24.03.2013 Views

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the rhetoric associated with wrestling, the gymnasium is said to reproduce<br />

the natural and authentic qualities of village life. Curiously, however, gymnasiums<br />

are the product of a history that is rooted not so much in the<br />

world of peasants as in the palaces of princes and in the urban imagination<br />

of middle-class nationalists.<br />

In the medieval period wrestlers were, in some instances, peasants.<br />

But to the extent they came to embody the identity of a pahalwan they were<br />

wards of the royal state. <strong>The</strong>y were kept in stables by rajas and maharajas<br />

who paid their expenses and built gymnasiums for practice and arenas for<br />

tournament competition. <strong>The</strong>se gymnasiums and arenas were designed to<br />

represent the aesthetics of aristocratic taste, and thus manifest pomp and<br />

pageantry rather than peasant parochialism. Among other things, rose water,<br />

buttermilk, ghee, and in some instances crushed pearls, gold, and silver<br />

were mixed into the earth of the royal pit. Moreover, the ritual features of<br />

the gymnasium as a sacred space were not as significant as its secular configuration<br />

in relation to the authority of the king and the degree of his prestige,<br />

political power, and attendant status in the domain of changing imperial<br />

hierarchies. By most accounts, the place of the gymnasium in the<br />

broader political culture of the princely states took on heightened significance<br />

in the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth centuries when,<br />

as scholars have recently pointed out, the status of rajas and maharajas was<br />

being defined in terms of British imperial authority and the pageantry of<br />

colonial rule.<br />

During this same period of time, gymnasiums were redefined and developed<br />

in the context of various kinds of Indian nationalism. Both militant<br />

Hindu nationalists as well as the more secular nationalists of the Indian<br />

National Congress were concerned with the problem of Indian<br />

masculinity and sought to reform Indian men—in particular middle-class<br />

men, who were regarded as corrupt, weak, and effeminate—by instituting<br />

various forms of physical culture. Thus, after the revolt of 1857, and increasingly<br />

around the turn of the century, wrestling gymnasiums were built<br />

in the newly urbanized areas of north and central India to try to reproduce<br />

the “natural” masculinity of peasants by transplanting the “natural” environment<br />

of rural India into the modern space of rapidly expanding cities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Birla Mill Vyayamshala in the heart of Old Delhi, where, until recently,<br />

Guru Hanuman trained almost all of India’s international freestyle<br />

wrestlers, is the best example of this manufactured tradition of modern Indian<br />

wrestling that is also, significantly, wrestling in India.<br />

Up until his death in 1999, Guru Hanuman epitomized the ideal of an<br />

enlightened master teacher and the role of a master teacher in defining the<br />

structure of training in the gymnasium. A guru, or ustad, is, in essence, a<br />

senior wrestler who imparts to his disciples the knowledge of wrestling. He<br />

Wrestling and Grappling: India 723

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!