Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

24.03.2013 Views

114 Liberty Aldrich and Lauren Shapiro clients who want to leave New York. In particular, you need to know whether the parties are married or whether paternity has been established to help decide whether or not to file a custody case in New York immediately or whether you should wait. An Existing Custody Order From Another State The first issue is whether a custody order is already in place from the original state, the terms of such order, and whether the order was on consent, after trial, or on default. A New York court may not modify an existing out-ofstate custody order unless the court that rendered the decree declines to assume jurisdiction and New York has a significant connection to the case. 68 However, even if New York does not have jurisdiction (or while a determination is being made regarding jurisdiction) and there is a custody or visitation order from another state, New York can assert temporary emergency jurisdiction if necessary to protect the parent. 69 In Hector G. v Josefina P., 70 the Court “assume[d] temporary emergency in order to investigate further the domestic violence allegations.” After asserting temporary jurisdiction, the court found that it had jurisdiction to modify the final custody order because the original court declined jurisdiction and the children and the mother had “significant connections” with New York. Specifically, the court noted that the children had lived in New York for a year, went to school here, and had a pediatrician here. In addition, a report had already been completed by the Administration for Children’s Service, the local child protective agency. The court decided to exercise jurisdiction since New York was the more convenient forum. Any court may punish a party who willfully violates an existing court order, and most courts will punish a parent who removes a child from the jurisdiction when the parent was specifically prohibited from doing so. Courts can also hold a party in contempt for failing to respond to other orders of the court, such as a subpoena, an order to appear in another state’s court, or an order to produce the child. If the court finds after a hearing that your client willfully violated the order, she may be held in contempt of court. In more extreme situations, your client may face criminal sanctions for custodial interference. You must argue that she fled for her safety and not to relitigate an unfavorable custody or visitation decision. Fleeing an incident or pattern of domestic violence is an affirmative defense to international kidnapping; 71 you should argue that while this defense was enacted for international crimes, it is federal law and the rationale behind the defense should be applied to interstate crimes as well.

Moving On: UCCJEA, The Hague Convention, and Relocation 115 No Court Order When no prior court order exists, the non-custodial parent has parental rights to the child, and your client has fled to New York, she has several different options. Should she file a custody proceeding? The first strategic issue facing your client is whether to file a custody case in New York. In some instances, initiating a proceeding may not be in your client’s best interest. While a domestic violence victim may be able to keep her residence confidential, the court papers will necessarily reveal the state in which your client is located. Also, in order for any court case to proceed, your client will be required to serve the other party, which can be difficult in another state. (You can contact the sheriff or marshal in the county where the other parent lives.) Sometimes a parent who in the past has expressed no interest in the children, in the face of being served with court papers, may show a new or renewed interest in the children. He may file for custody in the state your client fled, forcing her to return to litigate the case there. Therefore, it may be a better option to wait to file a petition for the requisite six months and allow New York to become the home state. While filing for an emergency temporary order of custody may give your client the security of having a custody order in hand, even if only temporarily, it is unlikely that the final custody order will be decided in New York and you must therefore be prepared to have the case litigated in her original jurisdiction. If you do decide to go to court immediately for a temporary order, you will need to prove the existence of the domestic violence and show its harmful effect on the children. From the outset you should assess the seriousness of the abuse, its duration, and the evidence of the abuse you can introduce in court. Discuss with your client whether she already has any police reports, medical records, photos, witnesses, or orders of protection. She may want to file a police report in New York as soon as possible. You should obtain certified copies of any orders from the other state. If the parent who was left behind files for custody in the home state, you should try to find an attorney in that state to represent your client. Once the proceeding is filed in that state your client should file a custody proceeding in New York. You should suggest that the other attorney argue that the court decline jurisdiction on the grounds that the forum is inconvenient. If there are two proceedings pending, the courts should communicate and decide which court should hear the case, but again, it is likely that the ultimate custody decision will be made by the home state.

114 Liberty Aldrich and Lauren Shapiro<br />

clients who want to leave New York. In particular, you need to know whether<br />

the parties are married or whether paternity has been established to help decide<br />

whether or not to file a custody case in New York immediately or whether you<br />

should wait.<br />

An Existing Custody Order From Another State<br />

The first issue is whether a custody order is already in place from the<br />

original state, the terms of such order, and whether the order was on consent,<br />

after trial, or on default. A New York court may not modify an existing out-ofstate<br />

custody order unless the court that rendered the decree declines to assume<br />

jurisdiction and New York has a significant connection to the case. 68 However,<br />

even if New York does not have jurisdiction (or while a determination is being<br />

made regarding jurisdiction) and there is a custody or visitation order from<br />

another state, New York can assert temporary emergency jurisdiction if<br />

necessary to protect the parent. 69 In Hector G. v Josefina P., 70 the <strong>Court</strong><br />

“assume[d] temporary emergency in order to investigate further the domestic<br />

violence allegations.” After asserting temporary jurisdiction, the court found that<br />

it had jurisdiction to modify the final custody order because the original court<br />

declined jurisdiction and the children and the mother had “significant<br />

connections” with New York. Specifically, the court noted that the children had<br />

lived in New York for a year, went to school here, and had a pediatrician here.<br />

In addition, a report had already been completed by the Administration for<br />

Children’s Service, the local child protective agency. The court decided to<br />

exercise jurisdiction since New York was the more convenient forum.<br />

Any court may punish a party who willfully violates an existing court order,<br />

and most courts will punish a parent who removes a child from the jurisdiction<br />

when the parent was specifically prohibited from doing so. <strong>Court</strong>s can also hold<br />

a party in contempt for failing to respond to other orders of the court, such as a<br />

subpoena, an order to appear in another state’s court, or an order to produce the<br />

child. If the court finds after a hearing that your client willfully violated the<br />

order, she may be held in contempt of court. In more extreme situations, your<br />

client may face criminal sanctions for custodial interference. You must argue<br />

that she fled for her safety and not to relitigate an unfavorable custody or<br />

visitation decision. Fleeing an incident or pattern of domestic violence is an<br />

affirmative defense to international kidnapping; 71 you should argue that while<br />

this defense was enacted for international crimes, it is federal law and the<br />

rationale behind the defense should be applied to interstate crimes as well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!