Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

178 Lisa Fischel-Wolovick
Notes
1. Laws of 1994, ch 222.
2. See Criminal Procedure Law § 140.10.
3. Linda Mills, Commentary: Killing Her Softly: Intimate Abuse and the
Violence of State Intervention, 113 Harv L Rev 550, 555 (1999).
4. Id. at 556.
5. Family Court Act § 813 (c).
6. Bruno v Codd, 47 NY2d 582 (1979).
7. Id. at 589; see also Thurman v City of Torrington, 595 F Supp 1521 (1984).
8. New York State Office of Domestic Violence Prevention, Evaluation of
DVIA Mandatory Arrest Provisions: Final Report,
http://www.opdv.state.ny.us/criminal_justice/police/finalreport/evaluation.html
(2001).
9. Id. at 13.
10. Id. at 24.
11. Id. at 24.
12. Id. at 24.
13. Laws of 2003, ch 303.
14. Laws of 2003, ch 222 (Legislative Memoranda).
15. Daniel G. Saunders, The Tendency to Arrest Victims of Domestic Violence:
A Preliminary Analysis of Officer Characteristics, 10 J of Interpersonal
Violence, at 147, 148 (June 1995).
16. Steven D. Epstein, The Problem of Dual Arrest in Family Violence Cases,
Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence, October 21, 1987, at 1.
17. Criminal Procedure Law § 140.10(c).
18. McKinney’s Session Laws 2001.
19. D.A. Ford, The Impact of Police Officers’ Attitudes Towards Victims on the
Disinclination to Arrest Wife Batterers, Paper presented at the Third National
Conference for Family Violence Researchers, University of New Hampshire,
Durham, New Hampshire. See also Daniel G. Saunders, The Tendency to
Arrest Victims of Domestic Violence: A Preliminary Analysis of Officer
Characteristics, 10 J of Interpersonal Violence, at 147, 148 (June 1995).