Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

24.03.2013 Views

188 Jill Laurie Goodman affection or guilt, and, while she may want to stop the abuse, she still may seek to avoid causing her abuser harm. She, like other domestic violence victims, may be economically dependent on her abuser and therefore loathe to see him incarcerated. She may simply be terrified by his threats to harm her if she participates in the case against him. The prosecution may move forward while she is trying to rebuild her life, looking for a job and housing, or still recovering from psychic and physical trauma. Even more than other rape victims, a victim of intimate partner rape faces questions about her credibility, and, like other victims of non-stranger rapes, these questions may go directly to her character. She may find that friends and family share societal prejudices against women who are victims of rape. The closer and more intimate the victim and defendant, the greater the victim’s reluctance to proceed with the prosecution may be, and if the victim and perpetrator are married, the difficulties may be great indeed. As a prosecutor, you can try to overcome a victim’s reluctance by providing support. You can listen to her, make clear you believe her, and let her know that you understand the courage it takes to go forward with this kind of case. You should make sure she has access to resources in her community, both domestic violence agencies and rape crisis centers. Consulting with her about strategy, among other things, confirms your commitment to her. You should also tell the victim why you think this prosecution is important. If you believe the defendant is a serious threat to the community and should be in prison to protect the public from his violence, you can explain that her participation is important not just for herself but for others. If her own safety is a major issue and you think other charges against him, for example, assault or burglary, will not result in the kind of sentence that will keep him from harming her again, you should let her know your concerns. If you see a pattern of attacks increasing in frequency and severity that make you fear for her life, you should tell her. Credibility Like civil practitioners, you will have to confront sharp attacks on the victim’s credibility. Stranger rape prosecutions are likely to hinge on questions of identification, and the victim will probably be portrayed as mistaken, rather than lying, and the attacks on her may be muted. Intimate partner sexual rape cases are likely to pit the victim’s word against the perpetrator’s, so demolishing the victim’s character commonly is the defense strategy of choice. As prosecutor, you should look for supporting and corroborating evidence that will enhance the victim’s credibility. You may be fortunate enough to have

When Domestic Violence Victims Are Sexually Assaulted 189 physical evidence, such as torn or bloody clothing. You may be able to locate family or neighbors who heard screams or saw her soon after the attack. The victim may immediately have told someone she was raped so that her statement is admissible as “outcry” evidence, an ancient exception to the hearsay rule. You should also seek out evidence, such as telephone or credit card records, that may corroborate her word on collateral issues and establish her as a credible witness so that her testimony on uncorroborated points also will be believed. Ultimately, situating the sexual assault in the context of a pattern of abuse may be the best approach to making the victim’s account believable. Just as information about the sexual assault may be necessary to complete and make credible the narrative of the victim’s abuse, so the non-sexual abuse may be essential to understanding the rape. How her abuser managed to evoke terror sufficient to accomplish the rape may not be obvious otherwise. Once abusers have established their dominance by violence, they may need little to evoke the fear that will make their victims comply with their demands. Threats that were once overt become oblique and, to outsiders, obscure. If the abuser’s birthday was the occasion of a particularly brutal attack, he may produce fear just by telling her to remember June 16th. If he excuses his violence by saying that his victim made him angry, all he may need to do is say, “You don’t want to make me mad” to have her do as he demands. The threat need not be verbal. Walking into her apartment, dead-bolting the door, and unplugging the phone may be enough to terrify her. If he has hurt her badly in the course of raping her in the past, she may know that if he wants sex the surest way to avoid injury is to offer no resistance. As a prosecutor you are free to introduce evidence that puts apparently harmless gestures and actions into a context in which they can be seen as forcible compulsion. New York courts have carved out exceptions to the general rule against admitting evidence of previous violent acts that provide prosecutors with considerable latitude. According to a line of New York cases reaching back at least a hundred years, evidence of other bad acts is admissible as long as the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effects. 29 As one court said recently, uncharged crimes or bad acts may be admitted whenever they are “inextricably interwoven with the charged crimes, provide necessary background or complete a witness’s narrative.” 30 Testimony describing the defendant’s physical abuse of his wife has been permitted in murder cases31 and evidence of physical abuse of a third party — the mother of a victim of sodomy — has been allowed to show the fear that constituted forcible compulsion in a rape case. 32 In one recent case suggesting the leeway prosecutors may have to present a

188 Jill Laurie Goodman<br />

affection or guilt, and, while she may want to stop the abuse, she still may seek<br />

to avoid causing her abuser harm. She, like other domestic violence victims,<br />

may be economically dependent on her abuser and therefore loathe to see him<br />

incarcerated. She may simply be terrified by his threats to harm her if she<br />

participates in the case against him. The prosecution may move forward while<br />

she is trying to rebuild her life, looking for a job and housing, or still recovering<br />

from psychic and physical trauma. Even more than other rape victims, a victim<br />

of intimate partner rape faces questions about her credibility, and, like other<br />

victims of non-stranger rapes, these questions may go directly to her character.<br />

She may find that friends and family share societal prejudices against women<br />

who are victims of rape. The closer and more intimate the victim and defendant,<br />

the greater the victim’s reluctance to proceed with the prosecution may be, and<br />

if the victim and perpetrator are married, the difficulties may be great indeed.<br />

As a prosecutor, you can try to overcome a victim’s reluctance by providing<br />

support. You can listen to her, make clear you believe her, and let her know that<br />

you understand the courage it takes to go forward with this kind of case. You<br />

should make sure she has access to resources in her community, both domestic<br />

violence agencies and rape crisis centers. Consulting with her about strategy,<br />

among other things, confirms your commitment to her.<br />

You should also tell the victim why you think this prosecution is important.<br />

If you believe the defendant is a serious threat to the community and should be<br />

in prison to protect the public from his violence, you can explain that her<br />

participation is important not just for herself but for others. If her own safety is<br />

a major issue and you think other charges against him, for example, assault or<br />

burglary, will not result in the kind of sentence that will keep him from harming<br />

her again, you should let her know your concerns. If you see a pattern of attacks<br />

increasing in frequency and severity that make you fear for her life, you should<br />

tell her.<br />

Credibility<br />

Like civil practitioners, you will have to confront sharp attacks on the<br />

victim’s credibility. Stranger rape prosecutions are likely to hinge on questions<br />

of identification, and the victim will probably be portrayed as mistaken, rather<br />

than lying, and the attacks on her may be muted. Intimate partner sexual rape<br />

cases are likely to pit the victim’s word against the perpetrator’s, so demolishing<br />

the victim’s character commonly is the defense strategy of choice.<br />

As prosecutor, you should look for supporting and corroborating evidence<br />

that will enhance the victim’s credibility. You may be fortunate enough to have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!