Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ... Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
The 10 key words used in the search identified 25,345 studies. The search term childbirth was then eliminated as it was too wide, reducing the number of hits to 3,329. The 3,329 studies were stored in the systematic review database, and all duplicate references identified and transferred to the duplicate database, leaving 477 studies in the main database. All studies that did not relate to childbirth were transferred to the irrelevant database, leaving 150 studies in the pool. The title and abstract of each was read, and if it did not address the issue of choice of place of delivery was considered irrelevant and sent to the irrelevant database, leaving 25 studies for the final review process. Whole documents of the 25 papers were retrieved, and the studies read in detail applying the inclusion criteria, which specified that studies had to address women's views on factors affecting their choice of place of birth. Nine studies failed to meet the inclusion criteria and were removed, leaving 16 that reported about women's views about the place of birth. Of the 16 studies, only 9 had aimed to ask women about their reasons for choosing their place of delivery. The other 7 studies reported women's views although they did not set out to determine reasons for choosing the place of birth (Bastian 1993; McClain 1983; McClain 1987; Morison, Percival, Hauk et al 1999; Ogden, Shaw, and Zander 1997; Townsend-Fullerton 1982; Waldenstrom and Nilsson 1993). The 7 studies were therefore eliminated from the review. The 9 remaining studies that met the inclusion criteria, and specifically reviewed reasons for choosing a place of delivery are summarised in Table 4. Information abstracted from the studies and included in Table 4 comprises the study, and where it was conducted, to determine the coverage of studies in different countries. It also includes the study sample, i.e., who is included, how 59
they were recruited, at what stage of pregnancy, the size of the sample and whether they were followed up. The study sample information was used to determine whether like was being compared with like, and the possible influence of the situation of the sample on the results. Further information included in the tables covers key characteristics of the study (for instance, the data collection tool, and the nature of the question about the place of birth), and, outcome measures. For the purpose of the study, outcome measures are the main reasons given by women in favour of a home or hospital birth. Summary information about the studies is presented in Table 4 which follows: 60
- Page 9 and 10: Kingdom is a pluralistic society, w
- Page 11 and 12: hospital delivery following a revie
- Page 13 and 14: The committee issued a press notice
- Page 15 and 16: The recommendations of the report u
- Page 17 and 18: home. They also put forward the fac
- Page 19 and 20: equirements for the maximum lowerin
- Page 21 and 22: Previous committees had made their
- Page 23 and 24: The majority of those interviewed f
- Page 25 and 26: The Expert Maternity Group gathered
- Page 27 and 28: • The woman and, if she wishes, h
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Risk perception Chapter
- Page 31 and 32: From the health practitioner's pers
- Page 33 and 34: 1979), is a second approach to unde
- Page 35 and 36: normative factor. The individual's
- Page 37 and 38: and then choose the place they cons
- Page 39 and 40: example, they worried that the valu
- Page 41 and 42: they can easily imagine or recall a
- Page 43 and 44: are not necessarily chosen because
- Page 45 and 46: make decisions that are not necessa
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: Systematic review of fac
- Page 49 and 50: considered. Primary research design
- Page 51 and 52: If the question of the review is no
- Page 53 and 54: Cochrane Database of Systematic rev
- Page 55 and 56: Table 2: Search terms used Search t
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3: Journals that were hand se
- Page 59: solely on the basis of the study re
- Page 63 and 64: ,,, ... .g eD .E 0 o 4,7; (.5 g .5
- Page 65 and 66: -o -cs •b a) ..o ,:" .., -0 ti-,
- Page 67 and 68: Quality of studies included in the
- Page 69 and 70: ole to play in their preferences fo
- Page 71 and 72: The next chapter discusses methodol
- Page 73 and 74: observable behaviour are used (Holl
- Page 75 and 76: known? What roles do values play in
- Page 77 and 78: male nursing home is used (Applegat
- Page 79 and 80: The procedure ensures a vigorous se
- Page 81 and 82: investigation have for the particip
- Page 83 and 84: In method triangulation, different
- Page 85 and 86: the context being studied. They fur
- Page 87 and 88: access to all settings, and the dat
- Page 89 and 90: access participants' private accoun
- Page 91 and 92: There is an argument for analysing
- Page 93 and 94: analysis, asking additional questio
- Page 95 and 96: that while such an approach can nev
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5: Qualitative Study of Wom
- Page 99 and 100: potential participants, as well as
- Page 101 and 102: either. Three months passed, there
- Page 103 and 104: The interview was transcribed the s
- Page 105 and 106: elevant. The environment of the hom
- Page 107 and 108: wanted to explore. Consequently, th
- Page 109 and 110: Most women offered coffee or tea, a
they were recruited, at what stage of pregnancy, the size of the sample and<br />
whether they were followed up. The study sample information was used to<br />
determine whether like was being compared with like, and the possible influence<br />
of the situation of the sample on the results. Further information included in the<br />
tables covers key characteristics of the study (for instance, the data collection tool,<br />
and the nature of the question about the place of birth), and, outcome measures.<br />
For the purpose of the study, outcome measures are the main reasons given by<br />
women in favour of a home or hospital birth. Summary information about the<br />
studies is presented in Table 4 which follows:<br />
60