Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

24.03.2013 Views

216 Elizabeth Cronin Medical Experts In the prosecution of an assault, the prosecutor must prove physical injury, 63 which means either impairment of physical condition or substantial pain. 64 Even without a victim to testify, a prosecutor may be able to prove the element of injury through photographs, the medical records of the victim and an expert to describe the injuries and give an opinion about what the injuries signify. A physician can also read the victim’s description of the cause of the injuries from the medical report if it is established that the history is relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of her injuries. 65 A medical expert can be called to testify, for example, about bite marks on the victim66 or to give an opinion that a hair found in the victim’s teeth was consistent with the defendant’s hair. 67 Some courts have allowed the introduction of medical records, including the history, under CPLR § 4518(a), which allows business records to be entered into evidence as proof of an act, transaction, occurrence or event. The hospital record can be important corroboration of the victim’s testimony that she had to seek medical treatment. The medical witness can testify as to what the victim stated at the hospital as long as the statements were relevant to the treatment of the victim. In People v Swinger, a New York City Criminal Court found that statements made by a domestic violence victim to an emergency room physician were admissible as a business record. 68 The business record exception to the hearsay rule applies to criminal cases. 69 Unredacted hospital records that indicate, for example, that the victim was “hit in the face,” may also be admitted, provided the statement was germane to the medical diagnosis and treatment. 70 Criminal Contempt and Other Creative Charges When a victim refuses to cooperate, prosecutors may need to be creative in considering what charges to bring. Many victims of domestic violence obtain orders of protection either through the Family or Criminal Courts. Violations of these orders constitute separate crimes. The police may be able to arrest the batterer for violating the order of protection even if the victim refuses to cooperate. Witnesses who see the offender where he is not permitted to be or who overhear when he calls the victim’s job, for example, can be called to testify. Other crimes that may be considered are stalking, tampering with a witness, 71 resisting arrest, 72 obstructing governmental administration, 73 criminal possession of a weapon, 74 criminal trespass 75 or criminal mischief. 76

Beyond Victims’ Testimony 217 Because of what we know about the dynamics of battering, the safety of the victim must be paramount. Prosecutors must carefully weigh proceeding with a prosecution against the often very real fear by the victim that such action will endanger her or her children. Victims may be at their most vulnerable when they leave an abusive situation or relationship and that must be taken into consideration by law enforcement. The victim may want assistance in considering all of her options including seeking help in Family Court rather than Criminal Court, obtaining an order of protection without formal criminal charges, and getting the offender help. Ultimately, a prosecutor must decide whether the State’s interest in punishing domestic violence outweighs her reluctance. She recovered from her devastating head injuries, but as time passed, she became less cooperative with the prosecutor. By the time of trial, she was becoming more hostile to the prosecutor. When called to testify, she tried to protect him and claimed it was self-defense. The prosecutor had to have her declared a hostile witness and cross examine her with prior inconsistent statements. The prosecutor was able to use the defendant’s statements to police that she had attacked him, her excited utterance to police when they found her near death, medical testimony and expert testimony regarding battered woman syndrome. He was convicted of attempted murder in the second degree and remains incarcerated.

Beyond Victims’ Testimony 217<br />

Because of what we know about the dynamics of battering, the safety of the<br />

victim must be paramount. Prosecutors must carefully weigh proceeding with a<br />

prosecution against the often very real fear by the victim that such action will<br />

endanger her or her children. Victims may be at their most vulnerable when they<br />

leave an abusive situation or relationship and that must be taken into consideration<br />

by law enforcement. The victim may want assistance in considering all of her<br />

options including seeking help in Family <strong>Court</strong> rather than Criminal <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

obtaining an order of protection without formal criminal charges, and getting the<br />

offender help. Ultimately, a prosecutor must decide whether the State’s interest in<br />

punishing domestic violence outweighs her reluctance.<br />

She recovered from her devastating head injuries, but as time<br />

passed, she became less cooperative with the prosecutor. By the<br />

time of trial, she was becoming more hostile to the prosecutor.<br />

When called to testify, she tried to protect him and claimed it was<br />

self-defense. The prosecutor had to have her declared a hostile<br />

witness and cross examine her with prior inconsistent statements.<br />

The prosecutor was able to use the defendant’s statements to<br />

police that she had attacked him, her excited utterance to police<br />

when they found her near death, medical testimony and expert<br />

testimony regarding battered woman syndrome. He was convicted<br />

of attempted murder in the second degree and remains<br />

incarcerated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!