />
11<br />
3631A0 Purchase Five Honda Civic Cars Various O7tW77 6<br />
Various 07lOEt77<br />
3662AU Shipment and Preservation of Govern- Minicars, Inc. 01110177 2<br />
ment Owned Test Equipment INV'106+1 01110177<br />
366388l Transport of Government Proparly North Amerlcan Van Llnss 0/'I?W77 4<br />
8/1030199 04t2a77<br />
3663882 Transport of Government Property North American Van Lines 04l2fln
Program<br />
Code Tlrla<br />
Table Fl' (continued)<br />
Funda used<br />
(fhousande ol Dottarr)<br />
Conlractor Start Pre.<br />
Contract Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY f7 FY 78<br />
37138Y Optimum lntegration Algorithm into CHI Associates QBl27l77 48<br />
Structural Analysis Programs DOT-HS-7.01620 00127178<br />
3713C8 Evaluation of Flollover Procedures Dynamic Science, lnc. 07/01176 71 10<br />
DOT-HS-6-01427 07tl1t77<br />
3713GE Llghtweight Subcompact Side $tructure The Budd Company O411il77 498 140<br />
DOT-HS-7-01588 10/1378<br />
3713GG Purchase of Cars for Slde lmpact Various Dealers O7lffil77 34<br />
Testing Various P.O.'s 0711W77<br />
3713KD Data Processlng for Contract DOT"H$ NHTSA, Offlce of Manegement 10/01/76 160<br />
7-01628 Systems<br />
ADP-77-050<br />
Wl3rl/77<br />
3713LF Vehlcle Aggressiveness and Crash Approved Engineerlng Test 03/18f/8 n<br />
Survivablllty Characteristics Labs<br />
DOT-HS-F01477<br />
03/18/78<br />
3713LG Vehicle Aggressiverress and Crash Dynamic Science, Inc. Ogt1W77 29<br />
$urvivability Characteristics OOT-HS-6-01478 03/1&,78<br />
3714AF Evaluation of Structural Aggresslve- Calspan Corporation 02128175 181 158 204 I<br />
ness of Intermediate Size Automobiles DOT-H$-+010S9 Q5131177<br />
3714AH Dev. of Test Anal. Methodologies for Dynamlc Science, Inc. 0F/30177 90<br />
Eval. Crash Compatibilities and<br />
Aggressiveness<br />
DOT-HS-7-01758 0S/30/78<br />
3714AM Buy Cars to Support Task Orders for Varioue 0il26177 44 18<br />
Car-To-Car and Car-to-Barrier lmpact<br />
Testing<br />
Various P.O.'s 0512d77<br />
3714AR Purchase Cars Varlous Oilfiln 40<br />
Various 03121177<br />
3715AD Buy Minicomputer Modem Equipment Digital Equipment Corp. 1AOH7E 1<br />
PO-7-3146 12/0d76<br />
3715AE Buy Minicomputer Peripheral Equip- Digital Equipment Corp. 07129177 53<br />
ment PO-7-3628 07129177<br />
3716A8 lmproved Vlslblllty for School Buses Ultrasystems, Inc. Cf,./17t7} S0<br />
During Adverse Weather DOT-HS-6-01398 06117177<br />
3716AC ldentification of Superior Energy"<br />
. Absorbing Materials for School Bus<br />
lnteriors<br />
A$L Englneering, Inc.<br />
DOT-HS-7-016M<br />
OBlO3l77<br />
08/03/78<br />
1#l<br />
3716AD $chool Bus Occupani Retroflt Protec- New Mexico State Univ. WOTln<br />
tive Materials DOT-HS-7-01572 O2lO7l7A<br />
3716AF Cra$h Protection $ystems for Handi- Minicars, Inc. Wfiln<br />
capped school Bus occupants DOT-HS-7-01774 03/01/79<br />
3716AG Defogging Test Procedures Valldatlon Approved Engineerlng Testing 07126177<br />
Laboratory 0712W77<br />
371EBA Transportation Ftre safety Prosram ;:-""t:l--^avanced rech- o1tz7t7o E0<br />
nology Divisfon<br />
DOT-HS-FOI313IA<br />
Q1127177<br />
3721DH Web Locker Tests in Torinos Allied Chemical Corp. Ogt31l77<br />
Automotive Product Div.<br />
PO-7 3384<br />
03131177<br />
E.20<br />
62<br />
70<br />
10<br />
10
Program<br />
Code<br />
Tlllc<br />
Table El. (Contlnuedl<br />
Funds Used<br />
(Thougsnds<br />
of D,ollars)<br />
Conlractor Start Pre-<br />
Contrac{ Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY fO FY 77 FY 78<br />
3722AD Evaluatlon of GM Air flushion Restraint Calspan Corporation 0812W74 97 39 13<br />
Svstem DoT-HS-s01017 1ail176<br />
3722AE Vehicle Integratlon and Evaluatlon oi Dynamic Science, Inc. 03112176 83 85<br />
Passive Small Car Fle$traint Systems DOT-HS-F01307 1A15177<br />
3722A1 Solid Propellant Inflation System for Minicars, Inc. 0712A76 337<br />
Inflatable Festraints for Subcompact$ DOT-HS-S01384 07128178<br />
3722AL Basic Ordering Agreement Evaluation Galspan Corporation<br />
of Occupant Protectlon Devices and DOT-HS-6-01470<br />
Re8traint $ystems<br />
'l1l11l7B<br />
11111177<br />
3722AM Purchase Cars for Test various 02114177 ?7<br />
Various Q2114177<br />
3722AN R€stralnt System Ferformance Evalua- Dynamic Science, Inc. 11123178 63<br />
tion of ACR$ Equipped Volvo Sedans DOT-HS-7-01542<br />
'11123177<br />
3722AP Restraint System Performance Evalua- Various Ogl15l77 66<br />
tion of ACRS Equipped Volvo Sedans- Various<br />
Buy Cars<br />
W11fl77<br />
3722AQ Evaluation of Occupant Protectlon De Varlous<br />
vices and Re$traint Systems-<br />
Buy Cars<br />
Various Orders Q7111177<br />
3722AR Hlgh Spesd Data Communicatlon Office of Management $ys- 11/15/76 3<br />
Printer tems. General Electric<br />
P+7-3121<br />
11115178<br />
3722Af Purchase 1973 Chevrolet Fleet Test<br />
Cars (6 Vehicles)<br />
PH&H, Baltimore, Md.<br />
PO-7-456o<br />
O2lQ4l77<br />
Q21o4177<br />
I<br />
3722AU Integrated Vehicle Colllslon/Occupant General Electrlc Info. Services 04104177<br />
'lB<br />
Model Sales Deot.<br />
DOT-OS-60058<br />
07123177<br />
3722AV Data Processing Service NHT$A, Office of Management 10/01/76 20<br />
$ystems<br />
ADP-77-089<br />
Wl3A77<br />
g722AYAdvancedPassiveHe3traints|nt+Vo|voofAmerica12]o7l77<br />
gration Fo-e5020 12lo7ln<br />
3722M Purchase 1977 Simca 1308GT Chrysler Corporation ffi117177 5<br />
FG7-4715 0g2?J77<br />
37228M Dev. of Aspiratlon Inflatlon Technique Calspan Corporatlon 06/30/75 186 210<br />
for Subcompact Passenger Car DOT-HS-$01254 WW77<br />
37228N Instalt Driver Alr Bag and Column in Dynamic $cience, Inc. 03/0fl75 61 128 74<br />
Oldsmobile DOT-HS-S01104 WI3OI77<br />
3722ElR $mall Car Driver Inflatable Restralnt Minicars, lnc. CEOA76 149 128 74<br />
System Evaluation DOT-HS-F01412 05/31/78<br />
g722BS Subcompact Vehicle Energy-Absorblng Minicars, Inc. 00/1fl76 111 56<br />
Steering Column Evaluation and lmprovement<br />
Phase ll<br />
OOT-HS-S01449 0315/78<br />
37228U Buy Cars for Use on Aeplratlon Inlla- Delawere Motors (1975 Volvo) Uilnm 5<br />
tion Teohnlque study Po-7-4604 0?/21177<br />
37228V Small Car Driver Inflatable Restraint Various Contractors O312il77 42<br />
System Evaluation Various Ogl25l77<br />
141<br />
E-21
Progrsm<br />
Code Tlrl€<br />
37228W Subcompact Vehicle Energy Absorbing<br />
Steering Column Evaluation and<br />
lmprovement<br />
37228X Buy Vehicles-Energy Absorbing<br />
Steering Column Evaluation and<br />
lmprovement<br />
3722FA Purchase of Cars for Evaluation of<br />
OccuPant Protection Devices<br />
3723CF1 Buy VIP-95 Dummie$<br />
3723CFZ BUY VIP-95 Dummies<br />
3723CG Buy VIP-3C Dummie$<br />
3723CH Buy Sierra Dummies<br />
3723C1 Buy Alderson Dumml€s<br />
3724AG Development and Evaluatlon of a<br />
Forc+Limiter {or Belt Restraint<br />
$Ystems<br />
g724AH Buy Films-MVP Contract<br />
3724AJ Obtaln HSRI Software Package<br />
3724AK Belt Restraint System for Small Gars<br />
Using Force Limiting<br />
3731AJ Mass Distribution Characterlstlcs of<br />
Living Human Beings<br />
3731AK Crash Vlctim Simulator Data<br />
3731AL Experimental Data for Valldatlng<br />
Finite Ele Model of Thoraclc Skeletal<br />
Flesponse<br />
3731AM Mass Distribution Characteristics o{<br />
Children<br />
3731 BL Mouthoiece Accelerometer and Rotational<br />
Acceleration Calihrator<br />
37318M Perfermance Evaluation of Part 572<br />
Dummy<br />
37318N Mouthoiece Accelerometer and Rotational<br />
Acceleration Calibrator<br />
373180 Estab. Msmt. Meth. & Calib. Capablllty<br />
of Dual Rate of Turn Table<br />
37318P Safety Fesearch Lab-Restraints<br />
Small Purchases<br />
E-22<br />
Table E-l. (Contlnue0<br />
Contractor<br />
Contract Number<br />
Blrmingham University 1?11fl76<br />
Birmingham, England<br />
PO-7-3213<br />
12115177<br />
Riverside Chrysler Plymouth C€/29177<br />
PO-7"4732<br />
o9t29t77<br />
Various Dealers<br />
Various<br />
Alderson Besearch Lab.<br />
PO-7-3250<br />
Alderson Research Lab.<br />
PO-7-3331<br />
Alderson Research Lab.<br />
PO-7-3?52<br />
Sierra Engineering<br />
PO-8-0007<br />
Alderson Resoarch Lab.<br />
Varlous<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS-S01469<br />
Funds Used<br />
(Thousands<br />
of Dollars)<br />
Stsrt Pre-<br />
Finish FY 76 FY 7B FY 77 FY 78<br />
w20t77<br />
o&t20t77<br />
01117177<br />
01t17t77<br />
0s/24ft7<br />
oa24t77<br />
01'/1477<br />
01112177<br />
11125177<br />
11t25t77<br />
1Qt27t77<br />
10127177<br />
09/30/76<br />
09/30/77<br />
Dynamic Science, Inc. 07113176<br />
DOT-HS-6-01360 01101t77<br />
HSRI, University of Michigan 10/29/76<br />
DOT-Hs-7-0'rs25 11130177<br />
Calspan Corporation OBl2d77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01679 08t2d78<br />
Wright-PattersonAirForce 05/06/76<br />
Base<br />
DOT-HS-S01332<br />
11lOEl77<br />
USAF Aerospace Medical 05/05/76<br />
Research<br />
DOT-HS-6-01331<br />
OElOil77<br />
HSRI, University of Michigan 07129177<br />
DOT-HS-7-01636 07129t78<br />
FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute 04/14/76<br />
DOT-HS-S-01353<br />
12t31177<br />
B&K Instruments<br />
PO-7-3599<br />
Sangamo Electric<br />
PO-7-3585<br />
B & K Instruments<br />
Po-7-3601<br />
07t1w77<br />
07t19t77<br />
QH29t77<br />
Mr29177<br />
07119177<br />
07t19t77<br />
National Bureau of $tandards O7lO1l77<br />
DOT-Hs-7-01709<br />
Variou$<br />
Variou$<br />
09130177<br />
09t3u77<br />
24<br />
68<br />
37<br />
70<br />
10<br />
Program<br />
Code Ttilc<br />
3731C0 Crash Protection Human Factors lnstrumentation<br />
for Human Tolerance<br />
3732AH lnstrumentation of First Thoracic Vertebra<br />
of Cadavers<br />
Table E.l. (Continued)<br />
Conlraclor<br />
C;ontract Numbor<br />
3732AM TaskOrder-MultivariateModelingAdaptronlcs,<br />
Inc. O5l1W77<br />
and Analysis<br />
DOT-HS-F01365 11126177<br />
3732AO Response of Human Surrogates in<br />
$ide lmpact<br />
37328L Head Model and lnfury Crlterla Devel-<br />
0pment<br />
37328N Neck lnlury Assessment Protocol<br />
37328Q Computerization of Head and Neck<br />
Injury Information<br />
g732BR Head Injury Workshop Support<br />
3732DC Injury Study of the Femur-Pelvic Bone<br />
Gomplex in Automobile Crash<br />
Environment<br />
3732E0 Quantification of the Thoraclc<br />
Response and Injury<br />
3732E1 C,omoliance Characteristics of Human<br />
Chest During Cardiopulmonary<br />
Resuscitation<br />
3732EK<br />
3732E1<br />
37334J<br />
Purchase of Accelerometers<br />
Kinematlc and Kinetic Qharacterizatlon<br />
of the Human Neck-ll<br />
3733AN Valldatlon of Crash Vlctlm Simulator<br />
3733AO Kinesiology of the Human Shoulder<br />
and $pine<br />
3733AT Develop Approx, Solutions for CVS<br />
Program and Dummy Design Information<br />
37stilAU<br />
3733AW<br />
Contact-lmpact Problems<br />
Data Processing Services for In-House NHTSA, Off ice of<br />
Usage<br />
Systems<br />
ADP-77-offi<br />
Transportation Systems Center 10/0'l/76<br />
PPA-HS-710 09/30/77<br />
New Mexico State Unlv. 06/30/76<br />
DOT-HS-+01400 06t30177<br />
New Mexico State Unlv. Ogl30l77<br />
DOT.HS-7.01773 09/30/78<br />
Civil Engineering Lab, Naval 04112177<br />
Cost Battalion<br />
DOT-HS-5-01132 |<br />
03/31/78<br />
Los Angeles Co-Forenslc<br />
Science Lab.<br />
DOT-HS-6-01476<br />
Funds Used<br />
(Ihousands<br />
of Dollarc)<br />
Start Pre'<br />
Flnish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY r8<br />
0SEOr/t<br />
03tw77<br />
Naval Civil Engineering Lab. 0912W77<br />
DOT-HS-741732 03t26t77<br />
HSRI, University of Mlchlgan 07108177<br />
PO-7-3583 07tOBt77<br />
Wayne State University 09lWn<br />
DOT-H$7{1785 03/31/80<br />
HSRI, University of Michigan 0efl5|/4<br />
DOT.HS-4-009?1 05/01/7E<br />
Johns Hopkins Univ. School<br />
of Ml19l77<br />
Medicine 04/19/78<br />
DOT-HS-7{1s69<br />
Quantif ication of Occupant Reeponse University of Heidelberg<br />
and Injury from lmpact<br />
(Germany)<br />
DOT-HS-+01063<br />
Endevco, Inc,<br />
PO-7-3684<br />
U.S, Naval Aerospace Medical<br />
Research Lab.<br />
DOT-Hs-7-016471A<br />
Calspan Corporatlon<br />
DOT-HS-01300<br />
Wayne State Univer$ity<br />
DOT-HS-S01232<br />
Calspan Corporation<br />
DOT-HS+01410<br />
University of Cal ifornia,<br />
Berkeley<br />
DOT-HS S014{t<br />
o'Io?t75<br />
03/30/BO<br />
Mt17m<br />
08t17t77<br />
06128ln<br />
ffit2u77<br />
01121176<br />
07t?1t77<br />
06/30/75<br />
ffitw77<br />
08/05/76<br />
oztffit78<br />
07119176<br />
03/31/78<br />
Management 10/01/76<br />
ogt30t77<br />
132<br />
278<br />
389 12<br />
19<br />
200<br />
201<br />
117<br />
35<br />
20<br />
400<br />
179<br />
98<br />
59<br />
25<br />
61<br />
135<br />
39<br />
90<br />
215<br />
56<br />
zffi<br />
68 11
Program<br />
Code Tltle<br />
Table E 1. (Contlnue0<br />
Conlractor<br />
Gontract Numbar<br />
3733M Anatomical Cross-$ectionalGeometryGeorgetown<br />
University Ogl23l77<br />
and Mass Distribution for Children DOT-HS-7-01661 09/23/78<br />
3733AY Data for Validation of Crash Victim<br />
Simulator<br />
37338A Occupant Slde lmpact $lmulation<br />
Uslng GVS Program<br />
3735A1 Pedestrian lmpacts: Baseline and Pr+<br />
llminary Concepts Evaluation<br />
3735AN Rear lmpact Protection Studles<br />
3735AO Response of Human Surrogates in Air<br />
Bag Steering Column SYStems<br />
3737AJ Buy Rate Gyro<br />
Calspan Corporatlon 09130177<br />
DOT-HS-7-01660 09/30/78<br />
Unfverslty of Mlchigan Ogl30l77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01659 Q3/30/79<br />
Battelle Memorial Institute Q2l2Bl77 242<br />
DOT-HS-4-00961<br />
06130177<br />
New Mexico State Unlv. 09/30/77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01772<br />
09/30/78<br />
Wayne State University Qgl30l77<br />
DOT-HS-7-01792 09/30/78<br />
Hamilton $tandard 1407ft6<br />
PO-7-3197<br />
12107176<br />
Funde Used<br />
(Ihoueande sl Dollars)<br />
Start Pre-<br />
Flnfsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 76<br />
68<br />
s0<br />
49<br />
68<br />
36<br />
40<br />
50<br />
90<br />
200<br />
200
LITIGATION: CALENDAR ts77<br />
I. SUPREME COURT<br />
B. F. Goodrich v. DOT. On March 21, lgii, the Supreme<br />
Court denied the request of eight tire rnanufacturers<br />
to review the September Z, 19j6, decision of the<br />
6th Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the principal<br />
provisions of the Uniform Tire euality Grading Standards.<br />
II. COURTOFAPPEALS<br />
PACCAR, Inc. v, NHTSA. (9th Circuit). plaintiffs on<br />
January 3, 1975, filed petitions tbr review of FMVSS<br />
No. l2l, Air Broke Sptems, alleging the Standard to be<br />
invalid, The Court of Appeals heard argumenr on<br />
July 6, 1976, on the matter ancl has not yet rendercd a<br />
decision.<br />
United Slate,r v. Generpl Motors Corporation. (D.C.<br />
Circuit). In June 1977, the Court of Appeals hetd that<br />
thc defective pitman arms in Igjg-l960 Cadiltacs relate<br />
to motor vehicle safety. A lower court held that the risk<br />
presented by these components was not unreasonable.<br />
GM is seeking an appeal in the Supreme Court.<br />
Ceneral Motors Carporation v. Brinegar; Llnited States<br />
v. General Motors Corporation. (Circuit Courr of ,4ppeals<br />
for the District of Columbia). In October 1977, the<br />
Circuit Court upheld the vatidity of a NHTSA order<br />
that Ceneral Motors notify owners of a defect in the fuel<br />
inlet plugs installed in some 2'14,W) 1965-1966 Chevrolets<br />
and Buicks. Plug failurc coulcl result in fire.<br />
Standard Forge and Axle Company v. Coleman. (Circuit<br />
Courl af Appeals for the District of Columbia). petitioners<br />
sought review of FMVSS No. l2l, Air Brake<br />
S},,sl€ras. The Government successfully moved the District<br />
Court to dismiss petitioner's case (order filed September<br />
26, 1975). Petitioner's appeal was rejected.<br />
United States v. Fard Motor Company. (Circuil Caurt<br />
of Appeals for the District of Cotumbia). In August<br />
1975 NHTSA filed an enforssrnsrl action seekine<br />
to<br />
compel Ford to notify owners and remedy defective 1968<br />
and 1969 Mustangs and Cougars. Failure of the front<br />
buckct scats in these vehicles could result in accident,<br />
injury, or death. The District Court granted the Government's<br />
motion for summary judgment on October l,<br />
1976, and is expected to order the company to provide<br />
the remedy and notification sought by the Government.<br />
Ford's appeal is pending.<br />
TEBDA v. NHTSA. (6th Circuit). On February 7, 1917,<br />
the court granted NHTSA's rnotion to dismiss this case<br />
for lack of jurisdiction. TEBDA had sought to sray an<br />
effective date of FMVS$ No. l0l -75, Fue! System Integrity,<br />
and review of NHTSA's denial of an administrative<br />
petition to delay the effcctive date.<br />
III. DISTRICT COURT<br />
United Stafes v. Ford Motor Company. (District Court<br />
for the Distriil of Columbia). On January 7, 1976, thl<br />
Government commenced an entbrcement action against<br />
Ford to compel it to notify approximately 175,000 owners<br />
of I97l-1973 Mercury Capris. The Covernment contends<br />
that thcsc vehicles contain a defect in the windshield<br />
wiper systems which could cause the wipers to fail<br />
during normal operation in adverse weather conditions.<br />
The case is pencling.<br />
Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Coleman;<br />
United States v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company.<br />
(Northern Distritt of Ahio). On Augusr 13, 1975, Firestone<br />
filed under the Freedom of Information Act to<br />
obtain information it allegedly needed in connection<br />
with a pending NHTSA invesrigation. NHTSA resisted<br />
the suit on thc grounds that the information sought is<br />
exempt from disclosurc unclcr the Freedom of Information<br />
Act. The District Court ruled that certain informa_<br />
tion was subject to disclosure. An additional suit filed<br />
by the Covcrnmcnt rcgarditrg alleged noncornpliance of<br />
certain Firestonc tires with FMVSS No. I09, pessen3er<br />
Car Tires, was withdrawn when evidence was cleveloped<br />
indicating insufficiency of the allegations.<br />
Koehring Compony v. Adums. (Eastern Dktrict of ltisconsin).<br />
In this suit, several manufacturers of mobile<br />
cranes and similar mobile construction cquipment seek a<br />
F-3