24.03.2013 Views

Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...

Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...

Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The thesis considers childbirth risk to have two dimensions. The first<br />

concerns the uncertainty of the process itself as problems could develop at any<br />

time. For example, a woman who did not have any problems at all during the first<br />

stage of labour may suddenly develop postpartum haemorrhage and collapse in<br />

shock during the third stage. It is possible that women who plan a hospital birth<br />

will be concerned about the uncertainty of the process. The other dimension<br />

could be risk due to technology, and modern medicine. For example, a woman<br />

who labours in hospital might be given an epidural for pain relief, which might<br />

then be followed by a caesarean section because she was not able to push when<br />

required to give birth. If the same woman had laboured at home, she may<br />

possibly have avoided the operation. Women who plan to have their children at<br />

home might be more concerned about the iatrogenic risks of the hospital. An<br />

important factor in the differences could be the perception of benefits (Starr<br />

1969). If people perceive the benefits of their decision as great, their tolerance of<br />

risk is higher (Kahneman, Slovic, and Tverslcy 1982). It has been argued that<br />

factors such as personal relationships, control over events, and the importance of<br />

general happiness may also influence how one perceives risk (Crawford 1987).<br />

For example, a woman who desires to have a family experience of childbirth,<br />

where she is also in control, might worry less about the risk of childbirth.<br />

Individual women's childbirth risk perceptions can only be understood in<br />

the light of their social, cultural, and religious norms, as well as their individual<br />

beliefs. Douglas and Wildavsky (1987) argue that there is no single correct<br />

conception of risk, and that there is no way to get everyone else to accept it. They<br />

take the view that people must decide which risks to fear most, which risks are<br />

worthy of attention and concern, which are worth taking, and which can be<br />

ignored. They also point out that the risks that are finally selected for attention<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!