24.03.2013 Views

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

302 Koryû Bugei, Japanese<br />

koryû by virtually ending perceptions of practical military value in the arts<br />

of sword, spear, bow, glaive, and grappling. Participation in the classical<br />

bugei flagged rapidly as the new Meiji government closed many urban martial<br />

art academies and encouraged instead the development of a new military<br />

system based on European models. When public and government interest<br />

in traditional martial arts began to revive, from the 1890s onward, it<br />

was directed not to the koryû, but to new, synthesized forms of fencing and<br />

grappling promulgated as means of physical and moral education for the<br />

general public. By the 1930s, the study of these modern cognate arts had<br />

become compulsory in Japanese middle schools, where the emphasis was<br />

on developing aggression, speed, and a self-sacrificing “martial spirit” appropriate<br />

to the imperial armed forces. Consequently, the martial arts became<br />

closely identified with militarism, “feudalism,” and the war effort, resulting,<br />

under the postwar Allied Occupation, in a ban on most forms of<br />

bugei training that lasted until 1952, when the Ministry of Education permitted<br />

the reintroduction of fencing to high schools, provided that it be<br />

taught as physical education and not as a martial art.<br />

A great many koryû died out during the Meiji transformation or the<br />

upheavals of the postwar era. Nevertheless, many survived and several<br />

dozen thrive today. A few are even practiced overseas.<br />

While modern enthusiasts tend to view the koryû as corporate entities<br />

existing across time, this perception is anachronistic. Until the very end of<br />

the medieval period, most ryûha had no institutional structure at all, and<br />

those that did derived it from familial or territorially based relationships<br />

between teachers and students. Medieval bugei masters often traveled<br />

about, instructing students as and where they found them. Some students<br />

followed their teachers from place to place; others trained under them for<br />

short periods while the teacher was in the area. In either case, during this<br />

era a ryûha had little practical existence beyond the man who taught it.<br />

Bugei ryûha can often be clearly identified only in retrospect. Teacherstudent<br />

relationships can be traced backward through time to establish the<br />

continuity of lineages, but few martial art adepts prior to modern times belonged<br />

exclusively to a single lineage, and few had only a single successor.<br />

Unlike many schools of tea ceremony, flower arranging, calligraphy, and<br />

other traditional Japanese arts, in the premodern era most bugei ryûha did<br />

not develop articulated organizational structures whereby senior disciples<br />

were licensed to open branch schools that remained under the authority of<br />

the ryûha headmaster. Instead, martial art teachers tended to practice total<br />

transmission, in which all students certified as having mastered the school’s<br />

arts were given complete possession of them—effectively graduated from<br />

the school with full rights to propagate or modify what they had been<br />

taught as they saw fit. Such students normally left their masters to open

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!