Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...

Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ... Women's Decision-Making And Factors Affecting Their Choice Of ...

epubs.surrey.ac.uk
from epubs.surrey.ac.uk More from this publisher
24.03.2013 Views

As the women's stories unravelled, some provoked unanticipated feelings from the researcher. Two women particularly described the difficulties, and sometimes cruelty, they experienced at the hands of their carers. The researcher felt much compassion for the women, and sometimes felt a sense of sadness at the hopelessness of some of their situations, and the fact that the researcher could not take active responsibility in helping, except to refer them to appropriate agencies. Although there was a lot of emotion experienced in the course of the interactions with women, it was important to maintain a neutral attitude (Patton 1990). In the study, the researcher empathised with the participants, but did not give any opinions as to how the women's cases should have been handled. The women were just asked about how they felt about the situation and whether they would want to talk to someone about it, in which case the appropriate person was informed, and the woman handed over to them. This section has described the processes used to collect data for the study, the next section will discuss how the data was handled and analysed. The two processes of data collection and analysis in a qualitative study are interactive, which makes it difficult to talk about one without mentioning the other. Data Analysis Methods used to analyse the data are presented, using as much raw data as possible to give the reader an idea of the type of information that was collected, and the procedures used to analyse it. The extensive use of raw data helps to make public the style and process of analysis. Participants' names are replaced by Setswana (researcher's language) names to protect their identity. The present study tried to follow principles of qualitative data analysis, especially the grounded theory approach (Glaser and Strauss 1967). 111

The process of analysis was iterative with data collection. During the interview, the researcher listened, as well as observed, the surroundings and participant's non-verbal cues. In this way, the context in which the research took place and aspects of non-verbal communication could be recorded. Points raised during the interview were clarified at appropriate times, for example, periodically, what the participant said was re-phrased and repeated to her, or she was asked additional questions. This kind of questioning and confirming were geared to understanding the participants, to avoid misinterpreting them in the formal analysis. The following example illustrates questioning to get a meaning of the participant's expression: Nozipho: whetA. I've goiAt up to the hospItcfl, or to the vulotwi,fe with hku partmr, I mean, he has been totaLLu Lonored. It's LLIe,e, u0a 12,VLOW , it olLot talze two you are not hkade to feel..., not specLaL, that's a loft otravikatiz, but uou're LL1R,e a coin.Ver beLt, it's Wu, next, and, I guess uou're -Fvue, Off UDR SO. AKA I tliLmle that because it Ls such a speciAL thi,vtg, it, u out shouts( be made to feeL perhaps A LittLe ',wore uOu }tow, theft wkOlt Uou're acing Ls ctuLte LnoredLbLe avuot nt.ade to feeL that Lt Ls reaLLu. mean? Researcher: When you say you are like a conveyor belt, what does it Noziplio: it Ls n.ore, RVIA. Let's sau for exampLe at the cli,nit„ the run the flu. aid/Liz, uou. Venow, uou have peopLe conti.vto IAA, theu're lit:RA-n.0 theLr Liajecti,ovt anol it is nothi.vtg else to the oroli.voru A IAA, avt.ol uou're havi.vue Dot -person 1,14, after another. tA.0.4., and that's fLne for A flu i.vjecti-oin, but wilco, uou're CiattASILLU 112

The process of analysis was iterative with data collection. During the<br />

interview, the researcher listened, as well as observed, the surroundings and<br />

participant's non-verbal cues. In this way, the context in which the research took<br />

place and aspects of non-verbal communication could be recorded. Points raised<br />

during the interview were clarified at appropriate times, for example, periodically,<br />

what the participant said was re-phrased and repeated to her, or she was asked<br />

additional questions. This kind of questioning and confirming were geared to<br />

understanding the participants, to avoid misinterpreting them in the formal<br />

analysis. The following example illustrates questioning to get a meaning of the<br />

participant's expression:<br />

Nozipho: whetA. I've goiAt up to the hospItcfl, or to the vulotwi,fe with hku<br />

partmr, I mean, he has been totaLLu Lonored. It's LLIe,e, u0a 12,VLOW , it olLot talze<br />

two you are not hkade to feel..., not specLaL, that's a loft otravikatiz, but uou're<br />

LL1R,e a coin.Ver beLt, it's Wu, next, and, I guess uou're -Fvue, <strong>Of</strong>f UDR SO. AKA I<br />

tliLmle that because it Ls such a speciAL thi,vtg, it, u out shouts( be made to feeL<br />

perhaps A LittLe ',wore uOu }tow, theft wkOlt Uou're acing Ls ctuLte LnoredLbLe avuot<br />

nt.ade to feeL that Lt Ls reaLLu.<br />

mean?<br />

Researcher: When you say you are like a conveyor belt, what does it<br />

Noziplio: it Ls n.ore, RVIA. Let's sau for exampLe at the cli,nit„ the run the<br />

flu. aid/Liz, uou. Venow, uou have peopLe conti.vto IAA, theu're lit:RA-n.0 theLr Liajecti,ovt<br />

anol it is nothi.vtg else to the oroli.voru A IAA, avt.ol uou're havi.vue Dot -person 1,14,<br />

after another. tA.0.4., and that's fLne for A flu i.vjecti-oin, but wilco, uou're CiattASILLU<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!