Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ... Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
women during pregnancy and then again after delivery. Such an approach gives the women a chance to give their views before delivery and then to determine how the experience of labour and delivery may possibly have affected their views. Two studies collected data after delivery (Cunningham 1993; Davies, Hey, Reid et al 1996). Results in retrospective studies could be marred by what actually happens during the process of labour and delivery. For example, when women are asked about their preferences for home or hospital birth following delivery, their responses might be indicative of their experiences during the process rather than what initially motivated their choice. One study included women who were intending to be pregnant in the next ten years (Mather 1980). Women who are not yet pregnant may have different views about childbirth, which might change when they are actually faced with the situation of pregnancy and the prospect of giving birth. Data collection for most studies was conducted during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. This is an appropriate time as the pregnancy is more likely to be stable. Women are also likely at the second and last trimester to be considering where they might want to give birth. Discussion The aim of the systematic review was to identify studies about women's views regarding the place of birth, in terms of how much work has been done, and to identify gaps, if any, in the literature. The theoretical framework derives from risk perception (Douglas and Wildavslcy 1982; Johnson and Covello 1987; Kahneman and Tversky 1984; Schwing and Albers 1980) and considered that women's views of risk and safety related to the process of childbirth might have a 67
ole to play in their preferences for home or hospital birth. NHS latest policy on childbirth was also considered, which calls for women to be given more information to allow them to make informed decisions about their care, including where they want to give birth (Department of Health 1993b) The questions to ask, therefore, in the light of the review, are, firstly, whether there is evidence for risk perception as having an impact on the choice of place of birth. Secondly, did the review provide evidence about whether women are aware of options available to them about the place of birth? The review did not find answers for either question. The reason for this is that, regarding the first question, there is a dearth of studies looking at expectant women's views about why they choose to deliver where they do. Secondly, and most significant, is a lack of exploratory studies to determine the women's views. The few available studies used questionnaires, with specific questions that the researchers wanted to investigate about decision-making regarding the place of birth. The method of data collection used in the studies did not allow for spontaneous responses that might give an indication of women's perceptions of risk related to childbirth. However, eight out of the nine studies included in the review indicated that women planning a hospital birth were concerned about safety. Secondly, previous experience with a facility influenced where the woman planned to have her baby. For example, some who had previous complications chose hospital in case there was a repeat of the last experience while those who had a good experience of home chose home again. The fear of complications and resultant choice of hospital birth, and the choice of place of birth according to previous experience could be seen to be an expression of perception of risk, resulting in the choice of place perceived to be better equipped to deal with potential problems. As regards the second question, the studies did not give an indication of whether 68
- Page 17 and 18: home. They also put forward the fac
- Page 19 and 20: equirements for the maximum lowerin
- Page 21 and 22: Previous committees had made their
- Page 23 and 24: The majority of those interviewed f
- Page 25 and 26: The Expert Maternity Group gathered
- Page 27 and 28: • The woman and, if she wishes, h
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Risk perception Chapter
- Page 31 and 32: From the health practitioner's pers
- Page 33 and 34: 1979), is a second approach to unde
- Page 35 and 36: normative factor. The individual's
- Page 37 and 38: and then choose the place they cons
- Page 39 and 40: example, they worried that the valu
- Page 41 and 42: they can easily imagine or recall a
- Page 43 and 44: are not necessarily chosen because
- Page 45 and 46: make decisions that are not necessa
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: Systematic review of fac
- Page 49 and 50: considered. Primary research design
- Page 51 and 52: If the question of the review is no
- Page 53 and 54: Cochrane Database of Systematic rev
- Page 55 and 56: Table 2: Search terms used Search t
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3: Journals that were hand se
- Page 59 and 60: solely on the basis of the study re
- Page 61 and 62: they were recruited, at what stage
- Page 63 and 64: ,,, ... .g eD .E 0 o 4,7; (.5 g .5
- Page 65 and 66: -o -cs •b a) ..o ,:" .., -0 ti-,
- Page 67: Quality of studies included in the
- Page 71 and 72: The next chapter discusses methodol
- Page 73 and 74: observable behaviour are used (Holl
- Page 75 and 76: known? What roles do values play in
- Page 77 and 78: male nursing home is used (Applegat
- Page 79 and 80: The procedure ensures a vigorous se
- Page 81 and 82: investigation have for the particip
- Page 83 and 84: In method triangulation, different
- Page 85 and 86: the context being studied. They fur
- Page 87 and 88: access to all settings, and the dat
- Page 89 and 90: access participants' private accoun
- Page 91 and 92: There is an argument for analysing
- Page 93 and 94: analysis, asking additional questio
- Page 95 and 96: that while such an approach can nev
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5: Qualitative Study of Wom
- Page 99 and 100: potential participants, as well as
- Page 101 and 102: either. Three months passed, there
- Page 103 and 104: The interview was transcribed the s
- Page 105 and 106: elevant. The environment of the hom
- Page 107 and 108: wanted to explore. Consequently, th
- Page 109 and 110: Most women offered coffee or tea, a
- Page 111 and 112: All women who participated in the s
- Page 113 and 114: The process of analysis was iterati
- Page 115 and 116: h4,u husbovzi would sou thnt lie fe
- Page 117 and 118: transcripts and compared them with
women during pregnancy and then again after delivery. Such an approach gives<br />
the women a chance to give their views before delivery and then to determine how<br />
the experience of labour and delivery may possibly have affected their views.<br />
Two studies collected data after delivery (Cunningham 1993; Davies, Hey,<br />
Reid et al 1996). Results in retrospective studies could be marred by what<br />
actually happens during the process of labour and delivery. For example, when<br />
women are asked about their preferences for home or hospital birth following<br />
delivery, their responses might be indicative of their experiences during the<br />
process rather than what initially motivated their choice.<br />
One study included women who were intending to be pregnant in the next<br />
ten years (Mather 1980). Women who are not yet pregnant may have different<br />
views about childbirth, which might change when they are actually faced with the<br />
situation of pregnancy and the prospect of giving birth.<br />
Data collection for most studies was conducted during the second or third<br />
trimester of pregnancy. This is an appropriate time as the pregnancy is more<br />
likely to be stable. Women are also likely at the second and last trimester to be<br />
considering where they might want to give birth.<br />
Discussion<br />
The aim of the systematic review was to identify studies about women's<br />
views regarding the place of birth, in terms of how much work has been done, and<br />
to identify gaps, if any, in the literature. The theoretical framework derives from<br />
risk perception (Douglas and Wildavslcy 1982; Johnson and Covello 1987;<br />
Kahneman and Tversky 1984; Schwing and Albers 1980) and considered that<br />
women's views of risk and safety related to the process of childbirth might have a<br />
67