Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System
Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System
374 Dorchen A. Leidholdt such as swinging and anal sex, that their previous female partners had refused. When the internet brides also refused, they were raped; when they fled, the men pursued new “brides” over the internet. When internet marriages turn violent, victims need the same kinds of protection as other battered women. Explore with your client the possibility of calling the police to initiate a criminal prosecution and obtain a criminal order of protection. Also discuss with her the advantages and disadvantages of filing for a civil order of protection in family court or as part of the interim relief in a matrimonial action. Like women and girls who have been prostituted, victims of the internet bride trade are often subjected to misogynistic stereotypes. The popular media and commercial movies have portrayed the internet bride as a gold-digging “Natasha,” in pursuit of a green card, who preys on vulnerable, lovelorn American men. Interviews with victims represented by Sanctuary for Famlies reveal that the women, several of whom came with their children, genuinely hoped for warm, loving, and supportive husbands with whom they could build families. Their new husbands, by contrast, were often sex industry consumers; several were substance abusers or mentally ill. Often the men portrayed a falsely wholesome and affluent picture of their lives in the United States that induced their victims to give up apartments and jobs in their home countries. Soon after they arrived, the women were confronted with a depressing and violent reality — along with threats that unless they complied with all of their husband-to-be’s demands they would be forever undocumented and subject to deportation. You should be prepared to confront the derogatory stereotypes of internet brides and educate the court and any other key players in your case about the reality of your client’s situation. Unless challenged, these stereotypes will undercut your client’s credibility and increase the difficulty of persuading authorities to pursue appropriate action, such as prosecuting her American husband for marital rape or granting her immigration protection. Even when their husbands refuse to serve as their immigration sponsors, internet brides are likely to be eligible for immigration law relief. Women who can establish that they married their American husbands in good faith and were subjected to battering or extreme cruelty are usually eligible either to apply for battered spouse waivers or to self-petition under the Violence Against Women Act. Internet brides subjected by their husbands to forced labor or sexual exploitation through fraud, force, or coercion may be able to establish the requirements of “severe trafficking” under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. If they are willing to cooperate with the investigation and prosecution of a
From Sex Trafficking to FGM: Emerging Issues 375 trafficking case and they face “extreme hardship” in their home countries, they may be eligible for “T Visas.” Internet brides who have suffered substantial physical or mental abuse as the result of crimes committed against them by their husbands, such as rape and domestic violence, and who cooperate with the investigation and prosecution of these crimes are eligible for U Visas. Early Marriage and Forced Marriage You may discover that your client was betrothed and married as a child and/or was forced into a marriage against her will. Forced marriage and child marriage are most likely to occur in countries in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia. 19 These marriages should be distinguished from arranged marriages, where family matchmakers recommend but do not impose eligible suitors on marriage-aged sons and daughters. Immigrant parents from traditional societies who are worried about the westernization and assimilation of their daughters may take them back to their home countries, perhaps on the pretext of a vacation, and force them into marriages. Lawyers at Sanctuary for Families helped a Bangladeshi high school student, whose parents were trying to force her into an unwanted marriage, obtain a civil order of protection against them and legal emancipation. Sanctuary’s legal staff also represented a Palestinian-American teenager, whose father had forced her into a marriage during a family vacation in Jordan, in a divorce action against her construction worker husband, who raped and beat her until her mother engineered her escape. Back in the United States, the young woman was beaten by her older brother, who was furious that she had defied her father’s wishes. Actual or potential victims may need protection from the criminal justice system to prevent family members from coercing them into marriages or retaliating against them when they refuse to accede to their wishes. Protection is also available in family court, where victims can initiate family offense proceedings to obtain civil protective orders against coercive relatives and child welfare authorities can initiate neglect and abuse proceedings. Lawyers representing immigrants have encountered cases in which parents are pressuring or forcing their daughter, who holds permanent resident status or citizenship, to sponsor a fiancé or husband from her home country. Assisting families to carry out such plans is highly unethical. Alerting immigration authorities to the young woman’s plight, while stressing the importance of
- Page 341 and 342: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 343 and 344: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 345 and 346: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 347 and 348: Asylum and Related Remedies Represe
- Page 349 and 350: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 351 and 352: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 353 and 354: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 355 and 356: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 357 and 358: ASISTA http://www.asistaonline.org
- Page 359 and 360: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 361 and 362: Notes Representing Immigrant Victim
- Page 363 and 364: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 365 and 366: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 367 and 368: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 369 and 370: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 371 and 372: Representing Immigrant Victims of D
- Page 373 and 374: Helping Immigrant Victims of Domest
- Page 375 and 376: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 377 and 378: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 379 and 380: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 381 and 382: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 383 and 384: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 385: Helping Immigrant Victims Access Fe
- Page 388 and 389: 370 Dorchen A. Leidholdt Traffickin
- Page 390 and 391: 372 Dorchen A. Leidholdt Before you
- Page 394 and 395: 376 Dorchen A. Leidholdt keeping he
- Page 396 and 397: 378 Dorchen A. Leidholdt FGM is roo
- Page 398 and 399: 380 Dorchen A. Leidholdt Notes 1. T
- Page 400 and 401: 382 Dorchen A. Leidholdt 17. See In
- Page 403 and 404: 22 Advocating for Youth in Domestic
- Page 405 and 406: Distrust of Authority Advocating fo
- Page 407 and 408: Advocating for Youth in Domestic Vi
- Page 409 and 410: Advocating for Youth in Domestic Vi
- Page 411 and 412: Advocating for Youth in Domestic Vi
- Page 413 and 414: Advocating for Youth in Domestic Vi
- Page 415 and 416: Advocating for Youth in Domestic Vi
- Page 417 and 418: Notes Advocating for Youth in Domes
- Page 419 and 420: 23 Domestic Violence in the Lesbian
- Page 421 and 422: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 423 and 424: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 425 and 426: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 427 and 428: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 429 and 430: Notes Domestic Violence in the LGBT
- Page 431 and 432: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 433 and 434: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 435 and 436: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 437: Domestic Violence in the LGBT Commu
- Page 441 and 442: Appendices Power and Control Wheel
374 Dorchen A. Leidholdt<br />
such as swinging and anal sex, that their previous female partners had refused.<br />
When the internet brides also refused, they were raped; when they fled, the men<br />
pursued new “brides” over the internet.<br />
When internet marriages turn violent, victims need the same kinds of<br />
protection as other battered women. Explore with your client the possibility of<br />
calling the police to initiate a criminal prosecution and obtain a criminal order<br />
of protection. Also discuss with her the advantages and disadvantages of filing<br />
for a civil order of protection in family court or as part of the interim relief in a<br />
matrimonial action.<br />
Like women and girls who have been prostituted, victims of the internet<br />
bride trade are often subjected to misogynistic stereotypes. The popular media<br />
and commercial movies have portrayed the internet bride as a gold-digging<br />
“Natasha,” in pursuit of a green card, who preys on vulnerable, lovelorn<br />
American men. Interviews with victims represented by Sanctuary for Famlies<br />
reveal that the women, several of whom came with their children, genuinely<br />
hoped for warm, loving, and supportive husbands with whom they could build<br />
families. Their new husbands, by contrast, were often sex industry consumers;<br />
several were substance abusers or mentally ill. Often the men portrayed a falsely<br />
wholesome and affluent picture of their lives in the United States that induced<br />
their victims to give up apartments and jobs in their home countries. Soon after<br />
they arrived, the women were confronted with a depressing and violent reality<br />
— along with threats that unless they complied with all of their husband-to-be’s<br />
demands they would be forever undocumented and subject to deportation.<br />
You should be prepared to confront the derogatory stereotypes of internet<br />
brides and educate the court and any other key players in your case about the<br />
reality of your client’s situation. Unless challenged, these stereotypes will undercut<br />
your client’s credibility and increase the difficulty of persuading authorities to<br />
pursue appropriate action, such as prosecuting her American husband for marital<br />
rape or granting her immigration protection.<br />
Even when their husbands refuse to serve as their immigration sponsors,<br />
internet brides are likely to be eligible for immigration law relief. Women who<br />
can establish that they married their American husbands in good faith and were<br />
subjected to battering or extreme cruelty are usually eligible either to apply for<br />
battered spouse waivers or to self-petition under the Violence Against Women<br />
Act. Internet brides subjected by their husbands to forced labor or sexual<br />
exploitation through fraud, force, or coercion may be able to establish the<br />
requirements of “severe trafficking” under the Trafficking Victims Protection<br />
Act. If they are willing to cooperate with the investigation and prosecution of a