24.03.2013 Views

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

Martial Arts Of The World - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 Knights<br />

crossbow, or harquebus. Thus, the essence of knightly warfare remained<br />

close combat in full armor, either on horse or on foot.<br />

<strong>The</strong> knight also remained until the fifteenth century the most valued<br />

and privileged form of soldier on the field of battle, though much of the<br />

prestige the classic knight enjoyed was derived from the high social status<br />

knights had collectively achieved and the intimate relationship that had<br />

come to exist between the ideology of knighthood and that of nobility. Unlike<br />

the protoknights and their preclassic successors, who were for the most<br />

part men of humble birth and standing, the classic knight was always a nobleman<br />

and usually a territorial lord, and moreover formed part of a nobility<br />

whose greater members, from the emperor down to the most lowly<br />

baron, were invariably admitted to the order of knighthood when they<br />

reached legal adulthood. Furthermore, the ideology of chivalry, or “knightliness”—created<br />

only in the twelfth century—had come to be the dominant<br />

ideology of the nobility as a whole, and its code of conduct was universally<br />

recognized, if not always followed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> history of knighthood (a term reserved for the status of knight,<br />

per se) is the history first of the perfection of its military character to the<br />

level of its classic characteristics, then of its social elevation to the condition<br />

of noble dignity and its simultaneous association with the ideology of<br />

chivalry, and then of the gradual demilitarization of that dignity to the<br />

point where it became purely honorific and served only to convey rank<br />

within the nobility. <strong>The</strong>se periods correspond to quite different stages in the<br />

history of the status, which for clarity must be designated by different<br />

names, and discussed separately as six distinct phases that may be recognized<br />

in the history of the status: (1) protoknighthood (ca. 740–1000/<br />

1100), (2) preclassic knighthood (950/1100–1150/1200), (3) protoclassic<br />

knighthood (1150/1200–1250/1300), (4) high classic knighthood (1250/<br />

1300–1430/50), (5) late classic knighthood, (1430/50–1600/25), and (6)<br />

postclassic knighthood (1600/25–present). Each of these phases may be divided<br />

into two or three subphases, which may be designated earlier or<br />

early, middle, and later or late.<br />

Protoknighthood (ca. 740–ca. 1000/1100)<br />

During the earliest stage in the history of knighthood, the term normally<br />

used to designate these warriors in the sources (still exclusively in Latin)<br />

was caballarius, and the caballarii were still nothing more than elite heavy<br />

cavalrymen, with no distinctive social position or professional code.<br />

Throughout this phase the social condition of the protoknights remained<br />

humble, and the great majority seem to have been free but ignoble and<br />

landless dependents of the noble magnates, maintained in their households<br />

as military servants. Finally, throughout this phase protoknights remained

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!