Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ... Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...
HBM emphasises the value placed by an individual on a particular goal and the individual's estimate that the likelihood of a given action will achieve that goal (Becker, Heafner, Kasl et al 1977; Janz and Becker 1984; Kronenfeld and Glik 1991; Maiman and Becker 1974; Rosenstock 1974). The HBM is widely used to explain preventive health behaviour by describing conscious decisions about the cost and benefits of specific actions, and attempts to distinguish factors assumed to influence the adoption of protective action (Janz and Becker 1984; Maiman and Becker 1974). Examples include beliefs and self-protection from REV infection (Abraham, Sheeran, Spears et al 1992), precautionary health behaviour as applied to issues such as polio vaccination, preventive dental care, hypertension-control and medical check-ups (van der Plight 1998). Precautionary behaviour is thought more likely if perceived severity of consequences and vulnerability are high. Kronfeld and Glik (1991) argue that the health belief model contains an explicit conceptualisation of risk beliefs, and that in a narrow perspective belief about susceptibility to a health danger is a risk perception. It has been argued that most studies of HiBM are retrospective rather than prospective (van der Plight 1998), and that in retrospective studies it is often impossible to determine whether beliefs shape behaviour or whether people adapt their beliefs to be consistent with their behaviour (Calnan and Moss 1984). A second theoretical approach incorporated within the precaution adoption process is the theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Ajzen and Fishbein 1980; Fishbein and Ajzen 1975). The TRA is based on an assumption of rationality of choice and systematic use of available information. According to the TRA, a person's intention to perform an act is the immediate determinant of the action. Behavioural intentions are seen as a function of two factors. The first factor is the individual's subjective attitude towards the behaviour, and the second is the social 33
normative factor. The individual's attitude towards the behaviour is a function of the belief that the behaviour will lead to a certain outcome, along with the importance placed upon that outcome by the individual. The social normative factor emphasises the influence of the social environment, and the person's immediate reference group upon behaviour (Kronenfeld and Glik 1991). Risk perception as a construct could be seen as part of the attitudes toward performing a health related behaviour in TRA (Kronenfeld and Glik 1991). Risk perception together with the normative beliefs predicts the intention to behave. The theory of reasoned action approach, therefore, attempts to explain behaviour, unlike the health belief model that contains explicit risk belief components (Kirscht 1989). Social learning theory (SLT), also known as social cognitive theory (Bandura 1977) is the third component in the precaution adoption process. The SLT argues that expectancies and incentives determine behaviour. Three types of expectancies are isolated: those related to environmental cues; those about the consequences of one's own action; and those about one's competence to perform the behaviour needed to influence the outcomes (self-efficacy). Incentives, on the other hand help to regulate behaviour, but only if the consequences are interpreted and understood by the individual. In the health field, social learning theory emphasises the incentives to act in a given situation, and the balance of immediate incentives against the balance of more distant ones (Kirscht 1989). For example, the balance of the immediate gratification of smoking could be balanced against the distant gratification of longer life if one stops smoking. The precaution adoption process (Weinstein 1980; Weinstein 1982; Weinstein 1988) combines the above approaches in an attempt to understand why people adopt or fail to adopt precautions. Weinstein (1980) argues that people demonstrate unrealistic optimism, whereby they believe that negative events are 34
- Page 1 and 2: Women's Decision-Making And Factors
- Page 3 and 4: Figure 1: The paper elimination pro
- Page 5 and 6: Home themes with supporting quotati
- Page 7 and 8: Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 9 and 10: Kingdom is a pluralistic society, w
- Page 11 and 12: hospital delivery following a revie
- Page 13 and 14: The committee issued a press notice
- Page 15 and 16: The recommendations of the report u
- Page 17 and 18: home. They also put forward the fac
- Page 19 and 20: equirements for the maximum lowerin
- Page 21 and 22: Previous committees had made their
- Page 23 and 24: The majority of those interviewed f
- Page 25 and 26: The Expert Maternity Group gathered
- Page 27 and 28: • The woman and, if she wishes, h
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Risk perception Chapter
- Page 31 and 32: From the health practitioner's pers
- Page 33: 1979), is a second approach to unde
- Page 37 and 38: and then choose the place they cons
- Page 39 and 40: example, they worried that the valu
- Page 41 and 42: they can easily imagine or recall a
- Page 43 and 44: are not necessarily chosen because
- Page 45 and 46: make decisions that are not necessa
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: Systematic review of fac
- Page 49 and 50: considered. Primary research design
- Page 51 and 52: If the question of the review is no
- Page 53 and 54: Cochrane Database of Systematic rev
- Page 55 and 56: Table 2: Search terms used Search t
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3: Journals that were hand se
- Page 59 and 60: solely on the basis of the study re
- Page 61 and 62: they were recruited, at what stage
- Page 63 and 64: ,,, ... .g eD .E 0 o 4,7; (.5 g .5
- Page 65 and 66: -o -cs •b a) ..o ,:" .., -0 ti-,
- Page 67 and 68: Quality of studies included in the
- Page 69 and 70: ole to play in their preferences fo
- Page 71 and 72: The next chapter discusses methodol
- Page 73 and 74: observable behaviour are used (Holl
- Page 75 and 76: known? What roles do values play in
- Page 77 and 78: male nursing home is used (Applegat
- Page 79 and 80: The procedure ensures a vigorous se
- Page 81 and 82: investigation have for the particip
- Page 83 and 84: In method triangulation, different
normative factor. The individual's attitude towards the behaviour is a function of<br />
the belief that the behaviour will lead to a certain outcome, along with the<br />
importance placed upon that outcome by the individual. The social normative<br />
factor emphasises the influence of the social environment, and the person's<br />
immediate reference group upon behaviour (Kronenfeld and Glik 1991). Risk<br />
perception as a construct could be seen as part of the attitudes toward performing<br />
a health related behaviour in TRA (Kronenfeld and Glik 1991). Risk perception<br />
together with the normative beliefs predicts the intention to behave. The theory of<br />
reasoned action approach, therefore, attempts to explain behaviour, unlike the<br />
health belief model that contains explicit risk belief components (Kirscht 1989).<br />
Social learning theory (SLT), also known as social cognitive theory<br />
(Bandura 1977) is the third component in the precaution adoption process. The<br />
SLT argues that expectancies and incentives determine behaviour. Three types of<br />
expectancies are isolated: those related to environmental cues; those about the<br />
consequences of one's own action; and those about one's competence to perform<br />
the behaviour needed to influence the outcomes (self-efficacy). Incentives, on the<br />
other hand help to regulate behaviour, but only if the consequences are interpreted<br />
and understood by the individual. In the health field, social learning theory<br />
emphasises the incentives to act in a given situation, and the balance of immediate<br />
incentives against the balance of more distant ones (Kirscht 1989). For example,<br />
the balance of the immediate gratification of smoking could be balanced against<br />
the distant gratification of longer life if one stops smoking.<br />
The precaution adoption process (Weinstein 1980; Weinstein 1982;<br />
Weinstein 1988) combines the above approaches in an attempt to understand why<br />
people adopt or fail to adopt precautions. Weinstein (1980) argues that people<br />
demonstrate unrealistic optimism, whereby they believe that negative events are<br />
34