24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Matrimonial Actions 233<br />

Finally, only an order of protection requested pursuant to Domestic<br />

Relations Law § 252 can require that the party who is the object of the order<br />

pay reasonable counsel fees and disbursements incurred by a person protected<br />

by the order to obtain or enforce it. While this provision can be invoked by<br />

either the Family <strong>Court</strong> or the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> if a matrimonial action is<br />

pending, a Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justice will probably give a more generous award<br />

than a Family <strong>Court</strong> judge. In the same way that Family <strong>Court</strong> judges might be<br />

more liberal about issuing temporary orders of protection because they are more<br />

accustomed to them, a Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justice is likely to award more generous<br />

fees because counsel fee applications are more routine in that forum.<br />

<strong>Court</strong> Conferences and Referrals<br />

Parties in contested matrimonial actions are required to appear in court for<br />

preliminary conferences, compliance conferences, and pre-trial conferences.<br />

These conferences are often conducted outside of the formal courtroom in<br />

smaller rooms. This means that a victim of domestic violence may well be put<br />

in the position of sitting in very close proximity to her batterer. However,<br />

Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justices are becoming more sensitive to issues of domestic<br />

violence and may be amenable to an attorney’s request to waive the requirement<br />

of a victim’s presence during all conferences or, at a minimum, agree to conduct<br />

the conference in the courtroom with court officers present.<br />

When custody and visitation are disputed issues, the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> is relying<br />

more and more on court-employed social workers who meet simultaneously with<br />

both parties, court-sponsored parental education programs, parenting plans and<br />

mediation to assist in the resolution of these conflicts. Attorneys representing<br />

victims of domestic violence in custody and visitation disputes in Supreme<br />

<strong>Court</strong> should, with their client’s permission, promptly inform the court that their<br />

client is a victim of domestic violence. The court system acknowledges that<br />

mediation, parental education programs, parenting plans and meetings between<br />

both parties and a social worker are generally inappropriate and potentially<br />

dangerous where domestic violence has been present. The Office of the<br />

Statewide Administrative Judge for Matrimonial Matters provides regular<br />

training for matrimonial Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justices, which counsels judges not to<br />

make referrals to such programs when the existence of domestic violence is<br />

brought to their attention.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!