24.03.2013 Views

lltotor

lltotor

lltotor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Fleport on Activities Under the<br />

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle<br />

Safety Act of 1966 and the<br />

Motor Vehicle Information and Cost<br />

Savings Act of 1972<br />

January 1 ,1977<br />

- December 31 , 1977<br />

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF<br />

TRANSPORTATION<br />

National Highway Traffic<br />

Safety Administration<br />

<strong>lltotor</strong><br />

Vehicle<br />

Safietv<br />

1gT7 -<br />

)<br />

.-I


PREFACE<br />

This is the I lth annual report on the administration of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety<br />

Act of 1966, and is in fulfillment of the reporting requirements in Section 102 of the Act. The annual<br />

report on bumpers, required by Section I12, Title I, of the Motor Vehicle lnformation and Cost Savings<br />

Act of 1972 also is included in this volume. In addition, the statutory obligations contained in<br />

the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1976 with respect to odometer rampering,<br />

and how they are being met, are touched upon in this report.<br />

Part A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 added to the Motor Vehicle Information<br />

and Cost Savings Act a new Title V, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to set, adjust, and<br />

enforce average motor vehicle fuel economy standards. Two annual reports of activities under this<br />

Act have been submitted to the Congress. This text contains a brief outline of the high points of the<br />

most recent of these reports.<br />

In the 7 years following establishment of a national traffic safety program in 1966, the fatality rate<br />

(the number of deaths per 100 million miles driven) declined steadily from 5.48 to 4.11. Then came<br />

the fuel crisis and the permanent imposition of the national 55-mph maximum speed limit in January<br />

1974. The safety eff'ects were dramatic. In 1974, traffic deaths fell by nearly 9,000, from 54,052 to<br />

45,195; and the fatality rate declined from 4.1 I to 3.52. The fbllowing two years brought little change<br />

in the number of deaths on the highway, but there were some further reductions in the fatality rate,<br />

despite a fairly substantial growth in the number of miles driven. The 55-mph speed limit proved its<br />

value as a fuel economy measure and as a lifesaving measure.<br />

Average speeds soon began inching up, however, and some States reduced or eliminated penalties for<br />

infractions of the law. This, coupled with the growth in traffic volume, raised the number of traffic<br />

fatalities 4.7 percent, to 47,671 in 1977. These are not only statistics, but lives; 3,150 more dead<br />

individuals in 1971 than in 1975,<br />

Increased driving speeds are a major contributor to these fatalities, but the growing automobile<br />

population, the greater number of miles driven, the growing disparity in weight among the vehicles<br />

making up the total inventory, and other factors all play a part. There are more bicycies, mororcycles,<br />

and mopeds on the road. The rising tolls add up to an enormous clrain on the national economy;<br />

the annual direct economic cost is currently estimated to be lnore than $43 billion.<br />

It is possible to estimate what might have happened without the positive effects of the motor vehicle<br />

and highway safety standards and the institution of the 55-mph speed limit. If rhe farality rate had<br />

remained constant since I976, the direct economic cost would probably now exceed $76 biltion each<br />

year, and traffic deaths would approximate 77,000 annually. Many research projects have advanced<br />

the state-of-the-art of traffic safety. Safety devices have been incorporated in vehicles and remedial<br />

measures have been applied to the traffic system. In the period since 1967, the total number of lives<br />

saved by the declining latality rate amounts to some 150,000. Motor vehicle safety standards and improved<br />

highway design have contributed greatly to this reduction. About half of the fatality reduction<br />

since 1974 is attributed to lower speeds, resulting from imposition of the 55-mph speed limit.<br />

This is a saving of 20,000 lives in a 4-year period.<br />

1<br />

-:c]<br />

'::i


In spite of those factors that have curbed the highway death toll, traffic fatalities have stubbornly<br />

remained the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. It is a national calamity that the penalties<br />

fall disproportionately on the very young and on those in their most productive years' Traffic<br />

accidents are the number one killer among the 5 to 9-year-olds, and number two among those 9 to 14<br />

years of age. In the 15 to 34-year-old age bracket, highway deaths are the primary killer, accounting<br />

for 38 percent of all deaths among those 15 to 19 years of age, and diminishing to l9 percent of the 30<br />

to 34-year-old category. Other causes, such as heart disease and cancer, push traffic fatalities back to<br />

4th, 6th, and 7th place among those in their late 30's, {6's, and 50's, and to tiny percentages among<br />

the elderly.<br />

The untold human suffering which the traffic death figures represenr, plus the financial burden to<br />

society, make the national traffic safety program worthy of high priority with Federal, State, and<br />

community governments, all branches of the automotive industry, private and public organizations,<br />

and most important of all, with the public.<br />

Specific reporting requirements in the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act are covered in<br />

the Chapters and Appendices listed below:<br />

l. A statistical compilation of the accidents and injuries occurring in the Appendix A<br />

preceding calendar year.<br />

2. A list of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards prescribed or in effect<br />

during the year.<br />

Chapter 2<br />

3. The degree of observance of applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety<br />

Standards.<br />

Chapters 6 and 8<br />

Appendix F<br />

4. A summary of all current research grants and contracts, together with a Chapter I I<br />

description of the problems to be considered by the grantees and contIactors.<br />

Appendix E<br />

5. An analysis and evaluation, including relevant policy recommendations, Chapters l, 4, 5,<br />

of research activities completed and technological progress achieved<br />

during the year.<br />

7 and ll<br />

6. A statement of enforcement actions during the year, including judicial<br />

decisions, settlements, and pending litigation.<br />

Chapters 6 and 8<br />

Appendix F<br />

7. The extent to which technical information was disseminated to the scientific<br />

community and consumer-oriented information was made available<br />

to the motoring public.<br />

Chapters l, 8,<br />

and I I<br />

APpendix D<br />

The statutory reporting requirements with respect to bumpers and odometer tampering are contained<br />

in Chapter 9.<br />

IY<br />

'


CONTENTS<br />

Chapter I Inlroduction<br />

The Record<br />

Motor Vehicle Safety Rulernaking Plan<br />

Priority Programs<br />

Recent Additions to NHTSA Responsibilities . .<br />

Chapter 2<br />

Chapter 3<br />

The Standards Summnry 1977.<br />

Data Acquisition, Analysis, and Reporting<br />

Differential Velocity Crash Recorder<br />

Chapter 4 Crnsh Survivability<br />

Occupant Protection<br />

Vehicle Structures<br />

Pedestrian Protection<br />

Biornechanics<br />

Integrated Vehicle Systems Program<br />

Chrpter 5 Crash Avoldnnce.<br />

Vehicle Handling<br />

Tires and Wheels<br />

Brakes<br />

The Driver and the Vehicle<br />

Chapter 6 Standards Enforcement snd Defects Investigatiorr<br />

Standards Enforcenrent Background. . . . .<br />

The Record<br />

Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />

Surveillance of Imported Nonconforming Motor Vehicles<br />

Defects Investigation Background<br />

How the Job is Done<br />

NHTSA and rhe Recall Campaigns<br />

Safety Defect Recalls-I977 .....<br />

Safety Campaign Audits<br />

Parts Return Program<br />

Recreational Vehicle Surveys<br />

Engi neering Test Facility<br />

Chapter 7 Automotive Fuel Economy<br />

Summary of Functions and Interagency Relations . . . .<br />

Standards Issued and Proposed . . . .<br />

I<br />

I<br />

4<br />

4<br />

6<br />

l3<br />

r4<br />

l5<br />

l5<br />

l6<br />

t'7<br />

r8<br />

l8<br />

25<br />

)\<br />

26<br />

2'7<br />

28<br />

3l<br />

3l<br />

3l<br />

32<br />

33<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

36<br />

37<br />

3'1<br />

38<br />

39<br />

39<br />

39<br />

.H<br />

r,


Regulations and Compliance . .<br />

Fuel Economy Research<br />

Chapter E Litigation and Administrative Enforcement . ' '<br />

Litigation Highlights, I 977<br />

AdministrativeEnforcement . ' '<br />

Chapter I $pecial Programs<br />

International CooPeration . . . .<br />

No-Damage Bumper System<br />

Electric and Hybrid Vehicles Summary<br />

Odometcr Tampering<br />

Chapter l0 The Consumer's Advocate. . . . .<br />

Informing the Press and the Public<br />

ServingtheConsumer . . . .<br />

Chapter 11 Research and How It Is Used.<br />

Analysis, Evaluation, and Dissemination of Research<br />

Current Research Grants and Contracts and the Problems They Address ' ' ' ' . .<br />

Chapter 12 National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory Council '<br />

Reports<br />

Recommendations .<br />

Chapter 13 Administration ...<br />

Organizational Changes<br />

Management Improvements . . .<br />

CivilRights ..;...<br />

GLOSSARY<br />

APPENDICES<br />

A.<br />

B.<br />

E.<br />

F.<br />

vi<br />

Statistical Compilation<br />

The National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory Council<br />

I977 Membership .<br />

Funding Tables<br />

Publications of the National Highway Traffic Safety<br />

Administration . ..<br />

Current Research Grants and Contracts and the Problems<br />

TheyAddress ....<br />

Litigation: Calendar 1977 ..<br />

4A<br />

40<br />

43<br />

43<br />

41<br />

45<br />

45<br />

47<br />

47<br />

47<br />

49<br />

49<br />

49<br />

5l<br />

5l<br />

51<br />

57<br />

57<br />

58<br />

59<br />

59<br />

60<br />

60<br />

A-l<br />

B-l<br />

c-l<br />

D-l<br />

E-1<br />

F-t


TABLES<br />

l. Traffic Fatalities, 196l-1977 viii<br />

2. Analysis of 1976 Traffic Accident Fatalities 3<br />

3. Lives Saved Due to Fatality Rate Reduction . . .<br />

4. National Highway Traf'tic Safety Administration Historical<br />

3<br />

andlegislativeBackground... 6<br />

5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standardsand Regulations ... l0<br />

6. Comparison of Integrated Vehicle System Goals . 19<br />

l. AlternativesAffectingFuelEconomy..... 23<br />

8. Summary of Investigations 1969-19'7'1 . . . . 32<br />

9. Number of Civil Penaltics and Dollar Amounts (1968-1976) 32<br />

10. Summary of Safety Recall Campaigns . 37<br />

I l 1977 Fuel Economy Slandards and Regulations . . 4l<br />

12. 1977 Research Accomplishments and Application<br />

to Motor Vehicle Standards 52<br />

13. Data Acquisition and Statistical Analysis 56<br />

FIGURES<br />

1.55'sthelimit. ,........,i I ,<br />

Z. Air Bag Demonstration . . . 5<br />

3. National Accident Sampling System 14 ::<br />

4. Automatic Safety Belt System 16 i<br />

5. Child and Infant Restraint Systems 16 l<br />

6. Experinental Child Restraint Seat . .<br />

7. Side Impact Testing to Determine a Variety of Deformations . .<br />

l7<br />

l7<br />

I<br />

i<br />

L Adult Male Dummy<br />

9. Experirnental Headlamp Covers to Increase Fuel Economy . . . . .<br />

10. New Minicar RSV Design . . . .<br />

l8<br />

20<br />

20<br />

,<br />

i<br />

j<br />

I l. RSV Phase II Configuration . . 21<br />

12. Section View of VW RSV with Turbocharged Diesel Engine . . . . ZZ<br />

13. VW Turbocharged Diesel Engine Experimental Vehicle 22<br />

14. Portable Wind Generator . .<br />

15. Car-Trailer Combination lllustrating Favorablc Load Equalization<br />

25<br />

26<br />

:<br />

16. Motorcycle Equippcd with Experimental Safety Devices 26<br />

l'7. Ultrasonic Tire Testing System 27<br />

18. Tire Casing Bead Tester 27<br />

19. Testing Saf ety Problems Due to Intermixed Braking Systems 28<br />

20. Testirrg Program to Determine Crash Survivability 32<br />

21. Mopeds*A New Traffic Safety Problem 33<br />

22. NHTSA Deputy Administrator Works His Shift on the Hotline 34<br />

23. Failed Flexible Fan . , . 36<br />

24. Parts Return Program 31<br />

25. Engineering Test Facility 38<br />

26. British Leyland Marina RSV. . 46<br />

27 . Safe Driving in Winter 50<br />

28. Tips on Car Care and Safety for Deaf Drivers-Spanish Version . . . . 50<br />

29. National Highway Traff'ic Safety Administration Organizational Chart 59<br />

$


Table 1"<br />

Traflic Fatalities, 1961-1977<br />

The fatalities and rates for 1976 and 1977 in this Table represent the latest sfaflsflcs available.<br />

1961<br />

Average annual change<br />

Total change<br />

1S66<br />

1966<br />

Average annual change<br />

Total change<br />

1973<br />

1974<br />

Change from 1973<br />

1975<br />

Change from 1974<br />

1976<br />

Change from 1975<br />

1977 (as of 5/1/78)<br />

Change from 1976<br />

Fatalities*<br />

36,285<br />

+7.0%<br />

+ a0.3%<br />

50,894<br />

50,8S4<br />

+ .9o/o<br />

+6.2oh<br />

54,052<br />

45,196<br />

-16.4%<br />

44,525<br />

* 1.5%<br />

45,523<br />

+2.2o/o<br />

47,671<br />

+ 4.7Vo<br />

Fatality<br />

Rate-<br />

*<br />

4.92<br />

+2.2o/o<br />

+ 11.4Vo<br />

5.48<br />

5.48<br />

*4.O%<br />

-25.0%<br />

4.11<br />

3.52<br />

* 14.4ot'o<br />

3.35<br />

- 4.8o/o<br />

3.23<br />

-3.6%<br />

3.25<br />

+0.6%<br />

Drivers<br />

(mil)<br />

88.7<br />

+2.6V0<br />

+ 13.9%<br />

101.0<br />

101.0<br />

+ 2.7o/o<br />

+203%<br />

121.5<br />

125.4<br />

+32%<br />

129.8<br />

+3.5%<br />

134.0<br />

*3.2o/o<br />

137.9<br />

+2.90/o<br />

Vehicles<br />

(mil)<br />

76.6<br />

+ 4.6Yo<br />

+24.9%<br />

95.7<br />

95.7<br />

+ 4.5o/o<br />

+ 35.8%<br />

130.0<br />

134.9<br />

+ 3.8%<br />

137.S<br />

+2.2oh<br />

143"5<br />

+ 4.1o/o<br />

148.9<br />

+ 3.8D/o<br />

Vehicle<br />

Miles (bil)<br />

737.5<br />

+ 4.7Yo<br />

+25.8Yo<br />

927.9<br />

927.9<br />

+5.1%<br />

+ 41.9'h<br />

1,316.7<br />

1,283.3<br />

-2.5Vo<br />

1,330.8<br />

+3.7o/o<br />

1,409.2<br />

+ 5.9%<br />

1,466.0<br />

+ 4.OVo<br />

SOUFCE-Fatalitlesl 1961-1974, National Center for Health Statistics, HEW, and State accident summaries (adjusted to 30day deaths).<br />

1975-1977, Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS), NHTSA .<br />

Drivers, Vehicles, Vehicle Miles-Federal Highway Administration<br />

*Traltic<br />

fatalities are deaths resulting from motor vehlcte accidents occurring on lrafficways. Statisflcs represent dealhs occurrlng withtn<br />

30 days after the date of the accident.<br />

"Traffic<br />

fatallties per 100 million vehicle miles.<br />

NOTE: Deaths occurring withln 30 days of an accident reprssent approximately 980/o of all trafflc death8,<br />

Vehicles in thls table repre$ent all those regist€red at various points in time durlng the calendar y€er and do not represent those in<br />

usa at any one time.


I cnnprEn I<br />

!<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Record<br />

Traffic accidents are the sixth leading cause of<br />

death in the United States. ln 1977, they claimed<br />

47 ,67 | lives. This national tragedy is compounded<br />

by the fact that most of those killed were the young<br />

and those in their most productive years. Traffic<br />

acciclents are the number one cause of death for<br />

children between the ages of 5 and 9, accounting<br />

for 26 percent of all deaths occurring in that age<br />

bracket. They are the number two cause of death<br />

for children in the 10 to 14 bracket, accounting for<br />

23 percent of all deaths. Between l5 and 34, they<br />

are once again number one, claiming an alarming<br />

38 percent of all those who die in the l5 to l9 age<br />

group and gradually decreasing to 14 percent in<br />

the 30 to 34 year old group. Other causes of death,<br />

such as heart disease and cancer, push traffic<br />

fatalitics to 4th, 6th, and 7th place as a cause of<br />

death for those in their late 30's, {1's, and 50's,<br />

and to tiny percentages among the elderly.<br />

In addition to the thousands who are killed each<br />

year on the highways, hundreds of thousands<br />

more are injured, many seriously, and many permanently"<br />

For example, car crashes are the number<br />

one cause of epilepsy and paraplegia in the<br />

United States.<br />

The direct economic cost to society, currently<br />

estimated at $43 billion annually, is enormous.<br />

This level of financial loss is I l/z times greatet than<br />

the yearly expenditure for building, maintaining,<br />

and operating the entire 3.9 million-mile network<br />

of roads in the United States.<br />

While human suffering cannot be measured, this<br />

factor, coupled with the monetary loss, was the<br />

basis and the impetus of the national traffic safety<br />

program launched by Congress with enactment of<br />

traffic sal'ety legislation in 1966. Since that time,<br />

some historic trends have been altered. as both<br />

motor vehicles and highways have been made safer<br />

through the application of safety technology to the<br />

range of problems that cause accidents and intensify<br />

their severity and effects.<br />

Traditionally, an increase in the number of registered<br />

vehicles has resulted in a corresponding<br />

growth in vehicle miles of travel, and in the number<br />

of traffic deaths. This relationship led to the<br />

adoption of vehicle miles of travel as a basis for<br />

assessing accident trends. From 1945 to 1961,<br />

there was a steady 6 percent annual growth in the<br />

level of vehicle travel, but a smaller increase in the<br />

number of fatalities. The result was a decrease in<br />

the fatality rate (the number of deaths per 100 mil-<br />

Iion miles of travel) for the entire period. Conversely,<br />

during the s-year period 196l through<br />

1966, the number of fatalities increased by 40 percent,<br />

while vehicle miles of travel increased only<br />

26 percent. This resulted in an l l percent jump in<br />

the fatality rate (see ll'able l).<br />

From 1966 through 1973, following the establishment<br />

of a national traffic safety program and<br />

prior to the fuel crisis, traffic fatalities increased<br />

only 6 percent (from 50,894 in 1966 to 54,052 in<br />

1973), a remarkably low increase in view of the 40<br />

percent increase in vehicle miles of travel. This<br />

meant a 25 percent reduction in the fatality rate<br />

(from 5.48 to 4.ll).<br />

Following the fuel crisis in 1973, and imposition<br />

of the 55-mph national maximum speed limit in<br />

January 1974 (Figure l), the number of fatalities<br />

for 1974 dropped to 45,196, compared with 54'052<br />

in 1973 (Table l). This represented a saving of<br />

9,000 lives, and was a major trend reversal in light<br />

of a reduction in highway travel of less than 3 percent.<br />

The lower level of deaths continued during<br />

1975 and 1976 (see Tables I and 2). When consideration<br />

is given to the fact that the availability of<br />

fuel permitted travel to increase during these years<br />

I<br />

'1


t#<br />

utMl<br />

Speed lJmit $rugc.esg,<br />

at the rate of approximately 5 percent a year, it is<br />

apparent that the national 55-mph speed limit has<br />

proved its value as a fuel economy measure and as<br />

a life saving measure.<br />

Average speeds soon began inching up, and some<br />

of the States reduced or eliminated penalties for<br />

infractions of the law. Rising speeds, coupled with<br />

the growth in traffic volume, raised the number of<br />

traffic deaths to 47,671 in 1977. These are not just<br />

statistic$, but lives; 3,150 more individuals dead in<br />

1977 than in 1975.<br />

, r ,rrll: tt4<br />

, ,,,r ttmlF<br />

, futi&:<br />

' irilr, riLt4frl<br />

, r,ri 1nry<br />

. , i,rj4 lS<br />

, t, ,, irr,lki<br />

, I r, lrrlrfl<br />

{lrd $ idH4ttd4f ,it l4Mltydp<br />

ri ufidd<br />

' 'l 'rt a i, rwqlgp rryt<br />

3tr, fi #rd4 lfflfi]{t<br />

' r*l ,rt*,n, fo r,{ ftdlcrd Frtrfted<br />

\ \t le ,l'ff| lt sr ld ${dt,l<br />

Figure 1. 55's the Limit<br />

There is a way by which the value of the traffic<br />

safety effort can be roughly measured. If the fatality<br />

rate had remained constant since 1967, the<br />

direct economic cost would probably now exceed<br />

876 billion each year, and traffic deaths would approximate<br />

77,000 annually. Table 3 demonstrates<br />

what might have happened without the positive<br />

effects of the motor vehicle and highway safety<br />

standards and institution of the 55-mph speed<br />

limit.<br />

z<br />

Many research projects have advanced the stateof-the-art<br />

of traffic safety. Safety devices have<br />

been evolved and incorporated in vehicles in the<br />

manufacturing proces$. Remedial measures have<br />

been applied to the traffic system by means of<br />

numerous Federal, State, and community programs.<br />

Among the more important motor vehicle safety<br />

programs are (1) defect investigations and recalls,<br />

(2) research safety vehicles to advance automotive<br />

safety technology, (3) issuance of the final passive<br />

restraint rule for passenger vehicles, (4) research<br />

and plans to upgrade safety standards for light<br />

trucks and vans, (5) the upgrading of school bus<br />

safety standards, and (6) research to determine<br />

ways of eliminating vehicle hazards, such as truck<br />

underride, battery explosions, and electrical system<br />

failure.<br />

Despite solid gains made over the years, there are<br />

persistent problems that prevent more rapid progress.<br />

To date, Federal rulemaking has not brought


light trucks and vans up to the safety level of<br />

passenger cars, although these vehicles are increasingly<br />

used for both passenger travel and utility<br />

Table 2. Analysis of 1976 Traflic Accident<br />

Fatalities*<br />

1976 Deaths<br />

Motor Vehicle Occupant Fatalities 33,790<br />

Passenger Car 26,645<br />

Truck<br />

6,130<br />

Bus<br />

Oth€r<br />

73<br />

s42<br />

Other Traffic Fatalltles<br />

Pedestrians<br />

Motorcyclists<br />

Pedalcyclists<br />

Other<br />

Total: 1976 Traffic Accident<br />

Fatalities<br />

7,427<br />

3,312<br />

914<br />

80<br />

Source: Fatal Accident Reporting System (FAFS)<br />

NHTSA Traff ic Fatalities (30.day def inition)<br />

11,733<br />

45,523<br />

NOTE: 30day deaths represent approximalely 98% of all traflic<br />

deaths.<br />

'1976 is th6 lat€st year for whlch flnal statistica are avallable,<br />

Year<br />

1967<br />

1968<br />

1969<br />

1970<br />

1971<br />

1972<br />

1973<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

1967<br />

Rate<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

5.25<br />

purposes. The continuing controversy over antilock<br />

brake requirements for large vehicles is limiting<br />

the ultimate safety gains expected from<br />

FMVSS No. l2l.<br />

Seat belt usage, or non-usage, continues to be a<br />

matter of serious concern, as this device protects<br />

the belted+ccupant in a variety of crash situations.<br />

One survey in 16 U.S. cities found that only 18.5<br />

percent of drivers use their belts. At a 70 percent<br />

usage rate, it is estimated that approximately<br />

11,500 lives would be saved annually.<br />

The basic concerns of the National Highway Traffic<br />

Safety Administration (NHTSA) are motor<br />

vehicle and highway safety. To this has been added<br />

the function of issuing and enforcing vehicle fuel<br />

economy standards and the research upon which<br />

to base such standards in the future. These standards<br />

must be established without doing violence to<br />

safety, environmental, and economic considerations.<br />

Emphasis is placed on solutions to problems likely<br />

to produce the most effective results at the lowest<br />

possible cost. The establishment of a rational plan<br />

leading to selection of priorities is essential to this<br />

approach.<br />

Table 3. Llves Saved Due to Fetellty Rets Reductlon<br />

(Irafflc Fatalities-30 Day Deflnition)<br />

Fatalities<br />

(Based on Actual<br />

1967 Rate) Rate<br />

50,724<br />

53,535<br />

55,973<br />

58,487<br />

62,142<br />

66,419<br />

69,'128<br />

67,376<br />

69,865<br />

73,979<br />

76,940<br />

5.25<br />

5.17<br />

5.02<br />

4.72<br />

4.M<br />

4.32<br />

4.11<br />

3.52<br />

3.35<br />

3.23<br />

3.25<br />

Lives Saved<br />

Due to Lives $aved<br />

Actual SSMPH Due to $afety<br />

Deaths Speed Limit Programs<br />

50,724<br />

52,725<br />

53,543<br />

52,627<br />

52,542<br />

54,589<br />

54,052<br />

45,196<br />

44,525<br />

45,50S<br />

47,671<br />

5,070<br />

5,100<br />

4,500<br />

1,600<br />

B;<br />

2,430<br />

5,860<br />

9,600<br />

11,830<br />

15,080<br />

1 7,1 10<br />

20,240<br />

23,970<br />

27,700<br />

Total<br />

Lives<br />

Saved<br />

810<br />

2,430<br />

5,860<br />

9,600<br />

11,830<br />

15,080<br />

22,180<br />

25,340<br />

28,470<br />

29,300<br />

16,270 134,630 150,900<br />

NOTE: 1977 f igures are eslirnated. Statisticel studies incllcale that, while the fatality level remains substantlally lower than the 1973 lev€|,<br />

a growing portion of the saving ls attributable to th6 combinod effect ot all safety standards and programs which meke up thg<br />

national traflic aatetv 6ffort.<br />

q<br />

I<br />

r<br />

I<br />

r l<br />

i


Motor Yehicle Snfety Rulemaking Plan<br />

During 1977, NHTSA drafted a Motor Vehicle<br />

Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking Plan to be<br />

published early in 1978, after review by the Secretary<br />

of Transportation.<br />

With the Secretary's 1977 decision on passive restraints<br />

(discussed in Chapter 4), the most serious<br />

hazard confronting the motoring public (the dangers<br />

associated with frontal crashes only) will be<br />

reduced significantly. When all passenger cars<br />

have been equipped with passive restraints, a<br />

reduction in motor vehicle fatalities approaching<br />

9,0(X) lives per year is anticipated.<br />

The challenge now facing NHTSA is to identify<br />

other areas where the promulgation of safety<br />

standards would significantly enhance the safety<br />

of the public. The existence of a serious problem,<br />

in and of itself, is not a sufficient basis for scheduling<br />

rulemaking. There also must be a reasonable<br />

chance of developing a solution to that problem.<br />

Where problems are recognized and solutions are<br />

not readily apparent, research is required.<br />

In the near-term, there are a number of aspects on<br />

which the agency has been working for several<br />

years, and where feasible solutions are readily<br />

available. Generally, motor vehicle rulemaking<br />

priorities will be in the areas of Occupant Crash<br />

Protection, Light Trucks and Vans, Pedestrian<br />

Safety, and Braking Sysfens.<br />

Having promulgated the passive restraint rule, to<br />

mitigate dangers of frontal crashes, NHTSA will<br />

now emphasize the improvement, of carstocounter<br />

the next most serious cause of injury, side crashes.<br />

Last year, side crashes accounted for more than<br />

I,100 fatalities.<br />

NHTSA proposes to extend passenger car standards<br />

to light trucks and vans. In 1976, almost<br />

5,000 occupants of light trucks and vans suffered<br />

fatal injuries.<br />

In the pedestrian safety area, attention will focus<br />

on accelerated research programs. Rulemaking in<br />

the next 3 or 4 years is expected to have only a<br />

minor impact on fatality levels. Solutions other<br />

than rulemaking, such as highway design and citizen<br />

education, will have a payoff. However, the<br />

unconscionably high level of pedestrian fatalities<br />

(7,400 during 1976) makes full exploration of all<br />

means of increasing pedestrian protection through<br />

vehicle modifications a matter of urgency.<br />

4<br />

NHTSA expects to substantially improve braking<br />

performance of all classes of vehicles. lmprovement<br />

in vehicle braking will lead to commensurate<br />

reduction in both the number and severity of<br />

crashes.<br />

In the process of drawing up the plan, NHTSA<br />

reviewed all pending actions, particularly those<br />

with low priority. As a result, some lg open rulemaking<br />

actions are to be terminated.<br />

Motor vehicle fuel economy rulemaking will continue<br />

along the same lines as in 1977 (see Chapter<br />

7). NHTSA will establish average fuel economy<br />

standards for vans and light trucks under 10,000<br />

pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). Additionally,<br />

emphasis will be on research and development,<br />

coupled with standards reappraisal as additional<br />

data become available.<br />

Priority Progrnms<br />

NHTSA priority programs in 19'77 included (l)<br />

fuel economy, (2) data acquisition, analysis, and<br />

reporting, (3) occupant safety, and (4) defects investigations<br />

and standards enforcement.<br />

Four other 1977 priority programs (reappraisal of<br />

highway safety standards, enforcement of the<br />

55-mph speed limit, alcohol and highway safety,<br />

and pedestrian safety) are discussed in a companion<br />

report "Highway Safety, a Report by the<br />

President on the Administration of the Highway<br />

Safety Act of 1966, as amended."<br />

Fuel Economy<br />

When it passed the Energy Policy and Conservation<br />

Act of 1975, the Congress recognized the<br />

crucial economic and strategic importance to this<br />

country of reducing national dependence on imported<br />

petroleum and conserving our finite fossil<br />

fuel resources. This Act amended the Motor Vehicle<br />

and Cost Savings Act of 1972 to include Title<br />

V, which charges the Secretary of Transportation<br />

with the issuance of standards to improve the fuel<br />

economy of motor vehicles. Authority to administer<br />

the fuel economy program was delegated to the<br />

Administrator of NHTSA.* There have been two<br />

rAIl actions are subject to review by the Sccrctary, the Dcpartnrent<br />

of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency and,<br />

on a case by case basis, the Department of Commerce, the<br />

Council on Wage and Price Stability, the Council on Environmental<br />

Quality, and the Economic Policy Board,


annual reports to the Congress, for 1976 and<br />

1977*, which describe the work done to date; the<br />

standards issued and proposed; the regulations<br />

governing procedures, definitions, and reports;<br />

the comprehensive research program undertaken;<br />

and the effects of the standards on fuel savings<br />

and consumer costs. (See Chapter 7 for the standards<br />

and regulations issued, and the plans and<br />

research undertaken by the NHTSA fuel economy<br />

program).<br />

A NHTSA study, "The Effect of the Fuel Shortage<br />

on Travel and Highway Safety", summarizes<br />

tests on fuel consumption. It estimates that, if the<br />

55-mph speed limit were strictly observed, total<br />

motor fuel consumption could be reduced by as<br />

much as 4 percent (about ?00,000 barrels of gasoline<br />

a day), a savings sufficient to justify the speed<br />

limit solely as an energy conservation measure.<br />

A Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)<br />

study estimated that reduced speeds saved between<br />

.8 and 2.9 percent of total 1975 highway fuel consumption.<br />

Other estimates suggest a reduction of<br />

about I.4 percent in gasoline consumption.<br />

While energy conservation motivated the law,<br />

another benefit became of major importance-a<br />

reduction in traffic fatalities of 9,000 a year, of<br />

which at least half may be attributed to the 55-mph<br />

speed limit. Even though average speeds have increased<br />

sliehtly in 1976 and 1977, the lifesaving<br />

benefit continues.<br />

I)ata Acquisition, Analysls, and Reporting<br />

Progress in traffic safety is dependent upon the<br />

breadth and validity of the data upon which it is<br />

based. A strong analytical foundation is required<br />

to reveal trends, uncover problems, establish<br />

priorities, allocate resources, appraise current and<br />

prospective standards, and formulate better safety<br />

standards.<br />

The National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />

(NCSA) was established in 1976, incorporating<br />

NHTSA's existing $tatistical unit. Through a graduated<br />

national program of field studies and pilot<br />

tests, NCSA is expanding its ability to collect<br />

timely and reliable accident data on drivers, pedestrians,<br />

vehicles, collision types, injuries, environmental<br />

factors, and exposure. When the statistical<br />

center's programs are fully operational, NHTSA<br />

*Available from<br />

NHTSA.<br />

Ceneral Services Division/Distribution,<br />

will be treating the statistics of highway safety<br />

problems as a whole rather than in fragmented<br />

parts. (See Chapter 3 for details of the statistical<br />

reporting and analysis system).<br />

Occuprnt Safety-Passive Restmints<br />

There are presently two basic approaches to saving<br />

more lives and avoiding serious injuries through<br />

occupant restraint systems. The first is legalistic.<br />

More than 20 nations and twoprovinces of Canada<br />

have enacted mandatory seat belt use laws to increase<br />

usage, and thereby the effectiveness, of<br />

existing seat-belt systems. The other way is to install<br />

automatic passive restraint systems in passenger<br />

cars in place of, or in conjunction with, active<br />

belt systems. These systems are passive in the sense<br />

that no action by the occupant is required to benefit<br />

from the restraint protection. The two forms of<br />

passive restraints that have been commercially<br />

produced are inflatable occupant restraints (commonly<br />

known as air bags) (Figure 2) and passive<br />

belts.<br />

The Secretary of Transportation announced in<br />

June 1977 that FMVSS No. 208 for occupant<br />

Figure 2. Air Bag Demonstration<br />

I ll


crash protection in new passenger cars was being<br />

amended to require the provision of front-seat<br />

"passive"<br />

restraint protection in passenger cars<br />

on a graduated basis, beginning with the largest<br />

cars in September 1981, and including all passenger<br />

cars manufactured on or after September l,<br />

1983. (For additional information on Standard<br />

No. 208, see Chapter 4).<br />

Defects Investigations and Standsrds Enforcement<br />

In addition to enforcing compliance with the established<br />

motor vehicle safety standards, NHTSA<br />

investigates possible safety defects of vehicles and<br />

equipment not covered by safety standards, and<br />

requires the manufacturers to recall such vehicles<br />

or equipment and remedy the safety defects. There<br />

were more vehicles recalled in the United States<br />

for correction of safety defects in1977 than in any<br />

other year in history-26 safety defect recall campaigns<br />

involving 12.9M vehicles. Theroleof standards<br />

enforcement is to test vehicles and equipment<br />

to make certain they comply with the standards<br />

Table 4. National Highway Ttafflc Safety Administration Historicaf and Legistative Background<br />

Year<br />

1924 to<br />

1966<br />

1924<br />

1937<br />

1946<br />

1954<br />

1956<br />

1958<br />

and, if they do not, requiie the manufact*rers to<br />

issue recalls and remedy any defects. During the<br />

past year, 303 compliance investigations were<br />

initiated and 28t investigations were closed. Additional<br />

duties include enforcement of fuel economy<br />

standards and consumer protection regulations.t<br />

(For further information, see Chapter 6.)<br />

Recent Addltlons to ffHfSn Responslblllties<br />

In August 1977, the President approved the Department<br />

of Energy Organization Act (p.L. gj-gt),<br />

which amended Section 502 of the Motor Vehicle<br />

Information and Cost Saving Act. This amendment<br />

requires the Secretary of Transportation to<br />

consult and coordinate with the Secretary of<br />

Energy on the establishment, reduction, or amendment<br />

of the average fuel economy standards for<br />

motor vehicles.<br />

Table 4 provides the historical and legislative<br />

background<br />

for NHTSA and its predecessors.<br />

Traffic<br />

Fatalities* i , i: i Publiclaw<br />

18,400<br />

50,894<br />

Federal Government organizations concerned with highway safety:<br />

Department of Health, Education, and Welfare<br />

Department of Commerce<br />

Post Off ice Department<br />

Department of Defense<br />

General Services Administration<br />

Interstate Commerce Commission<br />

i. r' r. , i ,<br />

Interdepartmental Hlghway safety Board<br />

President's Committee for Highway Safety<br />

18,400<br />

37,819<br />

31,874<br />

33,990<br />

37,965<br />

35,331<br />

National Conference on Street and Highway Safety (convened by<br />

Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover).<br />

:, ::i r,i<br />

Second National Conference on Street and Highway Safety.<br />

Report: Guides to Traffic Satety.<br />

Third National Conference produced an Action Program tor Highway<br />

Safety.<br />

The President's Committee for Traffic Safety established and<br />

adopted the Action Program.<br />

First Congressional interest; Subcommittee Health and Safety of<br />

the House Committee on lnterstate Commerce.<br />

Secretary of Commerce authorized to assist in carrying out the pres. ,<br />

ident's Action Program and to cooperate with the States in furthering<br />

highway safety.<br />

Interstate compacts for Traffic safety (Beamer Resolution).<br />

p.L. g5.6g4


Table { Natlonal Hlghway Tralflc Srfety Admlnlstrrtlon Hlstodcal and Leglslatlve Backgrcund<br />

(Contlnuefl<br />

Trafflc<br />

YEar FatalitiEs' Public Law<br />

1959 #,223<br />

1960 36,399<br />

1961 36.285<br />

1962<br />

1965<br />

1966<br />

1972<br />

1973<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

38,980<br />

47,089<br />

50,894<br />

1967 ffi,724<br />

1968 62,725<br />

1970<br />

52.627<br />

54,589<br />

54,05?<br />

45,196<br />

44,525<br />

Report by the secretary of commsrce to congress on magnltude of<br />

traffic safety problems, and the role the_Fedaral Governmsnt $hould<br />

play in attacking them.<br />

Flequirements for Passenger-Carrying Motor VehiclEs Purchased for<br />

Use by the Federal Government to M€et Certain Saf€ty Standards.<br />

Prohibition of UsE in Commerce of any Motor Vehicle Which Discharges<br />

Substances in Amounts Found by the Surgeon General to<br />

be Injurious to Human Health.<br />

Registratlon of AutomobilE License Revocations (Natlonal Driver<br />

Register).<br />

Amendmants<br />

Amendmants<br />

Flequirements for Passsnger-Carrylng Motor vehiclss for Use by the<br />

Federal Government to Ms€t Certain Safety $tandards.<br />

Hydraulic Brake Fluld Specifications.<br />

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle $afety Act of 1966. Established P.L.89-563<br />

the National Traffic Safety Agency in the Department of Commerce.<br />

Highway Safety Act of 1966. Established the National Highway P.L.89.564<br />

$afety Agency in the Depertment of Commerce.<br />

Department of Transportation Act of 1966.<br />

P.1.8+670<br />

Executive Order 11357 combined the two agencies in the Department<br />

of Transportation as the National Hlghway Safety Bureau.<br />

National Trafflc and Motor Vehlcle Safety Act of 1966, amendments. P.L. 91.265<br />

Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970.<br />

P.L.91,605<br />

Report of the Presldsnt's Task Force on Highway Safety: Mobility<br />

Without Mayhem.<br />

Motor Vehicle Informatlon and Cost Savings Act.<br />

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle $afety Act Amendments of 1972.<br />

Federal-Aid Hlghway Act of 1973.<br />

Motor Vehicle and Schoolbus Safgty Amendments of 1974'<br />

Federal-Aid Highway Amendments of 1974.<br />

Energy Pollcy and Conssrvation Act e$tablished the Automotlve Fuel<br />

Economy Program by adding a new Title V to the Motor Vehicle Infor'<br />

mation and Cost Savings Act.<br />

P.L. 85-515<br />

P.L.86493<br />

P"L.86460<br />

P.1.87-359<br />

P.L.89-563<br />

P.1.88-515<br />

P.L. 87-637<br />

$tandards tor Automoblle SEat Belts Sold or $hipped In Interstatg P.1.88-201<br />

Commerce.<br />

Amendment to the Federal-Aicj Highway Act providing for Voluntary P.1.89-139<br />

$tate Highway Safety Standards (Baldwin Amendment).<br />

Repoft of the Secretary's Advisory Commlttee on Traflic Safety<br />

(Department of Health, Education, and Welfare).<br />

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, amendments F.L.9G285<br />

t6rminated tgmporary exemption authority by statute three years<br />

after enactment,<br />

P.L. 92-513<br />

P.L. 92-548<br />

P.L. 93-87<br />

P.L. S3-492<br />

P.1.93.&t3<br />

P.L. S4.163<br />

{<br />

!l r<br />

"rj<br />

i


Table 4. Natlonal Highway Tralflc Safety Adminlstratlon Hlstorlcal and Leglslatlve Background<br />

(Gontinued)<br />

Trafflc<br />

Year Fatalities* Public Law<br />

1976 45,523 Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1976.<br />

National Traffic and Motor Vehiclesafety<br />

Act<br />

Authorization.<br />

Motor Vehicle Information and CostSavings<br />

Act<br />

1976.<br />

P.1.94_280<br />

Amendment<br />

and P.L.94-346<br />

Amendments<br />

of P.L.94-364<br />

SOURCE*Fatalities: 1924-.1974, Natlonal Center for Heelth Statlstlcs, HEW, and Stat€ annual summaries (adjusted to 30-dey<br />

deaths,.<br />

1S75-1976, Fatal Accident Heporting System (FAHS), NHTSA,<br />

*Traffic fatalitles are deaths resultlng trom motor vehicle eccidents occurring on trafficways. Statistics r6pr6s€nt d6eths occurring within<br />

30 days after the date of the accldent, whlch conslitutB approximately 98% of all traffic deaths.


THE STANDARDS SUMMARY 1977<br />

A chronological table at the end of this summary<br />

lists Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />

(FMVSS) and Regulations issued since January<br />

1967, with initial effective dates.<br />

The following regulation wus issued and became<br />

effective during this reporting period:<br />

Part 556-Exemption for Inconsequential Defect<br />

or Noncompliance<br />

This regulation sets forth procedures for exempting<br />

manufacturers of motor vehicles and replacement<br />

equipment from notice and remedy requirements<br />

when a defect or noncompliance is found to<br />

be inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle<br />

safety. (Effective March 9, 1977).<br />

The following significant amendments were issued<br />

and became effective during this reporting period:<br />

Standard No. 109*New Pneumatic Tires<br />

The amendment permits manufacture of a new<br />

series of tires having load ratings and inflation<br />

pressures expressed only in metric units, in order<br />

to conform with a world-wide standardization<br />

process. The amendment also allows substitution<br />

of newly designed tires with maximum inf'lation<br />

pressure of 60 psi for conventional spare tires.<br />

This substitution reduces the overall weight and<br />

increases the storage space of passenger cars. (Effective<br />

March 7, 1977).<br />

Standard No. 120-7r7e Selection and Rims for<br />

Motor Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars<br />

This standard requires that the wheels of all vehicles,<br />

except passenger cars, be equipped with tires<br />

and rims that are adequate to support the fullyloaded<br />

vehicles under normal operating condition$.<br />

As of February 7, 1977, the amendment<br />

affects tire and rim selection, rim marking, and<br />

tire label information. This amendment also sets<br />

forth the Department of Transportation (DOT)<br />

decision that it no longer regulates mobile structure<br />

trailers (mobile homes). Conforming amendments<br />

to Standard No. 108, Lamps, Reflective<br />

Devices, and Associated Equipment and to Part<br />

571, Definitions, also were made by this issuance.<br />

Standard No. l2l-,4ir Brake Ststems<br />

Effective June 13, 1977, suspension of the bus<br />

service brake stopping distance requirements contained<br />

in Standard No. l2l was extended to January<br />

l, l9?8, and an additional extension to April<br />

l, 1978, was granted for school buses.<br />

Another amendment added certain vehicles to the<br />

"oversize"<br />

vehicle category and excluded specialized<br />

vehicles from applicability of the standard's<br />

requirements. (Effective August 16, 1977).<br />

Standard No. 205-Glazing Materials<br />

The glazing materials standard was amended to<br />

permit the use of rigid plastic glazing materials in<br />

all bus doors and windows, except the windshields<br />

and those windows located immediately to the left<br />

or right of the driver. (Effective December 22,<br />

re77).<br />

Standard No. 222-^Scltool Bus Passenger Seating<br />

und Crash Protection (Interim Amendment)<br />

Maximum allowable seat spacing for school buses<br />

was increased from 20 to 21 inches, effective<br />

December 22, 1977. This spacing will make more<br />

room for large high school students while still permitting<br />

a safe level of seat performance. The<br />

amendment is interim, and the public, by means<br />

of a separate NPRM, has been provided opportunity<br />

to comment upon the advisability of extending<br />

the maximum seat spacing by one inch.<br />

Part 567-Cer t ifica t ion Re gu la t ion<br />

This change was for the purpose of allowing gross<br />

axle weight ratings to be combined on the certification<br />

label. (Effective June 13, 19'77),<br />

g


Palt 57l-Anthropomorphic Test Dummy<br />

This part describes the anthropomorphic test dummies<br />

that are to be used for testing motor vehicle<br />

compliance with FMVSS. Several elements of the<br />

dummy calibration test procedures were specified,<br />

and minor changes were effected for the dummy<br />

design specifications.<br />

The following amendments were acted upon during<br />

1977, hut did not become effective during the<br />

reporting period:<br />

Part 581-,Bumper Standard<br />

The new bumper standard limits damage to nonsafety-related<br />

components and vehicle surfaces in<br />

low-speed crashes, and incorporates the safetyrelated<br />

damage criteria of FMVSS No. 215, .Exferior<br />

Protection. One amendment sets the effective<br />

date for September l, 1978, and requires no damage<br />

to exterior surfaces or permanent deviations<br />

from original contours, except where such damage<br />

occurs to the bumper face bar and components<br />

that directly attach the bumper fhce bar to the<br />

chassis frame. For vehicles manufactured on or<br />

after September 1, 1979, the exterior surfaces,<br />

except for the bumper face bar, shall have no separations<br />

and no permanent deviations from their<br />

original contour.<br />

Standard No. 208-Occupdnt Crflsh Protection<br />

The existing motor vehicle safety standard for<br />

occupant crash protection was amended, to require<br />

the provision of front seat ''passive" restraintprotection<br />

in passenger cars with wheelbases greater<br />

than 114 inches manufactured on and after September<br />

l, 1981, in passenger cars with wheelbases<br />

greater than 100 inches on or after September l,<br />

1982, and in all passenger car$ manufactured on<br />

or after September l, 1983.<br />

Standard No. Z|Z-Windshield Mounting<br />

The effective date of a 1976 amendment to the<br />

standard was extended from September l,1977 to<br />

September l, 1978, for trucks and multipurpose<br />

vehicles of 10,000 pounds or less, and for vans.<br />

"Walk-in<br />

van-type" vehicles were excluded from<br />

the standard's applicability.<br />

Table 5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Salety Standards and Regulations<br />

Date lssued lnltlal Effectlve Dateg<br />

January 31, 1967 Standard No. 101 Control Location, ldentification, and<br />

lllumination<br />

Standard No. 102<br />

Standard No. 103<br />

Standard No. 104<br />

Standard No. 105<br />

Standard No. 106<br />

Standard No. 107<br />

Standard No. 108<br />

Standard No. 111<br />

$tandard No.201<br />

$tandard No.203<br />

Standard No.204<br />

$tandard No.205<br />

Standard No. 206<br />

Transmlssion Shift Lever Sequence,<br />

Starter Interlock, Transmission<br />

Braking Effect<br />

Windshield Defrostlng and Defogging<br />

Windshield Wiping and Washing<br />

Systems<br />

Hyclraulic Brake Systems<br />

Brake Hoses<br />

Reflecting Surfaces (Chrome Trim)<br />

Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated<br />

Equipment<br />

Rearview Mirrors<br />

Qccupant Protection in Interior lmpact<br />

lmpact Protection for the Driver from the<br />

Steering Control System<br />

$teering Control Rearward Displacement<br />

Glazing Materials<br />

Door Locks and Door Retention<br />

Qomponents<br />

PC-1/1i68; MPV, TL,<br />

B-1/1/72; TR,<br />

B^il1173<br />

PC, MPV, TH, B_1/1/68<br />

PC, MFV-1/1/68<br />

TR, 8-1/1/69<br />

PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />

B-1/1/69<br />

PG-1/1/68; MPV, TB,<br />

B*gt1t74<br />

PC, MPV-1/1/68;TR, B,<br />

TL, MC, E-911174<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B_1/1/68<br />

PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR, B,<br />

TL, MC, E*1/1/69<br />

PC, MPV-1/1/68; TR, B,<br />

MC, E-zt1t76<br />

PC-1/1/68<br />

PC-1/1/68<br />

PC-1/1/68<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B,<br />

MQ-1/1/68<br />

PC-1/1/68<br />

MPv*1/1/70<br />

rH-111172


Table 5. Chronology of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and Regulations (Continued)<br />

Date l8sued lnitial Effective Dates<br />

Standard No.207 Seating Systems<br />

PC-1/1/68, MPV, TR,<br />

rqi r i'<br />

Standard No.2081 Occuoant Crash Protection<br />

B-111172<br />

*PC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />

B-7t1t71<br />

Standard No.209 $eat Belt Assemblies<br />

PC, MPV, TR, 8-3/1/67<br />

.i ,, Standard No. 210 Seat Belt Assemhly Anchorages<br />

PC-1/1/68; MPV, TH,<br />

B-7t1t71<br />

Standard No. 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs, and Hub Caps FC, MPV-1/1/68<br />

Standard No.301 Fuel System Integrity<br />

FC-1/1/68; MPV, TR,<br />

B-911175<br />

November 8, 1967 Standard No. 109 New Pneumatic Tires<br />

PC-1/1/68<br />

Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims<br />

PC-4/1/68<br />

January 2, 1968 Part 12 Customs Hegulation<br />

PC, MPV, TFt, B, TL, MC<br />

January 3, 1968 Part 568 Vehicles Manufactured In Two or More 1rrlff'U8<br />

Stages<br />

February 1?, 196E Standard No.202 Head Restraints<br />

April 24, 1968 Standard No. 112 Headlamo Concealment Devices<br />

$tandard No. 113 Hood Latch Sy$tems<br />

Standard No. 114 Theft Frolection<br />

July 3, 1968 Standard No. 115 Vehicle ldentification Numbers<br />

August 13, 1968 Standard No. 212 Windshield Mounting<br />

December 24, 1968 Standard No. 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids<br />

January 17, 1969 Part No. 5'67 Certlficatlon Hegulation<br />

Part No.569 Regrooved Tires<br />

PC-1i 1/69<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, MC<br />

1/1/69<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B*1/1/69<br />

PA-1t1t70<br />

PC-1/1/69<br />

PC*1l1l7Q; MPV, TB,<br />

B-9t1t77<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />

MC-1/4/69<br />

PC, MFV, TR, B, TL, MC<br />

8/31/69<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MO,<br />

E-Z2Bi69<br />

March 23, 1970 Standard No. 213 Child Seating Systems<br />

PC, MPV, E-11117'l<br />

TR, B-4/1/71<br />

Juty 17, 1970 Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window SyBtemB<br />

PC, MPV-1/1/71<br />

October 22,1970 Standard No.214 Side Door Strength<br />

PC-1t1t73<br />

PC, MPV, TR, 8-9/1/72<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />

E-8116t71<br />

TR, B, TL-1/1/73<br />

PA-gt1t72<br />

PQ, E-111172<br />

PC-8/15/73<br />

MC-9/1/73<br />

E-1t1t74<br />

PC, MPV, TR, 8-9/1/73<br />

MQ-gt1174<br />

TR, E-1/1/73<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />

July 26, '1973<br />

Part No.575 Consumer Information (Tire Reserve<br />

Load, Acceleration & Passing Ability,<br />

PC, MC-9/30/69<br />

Vehicle Stopping Distance)<br />

November 5, 1970 Part No. 574 Tire ldentification and Record Keeping E-511171<br />

December 31, 1970 $tandard No.302 Flammability of Interior Materials<br />

February 10, 1371 Part 573 Defect Reports<br />

February 19, 1971 Standard No. 121 Alr Brake Sy$tems<br />

April 9, 1971<br />

April 14, 1971<br />

Standard No. 215<br />

Standard No. 117<br />

Exterior Protection (Bumpers)<br />

Retreaded Pneumatic<br />

:<br />

Tires<br />

December 3, 1971 Standard No.216 Roof Crush Resistance<br />

March 1, 1972 Standard No. 122 Motorcycle Brake Systems<br />

Standard No. 125 Warning Devices<br />

March 31, 1972 Standard No. 124 Accelerator Control System$<br />

April 4, 1972 $tandard No. 123 Motorcycle Controls and Di$plays<br />

May 3, 1972 Standard No. 217 Bus Window Retention and Release B-911173<br />

August 3,1972 Standard No. 126 Truck-Camper Loading<br />

January 17,1573 Part No. 577 Defect Notitications<br />

E-st2H73<br />

January 22, 1973 Part No. 555 Temporary Exemptions from Federal<br />

Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />

1129173<br />

January 31, 1973 Part No. 580 Odometer Disclosure Requirements rc, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />

Part No. 572 Anthropomorphic Test Dummy<br />

MC*3/1/73<br />

E-W1t73<br />

August 9, 1973 Standard No.218 Motorcycle Helmets<br />

l,n0-3fi174<br />

11<br />

.,


Table 5. Chronology oi Federal Motor Vehlcle Salety Standards and Regulatlons (Contlnued)<br />

Date lssued Initial Effective Dates<br />

November 5, 1973<br />

April 22,1974<br />

August 13, 1S74<br />

January 31, 1975<br />

May 20, 1975<br />

June 9, 1975<br />

September 4, 1975<br />

January 19, 1S76<br />

January 22, 1976<br />

February 27,1976<br />

January 31, 1977<br />

Standard No. '119<br />

Part 553<br />

Part 576<br />

Part 582<br />

Part No,575<br />

Standard No. 219<br />

Part No.552<br />

Standard No. 120<br />

Standard No.220<br />

Standard No. 221<br />

Standard No. 222<br />

Part 581<br />

Part 556<br />

LEGEND: PC-PassengerCars<br />

MPV-Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles<br />

. tF(-trucKs<br />

B-Buses<br />

SB*School Buses<br />

TL-Trailers<br />

MC-Molorcycles<br />

E-Equipment<br />

*Formerly entitled "Seat Belt Installation"<br />

New Pneumatic Tires<br />

Procedures<br />

Records Fletention (lnterim Rule)<br />

Insurance Cost Information Regulatlon<br />

Consumer Inf ormation-Uniform Ti re<br />

Quality Grading<br />

Windshield Zone Intrusion<br />

Petitions for Rulemaking, Dofect and<br />

Noncompliance Orders<br />

Tire Selection and Rims for Vehlcles<br />

Other Than Passenger Cars<br />

School Bus Rollover Protectlon<br />

School Bus Body Joint Strength<br />

School Bus Seating and Crash<br />

Protection<br />

Bumper Standard<br />

Exemption for Inconsequential Defecl or<br />

Noncompliance<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL, MC,<br />

E-St1t74<br />

4t25t74<br />

PC, MPV, TR, B, TL,<br />

E-U1il77<br />

211t75<br />

PC, E-9/1/74<br />

PC, MPV, TR, 8_9/1/76<br />

1Qt13t75<br />

MPV, TR, B, TL, MC, E<br />

Bt1l76<br />

B-10t28t76<br />

B-10/26/76<br />

B-10/26/76<br />

PC-9/1/78<br />

PC, MPV, TH, B, TL, MC<br />

3/9t77<br />

tlmportant<br />

amendments to Standard No. 208 Include the requirements for shoulder harnesses (1/1/72), reminder buzzer and light (2/25/75),<br />

and passive restraints (by vehicle wheelbase; 9/1/81-9/1/83).


CHAPTER 3<br />

DATA AGQUISITION, ANALYSIS, AND<br />

REPORTING<br />

Evaluation of existing and proposed standards,<br />

identification of problems, formulation of better<br />

safety systems, and development of improved<br />

standards and countermeasures require a strong<br />

statistical and analytical foundation. A comprehensive,<br />

reliable, statistical base is necessary for<br />

the establishment of priorities, the allocation of<br />

resources and, indeed, for all flrogress in highway<br />

safety.<br />

The National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />

has a growing ability to collect valid, timely, and<br />

reliable accident data through a graduated national<br />

program of data collection. The scope of the program<br />

includes drivers, pedestrians, vehicles, collision<br />

types, injuries, environmental factors, and<br />

exposure data.*<br />

A dual approach is used:<br />

l. A national program using State and local<br />

records.<br />

2. On-site investigation of a representative sample<br />

of accidents.<br />

NCSA collects, standardizes, and interprets information<br />

now kept at the State and local levels.<br />

Police accident reports, driver licensing records,<br />

motor vehicle registrations, highway inventories,<br />

medical, and other records are included. Trained<br />

professional teams investigate accidents in the<br />

field, examining such topics as pre-crash factors,<br />

injury mechanisms and crash configurations. This<br />

dual approach covers the full spectrum from<br />

driver and vehicle exposure rates to the causes of<br />

accident injuries.<br />

rlnformation about the amount and types of driving.<br />

The statistics provide national data to track trends<br />

and detect problems such as fatalities by type, injuries<br />

by severity, and involvements by specific<br />

vehicle type. They also constitute an objective<br />

basis to set and evaluate highway and motor vehicle<br />

standards such as thos€ on fuel tank integrity,<br />

side crash protection, and vehicle exterior modification.<br />

NCSA is responsible for accident studies<br />

from the experimental design through data collection,<br />

storage, analysis, and dissemination.<br />

As NCSA's programs become operational, highway<br />

safety problems may be treated as a whole<br />

rather than as fragmented parts. NCSA and its investigation<br />

teams will support the highway safety<br />

research work of industry, private groups, and<br />

Government at all levels, and will coordinate with<br />

other statistical centers and agencies, national and<br />

international.<br />

NCSA operates and manages the following national<br />

data collection systems:<br />

t The National Accident Sampltng System<br />

t/N,4SS/-a network of 35 to 60 teams collecting<br />

nationally representative accident data, performing<br />

special studies, and running exposure surveys.<br />

The first ten teams have completed training and<br />

have started preliminary data collection at the<br />

initial NASS sites (see Figure 3). Following evaluation<br />

of this pilot test, full scale operation of the<br />

NASS Continuous Sampling System will begin at<br />

these sites in 1979. The entire network is expected<br />

to be operational by 1981.<br />

t The Futal Accident Reporting System<br />

(FARS)- now in its fourth year of operation,<br />

provides statistical data on all fatal accidents in<br />

the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto<br />

r3


1|<br />

I<br />

SKAGIT/$AN JUAN/<br />

ISLAND CO.<br />

Rico. Improvements have been made in the standardization<br />

and quality control of information<br />

received from police accident reports, medical<br />

reports, driver licensing files, and highway and<br />

motor vehicle registration files. A remote data<br />

entry proiect to speed accident case submissions to<br />

Washington, I).C. has been tested and is in operation.<br />

Until NASS becomes fully operational, the following<br />

interim systems will supply data necded to support<br />

NHTSA rulemaking:<br />

o The National Crash Severity Study (NCSS/ is<br />

an eflfort to link vehicle damage with injury severity.<br />

More than 10,000 towaway accidents are being<br />

investigated by seven teams throughout the country<br />

over a 3-year period. Special emphasis will be<br />

placed on certain accident types, to permit evaluation<br />

of the standards on fire and fuel leakage and<br />

on side door guard beams, and to examine the<br />

possible extension of passenger car safety standards<br />

to light trucks, vans, and multipurpose<br />

passenger vehicles.<br />

t The Pedestrian Injury Causation Study<br />

(Prcil was initiated to examine injury causes during<br />

vehicle/pedestrian collisions. Five accident<br />

t4<br />

!Ir4I!M<br />

CENTRAL CITY: 1O LARG EST SMSAs<br />

CENTRAL CITY oF rr.60 LARGEST SMSA9<br />

ill SUBUFSAN dF 17 LARGEST SMSA9: LOW GA$ $ALES<br />

SUBURtsAN OF 17 LAHGEST SMSAs: NIGH GA$ SALES<br />

SUBLIRBAN OF 18 60 LAFGE$T $M$As PLU$ PSUr WITHIN<br />

61. I 1 9 LA R6 EST SMSAS NdT CONT AI NI NG C ENT RAL C I TY<br />

pSU WITHIN 61 119 LAffGEST SMSATCONTAINING CENTRAL clTY<br />

vtl ALL OTHEH AREASj PSUs CONTAINING TOWNS OV6H I97I8;<br />

LOW GAS SALES<br />

Vlll ALL OTHEn AAEA$; P$Ur CONTATNING TOVINS OVER l97l8j<br />

HIGH GAS SALES<br />

lX ALL OTHER AREAS; PSUtWITH NO TOWN OVER 1S7lE;<br />

LOW GAS SALES<br />

x ALLOTHERAHEA$;FSUTWIIHNOTOWNOVEAI9TISi<br />

HIGH GAS SALES<br />

ABKNSAS<br />

t --t-r-!ffiJ*'"<br />

-\ \.<br />

onrrns OALLAS co. CO. exir. EXCL. / (BIRMINGHAM<br />

IBIRMINGHAM suBURl<br />

oALLAs ctTY L_ {vl<br />

Figure 3. NationalAccldent Sampllng System<br />

tvil t)<br />

I<br />

DF LAWARE CO.<br />

PEN NSY LVANIA<br />

{PHILADELPHIA $UBUFB}<br />

FT, LAUOEFOALE/<br />

HOLLYWOOD CITY<br />

FLORIOA<br />

{ilI<br />

teams will investigate more than 2,0(X) selected<br />

accidents during a 3-year period. The study will<br />

identify such injury-producing agents as "unforgiving"<br />

protrusions and may have major implications<br />

on vehicle profile design.<br />

t The Injury Severity Reporting System rISRS/,<br />

an extension of the Consumer Product Safety<br />

Commission's National Electronic lnjury Surveillance<br />

System, will provide data on traffic accident<br />

injuries from persons admitted to emergency<br />

rooms in 130 hospitals. The system will identify<br />

primary injuries, overall injury severity, and some<br />

related basic accident descriptors.<br />

Differential Yelocity Crash Recorder<br />

A mechanical, cigarette-packet-sized crash recorder<br />

is being developed and evaluated for its<br />

ability to sense automatically and record the differential<br />

velocity of a vehicle undergoing a crash.<br />

The recorder would be dormant, but ready to<br />

record, under normal vehicle operating conditions.<br />

When perfected, the crash recorder will permit the<br />

accumulation of accident data (differential crash<br />

velocities) at about $4*$6 per vehicle on a high<br />

volume basis.


CHAPTER 4<br />

CRASH<br />

SURVIVABILITY<br />

Occupant Protection<br />

Volkswagen Rabbit, and may be installed on other<br />

vehicles.<br />

On June 30, 1977, the Secretary of Transportation,<br />

Brock Adams. announced that all full-sized<br />

passenger cars manufactuted for sale or use in the<br />

United States must be equipped with fronr-seat<br />

passive restraint systems to protect occupants<br />

from injury in crashes, beginning with the lg8z<br />

model year (MY). In MY 1983, all intermediate<br />

and compact cars must be so equipped, and by<br />

MY 1984, all passenger cars will be required to<br />

have front-seat passive protection systems.<br />

The design and type of system to be used is the<br />

manufacturer's option, but he must certify that<br />

the vehicle meets the performance requiremcnts of<br />

FMVSS No. ?08, Occupant Crash Protection.<br />

The second system is the air-cushion or air bag.<br />

The air-cushion system consists of a crash sensor<br />

near the front side of the vehicle, a passenger air<br />

bag and inflator in the right side of the dashboard,<br />

a driver air bag and intlator in the hub of the steering<br />

wheel, knee restraints, and a diagnostic system<br />

to monitor readiness. If the car is involved in a<br />

frontal crash equivalent to or rnore than a l0- to<br />

l2-mph crash into a solid barrier, the impact<br />

causes the sensor to activate the inflator. The<br />

occupants' torsos and heads move forward into<br />

the soft bags, while the lower bodies are restrained<br />

by air bags or knee restraints. The air bag and<br />

knee restraints absorb the occupants' energy by<br />

The generally negative response of the American distributing forces more evenly over their bodies.<br />

motoring public to the protection from automobile<br />

crash injuries that lap and shoulder belrs can<br />

furnish motivated the mandate from Secretary<br />

Adams. Last year, more than 26,600 passenger car<br />

occupants were killed in crashes. Of these, more<br />

than 23,100 were drivers or front-seat pas$engers.<br />

One-hundred percent use of the lap and shoulder<br />

The cost of air-cushion systems ranges from $90 to<br />

$235, depending upon the assumptions made.<br />

DOT estimate$ that full front-seat air-cushion<br />

systems will cost $l l2 once they are in full production.<br />

Passive-belt systerns are estimated to cost<br />

between $25 and $50.<br />

belts (required in cars since 1968) would have pre- DOT estimates that 9,000 lives will be saved and<br />

vented more than 50 percent of these fatalities. 65,000 moderate-to-serious injuries will be pre-<br />

Safety belts must be fastened each time the occupant<br />

gets into the car to be effective. For a variety<br />

of reasons, only about 20 percent of the motoring<br />

vented each year, once all cars are equipped with<br />

passive restraints. The small additional cost of<br />

passive restraints is well worth it, considering that<br />

public bothers to buckle up. Passive re$traints, on the current estimated cost to society of each traffic<br />

the other hand, require no buckling or fastening to fataliry is over $280,000.<br />

be effective. They are there, and operational,<br />

when a crash occurs.<br />

During 1977, extensive testing of child restraint<br />

$ystems was conducted by NHTSA's new Engi-<br />

Currently, there are two basic types of passive neering Test Facility (ETF) at East Liberty, Ohio.<br />

restraint systems. One is a safety-belt sysfem that Under an agreement with the Transportation<br />

is designed to move into place when the front-seat Research Center (TRC), the ETF urilizes the dy-<br />

occupants enter the vehicle and close the doors.<br />

(Figure 4). There is no action required by the occupants.<br />

Passive belts are currently available on the<br />

namic crash simulation facility for quick reaction<br />

tests to support rulemaking activities. NHTSA is<br />

considering a new child restraint safety standard,<br />

15<br />

i


*W<br />

to be published during 1978. Some 20 types of<br />

child restraints were tested during the past year t'or<br />

conformity with the proposed criteria. (Figures 5<br />

and 6).<br />

Vehicle Structures<br />

Programs are underway to improve side impact<br />

crashworthiness of comp.act and subcompact<br />

vehicles through minor modifications to ther side<br />

structures. Weight increases for given levels of improvement<br />

in structural integrity will be determined.<br />

Data generated from both crush and crash<br />

testing (Figure 7) determine correlations between a<br />

variety of side impact $tatic and dynamic deformations.<br />

lt has been found that reduction in side<br />

intrusion can be achieved with modifications involving<br />

only modest weight addition to the front<br />

door structure. This has been achieved by:<br />

r Increasing the strength of the door beams.<br />

r Placing the door beams at elevations where<br />

they engage the vehicle bumper striking them during<br />

impact.<br />

16<br />

Figure 4. Automatlc Safety Belt System<br />

r Modifying the door structure so that the<br />

door, the pillars, and the sill behave more as a unit<br />

during impact.<br />

Investigations also are underway to evaluate the<br />

effects that modification of side structure interior<br />

Figure 5. Child and Infant Restraint Systems


W<br />

Figure 6. Experimental Child Restrainl $eat<br />

padding will have on reducing vehicle occupant<br />

injuries during side impact.<br />

A moving barrier impactor and test procedures to<br />

analyze and assess vehicle side structures also are<br />

being developed, to facilitate the analysis of vehicle<br />

side structures in compliance testing, and to<br />

furnish a more reliable test device.<br />

Other side impact tests are being run, to validate<br />

an advanced computer simulation program called<br />

'*Wrecker,"<br />

which is designed to predict vehicle<br />

structural deformations. The result.s can be applied<br />

to improving vehicle crashworthiness.<br />

Another computer program ("Safety Systerns Optimization<br />

Model"), now being refined, will make<br />

possible analysis of occupant response in a variety<br />

of collisions between vehicles of differing designs.<br />

Pedestrinn Protection<br />

The feasibility of designing exrerior surfaces of<br />

motor vehicles that are less injurious to pedestrians<br />

was fostered by a computer study and a<br />

limited number of dummy tests. A test device that<br />

measures the characteristics of specific vehicle surfaces<br />

with various body forms has been designed.<br />

Tests are underway to demonstrate that there is a<br />

potential for specifying the responses of these<br />

body forms, so as to mitigate pedestrian injuries<br />

without sacrificing safety and functional requirements.<br />

A description of additional work on pedestrian<br />

protection may be found in the section on lntegrated<br />

Vehicle Systems.<br />

.#Fitfrte{#rflri{'i{'r' :<br />

Figure 7. $ide lmpact Testing to Determine<br />

a Variety of Deformations<br />

17


Biomechanics<br />

The development of a safety syslem requires an<br />

instrument that can record and assess the occupant<br />

crash protection provided by that system. Such an<br />

instrument is the anthropomorphic test dummy<br />

(Figure 8). In order to be effective, the dummy<br />

must possess two basic characteristics.<br />

First, it must respond in a reasonably human-like<br />

way when it is subjected to forces typical of a crash<br />

environment. Secondly, these responses must be<br />

related to the level of injury which would have<br />

Figure 8. Adult Male DummY<br />

occurred to a human had he responded similarly.<br />

Laboratory testing and computer modeling are<br />

used to define these characteristics. The research<br />

will culminate in a test dummy that possesses a<br />

high level of human fidelity and can, through its<br />

responses, predict injury to actual humans more<br />

accurately than is otherwise possible.<br />

An anthropomorphic child dummy, with which to<br />

test compliance with child restraint systems, has<br />

been selected and modified. Future plans include<br />

judicious exercise of mathematical models designed<br />

to simulate the child; this is expected to<br />

yield data for the design and construction of valid<br />

child dummies.<br />

During the last year, research has continued to<br />

define the relationship between force application<br />

and the response of the thorax and the head/neck<br />

complex, especially in side and rear crashes, As<br />

mentioned above, results of this research will be<br />

used to develop test dummy specifications for a<br />

more human-like dummy. Additionally, the research<br />

is leading to a greater understanding of the<br />

relationship between force application, human<br />

response, and injury. This expansion of the data<br />

base on injury criteria will permit design of dummies<br />

whose motions and impacts can be better correlated<br />

with human injury. The responses will be<br />

sufficiently repeatable for use in compliance test<br />

procedures.<br />

Integrated Vehicle Systems Program<br />

The Integrated Vehicle Systems program, formerly<br />

the Research Safety Vehicle (RSV) program,<br />

is developing experimental vehicles that will<br />

permit survival of occupants in a variety of severe<br />

crashes, and will simultaneously meet other national<br />

goals in pedestrian safety, fuel economy,<br />

emissions, damageability, and cost of ownership<br />

(Table 6).<br />

Initial RSV studies made in 1974 by five Phase I<br />

contractors developed specifications for experimental<br />

four and five-passenger vehicles to meet<br />

the goals of the 1980's. From results of this research,<br />

two contractors (Calspan Corporation of<br />

Bulfalo, New York, and Minicars, Inc., of Coleta,<br />

California) were selected to continue the design<br />

and development of their proposed vehicle concepts<br />

under Phase II contracts (197511976).<br />

During the past year, under DOT contracts for<br />

Phase III of the RSV program, Calspan and Mini-


Table 6. Comparison of Integrated Vehicle System Goals<br />

Typlcal 1977<br />

Production Small Car<br />

VW<br />

Research Vehicle<br />

Calspan/Chrysler<br />

Research Vehicle<br />

Vehlcle Weight 3500 2000 3000 2570<br />

Vehicle compartment<br />

No. of pass.<br />

Volume<br />

Performance<br />

0 to 60 mph accel.<br />

60 to 0 mph braking dlstance<br />

Occupant crash protection<br />

Frontal barrier<br />

Car-to-car side<br />

Bumper protection (no damage')<br />

Fronl<br />

Bear<br />

Gombined cycle fuel economy<br />

Gasoline engine<br />

Research diesel<br />

5 Passenger<br />

68-87 cu. ft.<br />

10-20 sec.<br />

165-190 ft.<br />

Level I<br />

Up to 30 mph'<br />

Up to 20 mph-<br />

5 mph..<br />

5 mph.*<br />

11-42 mpg<br />

5 Passen-gtr<br />

80 cu, ft,<br />

13.5 sec.<br />

167 ft.<br />

Level ll<br />

,10 mph<br />

30 mph<br />

5 mph'*<br />

5 mph"<br />

34 mpg<br />

60 mpg<br />

5 Passenger<br />

83 cu. ft.<br />

16-18 sec.<br />

153 ft.<br />

Level lll<br />

45-50 mph<br />

40-45 mph<br />

I mph<br />

5 mph<br />

30 mpg<br />

42 mpg<br />

Mlnlcars<br />

Research Vehicle<br />

4 Passenger<br />

98 cu. ft.<br />

16 sec.<br />

131<br />

ft.<br />

Level lll<br />

50 + mph<br />

45 + mph<br />

10 mph<br />

5 mph<br />

34 mpg<br />

55 mpg<br />

Emissions Level I Level ll Level ll Level ll<br />

'Assum€s<br />

rggtralnt systems ar6 worn<br />

**Damage<br />

to non-safety-related it€ms allow€d<br />

cars have continued work to complete their<br />

designs and fabricate test vehicles.<br />

(l) Vehicle Occupant Protection<br />

(2) Aggressivity Limitation<br />

Phase IV activity, including crash testing of the<br />

research vehicles, will begin in 1978, forevaluation<br />

of safety, emissions, fuel economy, and damageability.<br />

In addition to creating a data base for<br />

future safety, damageability, and fuel economy<br />

standards, the program is expected to demonstrate<br />

the levels of performance that can be expected and<br />

to encourage industry to adopt the technological<br />

advances and innovations. The RSV program is a<br />

continuation of the Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />

(3) Pedestrian Protection<br />

(4) Aerodynamic Drag Reduction<br />

(5) weieht<br />

(6) Headlamp Installation<br />

(7) Engine Cooling Airflow<br />

(8) Low-Speed Collision Damage Reduction<br />

(9) Appearance<br />

(10) Cost<br />

(l l) Material Applications<br />

(12) Producibility<br />

(ESV) program under which ESV's were developed<br />

and evaluated in the United States, and under<br />

which the International ESV Program (see Special<br />

Programs, International Cooperation) was initiated<br />

and supported.<br />

The Calspan RSV project will result in the design<br />

of an integrated automobile. Evaluations of vehicles<br />

built to this design will provide data on the<br />

effectiveness of the many trade-off decisions<br />

necessary to reach the final design. For example,<br />

the major design considerations for the front end<br />

of an RSV are:<br />

These considerations involve safety (1, 2, and 3),<br />

fuel economy (4 and 5), and vehicle performance<br />

(6 and 7) as well as consumer concerns for cost<br />

and appearance (8, 9, and l0). While some of<br />

these considerations are clearly compatible and<br />

can be satisfied with a common approach, others<br />

are conflicting and some trade-offs must be made.<br />

Retractable headlamps, for example, provide a<br />

smooth aerodynamic shape when retracted, but<br />

add cost and weight and pose a potential pedestrian<br />

hazard when raised for night operations.<br />

Plastic headlamp covers that smooth aerodynamic<br />

19


flow (see Figure 9) have been eliminated from<br />

U.S. cars because of FMVSS No. 108 restrictions<br />

on the potential impairment of light effectiveness'<br />

For the Calspan RSV, these covers increase fuel<br />

economy by 1.5 mpg on the Environmental Protection<br />

Agency (EPA) highway cycle (0.8 mpg<br />

combined highway and city). Headlamp performance<br />

will be evaluated to determine the severity of<br />

any light degradation.<br />

Pedestrian injury reduction is obtained on the<br />

Calspan RSV by the use of "soft" foam-filled<br />

front bumpers into which slots are cut to permit<br />

airflow for radiator cooling. Closing off some of<br />

these slots would potentially improve pedestrian<br />

protection and reduce drag, but might also cause<br />

the engine to overheat.<br />

The design solution for the Calspan RSV frontend<br />

is an outstanding example of engineering<br />

improvements attainable through attention to<br />

trade*offs. Pedestrian protection concepts have<br />

been incorporated while aerodynamic drag and<br />

weight have been reduced. At the same time, lowspeed<br />

collision damage protection has been<br />

increased to I mph from the current 5 mph. Appearance<br />

is pleasing and cost, as determined by<br />

materials and production concerns, is kept low.<br />

The Minicars RSV project is accomplishing objectives<br />

similar to the Calspan RSV, but with a substantially<br />

different vehicle configuration (see<br />

Figure l0).<br />

The Minicars RSv engine./driveline is located in<br />

the rear, thereby providing opportunity to design<br />

20<br />

Figure 9. Experimental Headlamp Covers<br />

to lncrease Fuel EconomY<br />

Figure 10. New Minicar RSV Design<br />

the front-end energy management characteristic$<br />

to use the approximately 45 inches of available<br />

structural crush, to make 50-mph occupant protection<br />

feasible (Figure 11). The Minicars frontend<br />

also is designed to reduce pedestrian injuries<br />

up to approximately 25 mph, eliminate danger in<br />

rigid barrier crashes up to approximately l0 mph,<br />

restrict damage to a l6-inch, readily replaceable,<br />

bolt-on module in up to 20-mph barrier crashes,<br />

and impart nonaggressive, low-level crash load*<br />

ings to any other vehicle struck by the RSV.<br />

The Minicars Phase III also will refine the RSV<br />

design, after which construction of vehicles fbr<br />

Government evaluation in Phase IV is planned.<br />

The unique foam-filled, lightweight structure of<br />

the Minicars RSV is being utilized in the design<br />

and construction of a six-passenger car weighing<br />

less than 3,000 pounds. This car is being designed<br />

to give occupant crash survivability to at Ieast<br />

40-mph frontal barrier requirements. Fuel<br />

economy of at least 27.5 mpg in the combined<br />

EPA cycle, while satisfying statutory emission requirements,<br />

will be possible with the use of an<br />

advanced engine being developed by Volvo. The<br />

engine will be front wheel drive, with transverse<br />

engine configuration. The additional vehicle crush<br />

that is obtained will provide more protection for<br />

the restrained occupant. The vehicle styling, exterior<br />

dimension$, and passenger compartment size<br />

are those of the General Motors 1977 Chevrolet<br />

Impala. Side and transverse vehicle structures will


yn {@*iffNpryr,'H$v<br />

pHl$E I c0ilFlcunATt0tl<br />

STNATFIGO GHARSEO SO CU. N- Hffi<br />

WITH S.SPEEII<br />

ff<br />

iJl<br />

rufl tTmtff cEtr{'<br />

be improved, to insrease occupant protection<br />

from side impact. Preliminary guidance to rulemakers<br />

on achievable safety goals in light, sixpassenger<br />

integrated vehicles will result from these<br />

programs.<br />

Work is under way on the application of turbocharging<br />

to achieve higher performance from the<br />

1.6 liter (98 cubic inch) Honda engine without<br />

F.PA fuel economy degradation in the four-passenger<br />

RSV. An automatic five-speed transmission<br />

system, which eliminates need for a fluid torque<br />

converter with its associated fuel economy degradation,<br />

is under development for RSV application.<br />

This transmission with microprocessor control<br />

should improve fuel economy over that of the<br />

basic five-speed stick shift, by ensuring most<br />

efficient engine operation commensurate with<br />

driver-controlled acceleration and steadv srare<br />

speed demands.<br />

Volkswagen of Germany participates in the Integrated<br />

Vehicle Program by developing, under<br />

contract, a data base for lightweight automotive<br />

-ELA8T LIITIATED EITZIIE<br />

;#<br />

13 CU. FT. TUEAAEE YOLIJffi"'<br />

s0 wfl PAsswt oilYER tx0<br />

Pt8ffrEE8 HE8Tf,AnT8<br />

BACI( & PilflT<br />

A&E m8t StStH<br />

$fl.3 SrArE [AoAi<br />

ALPIIITffNffi D$PIAY t0 Ffi I0-DAHASI<br />

FNHfT HffiR<br />

FILTEO MOR S FoAt [{TEnnF PAooiltG<br />

Nll| FLAT BAIilAT<br />

F'I IIO.OATAGE f,EAR flTFEI<br />

I WI{EEI AiTt-toCX 0t8G EnAXES<br />

. WHEEL HOEFTIIIETT SUSPEH$Mil F0IFF|U.E0 tffiEr srEt ililfttttE<br />

Figure 11. RSV Phase ll Configuration<br />

diesel power plants suitable for use in the RSV's.<br />

Data on fuel economy, regulated and unregulated<br />

exhaust emissions, odor, noise, driveability, acceleration<br />

and other attributes of these engine and<br />

vehicle systems were provided. The engines were<br />

evaluated for compatibility with vehicles of advanced<br />

crashworthiness characteristics. A turbocharged<br />

diesel engine was installed in two vehicles,<br />

which were tested for performance, fuel economy,<br />

and emission by NHTSA and EPA. One model<br />

(Figures 12 and 13) was the Integrated Research<br />

VW (IRVW), originally developed by Volkswagen<br />

under the ESV Program as a gasoline-enginepowered<br />

safety vehicle. This vehicle achieved a<br />

frontal crashworthiness of 40 mph and a combined<br />

cycle fuel economy of about 60 mpg.<br />

Since NHTSA has regulatory responsibility in the<br />

area of fuel economy in addition to safety, it was<br />

necessary that consideration be given to the relationship<br />

between national goals in safety and<br />

energy conservation, as well as other economic<br />

and consumer interests, including environmental<br />

21


Figure 12. Section View ot VW RSV with Turbocharged Diesel Englne<br />

protection. Meeting these expanded goals required<br />

further effort in systems analysis. Integrated Vehicle<br />

Systems studies were used in support of the<br />

Federal Task Force on Motor Vehicle Goals<br />

Beyond 1980, whose findings were published in<br />

r976.<br />

Some of the trade-offs associated with regulation<br />

of the automobile can be illustrated by considering<br />

alternatives affecting fuel economy. The matrix<br />

shown in Table 7 illustrates the alternatives be'<br />

tween consumer choices, technology choices, and<br />

variations in safety and emissions (regulated).<br />

Other factors, such as cost, damageability, and<br />

marketing, also must be considered.<br />

For regulatory planning, it is necessary to assess<br />

the national cost, fuel consumption, lives and injuries<br />

saved, and other factors associated with<br />

advanced technology alternatives. The lntegrated<br />

Vehicle Systems hardware program can buttress<br />

the analytical trade-off studies. Each of the<br />

vehicles illustrated represents a data point which<br />

T2<br />

verifies or updates the predictions made in the<br />

motor vehicle goals study.<br />

The trade-offs made in connection with the program<br />

will yield an understanding of the interactions<br />

of safety, fuel economy, vehicle performance,<br />

and cost, and form an essential part of the<br />

data base for NHTSA standards.<br />

. r<br />

Figure 13. VWTurbocharged Diesel Engine<br />

Experimental Vehicle


Table 7. Alternatives Affecting Fuel Economy<br />

Consumer Choices Tech nology Alternatives Safety/Emissions Criterir<br />

INTERIOR<br />

VOLUME<br />

ACCEL. PERF<br />

O TO 60 MPH<br />

STRUCTURE ENGINE THANSMISSION SAFETY EMISSIONS<br />

3 CHOTCES 2 CHOTCES 3 CHOTCES4 CHOICES 2 CHOICES 3 CHOTCES3 CHOTCES<br />

CURRENT<br />

4<br />

PASStrNGtrF CUHRENT LEVEL I LEVEL I<br />

6<br />

PASSENGEF<br />

15 SEC TOP'75 CURRENT<br />

WEIGHT<br />

coNSCtOltS<br />

20 SEC DIESEL UPGRADED<br />

LEVEL II LEVEL II<br />

6<br />

PASSENGEF INNOVATIVE LEVEL III LEVEL III<br />

ADVANCED<br />

ENGINE: CUHRENT-AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY PEFFORMANCE FOR 1975 FLEET<br />

TOP'7s_BEST FUEL ECONOMY PERFORMANCE<br />

FOR 197S FLEET<br />

TRANSMISSION: CURRENT-3€PEED AUTOMATIC<br />

UPGRADE_TORQUE CONVERTER, 4-SPEED LOCK.UP<br />

$THUCTURE: GURRENT-AVERAGE'75<br />

WEIGHT CONSCIOUS-FIRST STEP IN SIGNIFICANT WEIGHI REDUCfION WITHOUT SACHIFICING INTERIOR<br />

SPACE<br />

INNOVATIVE_SECOND STEP IN WEIGHT NEDUCTION UTILIZING 10% TO 15% PLASTIC/ALUMINUM SUBSTITU-<br />

TION<br />

SAFETY: LEVEL Ii 30 MPH FRONTr'.-<br />

LEVEL ll: 40 MPH FBONTAL;20 MPH S|DE<br />

LEVEL lll: 50 MPH FRONTA-<br />

EMISSIONS:<br />

LEVEL l: 1.5-HG/15.0-CO/3.1-NO" (gnr/mi)<br />

LEVEL ll: .41 HC/3.4-CO/2.0 NO* (gm/ml)<br />

LEVEL lll: .41 HC/3.4CO/0.4-NO, (gm/mi)


CHAPTER 5<br />

CRASH AVOIDANCE<br />

Vehicle Handling<br />

Vehicle handling research investigates the complex<br />

relationship between driver and machine. Driver<br />

research includes consideration of the driver's<br />

physical limitations, experience, and tasks encountered.<br />

Vehicle research evaluates the response of<br />

the machine to the demands of the driver and to<br />

environmental conditions such as rough roads or<br />

winds.<br />

To study vehicle response to cross winds and bow<br />

winds created by passing vehicles, a sophisticated<br />

wind machine has been designed and is being fabricated.<br />

This machine is composed of eight modular<br />

wind generators which, by physical placement,<br />

are capable of simulating many kinds of wind<br />

disturbances. The wind generators (Figure 14) are<br />

portable for varying field set-ups and are highway<br />

transportable. Design validation will be accomplished<br />

by using wind tunnels as calibration standards<br />

and by conducting full-scale vehicle tests. The<br />

Flgure 14. Portable Wind Generator<br />

effects of aerodynamic disturbances on vehicle<br />

design and vehicle handling will be determined.<br />

Another portable facility under construction will<br />

measure dynamic properties, such as moments of<br />

inertia of vehicles weighing up to 10,000 pounds.<br />

These data are essential for accurate mathematical<br />

simulations, and will support other research<br />

activities.<br />

A passenger car-trailer study (Figure l5), completed<br />

in 1977, worked out methods which enable<br />

trailer owners to optimiee load-equalization hitch<br />

settings. A previous phase had found that manufacturers'<br />

recommended settings were not the<br />

best, and could result in instability at relatively<br />

low speeds. In general, poor load-equalization can<br />

cause inferior braking performance, overloaded<br />

tires, and poorly aimed headlights.<br />

Research on large articulated vehicles continues.<br />

Frame torsional stiffness (which is insignificant in<br />

the case of passenger cars) is important in large<br />

vehicles because high centers of gravity and heavy<br />

loads impose extreme stresses that affect tire loadings<br />

and stability. Computer simulation, as well as<br />

full-scale vehicle testing, is used to measure these<br />

effects and to develop modifications for improved<br />

yaw and rollover stability. Physical parameters<br />

affected include frame stiffness, location and free<br />

play of fifth-wheel axle loading, and front and<br />

rear roll stiffness. Two tractor-trailer combination<br />

vehicles will be modified, fully instrurnented, and<br />

tested, to verify design and simulation results.<br />

While passenger cars and large vehicles receive<br />

most attention, the handling and stability of<br />

motorcycles cannot be overlooked (Figure 16).<br />

Test procedures suitable for handling and stability<br />

rulemaking are near completion, and progress has<br />

25


Flgure 15. Car.Traller Combination lllustratingFavorable<br />

Load Equallzation<br />

been made in the development of a low-eost antilock<br />

brake system for motorcycles. A wheel-speed<br />

sensor has been fabricated and has undergone<br />

extensive analysis.<br />

Tires and Wheels<br />

Three manufacturers of tire retreading equipment<br />

have undertaken the design and fabrication of an<br />

automatic, non-destructive, test system fbr tire<br />

casings which should be on the market in 1978.<br />

The design is based on the transmission of ultrasonics<br />

throueh the tire casing, a system developed<br />

by NHTSA. The equipment will give the industry<br />

a low-cost method for selecting only sound casings<br />

for retread, to the benefit of the public in quality<br />

and safety.<br />

Final validation of the reflection ultrasonic system<br />

for evaluating new tires continues (Figure l7). ln<br />

addition to its versatility in compliance testing,<br />

research and development, and quality control,<br />

the system has the capability of locating overbuff<br />

in retread tires. Refinement of the current design<br />

will result in a cost-beneficial system for compliance<br />

testing new and retread tires.<br />

A tire casing bead tester designed by NHTSA is<br />

being tested. The system can be retrofitted to existing<br />

visual tire inspecting units in the retread industry<br />

(Figure l8), to detect faulty beads in casings<br />

being processed for retread. It will identify kinks,<br />

26<br />

',' ,..r)i,il<br />

r,<br />

' -*i* ,", ,,,,<br />

broken wire, and beads not normally found by<br />

existing inspection techniques. The design will be<br />

made available to all interested parties in the retread<br />

industry.<br />

An accelerated tire treadwear test technique also is<br />

being assessed. This method would permit tire<br />

treadwear grading to be accomplished in less than<br />

50 miles, without the use of a special course or<br />

control tire. Results of lull treadwear testing in<br />

Nevada, Connecticut, and Texas will be correlated<br />

with the respective accelerated treadwear test<br />

results.<br />

Figure 16. Motorcycle Equipped<br />

with<br />

Experimental Salety Devlces


'ffi,<br />

I<br />

t I<br />

Flgure17.<br />

Ultrasonic Tlrc Testing System<br />

Figure 18. Tire Casing Bead Tester<br />

The final Uniform Tire Quality Gracling (UTeC)<br />

regulation, challenged by eight domestic tire manufacturers,<br />

was upheld by the United States Court<br />

of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On March ?1.<br />

{<br />

1977, the Supreme court denied the petition of the<br />

manufacturers to review the lower court's decision.<br />

FMVSS No. 109 was amended to permit manufacture<br />

of a new series of tires having load ratings and<br />

inflation pressures expressed in metric units and a<br />

newly designed tire having a maximum inflation<br />

pressure of 60 psi. The change to metric units is in<br />

consonance with a world-wide standardization<br />

process. The 60 psi tires are substitutes for con_<br />

ventional spare tires, designed to reduce overall<br />

weight and increase storage space in passenger car<br />

trunks.<br />

Brakes<br />

The NHTSA Safety Research Laboratory (SRL)<br />

initiated a test program to evaluate operational<br />

problems with heavy-duty combination vehicles<br />

when pre-FMVSS No. 12l, and FMVSS No. lll<br />

braking systems are interrnixed (Figure l9). The<br />

SRL test program includes three basic kinds of<br />

combination vehicles: tractor with trailer, tracror<br />

with double rrailer, and truck with full trailer. Over<br />

3,000 test runs in accident avoidance maneuvers<br />

under various conditions of loading and road surfaces<br />

have been completed. Preliminary findings<br />

indicate that compatibility problems do not exist<br />

in accident avoidance maneuvers and that the use<br />

of a FMVSS No. 121 braking system on any axle<br />

in the combination actually improves performance.<br />

Further testing in 1978 will evaluate compatibility<br />

problems that mighr exist in mountain<br />

descent operations.<br />

Research continue$ to establish the braking performance<br />

capability of hydraulically braked passenger<br />

cars on low and split-coefficient surfaces,<br />

for both straight and curved path braking. preliminary<br />

data analysis indicates that there is no<br />

significant difference in stopping performance<br />

between straight-line and curved-path braking, for<br />

vehicles which comply with FMVSS No. 105-75. A<br />

vehicle's braking performance on high-coefficient<br />

(dry) surfaces is not necessarily related to its stopping<br />

ability on low-coefficient (wet) surfaces. For<br />

this reason, additional testing on low-coefficient<br />

surfaces, for possible inclusion in FMVSS No.<br />

105-75, is planned. Tests of an advanced concept,<br />

antiJock equipped vehicle showed that braking in<br />

a turn on split-coefficient surfaces may be used to<br />

establish better performance requirements for<br />

braking systems.<br />

n


f*#<br />

'"'i -'-,<br />

I<br />

,l.<br />

"'?.f..., ".s" 1,,;/|'ffi<br />

,r,fr*""; . " t' ;'] ''r,:,<br />

Figure 19. Testlng Safety Problems Due to Intermixed Braking Systems<br />

During 1977, two engineering models of a selfcontained<br />

radar system were designed and fabricated.<br />

One model was installed in a passenger car<br />

equipped with an hydraulic-boo$t brake system,<br />

and the other in a car with a vacuum-boosted<br />

brake system. Limited test result$ were encourag'<br />

ing with respect to stopping distances, and in the<br />

fact that the radar systems of on-coming vehicles<br />

did not cancel out one another.<br />

The Driver nnd the Yehicle<br />

The interaction between the driver and his vehicle<br />

consists of three major areas, all of which play important<br />

roles in traffic safety.<br />

l. Lishtins- Vehicle lighting and signaling<br />

systems are important for adequate seeing<br />

distance at nighttime and for inter-vehicle<br />

communication during all types of driving<br />

conditions. During 1977, NHTSA received<br />

15 petitions to amend FMVSS No. 108 to upgrade<br />

headlamp candlepower, revise motorcycle<br />

headlight requirements, and make<br />

other changes to lighting and signaling systems.<br />

ln addition. NHTSA continued a<br />

W<br />

research and testing program to support<br />

future revisions to Standard No. 108. Major<br />

topics of investigations were (l) hiehmounted<br />

rear stop and turn signals, (2) various<br />

deceleration signals, (3) vehicle foe lieht<br />

systems, (4) signal liehtine needs for emergency<br />

vehicles, school buses, and service<br />

vehicles, (5) methods to aid in motorcycle<br />

visibility, and (6) a single beam headlamp<br />

system. Of particular interest were the results<br />

of a field evaluation which found that cars<br />

equipped with a supplemental center, highmounted<br />

brake lieht had over 50 percent<br />

fewer rear-end accidents than cars with conventional<br />

rear-end lights.<br />

NHTSA has initiated research on electrical<br />

system integrity and electromagnetic interference.<br />

As part of this effort, NHTSA is<br />

working with the Consumer Froducts Safety<br />

Commission on the problem of exploding<br />

car batteries and the need for a safetv standard.<br />

2. Visibility- Driver visibility standards include<br />

FMVSS No. 103 on defrosting and<br />

defogging, No. 104 on windshield wiping


and washing, No. 107 on sunlight glare reduction,<br />

and No. I I I on rearview mirror<br />

systems. NHTSA is developing a regulation<br />

on "Fields of Direct View" and investigating<br />

the problem of vehicle splash and spray.<br />

Research and testing programs underway include<br />

(l) peripheral vision and driving performance,<br />

(2) glare in rearview mirrors from<br />

various types of headlamps, (3) a method to<br />

determine the effects of vehicle obstructions<br />

and mirror placement upon driver performance,<br />

(4) truck plane and convex mirror systems,<br />

involving field tests to evaluate driver<br />

performance, (5) a defogging test for evaluating<br />

the merits of school bus defogging<br />

systems, (6) road load vs. engine idle speed<br />

methods for testing passenger car defrosting<br />

systems, (7) light truck windshield defrosting<br />

systems, (8) a new road film solution for<br />

testing windshield washing system$, (9) a test<br />

to evaluate windshield clearing effectiveness,<br />

and (10) a headlamp washer test mixture and<br />

procedure. ln addition, NHTSA staff supports<br />

a FHWA program concerned with<br />

large truck splash, spray, and aerodynamic<br />

effects.<br />

3.<br />

Controls and Displays-Controls and displays<br />

are the means of communication between<br />

the driver and his vehicle for monitoring<br />

vehicle condition and operation. Any<br />

degradation or failure of the equipment<br />

poses a risk to safe operation. Recognition<br />

became easier through standardization of<br />

certain controls and displays in an amendment<br />

to FMVSS No. l0l.<br />

Work on a new $tandard that would regulate<br />

the speedometer and odometer was completed.<br />

Speedometer readings would be limited<br />

to 85 mph, and anti-tampering features<br />

of the odometer would be improved.


CHAPTER<br />

6<br />

STAN DARDS ENFORCEMENT AND<br />

DEFECTS INVESTIGATION<br />

Standards Enforcement Background<br />

The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety<br />

Act of 1966 ("the Act") places the responsibility<br />

for certification of motor vehicles or motor vehicle<br />

equipment on the manufacturcr or distributor.<br />

Any standard or regulation having the force of<br />

law must be backed up by enforcement in order to<br />

ensure compliance. NHTSA is authorized to conduct<br />

a testing program and inspections to enforce<br />

the motor vehicle standards.<br />

The purpose of standards enforcement is to establish<br />

a level of surveillance that will encourage<br />

manufacturers to exercise diligence in their quality<br />

control and manufacturing processes, thereby ensuring<br />

compliance. Each year all applicable standards<br />

are evaluated and priorities established for<br />

compliance testing. Among the things considered<br />

are the possible consequences of a failure, previous<br />

test experience, accident data, similarity of<br />

vehicles, consumer complaints, market penetration,<br />

and new vehicle design.<br />

Investigations are opened as a result of compliance<br />

test failure, visual inspection, consumer<br />

complaints, analysis of manufacturing data, congressional<br />

inquiries, and exarnination of manufacturers'<br />

voluntary recall campaigns relating to the<br />

standards.<br />

The Record<br />

During the past l0 years of compliance testing,<br />

2,511 investigations have been opened as a result<br />

of test failures and suspected noncompliance.<br />

Eighty-two percent of these investigations have<br />

been cornpleted, 423 investigation.s are still in<br />

process. During the past year, 303 investigations<br />

were initiated and 281 investigations were closed.<br />

Each month NHTSA issues a computerized<br />

'*Monthly<br />

Compliance Report." This practice has<br />

been in effect for over 7 years. The report provides<br />

consunrers as well as manufacturers with an account<br />

of NHTSA enforcement activities. A summary<br />

includes reports accepted, investigations initiated,<br />

investigations in progress, investigations<br />

closed, investigations released to the public, and<br />

also identifies the number of enforcement actions<br />

underway.<br />

Testing for compliance is done by independent<br />

testing laboratories under contract to NHTSA.<br />

Test results do not rcllect NHTSA's position on<br />

compliance. Favorable results should not be interpreted<br />

as necessarily establishing that the vehicle<br />

or item of equipment, a$ a class, is in conformity<br />

with the relevant FMVSS. Similarly, unfavorable<br />

test results should not be interpreted as having<br />

established nonconformances with FMVSS.<br />

Responsive tests, by definition, are those which<br />

are not part of the regular scheduled test program.<br />

During the past year these were included in the<br />

Report. They consist of accumulation of special<br />

tests responsive to consumer complaints, retests of<br />

items that have failed in the scheduled program,<br />

and tests of vehicle or equipment items which may<br />

be introduced late in a model year. Responsive<br />

testing related to FMVSS No. 109, Pneumatic<br />

Tnties, has been the largest testing category during<br />

the past two years.<br />

ln 1977,7,458 pieces of equipment were tested,<br />

and 172 vehicles were subjected to 225 tests.<br />

The testing program recognizes the continuing<br />

change in design characteristics of vehicles, as<br />

3t


Investigations<br />

Opened<br />

Closed<br />

Accumulated Total of<br />

Inve$tigations<br />

Opened<br />

Closed<br />

Table 8. Summary of Investlgatlons 1969-1977<br />

(Calendar Year)<br />

69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77<br />

149<br />

89<br />

149<br />

8S<br />

224<br />

69<br />

373<br />

158<br />

M2<br />

365<br />

815<br />

523<br />

337<br />

269<br />

1192<br />

792<br />

271<br />

229<br />

1463<br />

1061<br />

310<br />

331<br />

1773<br />

1352<br />

142<br />

310<br />

1S15<br />

1662<br />

Table 9. Number ol Civil Peneltles and Dollar Amounts<br />

(1968-1976)<br />

293<br />

209<br />

2208<br />

1871<br />

303<br />

281<br />

2511<br />

2152<br />

68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77<br />

Civil Penalties 0 3 7 15 26 47 45 21 20 14<br />

Dollars Ohousands) 0 90 124 194 176 193 230 138 94 17<br />

manufacturers strive to meet national priorities in<br />

the conservation of energy. Recognition is given to<br />

the fact that completely changed models currently<br />

being brought to market represent the manufacturers'<br />

efforts to reduce both size and weight. Test<br />

schedules are adjusted to include higher percentages<br />

of the totally new offerings to ascertain that<br />

they meet the requirements of the FMVSS (Figure<br />

20). During 1977 there was an increase in the number<br />

of test program vehicles that incorporated new<br />

structural design modifications such as shorter<br />

wheelbase, less overhang front and rear, lighter<br />

weight, more glass; interior design changes, and<br />

downgrading of power plants. It is expected that<br />

such changes will continue future model<br />

years.<br />

Upon test completion, vehicles are repaired and<br />

sold, traded in on new vehicles. donated to vocational<br />

trade schools, or transferred to other programs<br />

within the department. Vehicles subjected<br />

to the barrier crash or other destructive tests are<br />

sold for salvage. Funds from vehicle sales supplement<br />

test program expenditures.<br />

Uniform Tire Qunlity Grading<br />

Operations at the Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />

Test Center in San Angelo, Texas increased, both<br />

32<br />

in treadwear and in traction tests, Course monitoring<br />

tires (CMT's) of all three construction types<br />

(radial, bias, and bias belted) were released to the<br />

tire industry; this brought about greatly increased<br />

industry use of the test center.<br />

The CMT's were sold to ten tire manufacturers<br />

and four testing firms. During 1977, tests conducted<br />

on the San Angelo course by seven domestic<br />

tire firms, two foreign tire firms, and one testing<br />

company, involved some 224 test cars. ln addition,<br />

six companies have conducted traction tests<br />

on the concrete and asphalt skid surface, for a<br />

total of l2l test davs.<br />

Figure 20. Testing Program to Determine<br />

Crash Survivability


Course monitoring tests continued on the treadwear<br />

course. Monitoring tests on the traction<br />

surfaces used the NHTSA skid test system to ensure<br />

that the traction coefficient skid numbers remained<br />

within the prescribed limits for industry<br />

testing.<br />

The UTQG data management system at San<br />

Angelo now transmits treadwear and traction data<br />

to Wa$hington for comprehensive analysis.<br />

Surveillance of Imported Nonconforming<br />

Motor Vehicles<br />

The number of nonconforming foreign motor<br />

vehicles imported into the United States increased<br />

approximately l0 percent in 1977, as compared to<br />

1976, and resulted in a similar gain in preliminary<br />

investigations.<br />

During the year, there was increased refinement<br />

and utilization of the computerized system set up<br />

for initial processing, and continued monitoring,<br />

of cases established by preliminary investigation.<br />

This permitted a speedup in the disposition of<br />

cases through earlier recommendations to the<br />

Customs officials.<br />

Surveillance of commercial importers of nonconforming<br />

motor vehicles for resale continues. Technical<br />

personnel assigned to the NHTSA regional<br />

offices perform approximately 97 percent of the<br />

on-site inspections to verify that noncontbrming<br />

vehicles have been modified as stated in the importer's<br />

compliance statements. Over 50 percent<br />

of the vehicles tested have failed to meet one or<br />

more FMVSS.<br />

As a result of failure to conform, NHTSA recommended<br />

assessment of liquidated damages in over<br />

200 cases in 1977 , under the terms of the Customs<br />

entry declaration.<br />

There has been a sharp growth in the importation<br />

of small motor-driven two-wheeled vehicles, commonly<br />

called "mopeds" (Figure 2l). Over 80 foreign<br />

manufacturers are manufacturing these vehicles,<br />

and a large number are shipping them to the<br />

United States. Without exception, early production<br />

moped vehicles inspected from each new<br />

manufacturer have failed to conform to all of the<br />

applicable standards. Additionally, consumer information<br />

for these vehicles was either nonexistent<br />

or incorrect, and certification was<br />

improper.<br />

Defects Investigrtion Background<br />

The major objective of defects investigation is to<br />

influence vehicle and vehicle equipment manufacturers<br />

to build products increasingly free of safetyrelated<br />

defects, through enforcernent of Sections<br />

15l-160 of the Act.<br />

Nevertheless, motor vehicles and motor vehicle<br />

equipment are produced with safety-related<br />

defects. In those cases where the manufacturer reports<br />

such defects voluntarily, the recall procedures<br />

and corrective actions must be monitored.<br />

In cases where defects are reported by the public,<br />

Figure 21. Mopeds-A New Traffic<br />

Safety Problem<br />

33


NHTSA investigations are required to determine<br />

whether such defects are saf'ety-related.<br />

Congress recognized when passing the Act that it<br />

would be impractical to issue standards for all<br />

vehicle components that could cause accident$,<br />

deaths, or injuries if they failed. Therefore, safety<br />

defect investigations were authorized, and the<br />

manufacturer's responsibility to notiiy owners in<br />

the event a defect was determined to exist was<br />

clearly outlined. The Act also increases manuf'acturers'<br />

awareness of their responsibilities, and<br />

focuses public attention on safety-related defects.<br />

How the Job is Done<br />

To detect trends, information is analyzed from a<br />

variety of sources including vehicle owner letters,<br />

accident reports, consumer groups, manufacturer<br />

service bulletins, and research reports. If a trend<br />

develops, investigations are initiated to determine<br />

whether defects do or do not exist, through testing,<br />

field investigations, and surveys.<br />

Independent investigations are undertaken by<br />

NHTSA to identify safety defects unknown to, or<br />

overlooked by, vehicle and vehicle equipment<br />

manufacturers. Enforcement action is recommended<br />

when the manufacturer fails to take<br />

appropriate action on a safety defect problem. Investigations<br />

must develop the documented evidence<br />

for the expert testimony required in the<br />

event of enforcement litigation.<br />

Manufacturer service bulletins are analyzed and<br />

discussed with manufacturers to be sure that<br />

defects are not overlooked or classified as nonsaf'ety<br />

defects. The proposed cprrective action is<br />

analyzed to make sure it is adequate. Follow-up<br />

action is taken to ensure that the manufacturer's<br />

corrective action is implemented by the dealers.<br />

To enhance its capabilities in identifying and<br />

evaluating safety-related defects, NHTSA has:<br />

r Made permanent a nation-wide Auto Safety<br />

Hotline.<br />

r Disseminated the Hotline story to members<br />

of the Congress, the media, auto clubs, and others<br />

who are in contact with the motoring public.<br />

. Expanded its surveillance program covering<br />

manufacturers' warranty data, service bulletins,<br />

and recall campaigns.<br />

. Expanded the number of engineering evaluations<br />

from 32 in 1976 to 96 in 1977.<br />

34<br />

r Increased the number and scope of in-house<br />

tests.<br />

To ensure public awareness and encourage participation<br />

in the investigative process, public<br />

announcements are made coincident with the<br />

opening of each investigation. The manufacturer,<br />

the media, and consumer interest groups are inf<br />

ormed of the investigation, and are asked to add<br />

to the factual data bearing on the subject. A Consumer<br />

Protection tsulletin or Public Advisory is<br />

issued when an immediate risk to traffic safety<br />

becoures apparent.<br />

NHTSA utilizes contractor and automobile club<br />

resources in obtaining investigatory facts and statistics;<br />

this expands the data base and speeds up<br />

determinations of the existence of safety-related<br />

defects.<br />

NHTSA now receives about 36,000 reports a year<br />

from consumers. They are NHTSA's principal<br />

source of information. Each report is reviewed<br />

and made part of an automated consumer file.<br />

The data information system also is programmed<br />

with information concerning manufacturers' service<br />

bulletins, recall campaigns, previous investigations,<br />

and problems.<br />

The Hotline, in addition to opening a direct line of<br />

communication between the consumer and NHTSA,<br />

provides a means ol acquiring timely information<br />

relating to ongoing investigations and other safetyrelated<br />

vehicle problems. In its first year of operation.<br />

the Hotline received over 15.000 calls from<br />

the public (Figure 22). There werc requests for<br />

Figure 22. NHTSA Deputy Admlnlstrator<br />

Works Hie Shilt on the Hotline


information concerning DOT, NHTSA, vehicle<br />

standards, and the rulemaking process. Of greatest<br />

importance to the investigatory activity, nearly<br />

7,000 calls were received from consumers reporting<br />

vehicle safety problems.<br />

The number of Hotline calls averages 200 to 300<br />

per day. When a major recall is announced or<br />

when news of a new investigation is released, 500<br />

to 6O0 consumer calls will be received in a day.<br />

Information obtained from the Hotline calls that<br />

pertains to safety-related defects is entered into<br />

the data information file.<br />

NHTSA and the Recall Campaigns<br />

"Recall<br />

campaign" is the term given to action<br />

generally taken under the notification and remedy<br />

section of the Act concerning safety-related<br />

defects and noncompliance. Recall campaigns initiated<br />

by manufacturers, either voluntarily or by<br />

direction of NHTSA or the courts, are preceded<br />

by some form of investigation. An investigation<br />

may be undertaken by the manufacturer, or by<br />

NHTSA or, in some cases, by both.<br />

When a manufacturer determines that a defect<br />

that relates to motor vehicle safety or noncornpliance<br />

exists in a group of vehicles or items of equipment,<br />

the manufacturer is required to notify the<br />

vehicle owner, dealers, distributors, and NHTSA.<br />

Also, the manufacturer is required to remedy the<br />

problem at no charge to the vehicle owner.<br />

NHTSA is responsible for monitoring the manufacturer's<br />

corrective action for adequacy, and for<br />

compliance with statutory requirements.<br />

Reports that suggest the existence of significant<br />

safety defects in groups ofvehicles are investigated<br />

whether or not the component is the subject of a<br />

Federal Standard. Investigations encompass the<br />

production process from design, material, and<br />

manufacturing to quality control.<br />

If NHTSA's initial determination is that there is a<br />

safety defect or noncompliance, a letter is written<br />

to the manufacturer, informing him and stating<br />

the basis for the conclusions, and a notice is<br />

published in the Federal Register. The letter and<br />

notice give the time and place when a public meeting<br />

will be held so that the manufacturer and other<br />

interested parties may present their views. Statements<br />

made at this public proceeding are recorded.<br />

The information is then presented to the Administrator<br />

for final determination. lf there is an<br />

affirmative finding, a final letter is written to the<br />

manufacturer requiring that he notify all known<br />

owners, dealers, and distributors. Should the<br />

manufacturer refuse, the Administrator can go to<br />

the courts to compel him to take this action.<br />

The 1974 amendments to the Act give a vehicle<br />

owner the right to petition NHTSA for a public<br />

hearing, if a manufacturer has not corrected a<br />

safety problem without charge and within a reasonable<br />

time. Vehicle owner$ may also petition if<br />

they believe their Vehicles contain defects. The<br />

manufacturer must include information regarding<br />

complaint procedures and petitions in his recall<br />

letters to owners.<br />

Three of five petitions regarding recall campaign<br />

performance received by NHTSA during 1977<br />

have been resolved without resorting to hearing<br />

procedures. All campaign performance petitions<br />

have received responses within the 60-day period<br />

established by regulation.<br />

Thirteen petitions were received during 1977 from<br />

owners who believed their cars contained defects<br />

which also existed in a large number of similar<br />

vehicles. Of this group, one resulted in a defect<br />

notification campaign and another formed the<br />

basis for a formal defects investigation. To date,<br />

all responses have been made within the 120-day<br />

period established by statute.<br />

Publications concerning recall campaigns are<br />

available to the general public in several forms. A<br />

summary of each campaign is made public soon<br />

after it is received in NHTSA.<br />

A quarterly booklet summarizing the campaigns<br />

received each calendar quarter is printed and distributed<br />

by the Covernment Printing Office<br />

(CPO).'" Details for each campaign are available<br />

for reference in the Technical Reference Branch,<br />

NHTSA.<br />

In order to respond more quickly to the consum€r,<br />

and to provide more rapid turnaround for petitions<br />

and suggested investigations, NHTSA is acquiring<br />

a laboratory to perform metallurgical<br />

analyses of failed materials. This facility will aid<br />

in determining, upon receipt, whether or not a<br />

component or system contributes to safety-related<br />

defects. Equipment is also being acquired to permit<br />

chemical analyses of failed parts.<br />

{See Appendix D, No, 46.


As the year began, there were 49 cases being actively<br />

investigated. During the course of the year,<br />

25 new cases were opened and investigative action<br />

was completed on 54, leaving 20 cases under active<br />

investigation. Of these, l2 have been open for less<br />

than six months.<br />

Two important 197? cases were:<br />

r Engine Comparlment Fire: The recall of<br />

Porsches resulted from the discovery by a Safety<br />

Defects Investigator that dilute acid washed from<br />

the vehicle battery caused deterioration of the<br />

fabric wrapped around nearby fuel hoses. This<br />

resulted in loosening of the hoses, leakage of fuel<br />

and, finally, engine compartment fires. Following<br />

a NHTSA demonstration, the vehicle manufacturer<br />

announced a safety defect recall.<br />

t Flexibte Fan Breakage.' The Parts Return<br />

Program disclosed several broken flex fansn<br />

together with reports of cut hoses, fan shrouds,<br />

and radiators, but with no report$ of accidents or<br />

injuries. However, in January, word was received<br />

that a mechanic had received a cut arm from a<br />

broken blade. When inquiry to the vehicle manufacturer<br />

disclosed additional injuries, a formal investigation<br />

was opened and an NHTSA Consumer<br />

Advisory warned of the dangers involved in servicing<br />

engines equipped with flexible fans (Figure 23).<br />

The scope of the investigation was broadened to<br />

include other domestic manufacturers. A concerted<br />

effort resulted in the announcement of two<br />

defect notifications from Ford and one from<br />

American Motors Corporation.<br />

Safety Defect Recrlls-1977<br />

In 1977, there were 246 safety defect recall campaigns<br />

by vehicle manufacturers, involving a<br />

record 12.9 million (M) vehicles. Of these, 9.0M<br />

vehicles were recalled in campaigns influenced by<br />

NHTSA. Since inception of the Act (September<br />

1966 through December 1977) some 65.5M vehicles<br />

have been recalled in 2,396 campaigns; 10.4M<br />

vehicles and 451 campaigns involved foreign vehicles.<br />

Of these campaigns, 363, involving 34.4M<br />

vehicles, were influenced by NHTSA.<br />

Safety Cnmpaign Audits<br />

Part of the intent of the Act is to ensure that<br />

manufacturers produce vehicles and equipment as<br />

36<br />

free of defects as is technologically possible. When<br />

safety problems do occur, it is necessary to make<br />

sure that the manufacturers notify both NHTSA<br />

and the vehicle owner. However, the success of<br />

any recall campaign lies in the adequacy of corrective<br />

measures, and the extent to which the vehicle<br />

population is covered.<br />

Points considered by NHTSA in evaluating adequacy<br />

of a campaign<br />

are:<br />

r Does the corrective action eliminate the safety<br />

problem?<br />

r Is the timing as to the availability of replacement<br />

parts reasonable?<br />

r Does the letter to the owner realistically<br />

describe the saf'ety problem and the corrective<br />

action?<br />

r ls the recall campaign broad enough to encompass<br />

all potentially defective vehicles?<br />

r Are any other manufacturers using the same<br />

component with the same safety problem?<br />

NHTSA receives a copy of the letter which the<br />

manufacturer sends to the owners, Contents of the<br />

letter are prescribed by regulation.<br />

NHTSA has a follow-up program to ensufe that as<br />

many vehicles as possible are corrected. Each<br />

manufacturer is required to submit a quarterly<br />

report on campaign progress. When the completion<br />

rate is less than normal. the manufacturer<br />

may be requested to take additional action.


Teble 10. $ummary of Salety Recall Campaigns<br />

Defect Campaigns<br />

Vehicles Hecalled<br />

ffhousands)<br />

Year Dome$tic Foreign Domestic Foreign<br />

1969<br />

1970<br />

1971<br />

1972<br />

1973<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

138<br />

100<br />

182<br />

277<br />

208<br />

208<br />

190<br />

169<br />

195<br />

42<br />

54<br />

53<br />

43<br />

43<br />

39<br />

27<br />

40<br />

51<br />

7,502<br />

738<br />

8,790<br />

7,814<br />

6,667<br />

2,338<br />

1,931<br />

2,944<br />

10,690<br />

The NHTSA audit progam is designed to ensure<br />

that vehicles having possible safety problems are<br />

identified and repaired, and to test the adequacy<br />

of the repairs. This is done on a sampling basis<br />

through contact with vehicle owners to establish<br />

whether:<br />

r A notification was received.<br />

r The owner responded.<br />

r The vehicle was repaired.<br />

As an extension of the audit, certain vehicles are<br />

examined to establish thatr<br />

r The repairs were made as claimed.<br />

r The repairs were adequate and effective'<br />

Parts Return Program<br />

The Parts Return Frogram involves voluntary<br />

submittal of information by independent repair<br />

shops, along with any failed automotive components<br />

encountered during daily business. The purpose<br />

of the program is to help NHTSA identify<br />

potential safety defects in motor vehicles and<br />

motor vehicle equipment (Figure 24).<br />

During the 1977 calendar year, 249 participating<br />

shops provided 1,4O8 components and items of information,<br />

a 49 percent increase from the previous<br />

year.<br />

The components and information received during<br />

this sixth year of program operation provided support<br />

to 17 formal investigations and to numerous<br />

engineering analyses. Two of the investigations<br />

resulted in the recall of certain failure-prone flexible<br />

blade engine cooling fans made by Ford<br />

416<br />

502<br />

630<br />

4,263<br />

334<br />

531<br />

280<br />

451<br />

2,227<br />

Safety Recall Campaigns<br />

Directly Influenced<br />

by NHTSA (Accumulative<br />

Percentage Since 1966)<br />

4.4<br />

5.3<br />

9.7<br />

14.9<br />

14.3<br />

14.9<br />

14.3<br />

14.4<br />

15.1<br />

Motor Company, and some Firestone steel belted<br />

tires which failed to comply with FMVSS No. 109.<br />

The program is being expanded to include new car<br />

dealers, automotive parts supplier$, and passenger<br />

vehicle fleet operators. This will broaden the base<br />

of parts and information to include late model<br />

vehicles.<br />

:' Recrefltional Yehicle Surveys<br />

Two NHTSA surveys of recreational vehicles, four<br />

years apart, were carried out to obtain data on


loading and suspensions. As a result of the overloaded<br />

conditions revealed in the original survey,<br />

two regulations and one FMVSS have been issued,<br />

These require manufacturers to provide users with<br />

information on loading, gross weight, and center<br />

of gravity.<br />

The second roadside survey showed a 26 percent<br />

decline in travel trailers found overloaded, and a<br />

35 percent decline in overloaded motor homes.<br />

Engineering Test Facility<br />

1977 was the startup year for the Engineering Test<br />

Facility located at the Transportation Research<br />

Center of Ohio. Testing began in September 1976.<br />

Leased building space of 32,500 square feet (Figure<br />

25) was occupied in December 1976. By May<br />

1977, four testing projects had been completed<br />

Flgure 25. Engin€ering Test Facility<br />

and the workload increased rapidly. By the end of<br />

the year, 24 projects had been received and 16 had<br />

been completed.<br />

The operation at ETF has confirmed the benefits<br />

of quick-reaction testing by an in-house facility.<br />

Testing in 1977 made use of the major driving surfaces<br />

available at the TRC-the 7.5 mile, highspeed<br />

oval track, the SO-acre vehicle dynamics<br />

area, and the 2,500-foot skid pad. ETF test projects<br />

also utilized the TRC high-acceleration crash<br />

simulator.<br />

Most of the testing performed by ETF during 1977<br />

was in support of NHTSA safety defect investigations.<br />

The purpose of one test project completed<br />

during 1977, however, was to validate a proposed<br />

new test procedure for Standard No. 213, Child<br />

Restraint Sy.rlerns. As future schedules permit,<br />

ETF will carry oul some compliance testing.


CHAPTER 7<br />

AUTOMOTIVE FUEL ECONOMY<br />

Sumnrary of Funclions and<br />

Interagency Relations<br />

The Secretary of Transportation is charged with<br />

the administration of Title V: Improving Automotive<br />

Efficiency of the Motor Vehicle lnformation<br />

and Cost Savings Act, as amended by the Energy<br />

Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. This responsibility<br />

has been delegated to NHTSA. The<br />

obligations include:<br />

r Promulgation of average passenger automobile<br />

fuel economy standards along the guidelines<br />

established by the Congress in the Act.<br />

r Establishment of average fuel economy<br />

standards for vans and light trucks under 10,000<br />

pounds GVWR.<br />

. Issuance of regulations governing proctdures,<br />

definitions, and rcports to sufrport the<br />

standards.<br />

r Enforcement of the standards.<br />

Proposed and final rules for automotive fuel<br />

economy, directed by the Secretary of Transportation,<br />

are coordinated with the Department of<br />

Energy. In addition such rulemaking is coordinated<br />

with other agencies of the governrnent when<br />

necessary.<br />

Standards Issued and Proposed<br />

The Congress legislated average passenger car fuel<br />

economy standards for MY 1978, 1979, and 1980,<br />

at 18, 19, and 20 miles per gallon (mpg), respectively,<br />

and directed that the Secretary issue standards<br />

for MY l98t through 1984, leading to a goal<br />

of 27 .5 mpg by MY 1985. The Secretary is directed<br />

to consider technological feasibility, economic<br />

practicality, and the effects of motor vehicle<br />

safety standards.<br />

The standards which haye been established and the<br />

anticipated results are:*<br />

. For passenger automobiles the averages are<br />

set at 22,24,26, and 27 mpg for MY 1981, 1982,<br />

1983, and 1984. These fleet averages are deemed<br />

to be within the capability of the manufacturing<br />

industry to meet with ease. lt is anticipated that<br />

the standards will result in savings of 590,000 barrels<br />

of fuel per day by 1985 and I.2 million barrels<br />

per day in 1995 over the 1980 average of 20 mpg.<br />

This amounts to the amazing cumulative saving of<br />

4.3 billion barrels by 1995, equal to half ol' the<br />

estimated oil reserves in Alaska.<br />

r The economic effects on the consumer will<br />

also be beneficial. While price increases due to<br />

fuel economy measures may rise at the rate of<br />

about $49 per year for the 4-year period l98l<br />

through 1984, for a total price increase of about<br />

$200, savings will exceed $640 over the life of an<br />

automobile, based on a price of 650 per gallon for<br />

gasoline. The net saving to the consumer, including<br />

increases in purchase price and maintenance<br />

costs, will be about $490.<br />

r Fuel economy standards for nonpassenger<br />

vehicles (vans and light trucks) are 17.2 mpg for<br />

MY 1979 two-wheel drive vehicles, and 15.8 mpg<br />

for MY 1979 four-wheel drive general utility vehicles<br />

weighing less than 6,000 pounds. These standards,<br />

also, were set with a view to the technological<br />

state-of-the-art, and the economic consequences.<br />

Fuel savings will amount to 6,684 barrels per day<br />

under the 1979 rules. or a total of 24.4 million barrels<br />

during the lifetime of the fleet.<br />

rFor a more complete treatment of the rulemaking process, the<br />

research and rationale bchind it, and the anticipated results,<br />

see Automotive Fuel Etonomy Pragram, Sercntl Annual<br />

Reltort trt the Congrcss, .lanuary l97tl, available from Ceneral<br />

Services Division/Distrihution. NHTSA,<br />

39


It is estimated that the fuel economy standard<br />

for MY 1979 vans and light trucks could impose<br />

an additional cost to the consumer of as much as<br />

$22 per vehicle. This would be more than offset by<br />

a lifetime operating cost saving of approximately<br />

$68 per year, or about $415 (discounted for inflation)<br />

during the life of the vehicle.<br />

r In addition, the final rule establishing average<br />

fuel economy standards for vans and light trucks<br />

for MY 1980 and l98l is to be issued in March<br />

1978.*<br />

Regulntlons and Compllance<br />

Regulations have been published which cover definitions,<br />

procedures, and reports required of the<br />

manufacturers to support the standards, and petitions<br />

for granting exemptions from the standards.<br />

As required by law, a Cas Mileage Guide was<br />

prepared and distributed to dealers by the Federal<br />

Energy Adrninistration (FEA), based on measurements<br />

made by the EPA. It is the responsibility of<br />

NHTSA to enforce regulations regarding display<br />

of the Guide by new automobile dealers. A nationwide<br />

survey of more than 200 dealers found that<br />

some 60 percent were not prominently displaying<br />

the Cuide. Letters have been sent to 26,fi)0 dealers<br />

informing them of their obligation. If the mailing<br />

fails to have the desired results, further enforcement<br />

measures are planned.<br />

Fuel F.conomy Reseflrch<br />

ln 1977, NHTSA continued the fuel economy research<br />

program, to provide the data and analysis<br />

to fulfill its responsibilities. This research program<br />

was separated into five categories;<br />

. Assessment of Automotive Technology-The<br />

evaluation of production and future hardware<br />

*MY 1980 standard was set at 16 mpg for two-wheel drive and<br />

14 mpg for four-whccl drive vehicles. MY l98l standard was<br />

set at l8 mpg for two-wheel drive and 15.5 mpg for fourwheel<br />

drive vehicles.<br />

40<br />

available to manufacturers to achieve fuel economy<br />

improvements on passenger automobiles,<br />

and on vans and light trucks of less than 10,000<br />

pounds GVWR (individually and in fleets). lmprovements<br />

include weight and performance<br />

reductions, engine and drive train improvements,<br />

alternative engines and transmissions, improved<br />

lubricants, reduced aerodynamic drag, and rolling<br />

resistance.<br />

. Effects of Other Federal Standurds on Fuel<br />

Economy-The interactions between the requirements<br />

for fuel economy, emission, noise, safety<br />

and damageability standards, as well as the effects<br />

of other Federal standards (occupational safety,<br />

health, and environmental) on manufacturing<br />

plants and production capabilities.<br />

t Industrial Analysis-The evaluation of production<br />

problems and costs of technological improvements<br />

(individually and in combinations),<br />

the assessment of manufacturers' capabilities and<br />

leadtimes in implementing fuel economy improvements,<br />

capital requirements and the feasibility of<br />

obtaining capital, the evaluation of each manufacturer's<br />

ability to meet the standard$, and assessment<br />

of the impact upon the labor force.<br />

t Economic Analyses^The effects of fuel<br />

economy standards (and/or other conservation<br />

actions) on automobile prices and demand, on<br />

employment, and on cost of ownership and operation<br />

of automobiles. This category also deals with<br />

domestic competition, consumer choices, imports,<br />

air quality, highway safety, and aggregate economic<br />

effects on the automobile industry, the national<br />

economy, and petroleum and other national<br />

resources. Underscoring these considerations are<br />

the availability and price of fuel.<br />

t Market Analyses-The interactions between<br />

automobile products offered and the acceptance<br />

they receive in the marketplace, in view of fuel<br />

economy standards, government policies, and fuel<br />

prices.<br />

The major accomplishments of this program during<br />

1977 are shown in Table I I.


Table 11. 1977 Fuel Economy Stendads and Rogulatlons<br />

Date lssued Type<br />

Average Fuel Economy Standards for Nonpassenger Automoblles 318177 New Standard<br />

Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards 6127177 New $tandard<br />

Vehicle Classification 7128177 Definitional<br />

Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles 712U77 Definitional<br />

Reduction of Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy<br />

Standards (1) Procedural -<br />

ExemptionfromAverageFue|EconomyStandards7l2w77Procedu<br />

Automotive Fuel Economy Heports (2) Procedural<br />

(1) Published 11114177<br />

(2) Published 12l1WT<br />

Title<br />

A<br />

- 4<br />

*r<br />

"i


CHAPTER 8<br />

LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE<br />

ENFORCEMENT<br />

Litigation Highlights, lg77<br />

B. F. Goodrich v. DOT. On March 21, 1977, the<br />

Supreme Court denied the request of eight tire<br />

manufacturers to review the September 2, 1976<br />

decision of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals<br />

upholding the principal provisions of the Uniform<br />

Tire Quality Grading Standards.<br />

General Motors Corporation v. Brinegar; United<br />

S/a/es v. General Motors Corporalion (Circuit<br />

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia). In<br />

october 1977, the circuit court upheld the validity<br />

of an NHTSA order that General Motors<br />

notify owners of a defect in the fuel inlet plugs installed<br />

in some 274,0001965-1966 Chevrolets and<br />

Buicks. Plug failure could result in fire.<br />

Admtnlstrfl tive Enforeement<br />

The following administrative enforcement actions<br />

were settled by accepting payments in lieu of seeking<br />

civil penalties through Court actions:<br />

r For nonconformance with vehicle lighting<br />

requirements (Standard No. 108):<br />

Easy Trail, Inc. $1,fi)0<br />

Cobra Custom Trailers I,mO<br />

Eastside Machine, Inc. 1,000<br />

Panrher Westwinds Ltd. 1,500<br />

r For nonconformance with the passenger car<br />

retreaded tire requirements (Standard No. ll7):<br />

MFA Oil Inc. $ 750<br />

Rising Bros. 250<br />

Phillips and Anderson 750<br />

r For nonconformance with motorcycle controls<br />

and displays requirements (Standard No,<br />

123):<br />

Cimatti Ltd. $1,500<br />

r For nonconformance with child $eating systems<br />

requirements (Standard No. 213)r<br />

tsabyhood Industries $ 500<br />

Pride-Trimble Corp. 500<br />

Questor Juvenile Proclucts 5,0fi1<br />

r For nonconformance with bus window retention<br />

and emergency exit requirements (Standard<br />

No. 217):<br />

Eagle lnternational lnc.<br />

Blue Bird Body Company<br />

Carpenter Body Works<br />

$1,500<br />

500<br />

l,(x)0<br />

At the end of 1977. six settlement letters had been<br />

sent to vehicle and equipment manufacturers to<br />

inform them that, unless an acceptable offer in<br />

compromise is received, civil penalties will be pursued.<br />

Two additional settlement letters, informing<br />

vehicle manufacturers that NHTSA would be willing<br />

to close its files without penalty providing<br />

acceptable notification and remedy campaigns are<br />

conducted, also were outstanding.


CHAPTER 9<br />

SPECIAL PROGRAMS<br />

International Cooperation<br />

Recognizing the universal growth in the industrialized<br />

countries of traffic injuries and fatalities, and<br />

related problems such as drunk drivers, fuel consumption,<br />

and emissions, NHTSA has been involved<br />

in a number of international activities and<br />

organizations. Although the U.S. has by tar the<br />

Iargest road network, driver,/automobile population,<br />

and background experience, international<br />

cooperation and information exchange in automobile<br />

and traffic safety continues to be mutually<br />

beneficial and productive for all participants.<br />

provides for the development of motor vehicle<br />

construction standards, including safety requirements.<br />

To date, a total of 36 regulations have been<br />

developed and attached to the 1958 Geneva Agreement.<br />

These represent one of two main sources of<br />

safety standards for the construction of motor<br />

vehicles in the world. The second source is the set<br />

of FMVSS developed by NHTSA. Many countries,<br />

including Japan, Canada, and Australia,<br />

have used NHTSA and the WP29 standards in the<br />

development of their own regulations. The EEC<br />

(Common Market) is also developing a set of<br />

directives derived from the WP29 standards.<br />

NHTSA's international efforts in 1977 included As yet, adequate harmonization between NHTSA<br />

visits and cooperation with numerous representa- standards and corresponding WP29 standards has<br />

tives of foreign Governments as well as their auto- not been achieved; a few are similar but many are<br />

mobile/traffic safety-related agencies and manu- substantially different. NHTSA is working with<br />

facturers. The primary international organizations WP29 to improve the situation, and is represented<br />

with which NHTSA has been active are; NATO's on six of the eight groups of rapporteurs that<br />

Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society develop technical drafts for WP29. With U.S.<br />

(CCMS), the Road Safety Committee of the Euro- support, WP29 has reorganized the groups of rappean<br />

Conference of Ministers of Transport porteurs to more closely parallel NHTSA's organi-<br />

(ECMT), Committee lnternational de I'Inspection zation for the development of FMVSS. A special<br />

Technique Automobile (CITA), Organization for WP29 ad hoc Group for Harmonization of<br />

Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), NHTSA and WP29 Standards has been estab-<br />

European Economic Community (EEC), Interlished. The expected international laboratory test<br />

national Standards Organization (ISO), United procedures from this group will be issued as an<br />

Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE),<br />

European Experimental Vehicle Committee<br />

ECE document.<br />

(EEVC), and Japan's Ministry of International International Standards Organization<br />

Trade and Industry (MITI).<br />

International Automobile Safety Slandsrds<br />

Harmonization<br />

Many ISO test procedures are incorporated into<br />

WP29 regulations, just as many Society of Automotive<br />

Engineer (SAE) test procedures are incorporated<br />

into NHTSA regulations. NHTSA partici-<br />

The U.S. (NHTSA) participates as a voting mempates in the ISO through Technical Committee 22<br />

ber at meetings of the Group of Experts on the on the construction of automobiles, and in the<br />

Construction of Vehicles (Working Party 29), human impact testing and evaluations of Tech-<br />

Inland Transport Committee of the ECE. WP29 nical Committee 108 on mechanical vibration and<br />

operates under the 1958 Geneva Agreement, which shock. This is another means of harmonizing test<br />

4E<br />

, r<br />

I


procedures which may be incorporated into future<br />

international safety standards.<br />

The International Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />

Program<br />

The lnternational ESV Program, initiated by the<br />

CCMS Road Safety Pilot Study, is led by the<br />

United States through the NHTSA Research<br />

Safety Vehicle Program.* Research data is exchanged<br />

among governmenl and industry representatives<br />

under Memoranda of Understanding<br />

between the U.S. Government and the governments<br />

of France, Great Britain, the Federal Republic of<br />

Germany, Japan, Sweden, and Italy. In 1977,<br />

research publications included the Report on the<br />

Sixth International Conference on Experimental<br />

Vehicles,+* which contains proceedings of the<br />

October 1976 Washington, D.C., conference and<br />

test reports on U.S. crash tests of the Renault<br />

Basic Research Vehicle and the British Leyland<br />

Marina Research Safety Vehicle (Figure 26).<br />

Communications with Japan continue through the<br />

Ministry of lnternational Trade and Industry. The<br />

European Experimental Vehicles Committee coordinates<br />

car safety technical activities of European<br />

participants in the international program.<br />

In November 1977, the NHTSA Administrator<br />

attended an EEVC meeting in London for the<br />

purpo$e of planning future ESV conferences, experimental<br />

vehicle activities, and research data<br />

exchanges. The next ESV conference is tentatively<br />

scheduled for Paris in 1979.<br />

Blomechanics and Anthropomorphic Test<br />

Dummies<br />

International Head-Neck lnjury Workshops held<br />

in Washington, D.C. and Ann Arbor, Michigan<br />

during 1977 were sponsored by NHTSA. Participants<br />

included medical and engineering research<br />

representatives from the U.S., England, France,<br />

Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland. In process,<br />

as the result of these workshops, are standardized<br />

procedures for head-neck autopsy, injury identification<br />

with appropriate computer-oriented<br />

coding, and arrangements for storage of, and<br />

+See Crash Survivability, IntegratedVehicle<br />

Systems Programs.<br />

'rSee Appendix D, No, 11,<br />

46<br />

;l<br />

. t,t:l<br />

Figure 26, British Leyland Marina RSV<br />

common access<br />

to, brain injury data from cooperating<br />

research hospitals in this country and<br />

abroad.<br />

NHTSA participated in the EEVC Biomechanics<br />

Working Croupn the International Research com*<br />

mittee on Biokinetics (IRCOBI), and the ISO<br />

meeting held in Berlin and Vienna during September<br />

1977 . Arrangements were made to assist European<br />

biomedical researchers in coordinating<br />

instrumentation protocol, using uniform coordinate<br />

systems, standardizing methods of injury<br />

identification and reporting, and adopting comr<br />

mon injury coding procedures for injury data<br />

banks.<br />

NHTSA personnel engaged in the organization<br />

and work of the Fifth International Workshop of<br />

Human Subjects for Biomechanical Research,<br />

held in November 1977 in New Orleans. Representatives<br />

from seven countries participated. For<br />

the past five years these workshops have been<br />

directed at developing uniform procedures for the<br />

use of humans and animals as test subjects, to generate<br />

information on human tolerance to crash<br />

injury.<br />

Support of the l)epartments of Stnte and<br />

Cornmerce Bila teral Government Consultations<br />

with Japan<br />

NHTSA provides technical support to the U.S.<br />

delegation participating in bilateral consultations<br />

with the Government of Japan on automobile<br />

safety standards and certification procedures.<br />

'fhe<br />

consultations held in Tokyo during September<br />

1977 improved the mutual understanding of the<br />

entry procedures for vehicles of U.S. manufacture<br />

into the Japanese market.


Handicapped Drivers<br />

In November 1977, NHTSA sent a representative<br />

to the Department of Commerce-sponsored<br />

"Rehabilitation<br />

USA" seminar in Tokyo, Japan,<br />

to present a paper describing NHTSA research<br />

and development programs related to handicapped<br />

drivers and rulemaking actions planned for<br />

drivers' adaptive controls.<br />

U.S.-Canadian Test Facility Coordination<br />

Coordination with Canadian counterparts in the<br />

Ministry of Transport on design of facilities for<br />

testing motor vehicles and equipment continued<br />

during 1977. Plans, specifications, and equipment<br />

lists for the NHTSA Compliance Test Facility<br />

have been released for use by the Canadian Ministry<br />

ol Transport and its contractors for their<br />

Motor Vehicle Test Center. Representatives of the<br />

Canadian architect-engineer firm visited the Engineering<br />

Test Facility in East Liberty, Ohio, for<br />

discussion of NHTSA's current and projected instrumentation<br />

capability.<br />

No-Damage Bumper System<br />

Proposals to delay tougher requirements in the<br />

federal standard on passenger car bumpers have<br />

been withdrawn in line with comments presented<br />

at a public hearing in July, which showed that a<br />

delay in the effective date was not justified.<br />

The primary goal of the bumper standard, which<br />

was mandated by Congress in the Motor Vehicle<br />

Information and Cost Saving.s Act, is to reduce<br />

the cost of low-speed collisions.+ It incorporates<br />

the requirement$ currently contained in Standard<br />

No. 215 which, since MY 1974, has required passenger<br />

car bumpers to withstand crashes of 5 miles<br />

per hour, both front and rear, without damage to<br />

safety systems such as lighting, fuel, exhaust,<br />

braking, steering, cooling, and latching.<br />

The new standard not only prohibits damage to<br />

safety systems, but also to all vehicle surfaces<br />

except for the bumper, in 5-mph front and rearend<br />

crashes, beginning with cars manufactured in<br />

the 1979 model year. The second-phase requirements<br />

of the standard, scheduled to take effect in<br />

MY 1980, limit damage to the bumper face bar to<br />

*For information on bumper work, other than "no-damage",<br />

sec scctions on Pedestrian Protection and lnteerated Vehicle<br />

Svstems,<br />

%-inch dents, and lirnit overall flattening of the<br />

bumper<br />

face bar to %-inch.<br />

Information submitted by the automobile manufacturers<br />

indicates that consumers will have to pay<br />

about $6 to $ l0 more, on the average, for a vehicle<br />

equippcd with Phase II bumpers than for a vehicle<br />

with Phase I bumpers. This cost increase is expected<br />

to be far outweighed by the benefits of the<br />

more damage-resistant bumper systems.<br />

Electric and Hybrid Vehicles SummsrT<br />

The Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development,<br />

and Demonstration Act of 1976 (Public<br />

Law 94-413) reflected a determination lry Congress<br />

that the introduction of electric and hybrid vehicles<br />

would be practical, would substantially reduce<br />

domestic use of petroleum and, would in turn,<br />

decrease dependence on foreign sources of oil. In<br />

response to the legislative requirements, NHTSA<br />

activities included the following in 1977:<br />

r Completed a study+ of current and future<br />

applicability of safety standards and regulations<br />

to these vehicles, which concluded that most existing<br />

standards will be applicable, with certain modifications.<br />

. Analyzed available test data on electric and<br />

hybrid vehicles (crash and performance tests) visa-vis<br />

data on internal combustion engine vehicles.<br />

Additional crash tests were planned, as well as<br />

demonstration fleets, to obtain data necessary for<br />

future requirements.<br />

. Held a public hearing to obtain the views of<br />

all interested parties.<br />

r Made recommendations to develop standards<br />

to deal with unique hazards of these vehicles and<br />

provide a level oI safety consistent with that anticipated<br />

for other vehicles.<br />

r Reported to the Congress and the Energy<br />

Research and Development Administration on the<br />

results of the study.<br />

Odometer Tampering<br />

The odometer tampering program is going through<br />

a trial pcriod to assess the ultimate levels of enlbrcement<br />

that will be needed. The initial NHTSA<br />

*Availablc from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA, 400 7th<br />

Street, S.w,, Washington, D.C. 20590.<br />

47


effort has concentrated on helping consumers make odometer tampering more difficult.<br />

pursue their rights of action and in assisting law<br />

enforcement agencies through advice and refer- The Department of Justice has participated in or<br />

' I<br />

rals. The Washington Office has processed over coordinated Federal investigation of approxi-<br />

2fi) odometer complaints. Some have been referred<br />

to other enforcement agencies, and others<br />

mately 50 automobile dealerships and wholesalers.<br />

ln Minnesota, five defendants pled guilty and l<br />

have been followed up through inquiries to State have received short prison sentences. In New Jer- I<br />

recorcls or warning letters to individuals suspected sey, fines and civil restitution have been imposed i<br />

ofsellingvehicleswithalteredodometers.TheonatleaStsevendefendants.lnKentu<br />

regions also have handlecl numerous complaints. defendants pled guilty, paid substantial fines, and I<br />

A vehicle standard has been proposed that would served time in prison.<br />

48


CHAPTER<br />

1O<br />

THE CONSUMER'S<br />

ADVOCATE<br />

Informing the Press and the Public<br />

There were many requests for interviews with<br />

NHTSA officials from the daily, weekly, trade,<br />

and international press as well as from radio and<br />

television news reporters and analysts. These interviews<br />

and countless inquiries by telephone and in<br />

person resulted in special articles, and radio and<br />

television news spots throughout the country.<br />

Two-minute, ll-minute, and lS-minute films on<br />

air bags were widely distributed and used. Spot<br />

announcements also were prepared and distrib-<br />

uted on such subjects as alcohol and driving,<br />

motorcycle and bicycle safety, and the 55-mph<br />

national speed limit.<br />

Serving the Consumer<br />

NHTSA services include assisting the consumer in<br />

the resolution of vehicle and vehicle equipment<br />

safety problems, keeping the consumer informed<br />

of automotive safety problems, and furnishing in-<br />

formational materials on all aspects of motor<br />

vehicle safety.<br />

The public's growing interest in the safety and<br />

econorny of automotive transportatiOn was evi- The Auto Safety Hotline was made a permanent<br />

denced by the demand for information, reports of facility and its services publicized. By year's end<br />

defects, and response to demonstration projects this national, toll-free service was handling 300 to<br />

and publicity campaigns. NHTSA issued some 123 500 inquiries daily. The sready flow of safety-<br />

news releases, dealing with various aspects of related data received by NHTSA through Hotline<br />

NHTSA operations, including standards, regula- inquiries is of great value in the defects investigations,<br />

compliance activities, motor vehicle accition function, and in the recall of vehicles and<br />

dent costs of $43 billion annually, use of State equipment for correction of dangerous problems.<br />

highway safety funds to promote the use of Citi- On the other hand, the public receives NHTSA<br />

zens' Band (CB) radios for highway emergencies, expertise in resolving vehicle problems, or prompt<br />

incentive grants to States for reducing their high- referral to the proper jurisdiction to handle inquirway<br />

fatalities and fatality rates, and technical ies outside the purview of this agency.<br />

assistance to the States to improve their 55-mph<br />

enforcement programs. A monthly<br />

These news releases received<br />

wide coverage in U.S. newspapers, magazines,<br />

and trade publications.<br />

"Consumer Report Package" was instituted,<br />

to assist consumer groups and agencies<br />

throughout the counrry in handling vehicle problems<br />

that plague the consumer, and to answer the<br />

need for motor vehicle safety information. The<br />

packages, mailed to some 230 consumer agencies<br />

(Federal, State, local, and private), contain news<br />

releases on new vehicle defect investigation recalls<br />

and on tire and equipment recalls.<br />

A new service to the consumer is the publication<br />

of "Consumer Advisories", in the form of press<br />

releases, to get the information on safety problems<br />

to the motoring public as quickly as possible. ln<br />

addition to information on investigations and<br />

recalls, the releases solicit reports from consumers<br />

on problems such as those being investigated and,<br />

whenever possible, furnish advice on precautions<br />

to be observed pending correction. Forty-three<br />

such advisories were issued during 1977.<br />

In addition to the Hotline, 600-700 complaints<br />

and inquiries from the public are handled monthly.<br />

All are responded to, and the complaints made<br />

known to the manufacturers.<br />

49


50<br />

Flgure 27- Sate Driving ln Winter<br />

A new Fact Sheet on Brake Fluids* was published<br />

during the reporting period as well as a booklet on<br />

Safe Driving in Winter+, and Spanish language<br />

versions of Tips on Car Care and Safety for DeuJ<br />

Drivers* (Figures 2? and 28).<br />

, HL CUIDADO Y LA<br />

1;1iii,,, 'i''"' $EGURIDAD DEL<br />

., AUTOMOVIL<br />

Figure 28. Tips on Car Care and Safety for Deal<br />

Drivers-SPanish Version<br />

+Available on request from General Services Dvision,<br />

NHTSA. 4fi) 7th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590.


CHAPTER 11<br />

RESEARCH AND HOW IT IS USED<br />

The purpose of the research program is to develop<br />

a data base that will support the motor vehicle and<br />

highway safety programs of the National Highway<br />

Traffic Safety Administration in its campaign to<br />

save lives and reduce injuries on our Nation's<br />

streets and highways. Research is planned and carried<br />

out to discover trends, to pinpoint problems,<br />

and to provide solutions. A major effort is currently<br />

underway to help the automotive industry<br />

design and produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.<br />

while still maintaining vehicle safery and integrity.<br />

Tables 12 and 13 list examples of NHTSA and<br />

FHWA research projects and describe how they<br />

have been, or may be, applied.<br />

Analysis, Evnluation, and Dissemination<br />

of Research<br />

The utilization of research and development to<br />

solve highway safety problems may be illustrated<br />

by outlining an ideal sequence of steps. Occasionally,<br />

unusual events in the traffic and highway<br />

safety situation require a reordering or combining<br />

of the phases. Ideally, the activities should flow as<br />

follows:<br />

t Problem Awareness-Research data cari trigger<br />

an alert to a new or growing problem and<br />

determine whether a real problem exists.<br />

t FocusinE on the Solution-Once the problem<br />

is understood, research focuses on discovering<br />

promising solutions-making sure of the alternatives<br />

for breaking the causal chain of events leading<br />

to the accident, reducing the impacr of the<br />

crash, or eliminating the situation in which the<br />

accident takes place.<br />

r Testinq the Solution-After finding that a<br />

particular safety I'eature or solution is feasible and<br />

appears practical, development and testing is<br />

needed to prove the effectiveness of the countermeasure<br />

and how it should be instituted. The<br />

result is a complete package that can be provided<br />

to States and communities for use, or form the<br />

basis for a new or amended safety standard.<br />

t Determination of Effictiveness of Existing<br />

Programs-Programs are utilized in real situations<br />

and the data from these programs are made available<br />

to practitioners and researchers. Specific<br />

applications in a number of aspects of highway<br />

safety are described in the accompanying tables.<br />

Table 13 is devoted to NHTSA data acquisition<br />

and statistical functions.<br />

Current Research Grants and Contracts<br />

and the Problems They Address<br />

Appendix E contains a list of research contract$<br />

which were active during calendar year 1977.<br />

NHTSA policy favors competitive procurement<br />

rather than the use of grants. The bulk of the<br />

research is performed by private industry and<br />

universities instead of by government employees.<br />

Research is carried out primarily to develop data<br />

to support near-term and future standards.<br />

NHTSA and FHWA continue to allocate a significant<br />

portion of their research to priority programs.<br />

NHTSA priorities now include increased<br />

emphasis on motorcycle, moped, and pedestrian<br />

safety; emphasis on fundamental approaches to<br />

reducing alcohol and drug-related accidents;<br />

research to develop the technical support for fuel<br />

economy standards; research to support passive<br />

restraint standards; the integrated vehicle systems<br />

program to design, develop, construct, and test<br />

research vehicles embodying advanced tcchnological<br />

features; and the initial portion of the<br />

NASS by the National Center for Statistics and<br />

Analysis.<br />

51<br />

.J,


Table 72. 1977 Research Accompllshments and Application to Motor Vehicle Standards<br />

Accomplishments<br />

Developed the technical support for the 1979 non'<br />

passenger automobile fuel economy standards<br />

rulemaking.<br />

Developed the technical support for the 1981-1984<br />

passenger automobile fuel economy standards<br />

rulemaking.<br />

Developed technical support for the proposed<br />

1980-1981 nonpassenger automobile fuel economy<br />

standards rulemaking.<br />

Currently developing technical support for pro'<br />

posed 1984-1986 passenger automobile fuel econ'<br />

omy standards rulemaking'<br />

Accomplishments<br />

Conducted full-scale crash tests with Ch€vsttes<br />

and Vegas, to demonstrate that driver air bag systems<br />

using off-the-shelf technology will meet the<br />

requirements of FMVS$ No. 208, Passive Festaints,<br />

in small cars.<br />

Completed accident data analysis for Vega and<br />

Capri production steering columns.<br />

Initiated a program to obtain data on the motion of<br />

occupants in lateral collisions.<br />

Conducted a program to integrate advanced technology<br />

active and passive restraint systems into<br />

production compact cars (Volvos).<br />

Conducted a series of tests to evaluate ths benefits<br />

of a web locking device in improving the performance<br />

of stock three'point seat-belt systems (1975<br />

Torlno).<br />

Initiated a program to develop improved passive<br />

belts for occupants of small cars.<br />

Conducted Phase I development program for pas'<br />

sive air bag protectlon for front-seat passengers of<br />

small cars.<br />

Accompllehments<br />

Sponsored and conducted two workshops on<br />

"Head and Neck lnjury." Initial efforts have produced<br />

a standardized head-neck autopsy protocol<br />

and an initial proposed coding suitable for computer<br />

storage and retrleval.<br />

52<br />

FUEL ECONOMY<br />

OCCUPANT PACKAGING<br />

Application<br />

Standards were issued by NHTSA in March 1977.<br />

Standards were issued by NHTSA in July 1977.<br />

Proposed standards were issued December 15'<br />

1977.<br />

Proposed stqndards to be issued by NHTSA in mid-<br />

FY 1978.<br />

Application<br />

$upports passive restraints standard (FMVSS No.<br />

208) issued in June 1977.<br />

Supports upgrade of steering column standards<br />

(FMVSS No. 203 and No. 204).<br />

Supports upgrade of occupant protection stand'<br />

ards for lateral collisions.<br />

Supports the pa$sive restraint standard (FMVSS<br />

No. 208) for smaller cars and lays the groundwork<br />

for the FMVSS 400 Series- of standards for passive<br />

protection at higher speeds.<br />

Supports the FMVSS 400 Series of standards for<br />

passive protection at higher speeds'<br />

Supports FMVSS No. 208 issued in June 1977, and<br />

lays the groundwork for the FMVS$ 400 $eries of<br />

standards for passive protection at higher speeds.<br />

Supports FMVSS No. 208 issued in June 1977, and<br />

lays the groundwork for the FMVSS 400 Series of<br />

standards for passive protection at higher speeds'<br />

BIOMECHANICS<br />

Appflcatlon<br />

This process will ultimately provide a data base of<br />

actual head and neck injuries upon which to<br />

develop improved head injury criteria for upgrading<br />

occupant protection standards. flo be included in a<br />

new series)


Table '12. 1977 Research Accomplishments end Application to Motor Vehicle Standards<br />

(Gontinued)<br />

BIOMECHANICS-Continued<br />

Accomplishments Application<br />

Initiated study of femur-pelvic complex injuries in<br />

the automobile crash environment.<br />

Demonstrated feasibility of accurately predicting<br />

head and brain injury f rom head motion parameters.<br />

Designed and built a mechanfcal impacting systBffi<br />

which has been used to replicate the impact of a<br />

pedestrian leg on the front of a vehicle.<br />

Will provide a basis for the improvement of occu.<br />

pant protection standards (a new series) especially<br />

in the lateral impact mode.<br />

Appropriate Extsnsion of this approach will provide<br />

the basis for a more valid head protection perform.<br />

ance standard for application to a new series.<br />

Provides the basis for leg protection in a pedestrian<br />

impact injury mitigation standard.<br />

STRUCTURES<br />

Accomplishments Appllcation<br />

Initlated experimental and analytical research for<br />

the development of structural concepts to improve<br />

side impact protection of subcompact and compact<br />

vehicles.<br />

Investigated the structural and englne mass aggressive<br />

effects in car-to-car collisions.<br />

Initiated research for the development of testmethods<br />

and devices for measuring aggressiv+<br />

ness of production vehicles.<br />

Initiated testing of existing "basellne" electrlc<br />

vehicles.<br />

VEHICLE HANDLING<br />

Will provlde technlcal basis and support for upgrading<br />

the side impact protection standard<br />

(FMVSS No.214).<br />

Will assist in the development of efflclent iest<br />

methods and devices for measuring aggressiveness<br />

of future production vehicles (FMVSS 400<br />

Series).<br />

Will provide technical basis and compliance proce.<br />

dures for future vehicle compatibility/aggressiveness<br />

standards (FMVSS 400 $eries).<br />

Provided data for the report to Congress,<br />

"Appllca.<br />

bility of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards<br />

and Regulations to Electric and Hybrid Vehicles."<br />

Accomplishments Application<br />

Tested response parameters for a sample of motorcycles<br />

and correlated the results with proven<br />

experiences, Effectiveness of anti-lock brakes in<br />

accident avoidance was also examined.<br />

Initiated deVelopment of a hierarchy of vehicte<br />

simulation models for evaluating open and closed<br />

loop dynamic responses of vehicles.<br />

Began fabricatlon of a modular wind-generating<br />

machine designed to simulate a variety of aero.<br />

dynamic disturbances.<br />

Began fabrication of a portable device which will<br />

provide data on the dynamic handling propefiies of<br />

vehicles.<br />

Inltiated study on the effects of truck and trailer<br />

frame torsional bending relative to their handling<br />

and stability.<br />

Test procedures developed will be suitable for<br />

assessing controllability of motorcycles. Performance<br />

criteria will support future rulemaking.<br />

Models will serve as effective tools in developing<br />

efficient test methods in the area of vehicle handling.<br />

Will verlfy vehicle response to known aerodynamic<br />

disturbances and set performance standards for<br />

eventual rulemaking.<br />

aid those NHTSA contractors Involved in<br />

utilizing computer simulation techniques for handling<br />

studies.<br />

Quantif ication of this unknown element wlll lead to<br />

better understanding of this class of vehicle and<br />

provide the basis for rulemaking.<br />

53


Table 12. lgTT Research Accompllshments and Application to Motor Vehlcle $tandards<br />

(Contlnued)<br />

Accomplishments<br />

Initiated investigation on the feasibllity of applying<br />

the principles of fluidics to anti-lock brakes for<br />

motorcycles.<br />

Completed the design, fabrlcation and checkout of<br />

a lightweight, highly reliable, accurate instrumenta'<br />

tion package suitable for crash-avoidance testing<br />

of small vehicles.<br />

Accomplishments<br />

Continued work on accelerated tire treadwear<br />

validation in an effort to rate treadwear in less than<br />

50 miles, regardless of test course, and without a<br />

control tire.<br />

The non-destructive test (NDT/road correlation<br />

program is approximately 35 percent complete.<br />

Road tests have generated tire failures (stopped<br />

prior to tire rupture) and reinspection by reflection<br />

ultrasonic NDT will be accomplished in the second<br />

quarter of FY-78. Full program validation is scheduled<br />

for completion in the fourth quarter of FY-78.<br />

Revised and expanded Monograph 122,<br />

"Mechanics<br />

of Pneumatic Tires," to ref lect the advances in the<br />

state-of-the-art, applicable to theory, test and<br />

manufacture of tires, since its 1971 edition.<br />

Developed and applied for a patent on a NDT tire<br />

casing bead integrity system. NHTSA patent application<br />

will permit system design and use to all<br />

interested users.<br />

Accomolishments<br />

VEHICLE HANDLING-Conllnued<br />

Conducted preliminary research to establish passenger<br />

car hydraulic brake performance levels lor<br />

straight and curved path braking on surfaces hav'<br />

ing low and split coefficients of friction.<br />

Initiated research into the development of a long'<br />

life hydraulic brake system and test methods cap+<br />

ble of establishing durability levels.<br />

Initiated research to develop a single braking per'<br />

formance standard for trucks, buses, and multipurpose<br />

passenger vehicles having either hydraulic<br />

or air brakes.<br />

Conducted testing to evaluate compatibility prob'<br />

lems experienced in operating mixtures of pre- and<br />

post-FMVSS No. 121 braking systems in combina'<br />

tion heavy duty vehicles.<br />

54<br />

Application<br />

Demonstrates the technical and economical benefits<br />

of this approach and provides a data base for<br />

potential rulemaki ng actions.<br />

Will be used by NHTSA contractors, particularly for<br />

testing vehicles with small load capacities; i.e.,<br />

where regular instrumentation would cause overload.<br />

BRAKES<br />

Application<br />

lf successful, new system and test technique could<br />

be used for compliance testing and certification.<br />

NDT wlll be useful for precompllance testlng In<br />

identifying defective tires, as well as for determin.<br />

ing faults generated during compliance testing.<br />

Utilized by all who are interested in improving tire<br />

performance and safety.<br />

Cost effective NDT system for use in FMVSS"I17<br />

compliance testing. System will detect casing bead<br />

failures prior to retreading and assure quality and<br />

safer retreads.<br />

Application<br />

Expand and improve FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic<br />

Erake Sysfems.<br />

Expand FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic Brake Sysferns.<br />

Supports FMVSS No. 105-75, Hydraulic Brake<br />

Sysfems and FMVSS No. 121, Air Bra4e Sysferns.<br />

$upport FMVSS No. 121, Air Brake Sysfefl?s'<br />

:


Tabfe 12' 1977 Research Accompllshments and Appllcatlon to Motor Vehlcle Standeds<br />

(Contlnued)<br />

BRAKES-Contlnued<br />

Accomplishments Application<br />

Completed f ntegration of electronic emergency Docket 72-1, Automatic Braitng Systems, ANPHM.<br />

braking function with two types of production brak.<br />

lng systems (hydraulic power boost and vacuum :<br />

power boost), and conducted preliminary controlled<br />

tEsts.<br />

THE DRIVER AND THE VEHICLE<br />

Accomplishments Application<br />

ldentified and studied driver problems in operating Supports upgrading of FMVSS No. 101.<br />

fingertip reach controls.<br />

ldentified the significance of mismatches between Will have an impact on setting priorities for future<br />

driver capabilities and vehicle design characteris- resgarch and rulemaking.<br />

tics in accident causation.<br />

Completed a field study of several innovatlve rear After verlflcation, thls type of rear lighilng system<br />

fighting and signalling systems and lound that a may be considered in a future revision of FMVSS<br />

single, center, high-mounted brake signal reduced No. 108.<br />

rear-end accidents by 54% compared to a control<br />

group with the conventional rear system.<br />

Developed a method for analytically evaluating Wll be consldered in future revlslons of FMVSS<br />

vehicle lighting in fog and determined lamp design No. 108, to Incorporate a fog lamp standard.<br />

parameters for improved fog lamps.<br />

Analyzed the signalling requirements for emer- May be consldered in future revisions of FMVSS<br />

gency, school bus, and service vehicles and devel- No. 108, to incorporate emergency signal lights in<br />

oped recommendations for a nationwide unllorm this standard.<br />

communication system for those vehicles.<br />

Initiated a study to evaluate the feasibility of a May be used in future revisions of FMVSS No. 10g.<br />

single beam headlighting system.<br />

Developed equipment and procedures for objective Will provide a basis for establishing refined<br />

measurement of visibility quality, and collected performance standards for windshield wipers,<br />

preliminary data relating such measures to driver washers, defrosters, and defogger$, and a means<br />

visual performance. for compliance te$ting against such standards.<br />

Completed a study of ability of passenger car Provide important data relative to the integrated<br />

drivers to detect, identify, and judge targets p6r- direct and indirect visibility requirements of vehicle<br />

ceived only through peripheral vislon. drivers and the establishment of an integrated<br />

standard lor vehicle vislbility systems.<br />

FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS<br />

Accompllshments Appticalon<br />

fnitiated research to identifyanti-theft performance Upgrade FMVSS No. 114, Thelt prevention-pascriteria<br />

and develop a cost beneficlal security sys- senger Cars.<br />

tem for passenger cars that is effective in reducrng<br />

th6ft.<br />

'This<br />

will be a new s6rl6s not previously having a numerical d€Blgnailon,<br />

55<br />

:


Table 13. Data Acqulsition and Statlstlcal Analysis<br />

Flesearch AccomPl ishments<br />

Publlshed two studies evaluating the effects of the<br />

S$mph speed limit.<br />

Initiated a truck fleet accident evaluation of the alr<br />

brake standard.<br />

Contlnued the motorcycllst neck injury study'<br />

Completed a study on causss of motor vehicle traf'<br />

fic accidents.<br />

Initiated an lntegrated and contlnulng natlonwlde<br />

sample of motor vehicle accident phenomena'<br />

Published a statistical study of heavy truck accldent<br />

severity.<br />

Continued crash severity study, focuslng on mea'<br />

sur€ment of accident severity indices with accom'<br />

panying injury.<br />

Initiated a pedestrian injury causation study.<br />

Continued and expanded the exposure data program.<br />

Initiated accident analysis ol narrow bridge colll'<br />

sions.<br />

Contlnued comparatlve study of accidents involv'<br />

ing breakaway and non-breakaw?Y poles.<br />

Provided analytlcal support to defect investlgation<br />

cases.<br />

Provided analytical support to rulemaking activi'<br />

ties.<br />

Continued field evaluation of air bag/passlve r+<br />

$traint system.<br />

Continued school bus crash investlgations.<br />

56<br />

Application<br />

To provide increased support to the maintenance of<br />

the 55-mph speed limit.<br />

To provide information on the relative accident rate<br />

of trucks with "improved"<br />

air brakes vs. those not<br />

so equipped.<br />

To determine relationship between head/neck injury<br />

and motorcycle helmet usage.<br />

Provided statistics on causes as related to driver<br />

error, driver conditions, avoidance maneuvgrs,<br />

vehicle conditions, and highway and environmental<br />

factors.<br />

To collect nationally representative data on motor<br />

vehicle accidents for detailed statistics and for<br />

design and evaluation of standards and countermeasure$.<br />

Will help to understand the safety problems of<br />

heavy trucks and the effects of increased size and<br />

weight on highway safetY.<br />

To provide better information for the design of<br />

effective crashworthiness motor vehicle safety<br />

standards.<br />

To identify injury causes, to determine pedestrian<br />

InJury severity, and to recommend modification of<br />

the vehicle exterior to eliminate vehicle protrusions.<br />

To supplement accident data, especially in the<br />

analysis of factors contributing to traffic accidents'<br />

To measure the accident problem at narrow bridges<br />

and to determine the injury severity and vehicle<br />

crashworthiness following collisions with bridges<br />

and approaches.<br />

To identify the extBnt of these accidents and to<br />

examine the relative vehlcle damage and personal<br />

injury attributed to collisions with both types of<br />

poles.<br />

Data supportecl valldity of defect assessm€nts<br />

against vehicle manufacturers and aided in preparation<br />

of court cases.<br />

Analyses and stati$tical interpretations of research<br />

studies aided in assessing the potential value of<br />

proposed highway safetY rules.<br />

To determine protection given occupants in various<br />

crash types and to provide data leading to system<br />

improvem€nts.<br />

To assess vehicle damage and its relation to occu'<br />

pant injury. May result in school bus design modif<br />

ications.


CHAPTER 12<br />

NATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY<br />

ADVISORY COUNCIL<br />

The National Motor Vehicle Safety Advisory<br />

Council was created by the Congress in 1966 to<br />

consult with the Secretary of Transportation on<br />

and acceptance. During the Congress the Council<br />

presented its Excalibur Award to Dr. John D.<br />

States of Rochester, New York, for his outstand-<br />

motor vehicle safety standards. The 3O-member ing work in automotive safety. In addition, Speno<br />

Council included representatives of State and local<br />

governments, researchers, motor vehicle manufac-<br />

Awards, given annually for the best technical<br />

papers presented at the Congress, were awarded to<br />

turers, motor vehicle equipment manufacturers,<br />

and motor vehicle dealers. The Council has provided<br />

a public voice in the administration of the<br />

Joseph W. Little, Professor of Law, University of<br />

Florida, and Dr. R. Eugene Goodson of the Institute<br />

of Interdisciplinary Engineering Studies, Pur-<br />

motor vehicle safety program, and has been an due University.<br />

indicator of public and industry reaction to proposed<br />

safety standards.<br />

During 1977 the Council met in full session three<br />

Eleven of the Council's members participated in<br />

the newly-created Truck and Bus Safety Subcom,<br />

mittee, meeting jointly with their ten counterparts<br />

times, while its subcommittees met six times. The<br />

Council sponsored a Head and Neck Injury Work-<br />

of the National Highway Safety Advisory Committee's<br />

subcornrnittee. There were ll joint subshop<br />

in April, bringing together leading national<br />

and international experts in this field, and providing<br />

a forum for discussion and debate on such<br />

committee rneetings, at which issues of FMVSS<br />

No. l2l, Air Brake Systerus, were explored. As a<br />

result of public hearings and debates and staff<br />

topics as methods ol' identificarion of head and presentations, the subcommittees prepared three<br />

neck injury mechanisms and injury tolerance reports to the Secretary of Transportation.<br />

levels, the relationship of those mechanisms to the<br />

pathology of injury, and factors necessary for<br />

valid surrogate assessment of safety system performance.<br />

The overall goal of the workshop was<br />

The Council was terminated on October l, 1977,<br />

in accordance with Section 107 ol'the Motor Vehicle<br />

and Schoolbus Safety Amendments of 1974.<br />

to provide DOT with information for assessing the<br />

quality and direction of departmental programs<br />

Major accomplishments for 1977 are listed below.<br />

A list of members at termination is given in Ap-<br />

for the development of standards for head and<br />

neck protection.<br />

pendix B.<br />

In July the Council sponsored its Fifth International<br />

Congress on Automotive Safety. The theme<br />

of the Congress was "Motor Vehicle Goals Beyond<br />

1980," and the major objectives were to<br />

explore the interaction of automotive safety with<br />

fuel economy, emissions, road performance, problems<br />

of manufacturers, repair and parts replace*<br />

ment, resistance to damage, first cost, operating<br />

expenses, other economic factors, and user needs<br />

Reports<br />

t Safety Defect Recalt Campaigns*-A review<br />

of NHTSA's safety defect recall program, including<br />

a number of recommendations for broadening<br />

the scope of safety defect recall procedures and<br />

information sources.<br />

*See Appendix D, Number:t6.<br />

57


t NHTSA Research Activities*-A review of<br />

research<br />

activities within NHTSA.<br />

*See Appendix D, Nurnber 32.<br />

**Available from NHTSA,uExecutive Secretariat,<br />

r Increase campaigns to encourage use ofsafety<br />

belts.<br />

t Head and Neck Injury Seminar-Areport on<br />

a two-day seminar which prescnted current research<br />

on this subjcct, included recommendations<br />

on the use of this research, and stressed the urgent<br />

need for future research, particularly in the area<br />

of trauma,**<br />

r Revise and update NHTSA performanceoriented<br />

motor vehicle safety standards.<br />

r Prepare a film on helmet effectiveness for the<br />

benefit of States contemplating repeal of helmetuse<br />

laws.<br />

e Factor of Two-A report on the difficulties<br />

of relating car-barrier crash tests with car-car<br />

crash tests.*+<br />

. Evaluate motor vehicle safety standards and<br />

attendant activities, to determine the need for continuation<br />

or modification.<br />

r Create a representative public body, to assure<br />

Recommendntions<br />

continued review of DOT's motor vehicle safetv<br />

program.<br />

. Fromulgate a passive restraint standard,<br />

while promoting mandatory seat,belt usage as a<br />

first-step measure until passive systemsi are available.<br />

r Review and update .,Study on lg80 Goals for<br />

Commercial Vehicles" and "Report on Motor<br />

Vehicle Goals Beyond 1980."<br />

r Collect data on moped accidents.<br />

5g<br />

r Continue the International Congress on<br />

Automotive Safetv.


CHAPTER 13<br />

ADMINISTRATION<br />

Organizational Changes<br />

A new organization for the National Highway<br />

Traffic Safety Administration was approved on<br />

December 16, 1977, effective January l, 1978<br />

(Figure 29).<br />

Several changes were made. Major among these<br />

are the change in structure and functional alignment<br />

designed to merge all rulemaking activities<br />

(i.e., motor vehicle safety standards, average fuel<br />

economy standards, and consumer information<br />

regulations and modifications) under an Associate<br />

Administrator for Rulemaking, and the consolidation<br />

ol all enforcement activities under an Associate<br />

Administrator for Enforcement. 'Ihese<br />

changes abolish the Office of the Associate Administrator<br />

fbr Motor Vehicle Programs and the<br />

Office of Automotive Fuel Economy.<br />

ASOTIATI AOMITISTft ATON<br />

FON TFAfFIC 5AF ETY<br />

PSOGBAMS<br />

tTitl<br />

Concurrent with changes in the administration of<br />

motor vehicle safety and consumer information<br />

and protection, the planning, research, and test<br />

programs were also restructured:<br />

r The Office of Vehicle Systems Research was<br />

abolished and the Offices of Passenger Vehicle<br />

Research and l{eavy Duty Vehicle Research were<br />

placed under Research and Development.<br />

r A Vehicle Research and Test Center was<br />

established under Research and Development, to<br />

consolidate all activities of the Engineering Test<br />

Facility in East Liberty, Ohio, the Safety Research<br />

Laboratory at Riverdale, Maryland, and the Uniform<br />

Tire Quality Grading Facility at San Angelo,<br />

Texas.<br />

r The title of the Associate Administrator for<br />

Planning and Evaluation was changed to Associate<br />

Administrator for Plans and Programs, the<br />

oFFtcE 0i<br />

FUEUC ArfArAS At0<br />

c0lsuf li FAnTrcrf AT|oI<br />

Flgure 29. Netionol Hlghway Trafflc Safety Administretlon<br />

r0A{


Office of Program Planning was abolished, and<br />

the Office of Program Analysis was renamed the<br />

Office of Program and Rulemaking Analysis.<br />

r The Office of Public Affairs and Consumer<br />

Services was retitled the Office of Public Affairs<br />

and Consumer Participation, to emphasize the<br />

increased public involvement in NHTSA's programs.<br />

Management Improvements<br />

To provide management with an information system<br />

consistent with program goals and objectives,<br />

NHTSA developed procedures for recording and<br />

reporting grant obligations and expenditures<br />

(under Section 402 of the Highway Safety Act of<br />

1966) by subject matter and remedial measures.<br />

Three 40*hour technical courses in Automotive<br />

Fuel Economy were conducted by the University<br />

of Maryland, to assist about 50 NHTSA employees<br />

to adjust to program changes resulting from<br />

NHTSA's increased mission in automotive fuel<br />

economy.<br />

60<br />

Civil Rights<br />

The achievements of NHTSA's Civil Rights and<br />

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program<br />

for 1977 are summarized as follows:<br />

r A Cooperative Education Program was initiated.<br />

Participants were 42 percent minority and<br />

57 percent female.<br />

r Women employees participated, through the<br />

NHTSA Federal Women's Program, in training<br />

designed to enhance an appreciation of their<br />

potential and to develop career-planning skills.<br />

r Minority representation in professional positions<br />

was increased from 9.8 percent to 10.4 percent<br />

of total jobs in this category.<br />

r Pre-grant reviews for civil rights implications<br />

were made for the first time-and prior to funding-of<br />

all State highway safety plans.<br />

r The goal of contracts awarded to minority<br />

business enterprises was exceeded for the sixth<br />

consecutive year.


GLOSSARY<br />

CB<br />

CCMS<br />

CITA<br />

CMT<br />

DOT<br />

ECE<br />

ECMT<br />

EEC<br />

EEO<br />

EEVC<br />

EPA<br />

ESV<br />

ETF<br />

FARS<br />

FEA<br />

FHWA<br />

FMVSS<br />

6PO<br />

GVWR<br />

tRvw<br />

rsA<br />

ISRS<br />

M<br />

MITI<br />

MPC<br />

MY<br />

NASS<br />

NCSA<br />

NCSS<br />

NHTSA<br />

NTIS<br />

OECD<br />

PICS<br />

RSV<br />

SAE<br />

SRL<br />

TRC<br />

UTQG<br />

- Citizens' Band<br />

* Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society<br />

- Committee International de I'Inspcction Technique Automobile<br />

- Course Monitoring Tire<br />

- Department of Transportation<br />

- Economic Commission for Europe<br />

- European Conference oI Ministers of Transport<br />

- European Economic Community<br />

- Equal Employment Opportunity<br />

- European Experimental Vehicle Committee<br />

- Environmental Protection Agency<br />

- Experimental Safety Vehicle<br />

- Engineering Test Facility<br />

- Fatal Accident Reporting System<br />

- Federal Energy Administration<br />

- Federal Highway Adtnitristration<br />

* Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard<br />

- Government Printing Office<br />

- Gross Vehicle Wcight Rating<br />

- Integratcd Research Volkswagen<br />

- Internalional Standards Orgatrization<br />

- Injury Severity Reporting System<br />

- Million<br />

- Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Japan)<br />

- Miles Per Gallon<br />

- Model Year<br />

- National Accident Sampling System<br />

- National Center for Statistics and Analysis<br />

- National Crash Severity Study<br />

- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration<br />

- National Technical Information Service<br />

- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development<br />

- Pedestrian lnjury Causation Study<br />

- Research Safety Vehicle<br />

- Society of Automotive Engineers<br />

- Safety Research Laboratory<br />

- Transportation Research Center<br />

- Uniform Tire Quality Grading<br />

61


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure Page<br />

A-1<br />

A-Z<br />

A-3<br />

A-4<br />

A-5<br />

A-6<br />

A.7<br />

A-8<br />

Trends in Vehicle Mileage and Mileage Death Rate, 1957-1977<br />

Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by State, 1977 and Percent Change from 1976<br />

Motor Vehicle Traffic Death Rate, 1977, and Percent Change from 1976<br />

Trends in Motor Vehicle Registrations, Licensed Drivers and Vehicle Miles of Travgl,<br />

A-5<br />

A"6<br />

A-7<br />

A-8<br />

A-S<br />

A-10<br />

1957-1577<br />

A-14 Pedestrian and Motor Vehlcle Occupant Fatalltles, 1957-1977<br />

A-14 Motorcycle and Bicycle Fatalities, 1957-1977<br />

A-15 Weekend-Weekday Contrast in Fatality Rates, 1977<br />

A-16 Monthly Death Rates,lor 1972,1973, and 1977<br />

A-17 Trend in Motor Vehicle Death Rates, 1957-1977<br />

A-18 Trend in Ratios of Registered Vehicles to Drivers and Population, 1957*1977<br />

.<br />

A-11<br />

A-12<br />

A-13<br />

A-14<br />

A-15<br />

A-16<br />

A-17<br />

A-18<br />

A-19<br />

A-20<br />

A'21<br />

A-22<br />

A-20 Total Motor Vehicle Travel, 1957-1977<br />

A-21 Motor Vehicle Travel on All Highway Systems, 1971-1976<br />

A"22 Motor Vehicle Travel on the Interstate Highway System, 1971-1976<br />

A.22 Motor Vehicle Travel on Non-lnterstate Highway Systems, 1971-1976<br />

A-23 Average Free-Moving Travel Speed on the Rural Interstate System, 1960-1977<br />

A-25 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />

4-26 Percent Increase in Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977<br />

A-28 Distribution of Male Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />

A-28 Percent Increase in Male Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977<br />

A-30 Distribution of Female Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />

A-31 Percent Increase in Female Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1ffi7-1977<br />

A-35 Comparison of Traffic Deaths and lndustrial Production Index, U.S., 1957-1977<br />

A'3 ,'.


LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table<br />

A-1<br />

A-2<br />

A-3<br />

A-4<br />

A-5<br />

A-6<br />

A-7<br />

A-8<br />

A-S<br />

A-10<br />

A-11<br />

A-12<br />

A-13<br />

A-14<br />

A15<br />

A16<br />

A-17<br />

A-4<br />

Page<br />

A-9 Basic Statistics About Motor Vehicle Traffic Deaths in the United States<br />

1957, 1967-1977<br />

A-10 Basic Data Pertaining to Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, United States, 1957-1977<br />

A-11 Growth in Population and Motor Vehicle Registration<br />

A"12 Number and Distribution of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Type, 1957-1977<br />

A-13 Number and Population Death Flate of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Type in<br />

the Accident, 1957 -1977<br />

A-19 Types of Motor Vehicles Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1975-1976<br />

A-19 Comparison of Number of Miles Traveled Annually by Type of Vehicle, 1975-1976<br />

A-24 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977, Total<br />

A-27 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977, Male<br />

A-29 Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1971, Female<br />

A-32 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />

A-33 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Male Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />

A-34 Percent Distribution, by Age, of Female Drivers Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />

A-36 $afety Belt Percent Usage, 1974-1977 Passenger Cars<br />

A-37 Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Age and Sex, United States, 1976<br />

A-38 Leading Causes of Death by Age and Sex, United States, 1975<br />

A-46 Fatality Rates for the United States and Setected Foreign Countries, 1g7S


Motor Vehicle Travsl<br />

(Billions of vehicle miles)<br />

Mileage Death Flate<br />

(Fatalities<br />

per 1 00,000.000<br />

vehicle miles)<br />

_ 1600 8.0 -<br />

_ 1400<br />

- 1200 6.0 -<br />

- 800<br />

1 Mileage Death Rate<br />

T A<br />

\- l^{<br />

\<br />

Motor Vehicle Travel<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

NHTSA<br />

GoalI<br />

- 600 3.O -<br />

- 400 2,0 -<br />

- 200 1.0 -<br />

1 955 1 965 1 970 1 975 r 980<br />

NOTE: lmprovEmentsinvehicles,roadr,andsafetyofoperationhavereducedthedeathratepBrmile<br />

of travel by ffiore than 43 percent since 1957, The decline in the mileage death rate means that<br />

it is r'low pcssible to travel almost 18,000 milBs aI the sdme risk that wa$ attsined in driving<br />

10.000 miles in 1957.<br />

Figure A-1. Trends in Vehlcle Mileage and Mlleage Death Rate, 1957-1977<br />

5.0 *<br />

A-5


A.6<br />

q r q<br />

' u t r<br />

t O r f l , ^<br />

Elst<br />

= i q<br />

< F : <<br />

E > E E<br />

Srt<br />

,^ 6+<br />

il<br />

d<br />

(tt<br />

o<br />

J<br />

I**o s<br />

lE=e;<br />

E;"de E<br />

*t$<br />

rtF<br />

c\l +<br />

r N<br />

(o(\<br />

(o+<br />

Nrs<br />

cit N<br />

gr+<br />

(al<br />

t: s+<br />

tr<br />

s<br />

q<br />

:)<br />

's b<br />

o<br />

E 8<br />

h F<br />

s E<br />

E $<br />

c d :<br />

d F q<br />

E o o<br />

uIg<br />

=<br />

Eer<br />

d F<br />

q<br />

(o<br />

1+<br />

P E<br />

s g<br />

r F<br />

F.q o<br />

or "r<br />

Glt<br />

F<br />

o-r F<br />

I F<br />

E :<br />

= q<br />

O<br />

F5 d'<br />

E ' E . ; H<br />

9 l o : H o<br />

E BFE ot<br />

h r i t E<br />

P E E B E<br />

= s:T r--<br />

fl #e: H<br />

# E-tl<br />

; tEE ot<br />

E . E 3 e E<br />

E fr;,i 6<br />

i HHE i^<br />

S i 6 Y o<br />

,F *.Ei .E<br />

- r d F<br />

E H : E E<br />

E;HE E<br />

-o si+ E O<br />

S EilE =<br />

F ? € E E<br />

tr H.{i* F<br />

E;+* +<br />

r rr*<br />

j '=<br />

I - o E E<br />

.il F'(o E<br />

.E l-. I r<br />

E H+; g<br />

,f 5Ef €<br />

=s c,<br />

. . {<br />

r t E<br />

e . a lr


E<br />

T o q<br />

q i ' o<br />

**Hd<br />

# F j . q<br />

= - 6<br />

< r - l 4<br />

E > Z E<br />

c9 r,i I<br />

q<br />

E<br />

F;"qq T<br />

en*-o?cu e<br />

d z N * t i ;<br />

- F ; ; 1 ; L i<br />

crUeEE ci<br />

r<br />

{<br />

ritr<br />

j T +<br />

N<br />

+<br />

z,<br />

z<br />

w<br />

F C olq{<br />

E dt+<br />

(\<br />

q<br />

+<br />

ro<br />

N<br />

(r,<br />

,1<br />

l<br />

. Q<br />

s<br />

{<br />

!c<br />

a<br />

{<br />

{<br />

o<br />

E E<br />

E b<br />

t r +<br />

E A<br />

o q<br />

o h<br />

A o q<br />

E o i ' i<br />

- o o o<br />

O o ( s<br />

uut<br />

O *it<br />

. ( o<br />

l\<br />

P E<br />

i e<br />

i o *<br />

l o<br />

! E t<br />

, i B E<br />

E g T E<br />

EE E (J<br />

gi fl +<br />

6.9 = tr<br />

.1 tr E. O<br />

P€ +f; H<br />

E{ci =,;<br />

o'<br />

RFE lq E<br />

# i : * = E 6<br />

i =.e F; ls<br />

i J I<br />

i = Q<br />

F ><br />

= L<br />

| \<br />

a t t<br />

!{ "';o a -<br />

t i gF V 3 L ; = J<br />

EtP Ht<br />

d<br />

F<br />

,iF-o- =3 -E<br />

i*T EI E<br />

6 E i l 4 S o<br />

;fi; EE E<br />

EB,,S EE i<br />

:!; Hr o<br />

frEfl N.5 E<br />

F'6 iJ l" E-' E<br />

E E : S E S<br />

l j l o - a F<br />

f # 3 : f b<br />

u H E<br />

r E O<br />

J z a a<br />

g 4 P<br />

. =<br />

ED<br />

, l r<br />

i<br />

.i<br />

l


Percent Increase<br />

-240<br />

- 200<br />

- 120<br />

--80<br />

-40<br />

1 955<br />

Vehicle Miles<br />

of Travel<br />

SOUFICE; Federaf High way Ad mi n istrat io n, H ig h wey Sfat ltfus.<br />

Motor Vehicle<br />

Begistrations<br />

1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />

NOTE: Between 1 957 and the fuel 5hortage ar rhe end of 1 973 there wes a rapid growth<br />

in the use of motor vehicles. Vehicle miles traveled increased faster then the<br />

number of vehicles, and both increased faster than the number of drivers. Thus,<br />

travel per vehicle, travel per driver, and vehicles per driver increased throughout<br />

the period,<br />

Figure A'4. Trends In Motor Vehicle Regi$trations, Licensed Drivers and<br />

Vehfcfe Miles of Travet. lglt-lgt7


Q<br />

o<br />

(E<br />

u,<br />

tt o<br />

= tr<br />

5<br />

o<br />

.E<br />

.E ah<br />

(E<br />

(l)<br />

o<br />

.9<br />

IE<br />

l= ctt<br />

-tr ri.<br />

.q) iE)<br />

>gt<br />

9n;<br />

orD<br />

r Ctt<br />

=<br />

o<br />

Il<br />

{ .D<br />

.g<br />

.g<br />

(g<br />

tn<br />

.g<br />

.h<br />

(g<br />

dl<br />

i<br />

4 g<br />

E (E<br />

U<br />

Ctt<br />

(o<br />

t*<br />

('r<br />

lo<br />

ttt<br />

t<br />

6'<br />

(n<br />

ot<br />

gr<br />

(',<br />

a,<br />

6,<br />

s<br />

co<br />

cD<br />

(o<br />

ot<br />

t*<br />

ro<br />

ar,<br />

E<br />

o<br />

g<br />

@ O J d ) O<br />

F G ' @ C O F<br />

G- +- $- -. O,<br />

r N<br />

q<br />

o 6 t r o ( o o<br />

c { o ( ? J l f +<br />

rrr t- +, .1 f,t<br />

lJ, e!<br />

q<br />

6 6 r @<br />

e { ( Y t s O o )<br />

u r ( t c f r N<br />

t ' - ' - d -<br />

( o ( f J o r s q<br />

c r ) c o s 6<br />

N C'l ('{<br />

r n J - N -<br />

t<br />

N F C ' 6 T O<br />

s o q )<br />

o-<br />

r f N<br />

ro<br />

6 r l l ( I ) N t<br />

E O ( o N C D C D<br />

r.fr.<br />

l t N<br />

ut<br />

c ! + r , ) N +<br />

{ o G ( o S<br />

r.o o<br />

N N<br />

r<br />

c{<br />

(o.<br />

N<br />

lf}<br />

(f,<br />

6<br />

m<br />

6<br />

u)<br />

N<br />

r<br />

c'j<br />

o{<br />

r<br />

o 6<br />

N<br />

fo<br />

l f N C D 6<br />

o<br />

' - a q a<br />

Gr lf + t)<br />

( o 8 0 0<br />

-' -' N -<br />

o o s f<br />

e{ C,l d) tO<br />

( o o t 6 f l<br />

( o c o r ( f J<br />

6r O, O)- O-<br />

r ( o N ( t )<br />

t r o ,<br />

t o ( o r , r<br />

o<br />

N<br />

o<br />

O c '<br />

o<br />

E n = 5 -<br />

= - -<br />

E E F c 5<br />

i " . J<br />

Fg o iD g<br />

: o<br />

.o><br />

:<br />

Z<br />

x ><br />

;i<br />

.-<br />

^ - n<br />

o -<br />

v 1E E ; H<br />

T E: !- E F<br />

O u = a O , =<br />

O Eg (E (E J<br />

l J t N r r<br />

( \ o o r r )<br />

ri e.i Gi +<br />

i 5 N ( 4<br />

( 4 F ( O<br />

N T N O )<br />

r j - - r j<br />

1., N c,l<br />

r o c o o J<br />

( f r e { @ f i<br />

r ; c J o +<br />

s N f o<br />

(\r o co (f,<br />

l r ' 6 0 0<br />

n t c " j - d<br />

s e { f l t<br />

r o r<br />

6 r +<br />

r - r t s<br />

+ N t<br />

N T N O<br />

( f , 6 N<br />

+ + d d<br />

t c { t<br />

{ r c o f t<br />

+ t o t<br />

+ ,ri rt rrt<br />

+ N S<br />

C { N E O<br />

r C.J CD<br />

+ F , r t r<br />

t N +<br />

c { | J t o r s<br />

q o q q q<br />

6 0 r ( o o ,<br />

q N s<br />

r o t + N<br />

+ o<br />

r t ; c i o<br />

| l ' N 6<br />

tl, a tD<br />

c ! c ? q :<br />

6 r t o '<br />

6 N g<br />

r f r c O<br />

r ( o b m<br />

r o + @<br />

s N r f<br />

3 -<br />

6 =<br />

E + :<br />

. . . = o ! l<br />

; € p 9<br />

.F<br />

E F ! d o<br />

= t 0 p<br />

' T F E E H<br />

- . = 4 E c<br />

6 6 Y<br />

f , € a a . ! l<br />

i i e ( E ( t J<br />

E o o o<br />

g P P P<br />

: P E P<br />

;<br />

b b b E<br />

. L L L 6 -<br />

6 o )<br />

o ( o<br />

- o<br />

r<br />

F<br />

(o<br />

( o l r }<br />

- o<br />

s<br />

H<br />

(o<br />

o<br />

N<br />

o,<br />

ro<br />

o<br />

c ! ( o<br />

q ' 4 o<br />

ro<br />

6<br />

o<br />

6<br />

O<br />

( D N<br />

o ' 6<br />

d o<br />

o ) s<br />

6 0 1<br />

@ s<br />

c i o<br />

o o<br />

o d<br />

6 = =<br />

f, E h h<br />

. c E ; j<br />

T E E b<br />

tr<br />

X 4 X d<br />

E s: f;+<br />

i g'O 9-,d<br />

. a - o<br />

F Il ;-A<br />

s,Y a a<br />

. o<br />

I<br />

I '<br />

d ; o<br />

E ;E g<br />

E; 2= E-'<br />

o 4 m :<br />

tsE :T E<br />

*<br />

93<br />

:<br />

ip.!<br />

B E J<br />

{* rt e<br />

r t i ; > E<br />

b > P= -.<br />

O € F E ;<br />

q o = o x<br />

E o : i 6 o<br />

'-;5 h: g<br />

8 E E 3 E i<br />

E5.,i frE r<br />

H : F E ' 9<br />

r::.: * i 0<br />

Eili:<br />

i l i F E<br />

+Ed 6<br />

E.E 6<br />

e b T<br />

Er g<br />

- \ c i;<br />

E(;g e<br />

q*<br />

'"-o t<br />

g<br />

; ? r ^<br />

Eii i Er i<br />

G * -<br />

i x m > a o T<br />

I{E I --.: H<br />

E3F.: ;T E<br />

gEF i 6* s<br />

; i * ; E * o I<br />

;B E<br />

md.E<br />

r' Ef :<br />

,, E- i<br />

5r-s 5 iE il<br />

i - F > : - C<br />

Eut; 3s H<br />

il€fr i sa F<br />

6(5t i ;o i<br />

:=@ i .SB S<br />

ii# p E+ E<br />

rf E F u E: E<br />

; - F o ' a l 3<br />

-<br />

esat H t*g<br />

e i J r ( ) + P F<br />

f *ou* EF: € ;E;<br />

F = 9o 9<br />

i G e q "<br />

- g E<br />

,, E C ;; ' =Y r<br />

E99 s, S E: B<br />

- E E P = * 9 c<br />

E z z : 6 t " E<br />

,{f f H i i! E<br />

:PP:: EE i<br />

F+o i ! o,: F<br />

; d r ' = r<br />

SP35co = fi<br />

!<br />

8<br />

9<br />

E<br />

-<br />

. .<br />

6<br />

U<br />

? L<br />

,:'i c( sJ<br />

F<br />

t<br />

r<br />

'<br />

H<br />

^ h<br />

Z<br />

A-9<br />

:!<br />

r<br />

:!


A.t0<br />

Year<br />

1557<br />

1 958<br />

1 959<br />

I 960<br />

1961<br />

1 962<br />

r 963<br />

1964<br />

I 965<br />

1 966<br />

1 967<br />

1968<br />

1 969<br />

1 970<br />

197 1<br />

1972<br />

1 973<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

1 976<br />

1977E<br />

Table A-2. Basic Data Pertaining to Motor vehicle Traffic Accldents.<br />

United States, 1957-1977<br />

Resid€nt<br />

Population<br />

(thousandsl<br />

171<br />

,187<br />

't74,149<br />

177,135<br />

179,979<br />

182,552<br />

185,771<br />

188,483<br />

1g 1,141<br />

193.526<br />

195,576<br />

157,467<br />

199,399<br />

201,385<br />

203,810<br />

206,212<br />

208,230<br />

209.844<br />

21 1,390<br />

213,124<br />

214,649<br />

216.332<br />

Licensed<br />

Drivers<br />

(thousands)<br />

79.631<br />

81,537<br />

84.498<br />

87,253<br />

BB,7 44<br />

90,588<br />

93,573<br />

95,468<br />

98,502<br />

100,998<br />

103,172<br />

105,410<br />

r 08,306<br />

1 1 1,543<br />

114,426<br />

118,414<br />

121,546<br />

125,427<br />

129,791<br />

134,036<br />

r 37,901<br />

Registered<br />

Motor<br />

Vehiqles<br />

(thousandsl<br />

67,5S5<br />

68.818<br />

71 ,919<br />

74,432<br />

76,557<br />

79,811<br />

83,484<br />

87,299<br />

91,740<br />

95,703<br />

98,859<br />

102,587<br />

107,412<br />

111,242<br />

116,330<br />

122,557<br />

130,025<br />

134,900<br />

137,926<br />

143,538<br />

148.880<br />

Vehicle<br />

Miles<br />

Traveled<br />

(billionsl<br />

647<br />

665<br />

700<br />

719<br />

738<br />

767<br />

805<br />

847<br />

888<br />

928<br />

966<br />

1,020<br />

1,066<br />

1 ,'t 14<br />

1,1 84<br />

1,265<br />

1,317<br />

1.283<br />

1,331<br />

r,409<br />

r,466<br />

Traffic<br />

Deaths<br />

36,S32<br />

35,331<br />

36,223<br />

36,399<br />

36,285<br />

38.980<br />

41,723<br />

45,645<br />

47,089<br />

50,8S4<br />

50,724<br />

52,725<br />

s3,543<br />

52,627<br />

52,542<br />

54,589<br />

54.052<br />

45,1 96<br />

44,525<br />

45,523<br />

47,671<br />

sources: vehicle Travel, Registered vehicfes and Licensed Drivers from Federal Highway<br />

Adrninisrratiofl<br />

. Highway Statistics Division<br />

Mileage<br />

Death Rate<br />

(Deaths per<br />

Hundred-Million<br />

Vehicle Milesl<br />

5.71<br />

5.32<br />

8.17<br />

5.06<br />

4.S2<br />

5.08<br />

5,18<br />

5.39<br />

5.30<br />

5.48<br />

5.25<br />

8.17<br />

5.02<br />

4.72<br />

4.44<br />

4.32<br />

4.11<br />

3.52<br />

3.35<br />

3,23<br />

3.25<br />

Population trom U.S. Bureau of the Census<br />

Traff ic Deaths: 1557'1914, f rom National Center for Health Statistics, HEW and State<br />

Accident Summaries (Adjusted to 30 Day Traffic Deaths).<br />

1975'1977 , from Fatar Accident Reporting system (30 Dav Traffic Deathsl.<br />

E - Estinreted.


tr<br />

o<br />

E<br />

u,<br />

ED<br />

o<br />

IE<br />

o<br />

(,<br />

E o,<br />

o<br />

E<br />

E<br />

TI<br />

tr<br />

cl<br />

tr<br />

o<br />

(g<br />

=<br />

a.<br />

o<br />

o-<br />

.S<br />

t<br />

E e<br />

(5<br />

a:,<br />

{ o<br />

lt cl<br />

E $+<br />

FIH<br />

13<br />

ctt<br />

fi He<br />

s!$<br />

E=sH<br />

ipflE<br />

gEEE<br />

{<br />

ro<br />

ctt<br />

€(lI<br />

ctr<br />

t \ I F | \ f l<br />

F tit


h<br />

gt<br />

I<br />

IlI<br />

g,<br />

ot<br />

CL<br />

}\<br />

>\<br />

-ct<br />

o<br />

.g<br />

.E(E<br />

(q<br />

l!<br />

.g<br />

E<br />

F<br />

g<br />

.g<br />

g)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

E<br />

o<br />

tr<br />

.9 =<br />

4l<br />

.9<br />

6<br />

TT<br />

tr<br />

(g<br />

o<br />

.cl<br />

E<br />

z<br />

T<br />

{<br />

e-ct<br />

G<br />

A-12<br />

+<br />

o<br />

t<br />

o<br />

*<br />

E<br />

o<br />

T'<br />

rlJ<br />

o-<br />

.? C'<br />

tJ<br />

o<br />

o<br />

E<br />

|J<br />

F<br />

o<br />

iE<br />

(E<br />

o<br />

(E<br />

o<br />

tr<br />

{,<br />

o<br />

dr<br />

A<br />

o<br />

E<br />

z<br />

tr<br />

o(,<br />

o<br />

4<br />

o<br />

4<br />

E<br />

z<br />

E o(,<br />

o<br />

4<br />

@<br />

-a E<br />

z<br />

c<br />

s<br />

(t,<br />

4<br />

o<br />

ll<br />

z,<br />

c<br />

(J<br />

d)<br />

o-<br />

s FJ<br />

z<br />

N Ot - F F fi LO (f, (O e! (o O F (\ O m (\t (O - O (f<br />

oe t e? q e-i r-- u? q q q'r'l a? q q q \ q u'l \ q q<br />

((' (O (c| (c} r\ r- CO CO cO F* r\ cO co r\ (l' tf, Lc) (r? O? \f Co<br />

l\ l-. F t-. l*- F t\ r\ t-. F* r\ r\ F r\ I\ F- r\ r\ l\ |\ F<br />

N - C? E) |rt O tYt lf,t O) El tl tO CO F (\ o) N (O i\ O Q<br />

F Ct - o * -<br />

-F - - 6.!<br />

EEESSe<br />

b ; s ' . * F<br />

) o : > : i<br />

E+i=r*€H<br />

' I r X l o 1 9<br />

-EgE:8f,<br />

EE."g<br />

Ei;<br />

fiE#E;€E<br />

,il- i<br />

an<br />

ll,<br />

F<br />

o z


Ir<br />

4l<br />

o<br />

.E<br />

.E<br />

|6<br />

(E<br />

lr<br />

.g<br />

(E<br />

te<br />

.g<br />

E<br />

st\<br />

bP<br />

H'r<br />

=t\<br />

= ttt<br />

- ctt<br />

bF<br />

o=rEo<br />

Ep<br />

€E<br />

E{<br />

oE<br />

E -<br />

.E.E<br />

(EO<br />

:- EL<br />

=!r<br />

5:F<br />

a-<br />

T'<br />

E<br />

r!<br />

s EI<br />

z tri<br />

t<br />

e3l<br />

(E<br />

F<br />

o<br />

o<br />

* tr<br />

,g<br />

q,<br />

TI s<br />

a<br />

.!<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

E<br />

.!<br />

o<br />

o<br />

i5<br />

-c<br />

g<br />

o<br />

(E<br />

o<br />

F<br />

+<br />

F<br />

(E<br />

€ Ea<br />

t<br />

d<br />

tq<br />

fE<br />

o<br />

lt tr<br />

z<br />

G<br />

E<br />

0<br />

E<br />

z<br />

*<br />

't tu<br />

G<br />

E<br />

s<br />

E<br />

z<br />

e<br />

e<br />

E,<br />

o<br />

s E<br />

z<br />

= 6<br />

:i .c)<br />

f *o.<br />

-;^*o<br />

( E =<br />

E s<br />

rSF Or(frdltf)(r)-COtf(oF-l$0COClft<br />

ul'4 q? u? c? o? a? q e : o? t q o, c? q q r: q t .:<br />

(o rr ro Lo [r) (O t* € cD O cr) c) O 6) o) OJ O, |.l, $, lil (o<br />

F F F c . ' l - N c ! - - F F F<br />

c\J r cvl or r$ c' crJ r, dl, \t { rlt r, r-- e{ o) cal (tr} F.. o o<br />

f-- (f, S O - O r ts u:, O + 6 r$ Ct rn (o C\t


A-14<br />

Deaths(thousands)<br />

-50<br />

_40<br />

-20<br />

-10<br />

I 955<br />

i l<br />

SOUBCES: Deaths:<br />

Deaths<br />

- 4000<br />

- 3500<br />

- 3000<br />

- 2s00<br />

- 2000<br />

-1500<br />

- 1000<br />

- 500<br />

- - - d<br />

at'<br />

I Pedestrians<br />

l t l r l<br />

1 960 1 S65 1 970 1975 1980<br />

1957-1974, E$timated by NHT$A from data supplied by Nationsl Center for<br />

Health Statistics, HEW and State Accident Summaries (adiusted<br />

to 30 dav deaths).<br />

1975-1977, NHTSA Fatal Accident Reporting System.<br />

Figure A"5. Pedestrian and Motor Vehicle Occupant Fatalities. 1957-1977<br />

r 955<br />

i r f i r - J d<br />

l t<br />

- - l<br />

1 970 1 975<br />

Flgure A.6. Motorcycle and Bicycle Fatallties, 1957-1977


Number of Fatalities<br />

per Hour<br />

-16<br />

# 12<br />

-8<br />

-4<br />

-0<br />

t t t l r r<br />

t t t r<br />

r l t l l l l l l<br />

EEEEE E EE EE E EEE EEFEE EqE EE<br />

(O F cO o) Q F 61 - ot (Q


A-16<br />

Mileage Death Rate<br />

- 5.0<br />

- 4.8<br />

-4<br />

- 4.2<br />

- 3.8<br />

- 3.6<br />

- 3.4<br />

- 3.2<br />

- 3.0<br />

- 2.8<br />

- 2.6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

SOURCE: Miledge data supplied by Federal Highway Administration,<br />

NOTE: Thegraphforl9T3,whencomparedtol9-l2,illustratesthegeneral trendof annual<br />

rerluction since the Highway Sefetv Act of 1966. The sharp drop that occurred at<br />

the end of 1973 6nd continued through 1977 also reflects the chanqe in automobile<br />

use resulting from the energy crisis.<br />

Figure A.8. Monthly Death Rates,lor 1972,1973, and 1977


-20<br />

,//<br />

Deaths per 100,000 Registered Vehicles<br />

t---<br />

, t l<br />

Deaths per 100,000<br />

Licensed Drivers<br />

-.1'+.1'<br />

Deaths per 100,000 Fesident Population<br />

I<br />

.l<br />

\.1-.:-.<br />

1955 1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />

SOUHCES: D6eths: 1957-1974, National Center for Hgdlth StEtistica and State Accident Summaries<br />

(adjusted to 30 day traffic deaths) ; 1915-1977, National Highway Traf{ic Saf ety Administration,<br />

The Fatal Accident Fleporting System.<br />

Vehicle travel, registered vehicles. and licensed drivers: Federal Highway Administrgtion<br />

Highway Statistics Divlsion.<br />

Pooulation: Burssu 61 the Censui.<br />

NOTE: From 1966 to 1973, deaths per registered vehicle and licensed driver have con$istently<br />

decreased while deaths per population have remained fairly constant. The reductions<br />

from 1974to 1977 mey be attributed largely to the speed limit.<br />

Figure A.9. Trend in Molor Vehlcle Death Rate$, lgSZ-1977<br />

A-17<br />

i<br />

I<br />

,l


A-18<br />

Ratio<br />

- 1.2<br />

F 1.0<br />

- 0.6<br />

- 0.4<br />

- 0.2<br />

Registered Vehicles<br />

Driver Licenses<br />

Registered Vehicles<br />

Population<br />

SOURCES: Registered VehiclesEnd Licensed Drivers: FHWA, Highway Statistics Division.<br />

Pooulation: Bureau of the Census,<br />

'<br />

NOTE: This chart illustrates the relative increasB in motot vehicles compared to drivers and the<br />

relative population, In 1 957 there were two vehicles for every 5 persons in the United<br />

StatesandmorethanEdriversforevery4vehicles, Inl9TTtherewere2vehiclesfor<br />

every 3 persons and more vehicles than drivers.<br />

Figure A-10. Trend ln Rallos ol Registerod Vehicles to Drivers<br />

and Population, 1957-1977


Table A-6. Types ol Motor Vehicles Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1g75-tgz6<br />

Type of Vshicla<br />

Passenger<br />

Car<br />

Motorcycle<br />

Commercial Bus<br />

School Bus<br />

Single-Unit Truck<br />

Pickup and Van<br />

Other S.U. Truck<br />

Multi-Unit Truck<br />

Other<br />

Percent of All<br />

Vehidor Regirtered<br />

Percent of All Vehicles<br />

in Fatal Accidsnti<br />

1975 1976 1 S75 1 976<br />

77.4<br />

3.6<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

17.9<br />

0.8<br />

76.9<br />

SOURCE: Accident dats: NHTSA Fat8l Accident Reporting Syrtem<br />

Rdgi$trstion dStE; BEsd on preliminary 6stim6t6s frofl the Federal Highway Administrstion<br />

NOTE: Motorcycles and heavy trucks Ere over'represented in fatal accidents. The weight of truckr maket<br />

them e$pecially lethal in highwEy Eccidents while motorcyctists Ere extremely vulnerablo to iniury.<br />

3.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

':u<br />

0.8<br />

69.0<br />

5.9<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

1s.6<br />

fi 3.7)<br />

(1.e)<br />

5.2<br />

3.7<br />

67.4<br />

6.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

r6.8<br />

( r 4.8)<br />

(2.0)<br />

Tabfe 47. Compdeon of Number of Mll€B Tr:awled Annually by Type ol Vehicle, 1975-f 976<br />

Typr of Vrhicls<br />

Passenger Cars<br />

Motorcycles<br />

Commercial Buses<br />

School Buses<br />

Single-Unit Trucks<br />

Multi-Unit Trucks<br />

All Motor Vehicles<br />

'Millions of whicl6 firil6s.<br />

6.1<br />

3.2<br />

Total Travel* Average Annual Travel Per Vehicle<br />

ts75 1976 % Change 1975 1976 % Change<br />

1,028,121<br />

22,351<br />

?.648<br />

2,500<br />

218,894<br />

55,560<br />

1,330.074<br />

r,074,000<br />

22,452<br />

?.899<br />

2,862<br />

247,895<br />

59,055<br />

I,40S, r 63<br />

SOURCE; Federal Highway Adminidtration lPreliminarv Ectimates).<br />

+4,46<br />

+0.45<br />

+9.48<br />

+14.48<br />

+13.25<br />

+6.29<br />

+S,95<br />

9,634<br />

4,500<br />

28,230<br />

6,788<br />

8.882<br />

49,1?5<br />

9.644<br />

9,733<br />

4,500<br />

29,948<br />

7,502<br />

9,355<br />

48,366<br />

9,81 7<br />

+1,02<br />

+6.09<br />

+ 10.52<br />

NOTE: Except for motorcycles and multi-unit trucks, the average travel per vehicle has increased. The growth in the<br />

number of vehicles has resulted in sn almost six percent increase in total mile$ traveled.<br />

+5,33<br />

- 1.55<br />

+1<br />

.79<br />

A-19


A-20<br />

Vehilcle Miles (hillionsl<br />

- 1600<br />

- 1400<br />

-1200<br />

- t0o0<br />

- 80o<br />

- 600<br />

- 400<br />

- 200<br />

Rural - -'<br />

SOUFICF: Federal Highway Administration,<br />

NOTE: tn recent years, travel in urban areas has been increasing slightly faster than travel in rur€l<br />

areas" This is due primarily to increased local and municipal road mileage caused by suburban<br />

development.<br />

There has been a steady increase in vehicle miles traveled except in 1974.<br />

Ffgure A.11. Total Motor Vehicle Travel, 1gi7-1gll


VehicleMiles (billions)<br />

-1600<br />

- 1400<br />

- 1?00<br />

- 10oo<br />

- 600<br />

- 400<br />

Fural l-l<br />

Urban<br />

[-l<br />

1 97 1 1972<br />

$OURCE: Federal Highway Administration,<br />

Totat Eil<br />

1 973 1 974 1 975 1 976<br />

Figure A.12. Motor Vehicle Travel on All Highway $ystems, 1g7i-i9Z6


A-22<br />

Vehicle Miles (billions)<br />

- 250'-* Rural fl Urban<br />

filn Total W<br />

- 200<br />

- 150<br />

- 100<br />

-_50<br />

1971 1972 I 973 1574 1 975 1 976<br />

SOURCE: Federal Highway Administration.<br />

NOTE: Interstate Highway System is synonymou$ with the Federal Highway Administration<br />

categories Interstete (,Arterial) and Interstate (finat).<br />

Figure A-13. Motor Vehicle Travel on. the Inler$tate Highway System, 1971-1976<br />

Vehicle Miles (billions)<br />

-1zoo Rural l-l Urban ffiil,'ll Total<br />

SOURCE: Federal Highway Administretion'<br />

Figure A-14. Motor Vehicle Travel on Non-lnterstate Highway Systems, 1971-1976


Speed (mph)<br />

-58<br />

_56<br />

1960 1965 1 970 1 975 1 980<br />

$OURCE; Computed from data supplied by the Federal Highwey Admlnlstration.<br />

NOTE: Over the 1 O years from 1963-73, the average speed of vehicles on the rural IntBrstate<br />

System increa$ed more than I percent. A corresponding increase in crash speeds<br />

occurred. This has been a significant factor in the rise in highway deaths, because<br />

high crash speeds increase the chance that a fatality will occur. ln 1974 the average<br />

speed dropped 1 1 percent balow that of 1 973. During this same period, traffic<br />

fatalities dropped 1 6 percent. Since 1 975. the average speed has increased slightly<br />

but it is still well below the 1973 average speed.<br />

Flgure A-15. Average Free.Movlng Travel Speed on the Rural Interstate System, 1960-1977<br />

A-23<br />

I )<br />

;<br />

' l


E o<br />

FJ<br />

ctr<br />

I<br />

CD<br />

ctt<br />

ci<br />

=<br />

e<br />

(5<br />

o<br />

rto<br />

>'P<br />

.ct -^<br />

o<br />

o<br />

tt ooE0t<br />

.g<br />

d<br />

-t<br />

g .El<br />

(E<br />

F<br />

A-24<br />

uol<br />

>tD<br />

o<br />

E b<br />

g (l,<br />

o<br />

€<br />

gl<br />

rr.,<br />

b<br />

ro<br />

t<br />

lo<br />

c<br />

rjt<br />

qr<br />

Ef<br />

ro<br />

rt<br />

+<br />

t<br />

+<br />

6r<br />

(et<br />

b<br />

o<br />

rl<br />

fq<br />

Q<br />

aYt<br />

ot<br />

t.f,<br />

+<br />

o<br />

CE<br />

u A C<br />

= N<br />

l<br />

+ff<br />

P rolR ,f,:€ flH ;H RH gs<br />

Rq tf, Ec E'r? B- S6? Fio N:l N:, m-: q<br />

;'i ;'P ['o f,'o o'o ;'co ;'co o'cc o'r cl'r 9' -<br />

fis Hs FH frS ES Hd H* s* EH P* 3S<br />

EE:.E:.; E;; =-H 3-;3-;:.;:.;:-; r-o<br />

HE HS Hd EF otEE |:ER *EE flH<br />

=? si B= H: 5.: u.* Hi_= ii.= SS u.= E* ii.: ES o.d'o,<br />

o(}) d'o) d's c|'ot -',, oi= Fi= o= +H nts<br />

HE H{ E+ ;$ F$ E$ Hi! Hi; F$ HH Hf<br />

:'9 -. = i'= fi'= i.''<br />

= i'= ;'l . l ."'l r : e':<br />

*Be PEe Hle Hre Pf =+* PEe 8S SH 3H frH<br />

H+ Ht H": Hc] F,i.: H.: :.: id-H d,H iH [";<br />

;3 ;': o'I


Total Licensed Drivers - 137,901,000<br />

9 9 6 , r t A q o r E o r v g ) o )<br />

C { C \ r f \ r c ' l f / ) S S r o r l t t p ( b 6<br />

h 9 r 5 l + r 5 - r o r r , d $ , d d r * ;<br />

d $ l ( \ l c ' r C ' ) + = l r l t f l ( D o g<br />

€ o<br />

Age Group<br />

Figure A-16. Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977<br />

A.25


A-26<br />

-80<br />

-60<br />

-40<br />

-20<br />

Percent<br />

o r f c D t o r r q l<br />

(\/ (\t o{ (Y, cc tl<br />

- L d , i r d , i a<br />

t $ r ( \ r ( Y ) f i l t<br />

f<br />

o ) E t o r t 6 ,<br />

q r I ) t . f ) ( o ( o<br />

u 5 d u 5 o r r )<br />

!l ro ro (o (o<br />

Age Group<br />

o)<br />

( o j j<br />

r O<br />

6J t-<br />

NOTE: Change in the age distribution of licensed drivers is an important element of the highway<br />

safety problem. In recent years, the lergest increases have occurred in those ege groups<br />

where accident rates have been higher than average,<br />

During the period there wa$ I v6ry large increase (1O2 percent) in the number of licenses<br />

issued to women over 59" This is believed to reflect the tremendous increase in driving by<br />

women that took place between World War I and World War ll. In the decade from 1967<br />

to 1977,the young licensed drivers (under 30) and the old (over 59) increased much more<br />

rapidly than those in the middle group (30 to 59), The increase was 50 percent in the<br />

under-3O group and 58 percent in the over-S9 group, but only 19 percont in the 30-59<br />

group. There was an increase of 49 percent in the number of license$ issuod to female<br />

drivers, but only 23 percent in the number of licenses issued to male drivers, As a result,<br />

in the eleven Vaer period, the estimated ratio of male to female drivers declined {rom<br />

3:2 to 7:6.<br />

Figure A.17. Percent Increase In Licensed Drivers by Age Group, 1967-1977


.E (E<br />

E<br />

rJ<br />

h<br />

g,<br />

I<br />

(E'<br />

ct)<br />

d,<br />

=<br />

e<br />

ct<br />

o<br />

,9^<br />

r{O<br />

-o<br />

-6:o^<br />

gE<br />

o<br />

t<br />

o<br />

.Et<br />

o,<br />

o<br />

E<br />

.g<br />

J<br />

oi<br />

t gIl(E<br />

E<br />

Se<br />

o<br />

gt<br />

I E<br />

T<br />

(o<br />

(''<br />

r+<br />

ro<br />

ro<br />

ri<br />

ur<br />

o<br />

ut<br />

ol<br />

T<br />

6<br />

qt<br />

ch<br />

FJ<br />

ln<br />

rf<br />

o<br />

fil<br />

CE<br />

ul<br />

ER<br />

4ffr<br />

aH<br />

o.<br />

l<br />

9, r.<br />

6fi<br />

rrt ><br />

(J<br />

{<br />

HS EH H$ HS HE H* 3H sx R4 Rs 8S<br />

.yi ' Fi,r' ci,', nr; 3'; H-; B; ;-; T'; :-:; se<br />

.d<br />

E+ E* HS Efi Hfi H# E$ EE H€ Hfi E{<br />

N- $<br />

c\j'+ Fa'$ 6i +<br />

N'f N't fl)-


- 15<br />

*10<br />

-60<br />

.-40<br />

+20<br />

- _20<br />

O<br />

rr<br />

S O<br />

(\l<br />

) r<br />

e.t<br />

f<br />

ff)<br />

h<br />

i<br />

o (\l .<br />

(\<br />

b d<br />

or)<br />

o ) f<br />

o ? T<br />

t < r q<br />

f f J q<br />

Male Licensed Drivers - 74,195,000<br />

6,


g<br />

IE<br />

E<br />

o<br />

l|.<br />

FJ<br />

gt<br />

I<br />

CD<br />

ctt<br />

d<br />

=<br />

g<br />

(5<br />

o Eta<br />


- 15<br />

-10<br />

o s 6 j q c ' r<br />

f t + c r T q<br />

! o r . ( ' o l . c t<br />

g N 6 r c D c r )<br />

U '<br />

f<br />

Female Licensed Drivers * 63,706,000<br />

.S oJ rt oJ<br />

9 T + P<br />

o r r J o r . c ,<br />

t q f r . c ' l f )<br />

Age Group<br />

+ o )<br />

(o (s<br />

( ) t r ,<br />

(o (o<br />

Figure A'20. Distribution of Female Llcensed Drivers by Age Group, 1977


R S S S B S + S E 3 E 3 E<br />

h o l f r o 1 6 o t o c t u . r o r f r * . b<br />

f i e . r e . r f r < ' + + r b r r i 6 d g F<br />

c o<br />

f<br />

Age GrouP<br />

Figure A-21. Percent Incr€asa In Female Licensed Drlvers by Age Group, 1S67-1972


Table A-11. Percent Distributlon, By Age, of Drlvers Involved in Fatal Accldents, 19?<br />

Type of Accident<br />

Licensed Drivers<br />

All Fatal Accidents<br />

Single Vehicle:<br />

Overturn in Road<br />

Other Non"collision<br />

Collision w/f ixed Obiect<br />

Multi-Veh icle:<br />

Rear ertd<br />

Head on<br />

Angle<br />

Sideswipe<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Pedalcyclist<br />

Under<br />

20<br />

8,9<br />

18.10<br />

23.81<br />

20.22<br />

?3,48<br />

12.S8<br />

16.43<br />

16.13<br />

16.57<br />

16.67<br />

19.77<br />

Age of Driver<br />

20-?4 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />

13.6<br />

21.43<br />

25.51<br />

22.O4<br />

?5.92<br />

18.r9<br />

20.04<br />

19.24<br />

20.33<br />

20.77<br />

19.77<br />

24.0<br />

23.8S<br />

?4.44<br />

24.t1<br />

22.47<br />

25.48<br />

24.92<br />

22.a8<br />

25.37<br />

26.21<br />

24.52<br />

16.6<br />

1?.80<br />

10.57<br />

13.48<br />

10.15<br />

16,15<br />

13.92<br />

12 94<br />

13.18<br />

13.91<br />

13.74<br />

SOUFCE: Estimated f rom the N HTSA Fatal ,4 ccident Reporting System (FARS)'<br />

14.9<br />

10.01<br />

8.36<br />

9.r1<br />

7.72<br />

12.84<br />

10.73<br />

10 68<br />

11 .17<br />

10.36<br />

10.01<br />

12.3<br />

7.15<br />

4.31<br />

6.19<br />

5.60<br />

8,52<br />

7.87<br />

8.24<br />

7.36<br />

6.88<br />

7.83<br />

NOTE: Drivers under 25 are over.involved in all types of accidents, compared to the total number of<br />

licensed drivers in thar age group. The over-involvement is greatest for single-vehicle accidents,<br />

especially collision with fixed object, overturrted in road and other nontollision. Both male<br />

and female drivers in this age group show the same pattern of over'representdtion Drivers in<br />

age group 35-64 are generally in fewer accidents than would be cxpected on the basis of their<br />

numbers. Drivers over 64 show a mixed pattern. with an over-representation of females and<br />

under-represenlalion of males.<br />

Over<br />

64<br />

9.9<br />

6.37<br />

2.73<br />

2.13<br />

4.36<br />

5.55<br />

5.95<br />

10.49<br />

5.66<br />

4.92<br />

4.24


Type of Accident<br />

Licensed Drivers<br />

All Fatal Accidents<br />

Single Vehicle:<br />

Overturn in Road<br />

Other Non-collision<br />

Coll ision w / lixed Object<br />

Multi-Vehicle;<br />

Rear End<br />

Head On<br />

Angle<br />

Sideswipe<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Pedalcyclist<br />

Table A-12. Percent Distrlbution, By Age, of Male Drlvers<br />

Involved in Fatal Accidents, 1977<br />

Under<br />

?o<br />

9.1<br />

18.08<br />

22.90<br />

20.31<br />

23,65<br />

12.67<br />

16.26<br />

16.36<br />

16.16<br />

16.42<br />

r 9.87<br />

Age of Driver<br />

20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />

13,4<br />

21.99<br />

26.30<br />

?2.SS<br />

26.62<br />

18.67<br />

20.65<br />

19.83<br />

1 9.76<br />

20.57<br />

21.32<br />

23.4<br />

24.35<br />

24.60<br />

23.66<br />

22.79<br />

25.71<br />

25.66<br />

22.63<br />

26.97<br />

26.51<br />

24.O7<br />

16.0<br />

12.61<br />

10.60<br />

13.62<br />

9.88<br />

16.13<br />

13.69<br />

12.62<br />

13.30<br />

13.92<br />

13.25<br />

SOURCE; Estimated from the NHTSA Fata! Accident Reporting Wstem (FARfl.<br />

14.8<br />

LC?<br />

8.30<br />

s.38<br />

7.49<br />

12_99<br />

10.50<br />

10.66<br />

11 .44<br />

'10.47<br />

s.85<br />

12.5<br />

6.78<br />

4.33<br />

6.47<br />

5.31<br />

8.20<br />

7.16<br />

7.69<br />

8.71<br />

7.14<br />

7.59<br />

Over<br />

64<br />

I 1.0<br />

6.06<br />

2.6S<br />

2.S0<br />

3.96<br />

5.31<br />

6.97<br />

10.00<br />

8.22<br />

4.82<br />

3.88<br />

A.33


A-34<br />

Table A-13. Percent Distrlbutlon, By Age, of Female Drivers<br />

Involved in Fatal Accidents. 1977<br />

Type of Accident<br />

Licensed Drivers<br />

All Fatal Accidents<br />

Single Vehicle:<br />

Overturn in Road<br />

Other Non-collision<br />

Coll ision w/f ixed Object<br />

Multi-Veh icle;<br />

Rear end<br />

Head on<br />

Angle<br />

Sideswipe<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Peda lcyclist<br />

Undsr<br />

20<br />

8.7<br />

18.20<br />

28.62<br />

19.79<br />

22.50<br />

14,80<br />

17.18<br />

15.29<br />

18.56<br />

17.80<br />

19.38<br />

Age of Driver<br />

20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64<br />

13.8<br />

18.96<br />

21.46<br />

18.75<br />

?1.76<br />

15.30<br />

17.55<br />

17.04<br />

23.05<br />

21.81<br />

13.75<br />

24.8<br />

21.89<br />

23.64<br />

31.25<br />

20.s9<br />

?4.1 I<br />

21.90<br />

20,05<br />

17.66<br />

25.1 6<br />

26.25<br />

16.9<br />

13.65<br />

14.42<br />

r 3.54<br />

11.76<br />

16.28<br />

14.86<br />

14.16<br />

12.57<br />

13.89<br />

15.63<br />

SOURCE: Estimated from the NHTSA Fatal Accident Reporting Systam (FAFfl,<br />

15.1<br />

1Q,44<br />

8.55<br />

8.33<br />

9.12<br />

12.0r<br />

11 .67<br />

10.71<br />

9.88<br />

9.97<br />

r 0.63<br />

12.1<br />

8.S2<br />

4.20<br />

5.21<br />

7.28<br />

10,36<br />

10.83<br />

10.33<br />

10.48<br />

5.87<br />

8.75<br />

Over<br />

64<br />

8.7<br />

7.81<br />

2.95<br />

2,08<br />

6.76<br />

6.91<br />

5.88<br />

12.32<br />

7.78<br />

5.41<br />

5.63


lndustrial Production Index<br />

1967 = 100<br />

- 10o<br />

-90<br />

-80<br />

-50<br />

Traffic Deaths<br />

(thousands)<br />

t l r l l l<br />

1955 1960 r 965 I 970 1 975 1 980<br />

SOURCES; Federal Fleserve Board<br />

Dearhs: 195(}1974, National Center for Health Statistica.<br />

1975 and 1 976, Fatal Accident Reporting System.<br />

NOTE; From 1957 to 1966 the annual changes in highway fatalities have correspondsd closely<br />

with change$ in the Fed€ral Reserv€ Board lndustrial Production Index. Clearly both<br />

trends have many common ceusative factors. Beginning in 1967, however, the rate of<br />

increase in highway deaths has fallen behind that of the Industrial Index, although simi-<br />

' larities in the two trends are still apparent.<br />

Figure A-22. Comparison ol Tralllc Deathe and lndustrlel Productlon Index,<br />

u.s.. 19s7-1977<br />

62-<br />

57-<br />

52-<br />

42-<br />

32-<br />

A-35


A.36<br />

Table A-14. Safety Belt Percent Usage<br />

'197<br />

4-1977 Passenger Cars<br />

Usage by Model Year and Car Size<br />

Size 1S76.1977<br />

Subcompact<br />

Compact<br />

Intermediate<br />

Standard<br />

Luxury<br />

32.8<br />

22.0<br />

17.2<br />

18.1<br />

15.6<br />

Usage by Sex and Age Group<br />

24.9<br />

17.9<br />

14.7<br />

15.0<br />

13.7<br />

Restraint Ueed Male Female 16.24 25'49 Over 50<br />

Lap and Shoulder Belt<br />

Lap Belt Only<br />

Combined Total<br />

11.7<br />

5.6<br />

17.3<br />

11.9<br />

8.7<br />

20.6<br />

't1.7<br />

SOURCE: NHTSA estirflates based on a $urvey in 16 cities during 1977. Data was used only when<br />

vehicle model vear was confirmed by State$'Departments of Motor Vehicles (Contrect<br />

DOT-HS-6-0 1 340) .<br />

NOTE: Safety belt usage ratB has declined steadily from 76% in 1974 model interlock equipped<br />

cars during 1974 to 25o/o in 1977. The usage rate in 1977 model cars is 17a/o, The 1977<br />

survey shows a higher usage rate in smaller cars and among younger drivers.<br />

7.1<br />

18.8<br />

12.7<br />

6.6<br />

19.3<br />

8.3<br />

7.1<br />

15.4


Table A-15. Motor V€hicle Traflic Fatalltiss by Age and Sex<br />

United States, 1976<br />

Age Male Female Total<br />

o- 4<br />

5- I<br />

10- 14<br />

15- 19<br />

2A-24<br />

25-29<br />

30,34<br />

35- 39<br />

40-44<br />

45-49<br />

50- 54<br />

55 59<br />

60-64<br />

65-69<br />

70-74<br />

75 7g<br />

80- 84<br />

85-89<br />

90-94<br />

Over 94<br />

Unknown<br />

Total<br />

712<br />

891<br />

1,056<br />

6,262<br />

6,234<br />

3,782<br />

2,305<br />

1,629<br />

1,449<br />

1,400<br />

1,510<br />

1,?60<br />

1,130<br />

s32<br />

847<br />

t07<br />

515<br />

221<br />

5S<br />

11<br />

126<br />

33,038<br />

539<br />

555<br />

565<br />

2,1 99<br />

1,556<br />

989<br />

651<br />

510<br />

532<br />

529<br />

678<br />

536<br />

576<br />

568<br />

573<br />

469<br />

344<br />

114<br />

31<br />

5<br />

64<br />

1?,481<br />

SOURCE: Fatal Accident Feporting Svstem, NHTSA (30 dav deaths)'<br />

1,251<br />

1,447<br />

1,621<br />

8,461<br />

7,790<br />

4,771<br />

2,956<br />

2,139<br />

1,981<br />

1,929<br />

2,088<br />

1,796<br />

1,706<br />

1,498<br />

1,424<br />

1,1 76<br />

859<br />

335<br />

90<br />

16<br />

r93<br />

45,523<br />

A-37


A.38<br />

rft<br />

o)<br />

ui<br />

o<br />

(g<br />

o<br />

E<br />

o<br />

=<br />

c<br />

=<br />

x<br />

o<br />

a<br />

It<br />

c(E<br />

o Et<br />

{<br />

h<br />

3t<br />

E<br />

au<br />

q)<br />

H<br />

o<br />

o<br />

tn<br />

=<br />

G'<br />

o<br />

tr,<br />

.E<br />

tt<br />

6o<br />

J<br />

trt<br />

t<br />

g Il(E<br />

g G<br />

Eql<br />

g tg<br />

E<br />

E<br />

o<br />

E<br />

lE<br />

o<br />

o<br />

(J<br />

Ee<br />

E<br />

E<br />

s<br />

o<br />

J<br />

tr<br />

.u<br />

EE<br />

ER<br />

-c<br />

G<br />

o<br />

J tG<br />

0c<br />

Ee<br />

E<br />

o<br />

6<br />

o<br />

lg<br />

tr<br />

E<br />

q\qf\'.\14q?<br />

r\ o) o.) (\ (\t F F.l<br />

\lo(\l@cD(D(o<br />

-tr,t.c'dJF\l'll '-<br />

F- C! r'. (f, m .\l cO<br />

(o(OO)@C.'l$lQ<br />

- ( O O F C { F ( \<br />

c v l - F<br />

olq<br />

ct r\<br />

t-t:q<br />

cO€rf(\l<br />

(ort mcrre{F<br />

r'\(o com-t\<br />

C! \f C! Cr C"l (g<br />

r+ C!C!-<br />

t:qt:qf.l-ul<br />

N@(oco(?r(9c\r<br />

( \ l - F<br />

Oqf-COO(oC!<br />

(g


E o5<br />

.E troC)<br />

u)<br />

r',<br />

th<br />

o (E<br />

o<br />

E o<br />

.= E<br />

=<br />

l.i<br />

o<br />

U'<br />

!, tr<br />

F<br />

0)<br />

Er<br />

{ h<br />

-ct<br />

-c<br />

IE<br />

o<br />

o<br />

th o 3<br />

IE<br />

o E,<br />

.E<br />

T'<br />

.E<br />

qt<br />

d<br />

t gII(g<br />

d,<br />

(E<br />

E<br />

o<br />

q'<br />

lE<br />

IE<br />

o<br />

Ee<br />

E<br />

IE<br />

o<br />

J<br />

tr<br />

(E<br />

E<br />

bR<br />

TE<br />

o<br />

J tr<br />

E,<br />

ER<br />

E<br />

€qJ<br />

o<br />

J<br />

o<br />

o)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

sl<br />

=(E<br />

(J<br />

F<br />

EE<br />

$,E<br />

q?-tqo?qqu?<br />

FN=ft.(lfi)fl)-rr1<br />

oln(o$o)r\cr/ot<br />

|f '(Or-=tg)CD=fCO<br />

rf,to(-r-<br />

o?oqrq-<br />

SoC'r|Itot<br />

q<br />

fl)<br />

(ll ctr c,) t$ (\l<br />

(DOFOF q)<br />

qt (o u.) crt |l,<br />

otqfl?-0q c-l<br />

(\OFOm


A40<br />

E (l)<br />

f<br />

E<br />

E<br />

o<br />

()<br />

l.ft<br />

g,<br />

tri<br />

o<br />

(E<br />

o EIo<br />

.=tr<br />

=<br />

x<br />

o<br />

u,<br />

E tr<br />

E<br />

o<br />

ED<br />

{ >r<br />

Il<br />

t<br />

ag<br />

o<br />

6<br />

o<br />

u,<br />

o<br />

ID<br />

f<br />

ag<br />

o<br />

ED<br />

.E<br />

EI<br />

(E<br />

o<br />

d<br />

t<br />

.g<br />

.ct<br />

TE<br />

F<br />

g E<br />

F<br />

al,<br />

II<br />

g €<br />

E<br />

o<br />

€<br />

q)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

|E<br />

(J<br />

Ee<br />

it)<br />

o<br />

J<br />

tr (E<br />

E<br />

ES<br />

F<br />

G<br />

(lJ<br />

q<br />

J E.E<br />

cc<br />

be<br />

E<br />

o<br />

I<br />

(g<br />

E<br />

+$<br />

otcDqroo)qt<br />

qC'oroo')t<br />

('o(gCOr\@cc<br />

tfmO)(oF\o<br />

6)rfrr.()(oeco<br />

olu?0qolqu?<br />

cttc)(('(oorr\<br />

c{<br />

GtOrOtI\r.O<br />

@ F ( O F ( O -<br />

tg + =l- tl- (O lr,<br />

J<br />

-o?c!0qu?f!F!ol<br />

tr-tOl$qff\(r)tO<br />

C{-<br />

ortEtOtcfOmFF<br />

tO m =f e oij Cr,t tf) _<br />

ct,o'Jdt$oc(oElro<br />

(\I<br />

Flf)+Ctfil(O NF(Ot$Fl!t -Nlrl$0oC'r(g\t<br />

0q6?\te.loq<br />

(\|FTO(\T(Off)<br />

N F F F<br />

(r)$(?r\|.crtf<br />

OmN-C')d)<br />

co. of (o- .: cA (o<br />

(rt c! c\,1 c,,l -<br />

olol 6lea?tq<br />

!om$ctFco<br />

F - t s<br />

('r-|Jl)FOF<br />

\ftoOr\orQ<br />

(r,l c"t - OJ |f, N<br />

(\ F e!,1<br />

fl?o?o?q0qeqo?<br />

FF\F-6)CO(g(rl<br />

(ocOu)(Oe{Ef(Qt<br />

otorlcoorr\o)o,<br />

\\m.\'.cr,N.o) +<br />

F f { - F F F<br />

- (\ (r) + ljl (O Fr.o(1 cDtt(o +F(\|aYtro(c|r\m<br />

q'qq-c?orJl+c\r@rf<br />

6tQ-


tt of<br />

.E Eo<br />

()<br />

lJ)<br />

ctt<br />

st<br />

o<br />

(E<br />

a<br />

T'<br />

o<br />

.=<br />

tr<br />

f<br />

'i<br />

(l'<br />

a<br />

E<br />

e(E<br />

o Er<br />

t\<br />

.a E(g<br />

o<br />

o<br />

ah<br />

o<br />

.1,<br />

=<br />

o<br />

Et<br />

.E<br />

T'<br />

.E<br />

o<br />

d<br />

{ o<br />

.cI<br />

(q<br />

(lI<br />

.E<br />

E o<br />

lt<br />

g a<br />

E<br />

o o<br />

bA<br />

s (!t<br />

ilt<br />

6<br />

.ts<br />

g(!<br />

0c<br />

toqul-Qo?=t:<br />

rt(\rs(oro({t(o<br />

P cr,<br />

l\C\Jc'OFCPCO<br />

cOrfFCDe{$l(O<br />

orst(ocoF!oe<br />

-+<br />

(\rFctr\tFlolI '<br />

FCDrO(oc"(')N<br />

-(Y]<br />

lftFOoror(or\<br />

t\llfrF-FCOr\Et<br />

CO =f crj + (O r\ llt<br />

foco-J<br />

cQrQqen?\<br />

- 6, F'f C'\1 (\ -<br />

(\ e.)<br />

o+$)r..cocotr<br />

Cf, C.,l In O r\ m CO<br />

dr(\rc4(oFf\rlll<br />

r-.eiG/J<br />

(\|F(0.+ttrFfo (\,lF+(''(Ol(,F c\l-(9Et(otr)gt<br />

ER u?a?rqq|4D<br />

mroco(o|.olltco<br />

Crl -<br />

s IEOJ<br />

o<br />

J<br />

cc<br />

EF<br />

q)<br />

g<br />

J<br />

.E<br />

o<br />

8t<br />

a ()<br />

IE<br />

CE<br />

f;'S<br />

F l*- c! CD S CD r''<br />

oor.crcoroff(e<br />

|J)- ro, co_ r$, rD. q €<br />

( J f c . ) - F F F<br />

qqu?0qq-0q<br />

roQ(crfl)|n


T'<br />

(lt<br />

3<br />

.E tro<br />

O<br />

rO<br />

€tt<br />

.ti<br />

o<br />

$<br />

v,<br />

E o<br />

.= tr<br />

f<br />

x<br />

o<br />

q<br />

E Etg<br />

o<br />

El<br />

{<br />

>r<br />

.cl<br />

-tr<br />

(g<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

0t<br />

of<br />

E<br />

o Et<br />

.E<br />

E (q<br />

(lt<br />

d<br />

+ g€(E<br />

o<br />

.E<br />

eo<br />

lt<br />

$<br />

E<br />

G<br />

o<br />

4<br />

E<br />

o<br />

o<br />

(l,<br />

=<br />

I<br />

s<br />

6<br />

o<br />

cl<br />

J<br />

tr<br />

t!<br />

CE<br />

Ee<br />

-tr<br />

.E<br />

$<br />

o<br />

ld<br />

(lt<br />

E<br />

s<br />

.E<br />

o<br />

'jl<br />

tr<br />

E<br />

sE<br />

ultc!\qqq<br />

(Ol-Ffl)r(\-<br />

(\ (f,<br />

OrgtCOr-O+$<br />

Otrlr\Oel()<br />

OOC{(OCO_(O<br />

NF*O/)-<br />

orN qqo?qqqc<br />

(\tDFN(v)-co<br />

fl)<br />

rto<br />

qf|Ji<br />

ffiro<br />

ol ol<br />

r\OffU)Fh(O<br />

(OF<br />

O (9 OJ r\ N cP C\l C'.t (9<br />

ctt, N. \ to. oq cO CO F Lll<br />

6 J o E l F F<br />

F S I<br />

NF(v)ql'r\tOgt (o({ (\rcDt()rt@o) (o({<br />

gr@mO19'qfgr (v)tl,<br />

- ! f t t d f U e e<br />

+(\r<br />

F F<br />

6rr{OOTOTSF<br />

(\OC!OC'{(Y)F<br />

OFOtf.,l--tf)<br />

S(rt<br />

OrF<br />

Ot{l<br />

+OCD(5fiI<br />

(v) e{<br />

--<br />

*N(n!l|J)F(Ct<br />

qqtola?oq\<br />

(0o,tOfl)(''l--<br />

(r) N<br />

mto@(odtN-<br />

(\|o<br />

F F<br />

tqrqtqu?tT<br />

$l ljt l$ CC - C{ fil<br />

t C*l<br />

qq<br />

r,l)o:rFFr\or\<br />

eDro(oNqt(oo<br />

cq-\af.t-qqtq-<br />

(vrs<br />

lo


E o=<br />

.Etr<br />

o<br />

g rr)<br />

g)<br />

st<br />

o<br />

.E<br />

6<br />

E.= E<br />

=<br />

ri<br />

o<br />

U'<br />

It tr<br />

(E<br />

o<br />

ctl<br />

>*<br />

.cI<br />

.E<br />

E<br />

o<br />

6<br />

o<br />

o<br />

a<br />

=rg<br />

o<br />

El<br />

.E<br />

T'<br />

(E<br />

0)<br />

at<br />

.i<br />

g<br />

E F<br />

-g (E<br />

tr<br />

o<br />

s lE<br />

IE<br />

o<br />

€ lgs<br />

g<br />

o<br />

t0<br />

o<br />

#<br />

E<br />

o<br />

J<br />

E<br />

ES<br />

E<br />

.q<br />

0,<br />

g<br />

J<br />

E (E<br />

IE<br />

Ee<br />

t<br />

E<br />

o<br />

T EIE<br />

TE<br />

sg<br />

n-ol-qe!qu?q<br />

c|) c{<br />

l\COoltfl)-e-- N<br />

qt<br />

oo@@toe!mlf)<br />

fll (fJ (O CD rr LO<br />

(o{'<br />

(lf r\<br />

c\r_o)-\qoJrya(o<br />

r+ (D<br />

toln<br />

O)-l'-c\J<br />

c{ c{<br />

FF<br />

c\qu?q-<br />

F(\(\t(Y)(\lF<br />

rl c\J -<br />

(?)Or\(Oe!l\<br />

r-lncfr(r)Lo$l<br />

(O(\I(fJ+g)F<br />

o c.J cll ct .- F<br />

T C',I F<br />

ctr |\ t0<br />

-(r)F<br />

+tft<br />

m(slfl<br />

-<br />

F(1 (l'tO)(OF- Ir'N FFtcq+to0, (oc\lrt<br />

oqoqqQ'.(?olo?l<br />

(\J Ef r\ - f.,l - - C',1<br />

$c\J<br />

Tf 00<br />

tDOr6r(\l(oO(\- Otql<br />

(Orrf'O=f 6tpFr FCP<br />

t\oD(7t-c\rltoF coo<br />

lf) c! 6t c\ Cq (\l C'{ (\l F F<br />

LO Ce<br />

nolqtq\<br />

C,l C\| Ctt - f.l (\rl<br />

se{<br />

F F<br />

ul c'{ q<br />

otLftr\(oF|f, FcoN<br />

of\(.lLcrNo<br />

grcolf!<br />

q. o. rfr- N- N_ (o_ o. q o<br />

@-NC{(-Jc,) (\l(v)<br />

IOCCF<br />

-C',1 (Qm\iF(olO Otl e c.,r (vl F ro cl cD (o rf<br />

ocqc'!f?qoq0qq<br />

O(omCrrc{FFF<br />

lfe!<br />

qe<br />

g'r5'rrO-C.'lQ(O LOCp<br />

COF*(\tt+(\rf m6, Orq<br />

oJ-c\r,a\ryF-(o-c'),<br />

(F{@.<br />

ti.qr\+$cv)cqet<br />

({)r<br />

Cotr,-<br />

e!0q\cf!q ryqq<br />

NNON(\I(\<br />

c\J r.c, 6, Fl (fJ c{<br />

CO N (\ O, r\ Cs)<br />

to.cc-olq--\<br />

@ - or<br />

or) fD Or<br />

ol.\nt<br />

co(v)+|J)lfr$<br />

Ol U) Cn<br />

(Y)(9e<br />

F(\lc')!i.u)(oF@ gt frl F C',1 (Y) + lro (o f\ @ tl<br />

^r 6 . P<br />

z<br />

Eg - ur<br />

E6 B E g<br />

F -<br />

@ O . \<br />

(Jql P = X<br />

;fr .V g E<br />

F q J , =<br />

E,e (J uJ<br />

- H O , ^ - L + J<br />

3 E<br />

^lc z<br />

ilP t uJ<br />

z.d 39 0<br />

,q* H G (J<br />

Yts ii: (J<br />

eE fiE<br />

E.g<br />

ul<br />

- 6 0 - l * J<br />

Et - 5 5 o (J<br />

Uo-q.! ;r i<br />

Elt:;t q ; H<br />

Ii ilE: -i x H ur I#ilE=;H-eF<br />

O t s q 1 9 . ' = * 1 5 - )<br />

gFi.F+Fe3?Eg<br />

HstE F:E'sF >F<br />

SEEEEES.FE-g<br />

ctt<br />

?<br />

E<br />

EFiEFEEEf<br />

rt<br />

€<br />

A43<br />

j<br />

'..


T'<br />

oJ<br />

.E<br />

0<br />

o lr'<br />

o)<br />

{i<br />

o<br />

(g<br />

a<br />

It o<br />

!- c=<br />

x<br />

o<br />

tt c(g<br />

o)<br />

Ef<br />

{<br />

ll<br />

16<br />

o<br />

cr<br />

o<br />

o .D<br />

.E<br />

()<br />

E''<br />

E<br />

E (E<br />

o<br />

(o<br />

.t<br />

g<br />

tt (q<br />

0'<br />

IE<br />

E<br />

o<br />

lt<br />

€<br />

E<br />

o<br />

E<br />

E<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

=<br />

E<br />

(J<br />

l t J ) + F t F m<br />

Ee lrFlridc"j<br />

l < r e e<br />

tg<br />

o<br />

6<br />

l.<br />

c<br />

6l<br />

E<br />

oJoDtoFr\to<br />

cooJmororo<br />

(o, tO. (v), oc. (o. O.<br />

c\o@c!of)-<br />

LO Crl -<br />

O,u)+<br />

fl)-€<br />

o) F (\,1<br />

e\t tf, l.f)<br />

C\l<br />

FC\lfitlO!le (oN(r)<br />

EF -hqc,?eqq<br />

(Y} Or F (fl - c-,1<br />

E<br />

IE<br />

q,<br />

g<br />

Jd crU<br />

E<br />

be<br />

E<br />

|q<br />

o<br />

lg<br />

tr<br />

(9<br />

E<br />

$E<br />

F F<br />

rO-1$<br />

- t"l<br />

-COCtl+-Ot FOrF<br />

Fd(frmff)r\ FOI\<br />

O,trl-co_e..l.-eo, o,.\F<br />

(olfr+sc{e/) Fc{<br />

LOc\lF<br />

rfOONg)IOF(\'|<br />

(o @ or) co (\t (\<br />

I T F F<br />

C{C')Cr)(y)r\F(O{'<br />


t0, :<br />

tr<br />

tr<br />

o<br />

l{t<br />

ot<br />

ui<br />

o (E<br />

o tt<br />

,EE<br />

=<br />

ri<br />

o<br />

q<br />

It<br />

cF<br />

g'<br />

tr)<br />

{ >r<br />

tt<br />

ct<br />

g'<br />

o<br />

o<br />

a o,<br />

of<br />

ag<br />

(J<br />

E,<br />

.E<br />

E Gl<br />

o<br />

d<br />

4 0)<br />

It TE<br />

F<br />

o G<br />

tr<br />

{)<br />

II<br />

g at<br />

E<br />

E<br />

t<br />

€<br />

o<br />

6<br />

o<br />

o<br />

f<br />

|a<br />

C)<br />

Be<br />

o<br />

J<br />

E<br />

IE<br />

E.<br />

Ee<br />

E<br />

.E<br />

(|,<br />

o<br />

J<br />

tr<br />

(E<br />

E<br />

Ee<br />

arl<br />

OJ<br />

6<br />

J<br />

6<br />

E<br />

sE<br />

ln<br />

e0qqolcq-q<br />

ocD(otnrtN<br />

u)F<br />

6re


A46<br />

Table A-17. Fatality Rates lor the United States and Selected Foeign Countries,<br />

1975<br />

Gountry<br />

Belgium<br />

Canada<br />

Finland (1974)<br />

Germany<br />

Netherlands<br />

Norway<br />

Spain<br />

$weden<br />

United States<br />

Fatalities per<br />

100,000 Population<br />

23.9<br />

26.6<br />

18.4<br />

24.1<br />

17.0<br />

13.4<br />

16.4<br />

14.3<br />

20.s<br />

SOURCE: European Conference of Mini$ers of Transport.<br />

Fatalities per<br />

100.000 Passenger Cars<br />

89<br />

72<br />

s0<br />

83<br />

69<br />

58<br />

t28<br />

43<br />

43<br />

Fatalities per<br />

100 Million Vehicle-<br />

Kilometers<br />

(Passenger Cars)<br />

8.5<br />

3.5<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.6<br />

14.0<br />

3.0<br />

3.0


Appendix B<br />

The National<br />

Motor Vehicle Safety<br />

Advisory Gouncil<br />

1977 Membership


NATIONAL MOTOH VEHICLE SAFETY ADVISOHY COUNCIL<br />

1977 MEMBERSHIP<br />

Mr. William T. Birge<br />

Vice Presid en t -Engineerin E<br />

Automotive Control Systems Group<br />

The Bendix Corporation<br />

401 Bendix Drive<br />

South Bend, lndiana 46602<br />

Dr. B. J. Campbell<br />

Director, Highway Safety Research Center<br />

University of North Carolina<br />

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514<br />

Mrs. Julie Candler<br />

Automobile Editor<br />

WOMAN'S DAY Magazine<br />

430 North Woodward<br />

Birmingham, Michigan 4801 I<br />

tMr. Gilbert E. Carmichael<br />

President, The Carriage House<br />

P.O. Box 5673<br />

Meridian, Mississippi 3930I<br />

Mr. H. David Crowther<br />

Director, Public Relations<br />

Lockheed-California Company<br />

P.O. Box 55I<br />

Burbank, California 91520<br />

+Dr. Harold Allen Fenner, Jr.<br />

Department of Orthopedic Surgery<br />

Norte Vista Medical Center, Ltd.<br />

2410 North Fowler Streer<br />

Hobbs, New Mexico 88240<br />

*Mr. Donald L. Gibson<br />

Deputy Chief<br />

California Highway Patrol .<br />

P.O. Box 898<br />

Sacramento. California 95991<br />

+Mr. Joel K. Gustafson<br />

Custafson, Caldwell, Stephens & Ferris P.A.<br />

l4l5 E. Sunrise Boulevard<br />

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304<br />

Dr. Henry A. Hill<br />

President, Riverside Research Laboratory, Inc.<br />

300 Neck Road<br />

Haverhill, Massachusetts 01830<br />

Dr. Don L. Ivey<br />

Director, Highway Safety Research Center-Texas<br />

Transportation Inst.<br />

Texas A&M<br />

College Station, Texas 77843<br />

Mr. Warren E. Jackson<br />

Vice President & Director of Engineering<br />

The Travelers Insurance Companies<br />

I Tower Square<br />

Hartford. Connecticut 061 15<br />

Mr. Robert D. Knoll<br />

Chief. Auto Test Center<br />

Consumers Union<br />

367 Boston Post Road<br />

Orange, Connecticut 06477<br />

'Mr. Louis C. Lundstrom<br />

Executive Director<br />

Environmental Activities Staff<br />

Ceneral Motors Corporation<br />

Detroit, Michigan 48202<br />

Mr. Robert L. McCaffrey<br />

Assistant to the President<br />

Truck Division<br />

International Harvester<br />

401 North Michigan Avenue<br />

Chicago, lllinois 6061 I


Mr. Henry J. Nave<br />

Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer<br />

Mack Trucks, Inc.<br />

P.O. Box M<br />

Allentown, PennsYlvania 18105<br />

Mr. George Nield<br />

Technical Consultant, Automobile Importers of<br />

America<br />

900 lTth Street, N.W.<br />

Washington, D.C. 20006<br />

Mr. John W. Noettl<br />

Director, MembershiP Services<br />

Automobile Club of Missouri<br />

201 Progress ParkwaY<br />

Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043<br />

Mr. Arthur R. Railton<br />

Former Vice President, Corporate Relations<br />

Volkswagen of America, Inc.<br />

South Summer Street<br />

Edgartown, Massachusetts 02539<br />

Mr. Archie G. Richardson, Jr.<br />

President. Automobile Owners Action Council<br />

l4ll K Strcet, N.W.*Suite 8m0<br />

Washington, D.C. 20005<br />

Mr. Cene Robetts<br />

Commissioner, Fire and Police Department<br />

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402<br />

Dr. Kenneth J. Saczalski<br />

Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering<br />

Northern Arieona University<br />

Flagstaff, Arizona 86001<br />

+Mr. Gordon M. Scherer<br />

Attorney at Law<br />

Cors, Hair & Hartsock<br />

l7l7 Carew Tower<br />

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202<br />

LECEND;<br />

E-4<br />

rChrysler/Mercedes<br />

DealershiP<br />

rMembers of the Truck and Bus Safety Subcommittee.<br />

rDr. Basil Y. Scott<br />

Deputy Commissioner for Administration<br />

New York Department of Motor Vehicles<br />

Empire State Plaza<br />

Albany, New York 12228<br />

*Mr. Herbert D. Smith<br />

Former Vice President<br />

Uniroyal, Inc.<br />

l4O Bingham Avenue<br />

Rumson. New Jersey 07760<br />

Mr, J, W. Stevens<br />

Member, Broward County Board of Commissionerg<br />

201 S.E. 6th Street<br />

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301<br />

*Mr. BerkleY C. Sweet<br />

President, Truck Body and Equipment Association<br />

5530 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.<br />

Washington, D.C. 20015<br />

'Mr. Martin D. Walker<br />

Executive Vice President<br />

Automotive OPerations<br />

Rockwell International Corporation<br />

2135 West Maple Road<br />

Troy, Michigan 48084<br />

Dr. Julian A. Waller<br />

Chairman, Department of Epidemiology &<br />

Environmental Health<br />

University of Vermont<br />

Burlington, Vermont 054O1<br />

Mr. Don A. Wilson<br />

Distribution SYstems Manager<br />

The Southland CorPoration<br />

Box 719<br />

Dallas, Texas 75221<br />

rDr. Ruth E. Winkler<br />

Optometrist<br />

lE72 East 15th Street<br />

Tulsa. Oklahoma 74104


Traffic and Motor VehiclE<br />

Safety Programs<br />

Authorization<br />

I<br />

Appropri ation<br />

Automotive Fuel<br />

EcorromV and Coniumef<br />

Inf ormation?<br />

Authorirdtion<br />

Appropriation<br />

Highway Safety Besearch End<br />

Development Programl<br />

Authorization<br />

J<br />

Appropriation<br />

Compliance Test FEcility<br />

Autlrorizationl<br />

Atrpfopriation<br />

Toral Traffic and H iqhway<br />

Safety Appropriation<br />

Authori?ation<br />

Appropriat ion?<br />

State and Community<br />

Safety Aopropriation<br />

Au th or ization<br />

( | ncentives)<br />

Qbl igati ons:<br />

NHTSA<br />

(l ncenrives)<br />

FHWA<br />

Table C-l. Summary ol Authorization and Appropriatlon<br />

Fiscal Years 1967-1978 (Millions of Dollars)<br />

FY 67 FY 68 FY 60 FY 70 FY 7I FY 72 FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76 FY f7 FY 78<br />

r3.9<br />

5.0<br />

10.0<br />

4.3<br />

3.0'<br />

.7<br />

23.9<br />

9.3<br />

67.0<br />

2.0<br />

18.5<br />

12.5<br />

20.0<br />

7 a<br />

l.J-<br />

1.2<br />

38,5<br />

r 9.8<br />

'r 00.0<br />

?5.0<br />

24.1<br />

15.9<br />

25.0<br />

10,6<br />

l.ts<br />

0<br />

49.5<br />

26.5<br />

I O0.0<br />

65.0<br />

23.0<br />

20.2<br />

30.0<br />

10.0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

53.0<br />

30.2<br />

o"<br />

?0.0<br />

40,0<br />

?5.9<br />

37.5<br />

17 .Q<br />

0<br />

0<br />

77.5<br />

42.9<br />

75.0<br />

rAuthorizsd under the NErionrl Traffic ond Motor Vehicle Saletv Act.<br />

?Authorired uilder the Mator Vehicle Inlormation and Cosr Soving$ Act with vnrpecifisd fundin€ lifi;tetion,<br />

lAuthorized undsr thc llighwnv Sefery Act.<br />

4 Lump sum authoritation tq remain avsilabl€ until expended.<br />

5 Femarnrn6 unapprop,io(€d bEtsnce.<br />

6 Funde appropriated f or conilruclion of complisnce teit itritiry withdrtn.<br />

TTheTrFtticand HighwEy Safsty Aporopriotion opprapriates funds lor proorsfri ol both rubrtentive Actr, Fnd th6 Moror VBhicle Conrumer Informarion Program.<br />

sTolsl autho,itdlion of $'|75 million resind6d undor rhe HiqhwEy Setety Act of t9?O-<br />

YFor flsca yeats 1967-1971 otrlrgilionr were incurred in total lor l6 Saf!ty Sl0ndordr. Currenfv, NHfSA has rssponEibility for 14,1/? StFnderds, FHWA for 3.1/? Stsnd€rdr.<br />

'olncludcs auihorizdtiod of $3O.0 millian tor FHWA.<br />

lllncludes nurhoritdtion of 3?5.0 millron tor FHWA ond $37,5 miiliqn lq. incen(ivs drdn(r for NHTSA,<br />

ll Includes authoriztstion ol $30.0 miJlioa fof FHWA and 948 mrilion for incenr;ve qronG tor NHTSA.<br />

lllncludst autho/ire(iorr of $35,0 million for FFIWA rnd $56,6 millian lor inc€ntive granrs for NHTSA,<br />

l4lncludet suthori?otion ot $25.0 million lor FHWA snd $15.0 million lor Incenrrvr qr.nri for NHTSA,<br />

I 5 Includes pey rEis sstimatss ol 91.5 million for FY 1978.<br />

o6<br />

40.0<br />

3Q.7<br />

70.0<br />

38.6<br />

9.6<br />

s.6<br />

1 19.6<br />

78.9<br />

78.0"<br />

67. t<br />

12.9<br />

JO,U<br />

a?n<br />

?3.0<br />

115.0<br />

44.2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

151.9<br />

77.2<br />

l30,o'o<br />

82. I<br />

'| 2.9<br />

30.3<br />

30.3<br />

37.0<br />

15.0<br />

42.5<br />

JO.O<br />

0<br />

g.06<br />

't09.8<br />

75.1<br />

l6?.Et<br />

t<br />

(37, s)<br />

66,8<br />

{.3)<br />

1a t<br />

b5.0<br />

55 1<br />

48.0<br />

7.7<br />

85.0<br />

28. I<br />

0<br />

0<br />

r 58.0<br />

70.9<br />

zo3.ott<br />

(48.0)<br />

85.3<br />

{ 13.4)<br />

14.7<br />

60.0<br />

38.3<br />

7.5<br />

.7<br />

ts5.0<br />

29.0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

68.0<br />

241,5"<br />

(56.51<br />

1 00.9<br />

( r 3.2)<br />

19. I<br />

60.0<br />

41,8<br />

1 1,7<br />

7.4<br />

40,0<br />

?7.1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

76.3<br />

l6?.ot<br />

o<br />

(15.0)<br />

r ?9.0<br />

(15.0)<br />

21.0<br />

00.0<br />

42.A<br />

4.7<br />

10.2<br />

60.0<br />

?6.9<br />

0<br />

0<br />

79.9<br />

t t<br />

1i7.ot'<br />

( r 5.0)<br />

172.Q<br />

(r 5.0)<br />

?8.0<br />

Total 2.O 65.0 70.o 75.0 80.0 95.0 80.0 r 00.0 120.0 r 50.0 200.0<br />

Il'l


c.4<br />

th<br />

.9<br />

.#oo<br />

o-<br />

E<br />

o<br />

E<br />

IE<br />

E<br />

0)<br />

r o<br />

.E<br />

E<br />

t! EO<br />

ra Cll<br />

EhCD<br />

F(O<br />

fi ctt<br />

6E<br />

:(E<br />

!g0,<br />

E><br />

BE<br />

-o.9<br />

]I I!<br />

(t<br />

@<br />

F<br />

I<br />

z o<br />

F<br />

o<br />

.g<br />

I<br />

ci<br />

o g<br />

.Ct<br />

(E<br />

F<br />

6<br />

r<br />

I<br />

@<br />

r<br />

F<br />

E<br />

F<br />

€<br />

E<br />

pu3 rE6A<br />

lsNISV<br />

palPlrdorddV<br />

la6PnE<br />

s,lu6plt6ld<br />

Puf rEEA<br />

lPnlJv<br />

p3ls!/dorddV<br />

re6Png<br />

S,lUdFr$Ard<br />

puf rssl<br />

leucv<br />

p€rE!rdorddV<br />

lE6pn8<br />

s,luop!rard<br />

puf rEeA<br />

lEnlev<br />

pglPr/do/ddV<br />

labpng<br />

s,lu6Pl$trd<br />

PUE JEAA<br />

lenlJv<br />

powrrdoiddV<br />

rs8Png<br />

l,luaplseJd<br />

pu3 rEoA<br />

lEnlsv<br />

pflB!idorddV<br />

rEopnE<br />

*,8,rusP!8ild--_<br />

pu3 rBsA<br />

lEnlJV<br />

pdlElldorddV<br />

lsGpng<br />

6,lu6Pr$6rd<br />

-pur<br />

ru"l<br />

lenlcv<br />

p6rB!rdorddV<br />

la6Png<br />

3,luap!3ard<br />

pul rEel<br />

lPnlcv<br />

paleydorddV<br />

re6Png<br />

s,luspFerd<br />

-p,il<br />

,e"i<br />

|ENOV<br />

peleudorddV<br />

l66Png<br />

E,lu9prEaJd<br />

Puf ,Be<br />

lPnlcv<br />

pEtErrdorddv<br />

refiPng<br />

E,luepFeJd<br />

4 o (a 6 r s s<br />

a € fl<br />

@<br />

a<br />

I @<br />

E<br />

o<br />

o<br />

N<br />

o @<br />

o o<br />

I<br />

o<br />

6<br />

o<br />

@<br />

a<br />

E E<br />

O Y<br />

e B<br />

3'd<br />

6<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

fl<br />

@<br />

r<br />

r<br />

@<br />

4<br />

N<br />

N<br />

@<br />

o<br />

o<br />

@<br />

o r<br />

I<br />

m<br />

E<br />

@<br />

N<br />

N<br />

$<br />

o<br />

N<br />

fl<br />

o<br />

ii<br />

6 o<br />

6<br />

;-<br />

fl @<br />

6<br />

o<br />

o<br />

a<br />

@ 6<br />

I<br />

@<br />

o o<br />

r<br />

3 @<br />

o m o D N<br />

o N<br />

@€<br />

o<br />

o N<br />

N<br />

N<br />

d @<br />

e<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

@<br />

@<br />

@ @ r<br />

@<br />

s<br />

@<br />

@<br />

F<br />

6<br />

@<br />

@<br />

r E<br />

@<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Q<br />

@ N s@<br />

@<br />

@ r<br />

N 6<br />

fl<br />

";<br />

m<br />

-;<br />

;o a g d<br />

I<br />

E<br />

I<br />

€<br />

E<br />

o<br />

e<br />

E<br />

E<br />

F<br />

E<br />

p<br />

s<br />

{<br />

.t<br />

a<br />

{ g<br />

E q<br />

E H<br />

6<br />

o<br />

! E<br />

E<br />

:<br />

@<br />

F<br />

E<br />

E o<br />

.9<br />

E<br />

o<br />

F<br />

;N<br />

F,<br />

@<br />

@<br />

G<br />

F<br />

o<br />

3<br />

.=<br />

c<br />

.9<br />

.!<br />

c<br />

E<br />

;<br />

.9<br />

l<br />

o<br />

E<br />

o<br />

E . C<br />

6 t<br />

_ 4<br />

E 3<br />

9 g


Appendix<br />

D<br />

Publications of the<br />

National Highway<br />

Traffic Safety<br />

Administration


NOTE<br />

This list comprises National Highway'l"raffic Safety Administration<br />

publications publishecl chrring 1977. Titles<br />

are arranged alphabetically and availability or sales in_<br />

formation is provided. Full addresses of sources from<br />

which these publications can be obtai red are given below.<br />

Additional information on the publications of<br />

NHTSA may be obtained from thc Ter:hnical Reference<br />

Branch, Room 5108, 4O0 7th Street, S. W., Washington,<br />

D.C. 20590. Telephone (ZOZ) 426-2768.<br />

Sources:<br />

National Highway Traffic Safety Adn inistration<br />

(NHTSA)<br />

4O0 7th Strcet, S.W.<br />

Washington, D.C. 20590<br />

l. An Activist's Guide for Curbing the Drunk<br />

Driver. Aprll 1977. Limited copies available fiom Gen_<br />

eral Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-902 ll0.<br />

2. Analysis of Angular Misaligr,ment Errors in<br />

Mounting Linear Acceleromelers to ,lnatomical Sub-<br />

"/?c/s. NHTSA Technical Rcporr by ArrLold K. Johnson.<br />

ocrober t977. NTIS. pB-273-561. $5.;:5.<br />

3. Automobile Passiye Restraint Systems, What<br />

They Mean to You. October 1977. Limited copies avail,<br />

able from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />

HS-802 538.<br />

4. Automotive Fuel Economy pntgmm. First An_<br />

nual Report to the Congress. January 1g77. Limited<br />

copies available from General Ser.vices Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT.HS.8OZ I6O.<br />

5. ElJect of Rate of Chan1e of filip on the peak<br />

Braking Coefficient of Passenger Cu Tires. NHTSA<br />

Technical Rcport. August 1977. NTIS. pB-270 934.<br />

$5.25.<br />

6. Emergency Medical Semices Statules, LI.S. State<br />

md Terrilorial Survey. November 197?. Limited copies<br />

available from Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA.<br />

DOT-HS-802 688.<br />

National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />

Department of Commerce<br />

5285 Port Royal Road<br />

Springfield, Virginia 22t 5l<br />

Superintendent<br />

of Documents<br />

U.S. Covernment Printing Office<br />

Washington, D.C. 20402<br />

Prices are subject to change.<br />

For earlier publications, see previous annual report$ flnd<br />

Publications of the National Highway TraJfic SaJeIy<br />

Administration. Iune 1977.<br />

7. Emergency Medical Techniciun Basic Training<br />

Course. For sale by Superintendent of Docurnents:<br />

Title Order No. price<br />

Course Gnlde (Second Edition),<br />

1977.<br />

student studt Guide, 1977.<br />

Inslructor's Lesson plans<br />

(Second Edition), 1977.<br />

050{0340275-3 $t.ln<br />

050-003-00278-0 3.50<br />

050{0340277-l 4.50<br />

8. Emergency Medical Technician paramedic<br />

National Training Course. l9?7. For sale by Supcrintendent<br />

of Documents:<br />

Title<br />

Order No. Price<br />

EMT-Psramedic Course 050-003-00279-8 $2.50<br />

Guide<br />

l5 Modules<br />

sold in sets<br />

(total ser pricc<br />

$4r.90)<br />

Instructor materials:<br />

Module l. The Emergency<br />

Medical Techniciun<br />

050-003-00280_1 1.60<br />

Modufe 2. Hunan Systems<br />

ond palient<br />

Assessmenl 050{03-m28l-0 3.Zs<br />

D-3


Module 3, Shock and Fluid<br />

Therapy<br />

Module 4. General Pharma-<br />

050-003{0282-8 3.00<br />

coloEy<br />

Module 5. RespiratorY<br />

050-003-00283-6 2'75<br />

Svstem 050-003402844 3.25<br />

Module 6. Cardiovascular<br />

System 05040340285-2 3.50<br />

Module 7. Central NerYous<br />

System<br />

050403-00286-1 2'75<br />

Module 8. Soft Tissue<br />

Injuries 050403{02874 3.00<br />

Module 9. Musculoskeletal<br />

System 050-m3-00288-7 2.75<br />

Module 10. Medical Emergencies<br />

050-00340289-5 3.00<br />

Module ll. Obstetric/GYn<br />

Emergencies<br />

Module 12. Pediatrics and<br />

050-m3-00290-9 2.15<br />

Neonatal Trans'<br />

port<br />

Module 13. Emergency Carel<br />

Emotionally<br />

050-003-m291-7 2.50<br />

Disturbed<br />

Module 14. Extrication/Ra-<br />

050403-00292-5 2-50<br />

cue Technique 050'0034m93-3 l'30<br />

Module 15. TelemetrY and<br />

Communicatiow 050-003-00294-l l'50<br />

g. Estimating the Sqfety qffects of the 55 MPH<br />

National Speed Limit. NHTSA Technical Note by Ezio<br />

Cerrelti. June 19?7. Limited copies available from Ceneral<br />

Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 475.<br />

10. An Evaluation of the Highway Safety Program.<br />

A Report to the Congress from the Secretary of<br />

Transportation. July 1977. Limited copies available<br />

from General Services Division, NHTSA. HS-802 4El'<br />

ll. Experimental SaIety Vehicles Intemational<br />

Technical Conference, Report on the Sixth, Washington,<br />

D.C., October 12-15, 1976. 1977' Limited copies<br />

available from General Services Division, NHTSA'<br />

DOT-HS-802 501.<br />

12. Fact Sheets. In format of National Highway<br />

Traffic Safety Administration News Releases. Limited<br />

copies available from Office of Public Affairs and Consumer<br />

Participation, NHTSA:<br />

Brake Fluids. September 1977'<br />

Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 198I-1984<br />

Passenger Cars. June 26, 19'17,<br />

Volkswagen Inte1rated Reseurch Vehicle Accepted for<br />

Testing by Department of Trunsportation's National<br />

Highway Traffic SaJ'ety Administration. June 28'<br />

1977.<br />

13. Fatal Accident Reporting System 1976 Annuul<br />

Report. November 1977. Limited copies available from<br />

General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 60?'<br />

D-4<br />

14. Fstal Accident Reporting System Report for<br />

the First HalI of 1976. March 1977. Limited copies available<br />

from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />

HS-802 384.<br />

75. Fatal Accident Reporting System. Report for<br />

the First Nine Months of 1976. June 1977. Limited<br />

copies available from General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 430.<br />

16. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and<br />

Regulations, with Amendments and Interprelations<br />

Issued through May 1976. March 1977. Looseleaf. For<br />

sale by Superintendent of Documents, by subscription.<br />

No. 050-003-9ffi80-0. $35.00, domestic; $43.75, foreign.<br />

17. 55 MPH Fuct Book. September 1977. Limited<br />

copies available from General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 590.<br />

18. Fuel Econony Imprcvement Through Diacnostic<br />

Inspecfron. NHTSA Technical Report by Ted<br />

Bayler and Leslie Eder. March 1977. NTIS. PB-265 064.<br />

$4.00.<br />

19. FY I97l Implementation of the National Accident<br />

Sampling System. NHTSA Technical Report by<br />

Russell A. Smith, James C. Fell, and Charles J' Kahane'<br />

February 1977. NTIS. PB-265 212. $4.50'<br />

20. Glossary of Terms for Use in Publicutions of<br />

Traffit Safety Pro+raml 1977*. Limited copies available<br />

from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />

HS,802 537.<br />

21 . Hazardous lulaterials-Emergency Action<br />

Galde. January 1977. Superintendent of Documents'<br />

No. 050-003-0025'7 -7 . 52.N.<br />

22. Highway Safety PIan Course' For Use with:<br />

Highway Safety Program Manual, VoL 102- April 1977'<br />

For sale by Superintendent of Documents:<br />

Title<br />

Administrative and Insttzctional<br />

Guide<br />

Participant Materials<br />

Instructor Materials<br />

Order No. Price<br />

050-003-00272-l $1.,t0<br />

050{03-00264{ 250<br />

050-003-00265-8 3.75<br />

23. Highway Safety Programs Standards Implementation<br />

S/afus as oJ'January L977. March 1977. Limited<br />

copies available from General Serviies Division'<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 294.<br />

U. [nternational Matorcycle Safety Conference,<br />

December l6-t7, 1975. Proceedings. March 1977. Limited<br />

copies available from General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 245.<br />

25. MAST Is Saving Lives, an EMS Success Story<br />

in Northeastern New York, Vermont and Northwestern<br />

New Hampshire. 1977+. Limited copies available from<br />

General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 391.<br />

rl9?7 is the year of receipt ofan otherwise undated publication'


26. lufotor Vehiele Diagnostic lrt;trytion Demonstration<br />

Progran Summary Report. NHTSA Tech_<br />

nical Report by Joseph J. Innes and Leslie E. Eder.<br />

October 1977. NTIS. PB-274 j3B. $6.00.<br />

2'7 . Mul tid istiplinary A rcident I n vestiga t ion Sum_<br />

maries. NTIS. (Individual case reporti inclucJed in the<br />

$ummaries are available for inspection in the Technical<br />

Reference Branch of NHTSA, Roorr jlOg, 400 7th<br />

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20S9(D.<br />

VoL No. Date NTIS Araer No. price<br />

7 7 Jan. 1977 pB-264 080 $r3.2s<br />

7 I Jan. t97i pB-Z6i 160 s.zs<br />

7 9 Jan. 1977 pB-264 0Bl s.zs<br />

28. Nationql Highway SqIety Ad,,isory Committee<br />

an Alcohol Safety Adjudicution. Finat Repttrt. Septem_<br />

ber 1977 . Limited copies available fron General Services<br />

Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 il0.<br />

29. The National Maximum Sped Limit, a Sum_<br />

mary of Three Regional Workshops (tonducted bt the<br />

Internstional Assaciation of Chiefs t,f police for the<br />

Department of Transportation. April 1977. Superin_<br />

tendent of Documents. No. 050{03_0)25g_5. $3.25.<br />

32. NHTSA Research Activities, a Report to the<br />

Secrelary of Transportation by the National Motor<br />

Yehicle Safety Advisory Council. Iuly 1977. Limitcd<br />

copies available liom General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS.8Oz 5I6.<br />

33. Ptysr'cs snd Automobile Salbty Betts. lg7i.<br />

Superintendent of Documents. No. )50403402j4-2.<br />

$1.90.<br />

34. Problem ldentification Course. April 1927.<br />

Superintendent<br />

of Documenrs:<br />

Title<br />

Administrative and Instruc-<br />

Qrder No, Pricv<br />

tional Guide<br />

Instrutl0r Materials<br />

Partic ipants Materials<br />

050-mt-02666-6 $1.70<br />

050-{nt-00371-2 4.s0<br />

050-00t-002704 2.75<br />

This course is designed to be used witt,:<br />

15. Problem ldentification Manual for TrafJic<br />

Sqfety Programs<br />

36. A Profile ol Fatal Accidents Involving Alcohot.<br />

NHTSA Technical Report by James C. Fell. September<br />

1977. NTIS. PB-274 298. $4.50.<br />

37. Publications of the National Highway Trqffic<br />

Safety Administration. June 1977. Limired copies available<br />

from General Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-<br />

HS-802 _512.<br />

38. Report on Administrative Atljudication of<br />

Trqffic l4fractions, Highway Sajety Act of ISTJ (Section<br />

222). Iuly 1977. Limited copies available from Ceneral<br />

Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 612.<br />

39. Restraint Syslems Evaluation project Codebook,<br />

by Jeanie S. Mungenast and Charles J. Kahane.<br />

NHTSA Technical Note N43-32-2. March 1977. Limited<br />

copies available from General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 285.<br />

4O, Revrew of Head Rotational Measurements dur_<br />

ing Biomechanical Impact Tests. NHTSA Technical<br />

Report by Arnold K. Johnson and Anthony S. Hu.<br />

August 1977. NTIS. pB-Zjt 886. $4.50.<br />

41. Revrlew of Information on the Sqfety ffiects of<br />

the 55 MPH Speed Limit in the United Stdfes. NHTSA<br />

Technical Note by Donald F. Mela.<br />

30.<br />

May 1977.<br />

National<br />

Limited<br />

Training Cource, Enrcrgency Medicsl copies available from Ceneral<br />

Technicipn,<br />

Services<br />

Paramedic.<br />

Division,<br />

Cource Gude. June 1977. NHTSA. DOT.HS-802 383.<br />

Superintendent of [psurnsnts. No. 050_003_m27g_g.<br />

$2.50.<br />

42. The Role of Medical Advisory Boards in Driver<br />

Licensing. March 197?. Superintendent of f)ocuments.<br />

31. NII?1S/4 Reorganization Info,mation Decem- No. 05040340252-6. $1,20.<br />

ber 1977. Limited copies available from Ceneral Services<br />

Division. NHTSA.<br />

43. Rural Courts and Highway Safety. 1977. Lim_<br />

ited copies available from Ceneral Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 479.<br />

Volume I<br />

Volume II<br />

Orcjer No. Price<br />

050-mI-m262-3 $2.7s<br />

050-m l-m263-l 2.75<br />

4. Sgety Belt Instructional Series:<br />

4a. Information That Can Save your Life_The<br />

Safety Beil Instructional Series, Z publications, an<br />

Audio-Vkual Presentation, and a Game About Safety<br />

Belt Use and Effectiyeness. June 1977. Limited copies of<br />

descriptive brochure available from Ceneral Services<br />

Division, NHTSA.<br />

44b. The Automohile Safety BetI Facr Bpok. Feb_<br />

ruary 1977. Superintendenr of Documents. No. 050-003_<br />

002504. $0.80.<br />

4c.. EncoumEing Employees to Ilse Safety Belts, a<br />

Program Jor Industry and Governmenl. February jgj7.<br />

Superintcndent of Documents. No. 050403402474.<br />

$0.75.<br />

M. Getttng the Safety Belt Message Across, a<br />

Guidefor Driver Educslion Instructors. February 1977.<br />

Superintendent of Docurnents. No. 050-003-00245-3.<br />

$0.35.<br />

44+. How Many of These Fair1, Tales Have you<br />

Told? February 1977. Superintendent of Documenrs.<br />

No. 050-003-00251-8. 90.50. $4.50 per t00 copies.<br />

D-5


l4f . Safety Belt Activity Book, a Guidefor Teachers<br />

of Grades K-6. Fcbruary 1917. Superintendent of<br />

Documents. No. 050-003-00243-7. $ | .70.<br />

44g. The Sa.fety Belt Game. February 1977. Superintenderrt<br />

of Documents. No. 050-003-00246-1. $1.30.<br />

44h. The Sqfely Belt Message, Ihe Student's Lesson.<br />

February 1977. Superintendent of Documents. No.<br />

050-003-m2,9-5. $0.45.<br />

4/;i. Safety Belts-Fact or Fiction. A New Slidel<br />

Tape Program. 1977. National Audio Visual Center,<br />

Ceneral Services Administration, Order Section, Washingron,<br />

D.c. 20409. Titie No. 008919. $15.00. Make<br />

check payable to National Archives Trust Fund.<br />

4j. Teaching the Safety Belt MessaEe, a Guide for<br />

Teachers of Driver Education Instructors. February<br />

1977. Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-m3-<br />

00248,8. $0.35.<br />

45. Safety Consequences of Raising the National<br />

Speed Limit from 55 MPH to 60 MPH. NHTSA Technical<br />

Report by Ezio C. Cerrelli. May 1977, NTIS.<br />

PB-267 839. $5.25.<br />

a6. Sqfety Related Recall Campaigns for Motor<br />

Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment, Including Tires-<br />

Superintendent of Documents:<br />

Period Order No. Price<br />

I Jan. 19?7-31 March 197? 050-003-00274-7 $1.60<br />

I Apr. 1977-30 June 1977 050-003-00296-8 1.30<br />

47. School Bus Vehicle Sa.fett Report July 1977.<br />

Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-003-m275-5.<br />

$2.90.<br />

48. Seat Belt Performance in 30 M.P-H. Barrier<br />

Impacts. NHTSA Technical Report by John B. Morris.<br />

April 1977. NTIS. PB-269 962. $5.25.<br />

49. The Severily of Large Truck Accidents.<br />

NHTSA Technical No/e by James Medlund. April<br />

1977. t.imited copies available from General Services<br />

Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 332.<br />

50. Stste Vehicle Programs Spedal Reporf. June<br />

1977. Superintendent of Documents. No. 050-001-<br />

001284. $1.00.<br />

51. Slatus of the Highway Sqfety Program Standards<br />

as of January 1977. Novcmber 1977. Limited copies<br />

available I'rom Ceneral Services Division, NHTSA.<br />

DOT-HS-802 595.<br />

52. Subject Bibliography Series. NTIS:<br />

No.<br />

SB-II<br />

SB-I2<br />

SB.I3<br />

D.6<br />

Title NTIS Order No. Price<br />

Fuel Economy.<br />

1977.<br />

Brakes. 1977.<br />

Motortycles,<br />

19'7'1.<br />

PB-265 387 S 7.25<br />

PB-265 386 6.50<br />

SB-14 Tires. 1977.<br />

SB-15 Youth and Driv-<br />

PB-213 270 $19.m<br />

ing. 1977. Limited copies available<br />

from General Services Divi*<br />

sion, NHTSA. DOT-HS-<br />

80? 306. Will be available<br />

from NTIS at later date.<br />

5B-16 Periodic Motor<br />

Vehicle Inspection.<br />

1917.<br />

SB-17 Motor Vehicle<br />

Titling and Reg-<br />

PB-268 160/A5 9.00<br />

istration. 1977. PB-211235/AS 6.m<br />

SB-18 Bumpers. 1977.<br />

SB-19 Recreational<br />

PB-271 236/A5 7.25<br />

Vehicles. 1977. PB-271 237/AS 6.50<br />

SB-20 Pedestrians. 1977 - PB-272 920/OWT<br />

SB-21 Tethnical<br />

12.50<br />

Reports. 1911 .<br />

SB-22 Accident Risk<br />

Forecasling.<br />

PB-2'12'141 9.00<br />

1977. PB-272 936/6WT 6.00<br />

53. Supplement to the 1976 Report on Administrative<br />

Adjudication oJ' Trqffic Infractions. Highway<br />

Sqfett Att of 1973 (Section 222). March 1977. Limited<br />

copies available liom General Services Division,<br />

NHTSA. DOT.HS-802 254.<br />

54. Tips tn Car Care and Safety for Deaf Drivers.<br />

Spanish edition, February 1977. Limited copies available<br />

from General Services Division, NHTSA.<br />

55. Traffic Laws Commenlary. Superintendent of<br />

Documents:<br />

nlk<br />

Hardship licensing. May<br />

Order NcI Price<br />

1977. 050-003-00277-4 $2.30<br />

Rules of the Road Rated.<br />

october 1977. 050-003-00299-21.40<br />

56- Tra,ffic Safety Programs Multi-Year Plan, FY<br />

1979-1983. 1977+. Limited copies available from Office<br />

of Traffic Safety Programs, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 l8l.<br />

57. Traffic Sqfet! '76, a Digest of Activities o.f lhe<br />

Nalional Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Septcmber<br />

1977. Limitecl copics available tiom General<br />

Services Division, NHTSA. DOT-HS-802 505.<br />

58. Traffic Safety '76. A Report by the President<br />

on the Administration of the Highway Safery Ail of<br />

1966, as Amended. l9'l'1 . Superintcndent of<br />

Documents. No, 050-003-00269-1. $3.75.<br />

59. Traffic Salety '76. A Report by the President<br />

on the Administration of the National Trqffic and<br />

Motor Vehicle Safet! AcI of 1966, as Amended, and the<br />

Motor Vehicle Information & Cost Savings Act oJ'1972,<br />

PB-265 396 L00 * I 97? is thc ycar of receipt of an otherwisc undated publication.


Appendix E<br />

Current Research Grants<br />

and Contracts and the<br />

Problems They Address


RESEARCH AND DEVELOFMENT PROGRAM CODES<br />

3 Research and Development 361 Supporting Research<br />

33 Traffic Safety Rescarch 363 30ffi Pound Sedan<br />

331 Alcohol and Drug Programs 364 4000 Pound Sedan<br />

3313 Research on Relationship and Effect 365 Special Purposc Vehicles<br />

3314 Research on Countertneasures 366 Testing and Evaluation<br />

336 Driver-Pedestrian Factors Research 371 Vehicle Structures<br />

3361 Pedestrian Safety 37ll Flammability-Materials<br />

3362 Safety Belt Usage 3712 Postcrash Factors<br />

3363 Driver Education 3713 Crashworthiness-Energy Management<br />

3364 Driver Licensing Systems<br />

3365 Vehicle Factors 3714 Design f)evelopment<br />

3366 Safe Driving Conformance 3'll5 Production Feasihility-Application Study<br />

34 Accident Investigation and Data Analysis 3716 School Bus Safety<br />

341 Accident Investigation 372 Occupant Packaging<br />

342 Mathematical Analysis 3721 Restraints, Ceneral-Advanced Protection<br />

343 Information and Data Systems Systems Research<br />

351 Vehicle Operating Systems 3722 Air Bags-Protection Systems Development<br />

35ll Brakes and Evaluation<br />

3512 Vehicle Handling 3'123 Other Passive Restraints-Protection<br />

3513 Tires Systems-Validation Systems<br />

3514 Support Systems 3724 Belts and Integrated Restraints-Restraints-<br />

3515 Advanced Systems Special Projects<br />

352 Driver-Vehicle Interaction 371 Biomechanics<br />

3521 Driver Visibility 3731 Anthropomelrics and Human Simulation<br />

35??. Vehicle Lighting<br />

3732 Human Tolerance and Injury Mechanisms<br />

3523 Vehicle Instrumentation, Controls, and 3733 Kinematic Modeling and Validation<br />

Controllability 3'135 Protection Systems Performance Studies<br />

353 Fuel Economy , 391I Transportation and Handling of (iovernment<br />

354 Vehicles-in-Use Property<br />

36 Experimental Safety Vehicles 3921 Data Processing<br />

EA


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT<br />

CURRENT RESEARCH GRANTS AND CONTHACTS<br />

AND THE PROBLEM$ THEY ADDRESS<br />

Appendix E contains a list of reeearch contracts which<br />

were active during calendar year 1977. The National<br />

Highway Traffic Safety Administration's policy favors<br />

competitive procurement rather than the use of grants.<br />

The bulk of the research is performed by private industry<br />

and universities instead of government employees.<br />

Research is carried out primarily to develop data to support<br />

near-term and future standards.<br />

NI{TSA snd FHWA continue to allocate a significant<br />

portion of their research to priority programs. These<br />

E4<br />

priorities now include increased emphasis on motorcycle,<br />

moped, and pedestrian safety; emphasis on fundamental<br />

approaches to reducing alcohol and drug-related<br />

accidents; establishment of a research program to<br />

develop the technical support for fuel economy standards;<br />

an integrated effort to provide research results to<br />

support passive restraint standards; the integrated<br />

vehicle systems program to design, develop, construct,<br />

and test integrated vehicles embodying advanced technological<br />

features; and establishment of the initial portion<br />

of the National Accident Sampling System (NASS)<br />

by the National Center for Statistics and Analysis.


Program<br />

Code Tltlc<br />

3313AU System Analysis of a General<br />

Deterrent Countermeasure<br />

Program<br />

33138K Effects of Alcohol on the Driver's<br />

Visual I nformation Processing<br />

33138L ADP Support for Effects of Alcohol<br />

and Visual Information Processing<br />

33138N Pharmacoklnetlc Effects of Drugs on<br />

Driving Performance<br />

Table E-1. Major ResearchProfects<br />

Pedormed for HHTSA<br />

Under Contracts ActiveDuring<br />

Calendar Year 1977<br />

Contractor<br />

Contrsct Numbsr<br />

3313CA A Comparison of Alcohol Involvement Essex Corporation<br />

in Exposed and Injured Drivers DOT-HS4{09S4<br />

3313C8 Alcohol in Pedestrians and Pedestrian Dunlap and Associate$, Inc.<br />

Casualties<br />

DoT-HS-4.00S46<br />

3313C0 On-The-Road Detectlon of DWI'g<br />

3313DA Drug Use in Drlver Fatalities and<br />

Slmilarly Exposed Drivers<br />

3313DC State of Knowledge and Informatlon<br />

Needs in Alcohol/Drugs and Highway<br />

Safety<br />

3313EC Test for Detectlon of Mariluana in<br />

Body Fluids<br />

3313EF Development and Valldatlon of Narv<br />

Marlluana Technology Data<br />

3313EH Drug Research Methodology<br />

3313E1 Analysls for Drugs In $allva and<br />

Breath<br />

3313F8 The Effects of Alcohol on the Driver's<br />

Deci$ion-Making<br />

Behavior<br />

3313FC Special Problems and C/M$ Targets<br />

for Fleduction of Alcohol-Belaled<br />

Casualties<br />

3313FF Effects of Alcohol and Marijuana on<br />

Driver Control Behavior<br />

3313FH Psychophysical Tests for D\tVl Anest<br />

3313F1 Techniques for Predicting High-Risk<br />

Drivers for Alcohol Countermeasure$<br />

3313FJ Charge of DWI Drivers-Alcohol/Crash<br />

Involved, Arrested, and On-th+Road<br />

Anacapa $ciences, Inc. 08/16/76<br />

DOT-HS+01456 04lml78<br />

Southern California<br />

Research Institute<br />

DOT-HS-il1233<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management11112176<br />

Sy$tems<br />

1'il1il7e<br />

PO-7-313?<br />

N.l.D.A.<br />

rloT-Hs-7.016511A<br />

Anacapa Sciences, lnc,<br />

DOT-HS-741538<br />

Midwest Research lnstltute<br />

DOT-l-tS-440941<br />

University of Michlgan<br />

DOT-HS-5.01217<br />

University of Missourl<br />

DOT-HS-440968<br />

University of Mlssourl,<br />

Kansas City<br />

DOT-HS-741s27<br />

HSRI<br />

DOT-H$7{1530<br />

Flesearch Triangle Instltute<br />

DOT-HS-7-01737<br />

Systems Technology, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-440999<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

ooT-Hs-4-00945<br />

Funds Used<br />

(fhousands of Dollart)<br />

Siarl Pre.<br />

Ffnlsh FY T6 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />

06/30/75<br />

06115t77<br />

@t14trl<br />

07t1Atffi<br />

w17174<br />

o2128ln<br />

0fl30/74<br />

05/1s78<br />

og0u7f<br />

m/oe79<br />

ffi125t74<br />

ffi125t77<br />

03130t77<br />

12131177<br />

ffit28t74<br />

06125t77<br />

10/19/76<br />

fitlwn<br />

10t28t78<br />

12/31t77<br />

ffil28lT7<br />

w28179<br />

ffi12w74<br />

111w77<br />

w17174<br />

01/15ln<br />

Systems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75<br />

DOT-HS-5.01257 09/30/78<br />

Soulhern Californla Feeearch 06/30/75<br />

f nstitute o5lw77<br />

DOT-HS-+0124e<br />

Universlty of North Carolina 06/30/75<br />

DOT-HS-S01250 1113p/77<br />

StanfordResearchlnstltute 06/09/75<br />

DOT-HS-Fo1 176 01131177<br />

154<br />

174<br />

326<br />

u4<br />

1m<br />

100<br />

23<br />

42<br />

73<br />

196 30<br />

208 25<br />

88<br />

119<br />

1m<br />

166<br />

33<br />

s7 34<br />

E4 Nl<br />

27<br />

30<br />

81<br />

B2<br />

151<br />

17<br />

23<br />

151


Program<br />

Code Thle<br />

3314AG SoberingAgentEflectiveness<br />

Measurement and Development<br />

3314AM Critical Task Interlock Units for Poland<br />

And USSR<br />

33148M Disposable Breath Tester and Breath<br />

Collection Device<br />

Table E-1. (Continued)<br />

Conlractor<br />

Contract Number<br />

33148N Breath Measurementlnstrumentation Transportation Systems Center 10/01/76<br />

PPA.HS-702 09t30t77<br />

3314D8 ldentlflcation of DWI BehavioJ PatternsP$ychometrics,<br />

Inc. 06i30i75<br />

and Methods for Change<br />

DOT.HS-5-01270 06/30/78<br />

3361AE Flural PedestrianAccident$<br />

3361AJ Alcohol Involvement in Pedestrians<br />

and Pedestrian Casualties<br />

33618A $pecific Problems and Countermeasures<br />

for Bicycle SafetY<br />

336188 Urban Crossing Problemg<br />

3361CM ldentification and Feaslbillty Test of<br />

Specialized Rural Pedestrian Training<br />

3361CN Dev€lopment of Modol Regulations for<br />

Rural Pedestrian Safety<br />

3361CO ldent, and Development of Countermeasures<br />

for Bicyclist/Motor Vehicle<br />

Problems<br />

3361DC Experimental Field Test of Proposed<br />

Anti-Dart-Out Trainlng Programs<br />

3361DD Experlmental Fietd Test of Proposed<br />

Pedeslrian Safety Messages<br />

33610H Development and Test of Selected<br />

Model Pedestrlan Safety Regulatlons<br />

3361EC Experimental Field Test of lce Cream<br />

Vendor Model Ordinance<br />

33,61FA EnforcementFrequency,Sanctlons<br />

and Compliance Level for Pedestrian<br />

Safety<br />

3361F8 Evaluation of Exlstlng Pedestrlan and<br />

Bicyclist Regulations<br />

Southern California Research 06/30/75 145<br />

lnstitute<br />

DOT-HS 5 01245<br />

12130177<br />

Systems Technology, Inc.<br />

DOT-H5-6-01467<br />

University of Oklahoma<br />

Health Services Center<br />

DOnHS-7-01795<br />

Funde Used<br />

(fhousands<br />

of Dollare)<br />

Start Pre.<br />

Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />

w20176<br />

10131177<br />

09130177<br />

09/30/79<br />

Biotechnology, Inc. 06/30/73<br />

DOT-HS-355-3-718 QA15n8<br />

Dunlap and Associates, Inc. 06130174 326<br />

DOT-H$-4-00946 0s/15/78<br />

Anacapa Sciences, lnc. 06128174<br />

DOT.HS-4-00982 05tW77<br />

ApplledScienceAssociates, 06120175<br />

lnc. 1113Q177<br />

DOT-HS-$01163<br />

3361CL Road Worker and Dismounted Motorist Dunlap and Associates, Inc. Wl26l77<br />

Pedestrian Safety Regulations DOT-HS-7.01712 05t26t79<br />

ApptiedScienceAssociates, Ogl30l77<br />

Inc. 05/30/79<br />

DOT-H$7.0174S<br />

Dunlap and Associates, Inc.<br />

DOT-H5-7-01753<br />

Dunlap and Associates, Inc.<br />

DOT-H5-7-01726<br />

ffit28t77<br />

12t2W78<br />

Qgr28177<br />

09/28/79<br />

AppliedScienceAssociates, 06124174<br />

lnc. 11139177<br />

DOT-HS-4-00955<br />

Dunlap and Associates, Inc. ffi128174<br />

DOT-HS-4-00952 05/31/79<br />

Dunlap and Associates, Inc. 08113176<br />

DOT-HS-6-01444 04t13r77<br />

Dunlap and Associates. Inc. 0f/07175<br />

DoT-HS-5-01 144 12131t77<br />

Dunlap and Associates, lnc. 06/05/75<br />

DOT-HS-$01168 01/31/78<br />

Dunlap and Associates, lnc. 06/30/78<br />

DOT-HS-6-01411 ffit30t77<br />

80<br />

553<br />

168<br />

323<br />

345 230 119<br />

129<br />

95<br />

73<br />

27<br />

65<br />

42<br />

56 94 31<br />

78<br />

55<br />

192<br />

613<br />

118<br />

175<br />

108<br />

52<br />

25


Program<br />

Code Tlrls<br />

3361FG Provision of Pedestrian and Bicyclist<br />

Base Llne Data<br />

3362AQ Development of Speciflcations for<br />

Passive Belt Systems<br />

336284 $afety Belt Usage $urvey of the Traffic<br />

Population<br />

33628D Safety Belt Usage Attitudes<br />

33628L Evaluatlon of Safety Belt Educailonal<br />

Program for EmPloYees<br />

3sEZBN Lease Toyota for Belt Evaluatlon<br />

336280 Safety Belt Educational Material<br />

33628P Safety B,slt Educatlonal Materlal<br />

336285 Safety B€lt Usage ln the Trafflc<br />

Population<br />

33628T validatlon of Safety Belt Usage Data<br />

33628U Safety Belt Education Program Distribution<br />

Listing<br />

33628V Betrieval of DMV Data<br />

33628W<br />

Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />

Contractor<br />

Gontrac{ Numbor<br />

AppliedScienceAssociates, 08/0276<br />

lnc.<br />

03/31/79<br />

DOT-Hs-Fo14s3<br />

Man Factors, Inc.<br />

DOT-Hs,7-01617<br />

Kirschner A$sociates<br />

DoT-H$S41340<br />

336288 Safety Belt Educatlon Program: Dlstrl- National Business Lists<br />

bution Listing<br />

Po-7-3212<br />

33634H<br />

3363C1<br />

3363CM<br />

3363F8<br />

3363Fc<br />

Effectiveness of MVMA Safety Belt<br />

Mass Media Campaign<br />

Computer Services<br />

Teknekron, Inc.<br />

DOT-H$-7{1644<br />

Oplnion Research Corp.<br />

ooT-HS.7-o1707<br />

Toyota Motor Sals$ USA, Inc.<br />

PO-7-3e28<br />

G$A, National AudieVisual<br />

Genter<br />

Po7-324414<br />

NHTSA. General Seryices<br />

Dlvision<br />

Reqn. 4842062<br />

Opinion Research CorP.<br />

DoT-HS.7-01736<br />

Qpinion Research Corp.<br />

PG7-3396<br />

National Business Lists<br />

Various<br />

$tate Depts. of Motor Vehlcles<br />

Various lnvoices<br />

Opinion Research Corp.<br />

PO-7.365?<br />

NHTSA, Office of Managementofl03/77<br />

Systerns<br />

09/30/77<br />

ADP-77-075<br />

Safe Performance Curriculum Perform- University of Southern 0fl30/75<br />

ance Measures<br />

California<br />

DoT-HS-ffi1263<br />

02128177<br />

Youth Alcohol Safety Education Crlterla<br />

Development<br />

Survey Analysls ol Short-Term<br />

Approaches to Rehabilitation of Convicted<br />

DWI's<br />

Feasibility of Developing Trainlng Prr<br />

gram to lmprove Deficient Driver<br />

Factors<br />

3363GA Accident Avoidance $kill Training<br />

National Publlc Service<br />

Research Institute<br />

DOT-HS-7{1794<br />

Mc Ber and Company<br />

DOT-H$s-o1253<br />

IRPS<br />

DOT-HS-7-01811<br />

Essex Corporation<br />

DOT HS-7{1547<br />

Funds Us€d<br />

(Ihoueands of Dollars)<br />

Start Pre-<br />

Flnlsh FY 76 FY 78 FY z FY 7E<br />

07t15177<br />

Q7115178<br />

Q5125t76<br />

09r2fl78<br />

12116t76<br />

12116t76<br />

ffi|ffit77<br />

07/0978<br />

w3't177<br />

11131178<br />

01lo3t77<br />

oz0F/n<br />

03/0e77<br />

03/0977<br />

07t07tn<br />

07tQ7t7?<br />

09,30t7?<br />

0430/80<br />

w06177<br />

04106177<br />

05t17ln<br />

05117m<br />

06t24t77<br />

06124177<br />

0B/ofl77<br />

0&09/77<br />

09/30/77<br />

03/31/79<br />

ffit27t75 71<br />

1A31177<br />

09/30fi7<br />

03/30/78<br />

1A15l7E<br />

12t15t77<br />

60<br />

87<br />

145<br />

17<br />

€9<br />

34<br />

118<br />

36<br />

TI<br />

56<br />


Program<br />

Code Tlil0<br />

3363G8<br />

3364AO<br />

33644P<br />

3364AU<br />

3364AX<br />

33648A<br />

3364CA<br />

33S4CB<br />

&364CC<br />

3364CD<br />

3364CE<br />

33B4DB<br />

33658H<br />

3S658l<br />

336581<br />

33658N<br />

3366AC<br />

3366AF<br />

3366A1<br />

Vehicle Zones: lmplicatlons for Driver<br />

Education<br />

Mark ll B Vlsion Tester Procurement<br />

Vision Tester Validation Study<br />

Peripheral Vlslon Training for Motor<br />

Vehicle Drivers<br />

Analysis of State Boad Test<br />

Examinations<br />

Drlver Visual Limitatlons Diagnosis<br />

and Treatment<br />

Integrated Safe Driving Information<br />

System Development<br />

Older Driver Licensing and lmprov+<br />

ment System<br />

Heavy Vehicle Driver Licensing<br />

Feasibility of Developing a Medlcal<br />

Candition Data CQllection Sy$tem<br />

Feasibility of Designating Medical<br />

Examiners for Interstate Commercial<br />

Drivers<br />

Development of Driver lmprovement<br />

System for Traffic Violators and Acc.<br />

ReDeaters<br />

Development of an In-Traffic Test for<br />

Motorcycles<br />

Motorcycle Operator $klll Test<br />

Develooment<br />

Field Test of Motorcycle Safety<br />

Education Course for Nonriders<br />

Advanced Motorcycle Flider Course<br />

Development Plan<br />

Gltizen Participatlon to lmprove Hlghway<br />

Salety<br />

Decriminalization Admini$trative<br />

Adjudication<br />

Traffic Law $anctions<br />

Table E-1. (Continued)<br />

Gontractol<br />

Contract Number<br />

Vector Enterprises, Inc. QSl27l77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01791 0gt2ry78<br />

Honeywell, lnc. ffil29l70<br />

DOT-HS.6-01342 02/11178<br />

National Con, Service, Inc. 0'1111177<br />

Safety Management<br />

DOT-HS-7-01537<br />

01111175<br />

Human Factors Research, Inc. ffi117175<br />

DOT-HS-5-01204 cft]28177<br />

HSBC, University of North Ogl15l77<br />

Carollna<br />

DOT-H5-7-01698<br />

02115178<br />

Indiana University<br />

DOT-HS-5-01275<br />

National Pub. $er. Res. Inst.<br />

DOT-HS"6-01397<br />

Dunlap and Assoclates, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-7{1502<br />

University of North Carolina<br />

DOT-HS-7-01807<br />

Dunlap and Associates, lnc.<br />

DOT.H5-7-01796<br />

Health Safety Associate$, lnc.<br />

DOT.H5-7-01762<br />

Funds Usad<br />

(Thousands<br />

of Dollars)<br />

Start Pre.<br />

Flnieh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

06/30/75<br />

o4t3a77<br />

06/10/76<br />

12r'10n7<br />

10/19/76<br />

12115t77<br />

04t01t78<br />

Q4t01t7g<br />

09/30/77<br />

12130178<br />

09t23177<br />

03/31/78<br />

National Pub. Serv. Hes. Inst. Wl30ln<br />

DOT.HS-7-01766 0S30/79<br />

National Pub. $erv. Res. Inst. 10114176<br />

DOT-HS-7-01526 12tQ8t77<br />

Essex Corporation 0910U77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01702 09/08/78<br />

Applied$cienceAssociation 07115177<br />

DOT-HS-7-01635 07115177<br />

National Pub. Serv. Bes. Inst. 09127177<br />

DOT.HS-7-01735 09t27t78<br />

University of Mlchigan 06130175<br />

DOT-HS-5-01184 0?t28179<br />

PRC Systems Scionces Co. 09/30/75<br />

DOT-HS-6-01285 12131t77<br />

Publlc Management Services, 07128177<br />

f nc. Q7l28l7g<br />

DOT-HS-7-01508<br />

3366AJ Legal Constraints Relevant to Counter- University of Michigan 1't110176<br />

100<br />

mea$ure Development<br />

DOT-HS-7-01536<br />

03t01179<br />

74<br />

92<br />

62<br />

450<br />

40<br />

13<br />

97<br />

sg<br />

118<br />

51<br />

223<br />

49<br />

24<br />

156<br />

98<br />

99<br />

52<br />

165<br />

99<br />

82<br />

104<br />

90<br />

17<br />

n2


Program<br />

Code<br />

3366AK<br />

3366AM<br />

3366AO<br />

3372AA<br />

341 1AH<br />

341 1 BE<br />

34118N<br />

3411CD<br />

3411CF<br />

3411CH<br />

341 1CJ<br />

3411CL<br />

3411CM<br />

3411F8<br />

3411FC<br />

341 1 FD<br />

341 1 FE<br />

341 1 FF<br />

3411FG<br />

3411FH<br />

341 1 Fl<br />

Tltlo<br />

Public Acceptability of Highway Safety<br />

Countermeagures<br />

ldent, of General Deterrence Countermeasures<br />

for Unsafe Driving Actlons<br />

Standards Development and Qualification<br />

Testing for Speed-Measuring<br />

Devices<br />

National Energy Efflcient Driving<br />

System<br />

Buy Scientlf lc Literature<br />

Prototype National Accident Investigatlon<br />

Study<br />

Management Infonnatlon Syatem for<br />

Version ll of the Crash Program<br />

lmprovement of Narrow Oblect Accident<br />

Recon$tructi0n<br />

Research lnput for Computer Simulation<br />

of Automobile Collisions<br />

SMAC Collision $ubrouting<br />

Automatic lteration of $MAC Program<br />

Revlslon of $MAC Integratlon<br />

Algorithm<br />

$imulation Package to Perform Calculation<br />

of Collision Forces in SMAC<br />

NASS Data Collection Teams<br />

NASS Data Collectlon Teams<br />

NASS Data Collection Teams<br />

NASS Data Collectlon Tsam8<br />

NAS$ Data C,ollection Teams<br />

NAS$ Data Collectlon Teams<br />

NAS$ Data Collection Teams<br />

NAS$ Data Collection Teams<br />

Table Fl. (Contlnued)<br />

Contractol<br />

Conirac{ Numbsr<br />

Mathematica Policy Flesearch, QW27176<br />

lnc.<br />

99t27t77<br />

DoT-HS+01466<br />

Univer$ity of Michlgan<br />

DOT-HS-7-01797<br />

National Bureau of Standards<br />

DOT HS-7-01697<br />

National Pub. Sorv. Res, Inst.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01775<br />

Funds Used<br />

(fhousands<br />

of Dollars)<br />

Start Pr+<br />

Finieh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

w27t77<br />

w27t78<br />

08t24t77<br />

08t24tffi<br />

0$/30/77<br />

09/30/78<br />

American Ass'n. for Automotlveogt27t77<br />

Medicine<br />

09t27t77<br />

PO-7-3766<br />

University of Michigan<br />

DOT-H5.+00890<br />

McDonnell Douglas<br />

Automation<br />

PS7-3262<br />

Texas Transportatlon lnstitute<br />

DOT-HS-7-01656<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-7-01511<br />

IPA-YAU WU<br />

PA-4&2-5.01<br />

West Virginia UnlversitY<br />

DOT-HS-&01820<br />

CHI Associates<br />

DOT-HS-7'01545<br />

Control Data Corporatlon<br />

Po-7-3319<br />

IITRI<br />

DOT-HS-7-01738<br />

KAPPA<br />

DoT.H5-741739<br />

Franklin<br />

oor-Hs-7{1740<br />

SWRI<br />

DOT.HS-7{1741<br />

ofl1974<br />

0s/30/78<br />

01121t77<br />

03t21t77<br />

ffit?g,tn<br />

w29tn<br />

12116t7A<br />

02/0fl78<br />

07t2gt70<br />

07129t77<br />

1A15n7<br />

12t15178<br />

12113t78<br />

vst1lln<br />

0a17Fl<br />

08IlTITI<br />

09t30t77<br />

09/30/80<br />

09/30/z<br />

0s/30/80<br />

w30t77<br />

09/30/80<br />

oet3a77<br />

@t3otffi<br />

Univ. of Alabama at Montevalloo9l3Qt77<br />

DOT.H5-7-01742<br />

09/30/80<br />

Manag€m€nt Englneerlng aslwn<br />

DOT.HS-7-01743<br />

09/30/80<br />

State of Michlgan<br />

DOT-HS-7-01744<br />

KLD<br />

DOT.HS-7-0174S<br />

w30177<br />

09/30/80<br />

@l3Qt77<br />

0g/30/80<br />

53<br />

100<br />

30 30<br />

51<br />

2<br />

603 ss<br />

2<br />

14<br />

198<br />

35<br />

22<br />

18<br />

275<br />

129<br />

173<br />

134<br />

218<br />

130<br />

161<br />

137<br />

81


Program<br />

Code TIIIE<br />

3411FJ NASS Data Cotlection Teams<br />

34llFK NA$$ Data C,ollectlon Teams<br />

3411GA Accldent Causatlon Methodology Dev.<br />

for the National Accident Sampling<br />

3411G8 Establish Zone Center for the National<br />

Accident Sampling $y$tem<br />

3411GC Zone Center for National Accident<br />

Sampling System<br />

3411GE Zone Center for Natlonal Accident<br />

Sampling $y$tem<br />

3411GJ National Accldent Sampling System<br />

Sample Design Phases 2 and 3<br />

3411GL On-The-Job Training for NASS<br />

3411GM Accident Inve$tigationTraining<br />

Textbooks<br />

Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />

Coniractor<br />

Contract Numbet<br />

Texas Transportation Institute<br />

DOT-HS-7-01746<br />

Unlversity of Southern<br />

Californla<br />

DOT-HS-7-01747<br />

Indiana University Foundatlon o'Jtfim<br />

DOT-HS-7-01690<br />

w28t78<br />

Indiana University Foundation w22177<br />

DOT-HS-7-o1652<br />

ffit22t79<br />

Indiana University Foundation 08125t77<br />

DOT-H5-7-01653<br />

08t25t79<br />

Calspan Field Servlces, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS"7-01654<br />

3411GF Introduction to NAss Field Techniques Allen Corp. of America<br />

DOT-H5-7-01577<br />

3411GN<br />

3411GO<br />

3411GP<br />

3414AC<br />

3414FA<br />

3414F8<br />

3414FC<br />

3414FD<br />

3414FE<br />

3414FF<br />

3414FG<br />

3414FH<br />

E-10<br />

Buy Marklng Tape<br />

Driver Tralning Course<br />

Buy Cameras<br />

Tri-level Study of the Gauses of Traffic<br />

Accidents<br />

National Crash Severlty Study<br />

Natlonal Cresh Severity Study<br />

National Crash Severity $tudy<br />

Natlonal Crash Severlty $tudy<br />

Natlonal Crash Severity Study<br />

National Crash Sevefity Study<br />

Natlonal Cra8h Severity Study Quallty<br />

Control<br />

Computer<br />

System Design and<br />

Qsyslqpment<br />

westat, Inc,<br />

DOT'HS-7-01706<br />

Various<br />

Various<br />

The Traffic ln$titute. Northwestern<br />

University<br />

PO-7-3737<br />

York Tape and Label Corp.<br />

PO-7-3736<br />

Allen Corooration<br />

PO-7-3734<br />

Brenner<br />

PO-7-3758<br />

Ultrasystems, Inc.<br />

DOT.HS-FO1SEB<br />

University of Miami<br />

DOT-HS-S01389<br />

Calspan Corporatlon<br />

DOT-H5-6-01390<br />

Southwest Research Institute<br />

DOT-H5"6-01391<br />

Indiana University Foundation 07116176<br />

DOT.HS-F01392<br />

07t16t78<br />

H$Rl, University of Michigan<br />

Dor-H5-6-01393<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS+01442<br />

Gontrol Data Corporation<br />

DOT-H5,7-01531<br />

Funds Ussd<br />

(fhousands<br />

of Dollars)<br />

Start Pre.<br />

Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

ogt3Qt77<br />

09/30/80<br />

w30t77<br />

09/30/80<br />

og25l77<br />

owzil78<br />

oa18n7<br />

0819/79<br />

w30t77<br />

05/30/79<br />

11t04t77<br />

't1t04t77<br />

09114t77<br />

ogt14t77<br />

11104177<br />

11t04t77<br />

11103177<br />

11t0g77<br />

111O8t77<br />

11t0fl77<br />

Indiana University Foundation w15t72<br />

DOT-HS-034-3-s35 04130t77<br />

Q7t1il7ts<br />

07118178<br />

07/16/76<br />

07t16t78<br />

07t16t76<br />

07116178<br />

Q7t16t76<br />

07116t78<br />

07116176<br />

07t1H78<br />

05120176<br />

08t2u78<br />

10/19/76<br />

wo1t77<br />

400 164<br />

202<br />

160<br />

,346<br />

201<br />

173<br />

201<br />

120<br />

114<br />

209<br />

145<br />

74<br />

129<br />

113<br />

100<br />

189<br />


Program<br />

Gode Tltle<br />

3414F1 National Crash Severity Study<br />

3414FJ Narrow Bridge Collislon Sltes<br />

3414GA Accident Invest. Methodology to<br />

,A$sess Fole of Vehicle Handling in<br />

Highway SafetY<br />

3414G8 Accident Causalion and Accldent<br />

Avoidance<br />

3416A4 Motorcycle Accident Factors and<br />

ldentif lcation Countermeasures<br />

Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />

Conlractol<br />

Conlract Number<br />

341684 InvestigationofMotorVehicle/Bicycle University of Southern<br />

Collision Parameters<br />

California<br />

DOT-HS-541231<br />

3416CA Pedestrian Inlury Causstlon<br />

Parameters<br />

3416C8 PedestrianlnJuryCausation<br />

Parameterg<br />

3416CD Pedestrian Injury Causatlon<br />

Parameters<br />

3416CE Pedestrian Injury Causation<br />

Parameters<br />

3416DB<br />

3416DC<br />

Fleet Accident Evaluation of<br />

FMVSS 121<br />

121 Onsite Fleet Inspectlone<br />

3416EA Accident Analysis Breakaway and<br />

Nonbreakaway Poles and Standards<br />

on Highways<br />

3416FA Study of Driver Behavioral Errors in<br />

Alcohol, Marijuana and other Drug<br />

Involved Collisions<br />

3416GA Motor Vehicle Accident Investigation<br />

Research Study-D.C. Area<br />

3417AN Air Cushion Restraint System (ACRS)<br />

Accidents (N.E. Region)<br />

3il17AP Investigation of Air Cushlon Flestralnt<br />

System Accidents-Southwest Reg ion<br />

3417AO Investigation of Air Cushion Restraint<br />

System Accidents<br />

3421AM lmpact of Recent Changes in the<br />

Highway $afety Environment<br />

University of Kentucky<br />

DOT-HS-F01394<br />

FHWA<br />

DOT-H5-7-016081A<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-7-01575<br />

University of Michigan 09127177<br />

DOT-HS-7-01669 09t27t79<br />

University of Southern 11123175 100<br />

California<br />

DOT-HS-S01160<br />

121Q1179<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-H5-7-01579<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-H5-7-01s78<br />

Southwest Research Instltute<br />

DOT.HS-7-01580<br />

Traffic Safety Research C.orp.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01581<br />

University of Michigan<br />

DOT-HS-Fo1286<br />

Transportation Research and<br />

Marketing<br />

PO-7.3387<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-So1179<br />

Ultrasystems, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-6-01346<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT.HS-S01304<br />

Southwest Research lnstltuts<br />

DOT-H5-6-01309<br />

University of Miami<br />

DQT-HS-6-01315<br />

University of North Carolina<br />

DOT-HS-4-00897<br />

Funds Uted<br />

(fhousands ol DollarE]<br />

Start Pre'<br />

Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY n FY 78<br />

07/16/76<br />

07/16/78<br />

08130177<br />

06/30/78<br />

03/16/77<br />

06t16t78<br />

3416A8 lmpact of Motorcycle Usage In Kansas Univ. of Kansas Medlcal Center 01114177<br />

DOT-HS-7-01563<br />

12t31ln<br />

06/30/75<br />

06/30/78<br />

o4l1w77<br />

04/18/80<br />

04118t77<br />

04/18/BO<br />

04t1w77<br />

04/18/80<br />

Q4t18177<br />

04/1fl80<br />

ffil?6t75<br />

06/3,0/78<br />

o4tQAt77<br />

QAt04ln<br />

Southwest Research Institute 06/30/75<br />

DOT-HS-S01266 01131t78<br />

ffit23175<br />

06/23/78<br />

05120176<br />

05t20178<br />

't2123/75<br />

09/30/78<br />

01/0976<br />

09/30/78<br />

01129t76<br />

ww78<br />

ffi125174<br />

09/30/78<br />

140<br />

187<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

114<br />

635<br />

494<br />

18<br />

32<br />

92<br />

223<br />

210<br />

150 200 148<br />

151<br />

254<br />

275<br />

247<br />

96<br />

65<br />

86<br />

192<br />

491<br />

58<br />

100<br />

39<br />

87<br />

E-l1


Program<br />

Code Thle<br />

34218A Design of National Exposure Data<br />

System<br />

3/.22AO Fact Book<br />

34224P Injury Scaling R€search<br />

3422AQ National Exposure Data System<br />

(National Personal Trans. Sys. Data)<br />

3422AS Statistical Analysis of Crash<br />

Gonditions<br />

3422AT Adj. of Natlonal Center for Health<br />

Stat. Data<br />

g22AV Computer Support for Adjustment of<br />

NCHS Data<br />

3422AW Fact Book Data Management<br />

3422AX Computer Services tor HSRI Accident<br />

Data Files<br />

3423AH Data Sources to Support the NHTSA<br />

Defects I nvestigation System<br />

3423AV Data Retrieval and Artalvsis<br />

3423AW Truck Aecldent Study<br />

Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />

Gontractor<br />

Contract Number<br />

3423CH Est. the Effects of Crash-Fhase Center for the Environment<br />

FMVSS on Driver Fatality Risk in Z.Car and Man<br />

Collision<br />

PO-7-3261<br />

3425AC Procurement of Mortality Tapes<br />

34254E Purchase of Gencat Tape<br />

3425AG Buy Tabulatlons of Hlghway Safety<br />

Accident Data<br />

3431AH Reporting System<br />

3431C| Data Prep. of NHTSA Mutttdlsc. Acci.<br />

dent Investigation Reports<br />

3431CQ Computer Service$ for HSRI Accidenl<br />

Data Files<br />

University<br />

of Michigan<br />

DOT-H5-7-01685<br />

Various Contractors<br />

Various Contracts<br />

Universlty<br />

of North Carolina<br />

DOT-HS-7-01539<br />

FHWA<br />

DOT-HS-&01474tA<br />

3/'22AR Highway Safety Effects of the Energy University of Michigan<br />

Crisis on U.S. Toll Roads<br />

DOT-HS.4 00980<br />

University of Wisconsin 01106177<br />

DOT HS-7-01559 01/06/78<br />

Opportunity Systems (SBA) Wl30l76<br />

DOT-HS-6-01501 12t31t77<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management 10101176<br />

Sy$tems 09130177<br />

ADP-77-O71<br />

Automated Sclence Group, lnc. wHn<br />

DOT-HS-7-016M<br />

09/19/78<br />

Universlty of Michigan<br />

PO-8-0103<br />

Universlty of Michigan<br />

DOT-HS-7-01804<br />

System$ and Applied Sclences 04t01t77<br />

Corporation<br />

07t15t77<br />

DOT-HS-6-01507<br />

Unlversity of $outhern<br />

Calllornla<br />

DOT-HS-7-01565<br />

HEW, U.S. Div. of Vital<br />

$tatistics<br />

PO-8-0104<br />

Richard Landis, Universlty<br />

of<br />

North Carolina<br />

PO-7-3295<br />

HSRC, University of<br />

North Carolina<br />

DOT-HS-7-01757<br />

Control Data C,orporatlon<br />

DOT-HS-5-01183<br />

Unlversity of Michigan<br />

DOT"HS-5-01134<br />

Univsrsily of Michigan Office<br />

of Besearch Admin.<br />

PO.7-03001<br />

Funds Ueod<br />

(Thousands<br />

ol Dollars)<br />

Stail Pre.<br />

Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7E<br />

08t09t77<br />

08/09/78<br />

06/28/76<br />

06/?8/77<br />

11tfit7B<br />

o?t2w7B<br />

09/30/76<br />

0g/30/78<br />

00/00/00<br />

02101t77<br />

1Qt01t77<br />

10tQ1t77<br />

09130177<br />

03/30/78<br />

o?/08fi7<br />

01i07i78<br />

01t2Qt77<br />

10t20t77<br />

111O4t77<br />

11104177<br />

aao1t77<br />

ozt01t77<br />

07t19t77<br />

07119t78<br />

06/30/75<br />

01t01t77<br />

04t17t75<br />

06/30/78<br />

11101t76<br />

11t01t77<br />

88<br />

136<br />

47<br />

367 295<br />


Program<br />

Code<br />

Tlilc<br />

34328S ADP Time Sharing<br />

34il2DF Source Document Data Convsrslon<br />

for Fatal Accident Reportlng System<br />

3432DS FAHSMalntenancs<br />

34il2DT Fatal Accldent Reporting System<br />

State Contracts<br />

3432DW Fatal Accldent Heportlng System<br />

Maintenance<br />

3432DY NCSA-Remote Data Entry Trainlng<br />

Sesslon<br />

3432HF Multidlsciplinary Acc. Inv. Data File<br />

3432JE StatB Access to National Deta Bases<br />

34il2JF LexlcographerProgramTape<br />

34tl2JK Health Int€rvl€$, $urvey Data<br />

3432L8 Lease Fenewal whh eomputer Fro<br />

duct. Unlimited for Terminale<br />

3511AH lmproved Passenger Car Braklng<br />

Performance<br />

3511DE Collision Avoidance Radar Braklng<br />

System<br />

3511DF Long Life grake System<br />

3511DJ Collislon Avoldance Radar Braklng<br />

$ystem<br />

3511EF Tecfrnical FieldSupPon-Brak€<br />

System Testing<br />

3511E| Purchase of Beechwood Mobile Home<br />

3511EJ BuY Car for Test<br />

3511EK Buy Gar for Test<br />

Table E-i. (Contlnued)<br />

, Conlraclol<br />

Contract Numbor<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/70<br />

Systems<br />

ogt3oI77<br />

ADP-77051<br />

Institute of Modern Proce<br />

dures. SBA<br />

DOT-HS-il10€0<br />

GTE Inlormation Systerng<br />

Various Orders<br />

Each State, D.C. and Puerto<br />

Bico<br />

Various Contract8<br />

$igma Data Serylcg<br />

Po-7-3776<br />

Various Invoices<br />

University of Mlchlgan<br />

DoT.HS-eo1303<br />

Control Data Corporatlon-<br />

OMS<br />

ADP-77-066<br />

Duallabs, Arllngton, Va.<br />

PO.7-3342<br />

National Center for Statistics<br />

and Analysis<br />

PO-7-3594<br />

NHTSA, Offlce of Management<br />

Sy$lems<br />

Po+0215<br />

University of Michigan<br />

DOT-HS-S013SB<br />

Bendix Besearch Lab.<br />

DOT-HS-S014s0<br />

Scienc€ Applicatlon<br />

DOT-HS741776<br />

Bendix Research Lab.<br />

DoT-HS-+01450<br />

Aberdeen Proving Grounds<br />

DoT-HS-S01033<br />

Koons Pontiac-Olds-GMG<br />

Truck, Inc.<br />

Po-7-4677<br />

Dave<br />

ryle$ Lincoln-Mercury<br />

Pc-74727<br />

Sport Chevrolet<br />

Pc-7-4726<br />

Fundr Used<br />

(Thourands ol Drollaru)<br />

Stlrt PIF<br />

Flnlah FY 76 FY 7e Ff n Ff 7t<br />

o1/oa75<br />

o2l21l7E<br />

w23tTl<br />

05123177<br />

03t11177<br />

03t11177<br />

wwft<br />

wffit77<br />

11t16ln<br />

't1n6ln<br />

0111?/76<br />

uha77<br />

10/01/76<br />

09/30/z<br />

ffi|11m<br />

o3t11ln<br />

07113177<br />

07r13ln<br />

12t15lTl<br />

12115t77<br />

06n7n6<br />

12/31n7<br />

0g/15/7e<br />

10115t77<br />

EtNl77<br />

ory30/78<br />

0ry1fl70<br />

lw15tzi<br />

0901/74<br />

00/30/78<br />

07114177<br />

07t14tn<br />

w27t77<br />

wr27l77<br />

w19t7f<br />

wfiln<br />

ss<br />

50<br />

1S2<br />

36<br />

1S4<br />

386<br />

386<br />

85<br />

1,098<br />

83<br />

28<br />

1,292<br />

91<br />


'<br />

Program<br />

Code Tlil6<br />

Tabfe E 1. (Continuefl<br />

Funds Used<br />

(fhousands of Dollare)<br />

Contractor Stan Pr€.<br />

Contract Number Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 Fl TB<br />

3511EL Development of Dual Ma$ter Cylinder U.S. Army Meradcom,<br />

Stroke for Brake Fluids Ft. Belvoir<br />

DOT-H5-7-01760<br />

QgnA77<br />

ffit?A7g<br />

15<br />

3511EM Safety Research Lab. Brakes*$mall Various Ogl3}l77 N<br />

Purchases Various P.O.'s 0,9i30177<br />

351?AD Tire Break-in Procedures for Handling Texas A&M Research 06/30/75 125 31<br />

Tests Foundation<br />

DOT-HS-5-01189<br />

02128177<br />

3512AF Development of Vehicle Rollover Calspan Corporation 06/30/76 146<br />

Maneuver DOT-HS-6-01382 07131177<br />

3512AH Steering Controllability Characterlstlcs University of Michigan 06/30/76 SS I<br />

DOT"HS-6-01409 09t?1t77<br />

3512A1 Power Steering Failure Study Systems Technology, lnc. 06130,78 47<br />

DOT-HS-F01428 OEI3A77<br />

3512AK Mathematlcal Models for $imulation University of Michigan 0gl30l77 136<br />

of Vehicle Handling DOT-HS-7-01715 0113'1178<br />

351285 Handling Test Procedures for Passen- Systems Technology, lnc. 12115t76 50<br />

ger Cars Pulling Trallers DOT-HS-7-01548 cFi30l77<br />

35128V Solid State Data Acquisition and Pro- Systems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75 261 12<br />

cessing System DOT-HS-S01212 0212W77<br />

35128W Evaluation and Correlation of Driver/ $ystems Technology, Inc. 06/30/75 99 41<br />

Vehicle Data DOT-HS-5-01200 03131177<br />

35128X Influence of Aerodynamic Dlsturbance Systems Technology, Inc. 07120176 160 36<br />

on Vehicle Handling DOT-H$-6-0'1403 12131177<br />

35128Y Truck and Trailer Yaw Divergence and HSRI, University of Michigan 05119177 259<br />

Flollover DOT-HS"7-01602 11119178<br />

3512B,2 Transfer Test Vehicles Texas Transoortation lnstltute 01110177 I<br />

BL-L-0302144 01t10t77<br />

3512CF Support by the Hybrid Vehlcle Han' NHTSA, Office of Management Q3116177 116<br />

dling Program $ystems Ogl30l77<br />

ADP-77-065<br />

3512CK Mobile Parametrlc Measuremeni Dynamic Sclence, Inc. O?t1gt?B 12S 52<br />

Device DOT-HS-6-01413 1A3OI77<br />

3512CN ADP Support NHTSA, Office of Management 10/05/76 10<br />

Systems 09/30177<br />

ADP-77-053<br />

351?EA Accident Avoldance Capabllltles of Systems Tochnology, Inc. Ogl0glTI 90<br />

Mopeds DOT-HS-7-01719 111CFi78<br />

3512E8 Advanced Motorcycle Handling and South Coast Technology 0912W77 121<br />

Dynamics DOT-HS-7-01722 W2W78<br />

3512EC Development of Low Cost Antl-Lock Harry Diamond Lab.-Dept. of 1A02176 ,13<br />

Brake System for Small Motorcycles the Army<br />

DOT-HS.7.01524tA<br />

1210A77<br />

3512ED Motorcycle Handling Systems Technology, Inc. 07t22176 148 38<br />

DOT-HS-F01381 0a15t7g<br />

3512FA Hlghway Aerodynamlc Interference$ Virginia Polytechnic Inslltuie 04108,77 25<br />

DOT-HS-7-01590 0408t78<br />

E-14


Program<br />

Code<br />

Thlc<br />

3513CL TreadwearValidation<br />

3513m NDT Foad Correlation<br />

3513KA Truck Tlre Braklng and Cornering<br />

Traction StudY<br />

3513KE Safety Research Lab.<br />

Tires-$mall Purchases<br />

Table E 1. (Gontinued)<br />

,<br />

Contractol<br />

Contrac{ Humbor<br />

3512GA Aerodynamlc Disturbance Test Proc+ Systems Technology, Inc'<br />

dure DeveloPment<br />

DOT'HS'7-01716<br />

w30/77<br />

03/30/79<br />

3li12GB Car-TrailerHandllngStandards<br />

Development<br />

Systems TechnologY, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01720<br />

w?7t77<br />

111?7t78<br />

35138G Non-DestructiveTireTestlng Transportation System$ Centel 10/01/76<br />

PPA-HS-703<br />

ww77<br />

Nevada Auto Test C€nter<br />

DOT.HSff1347<br />

Hodges Transportation, Ino,<br />

DOT-HS-7-01589<br />

HSRI, University of Michigan<br />

DoT-HS-7-01609<br />

3513KC Modify Traction Information Processing Control Data Qorporation<br />

system (IlPs) PO'7'9630<br />

3513KD Tlre Treadwear TeBt Multlcycle Te$tlng Transportatlon Testlng' Inc.<br />

of Texas<br />

DOT-HS-7-01710<br />

Various<br />

Variou$<br />

3514A8 Vehicle Anti-Theft Security System A.D' Little' lnc.<br />

Design<br />

DOT-HS-7'01723<br />

3515AF Automotive Radar Research Dept' of Commerce<br />

DOT-HS-S01375<br />

3515AG Erectrrcar system rntesrrty<br />

t[TI[ l;:??'ft<br />

3515AH Electrical System Integrity Coleman Cadillac Co.<br />

Buy Cadillac Seville<br />

DOT'HS &01845<br />

3521AB Drlver Visibility Requirements Quallty Human Factors Research, Inc.<br />

of Visibility<br />

DOT'HS+01426<br />

35218F Evaluation of Glare from Followlng Rowland and Company<br />

Vehicle Headlights<br />

DOT'HS-7'01540<br />

3521CC Development of a visibility Research unlversity of calilornia, L-A.<br />

DOT-HS-+01451<br />

35210F Utlllty of Perlpheral Vlslon to Motor Ohio State Universlty<br />

Vehicle Drivers<br />

DOT-HS,S01203<br />

3521DG Critical Incldent Study of Vehicle Crash Dunlap and Assoclates<br />

Avoidance $ystems<br />

DoT-HS-5-01216<br />

3521DJ R€arview Mirror Systems for Pass. Cars, Vector Enterpri$es<br />

Lt. Trucks, and Multipurpose Pass. Veh. DOT-HS-7-01721<br />

3521DL Data Analyse$ of Drlver/Vehicle lnter- Vector Enterprises<br />

action Problems<br />

Po,7-3431<br />

Funds Usad<br />

(fhoueands of f}ollaru)<br />

Start Pre.<br />

Flnish FY 76 FY 76 F'{ Tl Ff 7E<br />

w14tn<br />

01/1fl78<br />

03tzsi.77<br />

03|/29/78<br />

3513CP Flnancial Support for the Second lnter- Transportation Research Board 12t17176<br />

nationalskidPreventionConference PO'7-3216<br />

12J17t78<br />

3513JC $now Tlre Test Program Nevada Auto Test Center<br />

DOT-HS-S01318<br />

1 1 /30/76<br />

0?i2w77<br />

3522AL Field Test Evaluation of Rear Lighting Essex Corporation<br />

and Slgnaling Systems<br />

DOT-HS'+01228<br />

Mlnl77<br />

02t22t78<br />

08t01177<br />

oStutn<br />

QgtO2l77<br />

03t03t78<br />

ffil3CIm<br />

w30t77<br />

wlw77<br />

0g/30/78<br />

07lozt7B<br />

07to1l77<br />

wr3a7l<br />

0s/3078<br />

121aot77<br />

1?12A77<br />

ofl30/76<br />

utw77<br />

11t23116<br />

wt2a77<br />

ost28177<br />

07131t77<br />

o6t23175<br />

07131t77<br />

06/19/75<br />

ozlA&t77<br />

w28177<br />

092979<br />

Mt26t77<br />

07t26t77<br />

06/30/75<br />

w31177<br />

64<br />

100<br />

353<br />

23<br />

75<br />

95<br />

45<br />

132 40<br />

201<br />

1S<br />

250<br />

58<br />

111<br />

10<br />

100<br />

10<br />

83<br />

56<br />

116<br />

155<br />

33<br />

15<br />

't78<br />


Program<br />

Code<br />

Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />

Funds Usod<br />

(Ihousands ol Dollars)<br />

Contractor Start Pre-<br />

Crontract Numbsr Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

3522AN Dev. and Field Testing of Techniques H$Rl, University of Michigan Q212A177 76 108<br />

for Increasing Conspicuity of Motorcycles<br />

and Motorcycle Drivers<br />

DOT-HS-6-01459 QW16l77<br />

3522AO Evaluation of the Feasibillty of a University of Michigan 1A2?176 61<br />

Single Beam Headlight DOT-HS-7-01554 01122178<br />

3522AP Low Beam Shaping for lmproved Wlde Human Factor$ Research<br />

Angle Roadway lllumination Corporation<br />

DOT-H5-7-01724<br />

09114177<br />

11114178<br />

79<br />

35228H Validation of the Rear Lighting and Allen Corp. of America Wl3Ol77 40 60<br />

Signaling System Fleld Test DOT-HS-7-01756 05/30/79<br />

3522CC Field Test Evaluation of Rear Lighting University of lllinols 09/16/76 179 /m<br />

Deceleration Signals DOT-HS-6-01447 05/16/78<br />

3522EA Signal Lighting Requirements for Emer- Unlversity of Michigan 09/1476 50<br />

gency Schoolbus and Service Vehicles DOT-H$-6-01468 09114177<br />

3522E8 Analytical Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Franklln Institute @120176 49 5<br />

Fog Countermeasures DOT-HS-F0149S 12116177<br />

35?3AP Human Factors Requiremente for Wayne State Universlty 07114177 S1 10<br />

Flngertlp Reach Controls DOT-HS"5-01 192 0fl31177<br />

3523AQ Driver-Vehicle Effectiveness Model Honeywell, Inc. 03/1fl76 128<br />

Phases ll and lll DOT-HS-6-01319 ffi1fr178<br />

3523AS Development of Recommendatlons to Man Factors, Inc. 0nZA76 83 2<br />

lmprove Control Operability DOT-HS-S01445 1112?J77<br />

35?3AT Development of a Standardized Vehi- Planning and Human $y$tems, 11/30/76 80<br />

cle ldentification Number Inc.<br />

DOT-H5-7-01541<br />

Qgl30l77<br />

3523AX VIN Experiment Servlco$ California Dept. of Motor 0Fr1fr177 1<br />

Vehicles<br />

PO-7-3574<br />

08130177<br />

3523AY Buy Replacement Bulbs General Electrlc Company 02128t77


Program<br />

Code Tltlo<br />

Table E-1. (Contlnued)<br />

Conlractor<br />

Contraa Numbar<br />

3523FO Modification to DPMAS Data Process- NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/76<br />

Ing<br />

System$<br />

ADF-77-070<br />

09t30t77<br />

3523FQ Computer Terminal for DPMA$<br />

3532AA ADF Support for Automotlve Fuel<br />

Economy Research<br />

3532A8 Rental and Installatlon Computer<br />

Device Model 1132<br />

3532AG Support for Analytical Tools for AFE<br />

Activities<br />

3532AD Support for Analytlcal Tools for AFE<br />

Activities<br />

35328A AFER Program Support-T$G<br />

3532DA Fleview Procedure lor Determlnlng<br />

Average Fuel Economy<br />

3534AA Corporate Strategles of Automotive<br />

Manufacturers<br />

3534A8 Corporate Strategies of Automotlve<br />

Manufacturers<br />

3535AA lmpact of Auto Fuel Economy Stand. Charles Biver Assoc.<br />

ards on Competition in the AutomotlveDOT.HS-7-01786<br />

lndustry<br />

3535A8 lmpact of Auto Fuel Economy Stand- A. T. Kearney<br />

ards on Competition in the AutomotiveDOT-HS-7-01787<br />

lndustry<br />

353588 Consumer Behavlor Towards Fuel Effi.<br />

cient Vehicles<br />

35358C Consumer Behavior Towards Fuel Efficlent<br />

Vehicles<br />

353580 Consumer Behavior Towards Fuel Etflcient<br />

Vehicles<br />

3535CA lmpacts ot Fuel Efflclent Vehlcles<br />

3541AA Truck, Bus, and Motorcycle Safety<br />

Status Methodology<br />

Texas Institute<br />

PO-7.3550<br />

NHTSA, Off ice of Management10/01/76<br />

Systems<br />

09130t77<br />

ADP-77-072<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management10/01/76<br />

Systems<br />

ogt3il77<br />

PO-7-3462<br />

H.H. Aerospace Deslgn<br />

Company<br />

DOT-HS-7-01691<br />

Transportation Systems Center 10101t76<br />

PPA.HS.727<br />

w30t77<br />

3532CA Augmentation of Res. and Anal. Capa- Corporate Tech. Planning<br />

bllities for TimelY Support ol AFE DOT-H5-7-01789<br />

Activities<br />

3532C8 Augmentation of Res. and Anal. Capa- South Coast<br />

bilities for Timely Support of AFE<br />

Activities<br />

DOT-HS-7-01790<br />

Envlronmgntal lrnpact Csnter<br />

DOT-HS-7-01771<br />

Harbridge House, lnc.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01783<br />

Futures Group<br />

DOT-HS-7-01784<br />

35358A Consumer Behavior Toward$ Fuel Effi- Charles River A$$oc.<br />

cient Vehicles<br />

DoT-Hs-7-01779<br />

Cambridge Systematics<br />

DOT-HS-7-01780<br />

Market Fact8<br />

DOT-HS-7-01781<br />

National Analysts<br />

DOT-HS.7-01782<br />

Gharles River Assoc.<br />

ooT.Hs-7-01778<br />

Indians University Foundation 06/30/76<br />

DOT-HS-Fo1357<br />

o$t30177<br />

Funds Used<br />

(thousands ol Dollars)<br />

Start Pre.<br />

Flnith FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 7A<br />

ffit24177<br />

Q6t24177<br />

@106t77<br />

09/06/78<br />

Automated Sciences GrouP, Inc. @to7tTl<br />

DoT-HS.7-01708<br />

09107t78<br />

09t3w77<br />

0s/30/78<br />

09/30/77<br />

0s/30/78<br />

wwrT<br />

03/31/79<br />

09130177<br />

03/31/79<br />

QSt30t77<br />

03t30t79<br />

09130t77<br />

03/31/79<br />

wwzl<br />

03/31/79<br />

09t30t77<br />

03131179<br />

09t30t77<br />

03/31/79<br />

09t30177<br />

03131175<br />

w30177<br />

03/31/79<br />

09130t77<br />

03131175<br />

139<br />

20<br />

110<br />

#<br />

48<br />

4,600<br />

N7<br />

249<br />

1afi<br />

50<br />

50<br />

190<br />

212<br />

159<br />

210<br />

93<br />

142<br />

184<br />

E-17


Program<br />

Code TItle<br />

S5ltlAC ADP Support<br />

3541AD ADP Support<br />

3541EA Salety Status Data Collectlon Methodology<br />

3541EC On-Road Vehicle Failure Study-Data<br />

Analysis<br />

3541ED State PMVI Program Evaluation<br />

3541FA Vehicles-ln-Use Sub-Llmlt Maneuvers<br />

3541FF MVI Evaluation and Data Analy$i$<br />

3541FG Multl-Vehlcle Program, Vehicles-ln-Use<br />

$ub-Limit Maneuver, Spring Spacers<br />

3541FH Computer Support Effort by Hybrid<br />

Vehicle Handling Program<br />

3542DC Optimized Brake Inspection<br />

3542DD Correlation of Braking System Defect$<br />

and Performance Insoection<br />

3542DF Tire Inspection Machine Completion<br />

and Validation<br />

3542DH Modification to CSC Technical Support<br />

Contract<br />

3551AA Advanced Flecorder Design Development<br />

3551AC IBM 545 Output Keypunch Rental<br />

3$51AD Advanc€d Recorder Design Developmenl<br />

3611AE Engineering Support to tho R$V<br />

3631AG FlBsearch Safety Vehicle Phase ll<br />

3631AH Research Safety Vehicle Phase ll<br />

3E31AJ Flesearch Safety Vehicle Phase lll<br />

3631AK Flos€arch Safety Vehicle Phase lll,<br />

Minicars<br />

E.l8<br />

Table E.l. (Continue0<br />

Contractor<br />

Contract Number<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management o3lo8l77<br />

Systems<br />

03108177<br />

ADP-76-001<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management10/0fl76<br />

Sy$tems<br />

wl3u77<br />

ADP-77-052<br />

AVCO Systems Dlvlslon<br />

DOT-HS-s-01159<br />

U.S. SBA Opportunlty Sysiemg 03/01/75<br />

DOT"HS-5-01063<br />

09t15t77<br />

Chilton Company<br />

DOT-H5-7-01544<br />

Systems Technology, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-5-01191<br />

Automated Sciences GrouP,<br />

Inc, (SBA)<br />

DOT-HS-S01338<br />

Systems Technology, Inc.<br />

DOT-H5-7-01799<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management 10/01/78<br />

Systems<br />

09/30/78<br />

ADP-7-8105<br />

Ultrasystems, Inc,<br />

DOT-H$-Fo1383<br />

University of Tennesseo<br />

DOT-HS-7-01621<br />

$outhwest Research ln$t.<br />

DOT-H5-7-01693<br />

Computer Sciences Corp,<br />

DOT-H5-5-01036<br />

Teledyne Geo. Tech.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01641<br />

$ystemg<br />

PO-7-3195<br />

i<br />

Dynamic $cience, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01640<br />

Transportation Systems Center<br />

PPA HS"717<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-5-01214<br />

Minicars, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-5-01215<br />

Cal$pan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-7-01551<br />

Minicars, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-7-01552<br />

Funde Ueed<br />

(Thousands<br />

ol Dollars)<br />

Start Pre-<br />

Finish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

1212't176<br />

05t31t77<br />

o3l07l77<br />

03107178<br />

01l1w77<br />

0428177<br />

01131177<br />

03131177<br />

09t3il77<br />

03/31/79<br />

06t29t76<br />

1ATr77<br />

06t07177<br />

ffito7t7B<br />

09/28/77<br />

11t28177<br />

11105174<br />

08104177<br />

ffit29177<br />

ffit29l7B<br />

NHTSA, Office of Management 12109176<br />

01101177<br />

ffit?f,fil<br />

ffit?s,/78<br />

10t01176<br />

w30/77<br />

07116t75<br />

w15177<br />

07t16175<br />

01t31177<br />

ffitoN77<br />

10t26t78<br />

ffit08177<br />

01t2H79<br />

152<br />

12<br />

189<br />

981<br />

78<br />

70<br />

72<br />

176<br />

1,75Q 3,138<br />

1,845 3,359<br />

12<br />

36<br />

37<br />

15<br />

202<br />


Table E 1. (Contlnued)<br />

(rrr""::l#<br />

lif"rr","r<br />

Program Contractor Stert Pte<br />

Code Tttle Conlrac{ Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 78<br />

3631AN1 GFE-Two 77 Chevrolet 4-door lmpalas Holiday Olds Company<br />

for Crash Testlng RSV Phase ll Minl- PO'7'4521<br />

cars Mod.4 Requirement<br />

01127177<br />

01127177<br />

6<br />

3ffi1ANe GFE-Two 77 Chevrolet 4-door lmpalas Holiday Olds Company<br />

for Crash Testing RSV Phase ll Mini- PO'74522<br />

cars Mod.4 Requirement<br />

12107176<br />

01127177<br />

6<br />

36II1AP GFE-4 Chevrolet lmpala Care Varlous<br />

Various<br />

06/30/77<br />

06130177<br />

11<br />

3631A0 Purchase Five Honda Civic Cars Various O7tW77 6<br />

Various 07lOEt77<br />

3662AU Shipment and Preservation of Govern- Minicars, Inc. 01110177 2<br />

ment Owned Test Equipment INV'106+1 01110177<br />

366388l Transport of Government Proparly North Amerlcan Van Llnss 0/'I?W77 4<br />

8/1030199 04t2a77<br />

3663882 Transport of Government Property North American Van Lines 04l2fln


Program<br />

Code Tlrla<br />

Table Fl' (continued)<br />

Funda used<br />

(fhousande ol Dottarr)<br />

Conlractor Start Pre.<br />

Contract Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY 76 FY f7 FY 78<br />

37138Y Optimum lntegration Algorithm into CHI Associates QBl27l77 48<br />

Structural Analysis Programs DOT-HS-7.01620 00127178<br />

3713C8 Evaluation of Flollover Procedures Dynamic Science, lnc. 07/01176 71 10<br />

DOT-HS-6-01427 07tl1t77<br />

3713GE Llghtweight Subcompact Side $tructure The Budd Company O411il77 498 140<br />

DOT-HS-7-01588 10/1378<br />

3713GG Purchase of Cars for Slde lmpact Various Dealers O7lffil77 34<br />

Testing Various P.O.'s 0711W77<br />

3713KD Data Processlng for Contract DOT"H$ NHTSA, Offlce of Manegement 10/01/76 160<br />

7-01628 Systems<br />

ADP-77-050<br />

Wl3rl/77<br />

3713LF Vehlcle Aggressiveness and Crash Approved Engineerlng Test 03/18f/8 n<br />

Survivablllty Characteristics Labs<br />

DOT-HS-F01477<br />

03/18/78<br />

3713LG Vehicle Aggressiverress and Crash Dynamic Science, Inc. Ogt1W77 29<br />

$urvivability Characteristics OOT-HS-6-01478 03/1&,78<br />

3714AF Evaluation of Structural Aggresslve- Calspan Corporation 02128175 181 158 204 I<br />

ness of Intermediate Size Automobiles DOT-H$-+010S9 Q5131177<br />

3714AH Dev. of Test Anal. Methodologies for Dynamlc Science, Inc. 0F/30177 90<br />

Eval. Crash Compatibilities and<br />

Aggressiveness<br />

DOT-HS-7-01758 0S/30/78<br />

3714AM Buy Cars to Support Task Orders for Varioue 0il26177 44 18<br />

Car-To-Car and Car-to-Barrier lmpact<br />

Testing<br />

Various P.O.'s 0512d77<br />

3714AR Purchase Cars Varlous Oilfiln 40<br />

Various 03121177<br />

3715AD Buy Minicomputer Modem Equipment Digital Equipment Corp. 1AOH7E 1<br />

PO-7-3146 12/0d76<br />

3715AE Buy Minicomputer Peripheral Equip- Digital Equipment Corp. 07129177 53<br />

ment PO-7-3628 07129177<br />

3716A8 lmproved Vlslblllty for School Buses Ultrasystems, Inc. Cf,./17t7} S0<br />

During Adverse Weather DOT-HS-6-01398 06117177<br />

3716AC ldentification of Superior Energy"<br />

. Absorbing Materials for School Bus<br />

lnteriors<br />

A$L Englneering, Inc.<br />

DOT-HS-7-016M<br />

OBlO3l77<br />

08/03/78<br />

1#l<br />

3716AD $chool Bus Occupani Retroflt Protec- New Mexico State Univ. WOTln<br />

tive Materials DOT-HS-7-01572 O2lO7l7A<br />

3716AF Cra$h Protection $ystems for Handi- Minicars, Inc. Wfiln<br />

capped school Bus occupants DOT-HS-7-01774 03/01/79<br />

3716AG Defogging Test Procedures Valldatlon Approved Engineerlng Testing 07126177<br />

Laboratory 0712W77<br />

371EBA Transportation Ftre safety Prosram ;:-""t:l--^avanced rech- o1tz7t7o E0<br />

nology Divisfon<br />

DOT-HS-FOI313IA<br />

Q1127177<br />

3721DH Web Locker Tests in Torinos Allied Chemical Corp. Ogt31l77<br />

Automotive Product Div.<br />

PO-7 3384<br />

03131177<br />

E.20<br />

62<br />

70<br />

10<br />

10


Program<br />

Code<br />

Tlllc<br />

Table El. (Contlnuedl<br />

Funds Used<br />

(Thougsnds<br />

of D,ollars)<br />

Conlractor Start Pre-<br />

Contrac{ Number Flnlsh FY 76 FY fO FY 77 FY 78<br />

3722AD Evaluatlon of GM Air flushion Restraint Calspan Corporation 0812W74 97 39 13<br />

Svstem DoT-HS-s01017 1ail176<br />

3722AE Vehicle Integratlon and Evaluatlon oi Dynamic Science, Inc. 03112176 83 85<br />

Passive Small Car Fle$traint Systems DOT-HS-F01307 1A15177<br />

3722A1 Solid Propellant Inflation System for Minicars, Inc. 0712A76 337<br />

Inflatable Festraints for Subcompact$ DOT-HS-S01384 07128178<br />

3722AL Basic Ordering Agreement Evaluation Galspan Corporation<br />

of Occupant Protectlon Devices and DOT-HS-6-01470<br />

Re8traint $ystems<br />

'l1l11l7B<br />

11111177<br />

3722AM Purchase Cars for Test various 02114177 ?7<br />

Various Q2114177<br />

3722AN R€stralnt System Ferformance Evalua- Dynamic Science, Inc. 11123178 63<br />

tion of ACR$ Equipped Volvo Sedans DOT-HS-7-01542<br />

'11123177<br />

3722AP Restraint System Performance Evalua- Various Ogl15l77 66<br />

tion of ACRS Equipped Volvo Sedans- Various<br />

Buy Cars<br />

W11fl77<br />

3722AQ Evaluation of Occupant Protectlon De Varlous<br />

vices and Re$traint Systems-<br />

Buy Cars<br />

Various Orders Q7111177<br />

3722AR Hlgh Spesd Data Communicatlon Office of Management $ys- 11/15/76 3<br />

Printer tems. General Electric<br />

P+7-3121<br />

11115178<br />

3722Af Purchase 1973 Chevrolet Fleet Test<br />

Cars (6 Vehicles)<br />

PH&H, Baltimore, Md.<br />

PO-7-456o<br />

O2lQ4l77<br />

Q21o4177<br />

I<br />

3722AU Integrated Vehicle Colllslon/Occupant General Electrlc Info. Services 04104177<br />

'lB<br />

Model Sales Deot.<br />

DOT-OS-60058<br />

07123177<br />

3722AV Data Processing Service NHT$A, Office of Management 10/01/76 20<br />

$ystems<br />

ADP-77-089<br />

Wl3A77<br />

g722AYAdvancedPassiveHe3traints|nt+Vo|voofAmerica12]o7l77<br />

gration Fo-e5020 12lo7ln<br />

3722M Purchase 1977 Simca 1308GT Chrysler Corporation ffi117177 5<br />

FG7-4715 0g2?J77<br />

37228M Dev. of Aspiratlon Inflatlon Technique Calspan Corporatlon 06/30/75 186 210<br />

for Subcompact Passenger Car DOT-HS-$01254 WW77<br />

37228N Instalt Driver Alr Bag and Column in Dynamic $cience, Inc. 03/0fl75 61 128 74<br />

Oldsmobile DOT-HS-S01104 WI3OI77<br />

3722ElR $mall Car Driver Inflatable Restralnt Minicars, lnc. CEOA76 149 128 74<br />

System Evaluation DOT-HS-F01412 05/31/78<br />

g722BS Subcompact Vehicle Energy-Absorblng Minicars, Inc. 00/1fl76 111 56<br />

Steering Column Evaluation and lmprovement<br />

Phase ll<br />

OOT-HS-S01449 0315/78<br />

37228U Buy Cars for Use on Aeplratlon Inlla- Delawere Motors (1975 Volvo) Uilnm 5<br />

tion Teohnlque study Po-7-4604 0?/21177<br />

37228V Small Car Driver Inflatable Restraint Various Contractors O312il77 42<br />

System Evaluation Various Ogl25l77<br />

141<br />

E-21


Progrsm<br />

Code Tlrl€<br />

37228W Subcompact Vehicle Energy Absorbing<br />

Steering Column Evaluation and<br />

lmprovement<br />

37228X Buy Vehicles-Energy Absorbing<br />

Steering Column Evaluation and<br />

lmprovement<br />

3722FA Purchase of Cars for Evaluation of<br />

OccuPant Protection Devices<br />

3723CF1 Buy VIP-95 Dummie$<br />

3723CFZ BUY VIP-95 Dummies<br />

3723CG Buy VIP-3C Dummie$<br />

3723CH Buy Sierra Dummies<br />

3723C1 Buy Alderson Dumml€s<br />

3724AG Development and Evaluatlon of a<br />

Forc+Limiter {or Belt Restraint<br />

$Ystems<br />

g724AH Buy Films-MVP Contract<br />

3724AJ Obtaln HSRI Software Package<br />

3724AK Belt Restraint System for Small Gars<br />

Using Force Limiting<br />

3731AJ Mass Distribution Characterlstlcs of<br />

Living Human Beings<br />

3731AK Crash Vlctim Simulator Data<br />

3731AL Experimental Data for Valldatlng<br />

Finite Ele Model of Thoraclc Skeletal<br />

Flesponse<br />

3731AM Mass Distribution Characteristics o{<br />

Children<br />

3731 BL Mouthoiece Accelerometer and Rotational<br />

Acceleration Calihrator<br />

37318M Perfermance Evaluation of Part 572<br />

Dummy<br />

37318N Mouthoiece Accelerometer and Rotational<br />

Acceleration Calibrator<br />

373180 Estab. Msmt. Meth. & Calib. Capablllty<br />

of Dual Rate of Turn Table<br />

37318P Safety Fesearch Lab-Restraints<br />

Small Purchases<br />

E-22<br />

Table E-l. (Contlnue0<br />

Contractor<br />

Contract Number<br />

Blrmingham University 1?11fl76<br />

Birmingham, England<br />

PO-7-3213<br />

12115177<br />

Riverside Chrysler Plymouth C€/29177<br />

PO-7"4732<br />

o9t29t77<br />

Various Dealers<br />

Various<br />

Alderson Besearch Lab.<br />

PO-7-3250<br />

Alderson Research Lab.<br />

PO-7-3331<br />

Alderson Research Lab.<br />

PO-7-3?52<br />

Sierra Engineering<br />

PO-8-0007<br />

Alderson Resoarch Lab.<br />

Varlous<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS-S01469<br />

Funds Used<br />

(Thousands<br />

of Dollars)<br />

Stsrt Pre-<br />

Finish FY 76 FY 7B FY 77 FY 78<br />

w20t77<br />

o&t20t77<br />

01117177<br />

01t17t77<br />

0s/24ft7<br />

oa24t77<br />

01'/1477<br />

01112177<br />

11125177<br />

11t25t77<br />

1Qt27t77<br />

10127177<br />

09/30/76<br />

09/30/77<br />

Dynamic Science, Inc. 07113176<br />

DOT-HS-6-01360 01101t77<br />

HSRI, University of Michigan 10/29/76<br />

DOT-Hs-7-0'rs25 11130177<br />

Calspan Corporation OBl2d77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01679 08t2d78<br />

Wright-PattersonAirForce 05/06/76<br />

Base<br />

DOT-HS-S01332<br />

11lOEl77<br />

USAF Aerospace Medical 05/05/76<br />

Research<br />

DOT-HS-6-01331<br />

OElOil77<br />

HSRI, University of Michigan 07129177<br />

DOT-HS-7-01636 07129t78<br />

FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute 04/14/76<br />

DOT-HS-S-01353<br />

12t31177<br />

B&K Instruments<br />

PO-7-3599<br />

Sangamo Electric<br />

PO-7-3585<br />

B & K Instruments<br />

Po-7-3601<br />

07t1w77<br />

07t19t77<br />

QH29t77<br />

Mr29177<br />

07119177<br />

07t19t77<br />

National Bureau of $tandards O7lO1l77<br />

DOT-Hs-7-01709<br />

Variou$<br />

Variou$<br />

09130177<br />

09t3u77<br />

24<br />

68<br />

37<br />

70<br />

10<br />


Program<br />

Code Ttilc<br />

3731C0 Crash Protection Human Factors lnstrumentation<br />

for Human Tolerance<br />

3732AH lnstrumentation of First Thoracic Vertebra<br />

of Cadavers<br />

Table E.l. (Continued)<br />

Conlraclor<br />

C;ontract Numbor<br />

3732AM TaskOrder-MultivariateModelingAdaptronlcs,<br />

Inc. O5l1W77<br />

and Analysis<br />

DOT-HS-F01365 11126177<br />

3732AO Response of Human Surrogates in<br />

$ide lmpact<br />

37328L Head Model and lnfury Crlterla Devel-<br />

0pment<br />

37328N Neck lnlury Assessment Protocol<br />

37328Q Computerization of Head and Neck<br />

Injury Information<br />

g732BR Head Injury Workshop Support<br />

3732DC Injury Study of the Femur-Pelvic Bone<br />

Gomplex in Automobile Crash<br />

Environment<br />

3732E0 Quantification of the Thoraclc<br />

Response and Injury<br />

3732E1 C,omoliance Characteristics of Human<br />

Chest During Cardiopulmonary<br />

Resuscitation<br />

3732EK<br />

3732E1<br />

37334J<br />

Purchase of Accelerometers<br />

Kinematlc and Kinetic Qharacterizatlon<br />

of the Human Neck-ll<br />

3733AN Valldatlon of Crash Vlctlm Simulator<br />

3733AO Kinesiology of the Human Shoulder<br />

and $pine<br />

3733AT Develop Approx, Solutions for CVS<br />

Program and Dummy Design Information<br />

37stilAU<br />

3733AW<br />

Contact-lmpact Problems<br />

Data Processing Services for In-House NHTSA, Off ice of<br />

Usage<br />

Systems<br />

ADP-77-offi<br />

Transportation Systems Center 10/0'l/76<br />

PPA-HS-710 09/30/77<br />

New Mexico State Unlv. 06/30/76<br />

DOT-HS-+01400 06t30177<br />

New Mexico State Unlv. Ogl30l77<br />

DOT.HS-7.01773 09/30/78<br />

Civil Engineering Lab, Naval 04112177<br />

Cost Battalion<br />

DOT-HS-5-01132 |<br />

03/31/78<br />

Los Angeles Co-Forenslc<br />

Science Lab.<br />

DOT-HS-6-01476<br />

Funds Used<br />

(Ihousands<br />

of Dollarc)<br />

Start Pre'<br />

Flnish FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY r8<br />

0SEOr/t<br />

03tw77<br />

Naval Civil Engineering Lab. 0912W77<br />

DOT-HS-741732 03t26t77<br />

HSRI, University of Mlchlgan 07108177<br />

PO-7-3583 07tOBt77<br />

Wayne State University 09lWn<br />

DOT-H$7{1785 03/31/80<br />

HSRI, University of Michigan 0efl5|/4<br />

DOT.HS-4-009?1 05/01/7E<br />

Johns Hopkins Univ. School<br />

of Ml19l77<br />

Medicine 04/19/78<br />

DOT-HS-7{1s69<br />

Quantif ication of Occupant Reeponse University of Heidelberg<br />

and Injury from lmpact<br />

(Germany)<br />

DOT-HS-+01063<br />

Endevco, Inc,<br />

PO-7-3684<br />

U.S, Naval Aerospace Medical<br />

Research Lab.<br />

DOT-Hs-7-016471A<br />

Calspan Corporatlon<br />

DOT-HS-01300<br />

Wayne State Univer$ity<br />

DOT-HS-S01232<br />

Calspan Corporation<br />

DOT-HS+01410<br />

University of Cal ifornia,<br />

Berkeley<br />

DOT-HS S014{t<br />

o'Io?t75<br />

03/30/BO<br />

Mt17m<br />

08t17t77<br />

06128ln<br />

ffit2u77<br />

01121176<br />

07t?1t77<br />

06/30/75<br />

ffitw77<br />

08/05/76<br />

oztffit78<br />

07119176<br />

03/31/78<br />

Management 10/01/76<br />

ogt30t77<br />

132<br />

278<br />

389 12<br />

19<br />

200<br />

201<br />

117<br />

35<br />

20<br />

400<br />

179<br />

98<br />

59<br />

25<br />

61<br />

135<br />

39<br />

90<br />

215<br />

56<br />

zffi<br />

68 11


Program<br />

Code Tltle<br />

Table E 1. (Contlnue0<br />

Conlractor<br />

Gontract Numbar<br />

3733M Anatomical Cross-$ectionalGeometryGeorgetown<br />

University Ogl23l77<br />

and Mass Distribution for Children DOT-HS-7-01661 09/23/78<br />

3733AY Data for Validation of Crash Victim<br />

Simulator<br />

37338A Occupant Slde lmpact $lmulation<br />

Uslng GVS Program<br />

3735A1 Pedestrian lmpacts: Baseline and Pr+<br />

llminary Concepts Evaluation<br />

3735AN Rear lmpact Protection Studles<br />

3735AO Response of Human Surrogates in Air<br />

Bag Steering Column SYStems<br />

3737AJ Buy Rate Gyro<br />

Calspan Corporatlon 09130177<br />

DOT-HS-7-01660 09/30/78<br />

Unfverslty of Mlchigan Ogl30l77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01659 Q3/30/79<br />

Battelle Memorial Institute Q2l2Bl77 242<br />

DOT-HS-4-00961<br />

06130177<br />

New Mexico State Unlv. 09/30/77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01772<br />

09/30/78<br />

Wayne State University Qgl30l77<br />

DOT-HS-7-01792 09/30/78<br />

Hamilton $tandard 1407ft6<br />

PO-7-3197<br />

12107176<br />

Funde Used<br />

(Ihoueande sl Dollars)<br />

Start Pre-<br />

Flnfsh FY 76 FY 76 FY 77 FY 76<br />

68<br />

s0<br />

49<br />

68<br />

36<br />

40<br />

50<br />

90<br />

200<br />

200


LITIGATION: CALENDAR ts77<br />

I. SUPREME COURT<br />

B. F. Goodrich v. DOT. On March 21, lgii, the Supreme<br />

Court denied the request of eight tire rnanufacturers<br />

to review the September Z, 19j6, decision of the<br />

6th Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the principal<br />

provisions of the Uniform Tire euality Grading Standards.<br />

II. COURTOFAPPEALS<br />

PACCAR, Inc. v, NHTSA. (9th Circuit). plaintiffs on<br />

January 3, 1975, filed petitions tbr review of FMVSS<br />

No. l2l, Air Broke Sptems, alleging the Standard to be<br />

invalid, The Court of Appeals heard argumenr on<br />

July 6, 1976, on the matter ancl has not yet rendercd a<br />

decision.<br />

United Slate,r v. Generpl Motors Corporation. (D.C.<br />

Circuit). In June 1977, the Court of Appeals hetd that<br />

thc defective pitman arms in Igjg-l960 Cadiltacs relate<br />

to motor vehicle safety. A lower court held that the risk<br />

presented by these components was not unreasonable.<br />

GM is seeking an appeal in the Supreme Court.<br />

Ceneral Motors Carporation v. Brinegar; Llnited States<br />

v. General Motors Corporation. (Circuit Courr of ,4ppeals<br />

for the District of Columbia). In October 1977, the<br />

Circuit Court upheld the vatidity of a NHTSA order<br />

that Ceneral Motors notify owners of a defect in the fuel<br />

inlet plugs installed in some 2'14,W) 1965-1966 Chevrolets<br />

and Buicks. Plug failurc coulcl result in fire.<br />

Standard Forge and Axle Company v. Coleman. (Circuit<br />

Courl af Appeals for the District of Columbia). petitioners<br />

sought review of FMVSS No. l2l, Air Brake<br />

S},,sl€ras. The Government successfully moved the District<br />

Court to dismiss petitioner's case (order filed September<br />

26, 1975). Petitioner's appeal was rejected.<br />

United States v. Fard Motor Company. (Circuil Caurt<br />

of Appeals for the District of Cotumbia). In August<br />

1975 NHTSA filed an enforssrnsrl action seekine<br />

to<br />

compel Ford to notify owners and remedy defective 1968<br />

and 1969 Mustangs and Cougars. Failure of the front<br />

buckct scats in these vehicles could result in accident,<br />

injury, or death. The District Court granted the Government's<br />

motion for summary judgment on October l,<br />

1976, and is expected to order the company to provide<br />

the remedy and notification sought by the Government.<br />

Ford's appeal is pending.<br />

TEBDA v. NHTSA. (6th Circuit). On February 7, 1917,<br />

the court granted NHTSA's rnotion to dismiss this case<br />

for lack of jurisdiction. TEBDA had sought to sray an<br />

effective date of FMVS$ No. l0l -75, Fue! System Integrity,<br />

and review of NHTSA's denial of an administrative<br />

petition to delay the effcctive date.<br />

III. DISTRICT COURT<br />

United Stafes v. Ford Motor Company. (District Court<br />

for the Distriil of Columbia). On January 7, 1976, thl<br />

Government commenced an entbrcement action against<br />

Ford to compel it to notify approximately 175,000 owners<br />

of I97l-1973 Mercury Capris. The Covernment contends<br />

that thcsc vehicles contain a defect in the windshield<br />

wiper systems which could cause the wipers to fail<br />

during normal operation in adverse weather conditions.<br />

The case is pencling.<br />

Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Coleman;<br />

United States v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company.<br />

(Northern Distritt of Ahio). On Augusr 13, 1975, Firestone<br />

filed under the Freedom of Information Act to<br />

obtain information it allegedly needed in connection<br />

with a pending NHTSA invesrigation. NHTSA resisted<br />

the suit on thc grounds that the information sought is<br />

exempt from disclosurc unclcr the Freedom of Information<br />

Act. The District Court ruled that certain informa_<br />

tion was subject to disclosure. An additional suit filed<br />

by the Covcrnmcnt rcgarditrg alleged noncornpliance of<br />

certain Firestonc tires with FMVSS No. I09, pessen3er<br />

Car Tires, was withdrawn when evidence was cleveloped<br />

indicating insufficiency of the allegations.<br />

Koehring Compony v. Adums. (Eastern Dktrict of ltisconsin).<br />

In this suit, several manufacturers of mobile<br />

cranes and similar mobile construction cquipment seek a<br />

F-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!