i Parkia biglobosa - School of Forest Resources & Environmental ...

i Parkia biglobosa - School of Forest Resources & Environmental ... i Parkia biglobosa - School of Forest Resources & Environmental ...

forest.mtu.edu
from forest.mtu.edu More from this publisher
23.03.2013 Views

Resource Management The customary land tenure system is often blamed for the degradation of the land, declining resources, soil infertility and erosion, and deforestation. The attitude of the farmers exploiting resources without taking responsibility for managing those resources harkens back to the essay, ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ (Hardin 1968). Hardin uses the impact of overgrazing as a primary argument in his article. He states that a herdsman concludes that the only sensible course for him is to add another animal to his herd, and then another. The tragedy lies in that each man is locked into a system that compels him to increase his herd without limit – in a world that is limited. This example reflects a simplified explanation of the condition of resource management in Ghana. Water, grazing land, and bush game are shared resources within a community in northern Ghana. These communal resources are shared, only managed and limited when an individual exploits a resource beyond reasonable amounts. For example, a borehole providing water is situated near a group of households. Everyone within the village has access to the water, however, if an individual from a distant household filled several 55 gallon drums with water to use in molding bricks for his house, he would have to pay or his access would be cut off. He has limited rights because this individual did not provide labor to establish or maintain the borehole. The community itself acts to control and manage resources when overexploited by one individual. Ghana’s government has mandated policies to address the management of resources. Government policy recommends families have no more than four children. Fewer children would decelerate population growth and encourage families to provide better care to fewer children. Another government policy bans bush burning. Radio 34

announcements and newspaper articles publicize these policies; however, the government is ineffective in enforcing these policies. Farmers who do follow these policies usually have strong leadership and commitment from the chief and elders in the community who understand the benefits and are effective in promoting these methods. The government has stated these policies but little effort or resources are used to implement and enforce them. Farmers do practice different methods of resource management but economic pressures increasingly force farmers to abandon some of these methods. Farmers historically and traditionally leave economic trees standing in their fields. Despite the long-term benefits, a farmer may chop down the trees to increase his arable land anticipating higher yields, or immediately sell the wood for cash. Farmers can reduce risk and achieve greater productivity and manage limited resources through mixed cropping. Groundnuts fix nitrogen and improve the soil and when planted with millet or maize the crop yields increase. Customary practices such as leaving millet stalks in the field after harvest are now often forsaken. The crop residue when left in the field prevented erosion and returned organic matter to the soil. However, the fields are now often bare because households now collect and use the millet stalks for cooking fuel while selling firewood for cash (Wheat 2000). Increasing competition for resources and decreasing land productivity demands that farmers adopt more sustainable farming practices. The local resources will soon disappear without a collaborative and cooperative management plan developed by local communities and help from government. 35

announcements and newspaper articles publicize these policies; however, the government<br />

is ineffective in enforcing these policies. Farmers who do follow these policies usually<br />

have strong leadership and commitment from the chief and elders in the community who<br />

understand the benefits and are effective in promoting these methods. The government<br />

has stated these policies but little effort or resources are used to implement and enforce<br />

them.<br />

Farmers do practice different methods <strong>of</strong> resource management but economic<br />

pressures increasingly force farmers to abandon some <strong>of</strong> these methods. Farmers<br />

historically and traditionally leave economic trees standing in their fields. Despite the<br />

long-term benefits, a farmer may chop down the trees to increase his arable land<br />

anticipating higher yields, or immediately sell the wood for cash.<br />

Farmers can reduce risk and achieve greater productivity and manage limited<br />

resources through mixed cropping. Groundnuts fix nitrogen and improve the soil and<br />

when planted with millet or maize the crop yields increase. Customary practices such as<br />

leaving millet stalks in the field after harvest are now <strong>of</strong>ten forsaken. The crop residue<br />

when left in the field prevented erosion and returned organic matter to the soil. However,<br />

the fields are now <strong>of</strong>ten bare because households now collect and use the millet stalks for<br />

cooking fuel while selling firewood for cash (Wheat 2000). Increasing competition for<br />

resources and decreasing land productivity demands that farmers adopt more sustainable<br />

farming practices. The local resources will soon disappear without a collaborative and<br />

cooperative management plan developed by local communities and help from<br />

government.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!