24.03.2013 Views

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

though they normally included men from all three of the orders of society<br />

(clerics, lay nobles, and simples), by the end of the twelfth century they<br />

were all dominated by that class of their lay members who were also<br />

knights and who by about 1250 (when knighthood was restricted to men<br />

of knightly or noble birth) were nobles as well. Secular bodies of soldiers<br />

similarly dominated by knights were founded at about the same time as the<br />

earliest religious orders, but seem to have been unknown outside Spain and<br />

northern Italy before about 1325, and flourished primarily between that<br />

date and about 1525.<br />

Although all such bodies are now commonly called “orders,” most<br />

did not use that title, and many were not even bodies corporate. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

the more accurate name is “secular military associations.” Most were effectively<br />

restricted to laymen, and were thus “lay military associations,”<br />

but others included a dependent class of secular priests as well. All such<br />

bodies may also be sorted into nonnoble, seminoble, and strictly noble<br />

types, according to the dominant class of lay members, and each of these<br />

into various subtypes. <strong>The</strong> term order is reserved for certain of the more<br />

elaborate noble subtypes, by which the title was actually used. <strong>The</strong> qualification<br />

“of knighthood” is reserved for the small minority that actually restricted<br />

their principal class of membership to dubbed knights.<br />

Unlike the religious orders on which they were partly modeled, the<br />

secular associations were extremely diverse because they drew upon a variety<br />

of models other than the religious or monastic order of knighthood both<br />

for their forms and attributes and for their goals and activities. <strong>The</strong> most<br />

important of these additional models were the fictional orders or military<br />

brotherhoods of both the Arthurian and (later) the Greek tradition (especially<br />

the companies of the Round Table, the Grail-Keepers, the Frank<br />

Palace, and the Argonauts); the professional guild or confraternity; the military<br />

brotherhood formed to share the prizes and losses of war; the military<br />

and political league established with growing frequency by the princes and<br />

barons of many regions of France, Germany, and Italy to counter political<br />

pressures felt by their members and promote collective advancement; and<br />

finally the bodies of retainers or clients who were increasingly maintained<br />

by kings and princes from the later fourteenth century onward to secure the<br />

loyalty and service of the more prominent members of their own nobility<br />

and of the lesser princes and barons of their region. Most of these emerged<br />

only during the course of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, and therefore<br />

could not have influenced the earliest form of the religious orders.<br />

Any particular association might include the characteristics of two or<br />

more of these six models, but there was actually no single characteristic or<br />

set of characteristics that can be attributed to all of them. Given this diversity,<br />

it is impossible to generalize about the secular associations in any<br />

Orders of Knighthood, Secular 385

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!