24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and Abused Mothers 133<br />

How Does a Party Bring a Hague Convention Claim?<br />

A parent seeking the return of an abducted child may make an application<br />

directly to a court in the Contracting State to which the child has been taken. The<br />

parent may also submit an application to the Central Authority in his or her own<br />

country, which then forwards the application to the Central Authority in the<br />

abducted-to country. These options are not mutually exclusive, so a party seeking<br />

return of a child under the Hague Convention may use both avenues of relief.<br />

What are the Elements of a Hague Convention Claim?<br />

Wrongful Removal<br />

To make out a prima facie case under the Hague Convention in the<br />

United States, the parent seeking return of the child must first establish, by a<br />

preponderance of the evidence, that there was a “wrongful removal.” A<br />

wrongful removal occurs if the child was taken from his or her habitual<br />

residence in breach of the other parent’s custodial rights that were being<br />

exercised at the time of removal.<br />

Habitual Residence<br />

The Hague Convention does not define what constitutes “habitual<br />

residence,” and courts have developed this concept through caselaw. Habitual<br />

residence, unlike domicile, does not necessarily depend on the long-term<br />

intentions of the parties but is a concept used to identify where the children and<br />

family are settled. As one court stated, habitual residence depends on “a ‘degree<br />

of settled purpose,’ as evidenced by the child’s circumstances in that place and<br />

the shared intentions of the parents regarding their child’s presence there. The<br />

focus is on the child rather than the parents.” 6 Another court, explaining the<br />

concept of habitual residence, stated that “technically, habitual residence can be<br />

established after only one day as long as there is some evidence that the child<br />

has become ‘settled’ into the location in question.” 7<br />

Rights of Custody<br />

Wrongful removal occurs only if the child was taken from his or her<br />

habitual residence in breach of the other parent’s custodial rights, which were<br />

being exercised at the time of removal. The Hague Convention defines rights<br />

of custody as “rights relating to the care of the person of the child and, in<br />

particular, the right to determine the child’s place of residence.” 8 This term was<br />

intended by the Convention drafters to be interpreted broadly. For more<br />

specificity on what constitutes custody rights, it is important to look to the laws<br />

of the child’s country of habitual residence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!